literature review on reflective practice in teaching

• Help & FAQ

Doing it differently? A review of literature on teaching reflective practice across health and social care professions

Research output : Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Reflective approaches have been increasingly adopted in health and social care education. However, how reflective practice is taught in and between professional courses differs extensively. This review of literature identified and categorised literature available on teaching reflective practice in health and social care and compared this with what was available interprofessionally and multiprofessionally. Limited examples comparing how reflective practice is taught in different professions were found. This lack of empirical data has implications for both the teaching and researching of professional practice.

• healthcare professions
• interprofessional
• multiprofessional
• reflective practice

Access to Document

• 10.1080/14623943.2012.670628

Other files and links

• Link to publication in Scopus

Fingerprint

• Healthcare Keyphrases 100%
• Social Care Keyphrases 100%
• Reflective Practice Keyphrases 100%
• Healthcare Professions Keyphrases 100%
• Health and Social Care Social Sciences 100%
• Professional Occupations Social Sciences 100%
• Occupation (Patient Social Context) Nursing and Health Professions 100%
• Professional Practice Nursing and Health Professions 50%

T1 - Doing it differently?

T2 - A review of literature on teaching reflective practice across health and social care professions

AU - Norrie, Caroline

AU - Hammond, John

AU - D'Avray, Lynda

AU - Collington, Valentina

AU - Fook, Jan

PY - 2012/8

Y1 - 2012/8

N2 - Reflective approaches have been increasingly adopted in health and social care education. However, how reflective practice is taught in and between professional courses differs extensively. This review of literature identified and categorised literature available on teaching reflective practice in health and social care and compared this with what was available interprofessionally and multiprofessionally. Limited examples comparing how reflective practice is taught in different professions were found. This lack of empirical data has implications for both the teaching and researching of professional practice.

AB - Reflective approaches have been increasingly adopted in health and social care education. However, how reflective practice is taught in and between professional courses differs extensively. This review of literature identified and categorised literature available on teaching reflective practice in health and social care and compared this with what was available interprofessionally and multiprofessionally. Limited examples comparing how reflective practice is taught in different professions were found. This lack of empirical data has implications for both the teaching and researching of professional practice.

KW - healthcare professions

KW - interprofessional

KW - multiprofessional

KW - reflective practice

KW - teaching

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863631087&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14623943.2012.670628

DO - 10.1080/14623943.2012.670628

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84863631087

SN - 1462-3943

JO - Reflective Practice

JF - Reflective Practice

Change Password

Your password must have 8 characters or more and contain 3 of the following:.

• a lower case character, 
• an upper case character, 
• a special character 

Password Changed Successfully

Your password has been changed

• Sign in / Register

Request Username

Can't sign in? Forgot your username?

Enter your email address below and we will send you your username

If the address matches an existing account you will receive an email with instructions to retrieve your username

Reflective Practices in Education: A Primer for Practitioners

• Haleigh Machost
• Marilyne Stains

Department of Chemistry, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903

Search for more papers by this author

Reflective practices in education are widely advocated for and have become important components of professional reviews. The advantages of reflective practices are many; however, the literature often focuses on the benefits to students, rather than the benefits for the educators themselves. Additionally, the extant literature concerning reflective practices in education is laden with conflicting terminology and complex studies, which can inhibit educators’ understanding of reflective practices and prevent their adoption. As such, this Essay serves as a primer for educators beginning reflective practices. It briefly describes the benefits to educators and different classifications and modalities of reflection and examines some of the challenges that educators may encounter.

INTRODUCTION

“Reflection” has become a buzzword in academia and has vast array of implications across fields, disciplines, and subdisciplines. When considering reflection about teaching practices, John Dewey, a psychologist and philosopher who was heavily influential in educational reform, provides a relevant description: reflection is ‘‘the active, persistent and careful consideration of any belief or supposed form of knowledge in the light of the grounds that support it and the further conclusions to which it tends” ( Dewey, 1933 , p. 9). The act of reflection in this context is meant to indicate a process , with Dewey highlighting the necessity of active thinking when encountering obstacles and problems. In less philosophical phrasing, reflection entails considering past or present experiences, learning from the outcomes observed, and planning how to better approach similar situations in the future. Consequently, Dewey suggests that educators embark on a journey of continual improvement when engaging in reflective practices. This is in stark contrast to how reflection is used in higher education. For many educators, the only time they engage in reflection is when they are asked to write documents that are used to evaluate whether they should be promoted, receive a raise, or be granted tenure. Reflection, within an evaluation framework, can be counterproductive and prevent meaningful reflections due to perceptions of judgment ( Brookfield, 2017 ).

This gap may result from the particular adaptation of reflections by some academics. The origin of reflective practices lies not in the realm of academia, but rather in professional training. It is often traced back to Donald Schön’s instrumental 1983 work The Reflective Practitioner , which, while aimed at his target audience of nonacademic professionals, has become foundational for reflective practices in teaching ( Munby and Russell, 1989 ).

In the varied topography of professional practice, there is a high, hard ground where practitioners can make effective use of research-based theory and technique, and there is a swampy lowland where situations are confusing “messes” incapable of technical solution. The difficulty is that the problems of the high ground, however great their technical interest, are often relatively unimportant to clients or to the larger society, while in the swamp are the problems of greatest human concern. ( Schön, 1983 , p. 42)

Schön’s work on the education of various professionals gained traction, as he diverged from common norms of the time. In particular, he disagreed with separating knowledge and research from practice, and methods from results ( Schön, 1983 ; Newman, 1999 ). In doing so, he advocated for practical as well as technical knowledge, enabling professionals to develop greater competency in the real-world situations they encounter. Research in the ensuing decades focused on both gaining evidence for the effectiveness of reflective practices ( Dervent, 2015 ; Zahid and Khanam, 2019 ) and understanding the obstacles that can prevent reflective practices from being adopted ( Davis, 2003 ; Sturtevant and Wheeler, 2019 ).

This Essay is not intended to provide a comprehensive review of this work for use by education researchers; rather, the goal of this Essay is to provide a guide, grounded in this literature, to inform beginning reflective practitioners about the benefits of reflections, the different types of reflections that one can engage in, practical advice for engaging in reflective practices, and the potential challenges and corresponding solutions when engaging in reflective practices. It is also intended as a resource for professional development facilitators who are interested in infusing reflective practice within their professional development programs.

WHY SHOULD I ENGAGE IN REFLECTIVE PRACTICES?

Perhaps the best place to begin when discussing reflective practices is with the question “Why do people do it?” It is common to conceptualize reflection about teaching situations as a way to help “fix” any problems or issues that present themselves ( Brookfield, 2017 ). However, this view is counterproductive to the overarching goal of reflective practices—to continually improve one’s own efficacy and abilities as an educator. Similar to how there is always a new, more efficient invention to be made, there is always room for improvement by even the most experienced and well-loved educators. People choose to be educators for any number of personal reasons, but often the grounding desire is to help inform, mentor, or guide the next generation. With such a far-reaching aim, educators face many obstacles, and reflective practices are one tool to help mitigate them.

Classrooms are an ever-changing environment. The students change, and with that comes new generational experiences and viewpoints. Updates to technology provide new opportunities for engaging with students and exploring their understanding. New curricula and pedagogical standards from professional organizations, institutions, or departments can fundamentally alter the modes of instruction and the concepts and skills being taught. As described by Brookfield, reflection can act as a “gyroscope,” helping educators stay balanced amid a changing environment ( 2017 , p. 81). Through the process of reflection, practitioners focus on what drives them to teach and their guiding principles, which define how they interact with both their students and their peers. Furthermore, reflective practitioners are deliberately cognizant of the reasoning behind their actions, enabling them to act with more confidence when faced with a sudden or difficult situation ( Brookfield, 2017 ). In this way, reflection can help guide educators through the challenging times they may experience in their careers.

One such obstacle is imposter syndrome, which is all too familiar for many educators ( Brems et al. , 1994 ; Parkman, 2016 ; Collins et al. , 2020 ). It is a sense that, despite all efforts put in—the knowledge gained, the relationships formed, and the lives changed—what one does is never enough and one does not belong. These feelings often lead to a fear of being “discovered as a fraud or non-deserving professional, despite their demonstrated talent and achievements” ( Chrousos and Mentis, 2020 , p. 749). A part of reflective practices that is often overlooked is the consideration of everything that goes well . While it is true that reflective practitioners are aware of areas for improvement in their teaching, it is also true that they acknowledge, celebrate, and learn from good things that happen in their classrooms and in their interactions with students and peers. As such, they are more consciously aware of their victories, even if those victories happen to be small ( Brookfield, 2017 ). That is not to say that reflective practices are a cure-all for those dealing with imposter syndrome, but reflections can be a reminder that their efforts are paying off and that someone, whether it be students, peers, or even the practitioner themselves, is benefiting from their actions. Furthermore, reflecting on difficult situations has the potential for individuals to realize the extent of their influence ( Brookfield, 2017 ).

In a similar vein, reflective practices can help educators realize when certain expectations or cultural norms are out of their direct ability to address. For example, educators cannot be expected to tackle systemic issues such as racism, sexism, and ableism alone. Institutions must complement educators’ efforts through, for example, establishment of support systems for students excluded because of their ethnicity or race and the implementation of data-driven systems, which can inform the institutions’ and educators’ practices. Thus, through reflections, educators can avoid “self-laceration” ( Brookfield, 2017 , p. 86) and feelings of failure when the problems experienced are multifaceted.

In addition to alleviating “self-laceration,” developing reflective practice and reflective practitioners has been identified as one of four dominant change strategies in the literature ( Henderson et al. , 2011 ). Specifically, developing reflective practitioners is identified as a strategy that empowers individual educators to enact change ( Henderson et al. , 2011 ). One avenue for such change comes with identifying practices that are harmful to students. Reflecting on teaching experiences and student interactions can allow educators to focus on things such as whether an explanatory metaphor is accessible to different types of students in the class (e.g., domestic and international students), if any particular group of students do not work well together, and whether the curriculum is accessible for students from varied educational and cultural backgrounds. Thus, through the process of reflection, educators grow in their ability to help their students on a course level, and they are better positioned to advocate on their students’ behalf when making curricular decisions on a departmental or institutional level.

An additional part of reflection is gathering feedback to enable a holistic view of one’s teaching practices. When feedback is given by a trusted peer, this invaluable information can guide chosen teaching methods and ways of explaining new information. When feedback is given by students and that feedback is then acted upon, it demonstrates to the students that their opinions and experiences are taken seriously and fosters a more trusting environment ( Brookfield, 2017 ). Furthermore, when discrepancies arise between the intention of the teacher and the interpretation of the students, reflection also aids practitioners in verbalizing their reasoning. Through reflection, educators would need to consider past experiences, prior knowledge, and beliefs that led to their actions. As such, reflective practitioners are able to have honest and informed discussions with their students who may be confused or unhappy with a particular decision. Explaining this to students not only models the practice of continuous inquiry and of considering one’s actions, but it also allows students to understand the rationale behind decisions they may not personally agree with, fostering a more productive student–teacher relationship ( Brookfield, 2017 ).

WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF REFLECTION?

This section aims to summarize and clarify the different ways reflection has been conceptualized in the literature ( Table 1 ). Specifically, reflections have been described based on their timing, depth, and content. Notably, practitioners of reflective practices must utilize multiple types of reflection in order to more effectively improve different aspects of their teaching ( Griffiths and Tann, 1992 ).

Time-Dependent

To understand the time-dependent conceptualization of reflection, we return to Schön (1983 ). He defines two particular concepts—“reflection-in-action” and “reflection-on-action”—which are delineated based on the time that the reflection takes place. Reflection-in-action is characterized as practitioners reflecting while simultaneously completing the relevant action. Reflection-on-action encompasses a practitioner reflecting on a past action, analyzing the different influences, and carefully considering the observed or potential outcomes. Reflection-in-action is perceived as more difficult due to the multiple factors that teachers have to consider at once while also ensuring that the lesson carries on.

Later work built on this initial description of time-dependent reflections. In particular, Loughran renamed the original two timings to make them more intuitive and added one time point ( Loughran, 2002a ). The three categories include: “anticipatory,” “contemporaneous,” and “retrospective,” wherein actions taken, or to be taken, are contemplated before, during, and after an educating experience, respectively. It should be noted that both Loughran’s and Schön’s models are able to function in tandem with the depth- or content-based understandings of reflections, which are described in the next sections.

Depth of Reflections

Conceptualizing reflection in terms of depth has a long history in the literature (see Section 5.1 in the Supplemental Material for a historical view of the depth-based model of reflections). Thankfully, Larrivee (2008a) designed a depth-classification system that encompasses an array of terminologies and explanations pre-existing in the literature. This classification includes a progression in reflective practices across four levels: “pre-reflection,” “surface,” “pedagogical,” and “critical reflection.”

During the pre-reflection stage, educators do not engage in reflections. They are functioning in “survival mode” ( Larrivee, 2008a , p. 350; Campoy, 2010 , p. 17), reacting automatically to situations without considering alternatives and the impacts on the students ( Larrivee, 2008a ; Campoy, 2010 ). At this stage, educators may feel little agency, consider themselves the victims of coincidental circumstances, or attribute the ownership of problems to others such as their students, rather than themselves ( Larrivee, 2008a ; Campoy, 2010 ). They are unlikely to question the status quo, thereby failing to consider and adapt to the needs of the various learners in their classrooms ( Larrivee, 2008a ; Campoy, 2010 ). While the description of educators at this level is non-ideal, educators at the pre-reflection level are not ill intended. However, the pre-reflective level is present among practitioners, as evidenced in a 2015 study investigating 140 English as a Foreign Language educators and a 2010 analysis of collected student reflections ( Campoy, 2010 ; Ansarin et al. , 2015 ). The presence of pre-reflective educators is also readily apparent in the authors’ ongoing research. As such, being aware of the pre-reflection stage is necessary for beginning practitioners, and this knowledge is perhaps most useful for designers of professional development programs.

The first true level of reflection is surface reflection. At this level, educators are concerned about achieving a specific goal, such as high scores on standardized tests. However, these goals are only approached through conforming to departmental norms, evidence from their own experiences, or otherwise well-established practices ( Larrivee, 2008a ). In other words, educators at this level question whether the specific pedagogical practices will achieve their goals, but they do not consider any new or nontraditional pedagogical practices or question the current educational policies ( Campoy, 2010 ). Educators’ reflections are grounded in personal assumptions and influenced by individuals’ unexamined beliefs and unconscious biases.

At the pedagogical level, educators “reflect on educational goals, the theories underlying approaches, and the connections between theoretical principles and practice.” ( Larrivee, 2008a , p. 343). At this level, educators also consider their own belief systems and how those systems relate to their practices and explore the problem from different perspectives. A representative scenario at this level includes: teachers contemplating their various teaching methods and considering their observed outcomes in student comprehension, alternative viewpoints, and also the current evidence-based research in education. Subsequently, they alter (or maintain) their previous teaching practices to benefit the students. In doing so, more consideration is given to possible factors than in surface reflection. This category is quite broad due to the various definitions present in the literature ( Larrivee, 2008a ). However, there is a common emphasis on the theory behind teaching practices, ensuring that practice matches theory, and the student outcomes of enacted teaching practices ( Larrivee, 2008a ).

The last level of reflection categorized by Larrivee is critical reflection, wherein educators consider the ethical, moral, and political ramifications of who they are and what they are teaching to their students ( Larrivee, 2008a ). An approachable way of thinking about critical reflection is that the practitioners are challenging their assumptions about what is taught and how students learn. In doing so, educators evaluate their own views, assertions, and assumptions about teaching, with attention paid to how such beliefs impact students both as learners and as individuals ( Larrivee, 2005 , 2008b ). Through practicing critical reflection, societal issues that affect teaching can be uncovered, personal views become evidence based rather than grounded in assumptions, and educators are better able to help a diverse student population.

Larrivee used this classification to create a tool for measuring the reflectivity of teachers (see Section 4.1 of the Supplemental Material).

Content of Reflections

The third type of reflection is one in which what is being reflected on is the defining feature. One such example is Valli’s five types of reflection ( 1997 ): “technical reflection,” “reflection-in and on-action,” “deliberative reflection,” “personalistic reflection,” and “critical reflection.” Note that Valli’s conceptions of the two types of reflection—reflection-in and on-action, and critical reflection—are congruent with the descriptions provided in the Time-Dependent and Depth sections of this Essay , respectively, and will thus not be detailed in this section.

In a technical reflection, educators evaluate their instructional practices in light of the findings from the research on teaching and learning ( Valli, 1997 ). The quality of this type of reflection is based on the educators’ knowledge of this body of work and the extent to which their teaching practices adhere to it. For example, educators would consider whether they are providing enough opportunities for their students to explain their reasoning to one another during class. This type of reflection does not focus on broader topics such as the structure and content of the curriculum or issues of equity.

Deliberative reflection encompasses “a whole range of teaching concerns, including students, the curriculum, instructional strategies, the rules and organization of the classroom” ( Valli, 1997 , p. 75). In this case, “deliberative” comes from the practitioners having to debate various external viewpoints and perspectives or research that maybe be in opposition. As such, they have an internal deliberation when deciding on the best actions for their specific teaching situations. The quality of the reflection is based on the educators’ ability to evaluate the various perspectives and provide sound reasoning for their decisions.

Personalistic reflection involves educators’ personal growth as well as the individual relationships they have with their students. Educators engaged in this type of reflection thoughtfully explore the relationships between their personal and professional goals and consider the various facets of students’ lives with the overarching aim of providing the best experience. The quality of the reflection is based on an educator’s ability to empathize.

To manage the limitations of each type of reflections, Valli recommended that reflective practitioners not focus solely on a specific type of reflection, but rather engage with multiple types of reflections, as each addresses different questions. It is important to note that some types of reflections may be prerequisite to others and that some may be more important than others; for example, Valli stated that critical reflections are more valuable than technical reflections, as they address the important issues of justice. The order of Valli’s types of reflection provided in Table 1 reflects her judgment on the importance of the questions that each type of reflection addresses.

HOW CAN I ENGAGE IN REFLECTION?

Larrivee suggested that there is not a prescribed strategy to becoming a reflective practitioner but that there are three practices that are necessary: 1) carving time out for reflection, 2) constantly problem solving, and 3) questioning the status quo ( Larrivee, 2000 ). This section of the Essay provides a buffet of topics for consideration and methods of organization that support these three practices. This section is intended to assist educators in identifying their preferred mode of reflection and to provide ideas for professional development facilitators to explicitly infuse reflective practices in their programs.

For educators who are new to reflective practices, it is useful to view the methods presented as “transforming what we are already doing, first and foremost by becoming more aware of ourselves, others, and the world within which we live” ( Rodgers and Laboskey, 2016 , p. 101) rather than as a complete reformation of current methods.

Focus of the Reflection: Critical Incident

When practicing reflection, a critical incident may be identified or presented in order to ignite the initial reflection or to foster deeper thought by practitioners ( Tripp, 2011 ). Critical incidents are particular situations that become the focus of reflections. Farrell described critical incidents in education as unplanned events that hold the potential to highlight misconceptions and foster greater and newer understanding about teaching and learning ( 2008 ). These can be situations ranging from students not understanding a foundational concept from a previous course to considering how to navigate the analysis of a data set that includes cultural background and socioeconomic status.

Critical incidents are used, because meaningful reflection is often a result of educators experiencing a problem or some form of cognitive dissonance concerning teaching practices and approaches to their students ( Lee, 2005 ). Therefore, it is most effective to combine techniques, which are outlined later in this section, with a critical incident to force practitioners into a new and difficult positions relating to education. Larrivee details that a sense of “uncertainty, dissonance, dilemma, problem, or conflict” is extremely valuable to personal reflection and growth ( 2008b , p. 93). Thus, unsettling experiences encourage changes to action far more than reflecting on typical teaching/learning interactions. This is an inherently uncomfortable experience for the practitioner, as feelings of self-doubt, uncertainty, anger, and self- or peer-rejection can come to the surface ( Larrivee, 2008b ). Yet, it is when educators are in an uncomfortable position that they are best able to challenge their learned assertions about what they are teaching and how they are supporting their students’ learning. This requires a conscious effort on the part of the educator. Humans tend to function automatically based on their past experiences and ingrained beliefs. This results in certain aspects of events being ignored while others become the driving force behind reactions. In a sense, humans have a “filter system” that can unconsciously eliminate the most effective course of action; this results in humans functioning in a cycle in which current, unquestioned beliefs determine which data and experiences are given attention ( Larrivee, 2000 , p. 295).

Critical incidents highlight any dissonance present in one’s actions, enabling practitioners to tackle social, ethical, political, and pedagogical issues that may be systemic to their departments, their fields, or their cultures. Critical incidents foster critical reflection (under the depth- and content-based models) even in novice teachers ( Pultorak, 1996 ; Griffin, 2003 ). It is because of the difficulty and uncertainty posed by critical incidents that they are widely promoted as an invaluable aspect of reflective practices in education. Therefore, the analysis of critical incidents, whether they are case studies or theoretical examples, has been used in educating both pre-service ( Griffin, 2003 ; Harrison and Lee, 2011 ) and current educators ( Benoit, 2013 ).

Scaffoldings Promoting Reflections

Once a critical incident has been identified, the next step is structuring the reflection itself. Several scaffolding models exist in the literature and are described in Section 3 of the Supplemental Material. As reflections are inherently personal, educators should use the scaffolding that works best for them. Two scaffoldings that have been found to be useful in developing reflective practices are Bain’s 5R and Gibbs’s reflective cycle.

Reporting involves considering a particular experience and the contextual factors that surround it.

Responding is when the individual practitioners verbalize their feelings, thoughts, and other reactions that they had in response to the situation.

Relating is defined as teachers making connections between what occurred recently and their previously obtained knowledge and skill base.

Reasoning then encourages the practitioners to consider the foundational concepts and theories, as well as other factors that they believe to be significant, in an effort to understand why a certain outcome was achieved or observed.

Finally, reconstructing is when the teachers take their explanations and uses them to guide future teaching methods, either to encourage a similar result or to foster a different outcome.

This framework facilitates an understanding of what is meant by and required for reflective practices. For a full explanation of Bain’s scaffolding and associated resources, see Sections 1.2 and 3.3 in the Supplemental Material.

Description: The practitioner first describes the situation to be reflected on in detail.

Feelings: The practitioner then explores their feelings and thoughts processes during the situation.

Evaluation: The practitioner identifies what went well and what went wrong.

Analysis: The practitioner makes sense of the situation by exploring why certain things went well while others did not.

Conclusions: The practitioner summarizes what they learned from their analysis of the situation.

Personal action plans: The practitioner develops a plan for what they would do in a similar situation in the future and what other steps they need to take based on what they learn (e.g., gain some new skills or knowledge).

For a full explanation of Gibbs’s scaffolding and associated resources, see Sections 1.3 and 3.4 in the Supplemental Material.

We see these two models as complementary and have formulated a proposed scaffolding for reflection by combining the two models. In Table 2 , we provide a short description of each step and examples of reflective statements. The full scaffolding is provided in Section 3.6 of the Supplemental Material.

a An expanded version is provided in Section 3.6 of the Supplemental Material.

Even with the many benefits of these scaffolds, educators must keep in mind the different aspects and levels of reflection that should be considered. Especially when striving for higher levels of reflection, the cultural, historical, and political contexts must be considered in conjunction with teaching practices for such complex topics to affect change ( Campoy, 2010 ). For instance, if equity and effectiveness of methods are not contemplated, there is no direct thought about how to then improve those aspects of practice.

Modalities for Reflections

The different scaffolds can be implemented in a wide variety of practices ( Table 3 ). Of all the various methods of reflection, reflective writing is perhaps the most often taught method, and evidence has shown that it is a deeply personal practice ( Greiman and Covington, 2007 ). Unfortunately, many do not continue with reflective writing after a seminar or course has concluded ( Jindal‐Snape and Holmes, 2009 ). This may be due to the concern of time required for the physical act of writing. In fact, one of the essential practices for engaging in effective reflections is creating a space and time for personal, solitary reflection ( Larrivee, 2000 ); this is partially due to the involvement of “feelings of frustration, insecurity, and rejection” as “taking solitary time helps teachers come to accept that such feelings are a natural part of the change process” while being in a safe environment ( Larrivee, 2000 , p. 297). It is important to note that reflective writing is not limited to physically writing in a journal or typing into a private document; placing such a limitation may contribute to the practice being dropped, whereas a push for different forms of reflection will keep educators in practice ( Dyment and O'Connell, 2014 ). Reflective writings can include documents such as case notes ( Jindal‐Snape and Holmes, 2009 ), reviewing detailed lesson plans ( Posthuma, 2012 ), and even blogging ( Alirio Insuasty and Zambrano Castillo, 2010 ; van Wyk, 2013 ; Garza and Smith, 2015 ).

The creation of a blog or other online medium can help foster reflection. In addition to fostering reflection via the act of writing on an individual level, this online form of reflective writing has several advantages. One such benefit is the readily facilitated communication and collaboration between peers, either through directly commenting on a blog post or through blog group discussions ( Alirio Insuasty and Zambrano Castillo, 2010 ; van Wyk, 2013 ; Garza and Smith, 2015 ). “The challenge and support gained through the collaborative process is important for helping clarify beliefs and in gaining the courage to pursue beliefs” ( Larrivee, 2008b , p. 95). By allowing other teachers to comment on published journal entries, a mediator role can be filled by someone who has the desired expertise but may be geographically distant. By this same logic, blogs have the great potential to aid teachers who themselves are geographically isolated.

Verbal reflections through video journaling (vlogs) follows the same general methods as writing. This method has the potential to be less time intensive ( Clarke, 2009 ), which may lower one of the barriers facing practitioners. Greiman and Covington (2007) identified verbal reflection as one of the three preferred modalities of reflection by student teachers. By recording their verbal contemplations and reflections, practitioners can review their old thoughts about different course materials, enabling them to adjust their actions based on reflections made when observations were fresh in their mind. Students learning reflective practices also noted that recorded videos convey people’s emotions and body language—reaching a complexity that is not achievable with plain text or audio ( Clarke, 2009 ).

If writing or video journaling is not appealing, another method to facilitate reflective practices is that of making video recordings of teaching experiences in vivo. This differs from vlogs, which are recorded after the teaching experiences. A small longitudinal qualitative study indicated that the video recordings allowed participants to be less self-critical and to identify effective strategies they were employing ( Jindal‐Snape and Holmes, 2009 ). Additionally, beginning teachers found the most value in videotaping their teaching as compared with electronic portfolios and online discussions ( Romano and Schwartz, 2005 ). By recording their teaching practices, practitioners can use a number of clearly outlined self- and peer-assessments, as detailed in Section 4 of the Supplemental Material. However, it should be noted that all three technology-driven methods used in the study by Romano and Schwartz (2005) were helpful for the participants, and as reflective practices are inherently personal, many methods should be considered by practitioners new to purposeful reflection.

Group efforts, such as group discussions or community meetings, can foster reflective thinking, thereby encouraging reflective practices. “The checks and balances of peers’ and critical friends’ perspectives can help developing teachers recognize when they may be devaluing information or using self-confirming reasoning, weighing evidence with a predisposition to confirm a belief or theory, rather than considering alternative theories that are equally plausible” ( Larrivee, 2008b , p. 94). These benefits are essential to help educators reach the higher levels of reflection (i.e., pedagogical reflection and critical reflection), as it can be difficult to think of completely new viewpoints on one’s own, especially when educators are considering the needs of diverse students yet only have their own experiences to draw upon. Henderson et. al . (2011) review of the literature found that successful reports of developing reflective practitioners as a strategy for change had two commonalities. One of these was the presence of either a community where experiences are shared ( Gess-Newsome et al. , 2003 ; Henderson et al. , 2011 ) or of an additional participant providing feedback to the educator ( Penny and Coe, 2004 ; McShannon and Hynes, 2005 ; Henderson et al. , 2011 ). The second commonality was the presence of support by a change agent ( Hubball et al. , 2005 ; Henderson et al. , 2011 ), which is far more context reliant.

Even in the absence of change agent support, peer observation can be implemented as a tool for establishing sound reflective practices. This can be accomplished through informal observations followed by an honest discussion. It is vital for the correct mindset to be adopted during such a mediation session, as the point of reflection is in assessing the extent to which practitioners’ methods allow them to achieve their goals for student learning. This cannot be done in an environment where constructive feedback is seen as a personal critique. For example, it was found that peers who simply accepted one another’s practices out of fear of damaging their relationships did not benefit from peer observation and feedback ( Manouchehri, 2001 ); however, an initially resistant observer was able to provide valuable feedback after being prompted by the other participant ( Manouchehri, 2001 ). One approach to ensure the feedback promotes reflections is for the observer and participant to meet beforehand and have a conversation about areas on which to focus feedback. The follow-up conversation focuses first on these areas and can be expanded afterward to other aspects of the teaching that the observer noticed. Observation protocols (provided in Section 4.2 in the Supplemental Material) can also be employed in these settings to facilitate the focus of the reflection.

For those interested in assessing their own or another’s reflection, Section 4 in the Supplemental Material will be helpful, as it highlights different tools that have been shown to be effective and are adaptable to different situations.

WHAT BARRIERS MIGHT I FACE?

It is typical for educators who are introducing new practices in their teaching to experience challenges both at the personal and contextual levels ( Sturtevant and Wheeler, 2019 ). In this section, we address the personal and contextual barriers that one may encounter when engaging in reflective practices and provide advice and recommendations to help address these barriers. We also aim to highlight that the difficulties faced are commonly shared by practitioners embarking on the complex journey of becoming reflective educators.

Personal Barriers

Professional development facilitators who are interested in supporting their participants’ growth as reflective practitioners will need to consider: 1) the misunderstandings that practitioners may have about reflections and 2) the need to clearly articulate the purpose and nature of reflective practices. Simply asking practitioners to reflect will not lead to desirable results ( Loughran, 2002b ). Even if the rationale and intent is communicated, there is also the pitfall of oversimplification. Practitioners may stop before the high levels of reflection (e.g., critical reflection) are reached due to a lack of in-depth understanding of reflective practices ( Thompson and Pascal, 2012 ). Even if the goals are understood and practitioners intend to evaluate their teaching practices on the critical level, there can still be confusion about what reflective practices require from practitioners. The theory of reflective practices may be grasped, but it is not adequately integrated into how practitioners approach teaching ( Thompson and Pascal, 2012 ). We hope that this Essay and associated Supplemental Material provide a meaningful resource to help alleviate this challenge.

A concern often raised is that the level of critical reflection is not being reached ( Ostorga, 2006 ; Larrivee, 2008a ). Considering the impacts that student–teacher interactions have on students beyond the classroom is always a crucial part of being an educator. In terms of practicality, situations being considered may not be conducive to this type of reflection. Consider an educator who, after a formative assessment, realizes that students, regardless of ethnicity, nationality, or gender, did not grasp a foundational topic that is required for the rest of the course. In such a case, it is prudent to consider how the information was taught and to change instructional methods to adhere to research-based educational practices. If the information was presented in a lecture-only setting, implementing aspects of engagement, exploration, and elaboration on the subject by the students can increase understanding ( Eisenkraft, 2003 ). If the only interactions were student–teacher based and all work was completed individually, the incorporation of student groups could result in a deeper understanding of the material by having students act as teachers or by presenting students with alternative way of approaching problems (e.g., Michaelsen et al. , 1996 ). Both of these instructional changes are examples that can result from pedagogical reflection and are likely to have a positive impact on the students. As such, educators who practice any level of reflection should be applauded. The perseverance and dedication of practitioners cannot be undervalued, even if their circumstances lead to fewer instances of critical reflection. We suggest that communities of practice such as faculty learning communities, scholarship of teaching and learning organizations, or professional development programs are excellent avenues to support educators ( Baker et al. , 2014 ; Bathgate et al. , 2019 ; Yik et al. , 2022a , b ), including in the development of knowledge and skills required to reach critical reflections. For example, facilitators of these communities and programs can intentionally develop scaffolding and exercises wherein participants consider whether the deadlines and nature of assignments are equitable to all students in their courses. Professional development facilitators are strongly encouraged to be explicit about the benefits to individual practitioners concomitantly with the benefits to students (see Section 2 in the Supplemental Material), as benefits to practitioners are too often ignored yet comprise a large portion of the reasoning behind reflective practices.

At a practitioner’s level, the time requirement for participating in reflective practices is viewed as a major obstacle, and it would be disingenuous to discount this extensive barrier ( Greiman and Covington, 2007 ). Reflective practices do take time, especially when done well and with depth. However, we argue that engagement in reflective practice early on can help educators become more effective with the limited time they do have ( Brookfield, 2017 ). As educators engage in reflective practices, they become more aware of their reasoning, their teaching practices, the effectiveness of said practices, and whether their actions are providing them with the outcomes they desire ( Thompson and Pascal, 2012 ). Therefore, they are able to quickly and effectively troubleshoot challenges they encounter, increasing the learning experiences for their students. Finally, we argue that the consistent engagement in reflective practices can significantly facilitate and expedite the writing of documents necessary for annual evaluations and promotions. These documents often require a statement in which educators must evaluate their instructional strategies and their impact on students. A reflective practitioner would have a trail of documents that can easily be leveraged to write such statement.

Contextual Factors

Environmental influences have the potential to bring reflective practices to a grinding halt. A paradigm shift that must occur to foster reflective teacher: that of changing the teacher’s role from a knowledge expert to a “pedagogic expert” ( Day, 1993 ). As with any change of this magnitude, support is necessary across all levels of implementation and practitioners to facilitate positive change. Cole (1997) made two observations that encapsulate how institutions can prevent the implementation of reflective practices: first, many educators who engage in reflective practices do so secretly. Second, reflections are not valued in academic communities despite surface-level promotions for such teaching practices; institutions promote evidence-based teaching practices, including reflection, yet instructors’ abilities as educators do not largely factor into promotions, raises, and tenure ( Brownell and Tanner, 2012 ; Johnson et al. , 2018 ). The desire for educators to focus on their teaching can become superficial, with grants and publications mattering more than the results of student–teacher interactions ( Cole, 1997 ; Michael, 2007 ).

Even when teaching itself is valued, the act of changing teaching methods can be resisted and have consequences. Larrivee’s (2000) statement exemplifies this persistent issue:

Critically reflective teachers also need to develop measures of tactical astuteness that will enable them to take a contrary stand and not have their voices dismissed. One way to keep from committing cultural suicide is to build prior alliances both within and outside the institution by taking on tasks that demonstrate school loyalty and build a reputation of commitment. Against a history of organizational contributions, a teacher is better positioned to challenge current practices and is less readily discounted. (p. 298)

The notion that damage control must be a part of practicing reflective teaching is indicative of a system that is historically opposed to the implementation of critical reflection ( Larrivee, 2000 ). We view this as disheartening, as the goal of teaching should be to best educate one’s students. Even as reflective practices in teaching are slowly becoming more mainstream, contextual and on-site influences still have a profound impact on how teachers approach their profession ( Smagorinsky, 2015 ). There must be a widespread, internal push for change within departments and institutions for reflective practices to be easily and readily adopted.

The adoption of reflective practices must be done in a way that does not negate its benefits. For example, Galea (2012) highlights the negative effects of routinizing or systematizing this extremely individual and circumstance-based method (e.g., identification of specific areas to focus on, standardized timing and frequency of reflections). In doing so, the systems that purportedly support teachers using reflection remove their ability to think of creative solutions, limit their ability to develop as teachers, and can prevent an adequate response to how the students are functioning in the learning environment ( Tan, 2008 ). Effective reflection can be stifled when reflections are part of educators’ evaluations for contract renewal, funding opportunities, and promotions and tenure. Reflective practices are inherently vulnerable, as they involve both being critical of oneself and taking responsibility for personal actions ( Larrivee, 2008b ). Being open about areas for improvement is extremely difficult when it has such potential negative impacts on one’s career. However, embarking on honest reflection privately, or with trusted peers and mentors, can be done separately from what is presented for evaluation. We argue that reflections can support the writing of documents to be considered for evaluation, as these documents often request the educators to describe the evolution of their teaching and its impact on students. Throughout course terms, reflections conducted privately can provide concreate ideas for how to frame an evaluation document. We argue that administrators, department chairs, and members of tenure committees should be explicit with their educators about the advantages of reflective practices in preparing evaluative documents focused on teaching.

CONCLUDING THOUGHTS

Reflective practices are widely advocated for in academic circles, and many teaching courses and seminars include information regarding different methods of reflection. This short introduction intends to provide interested educators with a platform to begin reflective practices. Common methods presented may appeal to an array of educators, and various self- and peer-assessment tools are highlighted in Section 4 in the Supplemental Material. Reflective practices are a process and a time- and energy-intensive, but extremely valuable tool for educators when implemented with fidelity. Therefore, reflection is vital for efficacy as an educator and a requirement for educators to advance their lifelong journeys as learners.

To conclude, we thought the simple metaphor provided by Thomas Farrell best encapsulates our thoughts on reflective practices within the context of teaching: Reflective practices are “a compass of sorts to guide teachers when they may be seeking direction as to what they are doing in their classrooms. The metaphor of reflection as a compass enables teachers to stop, look, and discover where they are at that moment and then decide where they want to go (professionally) in the future” ( Farrell, 2012 , p. 7).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to thank Annika Kraft, Jherian Mitchell-Jones, Emily Kable, Dr. Emily Atieh, Dr. Brandon Yik, Dr. Ying Wang, and Dr. Lu Shi for their constructive feedback on previous versions of this article. This material is based upon work supported by NSF 2142045. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

• Alirio Insuasty, E., & Zambrano Castillo, L. C. ( 2010 ). Exploring reflective teaching through informed journal keeping and blog group discussion in the teaching practicum . Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development , 12 (2), 87–105. Google Scholar
• Ansarin, A. A., Farrokhi, F., & Rahmani, M. ( 2015 ). Iranian EFL teachers’ reflection levels: The role of gender, experience, and qualifications . Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics , 2 (2), 140–155. Google Scholar
• Ardian, P., Hariyati, R. T. S., & Afifah, E. ( 2019 ). Correlation between implementation case reflection discussion based on the Graham Gibbs Cycle and nurses’ critical thinking skills . Enfermeria Clinica , 29 , 588–593. Google Scholar
• Bain, J., Ballantyne, R., Mills, C., & Lester, N. ( 2002 ). Reflecting on practice: Student teachers’ perspectives . Flaxton, QLD, Australia: Post Pressed. Google Scholar
• Baker, L. A., Chakraverty, D., Columbus, L., Feig, A. L., Jenks, W. S., Pilarz, M., ... & Wesemann, J. L. ( 2014 ). Cottrell Scholars Collaborative New Faculty Workshop: Professional development for new chemistry faculty and initial assessment of its efficacy . Journal of Chemical Education , 91 (11), 1874–1881. Google Scholar
• Bathgate, M. E., Aragón, O. R., Cavanagh, A. J., Frederick, J., & Graham, M. J. ( 2019 ). Supports: A key factor in faculty implementation of evidence-based teaching . CBE—Life Sciences Education , 18 (2), ar22. Link ,  Google Scholar
• Benoit, A. ( 2013 ). Learning from the inside out: A narrative study of college teacher development [Doctoral Dissertation, Lesley University] . Graduate School of Education. https://digitalcommons.lesley.edu/education_dissertations/29 Google Scholar
• Brems, C., Baldwin, M. R., Davis, L., & Namyniuk, L. ( 1994 ). The imposter syndrome as related to teaching evaluations and advising relationships of university faculty members . Journal of Higher Education , 65 (2), 183–193. Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. D. ( 2017 ). Becoming a critically reflective teacher . Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Google Scholar
• Brownell, S. E., & Tanner, K. D. ( 2012 ). Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: Lack of training, time, incentives, and … tensions with professional identity? CBE—Life Sciences Education , 11 (4), 339–346. Link ,  Google Scholar
• Campoy, R. ( 2010 ). Reflective thinking and educational solutions: Clarifying what teacher educators are attempting to accomplish . SRATE Journal , 19 (2), 15–22. Google Scholar
• Chrousos, G. P., & Mentis, A.-F. A. ( 2020 ). Imposter syndrome threatens diversity . Science , 367 (6479), 749–750. Medline ,  Google Scholar
• Clarke, L. ( 2009 ). Video reflections in initial teacher education . British Journal of Educational Technology , 40 (5), 959–961. Google Scholar
• Cole, A. L. ( 1997 ). Impediments to reflective practice: Toward a new agenda for research on teaching . Teachers and Teaching , 3 (1), 7–27. Google Scholar
• Collins, K. H., Price, E. F., Hanson, L., & Neaves, D. ( 2020 ). Consequences of stereotype threat and imposter syndrome: The personal journey from Stem-practitioner to Stem-educator for four women of color . Taboo: The Journal of Culture and Education , 19 (4), 10. Google Scholar
• Davis, M. ( 2003 ). Barriers to reflective practice: The changing nature of higher education . Active Learning in Higher Education , 4 (3), 243–255. Google Scholar
• Day, C. ( 1993 ). Reflection: A necessary but not sufficient condition for professional development . British Educational Research Journal , 19 (1), 83–93. Google Scholar
• Dervent, F. ( 2015 ). The effect of reflective thinking on the teaching practices of preservice physical education teachers . Issues in Educational Research , 25 (3), 260–275. Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. ( 1933 ). How we think . Chelmsford, MA: Courier Corporation. Google Scholar
• Dyment, J. E., & O'Connell, T. S. ( 2014 ). When the ink runs dry: Implications for theory and practice when educators stop keeping reflective journals . Innovative Higher Education , 39 (5), 417–429. Google Scholar
• Eisenkraft, A. ( 2003 ). Expanding the 5 E model: A purposed 7 E model emphasizes “transfer of learning” and the importance of eliciting prior understanding . Science Teacher , 70 (6), 56–59. Google Scholar
• Farrell, T. S. ( 2008 ). Critical incidents in ELT initial teacher training . ELT Journal , 62 (1), 3–10. Google Scholar
• Farrell, T. S. ( 2012 ). Reflecting on reflective practice: (Re) visiting Dewey and Schon . TESOL Journal , 3 (1), 7–16. Google Scholar
• Galea, S. ( 2012 ). Reflecting reflective practice . Educational Philosophy and Theory , 44 (3), 245–258. Google Scholar
• Garza, R., & Smith, S. F. ( 2015 ). Pre-service teachers’ blog reflections: Illuminating their growth and development . Cogent Education , 2 (1), 1066550. Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, J., Southerland, S. A., Johnston, A., & Woodbury, S. ( 2003 ). Educational reform, personal practical theories, and dissatisfaction: The anatomy of change in college science teaching . American Educational Research Journal , 40 (3), 731–767. Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. ( 1988 ). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods . London, England: Further Education Unit. Google Scholar
• Greiman, B., & Covington, H. ( 2007 ). Reflective thinking and journal writing: Examining student teachers; perceptions of preferred reflective modality, journal writing outcomes, and journal structure . Career and Technical Education Research , 32 (2), 115–139. Google Scholar
• Griffin, M. L. ( 2003 ). Using critical incidents to promote and assess reflective thinking in preservice teachers . Reflective Practice , 4 (2), 207–220. Google Scholar
• Griffiths, M., & Tann, S. ( 1992 ). Using reflective practice to link personal and public theories . Journal of Education for Teaching , 18 (1), 69–84. Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. K., & Lee, R. ( 2011 ). Exploring the use of critical incident analysis and the professional learning conversation in an initial teacher education programme . Journal of Education for Teaching , 37 (2), 199–217. Google Scholar
• Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. ( 2011 ). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 48 (8), 952–984. Google Scholar
• Hubball, H., Collins, J., & Pratt, D. ( 2005 ). Enhancing reflective teaching practices: Implications for faculty development programs . Canadian Journal of Higher Education , 35 (3), 57–81. Google Scholar
• Husebø, S. E., O'Regan, S., & Nestel, D. ( 2015 ). Reflective practice and its role in simulation . Clinical Simulation in Nursing , 11 (8), 368–375. Google Scholar
• Jindal-Snape, D., & Holmes, E. A. ( 2009 ). A longitudinal study exploring perspectives of participants regarding reflective practice during their transition from higher education to professional practice . Reflective Practice , 10 (2), 219–232. Google Scholar
• Johnson, E., Keller, R., & Fukawa-Connelly, T. ( 2018 ). Results from a survey of abstract algebra instructors across the United States: Understanding the choice to (not) lecture . International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education , 4 , 254–285. Google Scholar
• Larrivee, B. ( 2000 ). Transforming teaching practice: Becoming the critically reflective teacher . Reflective Practice , 1 (3), 293–306. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1080/14623940020025561 Google Scholar
• Larrivee, B. ( 2005 ). Authentic classroom management: Creating a learning community and building reflective practice . Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Google Scholar
• Larrivee, B. ( 2008a ). Development of a tool to assess teachers’ level of reflective practice . Reflective Practice , 9 (3), 341–360.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940802207451 Google Scholar
• Larrivee, B. ( 2008b ). Meeting the challenge of preparing reflective practitioners . New Educator , 4 (2), 87–106. Google Scholar
• Lee, H.-J. ( 2005 ). Understanding and assessing preservice teachers’ reflective thinking . Teaching and Teacher Education , 21 (6), 699–715. Google Scholar
• Loughran, J. J. ( 2002a ). Developing reflective practice: Learning about teaching and learning through modelling . London, UK: Routledge. Google Scholar
• Loughran, J. J. ( 2002b ). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching . Journal of Teacher Education , 53 (1), 33–43. Google Scholar
• Manouchehri, A. ( 2001 ). Collegial interaction and reflective practice . Action in Teacher Education , 22 (4), 86–97. Google Scholar
• Markkanen, P., Välimäki, M., Anttila, M., & Kuuskorpi, M. ( 2020 ). A reflective cycle: Understanding challenging situations in a school setting . Educational Research , 62 (1), 46–62. Google Scholar
• McShannon, J., & Hynes, P. ( 2005 ). Student achievement and retention: Can professional development programs help faculty GRASP it? Journal of Faculty Development , 20 (2), 87–93. Google Scholar
• Michael, J. ( 2007 ). Faculty perceptions about barriers to active learning . College Teaching , 55 (2), 42–47. Google Scholar
• Michaelsen, L. K., Fink, L. D., & Black, R. H. ( 1996 ). What every faculty developer needs to know about learning groups . To Improve the Academy , 15 (1), 31–57. Google Scholar
• Munby, H., & Russell, T. ( 1989 ). Educating the reflective teacher: An essay review of two books by Donald Schon . Journal of Curriculum Studies , 21 (1), 71–80. Google Scholar
• Newman, S. ( 1999 ). Constructing and critiquing reflective practice . Educational Action Research , 7 (1), 145–163. Google Scholar
• Ostorga, A. N. ( 2006 ). Developing teachers who are reflective practitioners: A complex process . Issues in Teacher Education , 15 (2), 5–20. Google Scholar
• Parkman, A. ( 2016 ). The imposter phenomenon in higher education: Incidence and impact . Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice , 16 (1), 51. Google Scholar
• Penny, A. R., & Coe, R. ( 2004 ). Effectiveness of consultation on student ratings feedback: A meta-analysis . Review of Educational Research , 74 (2), 215–253. Google Scholar
• Posthuma, B. ( 2012 ). Mathematics teachers’ reflective practice within the context of adapted lesson study . Pythagoras , 33 (3), 1–9. Google Scholar
• Pultorak, E. G. ( 1996 ). Following the developmental process of reflection in novice teachers: Three years of investigation . Journal of Teacher Education , 47 (4), 283–291. Google Scholar
• Rodgers, C., & Laboskey, V. K. ( 2016 ). Reflective practice . International Handbook of Teacher Education , 2 , 71–104. Google Scholar
• Romano, M., & Schwartz, J. ( 2005 ). Exploring technology as a tool for eliciting and encouraging beginning teacher reflection . Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education , 5 (2), 149–168. Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. ( 1983 ). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action . New York, NY: Basic Books. Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky, P. ( 2015 ). The role of reflection in developing eupraxis in learning to teach English . Pedagogies: An International Journal , 10 (4), 285–308. Google Scholar
• Sturtevant, H., & Wheeler, L. ( 2019 ). The STEM Faculty Instructional Barriers and Identity Survey (FIBIS): Development and exploratory results . International Journal of STEM Education , 6 (1), 1–22. Google Scholar
• Tan, C. ( 2008 ). Improving schools through reflection for teachers: Lessons from Singapore . School Effectiveness and School Improvement , 19 (2), 225–238. Google Scholar
• Thompson, N., & Pascal, J. ( 2012 ). Developing critically reflective practice . Reflective Practice , 13 (2), 311–325.  https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2012.657795 Google Scholar
• Tripp, D. ( 2011 ). Critical incidents in teaching (classic edition): Developing professional judgement . London, England: Routledge. Google Scholar
• Valli, L. ( 1997 ). Listening to other voices: A description of teacher reflection in the United States . Peabody Journal of Education , 72 (1), 67–88. Google Scholar
• van Wyk, M. M. ( 2013 ). Using blogs as a means of enhancing reflective teaching practice in open distance learning ecologies . Africa Education Review , 10 (Suppl 1), S47–S62. Google Scholar
• Yik, B. J., Raker, J. R., Apkarian, N., Stains, M., Henderson, C., Dancy, M. H., & Johnson, E. ( 2022a ). Association of malleable factors with adoption of research-based instructional strategies in introductory chemistry, mathematics, and physics . Frontiers in Education , 7 , 1016415. Google Scholar
• Yik, B. J., Raker, J. R., Apkarian, N., Stains, M., Henderson, C., Dancy, M. H., & Johnson, E. ( 2022b ). Evaluating the impact of malleable factors on percent time lecturing in gateway chemistry, mathematics, and physics courses . International Journal of STEM Education , 9 (1), 1–23. Google Scholar
• Zahid, M., & Khanam, A. ( 2019 ). Effect of Reflective Teaching Practices on the Performance of Prospective Teachers . Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology—TOJET , 18 (1), 32–43. Google Scholar
• A word to the wise (gair i gall): university teacher educators’ experiences of emergency response pedagogy in Wales 8 November 2024 | Cogent Education, Vol. 11, No. 1
• Reflective Practice in Higher Education Institutions: Exploring Teachers’ Reflective Experiences and Challenges in Ethiopian Public Universities 23 May 2024 | Interchange, Vol. 55, No. 4
• Reflective practice as a tool for teacher education: a comparison between individual and peer reflection of Iranian EFL teachers 11 November 2024 | Discover Education, Vol. 3, No. 1
• From implementation to reflection: exploring faculty experiences in a curriculum-focused FOLC through multi-case analysis 5 February 2024 | Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, Vol. 6, No. 1
• Characterization of physics and astronomy assistant professors’ reflections on their teaching: can they promote engagement in instructional change? 17 April 2024 | Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, Vol. 6, No. 1
• Exploring factors influencing secondary school teachers’ engagement in reflective teaching 10 October 2024 | Reflective Practice, Vol. 38
• Reimagining faculty development: A paradigm shift from content to transformative learning processes 18 August 2024 | Medical Teacher
• Explicit teaching of reflective practice (RP) in pre-service teacher education: probing the immediate and long-term influence 30 July 2024 | Teachers and Teaching
• Extending higher education recognition programs through a dedicated post-award reflective practice tool 30 June 2024 | Reflective Practice, Vol. 25, No. 4
• Improving scrub and circulating skills in operating room students: A quasi-experimental study on the influence of reflective education 1 July 2024 | Journal of Medical Education Development, Vol. 17, No. 54
• Educating custom officers supervisors: how do they experience their role? 7 June 2024 | Journal of Workplace Learning, Vol. 36, No. 5
• An Action Research on the Development of the Reflective Thinking Skills of Preservice Preschool Teachers* 15 June 2024 | Systemic Practice and Action Research, Vol. 35
• An Educational Framework for Teaching Chemistry Using a Systems Thinking Approach 17 April 2024 | Journal of Chemical Education, Vol. 101, No. 5
• Signature pedagogies and professionalism: An exploratory study on novice principal mentoring 16 April 2024 | Educational Management Administration & Leadership, Vol. 37
• Levels of Reflection in Teachers and Family Medicine Residents: A Qualitative Study 20 March 2024 | Atención Familiar, Vol. 25, No. 2
• Niveles de reflexión en profesores y residentes de medicina familiar: estudio cualitativo 20 March 2024 | Atención Familiar, Vol. 25, No. 2
• The Perceptions and Experiences of In-Service Teachers in a Computer Science Professional Development Program 9 February 2024 | Sustainability, Vol. 16, No. 4
• Reciprocal Learning From and For Teacher Education: Reflections and Looking into the Future 22 October 2024
• Preservice teachers' reflections on lesson study integration into a microteaching course 1 Jan 2024 | Social Sciences & Humanities Open, Vol. 10
• “Walking the Talk” in Special Educator Preparation for Neurodiversity 18 Dec 2023
• Toward asset-based LatCrit pedagogies in STEM: centering Latine students’ strengths to reimagine STEM teaching and practice 29 June 2023 | Frontiers in Education, Vol. 8

Submitted: 28 July 2022 Revised: 8 February 2023 Accepted: 22 February 2023

© 2023 H. Machost and M. Stains. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2023 The American Society for Cell Biology. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 Unported Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0).

CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS article

Conceptualizing the complexity of reflective practice in education.

• 1 Centre for Enhancement of Learning and Teaching, University of West London, London, United Kingdom
• 2 Faculty of Languages and Communication, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Terengganu, Malaysia
• 3 Department of English Language, Literature and Translation, Zarqa University, Zarqa, Jordan

In higher education, reflective practice has become a dynamic, participatory, and cyclical process that contributes to educators’ professional development and personal growth. While it is now a prominent part of educators, many still find it challenging to apply the concept for it carries diverse meaning for different people in different contexts. This article attempts to (re)conceptualize the complexity of reflective practice in an educational context. Scholars in this field have taken different approaches to reflective practice, but all these approaches consist of four main components in common: (i) reflecting; (ii) planning for future action; (iii) acting; and (iv) evaluating the outcomes. We extend the existing literature by proposing a model which integrates these four components with three key aspects of reflection: problem-solving, action orientation, and criticality. The novelty of this model lies within its alignment of the three key aspects with different levels of criticality in a comprehensive framework with detailed descriptors provided. The model and its descriptors are useful in guiding individuals who directly or indirectly involve in critical reflection, especially educators, in appraising their levels of criticality and consequently engage in a meaningful reflection.

Introduction

In the field of education, reflective practice has been recognized as an important aspect in continuing professional development. Through reflective practice, we can identify the factors, the consequences of and the assumptions that underlie our actions. In higher education, reflective practice has become a dynamic, participatory, and cyclical process ( Ai et al., 2017 ) that contributes to educators’ professional development and personal growth ( McAlpine et al., 2004 ; De Geest et al., 2011 ; Davies, 2012 ; Marshall, 2019 ). It enables professional judgment ( Day, 1999 ) and fosters professional competence through planning, implementing and improving performance by rethinking about strengths, weaknesses and specific learning needs ( Huda and Teh, 2018 ; Cirocki and Widodo, 2019 ; Zahid and Khanam, 2019 ; Seyed Abolghasem et al., 2020 ; Huynh, 2022 ). Without routinely engaging in reflective practice, it is unlikely that educators will comprehend the effects of their motivations, expectations and experiences upon their practice ( Lubbe and Botha, 2020 ). Thus, reflective practice becomes an important tool that helps educators to explore and articulate lived experiences, current experience, and newly created knowledge ( Osterman and Kottkamp, 2004 ). Educators are continually recommended to apply reflective practice in getting a better understanding of what they know and do as they develop their knowledge of practice ( Loughran, 2002 ; Lubbe and Botha, 2020 ). In fact, reflective practice is now a prominent part of training for trainee teachers (e.g., Shek et al., 2021 ; Childs and Hillier, 2022 ; Ruffinelli et al., 2022 ) because it can help future teachers review their own practices and develop relevant skills where necessary.

Despite the wide acceptance of the concept of reflective practice, the notion of ‘reflection’ in itself is still broad. Our review of literature reveals that reflection is a term that carries diverse meaning. For some, “it simply means thinking about something” or “just thinking” (e.g., Loughran, 2002 , p. 33), whereas for others, it is a well-defined practice with very specific purpose, meaning and action (e.g., Dewey, 1933 ; Schön, 1983 ; Grimmett and Erickson, 1988 ; Richardson, 1990 ; Loughran, 2002 ; Spalding et al., 2002 ; Paterson and Chapman, 2013 ). We found many interesting interpretations made along this continuum, but we believe the most appealing that rings true for most people is that reflection is useful and informing in the development and understanding of teaching and learning (e.g., Seitova, 2019 ; McGarr, 2021 ; Huynh, 2022 ). This, however, is not enough to signify the characteristics of reflection. Consequently, many teachers find it hard to understand the concept and engage in reflective practice for their professional development ( Bennett-Levy and Lee, 2014 ; Burt and Morgan, 2014 ; Haarhoff et al., 2015 ; Marshall, 2019 ; Huynh, 2022 ; Knassmüller, 2022 ; Kovacs and Corrie, 2022 ). For example, some teachers from higher arts education have considered reflective practice as antithetical to practical learning ( Guillaumier, 2016 ; Georgii-Hemming et al., 2020 ) as they often frame explicit reflection as assessed reflective writing, which is “disconnected from the embodied and non-verbal dimensions of making and reflecting on art” ( Treacy & Gaunt, 2021 , p. 488). The lack of understanding of the concept has created disengagement in reflection and reflective practice ( Aliakbari and Adibpour, 2018 ; Huynh, 2022 ; Knassmüller, 2022 ) which resulted in poor insight and performance in practice ( Davies, 2012 ). To overcome this, educators should foster their understanding of the reflective practice, so they not only can reap its benefits for their own learning, but also facilitate and maximize reflective skills within their students.

In this paper, we aim to provide an overview of the concepts of effective reflective practice and present the value of reflective practice that can help teachers to professionally develop. First, we situate our conceptual understanding of reflective practice by discussing key issues surrounding reflection and reflective practice. Second, we present the key aspects of effective reflective practice. Finally, based on our discussion of key aspects of effective reflective practice, we introduce a revised model of reflective practice that may serve as a guide for educators to professionally develop. Although the model is but one approach, we believe it holds promise for others grappling as we are with efforts to encourage reflective practices among educators who find reflection in and on their practices a complex concept.

Key issues in reflective practice

The concepts of “reflection,” “reflective thought,” and “reflective thinking” have been discussed since 1904, when John Dewey claimed that an individual with good ethical values would treat professional actions as experimental and reflect upon their actions and consequences. Dewey defined reflection as the “active, persistent, and careful consideration of any belief or supposed form of knowledge in the light of the grounds that support it and the further conclusions to which it tends” ( Dewey, 1904 , p. 10). His basic notion is that reflection is an active, deliberative cognitive process involving a sequence of interconnected ideas that include the underlying beliefs and knowledge of an individual.

Following Dewey’s original work and its subsequent interpretation, four key thought-provoking issues are worthy of discussion: reflective thinking versus reflective action; time of reflection; reflection and problem solving; and critical reflection. The first concern is whether reflection is a process limited to thinking about action or also bound up in action ( Grant and Zeichner, 1984 ; Noffke and Brennan, 1988 ; Hatton and Smith, 1995 ). There seems to be broad agreement that reflection is a form of thought process ( Ross, 1989 ; McNamara, 1990 ; Sparks-Langer et al., 1991 ; Hatton and Smith, 1995 ) even though some do not lead to action. However, Dewey’s first mention of “reflective action” suggests he was concerned with the implementation of solutions after thinking through problems. Therefore, reflective practice, in our view, is bound up with the constant, careful consideration of practice in the light of knowledge and beliefs. The complete cycle of reflection should then lead to clear, modified action and this needs to be distinguished from routine action derived from impulse, tradition, or authority ( Noffke and Brennan, 1988 ; Gore and Zeichner, 1991 ; Hatton and Smith, 1995 ).

The time frames within which reflection takes place, needs to be addressed—relatively immediate and short term, or rather more extended and systematic. Schön (1983) holds that professionals should learn to frame and reframe the problems they often face and after trying out various interpretations, modify their actions as a result. He proposes “reflection-in-action,” which requires conscious thinking and modification, simultaneously reflecting and doing almost immediately. Similar to this concept is “technical reflection,” involving thinking about competencies or skills and their effectiveness and occurs almost immediately after an implementation and can then lead to changes in subsequent action ( Cruickshank, 1985 ; Killen, 1989 ). While the notion of immediacy in reflective practice seems appropriate, some argue that the process should involve conscious detachment from an activity after a distinct period of contemplation ( Boud et al., 1985 ; Buchmann, 1990 ). This is because reflection demands contemplating rational and moral practices in order to make reasoned judgments about better ways to act. Reflective practice often involves looking back at actions from a distance, after they have taken place ( Schön, 1983 ; Gore and Zeichner, 1991 ; Smith and Lovat, 1991 ). While immediate and extended “versions” of reflections are both recognized, we suppose no one is better than another. However, we believe that being able to think consciously about what is happening and respond instantaneously makes for a higher level of reflective competence.

The third issue identified from our literature review is whether reflection by its very nature is problem orientated ( Calderhead, 1989 ; Adler, 1991 ). Reflection is widely agreed to be a thought process concerned with finding solutions to real problems ( Calderhead, 1989 ; Adler, 1991 ; Hatton and Smith, 1995 ; Loughran, 2002 ; Choy and Oo, 2012 ). However, it is unclear whether solving problems is an inherent characteristic of reflection. For example, Schön’s (1983) reflection-in-action involves thought processing simultaneously with a group event taking place, and reflection-on-action refers to a debriefing process after an event. Both aims to develop insights into what took place—the aims, the difficulties during the event or experience and better ways to act. While focusing on reacting to practical events, these practices do not often intend to find solutions to specific practical problems. Instead, reflective practitioners are invited to think about a new set of actions from if not wider, at least different perspectives.

The fourth issue in the literature revolves around “critical reflection.” Very often critical reflection is concerned with how individuals consciously consider their actions from within wider historical, cultural and political beliefs when framing practical problems for which to seek solutions ( Gore and Zeichner, 1991 ; Hatton and Smith, 1995 ; Choy and Oo, 2012 ). It is a measure of a person’s acceptance of a particular ideology, its assumptions and epistemology, when critical reflection is developed within reflective practice ( McNamara, 1990 ; Hatton and Smith, 1995 ). It implies the individual locates any analysis of personal action within her/his wider socio-historical and political-cultural contexts ( Noffke and Brennan, 1988 ; Smith and Lovat, 1991 ; Hatton and Smith, 1995 ). While this makes sense, critical reflection in the literature appears to loosely refer to an individual’s constructive self-criticism of their actions to improve in future ( Calderhead, 1989 ), not a consideration of personal actions with both moral and ethical criteria ( Senge, 1990 ; Adler, 1991 ; Gore and Zeichner, 1991 ). Thus, we see a need to define critical reflection in line with the key characteristics of reflective practice.

Effective reflective practice

Reflecting on the issues discussed above, we conclude that for reflective practice to be effective, it requires three key aspects: problem-solving, critical reflection and action-orientation. However, these aspects of reflective practice have different levels of complexity and meaning.

Problem-solving

A problem is unlikely to be acted upon if it is not viewed as a problem. Thus, it is crucial to problematize things during reflection, to see concerns that require improvement. This is not a simple process as people’s ability to perceive things as problems is related to their previous experiences. For example, a senior teacher with years of teaching experience and a rapport with the students s/he teaches will be immediately aware of students experiencing difficulties with current teaching strategies. However, a junior teacher whose experience is restricted to a three-month placement and who has met students only a few times will be less aware. The differences in experience also influence the way people interpret problems. For example, the senior teacher may believe his/her teaching strategy is at fault if half the students cannot complete the given tasks. A junior teacher with only 2 weeks teaching experience may deduce that the students were not interested in the topic, and that is why they cannot complete the tasks given. This example illustrates the range of ways a problem can be perceived and the advantages of developing the ability to frame and reframe a problem ( Schön, 1983 ). Problems can also be perceived differently depending on one’s moral and cultural beliefs, and social, ethical and/or political values ( Aliakbari and Adibpour, 2018 ; Karnieli-Miller, 2020 ). This could be extended to other factors such as institutional, educational and political system ( Aliakbari and Adibpour, 2018 ).

Framing and reframing a problem through reflection can influence the practice of subsequent actions ( Loughran, 2002 ; Arms Almengor, 2018 ; Treacy and Gaunt, 2021 ). In the example above, the junior teacher attributes the problem to the students’ attitude, which gives her/him little to no incentive to address the situation. This is an ineffective reflective practice because it has little impact on the problem. Thus, we believe it is crucial for individuals to not only recognize problems but to examine their practices ( Loughran, 2002 ; Arms Almengor, 2018 ; Zahid and Khanam, 2019 ) through a different lens to their existing perspectives so solutions can be developed and acted upon. This requires critical reflection.

Critical reflection

We believe it is the critical aspect of reflection that makes reflective practice effective and more complex, formulated by various scholars as different stages of reflection. Zeichner and Liston (1987) proposed three stages of reflection similar to those described by Van Manen (1977) . They suggested the first stage was “technical reflection” on how far the means to achieve certain end goals were effective, without criticism or modification. In the second stage, “practical reflection,” both the means and the ends are examined, with the assumptions compared to the actual outcomes. This level of reflection recognizes that meanings are embedded in and negotiated through language, hence are not absolute. The final stage, “critical reflection,” combined with the previous two, considers both the moral and ethical criteria of the judgments about professional activity ( Senge, 1990 ; Adler, 1991 ; Gore and Zeichner, 1991 ).

While the three stages above capture the complexity of reflection, individuals will only reach an effective level of reflection when they are able to be self-critical in their judgments and reasoning and can expand their thinking based on new evidence. This aligns with Ross’ (1989) five stages of reflection (see Table 1 ). In her five stages of reflection, individuals do not arrive at the level of critical reflection until they get to stages 4 and 5, which require them to contextualize their knowledge and integrate the new evidence before making any judgments or modification ( Van Gyn, 1996 ).

Table 1 . Five stages of reflections ( Ross, 1989 ).

Action-orientation

We believe it is important that any reflections should be acted upon. Looking at the types and stages of reflection discussed earlier, there is a clear indication that reflective practice is a cyclical process ( Kolb, 1984 ; Richards and Lockhart, 2005 ; Taggart and Wilson, 2005 ; Clarke, 2008 ; Pollard et al., 2014 ; Babaei and Abednia, 2016 ; Ratminingsih et al., 2018 ; Oo and Habók, 2020 ). Richards and Lockhart (2005) suggest this cyclical process comprises planning, acting, observing, and reflecting. This is further developed by Hulsman et al. (2009) who believe that the cyclical process not only involves action and observation, but also analysis, presentation and feedback. In the education field, reflective practice is also considered cyclical ( Clarke, 2008 ; Pollard et al., 2014 ; Kennedy-Clark et al., 2018 ) because educators plan, observe, evaluate, and revise their teaching practice continuously ( Pollard et al., 2014 ). This process can be done through a constant systematic self-evaluation cycle ( Ratminingsih et al., 2018 ) which involves a written analysis or an open discussion with colleagues.

From the descriptions above, it seems that cyclical reflective practice entails identifying a problem, exploring its root cause, modifying action plans based on reasoning and evidence, executing and evaluating the new action and its results. Within this cyclical process, we consider action as a deliberate change is the key to effective reflective practice, especially in the field of education. Reflection that is action-oriented is an ongoing process which refers to how educators prepare and teach and the methods they employ. Educators move from one teaching stage to the next while gaining the knowledge through experience of the importance/relevance of the chosen methods in the classroom situation ( Oo and Habók, 2020 ).

While reflection is an invisible cognitive process, it is not altogether intuitive ( Plessner et al., 2011 ). Individuals, especially those lacking experience, may lack adequate intuition ( Greenhalgh, 2002 ). To achieve a certain level of reflection, they need guidance and this can be done with others either in groups ( Gibbs, 1988 ; Grant et al., 2017 ) or through one-on-one feedback ( Karnieli-Miller, 2020 ). The others, who can be peers or mentors, can help provide different perspectives in exploring alternative interpretations and behaviors. Having said this, reflecting with others may not always feasible as it often requires investment of time and energy from others ( Karnieli-Miller, 2020 ). Therefore, teachers must learn how to scaffold their own underlying values, attitudes, thoughts, and emotions, and critically challenge and evaluate assumptions of everyday practice on their own. With this in mind, we have created a cyclical process of reflective practice which may help in individual reflections. It captures the three key aspects of reflective practice discussed above. This model may help teachers having a range of experience enhance their competence through different focus and levels of reflection (see Figure 1 ).

Figure 1 . Cyclical reflective practice model capturing problem-solving, action-oriented critical reflection.

The model illustrates the cyclical process with three stages: reflection, modification and action. At the reflection stage, a problem and the root of the problem is explored so it can be framed as it is/was and then reframed to identify a possible solution. This is followed by a modification for change based on the reasoning and evidence explored during the reflection stage. Finally, the action stage involves executing action (an event), followed by the reflection stage to begin another cycle and continue the process.

As presented earlier, it is crucial for individuals to be able to frame and reframe problems through a different lens to their existing perspectives so solutions can be developed and acted upon. Thus, the model above expands Tsangaridou and O’Sullivan’s (1994) framework by adding together the element of problematizing. The current revised framework highlights the four focuses of reflection; technical addresses the management or procedural aspects of teaching practice; situational addresses the context of teaching; sensitizing involves reflecting upon the social, moral, ethical or political concerns of teaching; and problematizing concerns the framing and reframing of the problem identified within the teaching context. Considering the different levels of critical reflection, we extend the four focuses of reflection to three different levels of critical reflection: descriptive involves reflection of the four focuses without reasoning or criticism; descriptive with rationale involves reflection of the four focuses with reasoning; and descriptive with rationale and evaluation involves reflection of the four focuses with both reasoning and criticism (see Table 2 ). Each of these levels requires different degrees of critical analysis and competence to extract information from actions and experiences. Overall, level three best captures effective critical reflection for each focus.

Table 2 . A framework of reflection.

This revised model that we proposed encompasses different levels of critical reflection and is action-oriented. There is also a clear link to problem-solving which requires framing and reframing problems to accurately identify them, which may influence the value and effectiveness of the actions that follow ( Loughran, 2002 ). Thus, this model may help people, especially those with lack experience to recognize the different aspects of reflection so they can make better assessments of and modifications to their procedures ( Ross, 1989 ; Van Gyn, 1996 ).

The meaning of reflection and reflective practice is not clear cut. However, we believe a reflective educator should cultivate a set of responses to how their teaching operates in practice. As Dewey (1933) suggested, educators must find time to reflect on their activity, knowledge, and experience so that they can develop and more effectively serve their community, nurturing each student’s learning. However, this does not always happen. Some educators do not reflect on their own practice because they find the concept of reflective practice difficult to put into practice for their professional development ( Jay and Johnson, 2002 ; Bennett-Levy and Lee, 2014 ; Burt and Morgan, 2014 ; Haarhoff et al., 2015 ; Marshall, 2019 ; Huynh, 2022 ).

Our review of the literature indicates that reflective practice is a complex process and some scholars argue that it should involve active thinking that is more bound up with action ( Grant and Zeichner, 1984 ; Noffke and Brennan, 1988 ; Hatton and Smith, 1995 ). Thus, the complete cycle of reflective practice needs to be distinguished from routine action which may stem from impulse, tradition, or authority ( Noffke and Brennan, 1988 ; Gore and Zeichner, 1991 ; Hatton and Smith, 1995 ). In addition, some also argue that reflective practice involves the conscious detachment from an activity followed by deliberation ( Boud et al., 1985 ; Buchmann, 1990 ), and therefore reflective practice should not occur immediately after action. Although this is acceptable, we believe that instant reflection and modification for future action can be a good indicator of an individual’s level of reflective competence.

Reflective practice is an active process that requires individuals to make the tacit explicit. Thus, it is crucial to acknowledge that reflection is, by its very nature, problem-centered ( Calderhead, 1989 ; Adler, 1991 ; Hatton and Smith, 1995 ; Loughran, 2002 ; Choy and Oo, 2012 ). Only with this in mind can individuals frame and reframe their actions or experiences to discover specific solutions. Reflective practice is also complex, requiring critical appraisal and consideration of various aspects of thought processes. Individuals must play close attention to what they do, evaluate what works and what does not work on a personal, practical and professional level ( Gore and Zeichner, 1991 ; Hatton and Smith, 1995 ; Choy and Oo, 2012 ). However, some would consider critical reflection as no more than constructive self-criticism of one’s actions with a view to improve ( Calderhead, 1989 ). Consequently, scholars have taken different approaches to reflective practice in teaching areas that include critical thinking (e.g., Ross, 1989 ; Tsangaridou and O’Sullivan, 1994 ; Loughran, 2002 ). These approaches had four components in common: reflecting (observing actions, reviewing, recollecting), planning for future action (thinking and considering), acting (practice, experience, and learning), and evaluating (interpreting and assessing outcomes). We propose a model that embraces these four sub-areas and three key aspects of reflection: problem-solving, action orientation and critical reflection. We align these key aspects with level of criticality in a framework with detailed descriptors. It is hoped that these elements, combined together, demonstrate the complexities of reflection in a better, clearer way so that those struggling to adopt reflective practice will now be able to do so without much difficulty.

Author contributions

MM contributed to conception and written the first draft of the manuscript. RR contributed in the discussion of the topic. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Adler, S. (1991). The reflective practitioner and the curriculum of teacher education. J. Educ. Teach. 17, 139–150. doi: 10.1080/0260747910170203

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ai, A., Al-Shamrani, S., and Almufti, A. (2017). Secondary school science teachers’ views about their reflective practices. J. Teach. Educ. Sustainability 19, 43–53. doi: 10.1515/jtes-2017-0003

Aliakbari, M., and Adibpour, M. (2018). Reflective EFL education in Iran: existing situation and teachers’ perceived fundamental challenges. Eurasian J. Educ. Res. 18, 1–16. doi: 10.14689/ejer.2018.77.7

Arms Almengor, R. (2018). Reflective practice and mediator learning: a current review. Conflict Resolut. Q. 36, 21–38. doi: 10.1002/crq.21219

Babaei, M., and Abednia, A. (2016). Reflective teaching and self-efficacy beliefs: exploring relationships in the context of teaching EFL in Iran. Austral. J. Teach. Educ. 41, 1–27. doi: 10.14221/ajte.2016v41n9.1

Bennett-Levy, J., and Lee, N. K. (2014). Self-practice and self-reflection in cognitive behaviour therapy training: what factors influence trainees’ engagement and experience of benefit? Behav. Cogn. Psychother. 42, 48–64. doi: 10.1017/S1352465812000781

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Boud, D., Keogh, M., and Walker, D. (1985). Reflection. Turning experience into learning . London: Kogan Page.

Google Scholar

Buchmann, M. (1990). Beyond the lonely, choosing will: professional development in teacher thinking. Teach. Coll. Rec. 91:508.

Burt, E., and Morgan, P. (2014). Barriers to systematic reflective practice as perceived by UKCC level 1 and level 2 qualified Rugby union coaches. Reflective Pract. 15, 468–480. doi: 10.1080/14623943.2014.900016

Calderhead, J. (1989). Reflective teaching and teacher education. Teach. Teach. Educ. 5, 43–51. doi: 10.1016/0742-051X(89)90018-8

Childs, A., and Hillier, J. (2022). “Developing the practice of teacher educators: the role of practical theorising,” in Practical Theorising in teacher education: Holding theory and practice together . eds. K. Burn, T. Mutton, and I. Thompson (London: Taylor & Francis).

Choy, S. C., and Oo, P. S. (2012). Reflective thinking and teaching practices: a precursor for incorporating critical thinking into the classroom? Online Submission 5, 167–182.

Cirocki, A., and Widodo, H. P. (2019). Reflective practice in English language teaching in Indonesia: shared practices from two teacher educators. Iran. J. Lang. Teach. Res. 7, 15–35. doi: 10.30466/ijltr.2019.120734

Clarke, P. A. (2008). Reflective teaching model: a tool for motivation, collaboration, self-reflection, and innovation in learning. Georgia Educ. Res. J. 5, 1–18.

Cruickshank, D. (1985). Uses and benefits of reflective teaching Phi Delta Kappan, 704–706. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20387492

Davies, S. (2012). Embracing reflective practice. Educ. Prim. Care 23, 9–12. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2012.11494064

Day, C. (1999). “Researching teaching through reflective practice,” in Researching teaching: Methodologies and practices for understanding pedagogy . ed. J. J. Loughran (London: Falmer)

De Geest, E., Joubert, M. V., Sutherland, R. J., Back, J., and Hirst, C. (2011). Researching effective continuing professional development in mathematics education. In International Approaches to Professional Development of Mathematics Teachers. (Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press), 223–231.

Dewey, J. (1904). “The relation of theory to practice in education,” in Third yearbook of the National Society for the scientific study of education . ed. C. S. McMurray (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), 9–30.

Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process . New York: D.C. Heath and Company.

Georgii-Hemming, E., Johansson, K., and Moberg, N. (2020). Reflection in higher music education: what, why, wherefore? Music. Educ. Res. 22, 245–256. doi: 10.1080/14613808.2020.1766006

Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods Further Education Unit. Oxford Polytechnic. Oxford.

Gore, J., and Zeichner, K. (1991). Action research and reflective teaching in preservice teacher education: a case study from the United States. Teach. Teach. Educ. 7:136

Grant, A., McKimm, J., and Murphy, F. (2017). Developing reflective practice: A guide for medical students, doctors and teachers . West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

Grant, C., and Zeichner, K. (1984). “On becoming a reflective teacher,” in Preparing for reflective teaching . ed. C. Grant (Boston: Allyn & Bacon).

Greenhalgh, T. (2002). Intuition and evidence--uneasy bedfellows? Br. J. Gen. Pract. 52, 395–400.

Grimmett, P. P., and Erickson, G. L. (1988). Reflection in teacher education . New York: Teachers College Press.

Guillaumier, C. (2016). Reflection as creative process: perspectives, challenges and practice. Arts Human. Higher Educ. 15, 353–363. doi: 10.1177/1474022216647381

Haarhoff, B., Thwaites, R., and Bennett-Levy, J. (2015). Engagement with self-practice/self-reflection as a professional development activity: the role of therapist beliefs. Aust. Psychol. 50, 322–328. doi: 10.1111/ap.12152

Hatton, N., and Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: towards definition and implementation. Teach. Teach. Educ. 11, 33–49. doi: 10.1016/0742-051X(94)00012-U

Huda, M., and Teh, K. S. M. (2018). “Empowering professional and ethical competence on reflective teaching practice in digital era,” in Mentorship strategies in teacher education . eds. K. Dikilitas, E. Mede, and D. Atay (IGI Global), 136–152.

Hulsman, R. L., Harmsen, A. B., and Fabriek, M. (2009). Reflective teaching of medical communication skills with DiViDU: Assessing the level of student reflection on recorded consultations with simulated patients. Patient education and counseling 74, 142–149. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.10.009

Huynh, H. T. (2022). Promoting professional development in language teaching through reflective practice. Vietnam J. Educ. 6, 62–68. doi: 10.52296/vje.2022.126

Jay, J. K., and Johnson, K. L. (2002). Capturing complexity: a typology of reflective practice for teacher education. Teach. Teach. Educ. 18, 73–85. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00051-8

Karnieli-Miller, O. (2020). Reflective practice in the teaching of communication skills. Patient Educ. Couns. 103, 2166–2172. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.06.021

Kennedy-Clark, S., Eddles-Hirsch, K., Francis, T., Cummins, G., Ferantino, L., Tichelaar, M., et al. (2018). Developing pre-service teacher professional capabilities through action research. Austral. J. Teach. Educ. 43, 39–58. doi: 10.14221/ajte.2018v43n9.3

Killen, L. (1989). Reflective teaching. J. Teach. Educ. 40, 49–52. doi: 10.1177/002248718904000209

Knassmüller, M. (2022). “The challenges of developing reflective practice in public administration: a teaching perspective,” in Handbook of teaching public administration . eds. K. Bottom, J. Diamond, P. Dunning, and I. Elliott (Edward Elgar Publishing), 178–187.

Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development . PrenticeHall: New Jersey.

Kovacs, L., and Corrie, S. (2022). Building reflective capability to enhance coaching practice. In Coaching Practiced . eds. D. Tee and J. Passmore (John Wiley & Sons Ltd), 85–96.

Loughran, J. J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: in search of meaning in learning about teaching. J. Teach. Educ. 53, 33–43. doi: 10.1177/0022487102053001004

Lubbe, W., and Botha, C. S. (2020). The dimensions of reflective practice: a teacher educator’s and nurse educator’s perspective. Reflective Pract. 21, 287–300. doi: 10.1080/14623943.2020.1738369

Marshall, T. (2019). The concept of reflection: a systematic review and thematic synthesis across professional contexts. Reflective Pract. 20, 396–415. doi: 10.1080/14623943.2019.1622520

McAlpine, L., Weston, C., Berthiaume, D., Fairbank-Roch, G., and Owen, W. (2004). Reflection on teaching: types and goals of reflection. Educ. Res. Eval. 10, 337–363. doi: 10.1080/13803610512331383489

McGarr, O. (2021). The use of virtual simulations in teacher education to develop pre-service teachers’ behaviour and classroom management skills: implications for reflective practice. J. Educ. Teach. 47, 274–286. doi: 10.1080/02607476.2020.1733398

McNamara, D. (1990). Research on teachers’ thinking: its contribution to educating student teachers to think critically. J. Educ. Teach. 16, 147–160. doi: 10.1080/0260747900160203

Noffke, S., and Brennan, M. (1988). The dimensions of reflection: A conceptual and contextual analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the America Educational Research Association, New Orleans.

Oo, T. Z., and Habók, A. (2020). The development of a reflective teaching model for Reading comprehension in English language teaching. Int. Electr. J. Element. Educ. 13, 127–138.

Osterman, K. F., and Kottkamp, R. B. (2004). Reflective practice for educators: Professional development to improve student learning . Thousand California: Corwin Press.

Paterson, C., and Chapman, J. (2013). Enhancing skills of critical reflection to evidence learning in professional practice. Phys. Ther. Sport 14, 133–138. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2013.03.004

Plessner, H., Betsch, C., and Betsch, T. (2011). The nature of intuition and its neglect in research on judgment and decision making. In Intuition in Judgment and Decision Making . (New York: Psychology Press), 23–42.

Pollard, A., Black-Hawkins, K., Hodges, G. C., Dudley, P., James, M., Linklater, H., et al. (2014). Reflective teaching in schools (4th edtn.). London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.

Ratminingsih, N. M., Artini, L. P., and Padmadewi, N. N. (2018). Incorporating self and peer assessment in reflective teaching practices. Int. J. Instr. 10, 165–184.

Richards, J. C., and Lockhart, C. (2005). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms . New York: Cambridge University Press.

Richardson, V. (1990). “The evolution of reflective teaching and teacher education,” in Encouraging reflective practice in education . ed. M. Pugach (New York: Teachers College Press), 3–19.

Ross, D. D. (1989). First steps in developing a reflective approach. J. Teach. Educ. 40, 22–30. doi: 10.1177/002248718904000205

Ruffinelli, A., Álvarez Valdés, C., and Salas Aguayo, M. (2022). Strategies to promote generative reflection in practicum tutorials in teacher training: the representations of tutors and practicum students. Reflective Pract. 23, 30–43. doi: 10.1080/14623943.2021.1974371

Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action . NewYork: Basic Books.

Seitova, M. (2019). Student Teachers’ perceptions of reflective practice. Int. Online J. Educ. Teach. 6, 765–772.

Senge, P. (1990). The 5th discipline . New York: Doubleday.

Seyed Abolghasem, F., Othman, J., and Ahmad Shah, S. S. (2020). Enhanced learning: the hidden art of reflective journal writing among Malaysian pre-registered student nurses. J. Nusantara Stud. 5, 54–79. doi: 10.24200/jonus.vol5iss1pp54-79

Shek, M. M. P., Leung, K. C., and To, P. Y. L. (2021). Using a video annotation tool to enhance student-teachers’ reflective practices and communication competence in consultation practices through a collaborative learning community. Educ. Inf. Technol. 26, 4329–4352. doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10480-9

Smith, D., and Lovat, T. (1991). Curriculum: Action on reflection (2nd edtn.). Wentworth Falls: Social Science Press.

Spalding, E., Wilson, A., and Mewborn, D. (2002). Demystifying reflection: a study of pedagogical strategies that encourage reflective journal writing. Teach. Coll. Rec. 104, 1393–1421. doi: 10.1111/1467-9620.00208

Sparks-Langer, G., Colton, A., Pasch, M., and Starko, A. (1991). Promoting cognitive, critical, and narrative reflection. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

Taggart, G. L., and Wilson, A. P. (eds.) (2005). “Becoming a reflective teacher,” in Promoting reflective thinking in teachers: 50 action strategies (Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press)

Treacy, D., and Gaunt, H. (2021). Promoting interconnections between reflective practice and collective creativity in higher arts education: the potential of engaging with a reflective matrix. Reflective Pract. 22, 488–500. doi: 10.1080/14623943.2021.1923471

Tsangaridou, N., and O’Sullivan, M. (1994). Using pedagogical reflective strategies to enhance reflection among preservice physical education teachers. J. Teach. Phys. Educ. 14, 13–33. doi: 10.1123/jtpe.14.1.13

Van Gyn, G. H. (1996). Reflective practice: the needs of professions and the promise of cooperative education. J. Cooperat. Educ. 31, 103–131.

Van Manen, M. (1977). Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical. Curric. Inq. 6, 205–228. doi: 10.1080/03626784.1977.11075533

Zahid, M., and Khanam, A. (2019). Effect of reflective teaching practices on the performance of prospective teachers. Turk. Online J. Educ. Technol. 18, 32–43.

Zeichner, K. M., and Liston, D. (1987). Teaching student teachers to reflect. Harv. Educ. Rev. 57, 23–49. doi: 10.17763/haer.57.1.j18v7162275t1w3w

Keywords: criticality, reflection, revised model, reflective practice, problematizing

Citation: Mohamed M, Rashid RA and Alqaryouti MH (2022) Conceptualizing the complexity of reflective practice in education. Front. Psychol . 13:1008234. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1008234

Received: 31 July 2022; Accepted: 28 September 2022; Published: 19 October 2022.

Reviewed by:

Copyright © 2022 Mohamed, Rashid and Alqaryouti. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Misrah Mohamed, [email protected]

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.