alfred hershey and martha chase experiment conclusion

The Hershey-Chase Experiments (1952), by Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase

In 1951 and 1952, Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase conducted a series of experiments at the Carnegie Institute of Washington in Cold Spring Harbor, New York, that verified genes were made of deoxyribonucleic acid, or DNA. Hershey and Chase performed their experiments, later named the Hershey-Chase experiments, on viruses that infect bacteria, also called bacteriophages. The experiments followed decades of scientists’ skepticism about whether genetic material was composed of protein or DNA. The most well-known Hershey-Chase experiment, called the Waring Blender experiment, provided concrete evidence that genes were made of DNA. The Hershey-Chase experiments settled the long-standing debate about the composition of genes, thereby allowing scientists to investigate the molecular mechanisms by which genes function in organisms.

In the early twentieth century, scientists debated whether genes were made of DNA or protein. Genes control how organisms grow and develop and are the material basis for organisms’ ability to inherit traits like eye color or fur color from their parents. By 1900, scientists had identified the complete chemical composition, or building blocks, of DNA. They had also verified that all cells contained DNA, though DNA’s function remained ambiguous. Up until the 1940s, some scientists accepted the idea that genes were not made of DNA. Instead, those scientists supported the idea that DNA was a molecule that maintained cell structure. Scientists supported that idea in part because of a hypothesis called the tetranucleotide hypothesis. Phoebus Levene, a researcher at the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research in New York City, New York, proposed the tetranucleotide hypothesis for DNA in 1933. According to Levene and other proponents of the hypothesis, DNA consisted of repeating sets of four different building blocks, called nucleotides. Some scientists concluded that a repeating sequence of nucleotides in DNA limited potential for variability. Those scientists considered variability necessary for DNA to function as genetic material. In other words, genes needed to have the capacity for enough variation to account for the different traits scientists observe in organisms. Conversely, scientists found that proteins had many more building blocks and therefore more possible arrangements than DNA. From that, some scientists claimed that genes must have been made of protein, not DNA.

The Hershey-Chase experiments were not the first studies to oppose the prevailing theory in the early 1900s that genetic material was composed of proteins. In 1944, nearly a decade before Hershey and Chase’s work, scientists published sound evidence that genes were made of DNA rather than protein. Starting in 1935, Oswald Avery, another researcher at the Rockefeller Institute, with his research associates Colin MacLeod and Maclyn McCarty, performed experiments that showed that DNA facilitated a genetic phenomenon in bacteria called bacterial transformation. Bacterial transformation is the process by which a bacterium can get and use new genetic material from its surroundings. During bacterial transformation, a non-disease-causing bacterium can transform into disease-causing bacteria if the non-disease-causing bacteria is exposed to a disease-causing bacteria. Transformation can occur even if the disease-causing-strain is dead, implying that bacterial transformation happens when the non-disease-causing bacteria inherits genetic material from the disease-causing bacteria. Avery and his colleagues found that the inherited factor that caused bacterial transformation contained DNA. However, Avery’s group did not discount the possibility that some non-DNA component in their sample caused bacterial transformation, rather than the DNA itself. Because of that, many scientists maintained the idea that proteins must govern the genetic phenomenon of bacterial transformation.

Starting in 1951, Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase conducted a series of experiments, later called the Hershey-Chase experiments, that verified the findings of Avery and his colleagues. Hershey was a researcher who studied viruses at the Carnegie Institution of Washington in Cold Spring Harbor, New York. He studied viruses that infect bacteria, also called bacteriophages, or phages. Chase became Hershey’s research technician in 1950.

In their experiments, Hershey and Chase analyzed what happened when phages infect bacteria. By the 1950s, scientists had evidence for how phages infected bacteria. They found that when phages infect a host bacterium, the phages first attach themselves to the outside of the bacterium. Then, a piece of the phage enters the bacterium and subsequently replicates itself inside the cell. After many replications, the phage causes the bacterium to lyse, or burst, thereby killing the host bacteria. Scientists classified the replicating piece as genetic material. Scientists also found that phages contained two classes of biological molecules: DNA and protein. Hershey and Chase sought to determine if the replicating piece of phages that entered bacteria during infection, the genetic parts, were solely DNA.

To perform their experiments, Hershey and Chase utilized a technique called radioactive isotope labeling. Chemical elements can exist in different structural forms called isotopes. Isotopes of the same element are nearly identical, but scientists can distinguish between them by experimental means. One way to differentiate between chemical elements with different isotopes is by analyzing their radiation. Some isotopes are less stable than others and give off radioactive signals that scientists can detect. Hershey and Chase marked phages by incorporating radioactive isotopes of phosphorus and sulfur in those phages. They allowed some phages to replicate by infecting bacteria, specifically Escherichia coli , or E. Coli , that scientists had grown in radioactive sulfur. The researchers let other phages infect and replicate in E. Coli that scientists had grown in radioactive phosphorus. DNA contains phosphorus, but not sulfur, whereas protein contains sulfur, but not phosphorus. Therefore, when Hershey and Chase marked phages with radioactive isotopes of those elements, they placed separate, distinguishable tags on the protein and DNA parts of the phages.

The first Hershey-Chase experiment aimed to confirm previous experimental findings that the DNA and protein components of phages were separable. In 1950, Thomas Anderson at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, showed that phages consisted of a protein shell, or coat, with DNA inside the shell. Anderson found that the phages could release their DNA and leave behind what he called a protein ghost. Hershey and Chase replicated Anderson’s experimental results using their radioactive isotope labeling method. Hershey and Chase were able to separate the phages into radioactive sulfur-containing protein ghosts and radioactive phosphorus-containing DNA. They found that the radioactive sulfur protein ghosts could attach to bacterial membranes while the radioactive phosphorus DNA could not. Hershey and Chase also tested if enzymes, molecules that facilitate chemical reactions in cells, could degrade DNA. They found that enzymes did not degrade the DNA of intact phages, but did degrade the DNA of separated phages. Those results indicated that in the intact phages, the protein coat surrounded the DNA and protected the DNA from degradation.

In another Hershey-Chase experiment, Hershey and Chase showed that when certain phages infected E. Coli , the phages injected their DNA into the host bacterium. In 1951, Roger Herriot at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, demonstrated that after phages infected bacteria, their protein ghosts remained attached to the outside of the bacterial cells while their DNA was released elsewhere. Hershey and Chase aimed to show where the phage DNA went when it exited the protein coat and entered the bacteria. The researchers allowed radioactive phosphorus-labeled phages to attach to bacterial cell membranes in a liquid solution and infect the bacteria. Using a centrifuge, Hershey and Chase rapidly spun the samples to separate the bacterial cells from the surrounding solution. After centrifugation, they found that most of the radioactive phosphorus was detected in the cells rather than in the surrounding solution, meaning that the phage DNA must have entered the cells when the phages infected the bacteria.

The most well-known Hershey-Chase experiment was the final experiment, also called the Waring Blender experiment, through which Hershey and Chase showed that phages only injected their DNA into host bacteria, and that the DNA served as the replicating genetic element of phages. In the previous experiment, Hershey and Chase found evidence that phages injected their DNA into host bacteria. In the Waring Blender experiment, the scientists found that the phages did not inject any part of their protein coats in the host bacteria and the protein coats remained outside the bacteria, adhered to the bacterial membranes. For their experiment, Hershey and Chase prepared two samples of infected E. Coli . They infected one sample with radioactive phosphorus-labeled phages, and the other sample with radioactive sulfur-labeled phages. Then, they stirred each sample in a Waring Blender, which was a conventional kitchen blender. They used a blender because centrifuges spun too fast and would destroy the bacterial cells. The shearing forces of the blender removed the phage particles that adhered to the bacterial membranes, but preserved the integrity of the cells and most of the phage material that entered the cell. In the phosphorus-labeled sample that marked DNA but not protein, the blender removed forty percent of the labeled particles. In the sulfur-labeled sample that marked protein but not DNA, the blender removed eighty percent of the labeled particles. Those results indicated that the blender removed much more of the protein parts of the phage than the DNA parts, suggesting that the protein likely remained adhered to the outside of the cell during infection. Since the protein remained outside the cell, it could not be the replicating genetic material.

The Waring Blender only removed eighty percent of the radioactive sulfur-labeled phage, so Hershey and Chase could not account for twenty percent of the phage protein material. To show that the missing twenty percent of the phage protein did not enter the bacterial cells and replicate, the researchers infected E. Coli with radioactive sulfur-labeled phage again so that only the protein parts of the phage were labeled. They prepared two samples. For one sample, Hershey and Chase stirred the cells in the blender to remove the phage particles adhered to the outer bacterial membrane. After stirring, they allowed the phages to cause the cells to lyse, releasing newly replicated phages. For the second sample, Hershey and Chase did not stir the cells in the blender and measured the resulting replicated phages after the bacterial cells lysed. In the blender-stirred sample, less than one percent of the replicated phages contained the radioactive sulfur label. However, in the sample that Hershey and Chase did not stir in the blender, almost ten percent of the phages contained the radioactive sulfur label. The blender maintains any phage material that entered the bacterial cell. If protein was genetic material that entered the cell and replicated, then Hershey and Chase would have found more sulfur-labeled protein in the sample they stirred with the blender. The sample that they did not stir had more of the sulfur-labeled protein because the protein coats remained on the outside of the cell. Hershey and Chase concluded that protein was not genetic material, and that DNA was genetic material.

Unlike Avery’s experiments on bacterial transformations, the Hershey-Chase experiments were more widely and immediately accepted among scientists. The Hershey-Chase experiments mostly ended scientists’ suspicions that genes were made of protein rather than DNA. However, historians have questioned the conclusiveness of the Hershey-Chase experiments. In all the Waring Blender experiments, some protein and DNA material remained unaccounted for. Even in the final experiment, when Hershey and Chase allowed the bacterial cells to lyse after stirring in the blender, the scientists still recovered a small amount of protein, implying that some protein entered the cells during infection. Furthermore, the amount of contaminating protein in the Hershey-Chase Experiments exceeded the amount of contaminating protein that Avery’s group found in their experiments.

Historians of science have studied why scientists more readily accepted the Hershey-Chase experiments than Avery’s experiments. Science historian Frederic Lawrence Holmes writes that scientists more readily accepted the results of the Hershey-Chase experiments because Hershey communicated directly with skeptical scientists. Hershey sent letters to his colleagues in which he detailed the experimental findings of the Hershey-Chase experiments. Another historian of science, Michel Morange, writes that the Hershey-Chase experiments were performed at a time when scientists were ready to accept that genetic material could be DNA. Avery’s group conducted their experiments when the tetranucleotide hypothesis was popular and few scientists held that genes contained DNA. According to Morange, because Hershey and Chase conducted their experiments years later, scientists had gathered more experimental evidence and were willing to seriously consider that genes contained DNA.

In 1953, James Watson and Francis Crick, two scientists at the University of Cambridge in Cambridge, England, modeled the three-dimensional structure of DNA and demonstrated how DNA might function as genetic material. In 1969, Hershey shared the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine with two other scientists, Max Delbrück and Salvador Luria, partly for his work on the Hershey-Chase experiments.

• Avery, Oswald, Colin MacLeod, and Maclyn McCarty. "Studies on the Chemical Nature of the Substance Inducing Transformation of Pneumococcal Types." The Journal of Experimental Medicine 79 (1944): 137–58.
• Fry, Michael. “Chapter 4 – Hershey and Chase Clinched the role of DNA as Genetic Material: Phage Studies Propelled the Birth of Molecular Biology.” In Landmark Experiments in Molecular Biology , 111–42. Cambridge: Academic Press, 2016.
• Hershey, Alfred D., and Martha Chase. “Independent Functions of Viral Protein and Nucleic Acid in Growth of Bacteriophage” The Journal of General Physiology 36 (1952): 39–56.
• Holmes, Frederic L. Meselson, Stahl, and the Replication of DNA: A History of “The Most Beautiful Experiment in Biology.” New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2001.
• Hopson, Janet L., and Norman K. Wessells. Essentials of Biology . New York: McGraw-Hill, 1990.
• Judson, Horace Freeland. The Eighth Day of Creation . Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1996.
• Morange, Michel. A History of Molecular Biology . Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press, 1998.
• Olby, Robert Cecil. The Path to the Double Helix: The Discovery of DNA . Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1974.
• Stahl, Franklin W., and Alfred D. Hershey. We Can Sleep Later: Alfred D. Hershey and the Origins of Molecular Biology . Woodbury: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2000.

How to cite

Articles rights and graphics.

Copyright Arizona Board of Regents Licensed as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)  

Last modified

Share this page.

• Introduction to Genomics
• Educational Resources
• Policy Issues in Genomics
• The Human Genome Project
• Funding Opportunities
• Funded Programs & Projects
• Division and Program Directors
• Scientific Program Analysts
• Contacts by Research Area
• News & Events
• Research Areas
• Research Investigators
• Research Projects
• Clinical Research
• Data Tools & Resources
• Genomics & Medicine
• Family Health History
• For Patients & Families
• For Health Professionals
• Jobs at NHGRI
• Training at NHGRI
• Funding for Research Training
• Professional Development Programs
• NHGRI Culture
• Social Media
• Broadcast Media
• Image Gallery
• Press Resources
• Organization
• NHGRI Director
• Mission and Vision
• Policies and Guidance
• Institute Advisors
• Strategic Vision
• Leadership Initiatives
• Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
• Partner with NHGRI
• Staff Search

1952: Genes are Made of DNA

Their experiment provided strong support for the idea that genes are made of DNA. They firmly restated the conclusion that Avery, et al. had more tentatively proposed in 1944.

Electron microscope images showed that a bacterial virus - bacteriophage T4 - attaches to a bacterium to infect it. Hershey and Chase figured that the virus transferred genetic material into the bacterium to direct the production of more virus.

They knew that bacteriophage T4 was made of protein and DNA. They also knew that proteins contain sulfur atoms but no phosphorus, while DNA contains a great deal of phosphorus and no sulfur. They used radioactive sulfur and phosphorus to label and, so, distinguish viral proteins from viral DNA. After allowing labeled viruses to infect bacteria, they observed that the radioactive phosphorus enters the bacteria while the radioactive sulfur always remains outside.

More Information

Hershey, A.D., Chase M., 1952. Independent functions of viral protein and nucleic acid in growth of bacteriophage. J. Gen. Physiol, 36:39-56. 1952. [ PubMed ]

« Previous Event | Next Event »

Last updated: April 23, 2013

Hershey and Chase Experiment

Hershey and Chase experiment give practical evidence in the year 1952 of DNA as genetic material using radioactive bacteriophage . Griffith also explained the transformation in bacteria and concluded that the protein factor imparts virulence to the rough strain, but it was not proved to be genetic material.

Avery , Macleod and McCarthy further studied the Griffith experiment and concluded that the DNA was the genetic material responsible for transforming the avirulent rough strain to the virulent strain. To resolve the query of genetic material, many researchers were engaged to know whether the cause of inheritance is protein or DNA.

Many assessments then led to the discovery of “ DNA ” as genetic material or the cause of inheritance . One of the best experiments that provide DNA evidence as genetic material is the “ Hershey and Chase experiment ”. We will study the definition, steps (radioactive labelling, infection, blending and centrifugation) and observation of the Hershey and Chase experiment in this context.

Content: Hershey and Chase Experiment

Radioactive labelling of bacteriophage, centrifugation, observation, definition of hershey and chase experiment.

Hershey and Chase’s experiment has demonstrated the DNA is the genetic material where they have taken the radioactive T2-bacteriophage (Viruses that infect E.coli bacteria). T2-bacteriophage or Enterobacteria phage T2 belongs to the Group-I bacteriophage.

Video: Hershey and Chase Experiment

Hershey and Chase Experiment Steps

Hershey and Chase gave full evidence of the DNA being a genetic material by their experiments. To perform the experiment, Hershey and Chase have taken T-2 bacteriophages (invaders of E.coli bacteria). The experiment includes the following steps:

Hershey and Chase have grown T-2 bacteriophages in the two batches. In batch-1, we need to grow the bacteriophages in the medium containing radioactive sulphur (S 35 ) and radioactive phosphorus (P 32 )  in batch-2. After incubation, we could see that the radioactive sulphur (S 35 ) will tag the phage protein. The radioactive phosphorus (P 32 ) will tag the phage DNA.

After radioactive labelling of the phage DNA and protein, Hershey and Chase infected the bacteria, i.e. E.coli by using the radioactively labelled T-2 phage. In batch-1, T-2 phage tagged with S 35 and in batch-2 T-2 phage labelled with P 32 were allowed to infect the bacterial cells of E.coli .

After the attachment of  T-2 bacteriophage to the E.coli , the phage DNA will enter the cytoplasm of E.coli . The phage DNA will take up the host cell machinery. Degradation of the bacterial genome occurs by the T2-phages where they use the ribosomes to form structural proteins of the capsid, tail fibres, base plate etc.

At the time of blending or agitation, the bacterial cells are agitated to remove the viral coats . As a result of the agitation, we get a solution containing bacterial cells and viral particles like capsid, tail fibres, base plate, DNA etc.

After the centrifugation, we could observe the results to identify the heritable factor . The phage DNA labelled with P 32  will transfer the radioactivity in the host cell. Thus, the radioactive P 32  enters a bacterial cell and exists in the form of “Pellets”. The phage protein tagged with S 35 will not transfer its radioactivity in the host cell. As a result, radioactive S 35 will appear in the form of  “Supernatant” in the solution.

The P 32 labelled phage DNA will transfer its radioactivity to the host cell DNA, while S 35 labelled phage protein will not do so. The P 32 labelled phage DNA will remain inside the E.coli cell even after blending and centrifugation. According to the Hershey and Chase experiment, we can conclude that the DNA is the genetic material because the P 32 tagged T2-phage DNA will transfer the radioactivity to the host cell ( E.coli ) not the S 35 labelled T2-phage protein.

Related Topics:

• Citrus Canker Disease
• Microbial Food Spoilage
• Acetic Acid Production
• Activated Sludge Treatment

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Start typing and press enter to search

• Biology Article
• Dna Genetic Material

DNA As Genetic Material - Hershey And Chase Experiment

Even though researchers discovered that the factor responsible for the inheritance of traits comes from within the organisms; they failed to identify the hereditary material. The chromosomal components were isolated but the material which is responsible for inheritance remained unanswered. Griffith’s experiment was a stepping stone for the discovery of genetic material. It took a long time for the acceptance of DNA as genetic material. Let’s go through the discovery of DNA as genetic material.

Experiments of Hershey and Chase

We know about Griffith’s experiment and experiments that followed to discover the hereditary material in organisms. Based on Griffith’s experiment, Avery and his team isolated DNA and proved DNA to be the genetic material. But it was not accepted by all until Hershey and Chase published their experimental results.

In 1952, Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase took an effort to find the genetic material in organisms.  Their experiments led to an unequivocal proof to DNA as genetic material. Bacteriophages (viruses that affect bacteria) were the key element for Hershey and Chase experiment.

The virus doesn’t have their own mechanism of reproduction but they depend on a host for the same. Once they attach to the host cell, their genetic material is transferred to the host. Here in case of bacteriophages, bacteria are their host. The infected bacteria are manipulated by the bacteriophages such that bacterial cells start to replicate the viral genetic material. Hershey and Chase conducted an experiment to discover whether it was protein or DNA that acted as the genetic material that entered the bacteria.

DNA as Genetic Material

Experiment: The experiment began with the culturing of viruses in two types of medium. One set of viruses (A) was cultured in a medium of radioactive phosphorus whereas another set (B) was cultured in a medium of radioactive sulfur. They observed that the first set of viruses (A) consisted of radioactive DNA but not radioactive proteins . This is because DNA is a phosphorus-based compound while protein is not. The latter set of viruses (B) consisted of radioactive protein but not radioactive DNA.

The host for infection was E.coli bacteria. The viruses were allowed to infect bacteria by removing the viral coats through a number of blending and centrifugation.

Observation:  E.coli bacteria which were infected by radioactive DNA viruses (A) were radioactive but the ones that were infected by radioactive protein viruses (B) were non-radioactive.

Conclusion: Resultant radioactive and non-radioactive bacteria infer that the viruses that had radioactive DNA transferred their DNA to the bacteria but viruses that had radioactive protein didn’t get transferred to the bacteria. Hence, DNA is the genetic material and not the protein.

For more video lessons on DNA as genetic material, visit  BYJU’S.

Put your understanding of this concept to test by answering a few MCQs. Click ‘Start Quiz’ to begin!

Select the correct answer and click on the “Finish” button Check your score and answers at the end of the quiz

Visit BYJU’S for all Biology related queries and study materials

Your result is as below

Request OTP on Voice Call

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Your Mobile number and Email id will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Post My Comment

Byju’s is best

Register with BYJU'S & Download Free PDFs

Register with byju's & watch live videos.

Concept 18 Bacteria and viruses have DNA too.

Joshua Lederberg was only 20 when he proposed the experiment in bacterial conjugation. The experiment worked almost on the first try. Within six weeks, he had enough results to prove that bacteria mated.

Why would bacteria need to mate?

Funded by --> The Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation © 2002 - 2011, DNA Learning Center , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory . All rights reserved.

• CLASSICAL GENETICS

• GENETIC ORGANIZATION AND CONTROL

• Field Trips
• Middle School Labs
• High School Labs
• Ötzi the Iceman Field Trips
• CUNY City Tech Field Trips
• School Membership Program
• Open Events
• School Break Bio!
• Saturday DNA!
• DNALC LI Exhibition
• DNALC NYC Exhibition
• Meet a Scientist Series
• Science Camps
• Student Research
• Citizen Science
• Educator Training

Websites & Apps

• Apps & Textbooks

3D Animations

• Biology Animations
• Students Talk Science
• Search All Media
• About DNALC
• Dolan DNA Learning Center
• Harlem DNA Lab
• DNALC NYC at CityTech
• Regeneron DNALC
• Licensed Centers
• Collaborations
• History: Annual Reports
• Publications
• Staff & Employment
• Contact & Directions

Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase, 1952

• Description

Bacteria and viruses have DNA too.

martha chase,alfred hershey,alfred day hershey

• Source: DNALC.DNAi

Related Content

16406. gallery 18: alfred hershey and martha chase, 1953.

Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase at Cold Spring Harbor, 1953.

• Source: DNAFTB

16411. Gallery 18: Alfred Hershey, 1960

Alfred Hershey working in the lab, 1960.

16419. Biography 18: Alfred Day Hershey (1908-1997)

Alfred Hershey was a phage geneticist who, with his research assistant, Martha Chase, did one of the most famous experiments in molecular biology. The "blender" experiment proved that DNA carried genetic information.

16409. Gallery 18: Alfred Hershey, 1969

Alfred Hershey receiving the 1969 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.

16410. Gallery 18: Alfred Hershey and his son, 1969

Alfred Hershey and his son, Peter, at the Nobel Prize ceremonies.

16597. Gallery 27: Alfred Hershey and Seymour Benzer, 1953

Alfred Hershey and Seymour Benzer at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1953 Symposium.

16417. Video 18: Al Hershey, clip 1

In this interview from 1991, Al Hershey describes the experimental approach used in the famous "blender experiment."

16404. Gallery 18: E. B. Lewis, C. C. Lindegren, Alfred Hershey and Joshua Lederberg, 1951

1951 Cold Spring Harbor Symposium, (L-R): E. B. Lewis, C. C. Lindegren, Alfred Hershey and Joshua Lederberg.

16407. Gallery 18: Martha Epstein Chase

Martha Epstein Chase.

16395. Animation18: Bacteria and viruses have DNA too.

Joshua Lederberg worked with bacterial genetics while Alfred Hershey showed that DNA is responsible for the reproduction of new viruses in a cell.

• Source: DNALC.DNAFTB

• Biotechnology
• Biochemistry
• Microbiology
• Cell Biology
• Cell Signaling
• Diversity in Life Form
• Molecular Biology

DNA as Genetic Material - Hershey And Chase Experiment

The Hershey and Chase Experiment , conducted in 1952 by Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase, demonstrated that DNA contains genetic information. They accomplished this by investigating viruses that infect bacteria, known as bacteriophages. In these tests, scientists labelled the virus’s DNA with a radioactive marker while labelling the protein coat independently with another marker.

When the viruses infected bacteria, researchers discovered that only the DNA identifier, not the protein marker, was passed along to the next generation of viruses. This helped to demonstrate that DNA, not protein, is the molecule that conveys genetic instructions. We will read about the Hershey and Chase Experiment in detail in this article.

Table of Content

Hershey and Chase Experiment

Dna as genetic material, what is the pulse and chase experiment, conclusion -dna as genetic material: hershey and chase experiment.

• FAQs on DNA As Genetic Material – Hershey And Chase Experiment

In 1952, Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase investigated bacteriophage, a virus that destroys bacteria . Their research focused on T2 bacteriophage that infects the bacterium Escherichia coli (E. coli). Their goal was to determine whether the T2 phage’s genetic instructions or information required for life, were stored in its DNA or protein coat. They wanted to show that the DNA, not the protein , contained this important genetic information.

There were three steps in the experiment:

• Centrifugation

Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase used two forms of radioactive material, phosphorus-32 (32P) and sulfur-35 (35S), to designate the bacteriophages differently. Phosphorus is a component of DNA, the genetic material, whereas sulphur is present in proteins but not DNA.

They inserted these radioactive isotopes into the bacteriophages DNA (genetic material) and protein coat (capsid) separately. This enabled them to determine which parts of the virus entered the bacterial cell during infection. They then allowed the labelled viruses to infect E. coli bacterial cells.

Following a brief time of infection, they mixed the liquid to separate the viral protein coatings from the bacteria. This blending phase ensured that any viral proteins that were not bound to bacterial cells were eliminated. They next centrifuged the mixture, causing the heavier bacterial cells to sink at the bottom of the tube while the lighter viral protein coatings (if present) remained in the liquid above, known as the supernatant.

The results demonstrated that bacterial cells infected with phages labelled with phosphorus-32 (32P) exhibited radioactivity. This suggested that the phages’ DNA entered the cells during infection. In contrast, bacterial cells infected with phages labelled with sulfur-35 (35S) exhibited little to no radioactivity, indicating that the phages’ protein coat (also known as capsid) did not enter the cells.

Based on these findings, Hershey and Chase concluded that DNA, rather than protein, serves as the genetic material transmitting bacteriophages’ hereditary information. This experiment offered solid proof that DNA is the chemical responsible for conveying genetic information in living beings.

Scientists discovered that DNA is the primary factor in defining the characteristics of most living organisms . However, some viruses use RNA instead. So, for something to be genetic material, it must:

• Be able to create clones of itself (self replicable).
• Be stable structurally and chemicaly.
• Allow for mutations, which can lead to evolution.
• Be able to pass on traits according to Mendel’s inheritance principles.

Most other compounds, such as proteins, carbohydrates , and lipids, did not meet the previously listed criteria. While RNA could meet those requirements, DNA was favoured over RNA for genetic material for a number of reasons:

• DNA has more structural stability than RNA.
• DNA has higher chemical stability than RNA.
• DNA has a double-stranded structure that allows it to effectively repair replication faults.
• RNA is required for protein production because DNA cannot directly code for them.

Approximate content of DNA in few organisms is given below:

Pulse-Chase Analysis is similar to a time-lapse camera for investigating what happens inside cells . In this procedure, cells are first exposed to a labelled chemical (the “pulse”) that identifies certain molecules. Then they are given an unlabeled chemical (the “chase”) to observe what occurs. This allows scientists to track how molecules migrate and change over time.

Researchers have utilised this method to analyse a variety of proteins, including protein kinase C and ubiquitin, as well as to better understand processes such as Okazaki fragment production during DNA replication. For example, George Palade used pulse-chase with radioactive amino acids to study how cells release chemicals.

Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase conducted to confirm DNA as the genetic substance. The Hershey-Chase investigations was crucial then as at that time many scientists believed that proteins contained genetic information rather than DNA. Hershey and Chase discovered that when viruses called bacteriophages infect bacteria, a small amount of their protein enters the bacterial cell. This suggested that DNA, not protein, was responsible for carrying genetic instructions. These findings, coupled with previous and subsequent discoveries, strongly showed that DNA was the genetic material. Later they received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their contributions to genetics.

Also Read: Search For Genetic Material – Molecular Basis Of Inheritance DNA Replication Difference Between Gene and DNA

FAQs on DNA as Genetic Material – Hershey And Chase Experiment

What are the 3 steps of hershey and chase experiment.

Hershey and Chase carried their experiment in three steps : infection, blending, centrifugation.

What was the Hershey and Chase Experiment Class 12?

The Hershey and Chase experiment, conducted in 1952 by Martha Chase and Alfred Hershey, demonstrated that DNA, rather than protein, is the genetic material of viruses. They used bacteriophages to track the transmission of genetic information.

How did the Hershey and Chase Experiment Work?

In the experiment, bacteriophages were labeled with radioactive isotopes: sulfur-35 for proteins and phosphorus-32 for DNA. The phages were allowed to infect bacterial cells. After infection, the phage protein coats were removed by agitating the mixture in a blender, separating them from the bacterial cells.

What is the Principle of Hershey and Chase Experiment?

Hershey and Chase experiment proving DNA as the genetic material was based on the principle Transduction which is the process by which DNA is transferred from one bacterium to another by a virus.

Why was the Hershey and Chase Experiment Significant?

The Hershey and Chase experiment provided crucial evidence supporting the idea that DNA carries genetic information. This discovery was instrumental in shaping our understanding of genetics and laid the foundation for subsequent research in molecular biology, including the elucidation of the structure of DNA by Watson and Crick.

Is DNA the only Genetic Material?

There are three types of genetic materials: DNA, RNA, and genes.

Why was E.coli used in Hershey and Chase Experiment?

E. coli was used in the Hershey and Chase Experiment because it is easily grown and reproduces quickly, making it ideal for genetic research.

What Virus did Chase and Hershey Study?

Chase and Hershey studied the T2 bacteriophage virus in their experiment.

What was the Radioactive in the Hershey and Chase Experiment?

They used radioactive sulfur (S35) to label protein and radioactive phosphorus (P32) to label DNA.

What was the Conclusion of Hershey and Chase Experiment?

The conclusion of Hershey and Chase experiment was that DNA and not protein is the genetic material passed from viruses to bacteria.

How did Hershey and Chase Modify the Virus?

Hershey and Chase modified the virus by labeling its DNA with radioactive phosphorus to track its transmission into bacterial cells.

Similar Reads

• School Biology
• School Learning

Please Login to comment...

• How to Underline in Discord
• How to Block Someone on Discord
• How to Report Someone on Discord
• How to add Bots to Discord Servers
• GeeksforGeeks Practice - Leading Online Coding Platform

Improve your Coding Skills with Practice

What kind of Experience do you want to share?

Talk to our experts

1800-120-456-456

Describe the Hershey and Chase experiment. Write the conclusion drawn by the scientists after their experiment.

• Question Answer
• Describe the Hershey and Chase...

Repeaters Course for NEET 2022 - 23