case study vs research papers

What is the Difference Between a Case Study and a Research Paper?

• by Sean Brown
• October 6, 2023

Writing a research paper or a case study may sound similar, but there are key differences between the two. Whether you’re a student or a professional in the research field, it’s important to understand these distinctions to effectively communicate your findings.

In this blog post, we’ll explore the variances between a case study and a research paper. We’ll delve into the sources of case studies, the intended audience, the sample sizes, and the structure of these two types of academic work. By the end, you’ll have a clearer understanding of when to choose a case study or a research paper, ensuring you present your findings in the most appropriate format.

The Distinctions between a Case Study and a Research Paper

When it comes to academic writing, two common types of papers often cause confusion: case studies and research papers. While they share some similarities, it’s essential to understand their key differences to produce the right piece suitable for your study. In this article, we’ll unravel the disparities between these two types of papers and shed some light on the subject. So, grab a cup of coffee and let’s dive in!

Case Studies: Unraveling Mysteries with Real-Life Examples

Definition and purpose.

Case studies are a fascinating breed of academic papers that focus on examining real-life situations or events in detail. They aim to explore a particular phenomenon , problem, or scenario within its natural socio-cultural context . Case studies allow researchers to analyze complex issues and uncover trends, patterns, and insights that may not be apparent through other research methods.

Case Study or Detective Story

Think of case studies as the Sherlock Holmes of the academic world. With their magnifying glass in hand, they scrutinize situations to uncover clues, motivations, and causes. Like a detective, a case study researcher collects evidence, interviews witnesses, and examines different perspectives to construct a comprehensive picture of the case.

Research Papers: The Masters of the Scientific Universe

Research papers, on the other hand, are a staple in the world of academia. They are scholarly articles that present the findings, methodology, and analysis of a specific research question or hypothesis. Research papers aim to contribute new knowledge and insights to the existing body of scientific literature . They follow a structured format and often conform to specific citation styles, such as APA or MLA.

Research Papers: The Heroic Quest for Knowledge

Imagine research papers as brave explorers venturing into uncharted territories of knowledge. Equipped with their hypothesis, they embark on a quest for truth, gathering data, conducting experiments, and analyzing results with scientific rigor. These papers don the armor of statistical tools, rigorous methodologies, and peer-reviewed sources to present valuable insights and move their field forward.

Key Differences: Puzzled by the Contrasts

Focus and scope.

Case studies primarily emphasize exploring and understanding the complexity of a single case or a small number of cases. They provide an in-depth analysis of the selected case, often incorporating diverse perspectives and rich contextual details . On the other hand, research papers adopt a broader lens, aiming to investigate general patterns, theories, or phenomena by analyzing a larger sample size or conducting experiments.

Methodology and Tools

Case studies rely on a wide range of data sources such as observations, interviews, surveys, and archival records. Researchers construct a narrative around the case, intertwining multiple sources to uncover the underlying dynamics. Research papers, however, employ a systematic methodology, involving hypothesis formulation, literature review, data collection, statistical analysis, and interpretation of findings. They often emphasize quantitative data, experiments, or surveys.

Generalizability and Impact

Due to their focus on specific cases, case studies are often unique and context-bound, limiting their generalizability to broader populations or situations. They serve as exemplars or exploratory research tools rather than establishing universal truths. Research papers, on the other hand, aim for generalizability and seek to contribute to existing knowledge by establishing theories, models, or frameworks applicable to a wider range of situations.

So, there you have it! While both case studies and research papers play crucial roles in academic research, they vary in terms of focus, methodology, and purpose. Case studies unravel mysteries through real-life examples, while research papers strive to advance knowledge through systematic inquiry. Understanding the distinctions between these two types of papers will empower you to choose the appropriate approach for your research goals. Happy writing!

Harvard Business School Case Studies. (n.d.). Retrieved October 10, 2023, from http://www.hbs.edu/teaching/case-method.html

University of California, Berkeley. (n.d.). Research Papers. Retrieved October 10, 2023, from http://teaching.berkeley.edu/research-papers

FAQ: What is the difference between a case study and a research paper?

Is case report the same as a case study.

No, they’re not the same. While both involve examining specific cases, a case report typically focuses on describing a particular medical condition or treatment, whereas a case study explores a broader issue or phenomenon.

What are the sources of a case study

A case study can be sourced from various mediums, including interviews, surveys, observations, and existing documentation such as medical records or historical archives. The choice of sources depends on the nature of the study and the available resources.

What is the difference between a case study and a research paper

While both involve research and analysis, the main difference lies in their objectives. A research paper aims to contribute to the existing body of knowledge by presenting original findings or theories, while a case study focuses on examining a specific instance or situation and drawing insights or lessons from it.

How many respondents should a case study have

The number of respondents in a case study depends on the research question and methodology. There is no fixed rule, as case studies often prioritize depth over breadth. Typically, case studies include a small number of participants or cases, enabling a detailed examination of each one.

How do you introduce a case study

When introducing a case study, start by providing a brief overview of the subject or issue being explored. Highlight the significance of the case and its relevance to the broader context. Engage the readers by creating an intriguing narrative that invites them to delve deeper into the study.

How long is a case study paper

The length of a case study paper is variable and depends on the depth of analysis and the intricacies of the case being examined. Generally, a case study can range from a few pages to several dozen pages. Quality and thoroughness matter more than the absolute length, ensuring all relevant details are included.

What is a case study for dummies

A case study for dummies is a beginner-friendly guide that explains the fundamental concepts and steps involved in conducting a case study. It breaks down the process, from selecting a research question to analyzing data and presenting findings. This guide is an excellent starting point for those new to case study research.

What is a case study paper

A case study paper is an in-depth analysis of a specific case, exploring its complexities and providing insights into a particular phenomenon. It typically includes background information, research objectives, methodology, analysis, and conclusions. Through well-documented evidence, a case study paper offers comprehensive understanding and potential solutions.

What is the sample size for a case study

The sample size in a case study tends to be smaller compared to other research methods. Rather than focusing on statistical representativeness, case studies prioritize depth and richness of information. Therefore, researchers carefully select a limited number of cases or participants, ensuring they can thoroughly analyze and interpret the data collected.

What is a case study in a database

A case study in a database refers to a repository of detailed and well-documented cases that serve as valuable resources for further research and analysis. Such databases compile a range of case studies from various fields, enabling users to explore different methodologies, findings, and implications. These databases are invaluable tools for researchers seeking inspiration, references, or comparative cases.

Remember: A case study provides a deep dive into a situation, while a research paper contributes to the wider body of knowledge. So, whether you’re aiming to explore a specific case or advance scientific understanding, understanding the nuances of case studies and research papers is essential for academic success.

That’s a wrap for our FAQ on the difference between case studies and research papers. Happy studying and writing!

• key differences
• methodology
• new knowledge
• real-life situations
• research paper
• researchers
• small number
• statistical tools

What Does 32S Mean in Jeans? Understanding Jean Sizes and Fit

Can you mix ground pork and ground beef together, you may also like, how to get papers for a pitbull without papers.

• by Lindsey Smith
• October 10, 2023

A Comprehensive Guide to the Characteristics of a Narrative Quest

• October 8, 2023

Does the 2010 Hyundai Elantra Have Bluetooth?

• by Veronica Lopez
• October 27, 2023

Are Sixpences Worth Anything? A Look at the Value of Old Coins

• by Erin Fuentes

Is it Safe to Microwave Tape?

• October 28, 2023

What Can You Say Instead of LOL?

• October 13, 2023

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock Locked padlock icon ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

• Publications
• Account settings
• Advanced Search
• Journal List

Distinguishing case study as a research method from case reports as a publication type

Kristine m alpi , mls, mph, phd, ahip, john jamal evans , phd.

• Author information
• Article notes
• Copyright and License information

Received 2018 Oct 1; Accepted 2018 Oct 1; Issue date 2019 Jan.

Articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License .

The purpose of this editorial is to distinguish between case reports and case studies. In health, case reports are familiar ways of sharing events or efforts of intervening with single patients with previously unreported features. As a qualitative methodology, case study research encompasses a great deal more complexity than a typical case report and often incorporates multiple streams of data combined in creative ways. The depth and richness of case study description helps readers understand the case and whether findings might be applicable beyond that setting.

Single-institution descriptive reports of library activities are often labeled by their authors as “case studies.” By contrast, in health care, single patient retrospective descriptions are published as “case reports.” Both case reports and case studies are valuable to readers and provide a publication opportunity for authors. A previous editorial by Akers and Amos about improving case studies addresses issues that are more common to case reports; for example, not having a review of the literature or being anecdotal, not generalizable, and prone to various types of bias such as positive outcome bias [ 1 ]. However, case study research as a qualitative methodology is pursued for different purposes than generalizability. The authors’ purpose in this editorial is to clearly distinguish between case reports and case studies. We believe that this will assist authors in describing and designating the methodological approach of their publications and help readers appreciate the rigor of well-executed case study research.

Case reports often provide a first exploration of a phenomenon or an opportunity for a first publication by a trainee in the health professions. In health care, case reports are familiar ways of sharing events or efforts of intervening with single patients with previously unreported features. Another type of study categorized as a case report is an “N of 1” study or single-subject clinical trial, which considers an individual patient as the sole unit of observation in a study investigating the efficacy or side effect profiles of different interventions. Entire journals have evolved to publish case reports, which often rely on template structures with limited contextualization or discussion of previous cases. Examples that are indexed in MEDLINE include the American Journal of Case Reports , BMJ Case Reports, Journal of Medical Case Reports, and Journal of Radiology Case Reports . Similar publications appear in veterinary medicine and are indexed in CAB Abstracts, such as Case Reports in Veterinary Medicine and Veterinary Record Case Reports .

As a qualitative methodology, however, case study research encompasses a great deal more complexity than a typical case report and often incorporates multiple streams of data combined in creative ways. Distinctions include the investigator’s definitions and delimitations of the case being studied, the clarity of the role of the investigator, the rigor of gathering and combining evidence about the case, and the contextualization of the findings. Delimitation is a term from qualitative research about setting boundaries to scope the research in a useful way rather than describing the narrow scope as a limitation, as often appears in a discussion section. The depth and richness of description helps readers understand the situation and whether findings from the case are applicable to their settings.

CASE STUDY AS A RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Case study as a qualitative methodology is an exploration of a time- and space-bound phenomenon. As qualitative research, case studies require much more from their authors who are acting as instruments within the inquiry process. In the case study methodology, a variety of methodological approaches may be employed to explain the complexity of the problem being studied [ 2 , 3 ].

Leading authors diverge in their definitions of case study, but a qualitative research text introduces case study as follows:

Case study research is defined as a qualitative approach in which the investigator explores a real-life, contemporary bounded system (a case) or multiple bound systems (cases) over time, through detailed, in-depth data collection involving multiple sources of information, and reports a case description and case themes. The unit of analysis in the case study might be multiple cases (a multisite study) or a single case (a within-site case study). [ 4 ]

Methodologists writing core texts on case study research include Yin [ 5 ], Stake [ 6 ], and Merriam [ 7 ]. The approaches of these three methodologists have been compared by Yazan, who focused on six areas of methodology: epistemology (beliefs about ways of knowing), definition of cases, design of case studies, and gathering, analysis, and validation of data [ 8 ]. For Yin, case study is a method of empirical inquiry appropriate to determining the “how and why” of phenomena and contributes to understanding phenomena in a holistic and real-life context [ 5 ]. Stake defines a case study as a “well-bounded, specific, complex, and functioning thing” [ 6 ], while Merriam views “the case as a thing, a single entity, a unit around which there are boundaries” [ 7 ].

Case studies are ways to explain, describe, or explore phenomena. Comments from a quantitative perspective about case studies lacking rigor and generalizability fail to consider the purpose of the case study and how what is learned from a case study is put into practice. Rigor in case studies comes from the research design and its components, which Yin outlines as (a) the study’s questions, (b) the study’s propositions, (c) the unit of analysis, (d) the logic linking the data to propositions, and (e) the criteria for interpreting the findings [ 5 ]. Case studies should also provide multiple sources of data, a case study database, and a clear chain of evidence among the questions asked, the data collected, and the conclusions drawn [ 5 ].

Sources of evidence for case studies include interviews, documentation, archival records, direct observations, participant-observation, and physical artifacts. One of the most important sources for data in qualitative case study research is the interview [ 2 , 3 ]. In addition to interviews, documents and archival records can be gathered to corroborate and enhance the findings of the study. To understand the phenomenon or the conditions that created it, direct observations can serve as another source of evidence and can be conducted throughout the study. These can include the use of formal and informal protocols as a participant inside the case or an external or passive observer outside of the case [ 5 ]. Lastly, physical artifacts can be observed and collected as a form of evidence. With these multiple potential sources of evidence, the study methodology includes gathering data, sense-making, and triangulating multiple streams of data. Figure 1 shows an example in which data used for the case started with a pilot study to provide additional context to guide more in-depth data collection and analysis with participants.

Key sources of data for a sample case study

VARIATIONS ON CASE STUDY METHODOLOGY

Case study methodology is evolving and regularly reinterpreted. Comparative or multiple case studies are used as a tool for synthesizing information across time and space to research the impact of policy and practice in various fields of social research [ 9 ]. Because case study research is in-depth and intensive, there have been efforts to simplify the method or select useful components of cases for focused analysis. Micro-case study is a term that is occasionally used to describe research on micro-level cases [ 10 ]. These are cases that occur in a brief time frame, occur in a confined setting, and are simple and straightforward in nature. A micro-level case describes a clear problem of interest. Reporting is very brief and about specific points. The lack of complexity in the case description makes obvious the “lesson” that is inherent in the case; although no definitive “solution” is necessarily forthcoming, making the case useful for discussion. A micro-case write-up can be distinguished from a case report by its focus on briefly reporting specific features of a case or cases to analyze or learn from those features.

DATABASE INDEXING OF CASE REPORTS AND CASE STUDIES

Disciplines such as education, psychology, sociology, political science, and social work regularly publish rich case studies that are relevant to particular areas of health librarianship. Case reports and case studies have been defined as publication types or subject terms by several databases that are relevant to librarian authors: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and ERIC. Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts (LISTA) does not have a subject term or publication type related to cases, despite many being included in the database. Whereas “Case Reports” are the main term used by MEDLINE’s Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and PsycINFO’s thesaurus, CINAHL and ERIC use “Case Studies.”

Case reports in MEDLINE and PsycINFO focus on clinical case documentation. In MeSH, “Case Reports” as a publication type is specific to “clinical presentations that may be followed by evaluative studies that eventually lead to a diagnosis” [ 11 ]. “Case Histories,” “Case Studies,” and “Case Study” are all entry terms mapping to “Case Reports”; however, guidance to indexers suggests that “Case Reports” should not be applied to institutional case reports and refers to the heading “Organizational Case Studies,” which is defined as “descriptions and evaluations of specific health care organizations” [ 12 ].

PsycINFO’s subject term “Case Report” is “used in records discussing issues involved in the process of conducting exploratory studies of single or multiple clinical cases.” The Methodology index offers clinical and non-clinical entries. “Clinical Case Study” is defined as “case reports that include disorder, diagnosis, and clinical treatment for individuals with mental or medical illnesses,” whereas “Non-clinical Case Study” is a “document consisting of non-clinical or organizational case examples of the concepts being researched or studied. The setting is always non-clinical and does not include treatment-related environments” [ 13 ].

Both CINAHL and ERIC acknowledge the depth of analysis in case study methodology. The CINAHL scope note for the thesaurus term “Case Studies” distinguishes between the document and the methodology, though both use the same term: “a review of a particular condition, disease, or administrative problem. Also, a research method that involves an in-depth analysis of an individual, group, institution, or other social unit. For material that contains a case study, search for document type: case study.” The ERIC scope note for the thesaurus term “Case Studies” is simple: “detailed analyses, usually focusing on a particular problem of an individual, group, or organization” [ 14 ].

PUBLICATION OF CASE STUDY RESEARCH IN LIBRARIANSHIP

We call your attention to a few examples published as case studies in health sciences librarianship to consider how their characteristics fit with the preceding definitions of case reports or case study research. All present some characteristics of case study research, but their treatment of the research questions, richness of description, and analytic strategies vary in depth and, therefore, diverge at some level from the qualitative case study research approach. This divergence, particularly in richness of description and analysis, may have been constrained by the publication requirements.

As one example, a case study by Janke and Rush documented a time- and context-bound collaboration involving a librarian and a nursing faculty member [ 15 ]. Three objectives were stated: (1) describing their experience of working together on an interprofessional research team, (2) evaluating the value of the librarian role from librarian and faculty member perspectives, and (3) relating findings to existing literature. Elements that signal the qualitative nature of this case study are that the authors were the research participants and their use of the term “evaluation” is reflection on their experience. This reads like a case study that could have been enriched by including other types of data gathered from others engaging with this team to broaden the understanding of the collaboration.

As another example, the description of the academic context is one of the most salient components of the case study written by Clairoux et al., which had the objectives of (1) describing the library instruction offered and learning assessments used at a single health sciences library and (2) discussing the positive outcomes of instruction in that setting [ 16 ]. The authors focus on sharing what the institution has done more than explaining why this institution is an exemplar to explore a focused question or understand the phenomenon of library instruction. However, like a case study, the analysis brings together several streams of data including course attendance, online material page views, and some discussion of results from surveys. This paper reads somewhat in between an institutional case report and a case study.

The final example is a single author reporting on a personal experience of creating and executing the role of research informationist for a National Institutes of Health (NIH)–funded research team [ 17 ]. There is a thoughtful review of the informationist literature and detailed descriptions of the institutional context and the process of gaining access to and participating in the new role. However, the motivating question in the abstract does not seem to be fully addressed through analysis from either the reflective perspective of the author as the research participant or consideration of other streams of data from those involved in the informationist experience. The publication reads more like a case report about this informationist’s experience than a case study that explores the research informationist experience through the selection of this case.

All of these publications are well written and useful for their intended audiences, but in general, they are much shorter and much less rich in depth than case studies published in social sciences research. It may be that the authors have been constrained by word counts or page limits. For example, the submission category for Case Studies in the Journal of the Medical Library Association (JMLA) limited them to 3,000 words and defined them as “articles describing the process of developing, implementing, and evaluating a new service, program, or initiative, typically in a single institution or through a single collaborative effort” [ 18 ]. This definition’s focus on novelty and description sounds much more like the definition of case report than the in-depth, detailed investigation of a time- and space-bound problem that is often examined through case study research.

Problem-focused or question-driven case study research would benefit from the space provided for Original Investigations that employ any type of quantitative or qualitative method of analysis. One of the best examples in the JMLA of an in-depth multiple case study that was authored by a librarian who published the findings from her doctoral dissertation represented all the elements of a case study. In eight pages, she provided a theoretical basis for the research question, a pilot study, and a multiple case design, including integrated data from interviews and focus groups [ 19 ].

We have distinguished between case reports and case studies primarily to assist librarians who are new to research and critical appraisal of case study methodology to recognize the features that authors use to describe and designate the methodological approaches of their publications. For researchers who are new to case research methodology and are interested in learning more, Hancock and Algozzine provide a guide [ 20 ].

We hope that JMLA readers appreciate the rigor of well-executed case study research. We believe that distinguishing between descriptive case reports and analytic case studies in the journal’s submission categories will allow the depth of case study methodology to increase. We also hope that authors feel encouraged to pursue submitting relevant case studies or case reports for future publication.

Editor’s note: In response to this invited editorial, the Journal of the Medical Library Association will consider manuscripts employing rigorous qualitative case study methodology to be Original Investigations (fewer than 5,000 words), whereas manuscripts describing the process of developing, implementing, and assessing a new service, program, or initiative—typically in a single institution or through a single collaborative effort—will be considered to be Case Reports (formerly known as Case Studies; fewer than 3,000 words).

• 1. Akers KG, Amos K. Publishing case studies in health sciences librarianship [editorial] J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Apr;105(2):115–8. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2017.212. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 2. Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. 4th ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE; 2018. [ Google Scholar ]
• 3. Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. 4th ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE; 2009. [ Google Scholar ]
• 4. Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2014. [ Google Scholar ]
• 5. Yin RK. Case study research and applications: design and methods. 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2018. [ Google Scholar ]
• 6. Stake RE. The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 1995. [ Google Scholar ]
• 7. Merriam SB. Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1998. [ Google Scholar ]
• 8. Yazan B. Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. Qual Rep. 2015;20(2):134–52. [ Google Scholar ]
• 9. Bartlett L, Vavrus F. Rethinking case study research: a comparative approach. New York, NY: Routledge; 2017. [ Google Scholar ]
• 10. Walsh RW. Exploring the case study method as a tool for teaching public administration in a cross-national context: pedagogy in theory and practice. European Group of Public Administration Conference, International Institute of Administrative Sciences; 2006. [ Google Scholar ]
• 11. National Library of Medicine. Case reports: MeSH descriptor data 2018 [Internet] The Library; [cited 1 Sep 2018]. < https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov/record/ui?ui=D002363 >. [ Google Scholar ]
• 12. National Library of Medicine. Organizational case studies: MeSH descriptor data 2018 [Internet] The Library; [cited 26 Oct 2018]. < https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov/record/ui?ui=D019982 >. [ Google Scholar ]
• 13. American Psychological Association. APA databases methodology field values [Internet] The Association; 2016. [cited 1 Sep 2018]. < http://www.apa.org/pubs/databases/training/method-values.aspx >. [ Google Scholar ]
• 14. ERIC. Case studies [Internet] ERIC; [cited 1 Sep 2018]. < https://eric.ed.gov/?ti=Case+Studies >. [ Google Scholar ]
• 15. Janke R, Rush K. The academic librarian as co-investigator on an interprofessional primary research team: a case study. Health Inf Libr J. 2014;31(2):116–22. doi: 10.1111/hir.12063. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 16. Clairoux N, Desbiens S, Clar M, Dupont P, St Jean M. Integrating information literacy in health sciences curricula: a case study from Québec. Health Inf Libr J. 2013;30(3):201–11. doi: 10.1111/hir.12025. [ DOI ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 17. Federer L. The librarian as research informationist: a case study. J Med Libr Assoc. 2013 Oct;101(4):298–302. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.101.4.011. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.101.4.011. [ DOI ] [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 18. Medical Library Association. Journal of the Medical Library Association author guidelines: submission categories and format guidelines [Internet] The Association; [cited 1 Sep 2018]. < http://jmla.mlanet.org/ojs/jmla/about/submissions >. [ Google Scholar ]
• 19. Martin ER. Team effectiveness in academic medical libraries: a multiple case study. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Jul;94(3):271–8. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• 20. Hancock DR, Algozzine B. Doing case study research: a practical guide for beginning researchers. New York, NY: Teachers College Press; 2017. [ Google Scholar ]
• View on publisher site
• PDF (185.2 KB)
• Collections

Similar articles

Cited by other articles, links to ncbi databases.

• Download .nbib .nbib
• Format: AMA APA MLA NLM

Add to Collections

• Privacy Policy

Home » Case Study – Methods, Examples and Guide

Case Study – Methods, Examples and Guide

Table of Contents

A case study is an in-depth examination of a single case or a few selected cases within a real-world context. Case study research is widely used across disciplines such as psychology, sociology, business, and education to explore complex phenomena in detail. Unlike other research methods that aim for broad generalizations, case studies offer an intensive understanding of a specific individual, group, event, or situation.

A case study is a research method that involves a detailed examination of a subject (the “case”) within its real-life context. Case studies are used to explore the causes of underlying principles, behaviors, or outcomes, providing insights into the nuances of the studied phenomena. This approach allows researchers to capture a wide array of factors and interactions that may not be visible in other methods, such as experiments or surveys.

Key Characteristics of Case Studies :

• Focus on a specific case, individual, or event.
• Provide in-depth analysis and contextual understanding.
• Useful for exploring new or complex phenomena.
• Generate rich qualitative data that contributes to theory building.

Types of Case Studies

Case studies can be classified into different types depending on their purpose and methodology. Common types include exploratory , descriptive , explanatory , intrinsic , and instrumental case studies.

1. Exploratory Case Study

Definition : An exploratory case study investigates an area where little is known. It helps to identify questions, variables, and hypotheses for future research.

Characteristics :

• Often used in the early stages of research.
• Focuses on discovery and hypothesis generation.
• Helps clarify research questions.

Example : Examining how remote work affects team dynamics in an organization that has recently transitioned to a work-from-home model.

2. Descriptive Case Study

Definition : A descriptive case study provides a detailed account of a particular case, describing it within its context. The goal is to provide a complete and accurate depiction without necessarily exploring underlying causes.

• Focuses on describing the case in detail.
• Provides comprehensive data to paint a clear picture of the phenomenon.
• Helps understand “what” happened without delving into “why.”

Example : Documenting the process and outcomes of a corporate restructuring within a company, describing the actions taken and their immediate effects.

3. Explanatory Case Study

Definition : An explanatory case study aims to explain the cause-and-effect relationships of a particular case. It focuses on understanding “how” or “why” something happened.

• Useful for causal analysis.
• Aims to provide insights into mechanisms and processes.
• Often used in social sciences and psychology to study behavior and interactions.

Example : Investigating why a school’s test scores improved significantly after implementing a new teaching method.

4. Intrinsic Case Study

Definition : An intrinsic case study focuses on a unique or interesting case, not because of what it represents but because of its intrinsic value. The researcher’s interest lies in understanding the case itself.

• Driven by the researcher’s interest in the particular case.
• Not meant to generalize findings to broader contexts.
• Focuses on gaining a deep understanding of the specific case.

Example : Studying a particularly successful start-up to understand its founder’s unique leadership style.

5. Instrumental Case Study

Definition : An instrumental case study examines a particular case to gain insights into a broader issue. The case serves as a tool for understanding something more general.

• The case itself is not the focus; rather, it is a vehicle for exploring broader principles or theories.
• Helps apply findings to similar situations or cases.
• Useful for theory testing or development.

Example : Studying a well-known patient’s therapy process to understand the general principles of effective psychological treatment.

Methods of Conducting a Case Study

Case studies can involve various research methods to collect data and analyze the case comprehensively. The primary methods include interviews , observations , document analysis , and surveys .

1. Interviews

Definition : Interviews allow researchers to gather in-depth information from individuals involved in the case. These interviews can be structured, semi-structured, or unstructured, depending on the study’s goals.

• Develop a list of open-ended questions aligned with the study’s objectives.
• Conduct interviews with individuals directly or indirectly involved in the case.
• Record, transcribe, and analyze the responses to identify key themes.

Example : Interviewing employees, managers, and clients in a company to understand the effects of a new business strategy.

2. Observations

Definition : Observations involve watching and recording behaviors, actions, and events within the case’s natural setting. This method provides first-hand data on interactions, routines, and environmental factors.

• Define the behaviors and interactions to observe.
• Conduct observations systematically, noting relevant details.
• Analyze patterns and connections in the observed data.

Example : Observing interactions between teachers and students in a classroom to evaluate the effectiveness of a teaching method.

3. Document Analysis

Definition : Document analysis involves reviewing existing documents related to the case, such as reports, emails, memos, policies, or archival records. This provides historical and contextual data that can complement other data sources.

• Identify relevant documents that offer insights into the case.
• Systematically review and code the documents for themes or categories.
• Compare document findings with data from interviews and observations.

Example : Analyzing company policies, performance reports, and emails to study the process of implementing a new organizational structure.

Definition : Surveys are structured questionnaires administered to a group of people involved in the case. Surveys are especially useful for gathering quantitative data that supports or complements qualitative findings.

• Design survey questions that align with the research goals.
• Distribute the survey to a sample of participants.
• Analyze the survey responses, often using statistical methods.

Example : Conducting a survey among customers to measure satisfaction levels after a service redesign.

Case Study Guide: Step-by-Step Process

Step 1: define the research questions.

• Clearly outline what you aim to understand or explain.
• Define specific questions that the case study will answer, such as “What factors led to X outcome?”

Step 2: Select the Case(s)

• Choose a case (or cases) that are relevant to your research question.
• Ensure that the case is feasible to study, accessible, and likely to yield meaningful data.

Step 3: Determine the Data Collection Methods

• Decide which methods (e.g., interviews, observations, document analysis) will best capture the information needed.
• Consider combining multiple methods to gather rich, well-rounded data.

Step 4: Collect Data

• Gather data using your chosen methods, following ethical guidelines such as informed consent and confidentiality.
• Take comprehensive notes and record interviews or observations when possible.

Step 5: Analyze the Data

• Organize the data into themes, patterns, or categories.
• Use qualitative or quantitative analysis methods, depending on the nature of the data.
• Compare findings across data sources to identify consistencies and discrepancies.

Step 6: Interpret Findings

• Draw conclusions based on the analysis, relating the findings to your research questions.
• Consider alternative explanations and assess the generalizability of your findings.

Step 7: Report Results

• Write a detailed report that presents your findings and explains their implications.
• Discuss the limitations of the case study and potential directions for future research.

Examples of Case Study Applications

• Objective : To understand the success factors of a high-growth tech company.
• Methods : Interviews with key executives, analysis of internal reports, and customer satisfaction surveys.
• Outcome : Insights into unique management practices and customer engagement strategies.
• Objective : To examine the impact of project-based learning on student engagement.
• Methods : Observations in classrooms, interviews with teachers, and analysis of student performance data.
• Outcome : Evidence of increased engagement and enhanced critical thinking skills among students.
• Objective : To explore the effectiveness of a new mental health intervention.
• Methods : Interviews with patients, assessment of clinical outcomes, and reviews of therapist notes.
• Outcome : Identification of factors that contribute to successful treatment outcomes.
• Objective : To assess the impact of urban development on local wildlife.
• Methods : Observations of wildlife, analysis of environmental data, and interviews with residents.
• Outcome : Findings showing the effects of urban sprawl on species distribution and biodiversity.

Case studies are valuable for in-depth exploration and understanding of complex phenomena within their real-life contexts. By using methods such as interviews, observations, document analysis, and surveys, researchers can obtain comprehensive data and generate insights that are specific to the case. Whether exploratory, descriptive, or explanatory, case studies offer unique opportunities for understanding and discovering practical applications for theories.

• Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers . The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.
• Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
• Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research . SAGE Publications.
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
• Thomas, G. (2016). How to Do Your Case Study (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Textual Analysis – Types, Examples and Guide

Applied Research – Types, Methods and Examples

Transformative Design – Methods, Types, Guide

Focus Groups – Steps, Examples and Guide

Mixed Methods Research – Types & Analysis

Research Methods – Types, Examples and Guide

Distinguishing Between Case Study & Research Methods

When completing a thesis, students are often required to write both case studies and research papers, but many students have difficulty differentiating between the two. Understanding the differences in writing styles and content is crucial, as it can ultimately impact the grades they receive from their teachers.

A case study focuses on a specific subject, such as a person, company, product, or event. When writing about a company, for example, it is important to provide an engaging introduction by including a few paragraphs about the company’s history and growth. After presenting the company from various perspectives, the focus should shift to the specific problem being addressed, as well as the reasons for choosing this issue. Finally, a case study should conclude with suggestions and recommendations for addressing the selected problems.

Research Paper

A research paper, on the other hand, requires students to explore various perspectives on a particular subject, developing their own views through extensive reading and analysis. This process typically involves referencing other research studies and citing the works of other authors, which is an important component of a research paper.

Key Takeaways

• The main difference between a case study and research is that a case study does not require a review of previous studies on the subject, while a research paper does.
• A case study focuses solely on the specific subject being presented, whereas a research paper includes generalizations and multiple perspectives.
• A research paper requires proper citations and references to other works, while a case study does not.

LEAVE A REPLY Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Related Articles

Difference between power & authority, distinguishing could of & could have, distinguishing pixie & bob haircuts, distinguishing between debate & discussion, distinguishing between dialogue & conversation, distinguishing between a present & a gift, distinguishing between will & can, distinguishing between up & upon.

• Assignment Help

Difference Between Research Paper and Case Study

Author : Charles Hill

Table of Content

What is a Research Paper?

What is a case study, difference case scenarios in case study and research paper, one additional difference between the two in the end.

Finding yourself between the roadblocks of a research paper and case study is something many students come across. The difference between the two is immense, and students fail to understand this difference. They often confuse the two, increasing the likelihood of writing one in the case of the other. This means when it was a research paper, you made a case study or vice versa. While this is a hypothetical situation, some students think both are the same on a base level of knowledge. Also, it is quite common for students to be confused between the two. How?

Not knowing what the case study and research paper difference is arises from their similarities in conducting research. Somewhere, both academic writing assignments involve the students doing thorough research and investigating a particular matter. While it makes both of them quite similar, the purpose, methodologies, and even target audience differ between the two. You should know the difference between the two so that when you are creating any of these or both, you know what your approach should be. Here, we are providing you with a comprehensive introduction to the differences between the research paper and the case study.

Before knowing the difference between a research paper and case study, let’s get to know each of these individually. First, starting off with the research paper, what is a research paper? A research paper is academic writing material that provides an explanation and an overview of a particular topic or inquiry. In a research paper, you contribute to the existing knowledge of your particular field of study. This being said, research papers involve quantitative and qualitative research methods. It contributes to the scholarly discourse within the particular field of your subject.

Now that you know what a research paper is, let’s kick start knowing about the case study and research paper difference. Following the introduction to the research paper, it is the turn of the case study. What is a case study? A case study is an elaborative and detailed investigation into a particular topic or instance to provide a deeper understanding and interpretation. A case study includes mostly qualitative forms of data collection and analysis. It involves the analysis of a phenomenon, person, group, event, organization or situation within the context of a real-world situation. It aims to understand the complexity of that particular subject.

With the explanation of a mentor providing help with assignment  to students, we will dive deeper into the particular case scenarios or specifications of both kinds of writing. Knowing about the specific differences will allow you to take a smarter approach to writing each of them whenever there is a requirement from your university. You must remember that while both of them are academic writing materials in your coursework, both serve different purposes, employ different methodologies, and even have different target audiences. Here is a comprehensive overview of the differences between the two in their respective specifications:

A research paper and case study differ in their purpose of writing because while a research paper is written to provide new information, case studies provide in-depth studies into a particular subject. The primary purpose of a research paper is to provide fresh insights into the particular field of study. It involves original research, theoretical analysis, literature review and sometimes a research question or hypothesis. A case study, on the other hand, focuses on a particular instance, phenomenon or event to represent an elaborative context of the real-world scenario in terms of the trends, theories or principles that exist in the field.

The difference case study and research paper represent through their scope is widely differentiating. While research papers are broader in scope than the case study, it focuses on the scholarly discussions. A case study typically focuses on a single case or instance and provides a detailed description with a proper examination of the subject matter. Research papers are structured around a central argument to provide participants with particular findings.

3. Methodology

Research papers use a wide range of research methods to conduct a study on a particular subject or topic. Taking a research paper assignment help  will show you examples of how research papers only utilize quantitative data. This is because the methodology of a research paper is focused on testing hypotheses and exploring research questions proposed in the assignment. On the other hand, a case study often uses qualitative methods such as interviews, observations or documents, though it can also use quantitative empirical research.

4. Audience

Since research papers and case studies serve different purposes, they are related to different sets of audiences as well. Having a different audience is one of the reasons why a research paper and case study are different. Research papers are published in academic journals and conference papers for scholars, researchers, and other academic professionals. These contribute to the knowledge and influence further studies and theoretical developments within the field. On the other hand, while case studies can also be published in academic journals, they are also used in particular contexts of professional studies in fields like business, medicine and law.

Another major difference between the two is the structure of writing. While research papers generally have a structured format, case studies can vary in their structure. While both involve the same elements of any academic writing, it depends on the particular subject or requirements of your assignment. Whether you want help with a research paper or a case study assignment help , our mentors are available for you!

The amount of expertise and knowledge they carry will allow you to have genuine feedback on how to write your academic materials. They will also help you refine your work and enhance the quality of the presentation. When you will take our assistance, you will have other value-added services. Do not procrastinate much, and get in touch with us to learn more. Register now!

Related Study Materials

• No resource found related to this post

Enjoy HD Grade Assignments without overpaying Save More. Score Better. Bless YOU!

Loved reading this Blog? Share your valuable thoughts in the comment section.

About the Author

Charles Hill

Charles writes blogs and articles for students who are facing problems with their management assignments. His articles have been featured on several websites. He has contributed to the academic enhancement of students from the University of Oxford, University of Cambridge, University College London, etc. He joined the team of My Assignment Services as a consulting expert and now is a full-time academic help provider. His expertise in the field of management covers topics like leadership management, human resource management, business management and several others. His blogs focus on solving the most complex of the queries and simplifying the processes.

ClustalW- Improve the Progressive Alignment in Academic Projects

Catia software- a comprehensive guide for students, related posts.

Purple House Case Study - How They Empower Communities and Individuals

May 11, 2022

70+ Trending Case Study Topics That You Must Know

April 08, 2024

How to Write Edith Case Study?

July 14, 2022

Get Quote in 5 Minutes*

• Australia (+61)
• United Kingdom (+44)
• United States of America (+1)
• Canada (+1)
• Europe (+3)
• Saudi Arabia (+966)
• United Arab Emirates (+971)
• Singapore (+65)
• South Africa (+27)
• Germany (+49)
• Hong Kong (+8)
• India (+91)
• Ireland (+353)
• Jordan (+962)
• Kenya (+254)
• Malaysia (+60)
• New Zealand (+64)
• Nigeria (+234)
• Pakistan (+92)
• Sweden (+46)

1,212,718 Orders

4.9/5 Rating

5,063 Experts

Trending now

How to Write a Reflection Paragraph in an Assignment?

Project management assignment sample online, project proposal assignment sample online, how to solve cubic equation ax^3+ bx^2+ cx+d = 0, impact of western systems and structures on aboriginal and torres strait islander cultures, how to write an executive summary (see our sample), best digital marketing assignment sample online, marketing assignment sample online, advantages & disadvantages of conceptual framework (cf) in accounting, how to write gibbs reflective cycle, why are ethics important in research, business management assignment sample online.

The Student Corner

Subscribe to get updates, offers and assignment tips right in your inbox.

Popular Posts

• Assignment Help How to Write a Reflection Paragraph in an Assignment? Jeffery June 16, 2018
• Management Project Management Assignment Sample Online Macey October 04, 2017
• Assignment Help Project Proposal Assignment Sample Online Jeffery October 25, 2017
• Engineering How To Solve Cubic Equation Ax^3+ Bx^2+ Cx+D = 0 Jonathan March 22, 2019
• General Impact of Western Systems and Structures on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultures Bill January 15, 2020
• Marketing How to Write an Executive Summary (See Our Sample) Benny Carter May 11, 2018

Download Guide Book

• Australia(+61)
• Germany(+49)
• Hong kong(+8)
• Ireland(+353)
• Jordan(+962)
• Kenya(+254)
• Malaysia(+60)
• New zealand(+64)
• Nigeria(+234)
• Pakistan(+92)
• Saudi arabia(+966)
• Singapore(+65)
• South africa(+27)
• Sweden(+46)
• United arab emirates(+971)
• United kingdom(+44)
• United states america(+1)
• Assessment Help
• Do My Assignment
• Dissertation Writing Services
• Coursework Help
• Uni Assignment Help
• Thesis Help
• CDR Report Writing
• Editing & Proofreading
• Research Proposal Help
• Nursing Assignment Help
• Accounting Assignment Help
• Law Assignment Help
• Management Assignment Help
• Math Assignment Help
• Programming Assignment Help
• Finance Assignment Help
• Java Assignment Help
• Economics Assignment Help
• Marketing Assignment Help
• Nursing Assignment Sample
• Law Assignment Sample
• Management Assignment Sample
• Economics Assignment Sample
• Engineering Assignment Sample
• IT Assignment Sample
• Marketing Assignment Sample
• Accounting Assignment Sample
• Statistics Assignment Sample
• Finance Assignment Sample
• Free Samples
• Reviews 4.5/5
• Help & Support
• Our Policies
• Request Callback
• Phone / WhatsApp
• +61 435 881 621

• [email protected]

Searching across 1 Million Samples...

Doing your Assignment with our samples is simple, take Expert assistance to ensure HD Grades. Here you Go....

🚨Don't Leave Empty-Handed!🚨

Snag a Sweet 70% OFF on Your Assignments! 📚💡

Grab it while it's hot!🔥

Hurry, Offer Expires Soon 🚀🚀

Case Study vs. Concept Paper

What's the difference.

A case study is a detailed analysis of a specific situation, event, or individual, often used in academic or professional settings to illustrate a particular concept or theory. It typically involves collecting and analyzing data to provide a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter. On the other hand, a concept paper is a brief document that outlines a proposed research project or idea, providing a clear and concise overview of the topic, research questions, and methodology. While both case studies and concept papers serve to explore and explain complex topics, case studies delve deeper into a specific case, while concept papers provide a broader overview of a proposed research project.

Further Detail

Introduction.

Case studies and concept papers are both valuable tools in research and academia. While they serve different purposes, they share some similarities in terms of structure and content. In this article, we will compare the attributes of case studies and concept papers to highlight their differences and similarities.

A case study is a detailed analysis of a particular individual, group, event, or situation. It involves collecting and analyzing data to understand the complexities of the subject under study. On the other hand, a concept paper is a brief document that outlines a research project or proposal. It provides a clear overview of the research problem, objectives, methodology, and significance of the study.

The primary purpose of a case study is to provide in-depth insights into a specific case or phenomenon. It aims to explore the complexities and nuances of the subject to draw meaningful conclusions. In contrast, a concept paper is designed to outline the key components of a research project and justify its importance. It serves as a roadmap for the research study and helps researchers clarify their ideas.

Case studies are typically more detailed and comprehensive than concept papers. They delve deep into the subject matter, often using multiple sources of data and analysis techniques. Case studies may involve interviews, observations, and archival research to gather information. On the other hand, concept papers are more concise and focused. They provide a high-level overview of the research project without going into extensive detail.

Both case studies and concept papers follow a structured format, but there are some differences in their organization. A typical case study includes an introduction, background information, methodology, findings, discussion, and conclusion. It presents a narrative of the case and analyzes the data to draw conclusions. In contrast, a concept paper usually consists of an introduction, problem statement, objectives, methodology, and significance of the study. It outlines the key components of the research project in a logical sequence.

One of the key differences between case studies and concept papers is the level of analysis involved. Case studies require a detailed analysis of the data collected, often using qualitative or quantitative methods. Researchers must interpret the findings and draw conclusions based on the evidence presented. Concept papers, on the other hand, focus more on outlining the research project and justifying its importance. They may include a brief literature review to support the research problem but do not require extensive analysis.

Application

Case studies are commonly used in fields such as psychology, sociology, and business to explore real-life situations and phenomena. They provide valuable insights into human behavior, organizational dynamics, and social issues. Concept papers, on the other hand, are often used in the early stages of research projects to outline the key components of the study. They help researchers clarify their ideas and seek feedback from peers and mentors before embarking on the research.

In conclusion, case studies and concept papers serve different purposes in research and academia. While case studies provide in-depth insights into specific cases or phenomena, concept papers outline the key components of a research project. Both tools have their unique strengths and applications, and researchers should choose the appropriate method based on their research goals and objectives.

Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.

Guilherme Mazui

• What is the Difference Between Case Study and Research?

The main difference between a case study and research lies in the scope and focus of the investigation.

Case Study :

• In-depth exploration of a specific phenomenon, group, event, organization, or situation.
• Focuses on observing and analyzing a particular ongoing phenomenon.
• Relies on qualitative data like interviews, observations, and documents.
• Useful for analyzing data at a small level.
• Researcher may be part of the case study.
• Broader inquiry into a topic or question.
• Aims to contribute to knowledge, address questions, solve problems, or enhance understanding in various fields.
• Uses diverse methods, both qualitative and quantitative, such as experiments, surveys, and data analysis.
• Establishes generalizable principles, patterns, or trends that can be applied beyond the specific context under investigation.

In summary, a case study provides a detailed exploration of specific circumstances or instances, while research is a broader inquiry into a topic or question, often encompassing diverse methodologies and contributing to a deeper understanding of a subject beyond the specific context under investigation.

Comparative Table: Case Study vs Research

Here is a table comparing the differences between a case study and research:

• Case Study vs Scientific Research
• Theory vs Research
• Case Study vs Experiment
• Case Study vs Case History
• Case Study vs Survey
• Case Study vs Descriptive Approach to Research
• Case Study vs Solved Case Study
• Research vs Scientific Method
• Search vs Research
• Research vs Problem Solving
• Social Research vs Scientific Research
• Case Study vs Ethnography
• Essay vs Research Paper
• Audit vs Research
• Research Problem vs Research Question
• Research vs Evaluation
• Research Methods vs Research Design
• Research Article vs Research Paper
• Case Study vs Phenomenology