research paper on contemporary literature

Institutions:

    print & online $262

    online only $231

Individuals:

    print & online $79

    online only $66

Non U.S. Postage

Airmail: add $48/yr.

Canadian Subscribers:
add 5% GST.

Executive Editor: Timothy Yu,
Editors for American Fiction: Steven Belletto, ; Michael LeMahieu,
Editor for British and Anglophone Fiction: David James,
Editor for Poetry: Evie Shockley,
ISSN: 0010-7484, e-ISSN: 1548-9949
Published four times per year

publishes scholarly essays on contemporary writing in English, interviews with established and emerging authors, and reviews of recent critical books in the field. The journal welcomes articles on multiple genres, including poetry, the novel, drama, creative nonfiction, new media and digital literature, and graphic narrative. published the first articles on Thomas Pynchon and Susan Howe and the first interviews with Margaret Drabble and Don DeLillo; it also helped to introduce Kazuo Ishiguro, Eavan Boland, and J. M. Coetzee to American readers. As a forum for discussing issues animating the range of contemporary literary studies, features the full diversity of critical practices. The editors seek articles that frame their analysis of texts within larger literary historical, theoretical, or cultural debates.

Available on Project MUSE and JSTOR

Back Issues

Some back issues of Contemporary Literature are available online as part of a paid subscription. Anyone may view TOC's, abstracts, and a sample issue for free at cl.uwpress.org . Access may also be purchased on a limited term basis for a specific article or issue.

Print back issues may be purchased from the University of Wisconsin Press here .

Single articles may be purchased online at cl.uwpress.org or through the JSTOR archive . Print copies of single articles may be ordered here .

• Call For Papers
• Advanced search

Advanced Search

Latest Articles

• Find this author on Google Scholar
• Find this author on PubMed
• Search for this author on this site
• You have access Restricted access Contributors Contemporary Literature, August 2024, 64 (3) 409; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/cl.64.3.409
• You have access Restricted access Erratum Contemporary Literature, August 2024, 64 (3) vi; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/cl.64.3.vi

Department of English

Recent PhD Dissertations

Terekhov, Jessica (September 2022) -- "On Wit in Relation to Self-Division"

Selinger, Liora (September 2022) -- "Romanticism, Childhood, and the Poetics of Explanation"

Lockhart, Isabel (September 2022) -- "Storytelling and the Subsurface: Indigenous Fiction, Extraction, and the Energetic Present"

Ashe, Nathan (April 2022) – "Narrative Energy: Physics and the Scientific Real in Victorian Literature”

Bartley, Scott H. (April 2022) – “Watch it closely: The Poetry and Poetics of Aesthetic Focus in The New Criticism and Middle Generation”

Mctar, Ali (November 2021) – “Fallen Father: John Milton, Antinomianism, and the Case Against Adam”

Chow, Janet (September 2021) – “Securing the Crisis: Race and the Poetics of Risk”

Thorpe, Katherine (September 2021) – “Protean Figures: Personified Abstractions from Milton’s Allegory to Wordsworth’s Psychology of the Poet”

Minnen, Jennifer (September 2021) – “The Second Science: Feminist Natural Inquiry in Nineteenth-Century British Literature”

Starkowski, Kristen (September 2021) – “Doorstep Moments: Close Encounters with Minor Characters in the Victorian Novel”

Rickard, Matthew (September 2021) – “Probability: A Literary History, 1479-1700”

Crandell, Catie (September 2021) – “Inkblot Mirrors: On the Metareferential Mode and 19th Century British Literature”

Clayton, J.Thomas (September 2021) – “The Reformation of Indifference: Adiaphora, Toleration, and English Literature in the Seventeenth Century”

Goldberg, Reuven L. (May 2021) – “I Changed My Sex! Pedagogy and the Trans Narrative”

Soong, Jennifer (May 2021) – “Poetic Forgetting”

Edmonds, Brittney M. (April 2021) – “Who’s Laughing Now? Black Affective Play and Formalist Innovation in Twenty-First Century black Literary Satire”

Azariah-Kribbs, Colin (April 2021) – “Mere Curiosity: Knowledge, Desire, and Peril in the British and Irish Gothic Novel, 1796-1820”

Pope, Stephanie (January 2021) – “Rethinking Renaissance Symbolism: Material Culture, Visual Signs, and Failure in Early Modern Literature, 1587-1644”

Kumar, Matthew (September 2020) – “The Poetics of Space and Sensation in Scotland and Kenya”

Bain, Kimberly (September 2020) – “On Black Breath”

Eisenberg, Mollie (September 2020) – “The Case of the Self-Conscious Detective Novel: Modernism, Metafiction, and the Terms of Literary Value”

Hori, Julia M. (September 2020) – “Restoring Empire: British Imperial Nostalgia, Colonial Space, and Violence since WWII”

Reade, Orlando (June 2020) – “Being a Lover of the World: Lyric Poetry and Political Disaffection after the English Civil War”

Mahoney, Cate (June 2020) – “Go on Your Nerve: Confidence in American Poetry, 1860-1960”

Ritger, Matthew (April 2020) – “Objects of Correction:  Literature and the Birth of Modern Punishment”

VanSant, Cameron (April 2020) – “Novel Subjects:  Nineteenth-Century Fiction and the Transformation of British Subjecthood”

Lennington, David (November 2019) – “Anglo-Saxon and Arabic Identity in the Early Middle Ages”

Marraccini, Miranda (September 2019) – “Feminist Types: Reading the Victoria Press”

Harlow, Lucy (June 2019) – “The Discomposed Mind”

Williamson, Andrew (June 2019) – “Nothing to Say:  Silence in Modernist American Poetry”

Adair, Carl (April 2019) – “Faithful Readings: Religion, Hermeneutics, and the Habits of Criticism”

Rogers, Hope (April 2019) – “Good Girls: Female Agency and Convention in the Nineteenth-Century British Novel”

Green, Elspeth (January 2019) – “Popular Science and Modernist Poetry”

Braun, Daniel (January 2019) – Kinds of Wrong: The Liberalization of Modern Poetry 1910-1960”

Rosen, Rebecca (November 2018) – “Making the body Speak: Anatomy, Autopsy and Testimony in Early America, 1639-1790”

Blank, Daniel (November 2018) – Shakespeare and the Spectacle of University Drama”

Case, Sarah (September 2018) – Increase of Issue: Poetry and Succession in Elizabethan England”

Kucik, Emanuela  (June 2018) – “Black Genocides and the Visibility Paradox in Post-Holocaust African American and African Literature”

Quinn, Megan  (June 2018) – “The Sensation of Language: Jane Austen, William Wordsworth, Mary Shelley”

McCarthy, Jesse D.  (June 2018) – “The Blue Period: Black Writing in the Early Cold War, 1945-1965

Johnson, Colette E.  (June 2018) – “The Foibles of Play: Three Case Studies on Play in the Interwar Years”

Gingrich, Brian P.  (June 2018) – “The Pace of Modern Fiction: A History of Narrative Movement in Modernity”

Marcus, Sara R.  (June 2018) – “Political Disappointment: A Partial History of a Feeling”

Parry, Rosalind A.  (April 2018) – “Remaking Nineteenth-Century Novels for the Twentieth Century”

Gibbons, Zoe  (January 2018) – “From Time to Time:  Narratives of Temporality in Early Modern England, 1610-1670”

Padilla, Javier  (September 2017) – “Modernist Poetry and the Poetics of Temporality:  Between Modernity and Coloniality”

Alvarado, Carolina (June 2017) – "Pouring Eastward: Editing American Regionalism, 1890-1940"

Gunaratne, Anjuli (May 2017) – "Tragic Resistance: Decolonization and Disappearance in Postcolonial Literature"

Glover, Eric (May 2017) – "By and About:  An Antiracist History of the Musicals and the Antimusicals of Langston Hughes and Zora Neale Hurston"

Tuckman, Melissa (April 2017) – "Unnatural Feelings in Nineteenth-Century Poetry"

Eggan, Taylor (April 2017) – "The Ecological Uncanny: Estranging Literary Landscapes in Twentieth-Century Narrative Fiction"

Calver, Harriet (March 2017) – "Modern Fiction and Its Phantoms"

Gaubinger, Rachel (December 2016) – "Between Siblings: Form and Family in the Modern Novel"

Swartz, Kelly (December 2016) – "Maxims and the Mind: Sententiousness from Seventeenth-Century Science to the Eighteenth-Century Novel"

Robles, Francisco (June 2016) – “Migrant Modalities: Radical Democracy and Intersectional Praxis in American Literatures, 1923-1976”

Johnson, Daniel (June 2016) – “Visible Plots, Invisible Realms”

Bennett, Joshua (June 2016) – “Being Property Once Myself: In Pursuit of the Animal in 20th Century African American Literature”

Scranton, Roy (January 2016) – “The Trauma Hero and the Lost War: World War II, American Literature, and the Politics of Trauma, 1945-1975

Jacob, Priyanka (November 2015) – “Things That Linger: Secrets, Containers and Hoards in the Victorian Novel”

Evans, William (November 2015) – “The Fiction of Law in Shakespeare and Spenser”

Vasiliauskas, Emily (November 2015) – “Dead Letters: The Afterlife Before Religion”

Walker, Daniel (June 2015) – “Sociable Uncertainties: Literature and the Ethics of Indeterminacy in Eighteenth-Century Britain”

Reilly, Ariana (June 2015) – “Leave-Takings: Anti-Self-Consciousness and the Escapist Ends of the Victorian Marriage Plot”

Lerner, Ross (June 2015) – "Framing Fanaticism: Religion, Violence, and the Reformation Literature of Self-Annihilation”

Harrison, Matthew (June 2015) – "Tear Him for His Bad Verses: Poetic Value and Literary History in Early Modern England”

Krumholtz, Matthew (June 2015) – “Talking Points: American Dialogue in the Twentieth Century”

Dauber, Maayan (March 2015) – "The Pathos of Modernism: Henry James, Virginia Woolf, and Gertrude Stein (with a coda on J.M. Coetzee)”

Hostetter, Lyra (March 2015) – “Novel Errantry: An Annotated Edition of Horatio, of Holstein (1800)”

Sanford, Beatrice (January 2015) – “Love’s Perception: Nineteenth-Century Aesthetics of Attachment”

Chong, Kenneth (January 2015) – “Potential Theologies: Scholasticism and Middle English Literature”

Worsley, Amelia (September 2014) – “The Poetry of Loneliness from Romance to Romanticism”

Hurtado, Jules (June 2014) – “The Pornographer at the Crossroads: Sex, Realism and Experiment in the Contemporary English Novel”

Rutherford, James (June 2014) – "Irrational Actors: Literature and Logic in Early Modern England”

Wilde, Lisa (June 2014) – “English Numeracy and the Writing of New Worlds, 1543-1622”

Hyde, Emily (November 2013) – “A Way of Seeing: Modernism, Illustration, and Postcolonial Literature”

Ortiz, Ivan (September 2013) – “Romanticism and the Aesthetics of Modern Transport”

Aronowicz, Yaron (September 2013) – “Fascinated Moderns: The Attentions of Modern Fiction”

Wythoff, Grant (September 2013) – “Gadgetry: New Media and the Fictional Imagination”

Ramachandran, Anitha (September 2013) – "Recovering Global Women’s Travel Writings from the Modern Period: An Inquiry Into Genre and Narrative Agency”

Reuland, John (April 2013) – “The Self Unenclosed: A New Literary History of Pragmatism, 1890-1940”

Wasserman, Sarah (January 2013) – “Material Losses: Urban Ephemera in Contemporary American Literature and Culture”

Kastner, Tal (November 2012) – "The Boilerplate of Everything and the Ideal of Agreement in American Law and Literature"

Labella, John (October 2012) – "Lyric Hemisphere: Latin America in United States Poetry, 1927-1981"

Kindley, Evan (September 2012) – "Critics and Connoisseurs: Poet-Critics and the Administration of Modernism"

Smith, Ellen (September 2012) – "Writing Native: The Aboriginal in Australian Cultural Nationalism 1927-1945"

Werlin, Julianne (September 2012) – "The Impossible Probable: Modeling Utopia in Early Modern England"

Posmentier, Sonya (May 2012) – "Cultivation and Catastrophe:  Forms of Nature in Twentieth-Century Poetry of the Black Diaspora"

Alfano, Veronica (September 2011) – “The Lyric in Victorian Memory”

Foltz, Jonathan (September 2011) – “Modernism and the Narrative Cultures of Film”

Coghlan, J. Michelle (September 2011) – “Revolution’s Afterlife; The Paris Commune in American Cultural Memory, 1871-1933”

Christoff, Alicia (September 2011) – “Novel Feeling”

Shin, Jacqueline (August 2011) – “Picturing Repose: Between the Acts of British Modernism”

Ebrahim, Parween (August 2011) – “Outcasts and Inheritors: The Ishmael Ethos in American Culture, 1776-1917”

Reckson, Lindsay (August 2011) – “Realist Ecstasy: Enthusiasm in American Literature 1886 - 1938"

Londe, Gregory (June 2011) – “Enduring Modernism: Forms of Surviving Location in the 20th Century Long Poem”

Brown, Adrienne (June 2011) – “Reading Between the Skylines: The Skyscraper in American Modernism”

Russell, David (June 2011) – “A Literary History of Tact: Sociability, Aesthetic Liberalism and the Essay Form in Nineteenth-Century Britain”

Hostetter, Aaron (December 2010) – "The Politics of Eating and Cooking in Medieval English Romance"

Moshenska, Joseph (November 2010) – " 'Feeling Pleasures': The Sense of Touch in Renaissance England"

Walker, Casey (September 2010) – "The City Inside: Intimacy and Urbanity in Henry James, Marcel Proust and Virginia Woolf"

Rackin, Ethel (August 2010) – "Ornamentation and Essence in Modernist Poetry"

Noble, Mary (August 2010) – "Primitive Marriage: Anthropology and Nineteenth-Century Fiction"

Fox, Renee (August 2010) – "Necromantic Victorians: Reanimation, History and the Politics of Literary Innovation, 1868-1903"

Hopper, Briallen (June 2010) – “Feeling Right in American Reform Culture”

Lee, Wendy (June 2010) -- "Failures of Feeling in the British Novel from Richardson to Eliot"

Moyer, James (March 2010) – "The Passion of Abolitionism: How Slave Martyrdom Obscures Slave Labor”

Forbes, Erin (September 2009) – “Genius of Deep Crime:  Literature, Enslavement and the American Criminal”

Crawforth, Hannah (September 2009) – “The Politics and Poetics of Etymology in Early Modern Literature”

Elliott, Danielle (April 2009) – "Sea of Bones: The Middle Passage in Contemporary Poetry of the Black Atlantic”

Yu, Wesley (April 2009) – “Romance Logic: The Argument of Vernacular Verse in the Scholastic Middle Ages”

Cervantes, Gabriel (April 2009) – "Genres of Correction: Anglophone Literature and the Colonial Turn in Penal Law 1722-1804”

Rosinberg, Erwin (January 2009) – "A Further Conjunction: The Couple and Its Worlds in Modern British Fiction”

Walsh, Keri (January 2009) – "Antigone in Modernism: Classicism, Feminism, and Theatres of Protest”

Heald, Abigail (January 2009) – “Tears for Dido: A Renaissance Poetics of Feeling”

Bellin, Roger (January 2009) – "Argument: The American Transcendentalists and Disputatious Reason”

Ellis, Nadia (November 2008) – "Colonial Affections: Formulations of Intimacy Between England and the Caribbean, 1930-1963”

Baskin, Jason (November 2008) – “Embodying Experience: Romanticism and Social Life in the Twentieth Century”

Barrett, Jennifer-Kate (September 2008) – “ ‘So Written to Aftertimes’: Renaissance England’s Poetics of Futurity”

Moss, Daniel (September 2008) – “Renaissance Ovids: The Metamorphosis of Allusion in Late Elizabethan England”

Rainof, Rebecca (September 2008) – “Purgatory and Fictions of Maturity: From Newman to Woolf”

Darznik, Jasmin (November 2007) – “Writing Outside the Veil: Literature by Women of the Iranian Diaspora”

Bugg, John (September 2007) – “Gagging Acts: The Trials of British Romanticism”

Matson, John (September 2007) – “Marking Twain: Mechanized Composition and Medial Subjectivity in the Twain Era”

Neel, Alexandra (September 2007) – “The Writing of Ice: The Literature and Photography of Polar Regions”

Smith-Browne, Stephanie (September 2007) – “Gothic and the Pacific Voyage: Patriotism, Romance and Savagery in South Seas Travels and the Utopia of the Terra Australis”

Bystrom, Kerry (June 2007) – “Orphans and Origins: Family, Memory, and Nation in Argentina and South Africa”

Ards, Angela (June 2007) – “Affirmative Acts: Political Piety in African American Women’s Contemporary Autobiography”

Cragwall, Jasper (June 2007) – “Lake Methodism”

Ball, David (June 2007) – “False Starts: The Rhetoric of Failure and the Making of American Modernism, 1850-1950”

Ramdass, Harold (June 2007) – “Miswriting Tragedy: Genealogy, History and Orthography in the Canterbury Tales, Fragment I”

Lilley, James (June 2007) – “Common Things: Transatlantic Romance and the Aesthetics of Belonging, 1764-1840”

Noble, Mary (March 2007) – “Primitive Marriage: Anthropology and Nineteenth-Century Fiction”

Passannante, Gerard (January 2007) – “The Lucretian Renaissance: Ancient Poetry and Humanism in an Age of Science”

Tessone, Natasha (November 2006) – “The Fiction of Inheritance: Familial, Cultural, and National Legacies in the Irish and Scottish Novel”

Horrocks, Ingrid (September 2006) – “Reluctant Wanderers, Mobile Feelings: Moving Figures in Eighteenth-Century Literature”

Bender, Abby (June 2006) – “Out of Egypt and into bondage: Exodus in the Irish National Imagination”

Johnson, Hannah (June 2006) – “The Medieval Limit: Historiography, Ethics, Culture”

Horowitz, Evan (January 2006) – “The Writing of Modern Life”

White, Gillian (November 2005) – “ ‘We Do Not Say Ourselves Like That in Poems’: The Poetics of Contingency in Wallace Stevens and Elizabeth Bishop

Baudot, Laura (September 2005) – “Looking at Nothing: Literary Vacuity in the Long Eighteenth Century”

Hicks, Kevin (September 2005) – “Acts of Recovery: American Antebellum Fictions”

Stern, Kimberly (September 2005) – “The Victorian Sibyl: Women Reviewers and the Reinvention of Critical Tradition”

Nardi, Steven (May 2005) – “Automatic Aesthetics: Race, Technology, and Poetics in the Harlem Renaissance and American New Poetry”

Sayeau, Michael (May 2005) – “Everyday: Literature, Modernity, and Time”

Cooper, Lawrence (April 2005) – “Gothic Realities: The Emergence of Cultural Forms Through Representations of the Unreal”

Betjemann, Peter (November 2004) – “Talking Shop: Craft and Design in Hawthorne, James, and Wharton”

Forbes, Aileen (November 2004) – “Passion Play: Theaters of Romantic Emotion”

Keeley, Howard (November 2004) – “Beyond Big House and Cabin: Dwelling Politically in Modern Irish Literature”

Machlan, Elizabeth (November 2004) – “Panic Rooms: Architecture and Anxiety in New York Stories from 1900 to 9/11”

McDowell, Demetrius (November 2004) – “Hawthorne, James, and the Pressures of the Literary Marketplace”

Waldron, Jennifer (November 2004) – “Eloquence of the Body: Aesthetics, Theology, and English Renaissance Theater”

Modern and Contemporary Literature

English Literature research theme

Our research covers the full sweep of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, from modernism to contemporary media and culture.

We analyse literature and reading cultures across the world including English and Irish fantasy fiction, African American literary and visual culture, Black British and British Asian fiction, and authors in West and East Africa.

We believe in literature's importance for global infrastructures and human rights, exploring the effects and ethics of refugee narratives, postcolonial literature, life writing, queer poetics and environmental activism.

Our interdisciplinary approach shows how literature shapes and reflects fields such as law, evolutionary biology and the history of science. We investigate emerging forms and genres from early twentieth century magazines to contemporary popular fiction, and trace the impact of technologies like mass production, social media and artificial intelligence.

Researchers

• Dr Amy Burge - Popular fiction and romance
• Dr Dorothy Butchard - contemporary literature, popular fiction and digital media
• Dr Rona Cran - Twentieth century American literature
• Dr John Fagg - American art and literature
• Dr Rex Ferguson - Historical specificity of texts
• Dr Rosie Graham - Contemporary digital culture
• Dr Dave Gunning - Contemporary Anglophone literature and postcolonial studies
• Professor Alexandra Harris - British art and literature, especially in relation to landscape
• Dr Matt Hayler - Contemporary literature and digital cultures
• Dr Andrew Hodgson - English poetry and individualism
• Professor John Holmes - Scientific ideas and cultural forms in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, including poetry, architecture and the visual arts
• Professor David James - twentieth- and twenty-first-century writing, with a particular focus on the history and theory of the novel
• Professor Deborah Longworth - Nineteenth and twentieth century women writers
• Dr Daniel Moore - Nineteenth and twentieth century literature and visual culture
• Dr Chris Mourant - modernism and empire, twentieth century media history and textual scholarship
• Professor Peter Morey - 20th century, contemporary and postcolonial literary studies
• Dr Jimmy Packham - American Gothic literature and maritime writing
• Dr Rebecca Roach - Literature, media and book history
• Dr Asha Rogers - Modern and contemporary writing in English from across the postcolonial world
• Dr Philippa Semper - Modern fantasy literature
• Professor Max Saunders - Modern literature and culture
• Professor Lyndsey Stonebridge - Twentieth-century and contemporary literature, political theory, and history
• Dr Rachel Sykes - The twenty-first century American novel
• Dr Nathan Waddell - Early twentieth-century and Modernist literature
• Dr Sara K Wood - American literature and culture

Honorary and Emeritus

• Professor Andrzej Gasiorek - Twentieth century British literature and Modernism

Projects and Networks

• Future Thinking
• Arts of Place

Contemporary American literature & Media

• September 2016
• Conference: International conference on Changing Contours of English Literature
• At: Tamil Nadu
• Ordinal: Meenakshi College ( Women), Chennai -24
• Affiliation: University of Madras

• AHRC, Chennai 94

Discover the world's research

• 25+ million members
• 160+ million publication pages
• 2.3+ billion citations
• Recruit researchers
• Join for free
• Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.

View Full Resolution

Contemporary Literature

In this Issue

• Volume 61, Number 3, Fall 2020

Contemporary Literature publishes scholarly essays on contemporary writing in English, interviews with established and emerging authors, and reviews of recent critical books in the field. The journal welcomes articles on multiple genres, including poetry, the novel, drama, creative nonfiction, new media and digital literature, and graphic narrative. Contemporary Literature published the first articles on Thomas Pynchon and Susan Howe and the first interviews with Margaret Drabble and Don DeLillo; it also helped to introduce Kazuo Ishiguro, Eavan Boland, and J. M. Coetzee to American readers. As a forum for discussing issues animating the range of contemporary literary studies, Contemporary Literature features the full diversity of critical practices. The editors seek articles that frame their analysis of texts within larger literary historical, theoretical, or cultural debates.

published by

Viewing issue, table of contents.

• An Interview with Nicole Krauss
• Brett Ashley Kaplan
• pp. 283-302

• Refusing the Will to Health: Neoliberal Wellness Culture and Asian American Literature
• Sharon N. Tran
• pp. 303-334
• Theater of the Precariat: Staging Precarity in Alexander Zeldin's Love
• Peter Simonsen , Mathies G. Aarhus
• pp. 335-361
• Feralizing the Human/Animal Distinction in Bhanu Kapil's Humanimal
• Akash Belsare
• pp. 362-387
• Reading Affect in Harryette Mullen's S*PeRM**K*T
• Bronwen Tate
• pp. 388-410
• Toward Black Animality Studies
• Samantha Pergadia
• pp. 411-420
• Contemporary Poetry and Comparative Iterature
• Michael Leong
• pp. 421-428
• Contributors
• pp. 429-430

Previous Issue

Volume 61, Number 2, Summer 2020

Volume 61, Number 4, Winter 2020

Additional Information

Copyright © Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin.

Additional Issue Materials

Project MUSE Mission

Project MUSE promotes the creation and dissemination of essential humanities and social science resources through collaboration with libraries, publishers, and scholars worldwide. Forged from a partnership between a university press and a library, Project MUSE is a trusted part of the academic and scholarly community it serves.

2715 North Charles Street Baltimore, Maryland, USA 21218

+1 (410) 516-6989 [email protected]

©2024 Project MUSE. Produced by Johns Hopkins University Press in collaboration with The Sheridan Libraries.

Now and Always, The Trusted Content Your Research Requires

Built on the Johns Hopkins University Campus

Explore millions of high-quality primary sources and images from around the world, including artworks, maps, photographs, and more.

Explore migration issues through a variety of media types

• Part of Street Art Graphics
• Part of The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 34, No. 1 (Winter 2020)
• Part of Cato Institute (Aug. 3, 2021)
• Part of University of California Press
• Part of Open: Smithsonian National Museum of African American History & Culture
• Part of Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, Vol. 19, No. 1 (Winter 2012)
• Part of R Street Institute (Nov. 1, 2020)
• Part of Leuven University Press
• Part of UN Secretary-General Papers: Ban Ki-moon (2007-2016)
• Part of Perspectives on Terrorism, Vol. 12, No. 4 (August 2018)
• Part of Leveraging Lives: Serbia and Illegal Tunisian Migration to Europe, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (Mar. 1, 2023)
• Part of UCL Press

Harness the power of visual materials—explore more than 3 million images now on JSTOR.

Enhance your scholarly research with underground newspapers, magazines, and journals.

Explore collections in the arts, sciences, and literature from the world’s leading museums, archives, and scholars.

Scaling up public transport usage: a systematic literature review of service quality, satisfaction and attitude towards bus transport systems in developing countries

• Original Research
• Open access
• Published: 26 September 2024

Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

• Eugene Sogbe   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9243-3481 1 ,
• Susilawati Susilawati   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1831-6743 2 &
• Tan Chee Pin   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0162-3763 3  

Urban sprawl driven by urbanisation has contributed to a sharp rise in privately owned vehicles and competition for restricted resource space. The utilisation of private vehicles has increased, particularly in developing countries, and this phenomenon leads to many negative externalities, including traffic congestion and emissions. To encourage the use of sustainable modes such as public transport, it is essential for policymakers and transport authorities to carefully examine the determinants influencing public transport usage and apply successful policies and procedures. This review offers a valuable understanding of the contemporary knowledge regarding the determinants influencing bus transport usage. It systematically reviews 104 papers published since 2000 on service quality, satisfaction, and attitudes towards bus transport. The review shows that safety, security, comfort, reliability and accessibility are the most substantial determinants shaping users' views on service quality and satisfaction. This is particularly evident in situations like waiting at the bus stop, being on board the bus, and specific instances while walking to their destination. The results indicate that challenges with first-mile and last-mile connectivity are apparent, and further exploration in the context of developing countries is needed to understand these challenges, necessitating further investigation. It also demonstrates instrumental aspects such as convenience and social-symbolic aspects such as social standing, influencing attitudes towards public transport usage. It concludes by suggesting potential paths for future research and discusses the impacts of the results on policy decisions.

Explore related subjects

• Artificial Intelligence
• Automotive Engineering

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

1 Introduction

Urban sprawl driven by urbanisation has contributed to a sharp rise in privately owned vehicles and competition for restricted resource space (Yu et al. 2019 ; Li et al. 2020a ). Too many private vehicles on the road network lead to negative externalities, including congestion and emissions. Several of these external effects linked to the heightened utilisation of private vehicles can be addressed by reducing their usage to more viable modes of transport, like public transport (hereinafter, PT). Prior studies have documented the merits of using PT for individuals and cities through the promotion of good health, energy conservation and emission reduction, reduction in vehicular accidents, traffic congestion reduction, and provision of jobs (Nguyen-Phuoc et al. 2021 ; Cheranchery and Maitra 2018 ; van Soest et al. 2020 ; Truong and Currie 2019 ).

PT has experienced a decrease in usage in recent times (Boisjoly et al. 2018 ; Miller et al. 2018 ). This decline was exacerbated when many countries battled the COVID-19 outbreak (Jenelius and Cebecauer 2020 ; Sogbe 2021 ; Tirachini and Cats 2020 ). A decrease in PT usage is caused by many factors, including the built environment (BE), public policy, extent of economic development, and acquisition and utilisation of privately owned vehicles (Zhang et al. 2022 ). However, de Oña ( 2021 ) noted that service quality (hereinafter, SQ), satisfaction and behavioural intention or attitude towards PT are three crucial factors influencing a mode shift. Poor SQ (e.g., reliability, comfort) leads to a satisfaction gap and, subsequently, a negative attitude towards PT (Cheranchery and Maitra 2018 ). Thus, passengers’ satisfaction with PT and the ability to entice new users through a mode shift hinges on the quality of service (van Lierop and El-Geneidy 2016 ). This suggests that knowing the dimensions of PT usage and improving on them can mitigate the acquisition and use of private vehicles, which are competitors to PT and threats to the environment and human survival.

Pourbaix ( 2011 ) estimated an 80% global increase in daily urban travel using private vehicles by 2025, with the growth occurring in developing countries. Similarly, the World Health Organization ( 2011 ) noted that private vehicle usage in emerging countries is expected to supersede that of developed nations by 2030. Recent studies have confirmed these earlier projections (Saxena and Gupta 2023 ; Soltani 2017 ; Ntim et al. 2022 ). Besides, travel requirements in emerging and developed nations may differ due to differences in vehicle ownership, transport systems, infrastructure, and economic status. It is, therefore, necessary to apply successful policies and procedures to increase PT usage. However, this requires a thorough understanding of extant knowledge, clear-cut lacunae, and disagreements that must be resolved. Policymakers and transport authorities may lack the knowledge to make informed judgments without a complete and systematic research evaluation.

As far as we know, no systematic literature review focused on these three factors influencing PT usage. In a prior review, Das and Pandit ( 2013 ) reviewed aspects of bus transport service that impact users' perceived quality of service. This contributed significantly to the SQ factors that define the level of service of PT. However, while their study emphasised service factors, it did not provide a clear-cut methodology, and the selected literature is not exhaustive. de Ona and de Ona ( 2015 ) presented a review of SQ, providing an extensive review of methodologies deployed in the study of SQ and the merits and demerits of the methods. However, it focused more on the methodologies than the SQ attributes. Besides, most selected papers focused on SQ in the aviation industry. van Lierop et al. ( 2018 ) analysed important factors (i.e., satisfaction and loyalty). Their study provided insights into the features that encourage PT users to remain committed to using it. However, the scope of their review was limited by geographical boundaries, with only two papers from Africa and Asia each. Ojo ( 2019 ) subsequently provided a literature review of SQ attributes and the methodologies deployed. It highlighted the need to identify important attributes concerning the type of PT, regional context, and culture. However, the study limited the review to 2015; therefore, information about SQ from 2016 to the publication date, 2019 and subsequent years have been excluded.

This study aims to systematically review and examine existing literature on the attributes influencing PT usage, focusing specifically on three important factors: SQ, satisfaction and attitude towards PT usage within the context of developing countries to address the specific needs and concerns of passengers. It identifies and discusses the attributes based on qualitative (subjective) and quantitative (objective) assessments and the impact on the utilisation of PT. It should be mentioned that this research focused on public buses, including bus rapid transit (BRT), as these modes of transport are dominant and synonymous with most developing countries (Nguyen-Phuoc et al. 2021 ; Cheranchery and Maitra 2018 ).

The ensuing sections of this paper are structured as follows: Sect.  2 , which contains the methodology, provides the scope of the review and presents the strategy for the systematic literature search and selection. It is followed by Sect.  3 , which presents the results and the influence of SQ, satisfaction, and attitude towards PT usage. Section  4 offers future research directions and policy implications, including a synopsis of the evidence.

2 Methodology

The study adopted a systematic literature search using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines (Moher et al. 2015 ). The search was done in January 2023 and updated in July 2023. The data source repositories were TRID: TRIS and ITRD, Scopus, Web of Science, Inspec, Compendex and GeoBase. Having identified the keywords following an exploratory review, a search using Boolean operators was carried out:

(“public transport” OR “public transport usage” OR ridership) AND (factors AND “developing country”).

2.1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The criteria for including or excluding selected papers in the systematic review were as follows:

Papers were included if they focused on research conducted in developing countries.

Papers not in English were excluded.

Papers related to COVID-19 and PT were excluded. The study recognises the broader context of declining PT usage and the concurrent rise in private car usage in developing countries, as highlighted in the literature even before the pandemic outbreak. Moreover, it is essential to emphasise that while COVID-19 has undoubtedly impacted PT usage patterns in the short term, it is transient, and its long-term implications are uncertain. It is possible that some changes observed during the pandemic, such as increased remote work and a preference for private transportation to maintain social distancing, may persist to some extent even after the pandemic has subsided. However, historical trends suggest that PT remains a vital component of urban transportation systems, and factors such as population growth, urbanisation, environmental concerns, and congestion will continue to drive demand for efficient PT solutions. Therefore, while COVID-19 may have influenced PT usage patterns in the short term, its long-term impact remains to be seen, and other factors, such as SQ, satisfaction, and attitude towards PT, are most likely to play a significant role in shaping future trends.

Papers that combined SQ and satisfaction of various modes, including paratransit, were excluded.

Only peer-reviewed research or journal articles were included.

Papers on SQ, satisfaction, and attitudes towards public bus transport, including BRT in developing countries, were included. This is because bus transport is a widespread means of transportation synonymous with many developing countries.

Papers published between 2000 and 2023 were considered.

The search in the repositories mentioned above yielded the following results: TRID: TRIS and ITRD (15,000), Scopus (32,010), Web of Science (3752), Inspec (1603), Compendex (2012) and GeoBase (1558). Further details of the search process and results are provided in Table  1 and Fig.  1 . This resulted in a total of 55,935 articles gathered, with subsequent field restrictions applied, leading to 2483 records (refer to Table  1 ). This number was imported into Rayyan (Ouzzani et al. 2016 ), and 962 duplicates were removed, leaving 1521 records. The authors then screened titles and abstracts to determine whether they focus on (i) SQ and satisfaction with public bus transport and (ii) attitudes towards PT. The inclusion and exclusion criteria are listed above. This was done to narrow the selection to articles aligned with the topic, resulting in 335 chosen for full-text review. Of these, 13 articles were unavailable, leaving 322 for full-text review. In the full-text review, 92 records were excluded for lacking relevance to the research theme, 67 for combining SQ and satisfaction of different modes, 35 for focusing on paratransit and related modes, and 30 for concentrating on the built environment as a factor. The snowballing method identified 10 additional studies from reference lists, of which 6 were retained following the same criteria. The systematic search produced an extensive body of literature on the subject, with a final selection of 104 papers for the review. The PRISMA flow diagram in Fig.  1 depicts the number of records at each stage and the reasons for exclusion and inclusion.

PRISMA flow diagram

Various pieces of information were documented from each of the records. Initially, general details, including author(s) and publication year, were extracted to provide the research’s context and scope. Subsequently, we scrutinised the methodologies employed for data analysis (such as SEM), the data source (primary or secondary), approaches for collecting data (such as questionnaires or interviews), and the sample size. Finally, data were compiled on the constructs that were assessed.

3.1 Patterns in literature

China leads in publications, accounting for nearly a quarter of all studies (23), followed by India with under one-fifth (18), Brazil (7), Ghana (6), Vietnam (5), Bangladesh (6), and Ethiopia (6). Other countries collectively share the remaining research. Azerbaijan is transcontinental, with 1 study and 1 review article focusing on developing countries. It is evident that research predominantly centres on Asian countries, and there is a dearth of research in developing nations beyond Asia. These countries can potentially introduce fresh perspectives to the research on the subject. Figure  2 illustrates the publication count by country, while Fig.  3 shows the geographical distribution.

Distribution of publications by country (by July 2023)

Distribution of publications by continent (by July 2023)

3.2 Methodological approaches and empirical findings in PT research

The articles in this literature review utilised qualitative and quantitative data and data analysis methods. Quantitative data involves collecting data through surveys, experiments, or statistical analysis. On the other hand, qualitative data provides insights into attitudes, opinions, behaviours, or motivations and is often gathered through interviews or observations. The plurality of studies analysed in this review relied solely on quantitative data (98). In two cases, qualitative data was used. Mogaji and Nguyen ( 2021 ) utilised semi-structured interviews to investigate the level of contentment of passengers with disabilities. In addition, Simangunsong et al. ( 2023 ) used interviews to assess the perception of BRT users. In four cases, qualitative data was integrated with quantitative data. Thai and Quan ( 2023 ) combined interviews and surveys to analyse the determinants influencing urban individuals' inclination to utilise buses. Kacharo et al. ( 2022 ) studied the safety and security of female passengers using focus group discussions and questionnaires. Araya et al. ( 2022 ) combined a questionnaire survey, ethnographic observations and document reviews to evaluate the safety and security of women on public buses. Finally, Busco et al. ( 2023 ) examined the connection between bus transport and social exclusion using surveys and focus group discussions. The majority of studies relied on primary data sources (94); however, a few utilised secondary sources, including data gathered by transit agencies (7) or initially gathered for different research projects (3). The primary method of data collection in most cases was through questionnaire surveys.

There are vast differences in sample sizes, with the least being 29 respondents from a questionnaire survey (Ganji et al. 2021 ) and the highest being 588,000 from a transit agency entry data (Guzman et al. 2019 ). Common analysis methods deployed include the service quality (SERVQUAL) model and service performance (SERVPERF) model, which have been widely used, structural equation modelling (SEM), importance performance analysis, different kinds of regression analysis and machine learning algorithms such as random forest (RF) and gradient boost decision trees (GBDT).

While most studies leaned towards quantitative analysis, a few incorporated qualitative data, demonstrating a balanced exploration of the subject matter. Moreover, the range of sample sizes across studies underscores the diversity in research approaches, from smaller-scale surveys to extensive transit agency data analysis. This variation reflects the complexity and breadth of the topic under investigation, accommodating different methodological requirements and research objectives. A spectrum of techniques was employed in terms of analysis methods. The diversity of research methodologies and analytical approaches showcased in the literature contributes to a comprehensive understanding of PT usage dynamics and SQ assessment. Researchers can glean valuable insights into the complex interplay between SQ, passenger satisfaction, and mode choice behaviour by exploring qualitative and quantitative findings.

The literature debates the best possible methodology for examining SQ dimensions and satisfaction. The SERVQUAL model established by Parasuraman et al. ( 1985 ) measures commuter differences in appreciation and expectation of SQ dimensions. Nonetheless, Cronin and Taylor ( 1992 ), as cited by Esmailpour et al. ( 2020 ), highlighted that the measure of commuters' expectations is not of the essence and, in lieu, put forward the SERVPERF model, which utilises performance perception to measure SQ. Matzler et al. ( 2004 ), cited by Zhang et al. ( 2019a ), highlighted that, albeit salient, IPA has a linear and symmetric association between satisfaction as a dimension and satisfaction in general, which they claimed is a distorted supposition. The authors made a case for the three-factor theory as a better alternative to eliminate distortions.

Similarly, Tuan et al. ( 2022 ) indicated that the IPA has crucial conceptual and methodological constraints, favouring the three-factor theory. Zheng et al. ( 2022 ) made a case for the three-factor theory, arguing that the other methods, including linear regression, are flawed because they presume linearity and symmetricity for SQ dimensions. Fang et al. ( 2021 ) shared the same viewpoint concerning IPA; however, by contrast, they added that the three-factor theory also has the same weakness as IPA in determining the hierarchy of significance of commuter satisfaction and, therefore, proposed GBDT and Impact Asymmetry Analysis (IAA).

3.3 Identifying qualitative and quantitative factors that impact perceptions of SQ and satisfaction

Over time, researchers have employed a broad array of factors to examine the utilisation of PT. Among these, SQ and satisfaction encompass a vast number of studies. In this section, we present a summary of these factors, which were informed by qualitative and quantitative assessments, and their impact on utilising bus transport.

Nathanail ( 2008 ) posited that the SQ of PT is assessed through two leading indicators. The objective indicator, provided by operators, is a quantitative metric for comparison with standards or past performance. The subjective indicator, derived from surveys, offers qualitative measures, capturing users' perceptions by evaluating the gap between actual and ideal service levels. Quantitative factors are typically measured using numerical data. For example, frequency—quantifying the regularity and frequency of PT services, indicating how often vehicles are available, travel time—assessing the duration it takes PT vehicles to travel between stops or destinations, etc. and qualitative factors involve subjective assessments of availability or passenger comfort. Although these two measures exist, a plurality of the studies employed qualitative factors. On the other hand, very few researchers have focused on measuring these factors quantitatively. The SQ and satisfaction factors that significantly impact PT usage overlap. Nonetheless, we discuss them separately for clarity.

Cronin and Taylor ( 1992 ) defined SQ as “an attitude that reflects a comprehensive, long-term evaluation.” Parasuraman et al. ( 1985 ) provided a historical definition of SQ: “SQ perceptions result from comparing consumer expectations with actual service performance.” This has led to the widely embraced perspective that excellent SQ entails delivering performance that either meets or surpasses customers' expectations of the service. Commuter perception constitutes a crucial aspect of SQ. In our analysis, 47 papers assessed commuters’ perception of SQ. Most papers examined SQ with various factors, such as availability, reliability, safety, security, cleanliness, etc. Table 2 summarises the literature on SQ, which is incorporated in this review.

Two factors that featured prominently in most papers in the review are the perception of passengers regarding their safety (30) and security (19) during transit, with one paper each considering quantitative insights. The authors asserted that safety and security are the most influential determinants of public bus usage and are strongly associated with gender (Ikhlaq et al. 2017 ; Alomari et al. 2023 ; Suman et al. 2016 ; Deb and Ali Ahmed 2018 ; Houria and Farès, 2019 ; Adom-Asamoah et al. 2021 ; Nguyen-Phuoc et al. 2021 ; Busco et al. 2022 , 2023 ; Araya et al. 2022 ; Kacharo et al. 2022 ; Verma et al. 2020 ). Safety and security have an overarching impact on other latent attributes (Wang and Zhu 2014 ), and this is reflected while on-board the bus (Hu et al. 2015 ; Orozco-Fontalvo et al. 2019 ; Yarmen and Sumaedi 2016 ) or while waiting at the bus stop or station, especially at night (Busco et al. 2022 ; Esmailpour et al. 2020 ; Suman et al. 2016 ; Noor and Iamtrakul 2023 , 2024 ). Addressing safety and security concerns is vital for building public trust, encouraging ridership, and creating a positive experience for passengers using PT.

Another significant qualitative factor in this review is service reliability (20), with 19 papers measuring qualitative aspects. Chakrabarti and Giuliano ( 2015 ) defined reliability “as one which consistently operates according to its schedule or plan.” The varying aspects of this factor complicate it. For example, the arrival and departure of PT may be timely, but disparities in the dwell time over the period may lead to delays and impact schedule adherence, potentially affecting the reliability of the service about meeting predetermined schedules. While timely performance significantly influences passengers’ use of bus services (Deepa et al. 2022 ; Cheranchery and Maitra 2018 ; Randheer et al. 2011 ; Sam et al. 2018 ; Das and Pandit 2015 ), in-vehicle time poses a significant obstacle to the use of bus services (Maitra et al. 2015 ; Thai and Quan 2023 ; Shen et al. 2016 ). In-vehicle time refers to the duration passengers spend travelling inside the bus or other PT vehicles. This time spent in transit can significantly influence passengers' decisions regarding bus services. Factors such as longer travel times or perceived inefficiencies during the journey can pose obstacles or challenges that may deter individuals from utilising bus services. Therefore, understanding and addressing issues related to in-vehicle time is crucial for improving the attractiveness and efficiency of bus services. In addition, waiting time indirectly impacts passengers’ perception of the reliability of PT (Hu et al. 2015 ; Chaudhary 2020 ; Fu et al. 2018 ). As demonstrated through the various studies, a reliable PT system contributes to increased ridership and positively impacts overall transportation behaviour. The ability of PT to adhere to schedules, provide consistent service, and minimize disruptions plays a pivotal role in shaping users' perceptions and preferences. Addressing and improving reliability issues can be crucial for promoting PT's widespread and sustainable use.

Affordability as a qualitative factor involves the assessment of user perceptions of the cost of PT services. In our review, 16 papers examined affordability, with twelve considering qualitative insights. The authors opted for varied terminologies to label this attribute. Most authors measured affordability as fare (6), cost or coined travel cost (7), ticket price (2), pricing or price (2) and affordability (1). Many PT users view affordability as a deciding factor. A principal reason for using PT is low bus fares (Kacharo et al. 2022 ; Birago et al. 2017 ; Alomari et al. 2023 ; Sam et al. 2014 ) and an increment in transport fares engender a decrease in PT usage (Maitra et al. 2015 ; Joewono et al. 2016 ; Adom-Asamoah et al. 2021 ) and low-income earners are the hardest hit by the increases (Toro-González et al. 2020 ). This indicates that for most passengers, the use of PT is contingent on affordability.

In 14 papers, the authors asserted that commuters’ perceived comfort is a significant driver of PT usage. Some of these papers examined the overall influence of comfort on PT usage and its association with in-vehicle crowding (Saleem et al. 2023 ; Sam et al. 2014 ; Deepa et al. 2022 ; Thai and Quan 2023 ; Atombo and Wemegah 2021 ; Birago et al. 2017 ; Houria and Farès, 2019 ; Adom-Asamoah et al. 2021 ), in-vehicle comfort, precisely seating comfort, the temperature inside the bus and facilities at the station (Deb and Ali Ahmed 2018 ; Shen et al. 2016 ; Alomari et al. 2023 ; Esmailpour et al. 2020 ; Hu et al. 2015 ). In our review, eight papers evaluated crowdedness in the bus or at stations (Shen et al. 2016 ; Deb and Ali Ahmed 2018 ; Maitra et al. 2015 ; Chaudhary 2020 ). Shen et al. ( 2016 ) highlighted that crowdedness substantially influences commuters’ perception of comfort and has a more pronounced effect on commuters standing than those seated.

In our review, 16 papers measured accessibility, with nearly all (13) considering qualitative insights. Aspects considered include the ease with which passengers can navigate PT systems, such as information availability or ease of use (Busco et al. 2023 ; Houria and Farès, 2019 ; Ikhlaq et al. 2017 ). Other qualitative factors include cleanliness inside the bus and seats (8) (Deepa et al. 2022 ; Chaudhary 2020 ; Saleem et al. 2023 ; Hu et al. 2015 ; Birago et al. 2017 ), availability (9) (Adom-Asamoah et al. 2021 ; Hu et al. 2015 ; Atombo and Wemegah 2021 ), driver behaviour, speed and customer care.

Regarding quantitative factors, three papers measured accessibility by considering aspects such as service coverage (Insani et al. 2021 ) and the number of vehicles in service (Toro-González et al. 2020 ; Rabay et al. 2021 ). Challenges with transfers, access and egress modes can deter commuters from using PT. Insani et al. ( 2021 ) noted that switching between buses contributes to extended travel time, posing a distinct drawback for PT users, and integration with other modes of PT is recommended. Toro-González et al. ( 2020 ) concluded that increasing the number of vehicles in operation results in a rise in PT demand. Nonetheless, this depends on the speed of the vehicles. Four papers measured affordability (Guzman et al. 2019 ; Rabay et al. 2021 ; Toro-González et al. 2020 ; Insani et al. 2021 ). One paper each measured indirect aspects of reliability and frequency of PT; Insani et al. ( 2021 ) measured waiting and travel time, while Toro-González et al. ( 2020 ) measured the frequency of arrival and departure.

Other researchers advocated and used a combination of qualitative and quantitative assessments. Combining these measures could offer a more practical and dependable tool for assessing transit SQ (de Ona and de Ona 2015 ). In our review, two papers used both measures to assess commuters’ perception of SQ and satisfaction. Rong et al. ( 2022 ) measured perceived and actual time-related factors such as stopping, dwell, waiting, and travel times. In addition to time-related factors, Suman et al. ( 2016 ) measured connectivity, cost, security, punctuality, accessibility, comfort and safety.

3.3.1 Satisfaction

While SQ involves a cognitive assessment of the variance between initial expectations and perceived performance, satisfaction is its emotional equivalent. It pertains to the customer's contentment or dissatisfaction with the service (Carvalho Dos Reis Silveira et al. 2022 ). Table 3 shows a summary of the literature on satisfaction, which is incorporated in this review. In our review, 52 papers examined commuters' satisfaction with PT usage. Virtually, all the papers used a range of service factors, such as accessibility, reliability, and cleanliness, to mention a few. In some instances, we observed that alternative factors like passenger expectation (2) and perceived value (2) were considered satisfaction factors. Also, mood, emotions and cognitive activities (1) were used as satisfaction attributes. In urban environments characterised by high population density and extensive PT networks, factors influencing commuters' satisfaction with PT services are of paramount importance. Geographical nuances, social dynamics, and the nature of PT offerings are pivotal in shaping passengers' experiences and perceptions.

Commuters face many challenges when utilising bus transport across diverse urban landscapes, from bustling metropolises to smaller urban centres. Accessibility is critical, particularly for individuals with disabilities or mobility limitations. Ramps for wheelchairs (Ali and Abdullah 2023 ; Ji and Gao 2010 ), accessible stations (Jayakumar et al. 2023 ; Chaisomboon et al. 2020 ; Girma 2022 ), information accessibility regarding signage about routes, schedules, and facilities (Nguyen and Pojani 2023 ; Han et al. 2022 ; Girma et al. 2022 ), information regarding announcements to inform passengers about stops, transfers, and other relevant information (Fang et al. 2021 ; Lan et al. 2022 ; Fu and Juan 2017) and technological accessibility regarding real-time information through apps or displays, assisting passengers in planning their journeys (Mendez et al. 2019 ; Bose and Pandit 2020 ; Li et al. 2020b ). These are essential elements ensuring inclusivity and ease of use for all passengers.

In the rapidly urbanising environments of developing countries, where PT infrastructure may be limited and urban congestion is common, the comfort of passengers during their transit journeys becomes paramount. Factors such as comfort while waiting and riding (Githui et al. 2009 ; Zhang et al. 2019b ; Nwachukwu et al. 2019 ; Tuan et al. 2022 ), the temperature in the bus (Wu et al. 2016 ; Freitas 2013 ), seating comfort (Andaleeb et al. 2007 ; Githui et al. 2009 ) and ventilation (Esmailpour et al. 2020 ), and the condition of vehicles (Umme et al. 2022 ; Singh 2016 ) significantly influence passenger satisfaction. The qualitative insights gleaned from 32 examined papers shed light on how these comfort-related factors impact passenger perceptions and contribute to their overall satisfaction with bus transport services. Studies conducted by Andaleeb et al. ( 2007 ), Allen et al. ( 2019 ), Nwachukwu et al. ( 2019 ), and others highlighted the tangible effect of improved comfort measures on passenger satisfaction, emphasising the importance of addressing these factors within the unique context of developing country urban settings.

Furthermore, safety and security concerns loom large in commuters' minds, influencing their overall satisfaction with bus transport. Whether waiting at a bus stop (Sun et al. 2020 ; Zhang et al. 2019a ) or navigating through crowded vehicles (Ali and Abdullah 2023 ), passengers prioritise their well-being and peace of mind. Enhancing safety measures and providing a secure environment can significantly improve the attractiveness of bus transport services.

Affordability is another pressing issue, especially in urban areas where the cost of living may be high. Passengers evaluate the financial accessibility of bus transport services, weighing fares against their budgetary constraints. As such, pricing strategies and fare structures are pivotal in shaping commuters' perceptions of affordability and satisfaction.

In addition to these qualitative factors, quantitative metrics such as reliability, comfort, and availability also come into play. On-time performance, seating comfort, and frequency of services directly impact passengers' experiences and satisfaction levels. PT operators must maintain high standards across these dimensions to meet urban commuters' diverse needs and expectations. Table 4 shows the categorisation of qualitative and quantitative factors influencing satisfaction.

3.4 Attitude towards PT

Private car ownership and usage are often considered deterrents to PT utilisation. Reza Jalilvand et al. ( 2012 ) highlighted that a person's attitude influences their actions, and the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) suggests attitudes impact behavioural intentions (Ajzen 1991 ). Scholars have thus explored the attitudes and intentions of non-PT users, particularly private car users. Social-symbolic, affective and instrumental aspects influence the acquisition and use of cars (Gatersleben 2007 ). In our review, the papers on attitudes towards PT usage are scanty, and most travel behaviour research to date has primarily centred on instrumental aspects. Table 5 shows a summary of the literature on attitudes towards bus transport usage, which is incorporated in this review.

Four papers focused on instrumental aspects, while one paper focused on social-symbolic aspects. The instrumental aspects assessed include cost, flexibility, safety, reliability, travel time, direct lines, comfort, speed and convenience (Tao et al. 2019 ; Al-Ayyash and Abou-Zeid 2019 ; de Magalhães and Rivera-Gonzalez 2021 ; Li et al. 2019b ) and social-symbolic aspects such as success and status (Li et al. 2019a ). The intention of car users to use PT is considerably influenced by cost, reliability, comfort, travel time, and connectivity and enhancing these factors will boost the intention to use PT (Li et al. 2019b ; de Magalhães and Rivera-Gonzalez 2021 ).

In addition to understanding the factors influencing attitudes towards PT usage, it is crucial to consider the implications of these attitudes for PT policy and planning. For instance, emphasising instrumental aspects such as cost, reliability, and comfort highlights the importance of improving SQ to encourage PT adoption among private car users. Similarly, the recognition of social-symbolic aspects, such as perceptions of success and status associated with car ownership, underscores the need for targeted marketing and messaging campaigns to challenge prevailing cultural norms and promote the social desirability of PT usage. By addressing instrumental and social-symbolic factors, policymakers and urban planners can develop more effective strategies to incentivise PT usage and reduce reliance on private cars.

3.5 Evolution and trends in PT SQ and satisfaction research

Until the last two decades, few studies on PT SQ and satisfaction were conducted in emerging countries. The rapid growth of urban populations and increased income levels resulting from economic improvement generated a significant demand for individual mobility, hence the increased need for assessing this subject.

According to our review, the service factors influencing PT usage investigated over the decades are no different from those assessed today except for a few variations and additions. Before 2020, the investigation predominantly involved qualitative assessments of SQ and satisfaction factors. Since 2020, there has been a shift towards quantitative assessments, including accessibility, reliability, affordability, and transfers.

Since time immemorial, SQ factors like cleanliness, accessibility, reliability, comfort, affordability, etc., have been used in assessing SQ. However, in the last couple of years, researchers introduced factors which impact service reliability into the analysis, such as frequency, waiting time, turning frequency, stopping frequency, travel time, arrival interval, on-time performance, punctuality, information and transfer convenience.

The methodology for data collection and data analysis on the subject has also evolved from SERVQUAL and SERVPERF models and descriptive statistics (Aniley and Negi 2010 ; Randheer et al. 2011 ) to more robust methods such as SEM and ML algorithms like GBDT and RF (Nguyen-Phuoc et al. 2021 ; Lan et al. 2022 ; Fu 2022 ). With technological advancements, different data collection methods have been adopted, such as using social media, ticketing data, PT data, and automatic vehicle location (AVL) data (Rong et al. 2022 ; Suman et al. 2016 ; Tavares et al. 2021 ; Zheng et al. 2021 ; Rabay et al. 2021 ).

An emerging trend involves examining the preferences of different commuter groups. The extant literature revealed disparities in the desired quality and satisfaction of SQ dimensions among PT users. This diversity among commuters has led researchers and practitioners to emphasise heterogeneity in the PT market. Segmenting commuter groups can help transport authorities provide tailored services to meet the satisfaction of specific user groups (Allen et al. 2019 ) and allocate resources effectively for targeted interventions (Fu 2022 ). Our review revealed that such disaggregation has been chiefly conducted for youth, students, tourists, groups considered vulnerable (such as older people, women, and people with disabilities, PWD’s) and more recently, for captive and choice riders.

Based on the scarce literature available regarding segmentation according to elderly passengers, it can be inferred that elderly passengers’ satisfaction is greatly influenced by station broadcast, driver’s habit, punctuality, awnings, complaint handling, safety and security, driver courtesy, information services, waiting time with station broadcast being the most important (Yuan et al. 2019 ; Chaisomboon et al. 2020 ; Lan et al. 2022 ; Busco et al. 2023 ). Moreover, older public bus users encounter deficiencies in bus stop infrastructure, accessibility and information (Busco et al. 2023 ).

Researchers have explored segmentation based on the frequency of PT usage, dividing commuters into frequent and occasional riders. Fang et al. ( 2021 ), Tuan et al. ( 2022 ), Cheranchery and Maitra ( 2018 ) and Maitra et al. ( 2015 ) investigated the relationship between bus service dimensions and overall satisfaction for both rider groups. Aside from finding notable variance in how these groups perceived SQ, they found dimensions both groups prioritise in common: availability and accessibility (Tuan et al. 2022 ), waiting area, driver's behaviour, complaint handling, stop announcements (Fang et al. 2021 ).

Concerning students, diverse factors influence their satisfaction with PT. Agyeman and Cheng ( 2020 ) found that frequent breakdowns and extended travel times hinder school bus transport, affecting pupils' learning environment, while for university students, reliability and punctuality are of concern when using public buses (Javid and Al-Kasbi 2021 ). Furthermore, fare, comfort, reliability, and safety are vital attributes that impact the choice of PT (Sam et al. 2014 ) and fear of sexual harassment caused female students to avoid public buses (Nguyen and Pojani 2023 ). Jomnonkwao et al. ( 2022 ) switched the scope slightly by focusing on parents' perceptions of school bus SQ, highlighting that infrastructure, information, and safety dimensions influence their views.

Regarding youth commuters, there is proof that enhancing factors like performance, comfort, and assurance would boost satisfaction among youth PT passengers. What’s more, Busco et al. ( 2023 ) concluded that young PT users lack safety and SQ and face issues of harassment on PT systems. Nwachukwu et al. ( 2019 ) are the sole researchers who examined tourists' satisfaction. According to their results, tourists are discontent with PT usage, citing several SQ factors, particularly accessibility.

In our review, only two papers investigated the travel satisfaction of disabled travellers. Mogaji and Nguyen ( 2021 ) found gender-based disparities in travel satisfaction, noting that disabled women's satisfaction was more influenced by security, vulnerability, and the need for assistance compared to disabled men, while high floors in PT vehicles, crowded conditions, and untrained staff are factors affecting PT usage for people with disabilities (Ali and Abdullah 2023 ). Moreover, they also emphasised the lack of sufficient space for mobility aids in PT as a prominent challenge.

The segmentation also considered the viewpoint of female commuters. From the literature, safety and security are major quality issues and a significant barrier to public bus usage, given that a substantial portion of women experiences sexual molestation and psychological and physical violence often perpetrated by conductors and male co-passengers on buses and at bus stops (Busco et al. 2023 ; Saigal et al. 2021 ; Kacharo et al. 2022 ; Verma et al. 2017 ; Orozco-Fontalvo et al. 2019 ; Araya et al. 2022 ; Umme et al. 2022 ). In a recent review, Noor and Iamtrakul ( 2023 ) highlighted the prevalence of harassment on PT and the lack of responsive policy support to address this issue in developing countries. Figure  4 shows a schematic representation of the evolution and trends in PT SQ and satisfaction research in developing countries.

Evolution and trends in PT SQ and satisfaction research in developing countries

4 Future research directions and policy implications

4.1 synopsis of the evidence.

The results in Sect.  3 reveal that using PT for commuting is affected by various SQ factors, satisfaction-related aspects, and attitudes. These effects span pre-commute, commute, and post-commute phases. We highlight the attributes which have been discussed in this literature review.

Safety and security stand out as one of the crucial dimensions influencing users' perception of SQ and satisfaction. This finding contrasts with van Lierop et al. ( 2018 ) conclusions, who concluded that safety is not such a strong indicator of satisfaction in developed countries like those in Europe.

Commuters’ perception of reliability also correlates with usage and satisfaction. Overall, this aspect wields a substantial impact on satisfaction. This observation is consistent with the findings of van Lierop et al. ( 2018 ), who highlighted that enhancing the onboard experience is only advantageous if passengers are content with the service's reliability. On the other hand, comfort is a crucial factor during both the pre-commute and commute phases.

The convenience of individuals accessing and using PT services is crucial in determining PT systems' overall effectiveness and inclusivity. Accessibility, according to the review, is among the most critical attributes that impact satisfaction. Improving accessibility in PT is essential for creating a system that is convenient, equitable, and capable of meeting the population's diverse needs.

Affordability is another important factor. Many PT users are motivated by its affordability, and any rise in cost disproportionately affects individuals in the lower income brackets (Adom-Asamoah et al. 2021 ).

Availability is a significant service factor for frequent and occasional users, especially in developing countries (Tuan et al. 2022 ). Passengers anticipate a PT system that offers easy access without prolonged waiting times or difficulties reaching their desired destinations.

Another notable factor is crowdedness, which illustrates how a single SQ attribute can affect others. Crowdedness affects both comfort and safety on buses and can contribute to incidents of harassment against female passengers (Orozco-Fontalvo et al. 2019 ).

Challenges with first-mile and last-mile (hereinafter, FM/LM) connectivity are apparent, yet they are underexplored in the context of developing countries, necessitating further investigation. Other underexplored factors include connectivity (how well different modes of transportation are connected), transfers (the process of switching between various modes of transport), waiting environment (the conditions while waiting for transport) and waiting facilities (amenities provided for passengers while waiting). Climate change and heat stress can significantly impact the comfort and accessibility of PT in various ways. As temperatures rise due to climate change, extreme heat events become more frequent, posing challenges for passengers and the transport infrastructure. Rising temperatures due to climate change can lead to increased heat stress, especially during heatwaves, making waiting at outdoor transit stops uncomfortable and prolonged exposure to high temperatures while waiting for transit or during the journey can result in heat-related illnesses, affecting the well-being of passengers. Fraser and Chester ( 2017 ) posited that the design of transit systems, including the placement of stops and schedules, contributes to environmental exposure and may pose potential health risks, particularly during periods of extreme heat due to access and waiting. Improving the aesthetics of bus stops and incorporating diverse design elements can positively impact the thermal comfort of bus riders by enhancing their perception of beauty and pleasantness (Dzyuban et al. 2022 ). Addressing the effect of climate change on PT comfort and accessibility requires a comprehensive approach that involves collaboration between transit agencies, urban planners and policymakers. Sustainable and resilient solutions can increase the overall PT SQ in the face of changing climate conditions.

Until 2000, limited studies investigated SQ and commuters' satisfaction; since then, researchers focused primarily on qualitative assessments of the factors. The turning point for quantitative and qualitative assessments began in 2020 due to technological advancements that aided data collection procedures. As mentioned in Sect.  3 , there is a difference in how frequent and occasional users perceive SQ and their satisfaction. Further understanding of occasional users and improvements in these aspects can entice them to increase usage. In addition, the attitudes of private car users can provide valuable insights into their preferences, perceptions, and behaviours related to using PT systems.

4.2 Future research directions

Historically, transport researchers have explored the factors that influence PT usage. While our review uncovers valuable information, it also highlights significant areas that require further investigation. The first of these areas concerns exploring a less studied population group: private car users. Given the rise of private car acquisition and usage in developing countries, as mentioned in the introduction, shifting attention to this group is crucial. Recent attempts (Li et al. 2019a , b ; Al-Ayyash and Abou-Zeid 2019 ; Tao et al. 2019 ; De Magalhães and Rivera-Gonzalez 2021 ) have begun to address this, yet their approaches have been somewhat limited. For example, the target population for Al-Ayyash and Abou-Zeid ( 2019 ) included only university students and staff, which may not represent generalisability. Particular focus is required on SQ, satisfaction, and attitude towards PT. These areas are crucial for transport authorities and policymakers to intervene effectively.

The second area highlighted in the literature is problems with connectivity—FM/LM, but there is a paucity of literature. PT involves multiple journey stages, including waiting, walking, and switching between different modes, causing inconvenience (Park et al. 2021 ). The literature on transfers and satisfaction is scanty and conflicting. Das and Pandit ( 2015 ) noted more than two, Andaleeb et al. ( 2007 ) highlighted no transfers, and Li et al. ( 2020b ) indicated transfer convenience. Future studies must further probe transfers and their influence on PT usage and satisfaction. In addition, research should explore how transit authorities can adopt adaptive measures and sustainable practices to ensure that PT remains a reliable and comfortable option for all, even in the face of changing climate conditions.

Additional research avenue pertains to data collection methodologies. Qualitative research, such as interviewing individuals central to the subject, yields insights into PT usage factors. While most studies used questionnaires, there is potential for qualitative approaches. This approach aids in comprehending underlying influences by delving into the motivations behind mode shifts. For example, Mogaji and Nguyen ( 2021 ) investigated disabled commuters' satisfaction with PT using semi-structured interviews. Mystery shopping (MS) can also be employed for data collection. While MS in PT is known and implemented in practice, its exploration in academic literature remains limited, with only a few papers currently available (Voß et al. 2020 ). de Ona and de Ona ( 2015 ) and Voß et al. ( 2020 ) argued that using questionnaires in academic settings frequently lacks in-depth justification.

Finally, an area that may be explored is Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS), which is gaining attention in developed countries and emphasising car access over ownership. Integrating bus transit within MaaS initiatives holds significant potential for enhancing urban mobility by providing users with seamless, multimodal transportation options. Several key factors influence the successful integration of bus transit into MaaS ecosystems, each playing a crucial role in shaping the accessibility, efficiency, and sustainability of PT networks.

Technology integration : One of the fundamental aspects of integrating bus transit into MaaS platforms is the seamless integration of technology. Users can conveniently access, plan, and pay for their bus journeys by leveraging mobile applications, contactless payment systems, and real-time tracking (Lyons et al. 2020 ). This technological integration enhances the overall user experience and encourages the adoption of bus transit as part of MaaS solutions.

Interoperability : Another critical factor is interoperability, which ensures the smooth integration of various transport modes within MaaS platforms. By enabling users to seamlessly switch between buses, trains, ridesharing, and micro-mobility services, interoperability enhances the flexibility and convenience of multimodal travel (Bushell et al. 2022 ). This interoperability requires collaboration between different transport providers and the development of common standards for data exchange and service integration.

Data sharing : Collaboration and data sharing among stakeholders are essential for optimizing bus transit services within MaaS ecosystems. By sharing data on routes, schedules, fares, and occupancy levels, transit agencies and technology providers can improve the efficiency and reliability of bus services (Chen and Acheampong 2023 ). Therefore, service integration is somewhat linked to the integration of data, which is indispensable for enabling service providers to make informed operational decisions (Kamargianni and Goulding 2018 ). This data-driven approach enables better planning, real-time monitoring, and predictive analytics, leading to more responsive and customer-centric transit operations.

Physical integration : This involves the physical infrastructure and connectivity between different modes of transport within a MaaS system, such as buses, trains, bikes, and ride-sharing services. Physical integration ensures seamless transfers and convenient access for passengers, enhancing the overall efficiency and attractiveness of the transit network (Saliara 2014 ).

Fare integration : It involves integrating fare payment systems across various modes of transport within a MaaS ecosystem. This allows passengers to use a single ticket or payment method to access different transit modes, including buses, trains, and ride-sharing services (Audouin 2019 ). Fare integration simplifies the passenger payment process, reduces transactional barriers, and encourages multimodal usage, ultimately enhancing public transport systems' overall efficiency and user experience.

Policy and regulation : Supportive policies and regulations play a crucial role in enabling the integration of bus transit into MaaS initiatives. Policies that promote open data standards, fare integration schemes, and public–private partnerships create an enabling environment for innovation and collaboration. Clear regulatory frameworks and support from central governments help address legal and governance issues and facilitate the implementation of MaaS solutions (Smith et al. 2018 ).

Partnerships and collaboration : Collaboration among public and private sector stakeholders is essential for driving innovation and fostering collective action towards integrating bus transit with MaaS initiatives. Partnerships between transit agencies, technology providers, urban planners, and community organisations enable the exchange of information, the consolidation of resources, and collaborative decision making (Merkert et al. 2020 ). Collaborative efforts contribute to developing integrated, user-centric MaaS solutions that address the diverse needs of urban populations.

4.3 Policy implications

The review offers a valuable understanding of the contemporary knowledge regarding the determinants influencing PT usage and the approach used to research them in developing countries. In this concluding section, we recommend enhancing the commuting experience and promoting greater utilisation of PT.

Identifying distinct SQ and satisfaction concerns while investigating ways to curb the rise in private vehicle usage can raise awareness among policymakers, transport operators, and transport authorities. Emphasising the alignment of SQ improvements with passengers' needs and expectations is crucial. This user-centric approach can foster more inclusive and customer-focused PT systems, as commuting experiences affect travellers' subjective well-being (De Vos et al. 2013 ). There are several instances where SQ improvements have an impact on ridership (with experiences also related to developed countries). For example, enhancements in comfort-related features of the Chicago transit system led to a notable 5% rise in the number of riders, equivalent to 15 million additional trips per year over 5 years (Foote 2004 ), enhancing the speed and frequency of buses in Ireland led to a decrease in car usage, reducing it from 34 to 22% (Redman et al. 2013 ), the introduction of an Integrated Ticketing System in cities such as London, New York, Haifa, Washington, Madrid, Chicago, various locations in Italy, San Francisco, Quebec, Montreal, and Seoul resulted in an increase in weekday patronage for both subway and bus services (Suman and Bolia 2019 ). SQ improvements are needed, and discourse on this subject requires attention.

In numerous developing countries, entrepreneurs primarily lead transport services, receiving limited governmental backing (Yeboah and Asibey 2019 ). Investments in transport infrastructure are necessary to curtail growing private car use for commuting. PT authorities should allocate resources towards sustainable modes of transport. For example, substantial investments in Australia's bus systems in recent decades have resulted in significant increases in ridership, primarily attributed to extensive service reorganisation and frequency improvements. Among these investments, BRT systems have demonstrated notable impacts at the corridor level, contributing to a 40% increase in new passengers from car drivers, a 17% increase from car passengers, and a 27% growth in new trips (Currie and Wallis 2008 ).

Data availability

Data sharing does not apply to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

Automatic fare collection

Analysis of Variance

Automatic vehicle location

Cluster analysis

Confirmatory factor analysis

Customer satisfaction index analysis

Discrete choice experiment

Discriminant function analysis

Exploratory factor analysis

First-mile last-mile

Gradient boosting decision trees

Impact asymmetry analysis

Importance performance analysis

Importance-satisfaction analysis

Latent class cluster analysis

Level of Conformity

Multi-criteria decision making

Machine learning

Multinomial logit

Ordinal logit regression

Principal components analysis

Not available

Partial least squares

Penalty reward contrast analysis

• Public transport

Random forest

Revealed preference

Structural equation modelling

Service quality (based on expectancy-disconfirmation paradigm)

Stated preference

• Service quality

Urban transport passenger survey

Adebiyi SO, Akinrinmade OJ, Amole BB (2022) Optimizing service quality management of the bus rapid transport system in Lagos using the multi-criteria decision analysis. Sci J Sil Univ Technol Ser Transp 116:5–23. https://doi.org/10.20858/sjsutst.2022.116.1

Article   Google Scholar  

Adom-Asamoah G, Asibey MO, Nyarko S (2021) Rethinking or affirming the “affordability” debate on the efficiency of urban public transport usage: case of Kumasi, Ghana. Transp Dev Econ 7:22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40890-021-00131-6

Agyeman S, Cheng L (2020) Analysis of barriers to perceived service quality in Ghana: students’ perspectives on bus mobility attributes. Transp Policy 99:63–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.08.015

Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Al-Ayyash Z, Abou-Zeid M (2019) Investigating commute satisfaction differences of private car users and public transport users in a developing country context. Transportation 46:515–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10000-2

Ali H, Abdullah M (2023) Exploring the perceptions about public transport and developing a mode choice model for educated disabled people in a developing country. Case Stud Transp Policy 11:100937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.100937

Allen J, Muñoz JC, Ortúzar JDD (2019) Understanding public transport satisfaction: using Maslow’s hierarchy of (transit) needs. Transp Policy 81:75–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.06.005

Alomari AH, Khedaywi TS, Jadah AA, Marian ARO (2023) Evaluation of public transport among university commuters in rural areas. Sustainability 15(1):312. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010312

Andaleeb SS, Haq M, Ahmed RI (2007) Reforming innercity bus transportation in a developing country: a passenger-driven model. J Public Transp 10(1):1–25. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.10.1.1

Aniley B, Negi R (2010) Service quality attributes affecting passengers’ satisfaction with HIGER city bus. Ethiop J Bus Econ (The) 1:70–98

Google Scholar  

Araya AA, Legesse AT, Feleke GG (2022) Women’s safety and security in public transport in Mekelle, Tigray. Case Stud Transp Policy 10:2443–2450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.10.019

Aslam MW, Batool Z (2017) Evaluation of urban bus transport failure in Gujranwala City of Pakistan. Mehran Univ Res J Eng Technol 36:469–478

Atombo C, Wemegah TD (2021) Indicators for commuter’s satisfaction and usage of high occupancy public bus transport service in Ghana. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect 11:100458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100458

Audouin MUJ (2019) Towards mobility-as-a-service: a cross-case analysis of public authorities' roles in the development of ICT-supported integrated mobility schemes. PhD thesis, EPFL

Bahreini A, Mirzan H, Moeinaddini M, Asadi-Shekari Z, Shah MZ, Sultan Z (2016) Evaluating significant factors that influence public transport usage in Kerman, Iran. Plan Malaysia 14(4):99–108. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v14i4.151

Birago D, Mensah SO, Sharma S (2017) Level of service delivery of public transport and mode choice in Accra, Ghana. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 46(Part B):284–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.09.033

Boisjoly G, Grisé E, Maguire M, Veillette M-P, Deboosere R, Berrebi E, El-Geneidy A (2018) Invest in the ride: a 14 year longitudinal analysis of the determinants of public transport ridership in 25 North American cities. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 116:434–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.07.005

Bose T, Pandit D (2020) Heterogeneity in perception of service quality attributes of bus transit across various user categories—a case of Kolkata. Transp Res Procedia 48:2784–2799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.239

Busco C, Gonzalez F, Lillo N (2022) Safety, Gender, and the Public Transport System in Santiago, Chile. Sustainability 14(24):16484. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416484

Busco C, González F, Carmona P, Cancino A, Alonso B (2023) Social exclusion and the public bus system in Santiago, Chile. Cities 132:104092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104092

Bushell J, Merkert R, Beck MJ (2022) Consumer preferences for operator collaboration in intra- and intercity transport ecosystems: institutionalising platforms to facilitate MaaS 2.0. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 160:160–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.04.013

Carvalho Dos Reis Silveira T, Romano CA, Gadda TMC (2022) Loyalty and public transit: a quantitative systematic review of the literature. Transp Rev 42:362–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.1991032

Chaisomboon M, Jomnonkwao S, Ratanavaraha V (2020) Elderly users’ satisfaction with public transport in Thailand using different importance performance analysis approaches. Sustainability 12(21):9066. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219066

Chakrabarti S, Giuliano G (2015) Does service reliability determine transit patronage? Insights from the Los Angeles Metro bus system. Transp Policy 42:12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.04.006

Chaudhary ML (2020) Commuters' perceptions on service quality of bus rapid transit systems: evidence from the cities of Ahmedabad, Surat and Rajkot in India. Eur Transp 79(7):1–16

Chen Y, Acheampong RA (2023) Mobility-as-a-service transitions in China: emerging policies, initiatives, platforms and MaaS implementation models. Case Stud Transp Policy 13:101054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2023.101054

Cheranchery MF, Maitra B (2018) Investigating perception of captive and choice riders for formulating service standards of ordinary and premium buses in Indian cities. Transp Policy 72:89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.10.002

Cronin JJ, Taylor SA (1992) Measuring service quality: a reexamination and extension. J Mark 56:55–68. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252296

Currie G, Wallis I (2008) Effective ways to grow urban bus markets—a synthesis of evidence. J Transp Geogr 16:419–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.04.007

Danthanarayana CT (2019) Evaluation of public transportation mode choice with passenger satisfaction: a case study of the semi-luxury bus service on the Panadura-Kandy route in Sri Lanka. J Eastern Asia Soc Transp Stud 13:1382–1399. https://doi.org/10.11175/easts.13.1382

Das S, Pandit D (2013) Importance of user perception in evaluating level of service for bus transit for a developing country like India: a review. Transp Rev 33:402–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2013.789571

Das S, Pandit D (2015) Determination of level-of-service scale values for quantitative bus transit service attributes based on user perception. Transportmetrica A Transp Sci 11:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2014.910563

Dashdamirov F, Javadli U, Verdiyev T (2022) Comparative analysis of the weight and quality of urban bus transport services: a case study of Baku. Sci J Sil Univ Technol Ser Transp 116:99–111. https://doi.org/10.20858/sjsutst.2022.116.6

de Aquino JT, Da De Souza JV, Silva VDL, Jeronimo TD, De Melo FJC (2018) Factors that influence the quality of services provided by the bus rapid transit system: a look for user’s perception. Benchmarking Int J 25:4035–4057. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-12-2017-0344

de Magalhães DJAV, Rivera-Gonzalez C (2021) Car users’ attitudes towards an enhanced bus system to mitigate urban congestion in a developing country. Transp Policy 110:452–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.06.013

de Oña J (2021) Service quality, satisfaction and behavioral intentions towards public transport from the point of view of private vehicle users. Transportation 49:237–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-021-10175-7

de Ona J, de Ona R (2015) Quality of service in public transport based on customer satisfaction surveys: a review and assessment of methodological approaches. Transp Sci 49:605–622. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2014.0544

De Vos J, Schwanen TV, Acker V, Witlox F (2013) Travel and subjective well-being: a focus on findings, methods and future research needs. Transp Rev 33:421–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2013.815665

Deb S, Ali Ahmed M (2018) Determining the service quality of the city bus service based on users’ perceptions and expectations. Travel Behav Soc 12:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2018.02.008

Deb SA, Ahmed M, Das D (2022) Service quality estimation and improvement plan of bus Service: a perception and expectation based analysis. Case Stud Transp Policy 10:1775–1789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.07.008

Deepa L, Mondal A, Raman A, Pinjari AR, Bhat CR, Srinivasan KK, Pendyala RM, Ramadurai G (2022) An analysis of individuals’ usage of bus transit in Bengaluru, India: disentangling the influence of unfamiliarity with transit from that of subjective perceptions of service quality. Travel Behav Soc 29:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2022.05.001

Dzyuban Y, Hondula DM, Coseo PJ, Redman CL (2022) Public transit infrastructure and heat perceptions in hot and dry climates. Int J Biometeorol 66:345–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-021-02074-4

Esmailpour J, Aghabayk K, Vajari MA, De Gruyter C (2020) Importance-performance analysis (IPA) of bus service attributes: a case study in a developing country. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 142:129–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.10.020

Fang D, Xue Y, Cao J, Sun S (2021) Exploring satisfaction of choice and captive bus riders: an impact asymmetry analysis. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102798

Foote PJ (2004) Making buses better in Chicago: strategic implementation of customer-derived performance measures from 1995 to 2001. Transp Res Rec 1884:18–26. https://doi.org/10.3141/1884-03

Fraser AM, Chester MV (2017) Transit system design and vulnerability of riders to heat. J Transp Health 4:216–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2016.07.005

Freitas ALP (2013) Assessing the quality of intercity road transportation of passengers: an exploratory study in Brazil. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 49:379–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.042

Fu X (2022) What should we do to enhance your loyalty if you are (dis)satisfied with public transit service? Travel Behav Soc 26:28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2021.09.002

Fu X-M, Zhang J-H, Chan FTS (2018) Determinants of loyalty to public transit: a model integrating satisfaction-loyalty theory and expectation-confirmation theory. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 113:476–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.05.012

Ganji SS, Ahangar AN, Awasthi A, Bandari SJ (2021) Psychological analysis of intercity bus passenger satisfaction using Q methodology. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 154:345–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.10.023

Gatersleben B (2007) Affective and symbolic aspects of car use. In: Gärling T, Steg L (eds) Threats from car traffic to the quality of urban life. Emerald, pp. 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1108/9780080481449-012

Gholi H, Kermanshah M, Reza Mamdoohi A (2022) Investigating the sources of heterogeneity in passengers’ preferences for transit service quality. J Public Transp 24:100014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubtr.2022.100014

Girma M (2022) Evaluating service performance of public bus transit service: a case study of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Urban Plan Transp Res 10:483–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2022.2112274

Girma M, Woldetensae B, Nuriye G, Lika T (2022) Importance performance analysis for evaluating city bus service quality in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Urban Plan Transp Res 10:451–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2022.2099968

Githui JN, Okamura T, Nakamura F (2009) The structure of users' satisfaction on urban public transport service in developing country: the case of Nairobi. In: Proceedings of the Eastern Asia society for transportation studies, pp 232–232. https://doi.org/10.11175/eastpro.2009.0.232.0

Guzman LA, Gomez S, Moncada CA (2019) Short run fare elasticities for Bogotá’s BRT system: ridership responses to fare increases. Transportation 47:2581–2599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10034-6

Hadiuzzman M, Das T, Hasnat MM, Hossain S, Musabbir SR (2017) Structural equation modeling of user satisfaction of bus transit service quality based on stated preferences and latent variables. Transp Plan Technol 40:257–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2017.1283155

Han YG, Zhao L, Ma H (2022) Satisfaction of public transport service quality and improvement strategies based on importance-performance matrix. CICTP 2022:2888–2900

He L, Yang D, Li J (2021) Improving the service quality of public transit with exclusive bus lanes: a perspective from passenger satisfaction. J Adv Transp 2021:8599256. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8599256

Houria B, Farès B (2019) The quality of service in urban public transport in Algeria. Int J Qual Serv Sci 11:559–575. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-11-2017-0107

Hu X, Zhao L, Wang W (2015) Impact of perceptions of bus service performance on mode choice preference. Adv Mech Eng 7:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814015573826

Ikhlaq S, Javid MA, Qayyum TI (2017) Evaluation of user’s perceptions regarding performance indicators of intercity bus terminals in Lahore, Pakistan. Transp Probl 12:123–136. https://doi.org/10.20858/tp.2017.12.2.12

Insani TD, Handayani W, Astuti MFK, Basuki KH, Setiadji BH (2021) A performance study of bus rapid transit lite: toward a resilient Semarang City. Transp Probl 16:105–118. https://doi.org/10.21307/TP-2021-045

Javid MA, Al-Kasbi GH (2021) Factors affecting students’ intentions to use a university bus: importance of travel attitudes and service quality attributes. J Eng Res (Kuwait) 9(4B):83–97. https://doi.org/10.36909/jer.9727

Jayakumar M, Sahu PK, Majumdar BB, Pani A (2023) Analysis of travel satisfaction with commuting in developing economy: a case of New Delhi, India. Transp Dev Econ 9(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40890-022-00177-0

Jenelius E, Cebecauer M (2020) Impacts of COVID-19 on public transport ridership in Sweden: analysis of ticket validations, sales and passenger counts. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect 8:100242

Ji J, Gao X (2010) Analysis of people’s satisfaction with public transportation in Beijing. Habitat Int 34:464–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.12.003

Joewono TB, Tarigan AKM, Susilo YO (2016) Road-based public transportation in urban areas of Indonesia: what policies do users expect to improve the service quality? Transp Policy 49:114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.04.009

Jomnonkwao S, Banyong C, Nanthawong S, Janhuaton T, Ratanavaraha V, Champahom T, Jongkol P (2022) Perceptions of parents of the quality of the public transport services used by children to commute to school. Sustainability 14(20):13005. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013005

Kacharo DK, Teshome E, Woltamo T (2022) Safety and security of women and girls in public transport. Urban Plan Transp Res 10:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2022.2027268

Kamargianni M, Goulding R (2018) The mobility as a service maturity index: preparing the cities for the mobility as a service era. Transport Research Arena. Zenodo

Lan J, Xue Y, Fang D, Zheng Q (2022) Optimal strategies for elderly public transport service based on impact-asymmetry analysis: a case study of Harbin. Sustainability 14(3):1320. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031320

Li B, Cao JX (2018) Analysis of influencing factors on satisfaction degree for urban public transit service based on structural equation model. In: 18th COTA international conference of transportation professionals, pp 685–694

Li J, Xu L, Yao D, Mao Y (2019a) Impacts of symbolic value and passenger satisfaction on bus use. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 72:98–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.04.012

Li L, Cao M, Bai Y, Song Z (2019b) Analysis of public transportation competitiveness based on potential passenger travel intentions: case study in Shanghai, China. Transp Res Rec 2673:823–832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119825648

Li S, Lyu D, Huang G, Zhang X, Gao F, Chen Y, Liu X (2020a) Spatially varying impacts of built environment factors on rail transit ridership at station level: a case study in Guangzhou, China. J Transp Geogr 82:102631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102631

Li XW, Fan JK, Wu Y, Chen J, Deng XF (2020) Exploring influencing factors of passenger satisfaction toward bus transit in small-medium city in China. Discrete Dyn Nat Soc 2020:8872115. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8872115

Lyons G, Hammond P, Mackay K (2020) Reprint of: the importance of user perspective in the evolution of MaaS. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 131:20–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.11.024

Maitra B, Dandapat S, Chintakayala P (2015) Differences between the perceptions of captive and choice riders toward bus service attributes and the need for segmentation of bus services in urban India. J Urban Plan Dev 141:04014018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000205

Majumdar BB, Jayakumar M, Sahu PK, Potoglou D (2021) Identification of key determinants of travel satisfaction for developing policy instrument to improve quality of life: an analysis of commuting in Delhi. Transp Policy 110:281–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.06.012

Matzler K, Bailom F, Hinterhuber HH, Renzl B, Pichler J (2004) The asymmetric relationship between attribute-level performance and overall customer satisfaction: a reconsideration of the importance–performance analysis. Ind Mark Manag 33:271–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(03)00055-5

Mendez JT, Lobel H, Parra D, Herrera JC (2019) Using twitter to infer user satisfaction with public transport: the case of Santiago, Chile. IEEE Access 7:60255–60263. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2915107

Meng T, Zhang D, Zhang Y, Meng X (2016) A study on public transport service satisfaction using factor analysis: a case study of Jiangsu long-distance passenger transport. Int J Simul Syst Sci Technol 17:32.1-32.6. https://doi.org/10.5013/IJSSST.a.17.45.32

Merkert R, Bushell J, Beck MJ (2020) Collaboration as a service (CaaS) to fully integrate public transportation—lessons from long distance travel to reimagine mobility as a service. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 131:267–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.025

Miller EJ, Shalaby A, Diab E, Kasraian D (2018) Canadian transit ridership trends study. Candian Urban Transit Association (CUTA), Toronto

Mogaji E, Nguyen NP (2021) Transportation satisfaction of disabled passengers: evidence from a developing country. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 98:102982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102982

Mohammed M, Senadheera S (2022) Public transport affordability evaluation for Addis Ababa City. Sustainability 14:6883

Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA, Group P-P (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1

Naim MNH, Adnan MSG, Dewan A, Zannat KE (2022) Assessing the performance of public transport services in a developing country: a case study using data envelopment analysis. Growth Chang 53:377–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12588

Nathanail E (2008) Measuring the quality of service for passengers on the hellenic railways. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 42:48–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2007.06.006

Nguyen XP (2019) The bus transportation issue and people satisfaction with public transport in Ho Chi Minh City. J Mech Eng Res Dev 42:10–16. https://doi.org/10.26480/jmerd.01.2019.10.16

Nguyen MH, Pojani D (2023) Why are Hanoi students giving up on bus ridership? Transportation 50:811–835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-021-10262-9

Nguyen-Phuoc DQ, Tran AT, Van Nguyen T, Le PT, Su DN (2021) Investigating the complexity of perceived service quality and perceived safety and security in building loyalty among bus passengers in Vietnam—a PLS-SEM approach. Transp Policy 101:162–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.12.010

Noor S, Iamtrakul P (2023) Women’s access to urban public transport: toward addressing policy constraints in combating sexual harassment. Transp Policy 137:14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.04.010

Noor S, Iamtrakul P (2024) A semi-systematic literature review, identifying the relationship between transit environments and women’s fear of victimization in transportation systems: a global perspective. Public Transp 16:551–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-024-00350-1

Ntim JA, Anokye P, Asibey MO (2022) City challenge: user perception on the governance and quality of parking spaces in Central Business District of Kumasi, Ghana. Transp Dev Econ 9:4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40890-022-00174-3

Nwachukwu AA, Gladys NI, Chikezie OK (2019) Tourists’ satisfaction with public transport services in Lagos, Nigeria. Acta Univ Carol Geogr 54:67–80. https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2019.7

Ojo TK (2019) Quality of public transport service: an integrative review and research agenda. Transp Lett 11:104–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2017.1283835

Orozco-Fontalvo M, Soto J, Arévalo A, Oviedo-Trespalacios O (2019) Women’s perceived risk of sexual harassment in a bus rapid transit (BRT) system: the case of Barranquilla, Colombia. J Transp Health 14:100598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2019.100598

Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A (2016) Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 5:210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4

Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL (1985) A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. J Mark 49:41–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298504900403

Park K, Farb A, Chen S (2021) First-/last-mile experience matters: the influence of the built environment on satisfaction and loyalty among public transit riders. Transp Policy 112:32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.08.003

Pourbaix J (2011) Towards a smart future for cities: urban transport scenarios for 2025. Public Transp Int 60(3):8–10

Quddus M, Rahman F, de Monsuur F, Ona J, Enoch M (2019) Analyzing bus passengers’ satisfaction in Dhaka using discrete choice models. Transp Res Rec 2673(2):758–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119825846

Rabay L, Meira LH, Andrade MOD, Oliveira LKD (2021) A portrait of the crisis in the Brazilian urban bus system: an analysis of factors influencing the reduction in usage. Case Stud Transp Policy 9:1879–1887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.10.009

Randheer K, Al-Motawa AA, Vijay PJ (2011) Measuring commuters’ perception on service quality using SERVQUAL in public transportation. Int J Mark Stud 3(1):21–34

Redman L, Friman M, Gärling T, Hartig T (2013) Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users: a research review. Transp Policy 25:119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.11.005

Reza Jalilvand M, Samiei N, Dini B, Yaghoubi Manzari P (2012) Examining the structural relationships of electronic word of mouth, destination image, tourist attitude toward destination and travel intention: an integrated approach. J Destin Mark Manag 1:134–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2012.10.001

Rong R, Liu L, Jia N, Ma S (2022) Impact analysis of actual traveling performance on bus passenger’s perception and satisfaction. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 160:80–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.03.029

Saigal T, Vaish AK, Rao NVM (2021) Role of safety in declining public transport use: empirical evidence from India. J Econ Adm Sci 39(4):1302–1317. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-08-2021-0150

Saleem MA, Afzal H, Ahmad F, Ismail H, Nguyen N (2023) An exploration and importance-performance analysis of bus rapid transit systems’ service quality attributes: evidence from an emerging economy. Transp Policy 141:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.07.010

Saliara K (2014) Public transport integration: the case study of Thessaloniki, Greece. Transp Res Proc 4:535–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2014.11.041

Sam EF, Adu-Boahen K, Kissah-Korsah K (2014) Assessing the factors that influence public transport mode preference and patronage: perspectives of students of University of Cape Coast (UCC), Ghana. Int J Dev Sci 3:323–336

Sam EF, Hamidu O, Daniels S (2018) SERVQUAL analysis of public bus transport services in Kumasi metropolis, Ghana: core user perspectives. Case Stud Transp Policy 6:25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2017.12.004

Saxena A, Gupta V (2023) Carpooling: Who is closest to adopting it? An investigation into the potential car-poolers among private vehicle users: a case of a developing country, India. Transp Policy 135:11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.03.007

Shen X, Feng S, Li Z, Hu B (2016) Analysis of bus passenger comfort perception based on passenger load factor and in-vehicle time. SpringerPlus 5:62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1694-7

Simangunsong REE, Rakhmatulloh AR, Dewi DIK, Adrie FM, Nugraheni DMK (2023) Passengers' perceptions of the service quality and operation of a bus rapid transit system (Transemarang) in Semarang, Indonesia. Transp Probl Int Sci J 18(1)

Singh S (2016) Assessment of passengers satisfaction with public bus transport services: a case study of Lucknow city (India). Stud Bus Econ 11:107–128. https://doi.org/10.1515/sbe-2016-0039

Sinha SS, Swamy HM, Modi K (2020) User perceptions of public transport service quality. Transp Res Proc 48:3310–3323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.121

Smith G, Sochor J, Sarasini S (2018) Mobility as a service: comparing developments in Sweden and Finland. Res Transp Bus Manag 27:36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2018.09.004

Sogbe E (2021) The evolving impact of coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on public transportation in Ghana. Case Stud Transp Policy 9:1607–1614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.08.010

Soltani A (2017) Social and urban form determinants of vehicle ownership; evidence from a developing country. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 96:90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.12.010

Soto J, Orozco-Fontalvo M, Useche SA (2022) Public transportation and fear of crime at BRT Systems: approaching to the case of Barranquilla (Colombia) through integrated choice and latent variable models. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 155:142–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.11.001

Suman HK, Bolia NB (2019) A review of service assessment attributes and improvement strategies for public transport. Transp Dev Econ 5:1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40890-018-0069-x

Suman HK, Bolia NB, Tiwari G (2016) Analysis of the factors influencing the use of public buses in Delhi. J Urban Plan Dev 142:04016003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000316

Sun S, Fang D, Cao J (2020) Exploring the asymmetric influences of stop attributes on rider satisfaction with bus stops. Travel Behav Soc 19:162–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.01.004

Tao S, He SY, Thøgersen J (2019) The role of car ownership in attitudes towards public transport: a comparative study of Guangzhou and Brisbane. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 60:685–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.12.005

Tavares VB, Lucchesi ST, Larranaga AM, Cybis HBB (2021) Influence of public transport quality attributes on user satisfaction of different age cohorts. Case Stud Transp Policy 9:1042–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.04.018

Thai NH, Quan TM (2023) Factors affecting urban people's intention to use buses in Vietnam. Transp Probl 18:89–101

Tirachini A, Cats O (2020) COVID-19 and public transportation: current assessment, prospects, and research needs. J Public Transp 22(1):1–34. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.22.1.1

Toro-González D, Cantillo V, Cantillo-García V (2020) Factors influencing demand for public transport in Colombia. Res Transp Bus Manag 36:100514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100514

Truong LT, Currie G (2019) Macroscopic road safety impacts of public transport: a case study of Melbourne, Australia. Accid Anal Prev 132:105270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.105270

Umme A, Aya K, Hisashi K (2022) An analysis of the women commuters’ satisfaction in the public bus service in Bangladesh: a survey on local buses in major cities. J Transp Technol 12:559–577. https://doi.org/10.4236/jtts.2022.124033

van Lierop D, El-Geneidy A (2016) Enjoying loyalty: The relationship between service quality, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intentions in public transit. Res Transp Econ 59:50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2016.04.001

van Lierop D, Badami MG, El-Geneidy AM (2018) What influences satisfaction and loyalty in public transport? A review of the literature. Transp Rev 38:52–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2017.1298683

van Soest D, Tight MR, Rogers CDF (2020) Exploring the distances people walk to access public transport. Transp Rev 40:160–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2019.1575491

Van Tuan VA, Truong N, Tetsuo S, An NN (2022) Public transport service quality: policy prioritization strategy in the importance-performance analysis and the three-factor theory frameworks. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 166:118–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.10.006

Verma M, Manoj M, Rodeja N, Verma A (2017) Service gap analysis of public buses in Bangalore with respect to women safety. Transp Res Procedia 25:4322–4329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.283

Verma M, Rodeja N, Manoj M, Verma A (2020) Young women’s perception of safety in public buses: a study of two Indian cities (Ahmedabad and Bangalore). Transp Res Procedia 48:3254–3263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.151

Voß S, Mejia G, Voß A (2020) Mystery shopping in public transport: the case of bus station design. In: Stephanidis C, Marcus A, Rosenzweig E, Rau P-LP, Moallem A, Rauterberg M (eds) HCI International 2020—late breaking papers: user experience design and case studies. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 527–542

Wang H, Zhu D (2014) Factors that impact bus transport satisfaction in Shanghai, China. Proc Inst Civ Eng Transp 167:185–193. https://doi.org/10.1680/tran.12.00051

Weng J, Di X, Wang C, Wang J, Mao L (2018) A bus service evaluation method from passenger’s perspective based on satisfaction surveys: a case study of Beijing, China. Sustainability 10(8):2723. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082723

World Health Organization (2011) Urban transport and health: a sourcebook for policy-makers in developing cities. World Health Organization, Geneva

Wu J, Yang M, Rasouli S, Xu C (2016) Exploring passenger assessments of bus service quality using Bayesian networks. J Public Transp 19(3):36–54. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.19.3.3

Yarmen M, Sumaedi S (2016) Perceived service quality of youth public transport passengers. Transp Probl 11:99–111. https://doi.org/10.20858/tp.2016.11.1.10

Yasir S, Ahmad T, Enam A (2022) An analysis of the harassments and challenges faced by the public transport users in a developing country of South Asia. Front Built Environ 8:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2022.1049121

Yeboah V, Asibey MO (2019) Transport and historical changes in Kumasi’s growth and form. Case Stud Transp Policy 7:802–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2019.08.001

Yu L, Xie B, Chan EHW (2019) Exploring impacts of the built environment on transit travel: distance, time and mode choice, for urban villages in Shenzhen, China. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 132:57–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2019.11.004

Yuan Y, Yang M, Wu J, Rasouli S, Lei D (2019) Assessing bus transit service from the perspective of elderly passengers in Harbin, China. Int J Sustain Transp 13:761–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1512691

Zhang C, Cao X, Nagpure A, Agarwal S (2019a) Exploring rider satisfaction with transit service in Indore, India: an application of the three-factor theory. Transp Lett Int J Transp Res 11:469–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2017.1398484

Zhang C, Liu Y, Lu W, Xiao G (2019b) Evaluating passenger satisfaction index based on PLS-SEM model: evidence from Chinese public transport service. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 120:149–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.12.013

Zhang C, Wang M, Dong J, Lu W, Liu Y, Ni A, Yu X (2022) Factors and mechanism affecting the attractiveness of public transport: macroscopic and microscopic perspectives. J Adv Transp 2022:5048678. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5048678

Zheng Y, Kong H, Petzhold G, Barcelos MM, Zegras CP, Zhao J (2021) User satisfaction and service quality improvement priority of bus rapid transit in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Case Stud Transp Policy 9:1900–1911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.10.011

Zheng Y, Kong H, Petzhold G, Barcelos MM, Zegras CP, Zhao J (2022) Gender differences in the user satisfaction and service quality improvement priority of public transit bus system in Porto Alegre and Fortaleza, Brazil. Travel Behav Soc 28:22–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2022.02.003

Zhou X, Liang J, Ji X, Cottrill CD (2019) The influence of information services on public transport behavior of urban and rural residents. Sustainability 11(19):5454. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195454

Download references

Acknowledgements

This manuscript is part of Eugene Sogbe's PhD research project. The authors sincerely thank Prof. Stefan Voß, the Editor-in-Chief, and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful feedback on the original manuscript. However, the authors acknowledge full responsibility for the contents of this paper.

Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions. This research was funded by Sunway Bhd. under the Scientific and technological approach to assessing the impact of elevated canopy walkways and bus rapid transit (BRT) on traffic in the Bandar Sunway project [Project ID: MRD-000006 and Grant code: 2600006-113-00].

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, 47500, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia

Eugene Sogbe

Monash Climate-Resilient Infrastructure Research Hub (M-CRInfra), School of Engineering, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, 47500, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia

Susilawati Susilawati

Department of Robotics and Mechatronics Engineering, School of Engineering, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, 47500, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia

Tan Chee Pin

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

E. Sogbe: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, validation, resources, investigation, and visualization. S. Susilawati: supervision, writing—review and editing, project administration, and funding acquisition. C. P. Tan: supervision and data curation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eugene Sogbe .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors have no competing interests to declare relevant to this article's content.

Ethics approval

This systematic literature review did not involve any primary data collection with human or animal subjects and, therefore, did not require ethical approval. All data analysed were obtained from publicly available sources and previously published studies.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Sogbe, E., Susilawati, S. & Pin, T.C. Scaling up public transport usage: a systematic literature review of service quality, satisfaction and attitude towards bus transport systems in developing countries. Public Transp (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-024-00367-6

Download citation

Accepted : 06 August 2024

Published : 26 September 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-024-00367-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Satisfaction
• Developing country
• Sustainable transport
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Download Free PDF

Contemporary Issues in Literature: A Case Study of Ngugi wa Thiong'o's A Grain of Wheat

Related papers

Like sociology, Literature is concerned with man"s social world, his adaptation to it and his desire to improve it. Literature is a social institution, which uses Language as its medium. Literature represents life and to a large extent, a social reality. An ideal literature therefore reflects the happenings in its society. It reflects the economy, politics, religion and culture of its society. It consequently mirrors the diverse mood and tempers of its society. Specifically, African Literature is a vital tool in the hands of African literary artists, used to criticize the social, economic and political situations in their African society with the aim of challenging and proffering solutions to the unpleasant and oppressive practices by its leaders and the led. This particular inquiry examines how Otagburuagu"s "Echoes of violence" and Osorfisan"s "Colours Makes the Thunder King" have revealed the political situations in Nigeria. This exploration is anchored on the sociological theory of literature. This theory studies the correlation between Literature and society as the different norms of behavior in different societies and they are reflected in their respective literature; descriptive data analysis technique, primary and secondary data collection methods. This study reveals that African literary writers have taken the position of judges, Umpires, national reformers, civil right activists and cultural revivalists all for the emancipation of Africa and Africans.

African Studies Review

Studia Anglica Resoviensia, 2015

Golden Plume HN, 2020

The purpose of this research paper is to examine the relationship between culture and literature. It aims at explaining the relationship. This research paper also aims at evaluating the degree of influence between them. The complexity of the relationship between culture and literature is due to the several factors tied to the meanings and the perception of both terminologies in the field of literature. Since the winds of independence in African countries, African postcolonial critics, scholars and authors attempted to struggle either to resist to the literature of the colonizers with their cultural values as their shields. However this shield has an important impact in their writings. Like his fellow African writers, Chinua Achebe produced an attractive literary work though social issue based, rise cultural issues which explore the deepest backbone of Ibo society. Consequently, Culture and Literature are in complementary relationship in which culture is shaped by literature.

Studies in Literature , 1999

Africa is always a fascinating area to discuss. The history, political structures, art, literature (oral as well as written), values, religions, traditions, and so on are all popular issues of debate. We always hear the Western perspective of what African history essentially is or you might see an academic journal entry done by some anthropologist analyzing African culture. It has been a rare occasion for African literature to impact the conventional literary scene; however, Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart received great reviews from Western critics and is taught to many high school students nationwide in the United States. This belief promotes the false assumption that African literature is recent phenomena or a newborn infant compared to the classical texts of European history. What has yet to be made clear to the Western audience is a true perception of what authentic African literature essentially is. When do we ever hear the voice of the African scholar? The voice of the authentic Africa has been visible for thousands of years, but ignored and shunned by European academics. African authors like Ayi Kwei Armah, Okot p’Bitek, Wole Soyinka, Dambisa Moyo, Théophile Obenga, as well as European historian Adam Hochschild have composed fictional as well as factual narratives highlighting the voice of a people who has been and continues to be oppressed to present day. Within this paper we will discuss the many false assumptions of what African literature truly is, we will highlight the thematic as well as stylistic issues that the African author faces in our contemporary world today, and finally we will discuss the true vision of the African author and righteous Western critic providing the correct lens to analysis this art form.

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

Canadian Review of Comparative Literature Revue Canadienne De Litterature Comparee, 2011

Creative Flight Journal, 2022

ARIEL: A Review of International English …, 1994

Ansu Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 2020

African Studies Review, 1992

Cajetan Iheka's Naturalizing Africa, 2018

Journal of Arts and Humanities, 2014

Related topics

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024