rutherford's gold foil experiment established that

Why Does Water Expand When It Freezes

Gold Foil Experiment

Faraday Cage
Oil Drop Experiment
Magnetic Monopole
Why Do Fireflies Light Up
Types of Blood Cells With Their Structure, and Functions
The Main Parts of a Plant With Their Functions
Parts of a Flower With Their Structure and Functions
Parts of a Leaf With Their Structure and Functions
Why Does Ice Float on Water
Why Does Oil Float on Water
How Do Clouds Form
What Causes Lightning
How are Diamonds Made
Types of Meteorites
Types of Volcanoes
Types of Rocks

Who did the Gold Foil Experiment?

The gold foil experiment was a pathbreaking work conducted by scientists Hans Geiger and Ernest Marsden under the supervision of Nobel laureate physicist Ernest Rutherford that led to the discovery of the proper structure of an atom . Known as the Geiger-Marsden experiment, it was performed at the Physical Laboratories of the University of Manchester between 1908 and 1913.

The prevalent atomic theory at the time of the research was the plum pudding model that was developed by Lord Kelvin and further improved by J.J. Thomson. According to the theory, an atom was a positively charged sphere with the electrons embedded in it like plums in a Christmas pudding.

With neutrons and protons yet to be discovered, the theory was derived following the classical Newtonian Physics. However, in the absence of experimental proof, this approach lacked proper acceptance by the scientific community.

What is the Gold Foil Experiment?

Description.

The method used by scientists included the following experimental steps and procedure. They bombarded a thin gold foil of thickness approximately 8.6 x 10 -6 cm with a beam of alpha particles in a vacuum. Alpha particles are positively charged particles with a mass of about four times that of a hydrogen atom and are found in radioactive natural substances. They used gold since it is highly malleable, producing sheets that can be only a few atoms thick, thereby ensuring smooth passage of the alpha particles. A circular screen coated with zinc sulfide surrounded the foil. Since the positively charged alpha particles possess mass and move very fast, it was hypothesized that they would penetrate the thin gold foil and land themselves on the screen, producing fluorescence in the part they struck.

Like the plum pudding model, since the positive charge of atoms was evenly distributed and too small as compared to that of the alpha particles, the deflection of the particulate matter was predicted to be less than a small fraction of a degree.

Observation

Though most of the alpha particles behaved as expected, there was a noticeable fraction of particles that got scattered by angles greater than 90 degrees. There were about 1 in every 2000 particles that got scattered by a full 180 degree, i.e., they retraced their path after hitting the gold foil.

Simulation of Rutherford’s Gold Foil Experiment Courtesy: University of Colorado Boulder

The unexpected outcome could have only one explanation – a highly concentrated positive charge at the center of an atom that caused an electrostatic repulsion of the particles strong enough to bounce them back to their source. The particles that got deflected by huge angles passed close to the said concentrated mass. Most of the particles moved undeviated as there was no obstruction to their path, proving that the majority of an atom is empty.

In addition to the above, Rutherford concluded that since the central core could deflect the dense alpha particles, it shows that almost the entire mass of the atom is concentrated there. Rutherford named it the “nucleus” after experimenting with various gases. He also used materials other than gold for the foil, though the gold foil version gained the most popularity.

He further went on to reject the plum pudding model and developed a new atomic structure called the planetary model. In this model, a vastly empty atom holds a tiny nucleus at the center surrounded by a cloud of electrons. As a result of his gold foil experiment, Rutherford’s atomic theory holds good even today.

Rutherford’s Atomic Model

Rutherford’s Gold Foil Experiment Animation

Rutherford demonstrated his experiment on bombarding thin gold foil with alpha particles contributed immensely to the atomic theory by proposing his nuclear atomic model.
The nuclear model of the atom consists of a small and dense positively charged interior surrounded by a cloud of electrons.
The significance and purpose of the gold foil experiment are still prevalent today. The discovery of the nucleus paved the way for further research, unraveling a list of unknown fundamental particles.
Chemed.chem.purdue.edu
Chem.libretexts.org
Large.stanford.edu
Radioa ctivity.eu.com

Article was last reviewed on Friday, February 3, 2023

5 responses to “Gold Foil Experiment”

Super very much helpful to me,clear explanation about every act done by our Rutherford that is under different sub headings ,which is very much clear to ,to study .very much thanks to the science facts.com.thank u so much.

Good explanation,very helpful ,thank u ,so much

very clear and helpful, perfect for my science project!

Thank you for sharing the interactive program on the effects of the type of atom on the experiment! Looking forward to sharing this with my ninth graders!

Rutherford spearheaded with a team of scientist in his experiment of gold foil to capture the particles of the year 1911. It’s the beginning of explaining particles that float and are compacted . Rutherford discovered this atom through countless experiments which was the revolutionary discovery of the atomic nuclear . Rutherford name the atom as a positive charge and the the center is the nucleus.

Barack Hussein Obama

Mrs. Danize Obama

Join our Newsletter

Fill your E-mail Address

Related Worksheets

Structure of Atom
Size Of The Nucleus

Rutherford's Experiment - Size of the Nucleus

Introduction

Understanding the fundamental structure of matter is essential to Physics. Figuring out the size of the nucleus, which is the crux of this article, would not be possible without the Rutherford gold foil experiment. The Rutherford model of the atom was the first correct interpretation of the atom, and it laid the groundwork for Bohr to build his interpretation.

Rutherford Gold Foil Experiment

Before Rutherford’s experiment, the best model of the atom that was known to us was the Thomson or “plum pudding” model. In this model, the atom was believed to consist of a positive material “pudding” with negative “plums” distributed throughout. Later, Rutherford’s alpha-particle scattering experiment changed our perception of the atomic structure. Rutherford directed beams of alpha particles at thin gold foil to test this model and noted how the alpha particles scattered from the foil.

In the experiment, Rutherford showed us that the atom was mainly empty space with the nucleus at the centre and electrons revolving around it. When alpha particles were fired towards the gold foil, Rutherford noticed that 1 in 20000 particles underwent a change in direction of motion of more than 90 degrees. The rest 19999 particles deviated from their trajectory by a very small margin. This led to the conclusion that the atom consisted of an empty space with most of the mass concentrated at the centre in tiny volumes. This volume at the centre was named ‘the nucleus’; Latin for ‘little nut’.

Through this experiment, Rutherford made 3 observations as follows:

Highly charged alpha particles went straight through the foil undeflected. This would have been the expected result for all of the particles if the plum pudding model was correct.
Some alpha particles were deflected back through large angles.
A very small number of alpha particles were deflected backwards! To this, Rutherford remarked, “It was as incredible as if you fired a 15-inch shell at a piece of tissue paper, and it came back at you!”

To explain these observations, a new model of the atom was needed. In the new model, the positive material was considered to be concentrated in a small but massive region called the nucleus. Electrons were considered to be revolving around the nucleus, preventing one atom from trespassing on its neighbour’s space to complete this model.

Size of the Nucleus

It was possible to obtain the size of the nucleus through Rutherford’s experiment. We can calculate the size of the nucleus, by obtaining the point of closest approach of an alpha particle. By shooting alpha particles of kinetic energy 5.5 MeV, the point of closest approach was estimated to be about 4×10 -14 m. Since the repulsive force acting here is Coulomb repulsion, there is no contact. This means that the size of the nucleus is smaller than 4×10 -14 m.

The sizes of the nuclei of various elements have been accurately measured after conducting many more iterations of the experiment. Having done this, a formula to measure the size of the nucleus was determined.

\(\begin{array}{l}R = R_0 A^{\frac{1}{3}}\end{array} \)

Where R 0 = 1.2×10 -15 m.

From the formula, we can conclude that the volume of the nucleus, which is proportional to R 3 , is proportional to A (mass number). Another thing to be noticed in the equation is that there is no mention of density in the equation. This is because the density of the nuclei does not vary with elements. The density of the nucleus is approximately 2.3×10 17 kg.m -3 .

Frequently Asked Questions – FAQs

What did rutherford’s gold foil experiment teach us about the atomic structure.

Rutherford’s gold foil experiment showed us that the atom is mostly empty space with a comparatively tiny, massive, positively charged nucleus in the centre.

What caused the alpha particles to deflect in Rutherford’s gold-foil experiment?

Rutherford thought that the particles would fly straight through the foil. However, he found that the particle’s path would be shifted or deflected when passing through the foil. This is because like charges repel each other.

How did Rutherford’s experiment affect our world?

Rutherford’s experiment gave us a better, more practical understanding of matter. The experiment provided conclusive evidence against previous conceptions of matter and provided a new model consistent with the facts.

Why gold foil is used in Rutherford experiment?

Gold foil is used because of its elevated malleability in Rutherford’s ray scattering experiment. The very thin gold foil is used in the experiment, and gold can be shaped into very thin films.

How did Rutherford’s experiment work?

The Rutherford Gold Foil experiment fired at a thin layer of gold with minute particles. A small proportion of the particles have been observed to have been deflected, while a remainder has gone through the layer. This led Rutherford to infer that at its core, the mass of an atom was concentrated.

You might want to read the following articles

Bohr’s Model Of An Atom
Rutherford Atomic Model
Thomson’s Atomic Model

Stay tuned with BYJU’S for more such interesting articles. Also, register to “BYJU’S – The Learning App” for loads of interactive, engaging Physics-related videos and unlimited academic assistance.

Put your understanding of this concept to test by answering a few MCQs. Click ‘Start Quiz’ to begin!

Select the correct answer and click on the “Finish” button Check your score and answers at the end of the quiz

Visit BYJU’S for all Physics related queries and study materials

Your result is as below

Request OTP on Voice Call

Register with BYJU'S & Download Free PDFs

What is the 'Gold Foil Experiment'? The Geiger-Marsden experiments explained

Physicists got their first look at the structure of the atomic nucleus.

The gold foil experiments gave physicists their first view of the structure of the atomic nucleus and the physics underlying the everyday world.

J.J. Thomson model of the atom

Gold foil experiments, rutherford model of the atom.

The real atomic model

Additional Resources

Bibliography.

The Geiger-Marsden experiment, also called the gold foil experiment or the α-particle scattering experiments, refers to a series of early-20th-century experiments that gave physicists their first view of the structure of the atomic nucleus and the physics underlying the everyday world. It was first proposed by Nobel Prize -winning physicist Ernest Rutherford.

As familiar as terms like electron, proton and neutron are to us now, in the early 1900s, scientists had very little concept of the fundamental particles that made up atoms .

In fact, until 1897, scientists believed that atoms had no internal structure and believed that they were an indivisible unit of matter. Even the label "atom" gives this impression, given that it's derived from the Greek word "atomos," meaning "indivisible."

But that year, University of Cambridge physicist Joseph John Thomson discovered the electron and disproved the concept of the atom being unsplittable, according to Britannica . Thomson found that metals emitted negatively charged particles when illuminated with high-frequency light.

His discovery of electrons also suggested that there were more elements to atomic structure. That's because matter is usually electrically neutral; so if atoms contain negatively charged particles, they must also contain a source of equivalent positive charge to balance out the negative charge.

By 1904, Thomson had suggested a "plum pudding model" of the atom in which an atom comprises a number of negatively charged electrons in a sphere of uniform positive charge, distributed like blueberries in a muffin.

The model had serious shortcomings, however — primarily the mysterious nature of this positively charged sphere. One scientist who was skeptical of this model of atoms was Rutherford, who won the Nobel Prize in chemistry for his 1899 discovery of a form of radioactive decay via α-particles — two protons and two neutrons bound together and identical to a helium -4 nucleus, even if the researchers of the time didn't know this.

Rutherford's Nobel-winning discovery of α particles formed the basis of the gold foil experiment, which cast doubt on the plum pudding model. His experiment would probe atomic structure with high-velocity α-particles emitted by a radioactive source. He initially handed off his investigation to two of his protégés, Ernest Marsden and Hans Geiger, according to Britannica .

Rutherford reasoned that if Thomson's plum pudding model was correct, then when an α-particle hit a thin foil of gold, the particle should pass through with only the tiniest of deflections. This is because α-particles are 7,000 times more massive than the electrons that presumably made up the interior of the atom.

Here, an illustration of Rutherford's particle scattering device used in his gold foil experiment.

Marsden and Geiger conducted the experiments primarily at the Physical Laboratories of the University of Manchester in the U.K. between 1908 and 1913.

The duo used a radioactive source of α-particles facing a thin sheet of gold or platinum surrounded by fluorescent screens that glowed when struck by the deflected particles, thus allowing the scientists to measure the angle of deflection.

The research team calculated that if Thomson's model was correct, the maximum deflection should occur when the α-particle grazed an atom it encountered and thus experienced the maximum transverse electrostatic force. Even in this case, the plum pudding model predicted a maximum deflection angle of just 0.06 degrees.

Of course, an α-particle passing through an extremely thin gold foil would still encounter about 1,000 atoms, and thus its deflections would be essentially random. Even with this random scattering, the maximum angle of refraction if Thomson's model was correct would be just over half a degree. The chance of an α-particle being reflected back was just 1 in 10^1,000 (1 followed by a thousand zeroes).

Yet, when Geiger and Marsden conducted their eponymous experiment, they found that in about 2% of cases, the α-particle underwent large deflections. Even more shocking, around 1 in 10,000 α-particles were reflected directly back from the gold foil.

Rutherford explained just how extraordinary this result was, likening it to firing a 15-inch (38 centimeters) shell (projectile) at a sheet of tissue paper and having it bounce back at you, according to Britannica

Extraordinary though they were, the results of the Geiger-Marsden experiments did not immediately cause a sensation in the physics community. Initially, the data were unnoticed or even ignored, according to the book "Quantum Physics: An Introduction" by J. Manners.

The results did have a profound effect on Rutherford, however, who in 1910 set about determining a model of atomic structure that would supersede Thomson's plum pudding model, Manners wrote in his book.

The Rutherford model of the atom, put forward in 1911, proposed a nucleus, where the majority of the particle's mass was concentrated, according to Britannica . Surrounding this tiny central core were electrons, and the distance at which they orbited determined the size of the atom. The model suggested that most of the atom was empty space.

When the α-particle approaches within 10^-13 meters of the compact nucleus of Rutherford's atomic model, it experiences a repulsive force around a million times more powerful than it would experience in the plum pudding model. This explains the large-angle scatterings seen in the Geiger-Marsden experiments.

Later Geiger-Marsden experiments were also instrumental; the 1913 tests helped determine the upper limits of the size of an atomic nucleus. These experiments revealed that the angle of scattering of the α-particle was proportional to the square of the charge of the atomic nucleus, or Z, according to the book "Quantum Physics of Matter," published in 2000 and edited by Alan Durrant.

In 1920, James Chadwick used a similar experimental setup to determine the Z value for a number of metals. The British physicist went on to discover the neutron in 1932, delineating it as a separate particle from the proton, the American Physical Society said .

What did the Rutherford model get right and wrong?

Yet the Rutherford model shared a critical problem with the earlier plum pudding model of the atom: The orbiting electrons in both models should be continuously emitting electromagnetic energy, which would cause them to lose energy and eventually spiral into the nucleus. In fact, the electrons in Rutherford's model should have lasted less than 10^-5 seconds.

Another problem presented by Rutherford's model is that it doesn't account for the sizes of atoms.

Despite these failings, the Rutherford model derived from the Geiger-Marsden experiments would become the inspiration for Niels Bohr 's atomic model of hydrogen , for which he won a Nobel Prize in Physics .

Bohr united Rutherford's atomic model with the quantum theories of Max Planck to determine that electrons in an atom can only take discrete energy values, thereby explaining why they remain stable around a nucleus unless emitting or absorbing a photon, or light particle.

Thus, the work of Rutherford, Geiger (who later became famous for his invention of a radiation detector) and Marsden helped to form the foundations of both quantum mechanics and particle physics.

Rutherford's idea of firing a beam at a target was adapted to particle accelerators during the 20th century. Perhaps the ultimate example of this type of experiment is the Large Hadron Collider near Geneva, which accelerates beams of particles to near light speed and slams them together.

See a modern reconstruction of the Geiger-Marsden gold foil experiment conducted by BackstageScience and explained by particle physicist Bruce Kennedy .
Find out more about the Bohr model of the atom which would eventually replace the Rutherford atomic model.
Rutherford's protege Hans Gieger would eventually become famous for the invention of a radioactive detector, the Gieger counter. SciShow explains how they work .

Thomson's Atomic Model , Lumens Chemistry for Non-Majors,.

Rutherford Model, Britannica, https://www.britannica.com/science/Rutherford-model

Alpha particle, U.S NRC, https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/basic-ref/glossary/alpha-particle.html

Manners. J., et al, 'Quantum Physics: An Introduction,' Open University, 2008.

Durrant, A., et al, 'Quantum Physics of Matter,' Open University, 2008

Ernest Rutherford, Britannica , https://www.britannica.com/biography/Ernest-Rutherford

Niels Bohr, The Nobel Prize, https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1922/bohr/facts/

House. J. E., 'Origins of Quantum Theory,' Fundamentals of Quantum Mechanics (Third Edition) , 2018

Sign up for the Live Science daily newsletter now

Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.

Robert Lea is a science journalist in the U.K. who specializes in science, space, physics, astronomy, astrophysics, cosmology, quantum mechanics and technology. Rob's articles have been published in Physics World, New Scientist, Astronomy Magazine, All About Space and ZME Science. He also writes about science communication for Elsevier and the European Journal of Physics. Rob holds a bachelor of science degree in physics and astronomy from the U.K.’s Open University

'Gravity waves' from Hurricane Helene seen rippling through the sky in new NASA images

'Hawking radiation' may be erasing black holes. Watching it happen could reveal new physics.

Neuroscientists taught rats to drive tiny cars. They took them out on 'joy rides.'