research in result

• Privacy Policy

Home » Research Results Section – Writing Guide and Examples

Research Results Section – Writing Guide and Examples

Table of Contents

The results section of a research paper is a crucial part of any academic study. It provides a structured and clear presentation of the findings, enabling readers to understand the outcomes of the research. This section focuses strictly on presenting the data, leaving analysis and interpretation for the discussion section. Writing this section effectively requires precision, clarity, and adherence to the research questions or hypotheses.

Research Results

The results section is where researchers present the findings of their study. It showcases the data collected during the research process, organized systematically for clarity. This section may include both qualitative and quantitative data, often supported by visual aids like tables, charts, and graphs. Importantly, this section avoids subjective interpretations and focuses solely on the objective presentation of data.

Key Characteristics

• Objectivity : Ensures that findings are reported without bias.
• Clarity : Structures information logically to help readers easily comprehend the results.
• Relevance : Includes only data that directly addresses the research questions or hypotheses.
• Conciseness with Detail : Summarizes key findings comprehensively without overloading with excessive information.

Purpose of the Results Section

The results section serves several important functions in a research paper. Its primary goals are to:

• Report the findings of the study systematically and without interpretation.
• Address the research questions or hypotheses explicitly, showing whether they were supported or rejected.
• Provide enough detail for other researchers to replicate the study if needed.
• Lay the groundwork for the discussion section, where implications and significance are explored.

Steps to Write an Effective Results Section

Provide an overview.

Begin with a brief summary of the research goals and the methods used to analyze the data. This introductory context helps readers understand the framework within which the results are presented.

“This section presents the outcomes of the study, which investigated the relationship between physical activity and mental well-being using a quantitative research design.”

Organize Findings Clearly

Organize the results in a logical sequence that aligns with your research questions, hypotheses, or the flow of data collection. Consider structuring the section by:

• Research Question or Hypothesis : Address each systematically.
• Themes or Categories : Group similar findings together, particularly in qualitative studies.
• Chronological Order : Present data as it was collected or analyzed.

Incorporate Visual Aids

Use tables, figures, and graphs to present numerical data, trends, and relationships clearly. Visual aids should complement the text and provide readers with an at-a-glance understanding of complex information.

• Label all visuals appropriately (e.g., “Figure 1: Trends in Weekly Exercise Habits”).
• Include explanatory captions to clarify what each visual represents.
• Reference visuals within the text to ensure readers understand their relevance.

“As shown in Table 2, there was a significant increase in mental well-being scores among participants engaging in daily exercise routines.”

Report Quantitative Findings

For quantitative studies, ensure that numerical data is reported accurately and with appropriate statistical detail. Include:

• Descriptive statistics like means, medians, and standard deviations.
• Inferential statistics, including tests performed (e.g., t-tests, ANOVA) and outcomes (e.g., p-values, effect sizes).

“The analysis revealed that participants who exercised for at least 30 minutes daily reported significantly higher well-being scores (M = 85.3, SD = 7.2) than those who did not (M = 68.4, SD = 8.9), t(78) = 5.67, p < .001.”

Summarize Qualitative Findings

For qualitative data, use themes or categories to organize your results. Include illustrative quotes or excerpts from participants to support your findings. Ensure these excerpts highlight the themes you identified during analysis.

“Participants frequently mentioned the stress-reducing benefits of exercise, with one respondent stating, ‘My morning walk helps me clear my mind and focus better throughout the day.'”

Avoid Interpretation

The results section must present data without any subjective analysis. Interpretation and implications should be saved for the discussion section.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Including too much raw data.

Excessive raw data can overwhelm readers. Instead, present summarized findings, and use appendices for detailed datasets if necessary.

Mixing Results and Discussion

Avoid combining interpretation with results. This can confuse readers and detract from the objective reporting of findings.

Lack of Organization

Disorganized findings can make it challenging for readers to follow your research outcomes. Use headings, subheadings, and logical flow to enhance readability.

Neglecting Negative Results

Report all findings, including those that do not support your hypotheses. Negative or unexpected results are equally important for a comprehensive understanding of your study.

Insufficient Detail

Provide enough context and detail for readers to evaluate your findings. Vague reporting can reduce the credibility of your research.

Examples of Results Section

Quantitative study example.

The survey findings showed that 65% of respondents preferred hybrid work models (n = 520), compared to 20% favoring in-office setups and 15% preferring fully remote work. A chi-square test revealed a significant association between preference and age group, χ²(2, N = 520) = 12.89, p < .001, with younger participants showing the strongest preference for hybrid models.

Qualitative Study Example

The thematic analysis identified three major themes: flexibility, productivity, and work-life balance. Flexibility was the most frequently cited benefit, with one participant noting, “Hybrid work allows me to be productive while still having time for my family.”

Mixed-Methods Study Example

Quantitative data revealed a 25% increase in productivity scores among employees using hybrid models (M = 80.2, SD = 10.5), compared to in-office setups (M = 64.8, SD = 9.3), t(150) = 4.21, p < .001. Qualitative interviews supported these findings, with participants describing hybrid models as “efficient” and “motivating.”

Checklist for the Results Section

• Are all findings relevant to the research questions or hypotheses?
• Is the section logically organized and easy to follow?
• Are visual aids used appropriately to enhance understanding?
• Are statistical details (if applicable) reported accurately and comprehensively?
• Are qualitative findings clearly summarized with evidence?
• Is the distinction between results and discussion maintained?

The results section is a cornerstone of any research paper. By presenting findings clearly and systematically, researchers provide the evidence upon which their conclusions are based. Whether using quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods, a well-written results section ensures the study’s credibility and clarity. Adhering to best practices, avoiding common errors, and employing effective organization will help you craft a results section that is both informative and impactful.

• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches . Sage publications.
• APA (2020). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). American Psychological Association.
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2019). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook . Sage.
• Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). Sage.
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide . Sage.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

APA Table of Contents – Format and Example

Data Collection – Methods Types and Examples

Data Interpretation – Process, Methods and...

Purpose of Research – Objectives and Applications

Critical Analysis – Types, Examples and Writing...

Problem Statement – Writing Guide, Examples and...

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock Locked padlock icon ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

• Publications
• Account settings
• Advanced Search
• Journal List

The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Results

Zahra bahadoran, parvin mirmiran, azita zadeh-vakili, farhad hosseinpanah, asghar ghasemi.

• Author information
• Article notes
• Copyright and License information

Corresponding Author: Endocrine Physiology Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Email: [email protected]

Received 2019 Apr 9; Revised 2019 Apr 15; Accepted 2019 Apr 16; Collection date 2019 Apr.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ ) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

The “results section” of a scientific paper provides the results related to all measurements and outcomes that have been posted earlier in the materials and methods section. This section consists of text, figures, and tables presenting detailed data and facts without interpretation and discussion. Results may be presented in chronological order, general to specific order, most to least important order, or may be organized according to the topic/study groups or experiment/measured parameters. The primary content of this section includes the most relevant results that correspond to the central question stated in the introduction section, whether they support the hypothesis or not. Findings related to secondary outcomes and subgroup analyses may be reported in this section. All results should be presented in a clear, concise, and sensible manner. In this review, we discuss the function, content, and organization of the “results section,” as well as the principles and the most common tips for the writing of this section.

Keywords: Result, Writing Scientific Papers, Medical Scientific Journals

The “results section” is the heart of the paper, around which the other sections are organized ( 1 ). Research is about results and the reader comes to the paper to discover the results ( 2 ). In this section, authors contribute to the development of scientific literature by providing novel, hitherto unknown knowledge ( 3 ). In addition to the results, this section contains data and statistical information for supporting or refuting the hypothesis proposed in the introduction ( 4 ).

“Results section” should provide an objective description of the main findings, clearly and concisely, without interpretation ( 5 , 6 ). The authors need to use an interesting combination of text, tables, and figures to answer the study questions and to tell the story without diversions ( 7 ). The systemic assessment of published articles highlights the fact that the literature frequently suffers from selective reporting of results only for certain assessed outcomes, selective reporting of statistical analyses, and confused, ambiguous, incomplete, or misleading presentation of data ( 8 , 9 ).

In this section of our series on the principles of biomedical scientific writing ( 10 , 11 ), we describe the function, content, and organization of the “results section” in a scientific paper (mostly for hypothesis-testing papers) and provide common recommendations that can help authors to write this section more effectively.

2. The Function of the Results Section

The function of the “results section” is to present the main results of experiments described in the materials and methods section ( 12 , 13 ) and to present the supporting data in the form of text, tables, and figures ( 13 ). This section should answer the basic question: “What did the authors find in research?” By providing the results, authors try to elucidate the research data, making it to the point and meaningful ( 13 ).

3. Content of the Results Section

The “results section” includes both results and data that are presented in text, tables, and figures. Results are presented in the text; data (the most important) are presented in figures and tables, with a limited amount presented in the text ( 13 ). Statistically relevant parameters including sample size, P values, and the type of statistics used are also presented in this section ( 13 ).

3.1. Difference Between Data and Results

Data and results are not the same ( 14 ); providing results but no data vs. data but no results should be avoided ( 14 , 15 ). Results are general statements in the main text that summarize or explain what the data (facts and numbers) show ( 13 , 14 ); in other words, results are text descriptions of what is important about data ( 16 ) and give meaning to the data ( 15 ). When reporting data or results, make sure that they are logical ( 2 ). See Box 1 for more differences between results and data.

Box 1. Difference Between Data and Results ( 13 , 15 ).

a The text presented in square brackets is data and the remainder is a result.

3.2. The Appropriate Format for Presenting Data/Results

Depending on how the data best support the findings of the study, the “results section” is structured as text, tables, and figures ( 12 ) and should consist of a dynamic interplay between text and figures/tables; the most important data are usually presented in both formats ( 17 ). The reader should select the mode of presentation in a way that optimizes comprehension of the data; however, as a general rule, if you want to present three or fewer numbers, you should use a sentence; otherwise, you consider a table or a graph ( 18 ).

Selecting the best format for presenting results/data depends on the level of details (exact values or patterns) to present ( 19 ). Tables are useful to present specific information or exact values ( 19 ), and function as reference tools for readers ( 20 ) whereas figures are useful to show comparisons and patterns ( 19 ), functioning as analytic tools ( 20 ).

Tables are meant to summarize large amounts of data, to organize and display data more clearly than words, to compare groups of data, to simplify found information, and to facilitate calculations ( 19 ). A table typically has three or more interrelated columns and three or more interrelated rows; otherwise, presenting the information in the text may be more appropriate ( 19 ).

The functions of figures include: (1) showing the underlying patterns of data that are not presentable in text or tables, (2) displaying data more clearly than they can be done in text or tables, (3) more summarizing a large amount of data than they can be done in text or tables, and (4) improving the understanding and locating the specific information easily and rapidly ( 21 ).

3.3. Results

The primary content of this section includes the most relevant (but not all) results corresponding to the central question posed in the introduction section, whether they support the hypothesis or not ( 12 , 13 ). The secondary findings, e.g., results related to secondary outcomes and subgroup analyses, may also be reported in this section ( 22 ). Results must be presented for both experimental and control groups ( 13 ). Results of each item mentioned in the materials and methods should be given in the results section ( 12 , 15 ).

The text of the “results section” should state and summarize the main results and explain the data presented within tables and/or figures ( 23 ); reiteration of all numbers presented in tables and figures is not recommended ( 22 ); however, readers must be given the main messages derived from a table or figure without having to interpret the data themselves ( 7 ). It means that if there is a large amount of data in a table or figure, restating a key piece of data in the text is acceptable and helps the reader zero in on important data ( 14 ).

3.3.1. Reporting Negative Findings

Authors are highly recommended excluding irrelevant results but not ignoring valid anomalous results that contradict the research hypothesis or do not support the current scientific literature ( 22 ). The Feynman, says “if you are doing an experiment, you should report everything that you think might make it invalid-not only what you think is right about it” ( 24 ). Although reporting null or negative findings is not as straightforward as positive findings, it may lead to reexamining current scientific thinking, and guide scientists towards unabridged science ( 25 ). Reporting negative findings can also prevent the replication of the study and prevent the waste of time and resources ( 25 ). The ignorance of null or negative findings also leads to an overestimation of an effect size or treatment effect in available data ( 9 ).

3.3.2. Referring to Unpublished Results

Referring to unpublished results is not recommend unless there is a strong argument supporting their inclusion ( 14 ); therefore, authors are advised to avoid using the term “data not shown” ( 4 ).

3.3.3. Methods or Interpretation in the Results Section

Generally, the “results section” is not the place for presenting methods and experimental details or interpreting data ( 14 ). When experiments are described in this section, if a result leads to additional experiments, it is better to report the new experimental details in the “results section” ( 14 ). Sometimes authors want to refer to a specific experiment or method in results; in these cases, they should not repeat experimental details, but preferably use a transition phrase to link methods with results ( 14 ). To justify the rationale behind the experiment, using topic sentences/phrases (e.g. in order to determine whether…) provides an overview before giving details ( 12 ); however, in this case, the method statement should not be used as a topic sentence and the main verbs should describe results, not methods (e.g., “ when propranolol was administered during normal ventilation, phospholipids decreased ”; here “ method ” is subordinated in a transition clause and result is the main clause) ( 13 ). Two patterns of sentence structure are recommended for including methods in a result statement: making the method the subject of the sentence or stating the method using a transition phrase or clause and the result in the main clause ( 13 ).

The traditional view of writing the “results section” is just to report data and results without any interpretation; accordingly, the result is not expected to contain statements that need to be referenced (comparisons of findings) ( 13 , 26 ). In another view, some interpretation or brief comparisons that do not fit into the discussion may be included ( 13 , 27 ).

Data are facts and numbers, mostly presented as non-textual elements (usually in tables and figures) where they are easy to read ( 13 , 14 , 28 ). A limited amount of data may also be presented in the text, following a result statement ( 13 ) although too much data in the text make it too long ( Box 1 ) ( 28 ). Data may be in the form of raw data, summarized data, or transformed data ( 13 ); however, it is suggested that raw data (i.e. patients’ records, individual observations) not be presented in results ( 12 ). Note that numerical data are absolute while some data, e.g. microscopic data, are subjective ( 2 ).

3.4.1. Non-Textual Elements

Providing study findings visually, rather than entire textualizing, enables authors to summarize a great deal of data compactly within the text with an appropriate reference; some images convey more than words ( 29 ). The primary purpose of non-textual elements, i.e. tables, graphs, figures, and maps, is to present data such that they can be easily and quickly grasped ( 23 ) while being more informative than when appearing in the text ( 6 ). Tables and figures should be complete/comprehensible, being able to stand alone without the text ( 5 , 12 ).

Non-textual elements should be referred to in the text at the appropriate point ( 5 , 6 , 12 ). Location statements, i.e. statements referring to non-textual elements, may be presented in different patterns (e.g., A. X is shown in table/figure; B. table/figure shows; C. see table/figure; D. as shown in table/figure); pattern B is more and pattern C is less common ( 27 ).

Figure 1. Components of a table in a scientific paper; because of spanner heading, the table has column subheading instead of the column heading. Note that there is no vertical line and limited horizontal lines.

Some general tips about using non-textual elements in the “results section” are reviewed in Box 2 . The most common rules in organizing tables and figures are given in the following. For more information about designing different types of tables/figures/graphs, please refer to additional references ( 7 , 19 , 20 , 30 , 31 ).

Box 2. General Tips for Presenting Data in Tables and Figures.

3.4.1.1. tables.

The use of tables is an effective way to summarize demographic information and descriptive statistics ( 23 ). Note that tables must have a purpose and be integrated into the text ( 21 ). Tables are most useful to present counts, proportions, and percentages ( 8 ), and are appropriate also for presenting details especially when exact values matter ( 32 ), being are more informative than graphs ( 29 ). However, limited information should be presented in tables; otherwise, most readers find them difficult to read and thus, may ignore them ( 5 , 23 ). Data in tables can be arranged horizontally or vertically; whenever possible, primary comparisons are preferably presented horizontally from left to right ( 19 ).

3.4.1.1.1. Basic Elements of Tables

Tables usually have at least six elements: (1) table number, (2) table title, (3) row headings (stubs), and (4) column headings (boxes), identifying information in rows and columns, (5) data in data field, and (6) horizontal lines (rules). Most also have footnotes, row subheadings, spanner headings (identifying subgroups in column headings), and expanded forms of abbreviations in the table ( 19 , 21 , 31 , 33 ).

The table title should clearly state what appears in it and provide sufficient information on the study, i.e. provide a context helping readers interpret the table information ( 19 ). Some specific details may also be provided including the type and number of subjects or the period of study ( 30 ). For developing the title of a table, one can describe the main cell entries, followed by qualification or more description ( 32 ). The table’s title is presented as a phrase not a full sentence ( 19 ). Authors need to refer to the journal’s style for rules on which words in titles are capitalized.

As a rule, comparing two (or even three) numbers should be side-by-side rather than above and below ( 30 ). Column and row headings help readers find information and they should be included group sizes and measurement units ( 19 ). Tables should be in borderless grids of rows and columns ( 5 , 32 ) with no vertical rule and limited horizontal rules ( 32 ). The first column of a table includes usually a list of variables that are presented in the table; although the first column usually does not need a header, sometimes a simple description of what appears in each row may be provided as the heading of the first column. Units for variables may be placed in parentheses immediately below the row descriptions ( 30 ).

Headings for other columns should also be informative without vague labels, e.g. group A, group B, group C, etc.; instead, a brief description summarizing group characteristics is used ( 30 ). The last column may show P values for comparison between study groups ( 34 ), except for randomized clinical trials, where P values are not needed to compare baseline characteristics of participants ( 7 ). The first letters of lines and column headings in tables should be capitalized.

The fields of tables are points at which columns and rows intersect ( 19 ). Cells of a table are the data field of the table, other than those containing row and column headings ( 21 ). Cells contain information as numerals, text, or symbols ( 19 ). Every cell must contain information; if no information is available, one can use NA in the cell and define it in the footnote as not available or not applicable; alternatively, a dash mark may be inserted ( 19 ). The content of columns need to be aligned ( 19 ); words are usually left aligned, numerals are aligned at decimals, parenthesis, and factors of 10 ( 19 , 21 ).

Table footnotes should be brief, and define abbreviations, provide statistical results, and explain discrepancies in data, e.g., “percentages do not total 100 because of rounding” ( 19 , 30 ). In addition to asterisks usually used to show statistical significance ( 33 ), the following symbols are used, in sequence, for further notes: †, ‡, §, ¶, #, ††, ‡‡ ( 30 ).

3.4.1.1.2. Different Types of Tables

Table of lists, table of baseline or clinical characteristics of subjects, table of comparisons, and table of multivariable results are various types of tables that may be used ( 30 ). The table’s format should be selected according to the purpose of the table ( 30 ). A table of lists just presents a list of items including diagnostic criteria or causes of a disease; it is critical to arrange such tables based on their contents by order (e.g., alphabetical order) or their importance (most to least) ( 30 ). Tables of study participants’ characteristics usually provide a general overview of the essential characteristics of subjects, such as age, sex, race, disease stage, and selected risk factors ( 30 ). The table of comparisons (≥ two groups) provides details for each group and differences between the groups. Tables of multivariable results elaborate results of statistical analyses assessing relationships between predictor (independent) and outcome (dependent) variables, and usually include regression coefficients, standard errors, slopes, partial correlation coefficients, and P values or odds ratio, hazard ratios, and 95% confidence intervals for regression models ( 30 ).

3.4.1.2. Figures

Graphical elements convey the important messages of research ( 20 ). A figure is “any graphical display to present information or data” ( 20 ), and it effectively presents complicated patterns ( 32 ), best used for presenting an important point at a glance or indicating trends or relationships ( 20 ). Like tables, figures should have a purpose and be integrated with the rest of the text ( 21 ).

3.4.1.2.1. Basic Elements of Figures

Most figures that present quantitative information (charts and graphs) have at least seven elements, including figure number, figure caption/legend, data field, vertical scale, horizontal scale, labels, and data (plotting symbols, lines, and so on) ( 21 ). Some figures also have reference lines in the data field to help orient readers and keys that identify data ( 21 ).

Figure caption/legend, usually given below the figure, describes the figure and must reflect the figure entirely, independent of the main text ( 21 , 31 ). For the figure to stand alone, a figure legend needs to be included four parts (a brief title, experimental or statistical information/details, definitions of symbols, line, or bar patterns, and abbreviations) ( 31 ).

Data field is a space in the figure in which data are presented; it is usually bordered on the left by the X-axis (abscissa) and on the bottom by the Y-axis (ordinate) ( 20 , 21 ). Labels identify the variables graphed and the units of measurement ( 21 ). Figure lines should be broad and the labeling text should be large enough to be legible after reduction to a single- or two-column size ( 32 ). Appropriate font size should be used to maintain legibility after fitting figures to publication size ( 31 ).

Scales on each axis should match the data range and be slightly above the highest value ( 20 ). Symbols should be uniform across the figures ( 20 ). The data point symbols should be easily distinguishable; using black and white circles (● - ∘) is the easiest way when two are needed ( 31 ); if more are needed, using up-pointing triangles (▲ - Δ) and squares (■ - □) is suggested ( 31 ). Using symbols, line types, and colors is also effective in differentiating important strata in figures ( 8 ).

3.4.1.2.2. Emphasizing Important Data on Figures

To make figures visually efficient, the subordination of all non-data elements vs. data elements is advised (gridlines should be used as thin as possible and very faint). Directly labeling objects, instead of legends, may keep readers’ attention on the most important parts of the figure ( 8 ). Using different line weights may also be helpful to emphasize the important information/data in figures ( 31 ). The use of color, shading, or 3D perspectives is not suggested unless they serve a specific explanatory function in figure ( 8 ).

3.4.1.2.3. Different Types of Figures

Two major categories of figures are statistical figures (graphs) and non-statistical figures (clinical images, photographs, diagrams, illustrations, and textual figures) ( 20 ). Graphs are suitable for presenting relationships whereas non-statistical figures are used to confirm findings or provide explanatory information ( 20 ).

In statistical figures, selecting a graphical format (bar graph, line graph, dot plot, and scatterplot) is done according to the type of relationship that authors wish to communicate ( 20 ); for example, line graphs are appropriate for showing trends and bar graphs for magnitudes ( 20 ). Using a graphing format that is easy to interpret is preferred ( 20 ); pie graphs are sparingly used because comparing different angles is complicated with them ( 20 ). Graphs should accurately represent findings; when possible, scales should start at zero, and figure axes should not be altered in order to make data more meaningful ( 20 ).

Non-statistical figures are those that visually present information that does not contain data ( 20 ). Clinical images and photographs [ultrasonograms, computed tomographic scans (CT scans), magnetic resonance images (MRI), images of patients, tissue samples, microscopic findings, and so on] provide absolute proof of findings ( 20 ). Illustrations are used for explaining structures (parts of a cell), mechanisms, and relationships ( 20 ). Diagrams (flowcharts, algorithms, pedigrees, and maps) are useful for displaying complex relations ( 20 ). Textual figures, containing only text, are mostly used for describing steps of a procedure or summarizing guidelines ( 20 ). For photographs, patient information or identifiers should be removed ( 20 ).

3.5. Statistics in the Results Section

Statistics in the “results section” must report data in a way that enables readers to assess the degree of experimental variation and to estimate the variability or precision of the findings ( 22 ). For more details, one can see SAMPL (Statistical Analysis and methods in the Published Literature) guidelines ( 35 ). To report normally distributed data, the mean and estimated variation from mean should be stated ( 13 ). Variability should be reported using standard deviation (SD), which is a descriptive statistic ( 36 ) and reflects the dispersion of individual sample observation of the sample mean ( 37 ). The standard error (SE), an inferential statistic ( 36 ) reflecting the theoretical dispersion of sample means about some population means, characterizes uncertainty about true values of population means ( 37 ). It is useful for assessing the precision of an estimator ( 36 ) and is not an appropriate estimate of the variability in observations ( 37 ). Using “mean (SD or SE)” is preferred to “mean ± SD or SE” because the “±” sign can cause confusion ( 22 ). Increasing sample size decreases SE but not SD ( 36 ). To report data with a skewed distribution, the median and the interquartile range (between 25th and 75th percentiles) should be provided ( 22 ).

To report risk, rates, and ratios, one should use a type of rate (incidence rate, survival rate), ratio (odds ratio, hazards ratio), or risk (absolute risk, relative risk, relative risk reduction) ( 35 ). The measure of precision (95% CI) for estimated risks, rates, and ratios should also be provided ( 35 ). For correlation analysis, the exact values of the correlation coefficient and 95% CI should be reported. Describing correlation using qualitative words (low, moderate, high) without providing a clear definition is not acceptable ( 35 ). Results of regression analysis should include regression coefficients (β) of each explanatory variable, corresponding 95% CI and/or P value and a measure of the “goodness-of-fit” of the model ( 35 ).

3.5.1. Significance Levels

A P value is the probability of consistency between data and the hypothesis being tested ( 38 ). Reporting the exact P values ( P = 0.34 or P = 0.02) rather than the conventional P ( P < 0.05) is recommended for all primary analyses ( 12 , 37 ) as it conveys more information ( 37 ). The use of the term “partially significant” or “marginally significant”, where the P value is almost significant (e.g. P = 0.057) is not acceptable if the significance level is defined as P = 0.05 ( 39 ). Some, however, argue that it is not always necessary to stick to P = 0.05 for the interpretation of results and it is better to report the exact P value and confidence interval for the estimator ( 40 ).

The use of the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) can provide further information compared to P values per se, and prefigures the direction of the effect size (negative or positive), its magnitude, and the degree of precision ( 17 ). A confidence interval characterizes uncertainty about the true value of population parameters ( 37 ). It is essential to provide the sample size (n) and probability values for tests of statistical significance ( 13 ).

Statements about significance must be qualified numerically ( 41 ). In the text, it is suggested that P values be reported as equalities rather than as inequalities in relation to the alpha criterion ( 41 ). In tables and figures, inequalities may be useful for groups of data ( 41 ) where asterisks *, **, and *** are usually used to show statistical significance at 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 probability levels, respectively ( 33 ).

Although not consistent, P values < 0.001 are reported as P < 0.001; for 0.001 ≤ P values < 0.01, a three-significant digit is recommended, e.g. P = 0.003; for 0.01 ≤ P values < 0.1, a two-significant digit is sufficient (e.g. P = 0.05); for 0.1 ≤ P values ≤ 0.9, a one-significant digit is sufficient (e.g. P = 0.4); and P values > 0.9 are reported as P > 0.9 ( 42 ). For genome-wide association studies, the power of 10 is used for reporting P values, e.g. 6 × 10 -9 ( 42 ). It is generally suggested that zero be used before a decimal point when the value is below one, e.g. 0.37 ( 43 ). According to the American Psychological Association, zero before a decimal point is used for numbers that are below one, but it can also be used for values that may exceed one (e.g. 0.23 cm). Therefore, when statistics cannot be greater than one (e.g. correlations, proportions, and P values), do not use a zero before decimal fraction, e.g. P = .028 not P = 0.028 ( 18 ); this recommendation, however, is not always adopted by everyone. The international standard is P (large italic) although both ‘p’ and ‘P’ are allowed ( 40 ).

4. Organization of the Results Section

There are different ways for organizing the “results section” including ( 1 , 12 , 14 , 22 , 44 ): (1) chronological order, (2) general to specific, (3) most to least important, and (4) grouping results by topic/study groups or experiment/measured parameters. Authors decide which format is more appropriate for the presentation of their data ( 12 ); anyway, results should be presented in a logical manner ( 4 ).

4.1. Different Ways of Organizing the Results Section

4.1.1. chronological order.

The best order for organizing “results section” may be the chronological order ( 22 ). It is considered as the most straightforward approach using subheadings that parallel methods ( 14 ). This order facilitates referring to a method associated with a given result ( 14 ) such that results are presented in the same order as methods ( 15 ).

4.1.2. General to Specific

This format is mostly used in clinical studies involving multiple groups of individuals receiving different treatments ( 14 ). The “results section” usually proceeds from general to more specific findings ( 1 ). Characteristics of the overall study population (sex and age distribution and dropouts) are first given ( 14 ), followed by data and results for each group starting with the control group or the group receiving the standard treatment ( 14 ); finally, the disease group or group receiving the experimental treatment are addressed ( 14 ). As a general rule, secondary results should be given after presenting more important (primary) results, followed by any supporting information ( 22 ). A common order is stating recruitment/response, characteristics of the sample/study participants, findings from the primary analyses, findings from secondary analyses, and any additional or unexpected findings ( 17 ). In other words, the “results section” should be initiated by univariate statistics, followed by bivariate analyses to describe associations between explanatory and outcome variables; finally, it gets through by any multivariate analyses ( 7 ).

4.1.3. Most to Least Important

This format is used in case that the order of presenting results is not critical to their being comprehendible and allows the author to immediately highlight important findings ( 14 ). Results that answer the main question are presented at the beginning of the “results section,” followed by other results in next paragraphs ( 13 ).

4.1.4. Grouping by Topic or Experiment

Comparison of the diagnostic and analytical performance of a number of assays for analytes is an example of using this format ( 14 ).

4.2. Paragraphing of the Results Section

The “results section” may be initiated by two approaches: (1) by giving a general (not detailed) overview of the experiment and (2) by going directly to the results by referring to tables or figures ( 44 ). The first paragraph of this section, along with table 1, describes the characteristics of the study population (number, sex, age, and symptoms) ( 23 ). These data show the comparability of the study groups at baseline and the distribution of potential confounders between groups, as a source of bias that can affect the study findings ( 7 ). It allows the reader to decide whether or not the case and control groups are similar and represent the patient population in their private practice ( 23 ).

For clinical trials, the number of patients completing the protocol in each treatment/study group, the number of patients lost to follow-up, and the number and reasons for excluded/withdrawn subjects should be given. Commenting on whether baseline characteristics of study groups are statistically similar or different is also important ( 1 ). For further information, authors can consult reporting guidelines for the main study types available at http://www.equator-network.org.

The number of the middle paragraphs depends on the number of research questions/hypotheses and the types of statistical analyses; each hypothesis or specific analysis typically devotes at least a paragraph to itself ( 1 ). Figure legends, description of the methods and results for control groups should not be given at the beginning of paragraphs, as they do not narrate the story ( 28 ). However, sometimes, it is needed that results of the control group are presented first (e.g. for establishing the stability of baseline) ( 13 ).

5. Emphasizing Important Results

Since not all results are equally important, the reader must be able to distinguish important results and authors have to emphasize important information and de-emphasize less important information ( 13 ). There are various techniques for emphasizing important information, including condensing or omitting less important information, subordinating less important information, placing important results at the power position, and labeling, stating, and repeating important information ( 13 ).

For condensing or omitting less important information, you should be careful not to duplicate/repeat data in tables and figures or repeat them in the text ( 4 , 6 , 12 ); one or two values from tables/figures can be repeated in the text for emphasis ( 13 ).

For subordinating less important information, one should not use table titles, figure legends or methods statement as a topic sentence in the text ( 13 , 22 ). Instead, after stating the first result relevant to the table/figure, you can cite it in parenthesis ( 13 ). Since a result states a message and creates an expectation, it is a more powerful topic sentence than a figure legend or table title ( 13 ). Sometimes, control results can be subordinated by incorporating them into experimental results ( 13 ).

To highlight more important results (those that help answer questions), authors can put these results at the beginning of paragraphs, the strongest power position ( 12 , 22 , 28 ), followed by supporting details and control results ( 28 ).

Moreover, key findings may receive more attention by using a signal (e.g. we found or we observed) at the beginning of the sentence ( 13 ).

6. Other Considerations

6.1. length and paragraphing.

To see the forest for the tree, the “results section” should be as brief and uncluttered as possible ( 13 ), which can be accomplished by having a well-organized “materials and methods” section ( 3 ) and avoiding unnecessary repetition ( 13 ); for example, similar results for several variables can be reported together. The “results section” of an original manuscript usually includes 2 - 3 pages (~1000 words) with a 1.5 line spacing, font size 11 (including tables and figures) ( 45 ), and 4 - 9 paragraphs (each 130 words) on average ( 45 ); a paragraph should be devoted to one or more closely related figures ( 4 ).

Presenting additional results/data as supplementary materials is a suggestion for keeping the “results section” brief ( 17 ). In addition to save the text space, supplementary materials improve the presentation and facilitate communications among scientists ( 46 , 47 ). According to Springer, supplementary materials can be used for presenting data that are not needed to support the major conclusions but are still interesting. However, keep in mind that the unregulated use of supplementary materials is harmful to science ( 47 ). Supplementary materials should be referred to at the appropriate points in the main text.

For referring to results obtained in hypothesis testing studies, using past tenses is recommended ( 4 , 12 - 14 ); non-textual elements should be referred using present tenses, e.g. “as seen in table 1 …” or “table 1 shows …” in descriptive studies, results are reported in the present tense ( 13 ).

6.3. Word Choice

Although adverbs/adjectives are commonly used to highlight the importance of results, it is recommended altogether avoiding the use of such qualitative/emotive words in the “results section” ( 7 , 13 ). Some believe that qualitative words should not be used because they may imply an interpretation of findings ( 17 ). In biomedical publications, the terms ‘significant, significance, and significantly’ (followed by P values) are used to show statistical relationships and should not be used for other purposes for which, other terms such as substantial, considerable, or noteworthy can be used ( 14 ). See Box 3 for appropriate word choice for the “results section.”

Box 3. Some Do's and Don’ts for Word Choice in a “Results Section” ( 7 , 13 ).

In the “results section,” to make a comparison between the results, i.e. stating the similarity/equivalence or difference/non-equivalence, using appropriate signals is recommended ( 27 ). To show a similarity, a signal to the reader may be used such as “like”, “alike”, “similar to”, and “the same as”; to show differences, the following signals can be used: “but”, “while”, “however”, “in contrast”, “more likely than”, and “less likely than” ( 27 ).

6.4. Reporting Numbers

Numbers play an important role in scientific communication and there are some golden rules for reporting numbers in a scientific paper ( 43 , 48 ). Significant figures (significant digits) should reflect the degree of precision of the original measurement ( 12 ). The number of digits reported for a quantity should be consistent with scientific relevance ( 37 ); for example, a resolution to 0.001 units is necessary for pH but a resolution of < 1 mm Hg is unimportant for blood pressure ( 37 ). Avoid using “about” or “approximately” to qualify a measurement or calculation ( 12 ). The use of percentage for sample sizes of < 20 and decimal for sample sizes of < 100 is not recommended ( 43 ).

The numbers should be spelled out at the beginning of a sentence or when they are less than 10, e.g., twelve students improved… ( 43 ). In a sentence, the authors should be consistent where they use numbers as numerals or spelled-out ( 43 ). Before a unit of a measure, time, dates, and points, numbers should be used as numerals, e.g. 12 cm; 1 h 34 min; at 12:30 A.M., and on a 7-point scale ( 18 ).

A space between the numeral and the unit should be considered, except in the case of %. Because the terms “billion,” “trillion,” and “quadrillion” imply different numbers in Europe and the USA, they should not be used ( 48 ). To express ranges in text, the terms “to” or “through” are preferred to dashes; in tables, the use of dashes or hyphens is recommended ( 48 ).

7. Conclusions

The “results section” of a biomedical manuscript should clearly present findings of the study using an effective combination of results and data. Some dos and don’ts of writing the “results section” are provided in Box 4 . Authors should try to find the best format using a dynamic interplay between text and figures/tables. Results can be organized in different ways including chronological order or most to least important; however, results should be presented in a manner that makes sense.

Box 4. Do's and Don’ts of Writing a “Results Section“.

Acknowledgments.

The authors wish to acknowledge Ms. Niloofar Shiva for critical editing of English grammar and syntax of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interests: It is not declared by the authors.

Funding/Support: Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences supported the study.

Contributor Information

Zahra Bahadoran, Email: [email protected].

Parvin Mirmiran, Email: [email protected].

Azita Zadeh-Vakili, Email: [email protected].

Farhad Hosseinpanah, Email: [email protected].

Asghar Ghasemi, Email: [email protected].

• 1. Ohwovoriole AE. Writing biomedical manuscripts part II: Standard elements and common errors. West Afr J Med. 2011;30(6):389–99. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 2. Thrower PA. Writing a scientific paper: IV. Results and discussion. Carbon. 2010;48(10):2675–6. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.04.041. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 3. Gastel B, Day RA. How to write and publish a scientific paper. ABC-CLIO; 2016. [ Google Scholar ]
• 4. Cetin S, Hackam DJ. An approach to the writing of a scientific manuscript. J Surg Res. 2005;128(2):165–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2005.07.002. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 5. Cunningham SJ. How to...write a paper. J Orthod. 2004;31(1):47–51. doi: 10.1179/146531204225011328. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 6. Dogra S. Why your manuscript was rejected and how to prevent it. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2011;77(2):123–7. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.77449. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 7. Peat J, Elliott E, Baur L, Keena V. Results. In: Peat J, editor. Scientific writing: Easy when you know how. John Wiley & Sons; 2013. pp. 63–85. [ Google Scholar ]
• 8. Moher D, Altman D, Schulz K, Simera I, Wager E. Guidelines for reporting health research: A user's manual. John Wiley & Sons; 2014. [ Google Scholar ]
• 9. Dwan K, Altman DG, Arnaiz JA, Bloom J, Chan AW, Cronin E, et al. Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias. PLoS One. 2008;3(8):e3081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003081. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 10. Bahadoran Z, Jeddi S, Mirmiran P, Ghasemi A. The principles of biomedical scientific writing: Introduction. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2018;16(4):e84795. doi: 10.5812/ijem.84795. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 11. Ghasemi A, Bahadoran Z, Zadeh-Vakili A, Montazeri SA, Hosseinpanah F. The principles of biomedical scientific writing: Materials and methods. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2019;17(1):e88155. doi: 10.5812/ijem.88155. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 12. Ng KH, Peh WC. Writing the results. Singapore Med J. 2008;49(12):967–8. quiz 969. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 13. Zeiger M. Results. In: Zeiger M, editor. Essentials of writing biomedical research papers. McGraw-Hill; 2000. pp. 154–75. [ Google Scholar ]
• 14. Annesley TM. Show your cards: The results section and the poker game. Clin Chem. 2010;56(7):1066–70. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.148148. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 15. Foote M. The proof of the pudding: How to report results and write a good discussion. Chest. 2009;135(3):866–8. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-2613. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 16. Tips to improve your research paper: The results section. 2013 Available at: https://www.bestcustomwriting.com/blog/tips-to-improve-your-research-paper-the-results-section.
• 17. Kotz D, Cals JW. Effective writing and publishing scientific papers, part V: Results. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(9):945. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.04.003. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 18. American Psychological Association . Publication manual of the American psychological association. 6th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2013. [ Google Scholar ]
• 19. Riordan L. Enhancing your manuscript with graphic elements, part 1: Tables. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2013;113(1):54–7. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 20. Riordan L. Enhancing your manuscript with graphic elements, part 2: Figures. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2013;113(5):424–31. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 21. Lang TA, Secic M, Lang T. How to report statistics in medicine: Annotated guidelines for authors, editors, and reviewers. ACP Press; 2006. [ Google Scholar ]
• 22. O'Connor M. Writing successfully in science. London: Chapman & Hall; 1991. [ Google Scholar ]
• 23. Kliewer MA. Writing it up: A step-by-step guide to publication for beginning investigators. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185(3):591–6. doi: 10.2214/ajr.185.3.01850591. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 24. Feynman RP. Cargo cult science. Engin Sci. 1974;37(7):10–3. [ Google Scholar ]
• 25. Matosin N, Frank E, Engel M, Lum JS, Newell KA. Negativity towards negative results: A discussion of the disconnect between scientific worth and scientific culture. Dis Model Mech. 2014;7(2):171–3. doi: 10.1242/dmm.015123. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 26. Swales JM, Feak CB. Constructing a research paper II. In: Swales JM, Feak CB, editors. Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press; 2004. pp. 327–78. [ Google Scholar ]
• 27. Swales JM, Feak CB. Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. Vol. 1. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press; 2004. [ Google Scholar ]
• 28. Zeiger M. Towards clearer writing. Eur Respir J. 1993;6(4):457–60. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 29. Faber J. Writing scientific manuscripts: Most common mistakes. Dental Press J Orthod. 2017;22(5):113–7. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.22.5.113-117.sar. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 30. Browner WS. Publishing and presenting clinical research. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012. [ Google Scholar ]
• 31. Zeiger M. Tables and figures. In: Zeiger M, editor. Essentials of writing biomedical research papers. McGraw-Hill; 2000. pp. 223–60. [ Google Scholar ]
• 32. Rothman KJ. Writing for epidemiology. Epidemiology. 1998;9(3):333–7. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199805000-00019. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 33. Kotz D, Cals JW. Effective writing and publishing scientific papers, part VII: Tables and figures. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(11):1197. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.04.016. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 34. Zhang Z, Gayle AA, Wang J, Zhang H, Cardinal-Fernandez P. Comparing baseline characteristics between groups: An introduction to the CBCgrps package. Ann Transl Med. 2017;5(24):484. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.09.39. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 35. Lang TA, Altman DG. Basic statistical reporting for articles published in biomedical journals: The "statistical analyses and methods in the published literature" or the SAMPL guidelines. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(1):5–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.09.006. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 36. Anderson DR, Link WA, Johnson DH, Burnham KP. Suggestions for presenting the results of data analyses. J Wildlife Manag. 2001;65(3):373. doi: 10.2307/3803088. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 37. Curran-Everett D, Benos DJ, American Physiological S. Guidelines for reporting statistics in journals published by the American Physiological Society. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2004;287(2):E189–91. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00213.2004. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 38. Tanha K, Mohammadi N, Janani L. P-value: What is and what is not. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017;31:65. doi: 10.14196/mjiri.31.65. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 39. Habibzadeh F. Common statistical mistakes in manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. J Eur Sci Edit. 2013;39:92–4. [ Google Scholar ]
• 40. Fukuda H, Ohashi Y. A guideline for reporting results of statistical analysis in Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1997;27(3):121–7. doi: 10.1093/jjco/27.3.121. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 41. Sarter M, Fritschy JM. Reporting statistical methods and statistical results in EJN. Eur J Neurosci. 2008;28(12):2363–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06581.x. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 42. Cole TJ. Too many digits: The presentation of numerical data. Arch Dis Child. 2015;100(7):608–9. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307149. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 43. Peat J, Elliott E, Baur L, Keena V. Scientific writing: Easy when you know how. John Wiley & Sons; 2013. [ Google Scholar ]
• 44. Wallwork A. Results. In: Wallwork A, editor. English for writing research papers. Springer; 2016. pp. 295–307. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 45. Araujo CG. Detailing the writing of scientific manuscripts: 25-30 paragraphs. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014;102(2):e21–3. doi: 10.5935/abc.20140019. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 46. Drotar D. Editorial: How to write an effective results and discussion for the journal of pediatric psychology. J Pediatr Psychol. 2009;34(4):339–43. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp014. [ DOI ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 47. Pop M, Salzberg SL. Use and mis-use of supplementary material in science publications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2015;16:237. doi: 10.1186/s12859-015-0668-z. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 48. Rogers SM. Mastering scientific and medical writing. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2007. [ Google Scholar ]
• View on publisher site
• PDF (448.3 KB)
• Collections

Similar articles

Cited by other articles, links to ncbi databases.

• Download .nbib .nbib
• Format: AMA APA MLA NLM

Add to Collections

• Research Process
• Manuscript Preparation
• Manuscript Review
• Publication Process
• Publication Recognition
• Language Editing Services
• Translation Services

How to Write the Results Section: Guide to Structure and Key Points

• 4 minute read
• 91.6K views

Table of Contents

The ‘ Results’ section of a research paper, like the ‘Introduction’ and other key parts, attracts significant attention from editors, reviewers, and readers. The reason lies in its critical role — that of revealing the key findings of a study and demonstrating how your research fills a knowledge gap in your field of study. Given its importance, crafting a clear and logically structured results section is essential.   

In this article, we will discuss the key elements of an effective results section and share strategies for making it concise and engaging. We hope this guide will help you quickly grasp ways of writing the results section, avoid common pitfalls, and make your writing process more efficient and effective.  

Structure of the results section  

Briefly restate the research topic in the introduction : Although the main purpose of the  results section  in a research paper is to list the notable findings of a study, it is customary to start with a brief repetition of the research question. This helps refocus the reader, allowing them to better appreciate the relevance of the findings. Additionally, restating the research question establishes a connection to the previous section of the paper, creating a smoother flow of information.  

Systematically present your research findings : Address the primary research question first, followed by the secondary research questions. If your research addresses multiple questions, mention the findings related to each one individually to ensure clarity and coherence.  

Represent your results visually: Graphs, tables, and other figures can help illustrate the findings of your paper, especially if there is a large amount of data in the results. As a rule of thumb, use a visual medium like a graph or a table if you wish to present three or more statistical values simultaneously.  

Graphical or tabular representations of data can also make your results section more visually appealing. Remember, an appealing and well-organized results section can help peer reviewers better understand the merits of your research, thereby increasing your chances of publication.  

Practical guidance for writing an effective ‘Results’ section   

• Always use simple and plain language. Avoid the use of uncertain or unclear expressions.  
• The findings of the study must be expressed in an objective and unbiased manner.  While it is acceptable to correlate certain findings , it is best to avoid over-interpreting the results. In addition, avoid using subjective or emotional words , such as “interestingly” or “unfortunately”, to describe the results as this may cause readers to doubt the objectivity of the paper.  
• The content balances simplicity with comprehensiveness . For statistical data, simply describe the relevant tests and explain their results without mentioning raw data. If the study involves multiple hypotheses, describe the results for each one separately to avoid confusion and aid understanding. To enhance credibility, e nsure that negative results , if any, are included in this section, even if they do not support the research hypothesis.  
• Wherever possible, use illustrations like tables, figures, charts, or other visual representations to highlight the results of your research paper. Mention these illustrations in the text, but do not repeat the information that they convey ¹ .  

Difference between data, results, and discussion sections  

Data ,  results,  and  discussion  sections all communicate the findings of a study, but each serves a distinct purpose with varying levels of interpretation.   

In the  results section , one cannot provide data without interpreting its relevance or make statements without citing data ² . In a sense, the  results section  does not draw connections between different data points. Therefore, there is a certain level of interpretation involved in drawing results out of data.

(The example is intended to showcase how the visual elements and text in the results section complement each other ³ . The academic viewpoints included in the illustrative screenshots should not be used as references.)  

The discussion section allows authors even more interpretive freedom compared to the results section. Here, data and patterns within the data are compared with the findings from other studies to make more generalized points. Unlike the results section , which focuses purely on factual data, the discussion section touches upon hypothetical information, drawing conjectures and suggesting future directions for research.  

The ‘ Results’ section serves as the core of a research paper, capturing readers’ attention and providing insights into the study’s essence. Regardless of the subject of your research paper, a well-written results section can generate interest in your research. By following the tips outlined here, you can create a results section that effectively communicates your finding and invites further exploration. Remember, clarity is the key, and with the right approach, your results section can guide readers through the intricacies of your research.  

Professionals at Elsevier Language Services know the secret to writing a well-balanced results section. With their expert suggestions, you can ensure that your findings come across clearly to the reader. To maximize your chances of publication, reach out to Elsevier Language Services today !  

Type in wordcount for Standard Total: USD EUR JPY Follow this link if your manuscript is longer than 12,000 words. Upload

Reference  

• Cetin, S., & Hackam, D. J. (2005). An approach to the writing of a scientific manuscript. Journal of Surgical Research, 128(2), 165–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2005.07.002  
• Bahadoran, Z., Mirmiran, P., Zadeh-Vakili, A., Hosseinpanah, F., & Ghasemi, A. (2019). The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Results. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism/International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism., In Press (In Press). https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.92113  
• Guo, J., Wang, J., Zhang, P., Wen, P., Zhang, S., Dong, X., & Dong, J. (2024). TRIM6 promotes glioma malignant progression by enhancing FOXO3A ubiquitination and degradation. Translational Oncology, 46, 101999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2024.101999  

Writing a good review article

Why is data validation important in research?

You may also like.

Submission 101: What format should be used for academic papers?

Page-Turner Articles are More Than Just Good Arguments: Be Mindful of Tone and Structure!

A Must-see for Researchers! How to Ensure Inclusivity in Your Scientific Writing

Make Hook, Line, and Sinker: The Art of Crafting Engaging Introductions

Can Describing Study Limitations Improve the Quality of Your Paper?

A Guide to Crafting Shorter, Impactful Sentences in Academic Writing

6 Steps to Write an Excellent Discussion in Your Manuscript

How to Write Clear and Crisp Civil Engineering Papers? Here are 5 Key Tips to Consider

Input your search keywords and press Enter.

• Affiliate Program

• UNITED STATES
• 台灣 (TAIWAN)
• TÜRKIYE (TURKEY)
• Academic Editing Services
• - Research Paper
• - Journal Manuscript
• - Dissertation
• - College & University Assignments
• Admissions Editing Services
• - Application Essay
• - Personal Statement
• - Recommendation Letter
• - Cover Letter
• - CV/Resume
• Business Editing Services
• - Business Documents
• - Report & Brochure
• - Website & Blog
• Writer Editing Services
• - Script & Screenplay
• Our Editors
• Client Reviews
• Editing & Proofreading Prices
• Wordvice Points
• Partner Discount
• Plagiarism Checker
• APA Citation Generator
• MLA Citation Generator
• Chicago Citation Generator
• Vancouver Citation Generator
• - APA Style
• - MLA Style
• - Chicago Style
• - Vancouver Style
• Writing & Editing Guide
• Academic Resources
• Admissions Resources

How to Write the Results/Findings Section in Research

What is the research paper Results section and what does it do?

The Results section of a scientific research paper represents the core findings of a study derived from the methods applied to gather and analyze information. It presents these findings in a logical sequence without bias or interpretation from the author, setting up the reader for later interpretation and evaluation in the Discussion section. A major purpose of the Results section is to break down the data into sentences that show its significance to the research question(s).

The Results section appears third in the section sequence in most scientific papers. It follows the presentation of the Methods and Materials and is presented before the Discussion section —although the Results and Discussion are presented together in many journals. This section answers the basic question “What did you find in your research?”

What is included in the Results section?

The Results section should include the findings of your study and ONLY the findings of your study. The findings include:

• Data presented in tables, charts, graphs, and other figures (may be placed into the text or on separate pages at the end of the manuscript)
• A contextual analysis of this data explaining its meaning in sentence form
• All data that corresponds to the central research question(s)
• All secondary findings (secondary outcomes, subgroup analyses, etc.)

If the scope of the study is broad, or if you studied a variety of variables, or if the methodology used yields a wide range of different results, the author should present only those results that are most relevant to the research question stated in the Introduction section .

As a general rule, any information that does not present the direct findings or outcome of the study should be left out of this section. Unless the journal requests that authors combine the Results and Discussion sections, explanations and interpretations should be omitted from the Results.

How are the results organized?

The best way to organize your Results section is “logically.” One logical and clear method of organizing research results is to provide them alongside the research questions—within each research question, present the type of data that addresses that research question.

Let’s look at an example. Your research question is based on a survey among patients who were treated at a hospital and received postoperative care. Let’s say your first research question is:

“What do hospital patients over age 55 think about postoperative care?”

This can actually be represented as a heading within your Results section, though it might be presented as a statement rather than a question:

Attitudes towards postoperative care in patients over the age of 55

Now present the results that address this specific research question first. In this case, perhaps a table illustrating data from a survey. Likert items can be included in this example. Tables can also present standard deviations, probabilities, correlation matrices, etc.

Following this, present a content analysis, in words, of one end of the spectrum of the survey or data table. In our example case, start with the POSITIVE survey responses regarding postoperative care, using descriptive phrases. For example:

“Sixty-five percent of patients over 55 responded positively to the question “ Are you satisfied with your hospital’s postoperative care ?” (Fig. 2)

Include other results such as subcategory analyses. The amount of textual description used will depend on how much interpretation of tables and figures is necessary and how many examples the reader needs in order to understand the significance of your research findings.

Next, present a content analysis of another part of the spectrum of the same research question, perhaps the NEGATIVE or NEUTRAL responses to the survey. For instance:

  “As Figure 1 shows, 15 out of 60 patients in Group A responded negatively to Question 2.”

After you have assessed the data in one figure and explained it sufficiently, move on to your next research question. For example:

  “How does patient satisfaction correspond to in-hospital improvements made to postoperative care?”

This kind of data may be presented through a figure or set of figures (for instance, a paired T-test table).

Explain the data you present, here in a table, with a concise content analysis:

“The p-value for the comparison between the before and after groups of patients was .03% (Fig. 2), indicating that the greater the dissatisfaction among patients, the more frequent the improvements that were made to postoperative care.”

Let’s examine another example of a Results section from a study on plant tolerance to heavy metal stress . In the Introduction section, the aims of the study are presented as “determining the physiological and morphological responses of Allium cepa L. towards increased cadmium toxicity” and “evaluating its potential to accumulate the metal and its associated environmental consequences.” The Results section presents data showing how these aims are achieved in tables alongside a content analysis, beginning with an overview of the findings:

“Cadmium caused inhibition of root and leave elongation, with increasing effects at higher exposure doses (Fig. 1a-c).”

The figure containing this data is cited in parentheses. Note that this author has combined three graphs into one single figure. Separating the data into separate graphs focusing on specific aspects makes it easier for the reader to assess the findings, and consolidating this information into one figure saves space and makes it easy to locate the most relevant results.

Following this overall summary, the relevant data in the tables is broken down into greater detail in text form in the Results section.

• “Results on the bio-accumulation of cadmium were found to be the highest (17.5 mg kgG1) in the bulb, when the concentration of cadmium in the solution was 1×10G2 M and lowest (0.11 mg kgG1) in the leaves when the concentration was 1×10G3 M.”

Captioning and Referencing Tables and Figures

Tables and figures are central components of your Results section and you need to carefully think about the most effective way to use graphs and tables to present your findings . Therefore, it is crucial to know how to write strong figure captions and to refer to them within the text of the Results section.

The most important advice one can give here as well as throughout the paper is to check the requirements and standards of the journal to which you are submitting your work. Every journal has its own design and layout standards, which you can find in the author instructions on the target journal’s website. Perusing a journal’s published articles will also give you an idea of the proper number, size, and complexity of your figures.

Regardless of which format you use, the figures should be placed in the order they are referenced in the Results section and be as clear and easy to understand as possible. If there are multiple variables being considered (within one or more research questions), it can be a good idea to split these up into separate figures. Subsequently, these can be referenced and analyzed under separate headings and paragraphs in the text.

To create a caption, consider the research question being asked and change it into a phrase. For instance, if one question is “Which color did participants choose?”, the caption might be “Color choice by participant group.” Or in our last research paper example, where the question was “What is the concentration of cadmium in different parts of the onion after 14 days?” the caption reads:

 “Fig. 1(a-c): Mean concentration of Cd determined in (a) bulbs, (b) leaves, and (c) roots of onions after a 14-day period.”

Steps for Composing the Results Section

Because each study is unique, there is no one-size-fits-all approach when it comes to designing a strategy for structuring and writing the section of a research paper where findings are presented. The content and layout of this section will be determined by the specific area of research, the design of the study and its particular methodologies, and the guidelines of the target journal and its editors. However, the following steps can be used to compose the results of most scientific research studies and are essential for researchers who are new to preparing a manuscript for publication or who need a reminder of how to construct the Results section.

Step 1 : Consult the guidelines or instructions that the target journal or publisher provides authors and read research papers it has published, especially those with similar topics, methods, or results to your study.

• The guidelines will generally outline specific requirements for the results or findings section, and the published articles will provide sound examples of successful approaches.
• Note length limitations on restrictions on content. For instance, while many journals require the Results and Discussion sections to be separate, others do not—qualitative research papers often include results and interpretations in the same section (“Results and Discussion”).
• Reading the aims and scope in the journal’s “ guide for authors ” section and understanding the interests of its readers will be invaluable in preparing to write the Results section.

Step 2 : Consider your research results in relation to the journal’s requirements and catalogue your results.

• Focus on experimental results and other findings that are especially relevant to your research questions and objectives and include them even if they are unexpected or do not support your ideas and hypotheses.
• Catalogue your findings—use subheadings to streamline and clarify your report. This will help you avoid excessive and peripheral details as you write and also help your reader understand and remember your findings. Create appendices that might interest specialists but prove too long or distracting for other readers.
• Decide how you will structure of your results. You might match the order of the research questions and hypotheses to your results, or you could arrange them according to the order presented in the Methods section. A chronological order or even a hierarchy of importance or meaningful grouping of main themes or categories might prove effective. Consider your audience, evidence, and most importantly, the objectives of your research when choosing a structure for presenting your findings.

Step 3 : Design figures and tables to present and illustrate your data.

• Tables and figures should be numbered according to the order in which they are mentioned in the main text of the paper.
• Information in figures should be relatively self-explanatory (with the aid of captions), and their design should include all definitions and other information necessary for readers to understand the findings without reading all of the text.
• Use tables and figures as a focal point to tell a clear and informative story about your research and avoid repeating information. But remember that while figures clarify and enhance the text, they cannot replace it.

Step 4 : Draft your Results section using the findings and figures you have organized.

• The goal is to communicate this complex information as clearly and precisely as possible; precise and compact phrases and sentences are most effective.
• In the opening paragraph of this section, restate your research questions or aims to focus the reader’s attention to what the results are trying to show. It is also a good idea to summarize key findings at the end of this section to create a logical transition to the interpretation and discussion that follows.
• Try to write in the past tense and the active voice to relay the findings since the research has already been done and the agent is usually clear. This will ensure that your explanations are also clear and logical.
• Make sure that any specialized terminology or abbreviation you have used here has been defined and clarified in the  Introduction section .

Step 5 : Review your draft; edit and revise until it reports results exactly as you would like to have them reported to your readers.

• Double-check the accuracy and consistency of all the data, as well as all of the visual elements included.
• Read your draft aloud to catch language errors (grammar, spelling, and mechanics), awkward phrases, and missing transitions.
• Ensure that your results are presented in the best order to focus on objectives and prepare readers for interpretations, valuations, and recommendations in the Discussion section . Look back over the paper’s Introduction and background while anticipating the Discussion and Conclusion sections to ensure that the presentation of your results is consistent and effective.
• Consider seeking additional guidance on your paper. Find additional readers to look over your Results section and see if it can be improved in any way. Peers, professors, or qualified experts can provide valuable insights.

One excellent option is to use a professional English proofreading and editing service  such as Wordvice, including our paper editing service . With hundreds of qualified editors from dozens of scientific fields, Wordvice has helped thousands of authors revise their manuscripts and get accepted into their target journals. Read more about the  proofreading and editing process  before proceeding with getting academic editing services and manuscript editing services for your manuscript.

As the representation of your study’s data output, the Results section presents the core information in your research paper. By writing with clarity and conciseness and by highlighting and explaining the crucial findings of their study, authors increase the impact and effectiveness of their research manuscripts.

For more articles and videos on writing your research manuscript, visit Wordvice’s Resources page.

Wordvice Resources

• How to Write a Research Paper Introduction 
• Which Verb Tenses to Use in a Research Paper
• How to Write an Abstract for a Research Paper
• How to Write a Research Paper Title
• Useful Phrases for Academic Writing
• Common Transition Terms in Academic Papers
• Active and Passive Voice in Research Papers
• 100+ Verbs That Will Make Your Research Writing Amazing
• Tips for Paraphrasing in Research Papers

• USC Libraries
• Research Guides

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper

• 7. The Results
• Purpose of Guide
• Design Flaws to Avoid
• Independent and Dependent Variables
• Glossary of Research Terms
• Reading Research Effectively
• Narrowing a Topic Idea
• Broadening a Topic Idea
• Extending the Timeliness of a Topic Idea
• Academic Writing Style
• Applying Critical Thinking
• Choosing a Title
• Making an Outline
• Paragraph Development
• Research Process Video Series
• Executive Summary
• The C.A.R.S. Model
• Background Information
• The Research Problem/Question
• Theoretical Framework
• Citation Tracking
• Content Alert Services
• Evaluating Sources
• Primary Sources
• Secondary Sources
• Tiertiary Sources
• Scholarly vs. Popular Resources
• Qualitative Methods
• Quantitative Methods
• Insiderness
• Using Non-Textual Elements
• Limitations of the Study
• Common Grammar Mistakes
• Writing Concisely
• Avoiding Plagiarism
• Footnotes or Endnotes?
• Further Readings
• Generative AI and Writing
• USC Libraries Tutorials and Other Guides
• Bibliography

The results section is where you report the findings of your study based upon the methodology [or methodologies] you applied to gather information. The results section should state the findings of the research arranged in a logical sequence without bias or interpretation. A section describing results should be particularly detailed if your paper includes data generated from your own research.

Annesley, Thomas M. "Show Your Cards: The Results Section and the Poker Game." Clinical Chemistry 56 (July 2010): 1066-1070.

Importance of a Good Results Section

When formulating the results section, it's important to remember that the results of a study do not prove anything . Findings can only confirm or reject the hypothesis underpinning your study. However, the act of articulating the results helps you to understand the problem from within, to break it into pieces, and to view the research problem from various perspectives.

The page length of this section is set by the amount and types of data to be reported . Be concise. Use non-textual elements appropriately, such as figures and tables, to present findings more effectively. In deciding what data to describe in your results section, you must clearly distinguish information that would normally be included in a research paper from any raw data or other content that could be included as an appendix. In general, raw data that has not been summarized should not be included in the main text of your paper unless requested to do so by your professor.

Avoid providing data that is not critical to answering the research question . The background information you described in the introduction section should provide the reader with any additional context or explanation needed to understand the results. A good strategy is to always re-read the background section of your paper after you have written up your results to ensure that the reader has enough context to understand the results [and, later, how you interpreted the results in the discussion section of your paper that follows].

Bavdekar, Sandeep B. and Sneha Chandak. "Results: Unraveling the Findings." Journal of the Association of Physicians of India 63 (September 2015): 44-46; Brett, Paul. "A Genre Analysis of the Results Section of Sociology Articles." English for Specific Speakers 13 (1994): 47-59; Go to English for Specific Purposes on ScienceDirect;Burton, Neil et al. Doing Your Education Research Project . Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2008; Results. The Structure, Format, Content, and Style of a Journal-Style Scientific Paper. Department of Biology. Bates College; Kretchmer, Paul. Twelve Steps to Writing an Effective Results Section. San Francisco Edit; "Reporting Findings." In Making Sense of Social Research Malcolm Williams, editor. (London;: SAGE Publications, 2003) pp. 188-207.

Structure and Writing Style

I.  Organization and Approach

For most research papers in the social and behavioral sciences, there are two possible ways of organizing the results . Both approaches are appropriate in how you report your findings, but use only one approach.

• Present a synopsis of the results followed by an explanation of key findings . This approach can be used to highlight important findings. For example, you may have noticed an unusual correlation between two variables during the analysis of your findings. It is appropriate to highlight this finding in the results section. However, speculating as to why this correlation exists and offering a hypothesis about what may be happening belongs in the discussion section of your paper.
• Present a result and then explain it, before presenting the next result then explaining it, and so on, then end with an overall synopsis . This is the preferred approach if you have multiple results of equal significance. It is more common in longer papers because it helps the reader to better understand each finding. In this model, it is helpful to provide a brief conclusion that ties each of the findings together and provides a narrative bridge to the discussion section of the your paper.

NOTE:   Just as the literature review should be arranged under conceptual categories rather than systematically describing each source, you should also organize your findings under key themes related to addressing the research problem. This can be done under either format noted above [i.e., a thorough explanation of the key results or a sequential, thematic description and explanation of each finding].

II.  Content

In general, the content of your results section should include the following:

• Introductory context for understanding the results by restating the research problem underpinning your study . This is useful in re-orientating the reader's focus back to the research problem after having read a review of the literature and your explanation of the methods used for gathering and analyzing information.
• Inclusion of non-textual elements, such as, figures, charts, photos, maps, tables, etc. to further illustrate key findings, if appropriate . Rather than relying entirely on descriptive text, consider how your findings can be presented visually. This is a helpful way of condensing a lot of data into one place that can then be referred to in the text. Consider referring to appendices if there is a lot of non-textual elements.
• A systematic description of your results, highlighting for the reader observations that are most relevant to the topic under investigation . Not all results that emerge from the methodology used to gather information may be related to answering the " So What? " question. Do not confuse observations with interpretations; observations in this context refers to highlighting important findings you discovered through a process of reviewing prior literature and gathering data.
• The page length of your results section is guided by the amount and types of data to be reported . However, focus on findings that are important and related to addressing the research problem. It is not uncommon to have unanticipated results that are not relevant to answering the research question. This is not to say that you don't acknowledge tangential findings and, in fact, can be referred to as areas for further research in the conclusion of your paper. However, spending time in the results section describing tangential findings clutters your overall results section and distracts the reader.
• A short paragraph that concludes the results section by synthesizing the key findings of the study . Highlight the most important findings you want readers to remember as they transition into the discussion section. This is particularly important if, for example, there are many results to report, the findings are complicated or unanticipated, or they are impactful or actionable in some way [i.e., able to be pursued in a feasible way applied to practice].

NOTE:   Always use the past tense when referring to your study's findings. Reference to findings should always be described as having already happened because the method used to gather the information has been completed.

III.  Problems to Avoid

When writing the results section, avoid doing the following :

• Discussing or interpreting your results . Save this for the discussion section of your paper, although where appropriate, you should compare or contrast specific results to those found in other studies [e.g., "Similar to the work of Smith [1990], one of the findings of this study is the strong correlation between motivation and academic achievement...."].
• Reporting background information or attempting to explain your findings. This should have been done in your introduction section, but don't panic! Often the results of a study point to the need for additional background information or to explain the topic further, so don't think you did something wrong. Writing up research is rarely a linear process. Always revise your introduction as needed.
• Ignoring negative results . A negative result generally refers to a finding that does not support the underlying assumptions of your study. Do not ignore them. Document these findings and then state in your discussion section why you believe a negative result emerged from your study. Note that negative results, and how you handle them, can give you an opportunity to write a more engaging discussion section, therefore, don't be hesitant to highlight them.
• Including raw data or intermediate calculations . Ask your professor if you need to include any raw data generated by your study, such as transcripts from interviews or data files. If raw data is to be included, place it in an appendix or set of appendices that are referred to in the text.
• Be as factual and concise as possible in reporting your findings . Do not use phrases that are vague or non-specific, such as, "appeared to be greater than other variables..." or "demonstrates promising trends that...." Subjective modifiers should be explained in the discussion section of the paper [i.e., why did one variable appear greater? Or, how does the finding demonstrate a promising trend?].
• Presenting the same data or repeating the same information more than once . If you want to highlight a particular finding, it is appropriate to do so in the results section. However, you should emphasize its significance in relation to addressing the research problem in the discussion section. Do not repeat it in your results section because you can do that in the conclusion of your paper.
• Confusing figures with tables . Be sure to properly label any non-textual elements in your paper. Don't call a chart an illustration or a figure a table. If you are not sure, go here .

Annesley, Thomas M. "Show Your Cards: The Results Section and the Poker Game." Clinical Chemistry 56 (July 2010): 1066-1070; Bavdekar, Sandeep B. and Sneha Chandak. "Results: Unraveling the Findings." Journal of the Association of Physicians of India 63 (September 2015): 44-46; Burton, Neil et al. Doing Your Education Research Project . Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2008;  Caprette, David R. Writing Research Papers. Experimental Biosciences Resources. Rice University; Hancock, Dawson R. and Bob Algozzine. Doing Case Study Research: A Practical Guide for Beginning Researchers . 2nd ed. New York: Teachers College Press, 2011; Introduction to Nursing Research: Reporting Research Findings. Nursing Research: Open Access Nursing Research and Review Articles. (January 4, 2012); Kretchmer, Paul. Twelve Steps to Writing an Effective Results Section. San Francisco Edit ; Ng, K. H. and W. C. Peh. "Writing the Results." Singapore Medical Journal 49 (2008): 967-968; Reporting Research Findings. Wilder Research, in partnership with the Minnesota Department of Human Services. (February 2009); Results. The Structure, Format, Content, and Style of a Journal-Style Scientific Paper. Department of Biology. Bates College; Schafer, Mickey S. Writing the Results. Thesis Writing in the Sciences. Course Syllabus. University of Florida.

Writing Tip

Why Don't I Just Combine the Results Section with the Discussion Section?

It's not unusual to find articles in scholarly social science journals where the author(s) have combined a description of the findings with a discussion about their significance and implications. You could do this. However, if you are inexperienced writing research papers, consider creating two distinct sections for each section in your paper as a way to better organize your thoughts and, by extension, your paper. Think of the results section as the place where you report what your study found; think of the discussion section as the place where you interpret the information and answer the "So What?" question. As you become more skilled writing research papers, you can consider melding the results of your study with a discussion of its implications.

Driscoll, Dana Lynn and Aleksandra Kasztalska. Writing the Experimental Report: Methods, Results, and Discussion. The Writing Lab and The OWL. Purdue University.

• << Previous: Insiderness
• Next: Using Non-Textual Elements >>
• Last Updated: Nov 26, 2024 10:33 AM
• URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide

How to Write the Results/Findings Section in Research Papers

Introduction

What is the results section of a research paper, what's the difference between the results section and the discussion section, what's the difference between results and findings, how do you report research findings, strategies for writing the findings section.

The results section of a research paper is where the research audience learns the outcomes of a study and it lays the groundwork for establishing the research's contribution to scientific knowledge. The challenge in qualitative research , however, is comprehensively yet concisely presenting the specific aspects of key findings. When the salient points of your qualitative data analysis cannot be easily reduced to tables and figures alone, how do you present the main findings in a way that persuades your research audience?

This article provides a comprehensive explanation of what constitutes a results or findings section in a paper to offer guidance for those who may be inexperienced writing research papers . This article outlines the place of a findings section in a research paper, and the different strategies employed when writing a findings section to reduce complex information down to a concise overview of a research study.

Most research papers follow a logical sequence to report on the various aspects of a study, from the introduction section to the discussion. This sequence outlines the research problem underpinning the study itself, then the methods employed and data collected, followed by a description of the analysis or organization of that data into a meaningful form that addresses the study's research questions .

From this description, the researcher presents the findings or results of this data analysis . The findings section illustrates and explains the key details or insights that the researcher identifies from the study. It is these findings that form the basis of the discussion that details the main takeaways of the research.

In other words, while other sections of a particular paper discuss the study's theoretical developments and contributions to scientific knowledge, the findings section lays out the evidentiary warrants that support those developments. Without this evidence, a research paper runs the risk of presenting unsupported opinions about theory and research.

The results section should show the key findings that you have identified from your data analysis , while the discussion section highlights how those findings address the research questions in your study. The discussion section is where the key theoretical developments and potential applications to real-world practice are proposed, but the findings provide the evidence that supports the proposals in the research paper .

In this sense, the presentation of your findings should focus primarily, if not exclusively, on what the data means based on the analysis you use to interpret the data . The implications of such data are best left to the discussion section.

As you collect articles for your literature review , you might notice that some papers have a results section while others have a findings section. In broad terms, there is no major difference as both sections typically follow the methods section of a research paper . Essentially, results or findings are what come as a result of analyzing raw data generated from the study in order to answer a research question .

However, the use of one term over another is sometimes field-specific or method-specific. Research results often come from experimental or quantitative data , both of which come with expectations of objective predictability. Such results are presented in tables and figures and then interpreted by the authors in prose to set up the argument for the significance of the research.

Research findings, on the other hand, are associated with phenomena that are observed. In naturalistic inquiry, research methods such as ethnography and document analysis seldom, if ever, produce predictable and ordered results. Rather, they sample what is found in the real world and provide the basis for a report on what occurred in a given research setting.

Imagine a simple experiment where one plant is given water while a similar plant is given fertilizer and water. The results would describe the differences in the rate of growth between these two plants in a manner that guides recommendations about how to grow plants. With rare or unforeseen exceptions, these results are meant to be predictable and suggest a logical sequence that leads to successful plant growth.

In contrast, think about how an education research project, for example, might collect data through observations and interviews . This data might provide findings about how a teacher can be successful in connecting with their students to promote learning. Note that these findings do not guarantee the same results in other settings, given the situated nature of classroom teaching and learning and the potential differences between teachers and students. They only suggest a potential relationship between what a teacher does and how their students might benefit as a result.

Understanding this difference thus makes it easier to see where you will find a results section and where you will find a findings section. The physical and natural sciences, where you are more likely to find experimental studies and statistical analyses, expect results that are ordered and predictable. Researchers in the social sciences and humanities, where ethnographic research, interviews, and focus groups are more common, will opt for findings over results.

What are key findings?

Those who are skilled writing research papers understand the task of choosing the most relevant results from the raw data while presenting the research in a transparent manner. In research disciplines that rely on qualitative research methods, it's impossible to present all of the data collected from even a single study. When interview transcripts or field notes can run into dozens of pages, writers are faced with the challenge of choosing which segments of data should be represented in a findings section.

These segments of data are meant to explain and support the study's key themes or findings. In data coding and data analysis, a successful researcher has the responsibility of sorting through the data and separating the key findings from the whole body of data.

Do more with your data with ATLAS.ti

Cutting-edge artificial intelligence tools support crafting insightful research from your data. Try it out with a free trial.

Reporting research findings in a journal-style scientific paper is a matter of choosing the most relevant results organized in a way that sets up the ensuing discussion. This is a challenge with qualitative data that is unstructured in nature and vast in scope.

When dealing with large amounts of data, along with the word limits found in academic writing, there are a number of accepted practices that qualitative researchers employ to present their findings in a meaningful way.

Most qualitative studies rely on the coding of raw data. By annotating the data with short but descriptive keywords or key phrases, a researcher can provide structure to the data to identify key themes and patterns relevant to the research question at hand. Presenting these codes in your findings is thus a matter of describing those themes and detailing how the data highlights those themes.

Depending on your research questions, detailing your codebook in a findings section can be a matter of, among other things, showing the most prevalent codes or the patterns of codes as applied to the data. After you have coded your data and grouped codes according to themes, you can conduct a thematic analysis to determine the most prevalent themes to describe the aspects of the concept or phenomenon you're analyzing. Methods such as discourse analysis and narrative analysis also look at the combinations or sequences of codes to generate useful findings. In that case, qualitative data analysis software can help researchers determine the prevalence of such patterns, providing evidence for the assertions about the data collected.

Researchers rely on tables and visualizations such as heat maps and Sankey diagrams to summarize an analysis of codes in a findings section. These figures are often followed by a systematic description of the themes and patterns in the data and what meanings they point out to help address the study's research questions.

Data that comes directly from research participants can oftentimes be more powerful than the researcher's descriptions of that data. If your research paper includes data generated from observations or interviews , then excerpts of that data can prove more persuasive as evidence given its authentic nature. For example, in a presentation of an interview study where researchers are given open access, nursing research and its insights can be made more credible when the perspectives and opinions of nursing practitioners are directly presented to the research audience.

Field notes can also be presented in findings as data that supports the critical insights of the study. Ethnographic research can produce useful observations documented at the time of data collection that can provide a basis for reflection in the findings section. In either case, excerpts of qualitative data in a findings section are often followed by the researcher's descriptions of those excerpts and the rationale for why they serve as useful evidence supporting the study's claims.

Anthropological and sociological research often relies on the storytelling aspects of academic writing. It can be a significant challenge to capture an entire culture or social practice in a single segment of data or even a set of separate themes. In such cases, past-tense narratives can convey a holistic sense of the qualitative data to allow readers to immerse themselves in the culture that was observed.

The important point about writing narratives in a paper is that they should describe the salient parts of the data that address the research questions in addition to the context that helps the research audience understand the main findings. When constructing a narrative, it can become easy to lead the audience on a series of tangents that can prove confusing or unhelpful. You can craft a powerful narrative that contributes to scientific knowledge as long as it provides the necessary evidence for your claims while leaving out aspects that can turn out to be irrelevant to your research inquiry.

Figures and tables

To be clear, the findings section in a qualitative research paper cannot easily be reduced to a series of simple data visualizations alone, especially in research fields that depend on narratives to convey the important findings of a study. That said, overlooking the visual elements of a paper, particularly in social science research, can limit opportunities in highlighting evidentiary warrants supporting your claims.

Visualizations include networks, word clouds, heat maps, flowcharts, and Sankey diagrams, among others, all of which can restructure raw data in a form that your research audience can quickly and easily understand. Tables are also included in this discussion as they help to reduce large amounts of qualitative data into compact summaries. Even in social science disciplines that rely heavily on qualitative methods and naturalistic inquiry, statistical analyses and presentations of frequencies can serve a useful purpose in understanding patterns and tendencies. The common thread across all of these visualizations is that they complement the prose or written descriptions of your key findings.

A successful presentation of the main findings should set the stage for an engaging discussion section where readers become convinced of the main takeaways of the research. Where discussion sections are about persuasion, findings provide the necessary evidentiary warrants that ultimately make the arguments in the discussion persuasive.

With this in mind, there are a number of broad strategies to consider when presenting your findings.

Adopt the style of the field

Every research field has their own particular style for highlighting the salient points of a study. Research in economics will focus on statistics, relying on tables and figures to make important assertions about the meaning of the raw data . Cultural anthropology, on the other hand, seldom captures statistical data, opting instead for narratives and artifacts to get at the essence of a culture or community. Other fields have their own unique circumstances that dictate the accepted writing practices among researchers in each discipline.

As a result, you will benefit from reading research similar to the study you want to present, not merely for the findings they highlight but also the style in which they present those findings. Matching the tone and style of similar scholars in your field will resonate with your peer reviewers and eventually your research audience.

Provide the necessary context

Every scientific discipline requires the researcher to describe their research setting, the data or resources they are studying, and the means through which they study them. This task is especially challenging within the social sciences as researchers observe some social phenomenon in some social setting, neither of which is perfectly replicable.

As a result, reporting background information necessary to understanding a segment of data is important to persuading your research audience of the salience and relevance of your findings. Whether you're presenting narratives or packaging qualitative data in excerpts or tables, you will still need to describe the context surrounding your data in prose to make the findings accessible to your research audience.

Establish research transparency

Beginning researchers may make the mistake of only presenting the good points of their findings, ignoring negative results from their own research while overemphasizing data that demonstrates promising trends but may not show the entire picture of the phenomenon being studied. Because of this, readers of research may be skeptical of unsupported claims. By extension, they may also look for all of the potential aspects that influence a concept or phenomenon which might confound or contextualize the claims made in the findings.

Transparency is thus an important part of the research writing process, demanding that researchers qualify their findings with important caveats worth considering. These caveats will often be found in the discussion section, where limitations of the study are outlined. However, describing contextual details in the findings can help your research audience assess the persuasive power of the evidentiary warrants you are using to support your claims.

Write clearly and consistently

Scientific theory, even in the social sciences, often employs specific jargon and technical terms. The background and discussion sections, where theory is the main focus, will often employ field-specific language that may not be accessible to researchers unfamiliar with the field. A compelling findings section, on the other hand, requires the researcher to make the findings easily understood by their research audience.

Oftentimes, this means using clear language that is accessible to readers of research who may not have a specific expertise but general interest in the topic you are studying. As a result, be sure to limit the technical or theoretical language you employ in the findings section to only what is necessary. Doing so can ground the readers in a clear understanding of the data, making for a more engaging discussion section that is more credible with its claims more readily acceptable as scientific knowledge.

Powerful data analysis starts with ATLAS.ti

Organize data files and employ powerful tools for critical insights all in one project. See how with a free trial.

• Langson Library
• Science Library
• Grunigen Medical Library
• Law Library
• Connect From Off-Campus
• Accessibility
• Gateway Study Center

Email this link

Writing a scientific paper.

• Writing a lab report
• INTRODUCTION

Writing a "good" results section

Figures and Captions in Lab Reports

"Results Checklist" from: How to Write a Good Scientific Paper. Chris A. Mack. SPIE. 2018.

Additional tips for results sections.

• LITERATURE CITED
• Bibliography of guides to scientific writing and presenting
• Peer Review
• Presentations
• Lab Report Writing Guides on the Web

This is the core of the paper. Don't start the results sections with methods you left out of the Materials and Methods section. You need to give an overall description of the experiments and present the data you found.

• Factual statements supported by evidence. Short and sweet without excess words
• Present representative data rather than endlessly repetitive data
• Discuss variables only if they had an effect (positive or negative)
• Use meaningful statistics
• Avoid redundancy. If it is in the tables or captions you may not need to repeat it

A short article by Dr. Brett Couch and Dr. Deena Wassenberg, Biology Program, University of Minnesota

• Present the results of the paper, in logical order, using tables and graphs as necessary.
• Explain the results and show how they help to answer the research questions posed in the Introduction. Evidence does not explain itself; the results must be presented and then explained. 
• Avoid: presenting results that are never discussed;  presenting results in chronological order rather than logical order; ignoring results that do not support the conclusions; 
• Number tables and figures separately beginning with 1 (i.e. Table 1, Table 2, Figure 1, etc.).
• Do not attempt to evaluate the results in this section. Report only what you found; hold all discussion of the significance of the results for the Discussion section.
• It is not necessary to describe every step of your statistical analyses. Scientists understand all about null hypotheses, rejection rules, and so forth and do not need to be reminded of them. Just say something like, "Honeybees did not use the flowers in proportion to their availability (X2 = 7.9, p<0.05, d.f.= 4, chi-square test)." Likewise, cite tables and figures without describing in detail how the data were manipulated. Explanations of this sort should appear in a legend or caption written on the same page as the figure or table.
• You must refer in the text to each figure or table you include in your paper.
• Tables generally should report summary-level data, such as means ± standard deviations, rather than all your raw data.  A long list of all your individual observations will mean much less than a few concise, easy-to-read tables or figures that bring out the main findings of your study.  
• Only use a figure (graph) when the data lend themselves to a good visual representation.  Avoid using figures that show too many variables or trends at once, because they can be hard to understand.

From:  https://writingcenter.gmu.edu/guides/imrad-results-discussion

• << Previous: METHODS
• Next: DISCUSSION >>
• Last Updated: Sep 27, 2024 12:38 PM
• URL: https://guides.lib.uci.edu/scientificwriting

Off-campus? Please use the Software VPN and choose the group UCIFull to access licensed content. For more information, please Click here

Software VPN is not available for guests, so they may not have access to some content when connecting from off-campus.