Oral Presentation | |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The speaker demonstrates thorough knowledge of medieval character including information on daily life, religion, health, job, hardships, and duties. |
The speaker demonstrates adequate knowledge of medieval character. |
The speaker demonstrates some knowledge of medieval character. |
The speaker demonstrates little or no knowledge. |
|
Props are historically accurate and reflective of the medieval time period. The visual materials greatly enhance the presentation and increase understanding of the historical character. |
Props are historically accurate to the medieval time period. The visual materials add to the presentation, but do not necessarily increase the understanding of the historical character. |
Props are used but are not specifically reflective of the medieval time period. The props do not necessarily increase the understanding of the historical character. |
Props are used but are not historically accurate. |
|
The speaker uses first person perspective the entire time, always using pronouns like I, me, we, our. It sounds like they are the medieval character. |
The speaker uses first person perspective most of the time, with only an occasional slip out of character. They still sound like they are the medieval character. |
The speaker slips in and out of character sometimes using first person perspective, and sometimes referring to the character as someone else. |
The speaker is rarely in character, and sounds like he/she is giving a report on someone else instead of being that character. |
|
Every spoken word can be heard and understood clearly with no difficulty by each person in the audience. The speaker uses a variety of volume modulations (louder/softer), voice inflections (tone of voice), gestures, and facial expressions to convey enthusiasm or energy. |
A very brief portion of the talk may be unclear or inaudible to some members of the audience. The speaker makes some effort to be expressive to the audience. |
Several parts of the talk are unclear or inaudible to some members of the audience. For the most part, the tone is lifeless or inappropriate. |
Most of the talk is unclear or inaudible to most of the audience. Talk is flat. Voice is consistently a monotone. Little or no energy is used to convey feelings. |
|
Talk moves at natural rate and rhythm. There are no inappropriate pauses or silences. |
Talk is slightly hurried or slow. There may be occasional gaps that do not detract very much from the meaning. |
Talk is somewhat hurried or sluggish throughout OR there are several noticeable pauses in an otherwise well-paced talk. |
Talk is noticeably rushed or protracted OR there are several lengthy pauses in the talk. |
|
The presentation seems well rehearsed with occasional looks to cue cards or notes but without losing contact with the audience. |
The presentation seems rehearsed for the most part with some extended looks at cue cards or notes. |
The presentation did not appear to have been rehearsed, and lines were mostly read from cue cards or notes to the audience. |
The presentation was unprepared with no attempt to deliver a quality presentation. |
No Alignments yet.
Get our mega Halloween worksheets bundle! 👻
In the end, they actually make grading easier.
When it comes to student assessment and evaluation, there are a lot of methods to consider. In some cases, testing is the best way to assess a student’s knowledge, and the answers are either right or wrong. But often, assessing a student’s performance is much less clear-cut. In these situations, a scoring rubric is often the way to go, especially if you’re using standards-based grading . Here’s what you need to know about this useful tool, along with lots of rubric examples to get you started.
In the United States, a rubric is a guide that lays out the performance expectations for an assignment. It helps students understand what’s required of them, and guides teachers through the evaluation process. (Note that in other countries, the term “rubric” may instead refer to the set of instructions at the beginning of an exam. To avoid confusion, some people use the term “scoring rubric” instead.)
A rubric generally has three parts:
Rubrics take more time to develop up front, but they help ensure more consistent assessment, especially when the skills being assessed are more subjective. A well-developed rubric can actually save teachers a lot of time when it comes to grading. What’s more, sharing your scoring rubric with students in advance often helps improve performance . This way, students have a clear picture of what’s expected of them and what they need to do to achieve a specific grade or performance rating.
Learn more about why and how to use a rubric here.
There are three basic rubric categories, each with its own purpose.
Source: Cambrian College
This type of rubric combines all the scoring criteria in a single scale. They’re quick to create and use, but they have drawbacks. If a student’s work spans different levels, it can be difficult to decide which score to assign. They also make it harder to provide feedback on specific aspects.
Traditional letter grades are a type of holistic rubric. So are the popular “hamburger rubric” and “ cupcake rubric ” examples. Learn more about holistic rubrics here.
Source: University of Nebraska
Analytic rubrics are much more complex and generally take a great deal more time up front to design. They include specific details of the expected learning outcomes, and descriptions of what criteria are required to meet various performance ratings in each. Each rating is assigned a point value, and the total number of points earned determines the overall grade for the assignment.
Though they’re more time-intensive to create, analytic rubrics actually save time while grading. Teachers can simply circle or highlight any relevant phrases in each rating, and add a comment or two if needed. They also help ensure consistency in grading, and make it much easier for students to understand what’s expected of them.
Learn more about analytic rubrics here.
Source: Deb’s Data Digest
A developmental rubric is a type of analytic rubric, but it’s used to assess progress along the way rather than determining a final score on an assignment. The details in these rubrics help students understand their achievements, as well as highlight the specific skills they still need to improve.
Developmental rubrics are essentially a subset of analytic rubrics. They leave off the point values, though, and focus instead on giving feedback using the criteria and indicators of performance.
Learn how to use developmental rubrics here.
Ready to create your own rubrics? Find general tips on designing rubrics here. Then, check out these examples across all grades and subjects to inspire you.
These elementary school rubric examples come from real teachers who use them with their students. Adapt them to fit your needs and grade level.
You can use this one as an analytic rubric by counting up points to earn a final score, or just to provide developmental feedback. There’s a second rubric page available specifically to assess prosody (reading with expression).
Learn more: Teacher Thrive
The nice thing about this rubric is that you can use it at any grade level, for any text. If you like this style, you can get a reading fluency rubric here too.
Learn more: Pawprints Resource Center
Rubrics aren’t just for huge projects. They can also help kids work on very specific skills, like this one for improving written responses on assessments.
Learn more: Dianna Radcliffe: Teaching Upper Elementary and More
If you use interactive notebooks as a learning tool , this rubric can help kids stay on track and meet your expectations.
Learn more: Classroom Nook
Use this simple rubric as it is, or tweak it to include more specific indicators for the project you have in mind.
Learn more: Tales of a Title One Teacher
Developmental rubrics are perfect for assessing behavior and helping students identify opportunities for improvement. Send these home regularly to keep parents in the loop.
Learn more: Teachers.net Gazette
In middle school, use rubrics to offer detailed feedback on projects, presentations, and more. Be sure to share them with students in advance, and encourage them to use them as they work so they’ll know if they’re meeting expectations.
Argumentative writing is a part of language arts, social studies, science, and more. That makes this rubric especially useful.
Learn more: Dr. Caitlyn Tucker
Role-plays can be really useful when teaching social and critical thinking skills, but it’s hard to assess them. Try a rubric like this one to evaluate and provide useful feedback.
Learn more: A Question of Influence
Art is one of those subjects where grading can feel very subjective. Bring some objectivity to the process with a rubric like this.
Source: Art Ed Guru
You can use diorama projects in almost any subject, and they’re a great chance to encourage creativity. Simplify the grading process and help kids know how to make their projects shine with this scoring rubric.
Learn more: Historyourstory.com
Rubrics are terrific for grading presentations, since you can include a variety of skills and other criteria. Consider letting students use a rubric like this to offer peer feedback too.
Learn more: Bright Hub Education
In high school, it’s important to include your grading rubrics when you give assignments like presentations, research projects, or essays. Kids who go on to college will definitely encounter rubrics, so helping them become familiar with them now will help in the future.
Analyze a student’s presentation both for content and communication skills with a rubric like this one. If needed, create a separate one for content knowledge with even more criteria and indicators.
Learn more: Michael A. Pena Jr.
Debate is a valuable learning tool that encourages critical thinking and oral communication skills. This rubric can help you assess those skills objectively.
Learn more: Education World
Implementing project-based learning can be time-intensive, but the payoffs are worth it. Try this rubric to make student expectations clear and end-of-project assessment easier.
Learn more: Free Technology for Teachers
Need an easy way to convert a scoring rubric to a letter grade? This example for essay writing earns students a final score out of 100 points.
Learn more: Learn for Your Life
If you’re unsure how to grade a student’s participation and performance in drama class, consider this example. It offers lots of objective criteria and indicators to evaluate.
Learn more: Chase March
Plus, 25 of the best alternative assessment ideas ..
There's a difference between regular projects and true-project based learning. Continue Reading
Copyright © 2024. All rights reserved. 5335 Gate Parkway, Jacksonville, FL 32256
A rubric is a scoring tool that identifies the different criteria relevant to an assignment, assessment, or learning outcome and states the possible levels of achievement in a specific, clear, and objective way. Use rubrics to assess project-based student work including essays, group projects, creative endeavors, and oral presentations.
Rubrics can help instructors communicate expectations to students and assess student work fairly, consistently and efficiently. Rubrics can provide students with informative feedback on their strengths and weaknesses so that they can reflect on their performance and work on areas that need improvement.
Best practices, moodle how-to guides.
The first step in the rubric creation process is to analyze the assignment or assessment for which you are creating a rubric. To do this, consider the following questions:
Types of rubrics: holistic, analytic/descriptive, single-point
Holistic Rubric. A holistic rubric includes all the criteria (such as clarity, organization, mechanics, etc.) to be considered together and included in a single evaluation. With a holistic rubric, the rater or grader assigns a single score based on an overall judgment of the student’s work, using descriptions of each performance level to assign the score.
Advantages of holistic rubrics:
Disadvantages of holistic rubrics:
Analytic/Descriptive Rubric . An analytic or descriptive rubric often takes the form of a table with the criteria listed in the left column and with levels of performance listed across the top row. Each cell contains a description of what the specified criterion looks like at a given level of performance. Each of the criteria is scored individually.
Advantages of analytic rubrics:
Disadvantages of analytic rubrics:
Single-Point Rubric . A single-point rubric is breaks down the components of an assignment into different criteria, but instead of describing different levels of performance, only the “proficient” level is described. Feedback space is provided for instructors to give individualized comments to help students improve and/or show where they excelled beyond the proficiency descriptors.
Advantages of single-point rubrics:
Disadvantage of analytic rubrics: Requires more work for instructors writing feedback
You might Google, “Rubric for persuasive essay at the college level” and see if there are any publicly available examples to start from. Ask your colleagues if they have used a rubric for a similar assignment. Some examples are also available at the end of this article. These rubrics can be a great starting point for you, but consider steps 3, 4, and 5 below to ensure that the rubric matches your assignment description, learning objectives and expectations.
Make a list of the knowledge and skills are you measuring with the assignment/assessment Refer to your stated learning objectives, the assignment instructions, past examples of student work, etc. for help.
Helpful strategies for defining grading criteria:
Most ratings scales include between 3 and 5 levels. Consider the following questions when designing your rating scale:
Artificial Intelligence tools like Chat GPT have proven to be useful tools for creating a rubric. You will want to engineer your prompt that you provide the AI assistant to ensure you get what you want. For example, you might provide the assignment description, the criteria you feel are important, and the number of levels of performance you want in your prompt. Use the results as a starting point, and adjust the descriptions as needed.
For a single-point rubric , describe what would be considered “proficient,” i.e. B-level work, and provide that description. You might also include suggestions for students outside of the actual rubric about how they might surpass proficient-level work.
For analytic and holistic rubrics , c reate statements of expected performance at each level of the rubric.
Well-written descriptions:
Create your rubric in a table or spreadsheet in Word, Google Docs, Sheets, etc., and then transfer it by typing it into Moodle. You can also use online tools to create the rubric, but you will still have to type the criteria, indicators, levels, etc., into Moodle. Rubric creators: Rubistar , iRubric
Prior to implementing your rubric on a live course, obtain feedback from:
Try out your new rubric on a sample of student work. After you pilot-test your rubric, analyze the results to consider its effectiveness and revise accordingly.
Above Average (4) | Sufficient (3) | Developing (2) | Needs improvement (1) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
(Thesis supported by relevant information and ideas | The central purpose of the student work is clear and supporting ideas always are always well-focused. Details are relevant, enrich the work. | The central purpose of the student work is clear and ideas are almost always focused in a way that supports the thesis. Relevant details illustrate the author’s ideas. | The central purpose of the student work is identified. Ideas are mostly focused in a way that supports the thesis. | The purpose of the student work is not well-defined. A number of central ideas do not support the thesis. Thoughts appear disconnected. |
(Sequencing of elements/ ideas) | Information and ideas are presented in a logical sequence which flows naturally and is engaging to the audience. | Information and ideas are presented in a logical sequence which is followed by the reader with little or no difficulty. | Information and ideas are presented in an order that the audience can mostly follow. | Information and ideas are poorly sequenced. The audience has difficulty following the thread of thought. |
(Correctness of grammar and spelling) | Minimal to no distracting errors in grammar and spelling. | The readability of the work is only slightly interrupted by spelling and/or grammatical errors. | Grammatical and/or spelling errors distract from the work. | The readability of the work is seriously hampered by spelling and/or grammatical errors. |
The audience is able to easily identify the central message of the work and is engaged by the paper’s clear focus and relevant details. Information is presented logically and naturally. There are minimal to no distracting errors in grammar and spelling. : The audience is easily able to identify the focus of the student work which is supported by relevant ideas and supporting details. Information is presented in a logical manner that is easily followed. The readability of the work is only slightly interrupted by errors. : The audience can identify the central purpose of the student work without little difficulty and supporting ideas are present and clear. The information is presented in an orderly fashion that can be followed with little difficulty. Grammatical and spelling errors distract from the work. : The audience cannot clearly or easily identify the central ideas or purpose of the student work. Information is presented in a disorganized fashion causing the audience to have difficulty following the author’s ideas. The readability of the work is seriously hampered by errors. |
Advanced (evidence of exceeding standards) | Criteria described a proficient level | Concerns (things that need work) |
---|---|---|
Criteria #1: Description reflecting achievement of proficient level of performance | ||
Criteria #2: Description reflecting achievement of proficient level of performance | ||
Criteria #3: Description reflecting achievement of proficient level of performance | ||
Criteria #4: Description reflecting achievement of proficient level of performance | ||
90-100 points | 80-90 points | <80 points |
The city of St. Petersburg, Florida is home to 6 middle schools that are part of the Pinellas County School District , which is ranked 23rd out of 68 districts in the state and has an overall rating of 3 stars out of 5 from SchoolDigger. These schools serve students in grades 6-8 and provide a range of educational opportunities and outcomes.
Among the standout schools in the area, Thurgood Marshall Fundamental is the highest-performing, ranking in the top 25% of Florida middle schools and earning a 4-star rating from SchoolDigger. It boasts particularly strong test scores, with 93% proficiency in Algebra 1, 100% in Geometry, and 81% in Civics. In contrast, Tyrone Middle School and Bay Point Middle School have above-average test scores in certain subjects, but lower overall performance compared to Thurgood Marshall.
Across the district, chronic absenteeism is a significant issue, ranging from 16.5% at Thurgood Marshall to a concerning 47% at Azalea Middle School . Additionally, all the schools have high percentages of students qualifying for free or reduced-price lunch, indicating a high level of economic disadvantage among the student populations. While per-student spending varies, there does not appear to be a clear correlation between spending and performance. The racial diversity of the schools also varies, with Thurgood Marshall being the most balanced and Bay Point Middle School having a majority African American student population.
Tyrone middle school, john hopkins middle school, bay point middle school, meadowlawn middle school, azalea middle school.
School | Students/Teachers | Ranking (2024) | Ranking (2023) | FAST English Language Arts (2024) | FAST Math (2024) | Statewide Science Science (2024) | EOC Algebra 1 (2024) | EOC Geometry (2024) | EOC Civics (2024) | Per Pupil Expenditures (2023) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name | Type | Grades | Address | City | Zip | County | District | Is Charter | Is Magnet | Is Virtual | Is Title I | Phone | Enrollment | Full-time Teachers | Student/ Teacher Ratio | Free/Discounted Lunch Recipients | White | Black | Hispanic | Asian | American Indian | Pacific Islander | Two or More Races | Average Standard Score (2024) | Statewide Rank (2024) | State Percentile (2024) | SchoolDigger Rating (2024) | Average Standard Score (2023) | Statewide Rank (2023) | State Percentile (2023) | Rank Change from Previous Year | FAST English Language Arts 6th Grade | FAST English Language Arts 7th Grade | FAST English Language Arts 8th Grade | FAST Math 6th Grade | FAST Math 7th Grade | FAST Math 8th Grade | Statewide Science Science 8th Grade | EOC Algebra 1 End of Course | EOC Geometry End of Course | EOC Civics End of Course | Per Pupil Expenditures Total | Sub-total from Federal Funds | Sub-total from State/Local Funds |
Public, Magnet | 6-8 | 7855 22nd Ave N | No | Yes | No | Yes | (727) 893-2606 | 678 | 42 | 16.1 | 73.9% | 202 (29.8%) | 332 (49.0%) | 98 (14.5%) | 16 (2.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (0.3%) | 28 (4.1%) | 22.4 | 964 of 1196 public middle schools | 19.4% | 24.3 | 919 of 1177 public middle schools | 21.9% | 45 | 33.0 | 32.0 | 29.0 | 40.0 | 16.0 | 46.0 | 27.0 | 67.0 | 56.0 | $13,305 | $2,276 | $11,029 | |||||||
Public, Magnet | 6-8 | 2151 62nd Ave S | No | Yes | No | No | (727) 724-1442 | 770 | 39 | 19.7 | 69.2% | 136 (17.7%) | 508 (66.0%) | 72 (9.4%) | 16 (2.1%) | 1 (0.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | 37 (4.8%) | 38.3 | 742 of 1196 public middle schools | 38.0% | 29.1 | 852 of 1177 public middle schools | 27.6% | 110 | 43.0 | 39.0 | 44.0 | 51.0 | 22.0 | 58.0 | 38.0 | 69.0 | 70.0 | $10,492 | $1,738 | $8,753 | |||||||
Public | 6-8 | 6050 16th St N | No | No | No | Yes | (727) 570-3097 | 832 | 45 | 18.4 | 69.0% | 377 (45.3%) | 197 (23.7%) | 168 (20.2%) | 39 (4.7%) | 1 (0.1%) | 2 (0.2%) | 48 (5.8%) | 27.5 | 899 of 1196 public middle schools | 24.8% | 27.1 | 884 of 1177 public middle schools | 24.9% | 15 | 33.0 | 29.0 | 30.0 | 59.0 | 16.0 | 42.0 | 37.0 | 57.0 | 56.0 | $11,157 | $2,183 | $8,974 | |||||||
Public, Magnet | 6-8 | 701 16th St S | No | Yes | No | Yes | (727) 893-2400 | 723 | 40 | 18.0 | 66.5% | 216 (29.9%) | 355 (49.1%) | 95 (13.1%) | 14 (1.9%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (0.1%) | 42 (5.8%) | 43.6 | 682 of 1196 public middle schools | 43.0% | 35.2 | 772 of 1177 public middle schools | 34.4% | 90 | 55.0 | 44.0 | 44.0 | 55.0 | 15.0 | 51.0 | 42.0 | 72.0 | 63.0 | $12,321 | $1,509 | $10,812 | |||||||
Public, Magnet | 6-8 | 2375 66th St N | No | Yes | No | Yes | (727) 893-1819 | 847 | 39 | 21.7 | 68.2% | 314 (37.1%) | 222 (26.2%) | 195 (23.0%) | 71 (8.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (0.2%) | 43 (5.1%) | 55.2 | 512 of 1196 public middle schools | 57.2% | 44.7 | 640 of 1177 public middle schools | 45.6% | 128 | 56.0 | 44.0 | 47.0 | 69.0 | 31.0 | 66.0 | 49.0 | 88.0 | 73.0 | $10,305 | $1,642 | $8,663 | |||||||
Public, Magnet | 6-8 | 3901 22nd Ave S | No | Yes | No | No | (727) 522-1737 | 888 | 46 | 19.3 | 46.5% | 365 (41.1%) | 359 (40.4%) | 89 (10.0%) | 32 (3.6%) | 2 (0.2%) | 0 (0.0%) | 41 (4.6%) | 74.1 | 278 of 1196 public middle schools | 76.8% | 70.5 | 318 of 1177 public middle schools | 73.0% | 40 | 65.0 | 71.0 | 68.0 | 60.0 | 17.0 | 73.0 | 66.0 | 93.0 | 100.0 | 81.0 | $9,002 | $756 | $8,247 |
City | Distance | # of Schools | Statewide Rank | Rank (0-5) |
---|---|---|---|---|
0.41 mi | 3 | 47 | ||
3.58 mi | 19 | 179 | ||
3.81 mi | 33 | 268 | ||
3.97 mi | 4 | 379 | ||
6.09 mi | 2 | 260 |
Achieving Excellence
Vision: 100% student success.
Mission: To provide quality education in an inclusive environment that promotes life-long learning and prepares students for college, career and life.
Office Hours: 9:00 AM - 4:30 PM
School Hours: 9:40 AM - 4:10 PM
Phone: (727) 570-3097
Principal: Melissa Athanson
Spirit Shirts are for sale $10; Sweatshirts are $25 (cash payments only)
MMS Sports Tickets
Please look closely before doing your back to school shopping!
If your child is interested in participating in sports this year at Meadowlawn, please fill out the Athletic Participation Packet and turn it in to your grade level office.
5:00 PM Volleyball Thurgood @ MMS 5p (Boys 1st/Girls 2nd)
5:00 PM Volleyball MMS @ Tyrone 5p (Girls 1st/Boys 2nd)
5:00 PM Volleyball MMS @ Pinellas Park 5p (Girls 1st/Boys 2nd)
5:00 PM Volleyball Sanderlin @ MMS 5p (Boys 1st/Girls 2nd)
Online payments.
PCSB Facebook
Meadowlawn Facebook
PCSB Espanol
6050 16th St. N, St. Petersburg, FL 33703-1049
(727) 570-3097
(727) 570-3396
Frequently asked questions.
Frequently asked questions.
COMMENTS
The rubric allows teachers to assess students in several key areas of oral presentation. Students are scored on a scale of 1-4 in three major areas. The first area is Delivery, which includes eye contact, and voice inflection. The second area, Content/Organization, scores students based on their knowledge and understanding of the topic being ...
Oral Presentation Rubric 4—Excellent 3—Good 2—Fair 1—Needs Improvement Delivery • Holds attention of entire audience with the use of direct eye contact, seldom looking at notes • Speaks with fluctuation in volume and inflection to maintain audience interest and emphasize key points • Consistent use of direct eye contact with ...
Rubric for Speeches Subject: This rubric for oral presentations focuses on knowledge of audience, posture and eye contact, word choice, content of speech, use of time, confidence, and sources disclosed. The rubric can be used for any unit that requires oral presentations. Created Date: 5/27/2005 5:09:00 PM
Oral Presentation Rubric. Holds attention of entire audience with the use of direct eye contact, seldom looking at notes. Consistent use of direct eye contact with audience, but still returns to notes. Displayed minimal eye contact with audience, while reading mostly from the notes. No eye contact with audience, as entire report is read from notes.
Oral Presentation Rubric Limited (0 -7 pts.) Emerging (8 15 pts.) Consistent (16 20 pts.) Points possible earned Eye contact Eye contact is rare or limited to part of the audience. Eye contact is occasional or includes only part of the audience. Eye contact is frequent and includes most of audience. 20 Voice Words are not pronounced clearly ...
Use this FREE rubric to provide students with clear expectations for their next oral presentation or speech! Public speaking is difficult for everyone, especially students. Getting up and speaking in front of the class is the last thing many of our students want to do. Help students prepare for their speech or presentation with a clear set of ...
Coffee Lover. This rubric a 5 point scale over the following categories: knowledge of subject matter, communication skills/clarity, poise/confidence, methods of presentation, voice, visual contact, evidence of preparation and orderly sequence. 6 th - 12 th. Life Skills, Oral Communication, Vocational Education. FREE.
Discuss this rubric with other members. Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible. iRubric C576C3: Rubric title Barnhart Middle School Oral Presentation Rubric. <!---. Rubric possible points is 0. --->Built by mkinard using iRubric.com. Free rubric builder and assessment tools.
This Rubric can be used for all oral presentations for year 1 and 2 students, based on the ACARA and SCSA Judging standards. Rubric has marks allocated for easy data collection and tracking purposes. Also has a section for student feedback. K - 2 nd. Balanced Literacy, English Language Arts, Oral Communication.
Medieval Times Character Oral Presentation Rubric - Middle School. Created Feb. 7, 2024 by Lara Ervin-Kassab. 4. 3. 2. 1. Knowledge of medieval character. The speaker demonstrates thorough knowledge of medieval character including information on daily life, religion, health, job, hardships, and duties. The speaker demonstrates adequate ...
Students will have 15 minutes to make your presentation. Evaluate students using the rubric provided in Task 1. Several employees of Apex, Inc., where you are a management trainee, have requested that all employees' cultural traditions be included in holiday celebrations. Prepare a survey to determine the various celebrations of the employees.
Oral Presentation Evaluation Rubric, Formal Setting . PRESENTER: Non-verbal skills (Poise) 5 4 3 2 1 Comfort Relaxed, easy presentation with minimal hesitation Generally comfortable appearance, occasional hesitation Somewhat comfortable appearance, some hesitation Generally uncomfortable, difficulty with flow of presentation Completely
Oral Presentation Rubric : Peer Teaching Teacher Name: Mr. Baker Student Name: _____ CATEGORY 4 3 2 1 Key Terms All of the key terms from the section are identified and defined. Some of the key terms from the section are identified and defined. A few of the key terms from the section are identified
EDITABLE Oral Presentation Rubric Print & Google Slides™ BUNDLE Middle School. Even if you have to do oral presentations over video call on Google Meet™ or Zoom™, the Common Core asks teachers to assess students' abilities with speaking and listening, including giving in-class presentations. When you incorporate public speaking into your ...
Group Oral Presentation Rubric. All group members participate equally. All group members participate. Some group members participate. Only 1 or 2 group members participate. Group members help each other as needed. Group members help each other as needed. Some group members speak clearly and are easy to understand.
In middle school, use rubrics to offer detailed feedback on projects, presentations, and more. Be sure to share them with students in advance, and encourage them to use them as they work so they'll know if they're meeting expectations. ... Oral Presentation Rubric. Rubrics are terrific for grading presentations, since you can include a ...
Step 7: Create your rubric. Create your rubric in a table or spreadsheet in Word, Google Docs, Sheets, etc., and then transfer it by typing it into Moodle. You can also use online tools to create the rubric, but you will still have to type the criteria, indicators, levels, etc., into Moodle.
Browse middle school oral presnetation rubric resources on Teachers Pay Teachers, a marketplace trusted by millions of teachers for original educational resources.
Among the standout schools in the area, Thurgood Marshall Fundamental is the highest-performing, ranking in the top 25% of Florida middle schools and earning a 4-star rating from SchoolDigger. It boasts particularly strong test scores, with 93% proficiency in Algebra 1, 100% in Geometry, and 81% in Civics. In contrast, Tyrone Middle School and ...
Welcome to Meadowlawn Middle School. Vision: 100% student success. Mission: To provide quality education in an inclusive environment that promotes life-long learning and prepares students for college, career and life. Office Hours: 9:00 AM - 4:30 PM. School Hours: 9:40 AM - 4:10 PM.
Pre-K (25) Charter (4) For the 2024-25 school year, there are 12 public middle schools serving 7,963 students in Saint Petersburg, FL. The top ranked public middle schools in Saint Petersburg, FL are Madeira Beach Fundamental K-8, Thurgood Marshall Fundamental and Plato Of St.petersburg. Overall testing rank is based on a school's combined math ...
The top ranked private schools in Saint Petersburg, FL include Shorecrest Preparatory School, Canterbury School Of Florida and Admiral Farragut Academy. The average tuition cost is $13,065, which is higher than the Florida private school average tuition cost of $10,997. 70% of private schools in Saint Petersburg, FL are religiously affiliated ...
Products. $11.20 $14.00 Save $2.80. View Bundle. EDITABLE Oral Presentation Rubric Print & Google Slides™ BUNDLE Middle School. Even if you have to do oral presentations over video call on Google Meet™ or Zoom™, the Common Core asks teachers to assess students' abilities with speaking and listening, including giving in-class presentations.