paper airplanes research

For New Insights into Aerodynamics, Scientists Turn to Paper Airplanes

A series of experiments using paper airplanes reveals new aerodynamic effects--findings that enhance our understanding of flight stability.

Findings Unveil Mechanisms that Explain Flight Stability

A series of experiments using paper airplanes reveals new aerodynamic effects, a team of scientists has discovered. Its findings enhance our understanding of flight stability and could inspire new types of flying robots and small drones.

“The study started with simple curiosity about what makes a good paper airplane and specifically what is needed for smooth gliding,” explains Leif Ristroph, an associate professor at New York University’s Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences and an author of the study , which appears in the Journal of Fluid Mechanics . “Answering such basic questions ended up being far from child’s play. We discovered that the aerodynamics of how paper airplanes keep level flight is really very different from the stability of conventional airplanes.”

“Birds glide and soar in an effortless way, and paper airplanes, when tuned properly, can also glide for long distances,” adds author Jane Wang, a professor of engineering and physics at Cornell University. “Surprisingly, there has been no good mathematical model for predicting this seemingly simple but subtle gliding flight.”

Since we can make complicated modern airplanes fly, the researchers say, one might think we know all there is to know about the simplest flying machines. 

“But paper airplanes, while simple to make, involve surprisingly complex aerodynamics,” notes Ristroph.

The paper’s authors began their study by considering what is needed for a plane to glide smoothly. Since paper airplanes have no engine and rely on gravity and proper design for their movement, they are good candidates for exploring factors behind flight stability.

To investigate this phenomenon, the researchers conducted lab experiments by launching paper airplanes with differing centers of mass through the air. The results, along with those from studying plates falling in a water tank, allowed the team to devise a new aerodynamic model and also a “flight simulator” capable of predicting the motions.

A video and image showing the experimental results may be downloaded from Google Drive .

To find the best design, the researchers placed different amounts of thin copper tape on the front part of the paper planes, giving them varied center of mass locations. Lead weights added to the plates in water served the same purpose.

“The key criterion of a successful glider is that the center of mass must be in the ‘just right’ place,” Ristroph explains. “Good paper airplanes achieve this with the front edge folded over several times or by an added paper clip, which requires a little trial and error.”

In the experiments, the researchers found that the flight motions depended sensitively on the center of mass location. Specifically, if the weight was at the center of the wing or only displaced somewhat from the middle, it underwent wild motions, such as fluttering or tumbling. If the weight was displaced too far toward one edge, then the flier quickly dove downwards and crashed. In between, however, there was a “sweet spot” for the center of mass that gave stable gliding.

The researchers coupled the experimental work with a mathematical model that served as the basis of a “flight simulator,” a computer program that successfully reproduced the different flight motions. It also helped explain why a paper airplane is stable in its glide. When the center of mass is in the “sweet spot,” the aerodynamic force on the plane’s wing pushes the wing back down if the plane moves upward and back up if it moves downward.

“The location of the aerodynamic force or center of pressure varies with the angle of flight in such a way to ensure stability,” explains Ristroph. 

He notes that this dynamic does not occur with conventional aircraft wings, which are airfoils—structures whose shapes work to generate lift. 

“The effect we found in paper airplanes does not happen for the traditional airfoils used as aircraft wings, whose center of pressure stays fixed in place across the angles that occur in flight,” Ristroph says. “The shifting of the center of pressure thus seems to be a unique property of thin, flat wings, and this ends up being the secret to the stable flight of paper airplanes.”

“This is why airplanes need a separate tail wing as a stabilizer while a paper plane can get away with just a main wing that gives both lift and stability,” he concludes. “We hope that our findings will be useful in small-scale flight applications, where you may want a minimal design that does not require a lot of extra flight surfaces, sensors, and controllers.”

The paper’s other authors were Huilin Li, a doctoral candidate at NYU Shanghai, and Tristan Goodwill, a doctoral candidate at the Courant Institute’s Department of Mathematics.

The work was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (DMS-1847955, DMS-1646339).

Press Contact

an analogy for every complexity

The science behind paper airplanes.

• Explanations

15 Comments

Have you ever thrown a paper airplane? How did it fly? Paper airplanes vary widely in design, and those differences lead to meaningful differences in the way that they fly. Some airplanes fly quickly through the air, while others glide slowly. Sometimes, a paper airplane will tip its nose upward, leading to a stall. Why do these things happen?

The mechanics of paper airplanes are interesting because they are similar to those of most things that move quickly through the air. They have four basic forces acting on them:

via auntannie.com

The thrust comes from you when you throw the plane. Thus, the plane has no thrust in flight. The reason it doesn’t continue to slow down during flight is because it is also falling, “converting” its potential energy into thrust as it falls.

The lift comes from the difference in air pressure above and below the wing. This is caused by the shape of the wing, known as an airfoil. Lift is proportional to the size of the wing and the square of the speed of the plane.

So how do these forces affect how a plane flies? Take for example the standard paper “dart” plane:

via Wikigami

If you have flown this plane before, you know that it flies quickly, but drops to the ground relatively quickly. This can be explained as the plane having little drag, but little lift as well. More specifically, the lift and gravity forces are not perfectly aligned like they are in the first image. Rather, the center of gravity is slightly ahead of the center of lift in this plane, causing it to tip downwards and fly towards the ground.

Another popular plane is this “glider”:

via Instructables

This plane has a slow and steady flight if thrown gently or even dropped from a high place. Even without thrust from the person who throws it, it is able to maintain steady flight, if at the cost of a slight drop at the beginning. This indicates that its gravity and lift forces are aligned correctly. While it does not fly as fast, it has a larger wing surface area, which allows it to get enough lift at lower speeds.

With these ideas in mind, it’s easy to pick the correct airplane for any task. (That’s a common issue people have… right?) I once participated in a paper airplane competition based on longest total flight time. Knowing this, I instantly started folding large-winged gliders. When my plane nosedived too often, I folded it to place less paper in the front half, which moved the center of mass further back to compensate for the nosediving, which led to a steady-flying glider.

I went on to win $20 in that small competition. While, in real life, paper airplanes competitions are few and far between, this knowledge is not useful exclusively in these rare situations. Just to understand the basic mechanics at work in the planes, drones, and squirrel suits of the world is enlightening.

I have made lots of paper airplanes and lots of them failed this is a very detailed way to look at something so simple.

I agre I lyke paper airplanes because they are cool and soemtime I get them to fly. My bike is red and has stuff on the grip bars. What is yoru bike like.

are you in special ed classes?

Why was the necessary? If it was because of a few spelling errors by the previous poster than you don’t have much to talk about as your post had no capital letter at the beginning of your sentence.

Meow fuck out the way.

Come on people show some respect

Thank you for this post Gemlik Zeytin Fidanı

say my name

Heisenberg!

Am using this as research for my Engineering project. Very helpful, thanks!

allauh akbar 💥💥💥

Where’s my cupcake?

there are kids

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Paper Airplanes Plans

A glider is a special kind of aircraft that has no engine. In flight, a glider has three forces acting on it as compared to the four forces that act on a powered aircraft. Both types of aircraft are subjected to the forces of lift, drag, and weight. The powered aircraft has an engine that generates thrust, while the glider has no thrust.

Types of Glider Aircraft

There are many different types of glider aircraft.  Paper airplanes  are the simplest aircraft to build and fly, and students can learn the basics of aircraft motion by flying paper airplanes. Building and flying balsa wood or Styrofoam gliders is an inexpensive way for students to have fun while learning the basics of aerodynamics.  Hang-gliders  are piloted aircraft that are launched by leaping off the side of a hill or by being towed aloft.  Piloted gliders  are launched by ground based catapults, or are towed aloft by a powered aircraft then cut free to glide for hours over many miles. The Wright Brothers perfected the design of the first airplane and gained piloting experience through a series of glider flights from 1900 to 1903. The Space Shuttle flies as a glider during reentry and landing; the rocket engines are used only during liftoff.

On the graphic at the top of this page, there are two paper airplane designs shown: Paper Airplane #1 (PA-1), in blue at the lower right, and Paper Airplane #2 (PA-2), in red at the upper left. Both of these aircraft are constructed by folding an 8 1/2 by 11 sheet of paper. The plans for these aircraft are provided below.

To obtain your own copy of PA-1 click here  and save the Power Point file. Open Power Point and follow the directions written on the aircraft to obtain a two-sided copy of the plans from your printer. The plans will look like this:

Constructing an Aircraft

To construct the aircraft, fold on the solid lines in the prescribed numerical order (1,2,3..) always folding to the inside. Cover the number with the fold. The dashed lines on the plans indicate places to cut with a scissors. The PA-1 is designed to be highly maneuverable and employs both ailerons and a rudder. If both ailerons are turned upward, the aircraft will loop. If one is turned up and the other down, and the rudder is fixed straight, the aircraft will roll. If the rudder is turned, the aircraft will perform a banked turn.

To obtain your own copy of PA-2 click here  and save the Power Point file. Open Power Point and follow the directions written on the aircraft to obtain a two-sided copy of the plans from your printer. The plans will look like this:

To construct the aircraft, fold on the solid lines in the prescribed numerical order (1,2,3..) always folding to the inside. Cover the number with the fold. The PA-2 is designed to fly fast and far.

Students should build and fly both aircraft to learn how differences in design affect the flight performance of an aircraft. After experimenting with paper airplanes, the student is ready to move up to more challenging aircraft such as wooden or Styrofoam gliders.

Thanks for contacting us! We will get in touch with you shortly.

• Mobile Site
• Staff Directory
• Advertise with Ars

Filter by topic

• Biz & IT
• Gaming & Culture

Front page layout

On the eleventh day of Christmas —

Experiments with paper airplanes reveal surprisingly complex aerodynamics, how these gliders keep level flight is different from the stability of airplanes..

Jennifer Ouellette - Jan 4, 2023 10:06 pm UTC

Drop a flat piece of paper and it will flutter and tumble through the air as it falls, but a well-fashioned paper airplane will glide smoothly. Although these structures look simple, their aerodynamics are surprisingly complex. Researchers at New York University’s Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences conducted a series of experiments involving paper airplanes to explore this transition and develop a mathematical model to predict flight stability, according to a March paper published in the Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

“The study started with simple curiosity about what makes a good paper airplane and specifically what is needed for smooth gliding," said co-author Leif Ristroph . "Answering such basic questions ended up being far from child’s play. We discovered that the aerodynamics of how paper airplanes keep level flight is really very different from the stability of conventional airplanes.”

Nobody knows who invented the first paper airplane, but China began making paper on a large scale around 500 BCE, with the emergence of origami and paper-folding as a popular art form between 460 and 390 BCE. Paper airplanes have long been studied as a means of learning more about the aerodynamics of flight. For instance, Leonardo da Vinci famously built a model plane out of parchment while dreaming up flying machines and used paper models to test his design for an ornithopter. In the 19th century, British engineer and inventor Sir George Cayley —sometimes called the "father of aviation"—studied the gliding performance of paper airplanes to design a glider capable of carrying a human.

An amusing "scientist playing with paper planes" anecdote comes from physicist Theodore von Kármán . In his 1967 memoir The Wind and Beyond , he recalled a formal 1924 banquet in Delft, The Netherlands, where fellow physicist Ludwig Prandtl constructed a paper airplane out of a menu to demonstrate the mechanics of flight to von Kármán's sister, who was seated next to him. When he threw the paper plane, "It landed on the shirtfront of the French minister of education, much to the embarrassment of my sister and others at the banquet," von Kármán wrote.

While scientists have clearly made great strides in aerodynamics—particularly about aircraft—Ristroph et al . noted that there was not a good mathematical model for predicting the simpler, subtler gliding flight of paper airplanes. It was already well-known that displacing the center of mass results in various flight trajectories, some more stable than others. “The key criterion of a successful glider is that the center of mass must be in the ‘just right’ place,” said Ristroph . “Good paper airplanes achieve this with the front edge folded over several times or by an added paper clip, which requires a little trial and error.”

reader comments

Channel ars technica.

A Living History of The Humble Paper Airplane

For centuries, paper airplanes have unlocked the science of flight—now they could inspire drone technology.

Shinji Suzuki met Takuo Toda in 1999, atop Mt. Yonami in the southern city of Jinseki-Kogen, Japan. Toda, the chairman of the Japan Origami Airplane Association, was there to launch a large paper plane from a tower he had built on the mountaintop for just that purpose.

Toda persuaded the local city council to build the 85-foot-tall tower—with 360-degree views of Mount Daisen, Mount Dogo, and the Hiba Mountains—as a monument to paper airplane hobbyists. The first floor of the tower includes a showcase of precisely folded paper plane models, while the top floor opens into a veritable launch pad. When Suzuki first met Toda, he was launching the almost-seven-foot-long paper plane —modeled after the space shuttle Discovery —off that very flight deck. “He told me that he would like to launch this paper plane from the space station,” Suzuki, now an emeritus professor in aviation at the University of Tokyo, says. “Everybody laughed at him.”

Toda’s lofty dream inspired Suzuki to take action, and in 2008, the pair announced a project to launch paper airplanes from the International Space Station (ISS). Critics suggested these planes would burn up on their descent back to Earth, Suzuki says. However, he predicted that with a protective coating and a controlled trajectory, they might actually be able to avoid burning up on reentry into Earth’s atmosphere. Another challenge? Figuring out where exactly the planes would land.

While Suzuki plotted the planes’ journey to the ISS, Toda would chart another path, racking up Guinness World Records for his paper airplane designs . For decades, he’s aimed to break the 30-second record for time aloft of a paper plane. He’s come close multiple times.

At a Japan Airlines hangar near Tokyo’s Haneda Airport in 2009, Toda sent a paper plane soaring for a whopping 26.1 seconds. And he holds the current time aloft record, which he set in 2010 with a rectangular design that lingered in the air for an astonishing 29.2 seconds. There are other records to be broken, too. As of April 2023, a trio of aerospace engineers currently hold the title for longest-distance throw of a paper airplane. Their dart-shaped plane traveled 289 feet and 9 inches, beating the previous record by almost 40 feet.

Our obsession with testing the boundaries of folded flight is relatively recent, but our desire to explore and explain the complex world of aerodynamics goes back much further.

Chinese engineers are thought to have invented what could be considered the earliest paper planes around 2,000 years ago. But these ancient gliders, usually crafted from bamboo and paper or linen, resembled kites more than the dart-shaped fliers that have earned numerous Guinness World Records in recent years.

Leonardo da Vinci would take a step closer to the modern paper airplane in the late 14th and early 15th centuries by building paper models of his aircraft designs to assess how they might sustain flight. But da Vinci’s knowledge of aerodynamics was fairly limited. He was more inspired by animal flight and, as a result, his design for craft like the ornithopter—a hang-glider-​size set of bat wings that used mechanical systems powered by human movement—never left the ground.

Paper airplanes helped early engineers and scientists learn about the mechanics of flight. The British engineer and aviator Sir George Cayley reportedly crafted the first folded paper plane to approach modern specifications in the early 1800s as part of his personal experimentation with aerodynamics. “He was one of the early people to link together the idea that the lift from the wings picking up the aircraft for stable flight must be greater than or equal to the weight of the aircraft,” says Jonathan Ridley , PhD, the head of engineering and a scholar of early aviation at Solent University in the U.K.

“Over the last 20 years, there’s been an increasing interest in smaller-scale flight.”

More than a century later, before their famous 1903 flight in Kitty Hawk, North Carolina, the Wright Brothers built paper models of wings to better understand how their glider would sustain flight, explains Ridley. They then tested these models in a rudimentary, refrigerator-size wind tunnel—only the second to be built in the U.S.

Paper planes are still illuminating the hidden wonders of flight. Today, these lightweight aircraft serve as a source of inspiration not only for aviation enthusiasts but also for fluid dynamicists and engineers studying the complex effects of air on small aircraft like drones.

At Cornell University, in a lab run by physics professor Jane Wang , PhD, paper gliders plunge, swoop, and flutter through the air. What might look like child’s play to the untrained eye is actually part of a serious experiment conducted by Wang and her colleague Leif Ristroph , PhD, an associate professor of mathematics at New York University. Once the planes land, Wang and Ristroph analyze data from their flight and apply weights to change the balance of these gliders. They hope doing so will help them better understand how lightweight objects soar—something that could one day inform the future of miniature drones and other robotic craft.

The team’s most recent study, published in the Journal of Fluid Mechanics in February 2022 , explored the mechanics of gliding and identified new ways for paper gliders to achieve stable flight. Insights gleaned from this research have practical applications, but they also shed light on the aerodynamic principles that keep paper airplanes thrown by enthusiasts up in the air. All planes —powered and unpowered —are controlled by the four forces of flight: lift, weight, thrust, and drag. Lift is the aerodynamic force produced by the forward motion of an object through a fluid—in this case, air. Weight, or the force of gravity, is the opposing force and pulls the airplane toward Earth. Where the engines or propellers on a passenger aircraft generate thrust, the force of a paper plane pilot’s throw gives the aircraft the forward momentum. Drag, caused by the friction a plane experiences as it moves through the air, acts in opposition to thrust.

Traditional airplanes have airfoil-shaped wings with a round leading edge. Air that passes over the wing conforms to its shape. Air flowing above the wing moves faster than air below the wing, forming a low-pressure zone above the wing that generates lift.

“The magic of a paper airplane is that all of these little flight corrections are happening continuously throughout its flight.”

But the wing of a paper glider is flat, and air does not flow smoothly around it. Instead, that air forms a small, low-pressure vortex immediately above the leading edge of the wing. “This little vortex ends up changing a lot of the aerodynamic characteristics of the plane,” Ristroph says. “One thing it does is give the plane a natural stability, meaning that, in principle, it can and will glide.”

As the angle at which a glider’s wing cuts through the air—known as the angle of attack—changes, so too does the size and location of the vortex above the wing. This affects where the center of pressure, or the precise location where lift is focused, lies along the wing and how responsive it is to disturbances. If, for example, the plane encounters a gust that pushes its nose down, the center of pressure will slide forward, pushing the nose back up and into a stable position.

“The magic of a paper airplane is that all of these little flight corrections are happening continuously throughout its flight,” Ristroph says. “The plane is hanging under a vortex that is constantly swelling and shrinking in just the right ways to keep a smooth and level glide.”

The center of pressure for an airfoil, however, is locked in place and does not change with the angle of attack. This means it has trouble self-correcting if destabilized. Ristroph says the team tested this in some of their experiments by folding the sheets into an airfoil. These sheets quickly crashed after brief, erratic flights because they could not stabilize after being perturbed.

This phenomenon changes at different scales, Ristroph adds. For instance, if you were to construct a paper plane the size of a Boeing 747 , the vortex above the wing would be much larger and behave differently. “That vortex would not just stay on the plane and sit there, it would jump off, reform again, and do something a little turbulent and a little crazy,” he says. “You might not be able to rely on that vortex to give you stability because it may not always be there.” Conversely, if you created a paper airplane less than, say, a millimeter long, the aerodynamics would change—along with the behavior of that vortex.

The central focus of Ristroph and Wang’s work—and, as their research suggests, the true secret to a stable glide—is identifying and making adjustments based on a glider’s center of balance. The center of balance lies at the point where a plane would be perfectly balanced if suspended in midair. (You can locate the center of balance on a paper airplane by balancing it between the tips of your thumb and forefinger.) For an unfolded sheet of paper like the ones Wang and Ristroph tested, the center of balance is directly in the middle of the page.

The team experimented with tweaking the center of balance by placing strips of copper tape on their paper gliders and studying their flight. If the weights were placed too close to the center of the sheet, the gliders would tumble uncontrollably to the ground. If the weights were placed too far forward, they would immediately nose-dive.

“People can make very, very good paper airplanes now,” Wang says. “It’s a fine art. They build their intuition by making them.”

Through trial and error, they discovered that placing these weights halfway between the middle of the sheet and the leading edge created a stable glide, meaning that even if the glider was disturbed during its flight, it would still be able to right itself. Wang says this discovery was particularly surprising because previous work done on this topic had only ever identified “neutrally stable” modes of flight, which become unstable if perturbed and cannot self-correct.

Ristroph hopes the findings from their work will help engineers design new types of small aircraft that take advantage of passive modes of flight like, say, windsurfing craft that sail high above cities to monitor air quality. “Over the last 20 years, there’s been increasing interest in smaller-scale flight,” Ristroph says. “Small-scale flying robots [could] do things like ride on the wind rather than having some kind of engine or spinning rotors like a helicopter.”

The push to develop low-cost and low-impact alternatives to traditional aircraft has grown in recent decades. For example, in 2017 the San Francisco–based research and development firm Otherlab announced it had won a grant from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) to work on a lightweight cardboard glider that could someday deliver blood, vaccines, or other critical cargo to remote locations inaccessible via other modes of transportation.

The gliders, constructed from flat-packed pieces of cardboard, would be released from an airplane and, with the help of an onboard computer, navigate to a preprogrammed set of coordinates. Otherlab and DARPA shelved the project, but the central idea—tapping into the realm of unpowered flight to solve difficult problems—lives on.

Future small aircraft may also veer away from mimicking airplanes altogether, Wang says. In addition to studying paper gliders, much of her research focuses on forms of passive flight and gliding we already find in nature, such as insects and seeds that twirl off tree limbs. Using these techniques to create small craft could create even more possibilities in years to come.

Even after locating a glider’s center of mass, Wang cautions that this discovery won’t necessarily make solving future problems facing paper craft experts or engineers any easier. She and colleagues are attempting to solve these problems mathematically. Applying these mathematical revelations to a working glider? Well, that’s another challenge entirely.

Paper airplane enthusiasts, she suggests, might have better luck crafting gliders using intuition and experimentation instead. “People can make very, very good paper airplanes now,” Wang says. “It’s a fine art. They build their intuition by making them.”

Suzuki, Toda, and their collaborators spent 18 months testing multiple designs. They coated each plane in a protective glasslike substance that would raise the heat resistance but still allow for crisp, complex folds. With this design, Suzuki hoped that they might be able to test applications for other small-scale reentry vehicles.

The team then tested a prototype glider in the University of Tokyo’s hypersonic wind tunnel, subjecting the plane to speeds as high as Mach 7 and temperatures of almost 450°F—conditions similar to those a paper plane might face when reentering Earth’s atmosphere.

With these tests under their belt, the team reached out to Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, who agreed to fund the project. One of the agency’s astronauts, Koichi Wakata, even expressed interest in launching them from the orbiting outpost himself. Ultimately, due to budget cuts, Suzuki and Toda’s paper planes never made it to space.

As researchers explore the field of aerodynamics, and new technology continues to model this type of flight, there’s still a chance we could see paper gliders pushing boundaries in years to come.

Weird Ways to Generate Lift

Here’s how strangely shaped objects—from Frisbees to honeybees—generate lift to soar through the air.

→ The lift produced by a Frisbee as it flies through the air is similar to the lift generated by an airplane’s wings. The perfect throw helps the disc push air downward without generating too much drag. In return, air pushes the Frisbee back up, generating additional lift. In 2005, researchers at MIT calculated the ideal throw angle for a Frisbee—12 degrees—to achieve maximum distance. (While the disc may travel greater heights with a larger angle, drag will shorten the distance traveled.)

Helicopter Seeds

→ The maple tree’shelicopter-like seeds, called samara, are specifically designed to fall and spin long distances away from the large, shady canopies of their parent trees. Their long, sail-like wings help balance the weight of the asymmetrical seeds. As the seed spins, the wider end of the wing moves faster than the air closer to the seed, generating lift to keep it airborne. Veins along the wing’s edge create turbulence, forming a small vortex above the wing that reduces pressure and generates even more lift.

→ Birds rely on their airfoil-shaped wings to generate enough lift force to equal and surpass their weight. But different types of birds rely on different modes of flight to generate lift force. (Hummingbirds hover thanks to a vortex that forms above their flapping wings.) Birds generate thrust by flapping their wings in a figure-eight motion. On the downstroke, air hits the bottom of the wing and is deflected past the bird, propelling it forward. Increasing the depth of each wingstroke increases airspeed and lifts the bird.

→ Bees have two sets of wings that they use to generate lift. As a bee rotates its wings back and forth, a small vortex forms above the wings’ leading edge, creating the lift force needed to keep the bee aloft. These soft and malleable wings move incredibly quickly, too, up to 230 beats per second. Compared to other insects of their size, this wingbeat is unusually fast. A fruit fly, for instance, is one eightieth the size of a honeybee and flaps its wings only 200 beats per second.

Sarah is a science and technology journalist based in Boston interested in how innovation and research intersect with our daily lives. She has written for a number of national publications and covers innovation news at Inverse .

Jennifer Leman is a science journalist and senior features editor at Popular Mechanics, Runner's World, and Bicycling. A graduate of the Science Communication Program at UC Santa Cruz, her work has appeared in The Atlantic, Scientific American, Science News and Nature. Her favorite stories illuminate Earth's many wonders and hazards.

How to Buy and Fly Your First Hobbyist Drone

Fold Our Magazine Cover Into a Paper Airplane

How the CIA's Secretive Dragonfly Spy Works

The Drones That Track Down Buried Warheads

This AI Software Helps Drones Save Lives

Police Drone Finds Fugitive Living in a Cave

What Happens When a Drone Crashes Into Your Face?

Japan Tests New Flying Car Prototype

This Is Amazon's New Hexagonal Drone

This Drone Transport Is Powered By Hydrogen Fuel

The Best Solar Drones That Are Filling the Skies

New Lithium Metal Battery Powers Drones for Longer

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS. A lock ( Lock Locked padlock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Cool Science: Paper airplanes, insect wings and the future of tiny drones

Conduct your own aerodynamics experiment at home

For nearly 200 years, in the great pursuit of knowledge about aerodynamics, researchers have been fascinated by paper airplanes. Even the simplest design – a plain sheet of paper with no wings or fins, nothing resembling a modern airplane – can provide insights into complex aerodynamic principles.

A rectangular sheet of paper will tumble to the ground like confetti, but adding just the right amount of weight, in just the right location, affects how the paper flies.

Leif Ristroph, an associate professor at New York University and self-described paper airplane fanatic, said the idea to study the aerodynamics of a falling sheet of paper began with curiosity about the movement.

“The magic that makes a paper airplane glide and not flutter is how you weight it. You don’t need all the other aspects,” Ristroph said. “It feels like someone must have observed this before because it seems so basic but I couldn’t find it. It’s worth understanding, then.”

And while designing a passenger airplane that resembles a sheet of paper is a horrible idea, he said, the research could contribute to new ways of thinking about the design of simple aircraft such as tiny drones.

Observations in air and water

Researchers added strips of metallic tape to one of the long edges of a rectangular sheet to create varying degrees of front weight. When dropped, each sheet moves in a unique way. “There is kind of a magic spot for the balance point where you can get the best glide. If the balance point is too close to the middle, you will see fluttering and tumbling motions. If the balance point is too far forward, it will nose-dive and crash. The best point is about halfway between the middle of the sheet and the front edge. Then you will see a nice glider,” Ristroph said.

Part of Ristroph’s work for his doctorate in physics was studying insect flight and how flapping wings affect flight control and stability. The paper airplane study was not part of his planned research under a U.S. National Science Foundation grant , but the relationship between insect wings and falling paper stood out, and the results contribute to a more general understanding of animal flight and swimming dynamics.

Plus, sheets of paper are easier to maintain in the laboratory than insects, he said.

Ristroph also made observations using a water tank and thin plates of plastic, whose “flight” through water (video above) are governed by the same physics that determines the motions of paper falling through the air. In both instances, the rate and control of the fall was affected by the location of the weight and the impact it had on the center of mass. There is a “sweet spot” for the center of mass that produces a stable glide path.

Based on the results, Ristroph and his team created a mathematical model that serves as the basis of a “flight simulator,” a computer program that reproduces the different flight motions. No such model had previously existed for predicting gliding flight.

“The simulator can produce the full range of motions accurately. It describes the forces acting on the plate and finds out how the flyers should move based on the forces used in the equation. I think for the scientific community, that will translate well into something useful for everyone involved,” he said.

The findings could also contribute to new design methods for drones. “There are a lot of people working on making very small-scale flying robots. There are even some designs that are passive flyers – not powered – that are modeled on flying plant seeds that twirl like helicopters when they fall.”

These passive drones can be used for projects like air quality monitoring.

“There is an initiative to make small flyers, and at very small scales, simpler is better,” Ristroph said. “When you think about paper airplanes, it doesn’t get much simpler than that. I’m not an engineer who can make a useful flying robot, but I hope our findings will inspire others who can.”

“Studying toys is serious fun. Whether it’s a paper airplane or a spinning top, there is something scientifically valuable in finding out how they work.”

Experiments with aerodynamics at home

Ristroph’s research includes a component dedicated to training STEM students in aspects of modern applied mathematics, emphasizing the connections among modeling, simulation and experimental observation.

And his experiments are simple enough that they can be conducted anywhere. “I like to think of the whole world as a laboratory. There are simple experiments in front of you. The things you see around you are fascinating if you look at them in the right way,” he said.

Want to replicate the experiment at home? The basic materials are a notepad or copy paper about 6 inches long and 2 inches wide that can be folded and tape or paper clips that can be used to add weight.

“Studying toys is serious fun,” Ristroph said. “Whether it’s a paper airplane or a spinning top, there is something scientifically valuable in finding out how they work.”  

About the Author

Related stories.

Beyond DNA: How scientists are learning to control gene function

NSF 101: EPSCoR Graduate Fellowship Program

Mobile video game submerges users into ocean depths

Futurity is your source of research news from leading universities.

• About Futurity
• Universities
• Environment

Paper airplanes show off new aerodynamic effects

Since we can make complicated modern airplanes fly, one might think we know all there is to know about the simplest flying machines. "But paper airplanes, while simple to make, involve surprisingly complex aerodynamics," says Leif Ristroph. (Credit: Jeremy Bezanger/Unsplash )

You are free to share this article under the Attribution 4.0 International license.

• aerodynamics

A series of experiments using paper airplanes has revealed new aerodynamic effects, researchers report.

The findings enhance our understanding of flight stability and could inspire new types of flying robots and small drones.

“The study started with simple curiosity about what makes a good paper airplane and specifically what is needed for smooth gliding,” says Leif Ristroph, an associate professor at New York University’s Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences and an author of the study in the Journal of Fluid Mechanics .

“…paper airplanes, while simple to make, involve surprisingly complex aerodynamics.”

“Answering such basic questions ended up being far from child’s play. We discovered that the aerodynamics of how paper airplanes keep level flight is really very different from the stability of conventional airplanes.”

“Birds glide and soar in an effortless way, and paper airplanes, when tuned properly, can also glide for long distances,” says author Jane Wang, a professor of engineering and physics at Cornell University. “Surprisingly, there has been no good mathematical model for predicting this seemingly simple but subtle gliding flight.”

Since we can make complicated modern airplanes fly, the researchers say, one might think we know all there is to know about the simplest flying machines.

“But paper airplanes, while simple to make, involve surprisingly complex aerodynamics,” Ristroph says.

‘Just right’ center of mass

To begin their study, researchers considered what is needed for a plane to glide smoothly. Since paper airplanes have no engine and rely on gravity and proper design for their movement, they are good candidates for exploring factors behind flight stability.

To investigate this phenomenon, the researchers conducted lab experiments by launching paper airplanes with differing centers of mass through the air. The results, along with those from studying plates falling in a water tank, allowed the team to devise a new aerodynamic model and also a “flight simulator” capable of predicting the motions.

To find the best design, the researchers placed different amounts of thin copper tape on the front part of the paper planes, giving them varied center of mass locations. Lead weights added to the plates in water served the same purpose.

“The key criterion of a successful glider is that the center of mass must be in the ‘just right’ place,” Ristroph explains. “Good paper airplanes achieve this with the front edge folded over several times or by an added paper clip, which requires a little trial and error.”

In the experiments, the researchers found that the flight motions depended sensitively on the center of mass location.

Specifically, if the weight was at the center of the wing or only displaced somewhat from the middle, it underwent wild motions, such as fluttering or tumbling. If the weight was displaced too far toward one edge, then the flier quickly dove downwards and crashed. In between, however, there was a “sweet spot” for the center of mass that gave stable gliding.

Aerodynamic ‘sweet spot’

The researchers coupled the experimental work with a mathematical model that served as the basis of a “flight simulator,” a computer program that successfully reproduced the different flight motions. It also helped explain why a paper airplane is stable in its glide.

When the center of mass is in the “sweet spot,” the aerodynamic force on the plane’s wing pushes the wing back down if the plane moves upward and back up if it moves downward.

“The location of the aerodynamic force or center of pressure varies with the angle of flight in such a way to ensure stability,” Ristroph explains.

He notes that this dynamic does not occur with conventional aircraft wings , which are airfoils—structures whose shapes work to generate lift.

“The effect we found in paper airplanes does not happen for the traditional airfoils used as aircraft wings, whose center of pressure stays fixed in place across the angles that occur in flight,” Ristroph says. “The shifting of the center of pressure thus seems to be a unique property of thin, flat wings, and this ends up being the secret to the stable flight of paper airplanes.”

“This is why airplanes need a separate tail wing as a stabilizer while a paper plane can get away with just a main wing that gives both lift and stability,” he says. “We hope that our findings will be useful in small-scale flight applications, where you may want a minimal design that does not require a lot of extra flight surfaces, sensors, and controllers.”

The National Science Foundation supported the work.

Source: NYU

Bird-like morphing wings could stabilize drones in flight

Little bat-winged dinos could glide, but not fly, stay connected. subscribe to our newsletter..

Add your information below to receive daily updates.

• Phone This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

• Science & Technology Strategy
• Air Force Vanguards
• Aerospace Systems
• Information
• Materials & Manufacturing
• Directed Energy
• Human Performance
• Artificial Intelligence
• Hypersonics
• Basic Research
• Digital Capabilities
• Integrated Capabilities
• Cross Domain
• Higher Education
• AFRL Regional Network
• Career Employment
• AFRL Careers Brochure
• Students and Faculty
• AFRL Internship Programs
• Lab Life Podcast
• AFRL Inspire
• AFRL Fellows
• 100 Years of History
• AFRL TECH VLOG
• Not Another Acryonym
• Basic Research Chatter
• Collaboration Programs
• AFRL Fights On!
• 01 TECHNOLOGY
• 02 PARTNER WITH US
• 03 CAREERS AND OPPORTUNITIES
• Partner With Us
• Careers and Opportunities

Paper Airplanes

Learn about the science of flight and then experiment with your own paper airplane models.

Four forces act on an airplane: weight, lift, thrust and drag.

Try these paper airplanes and share creations with #AFRLPaperAirplane on social media.

Right click an image below and select “Save image as” to download and print.

• Current Issue

The Unconventional Aerodynamics of Paper Airplanes

Editor's Note: This article originally appeared in SIAM News on December 05, 2022 ( https://sinews.siam.org/Details-Page/the-unconventional-aerodynamics-of-paper-airplanes ).

Paper airplanes and other flying toys were serious sources of inspiration in the early days of aviation. Although researchers abandoned efforts to understand paper flyers after the emergence of modern aeronautics in the last century, new compelling biological and robotics applications have reawakened interest in the physics of low-speed and small-scale flight. The relevant aerodynamic regime is challenging, but recent progress is coming from mathematical models that explain the intricate motions of falling and flying paper. The latest models and simulations reveal the secrets of a good paper glider, which is less about the design and more about the unusual aerodynamics of thin wings.

Paper is a fascinating flight system. Its aerial repertoire is impressively diverse, from the chaotic flutters and tumbles of confetti to the smooth gliding of a well-crafted paper airplane. The ability of an unassuming object to display such complicated behaviors has attracted the attention of many physicists, mathematicians, and engineers [1, 3, 5-7]. Part of its simple charm comes from its status as a passive flight system that is solely powered by the downward pull of gravity. The surrounding fluid is the only other contributing influence, meaning that the motion’s complexity reflects the complexity of the aerodynamics.

Prior research has primarily focused on the simplest flight system: a rigid, thin plate or sheet. This is the mathematical plane that lends its name to airplane . As such a plate falls through a fluid, diverse aerodynamic conditions lead to a spectrum of interesting motions. This scenario connects to the two-dimensional problem of a thin body moving within a planar domain of fluid, which is the context wherein most modeling advances have occurred [1, 3, 7].

But a simple plate or slip of paper is no glider. Depending on the conditions, a plate may exhibit back-and-forth fluttering, end-over-end tumbling, or chaotic combinations of both motions [1, 3, 5, 7]. These modes and their determining factors have motivated much of the prior research on inherently unsteady or time-varying aerodynamic mechanisms [10]. We recently built upon previous studies to investigate how the unsteady flutters and tumbles of plain paper transform into the steady gliding of a paper plane [4]. A paper airplane’s capability to remain level and fly smoothly is a question of gliding stability. Many factors affect aircraft stability, but the center of mass (CoM)—or the weight’s effective point of action—is one of the most critical [2]. Our investigations indicate that the CoM position is the only essential ingredient in paper airplane stability, since the unusual aerodynamics of thin plates handle everything else [4].

Our story begins with experiments in the Applied Mathematics Laboratory  at New York University’s Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences — though anyone can conduct these tests at home. First, we confirmed that a simple rectangular sheet is capable of gliding flight if the CoM is appropriately located in the fore-aft direction [4]. Our design consists of a rectangle that is cut from standard copy paper, with a thin strip of heavy metallic tape added along the leading edge to shift the CoM forward (see Figure 1a); we are happy to provide interested readers with template files, further instructions, and information about suppliers of the necessary materials. We determined the CoM as the balance point (see Figure 1c) and performed test flights that reveal the aerial tendencies for different CoM positions. Adjustable tabs on the sides of the design help suppress lateral or sideways motion.

Changing the degree of weighting and hence the CoM yields the motions in Figure 1d-1f. This simple flyer can achieve smooth gliding, but only if the CoM is near the quarter-chord point (i.e., halfway between the middle of the plate and its leading edge). A CoM that is too close to the middle leads to tumbling, bounding, and swooping, and one that is too far forward causes nose-down diving.

The “just right” CoM location at the quarter chord may be familiar for some readers based on the theory of thin airfoils, which predicts this same point as the center of pressure or effective location of the aerodynamic forces for thin airfoils at low angles of attack (AoA) [2]. We were therefore surprised to discover that an airfoil cannot glide. Figure 1b depicts the creation of a foil-shaped paper flyer by looping over the front edge. The addition of metallic tape again yields different CoM locations, but test flights resulted in frustration; varied CoM values trigger tumbles, swoops, and dives, but never smooth gliding.

We turn to mathematical modeling to solve the mystery of paper airplane stability. The end goal is a dynamical system that accounts for the evolution of the body’s rotations and translations during free flight. Such a treatment of the aerodynamics is an approximation at best, since the model does not explicitly include the state of the surrounding fluid [1, 7]. Instead, we assume that all aerodynamic forces and torques are expressible as physically informed laws that involve the body’s dynamical state.

Our model consists of the Newton-Euler equations for a rigid body with forcing terms that account for weight and aerodynamic effects like added mass, lift, drag, and their associated torques [4]. It takes the form of a system of coupled nonlinear ordinary differential equations for the translational velocity \((v_{x^\prime},v_{y^\prime})\) in the frame of the plate with orientation angle \(\theta\) and angular velocity \(\omega=\dot \theta\):

\[(m+m_{11}) \dot v_{x^\prime} = (m+m_{22}) \omega v_{y^\prime} - m_{22} \omega^2 \ell_{CM} + L_{x^\prime} + D_{x^\prime} - m ^\prime g \sin \theta,\tag1\]

\[(m+m_{22}) \dot v_{y^\prime} = -(m+m_{11}) \omega v_{x^\prime} + m_{22} \dot \omega \ell_{CM} + L_{y^\prime} + D_{y^\prime} - m^\prime g \cos \theta,\tag2\]

\[(I+I_a) \dot \omega = \tau_T + \tau_R + \tau_B.\tag3\]

The aerodynamic characteristics for a given wing shape are specified within the various terms, e.g., the lift and drag dependencies on speed, angle, and so forth. We solved the model equations numerically via a “flight simulator” code, the output data of which we can reanimate and further analyze.

Figures 2a and 2b compare the simulated flight trajectories for plates or planes versus foils with systematically varied CoMs. The results for a thin plate impressively match all of the behaviors that we observed in experiments on paper planes, thus validating the model [4]. Furthermore, the results for a foil confirm the nonexistence of gliding. In fact, gliding stands out as the unique flight mode for a plane or plate, but not an airfoil.

What is the secret to the plate’s stability? Our investigations point to the translational torque \(\tau_T\) in \((3)\), which corresponds to the pitching moment that is associated with the fluid forces acting at a location that is different from the CoM [4]. Expressed in terms of the center of pressure (CoP), \(\tau_T\) is the pressure force multiplied by the CoP-to-CoM distance. The subtlety lies in the CoP’s dependence on the AoA. Experimental measurements indicate that a thin plate has a CoP profile that decreases with AoA (see the magenta curve in Figure 2c), meaning that the forces are concentrated closer to the front at low angles and towards the middle at higher angles. This relationship implies that perturbations to the angle, whether increasing or decreasing, face appropriate restoring torques as the CoP moves to the fore or aft of the CoM. But the same is not true for an airfoil, whose flat CoP profile (see the cyan curve in Figure 2c) indicates a lack of response to changes in AoA [2].

This explanation evokes the question of why the different CoP profiles occur. The value of \(\mathrm{CoP} = 0.25\) and its invariance with AoA are results of the Kutta-Joukowski theorem for airfoils, whose more famous prediction applies to lift [2]. The theory assumes that the flow over the leading edge is smoothly attached (see Figure 2e), which typically holds if the AoA is small and the foil is thin. Yet this logic does not apply if the foil is too thin—i.e., paper thin —since a thin plate or sheet behaves altogether differently than a foil. Its sharp leading edge triggers flow separation even at small angles [8], and reattachment further downstream traps a vortex or so-called “separation bubble” on the upper side of the plate (see Figure 2d). The separation region has low pressure and a size that varies with AoA, allowing for dynamical modifications of the pressure distribution and hence the CoP.

The intriguing picture that emerges is that a paper airplane hang-glides under a “bubble” that sits atop its leading edge and inflates and contracts in a way that ensures a smooth ride. This mechanism of dynamic stabilization is wholly different from that of a conventional airplane, which requires a tail because the airfoils of the main wing lack any intrinsic responsiveness.

These findings highlight the many twists, turns, and unexpected directions that result from seemingly simple questions about falling paper and flying paper planes. These systems are much more than curiosities — they drive advances in the modeling of flight dynamics, with applications to wing shapes, speeds, scales, and flow states that are outside the domain of standard aerodynamics. Once we better understand the relevant effects, we can exploit them to design small-scale flying robots that are inspired by the flapping-wing flight of insects or the various falling styles of plant seeds [9, 10]. We therefore anticipate many future applications for models and simulations that can accurately capture such unconventional aerodynamics.

References [1] Andersen, A., Pesavento, U., & Wang, Z.J. (2005). Unsteady aerodynamics of fluttering and tumbling plates. J. Fluid Mech. , 541 , 65-90. [2] Anderson, J. (2016). Fundamentals of aerodynamics (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill. [3] Jones, M.A., & Shelley, M.J. (2005). Falling cards. J. Fluid Mech. , 540 , 393-425. [4] Li, H., Goodwill, T., Wang, Z.J., & Ristroph, L. (2022). Centre of mass location, flight modes, stability and dynamic modelling of gliders. J. Fluid Mech. , 937 , A6. [5] Mahadevan, L., Ryu, W.S., & Aravinthan, D.T.S. (1999). Tumbling cards. Phys. Fluids , 11 (1), 1-3. [6] Maxwell, J.C. (1890). The scientific papers of James Clerk Maxwell (Vol. 1). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. [7] Pesavento, U., & Wang, Z.J. (2004). Falling paper: Navier-Stokes solutions, model of fluid forces, and center of mass elevation. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 93 (14), 144501. [8] Smith, J.A., Pisetta, G., & Viola, I.M. (2021). The scales of the leading-edge separation bubble. Phys. Fluids , 33 (4), 045101. [9] Viola, I.M., & Nakayama, N. (2022). Flying seeds. Curr. Biol. , 32 (5), R204-R205. [10] Wang, Z.J. (2005). Dissecting insect flight. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. , 37 , 183-210.

Huilin Li is a Ph.D. student in mathematics at New York University Shanghai and a member of the Applied Mathematics Laboratory (AML) at New York University’s (NYU) Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences. Leif Ristroph is an applied mathematician and experimental physicist who directs the AML at NYU’s Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences.

Please login or register to post comments.

Paper Airplane Study Finds New Aerodynamic Effects

A team of researchers analyzing the flight characteristics of paper airplanes have found a whole new set of unexpected aerodynamic effects. Initially designed to understand the basic mechanics behind what makes a good paper airplane fly, the novel aerodynamic effects found by researchers may lead to the development of a whole new class of flying robots or small drones that function with very few moving parts.

WHAT MAKES A GOOD PAPER AIRPLANE FLY?

What is it that makes a good paper airplane glide across a lengthy high school cafeteria but dooms other similar-appearing craft to dive straight into the floor? It’s a question that has flummoxed more than one would-be paper airline launcher and one that motivated a team of researchers from New York University’s (NYU) Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences and Cornell University to search for an answer.

“The study started with simple curiosity about what makes a good paper airplane and specifically what is needed for smooth gliding,” explains NYU associate professor and study co-author Leif Ristroph in a press release announcing the research. “Answering such basic questions ended up being far from child’s play. We discovered that the aerodynamics of how paper airplanes keep level flight is really very different from the stability of conventional airplanes.”

CENTER OF MASS IS THE KEY

To begin their study, the research team evaluated the mathematics behind paper airplane flight. For instance, a paper airplane has no motor but instead relies on gravity for its gliding movement, much like a gliding bird.

“Birds glide and soar in an effortless way, and paper airplanes, when tuned properly, can also glide for long distances,” said study co-author Jane Wang, a professor of engineering and physics at Cornell University. “Surprisingly, there has been no good mathematical model for predicting this seemingly simple but subtle gliding flight.”

It soon became apparent that absent previous mathematical modeling, uncovering the secrets of paper airplane flight would require some real-world testing. First, the team used a basic triangle design for their paper airplane, which is considered the simplest and most efficient form. Next, the researchers placed thin pieces of copper tape on the front part of the paper airplanes, much like the paper clip used in many homemade models. The copper tape segments were placed in different locations on each plane, creating a differing center of mass.

“The key criterion of a successful glider is that the center of mass must be in the ‘just right’ place,” Ristroph explains. “Good paper airplanes achieve this with the front edge folded over several times or by an added paper clip, which requires a little trial and error.”

After numerous paper airplane launches in a laboratory setting, the team found the best weight location to maximize flight distances.

“If the weight was at the center of the wing or only displaced somewhat from the middle, it underwent wild motions, such as fluttering or tumbling,” the press release explains. “If the weight was displaced too far toward one edge, then the flier quickly dove downwards and crashed. In between, however, there was a “sweet spot” for the center of mass that gave stable gliding.”

The team mirrored these test flights by sinking a set of plates in a water tank and observing their “gliding” motion on the way to the bottom. Lead weights were placed at different locations on the plates to change their center of mass, much like the copper tape on the paper airplane.

The researchers combined all of this accumulated data to create customized “flight simulator” software that allowed them to analyze and simulate paper airplane flight. And to their surprise, they not only found out how to make a good airplane, but they also learned that the aerodynamic principles of a gliding paper airplane (or a sinking plate) were completely different from that of a conventional aircraft.

41,000 Years Ago, a Rare, Extreme Event Allowed an Onslaught of Cosmic Rays Through Earth’s Magnetic Field

“The effect we found in paper airplanes does not happen for the traditional airfoils used as aircraft wings, whose center of pressure stays fixed in place across the angles that occur in flight,” said Ristroph. “The shifting of the center of pressure thus seems to be a unique property of thin, flat wings, and this ends up being the secret to the stable flight of paper airplanes.”

“This is why airplanes need a separate tail wing as a stabilizer,” he added, “while a paper plane can get away with just a main wing that gives both lift and stability.”

PAPER AIRPLANE AERODYNAMICS MAY LEAD TO INNOVATIVE AIRCRAFT

Published in the Journal of Fluid Mechanics , the study offers a unique insight into a child’s toy that nearly everyone has built. More importantly, it also found a whole new set of aerodynamic principles that the researchers believe could lead to the development of new types of hyper-efficient, specialized aircraft.

“We hope that our findings will be useful in small-scale flight applications,” concluded Ristroph, “where you may want a minimal design that does not require a lot of extra flight surfaces, sensors, and controllers.”

Unfortunately, the study did not indicate where you should write the “Do you like me? Mark Yes or No” message. SMH.

Follow and connect with author Christopher Plain on Twitter:   @plain_fiction

February 28, 2013

Soaring Science: Test Paper Planes with Different Drag

An aerodynamic activity from Science Buddies

By Science Buddies

Key concepts Aerodynamics Planes Forces Drag Physics

Introduction Have you ever wondered what makes a paper plane fly? Some paper planes clearly fly better than others. But why is this? One factor is the kind of design used to build the plane. In this activity you'll get to build a paper plane and change its basic design to see how this affects its flight. There's a lot of cool science in this activity, such as how forces act on a plane so it can fly. So get ready to start folding!

Background The forces that allow a paper plane to fly are the same ones that apply to real airplanes. A force is something that pushes or pulls on something else. When you throw a paper plane in the air, you are giving the plane a push to move forward. That push is a type of force called thrust. While the plane is flying forward, air moving over and under the wings is providing an upward lift force on the plane. At the same time, air pushing back against the plane is slowing it down, creating a drag force. The weight of the paper plane also affects its flight, as gravity pulls it down toward Earth. All of these forces (thrust, lift, drag and gravity) affect how well a given paper plane's voyage goes. In this activity you will increase how much drag a paper plane experiences and see if this changes how far the plane flies.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing . By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Materials • Sheet of paper • Ruler • Scissors • Large open area in which to fly a paper plane, such as a long hallway, school gym or basketball court. If you're flying your paper plane outside, such as in a field, try to do it when there isn't any wind. • Something to make at least a one-foot-long line, such as a long string, another ruler, masking tape, rocks or sticks. • Paper clips (optional)

Preparation • Make a standard, "dart" design paper airplane (for instructions, go to the Amazing Paper Airplanes Web page ). • Fold your paper into the basic dart paper plane. Fold carefully and make your folds as sharp as possible, such as by running a thumbnail or a ruler along each fold to crease it. Do not bend up the tailing edge of the wings (step 6 of the online folding instructions). • Go to a large open area and, using string, a ruler, masking tape, rocks or sticks, make a line in front of you that's at least one foot long, going from left to right. This will be the starting line from which you'll fly the paper plane.

Procedure • Place your toe on the line you prepared and throw the paper plane. Did it fly very far? • Throw the plane at least four more times. Each time before you throw the plane, make sure it is still in good condition (that the folds and points are still sharp). When you toss it, place your toe on the line and try to launch the plane with a similar amount of force, including gripping it at the same spot. Did it go about the same distance each time? • Once you have a good idea of about how far your plane typically flies, change the plane’s shape to increase how much drag it experiences. To do this, cut slits that are about one inch long right where either wing meets the middle ridge. Fold up the cut section on both wings so that each now has a one-inch-wide section at the end of the wing that is folded up, at about a 90-degree angle from the rest of the wing. • Throw your modified paper plane at least five more times, just as you did before. How far does the paper plane fly now compared with before? Why do you think this is, and what does it have to do with drag? • Extra: Make paper planes that are different sizes and compare how well they fly. Do bigger planes fly farther? • Extra: Try making paper planes out of different types of paper, such as printer paper, construction paper and newspaper. Use the same design for each. Does one type of paper seem to work best for making paper planes? Does one type work the worst? • Extra: Some people like to add paper clips to their paper planes to make them fly better. Try adding a paper clip (or multiple paper clips) to different parts of your paper plane (such as the front, back, middle or wings) and then flying it. How does this affect the plane's flight? Does adding paper clips somewhere make its flight better or much worse? Observations and results Did the original plane fly the farthest? Did the plane with increased drag fly a much shorter distance?

As a paper plane moves through the air, the air pushes against the plane, slowing it down. This force is called drag. To think about drag, imagine you are in a moving car and you put your hand out the window. The force of the air pushing your hand back as you move forward is drag, also sometimes referred to as air resistance. In this activity you increased how much drag acted on the paper plane by making a one-inch-high vertical strip on both wings. For example, this is what happens when you're in a moving car with your hand out the window and you change its position from horizontal to vertical. When your hand is held out vertically, it catches a greater amount of air and experiences a greater drag than when it is horizontal. You could probably feel this, as your hand would be more forcefully pushed back as the car moves forward. This is what happened to the modified plane—it experienced a greater amount of drag, which pushed it back more than the original plane. This experiment has clearly demonstrated that altering how just one force acts on a paper plane can dramatically change how well it flies.

Cleanup Recycle the paper plane when you are done with it.

More to explore Dynamics of Flight: Forces of Flight , from NASA What Makes Paper Airplanes Fly? , from Scholastic Forces of Flight—Drag , from The Franklin Institute How Far Will It Fly? Build and Test Various Paper Planes , from Science Buddies

This activity brought to you in partnership with  Science Buddies

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Download Free PDF

On the Aerodynamics of Paper Airplanes

2009, AIAA Proceedings.[np]. 22-25 …

Related papers

Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences

Paper plane has a high potential to be upgraded as a Micro Air Vehicle (MAV). Due to its simplicity, paper plane offers easier design option compared to the biological inspired designs as shown in recent MAV development. However, researchers have underestimate and overlook the basic aerodynamic performance induced by these paper planes. This is due to its common usage as toys and wide range of paper plane design. Thus, the objective for current work is to analyse and compare the aerodynamics forces and its performance for selected paper plane design known as Glider, Wide Stunt Glider Plane and Stunt plane. A series of CFD simulations on each paper plane was executed by using ANSYS-CFX module. A steady state, incompressible flow Navier-Stokes equation (RANS) combined with Shear Stress Turbulence (SST) model were used in this works to solve flow problem over the paper planes. The analysis is mainly conducted to study and compare the lift coefficient (), drag coefficient ()and aerodyna...

Science China-technological Sciences, 2009

This paper summaries the investigations on natural flyers and development of bio-mimetic micro air vehicles (MAVs) at NUAA, China, where the authors have led a group to conduct research for a decade. The investigations include the studies of low Reynolds number aerodynamics, unsteady computational fluid dynamics and flight control for the fixed-wing MAVs, the bird-like MAVs, the dragonfly-like MAVs and the bee-like MAVs.

Experiments in Fluids, 2009

In this paper, the decade of numerical and experimental investigations leading to the development of the authors' unique flapping-wing micro air vehicle is summarized. Early investigations included the study of boundary layer energization by means of a small flapping foil embedded in a flat-plate boundary layer, the reduction of the recirculatory flow region behind a backward-facing step by means of

Experiments in Fluids, 2011

Insect-like flapping flight offers a power-efficient and highly manoeuvrable basis for micro air vehicles for indoor applications. Some aspects of the aerodynamics associated with the sweeping phase of insect wing kinematics are examined by making particle image velocimetry measurements on a rotating wing immersed in a tank of seeded water. The work is motivated by the paucity of data with quantified error on insect-like flapping flight, and aims to fill this gap by providing a detailed description of the experimental setup, quantifying the uncertainties in the measurements and explaining the results. The experiments are carried out at two Reynolds numbers—500 and 15,000—accounting for scales pertaining to many insects and future flapping-wing micro air vehicles, respectively. The results from the experiments are used to describe prominent flow features, and Reynolds number-related differences are highlighted. In particular, the behaviour of the leading-edge vortex at these Reynolds numbers is studied and the presence of Kelvin–Helmholtz instability observed at the higher Reynolds number in computational fluid dynamics calculations is also verified.

44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 2006

A comprehensive numerical simulation of fluid dynamics based study of a pleated wing section based on the wing of Aeshna Cyanea has been performed at ultra-low Reynolds number corresponding to the gliding flight of these dragonflies in order to explore the potential applications of pleated airfoils for micro air vehicle applications. The simulation employs an unstructured triangular mesh based on finite volume discretization done in the ANSYS-14.0 using WorkBench14.0.Whenever, dragonfly wing interacts with the fluid (air taken), several forces and vibrations results out. These forces and vibrations cause certain changes over the dimensional structure over the wing and also influence the flows characteristics. A critical assessment of the computed results was performed. In this work, various flow patterns and aerodynamic performance of pleated airfoil has been obtained at ultra-low Reynolds numbers (2000-3000) at different angle of attacks (AOA) ranging from 0 ° to15 °. Also there effects on coefficient of Lift and Drag have been analysed. The simulations demonstrate that pleated airfoil produces higher lift and moderate drag that lead to an aerodynamic performance and hence pleated airfoil is an excellent choice for a fixed wing micro-air vehicle application.

Interface Focus

Aerial robots capable of locomotion in both air and water would enable novel mission profiles in complex environments, such as water sampling after floods or underwater structural inspections. The design of such a vehicle is challenging because it implies significant propulsive and structural design trade-offs for operation in both fluids. In this paper, we present a unique Aquatic Micro Air Vehicle (AquaMAV), which uses a reconfigurable wing to dive into the water from flight, inspired by the plunge diving strategy of water diving birds in the family Sulidae . The vehicle's performance is investigated in wind and water tunnel experiments, from which we develop a planar trajectory model. This model is used to predict the dive behaviour of the AquaMAV, and investigate the efficacy of passive dives initiated by wing folding as a means of water entry. The paper also includes first field tests of the AquaMAV prototype where the folding wings are used to initiate a plunge dive.

29th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 2011

INCAS BULLETIN,, 2019

Corrugations are folds on a surface as found on wings of dragon fly insects. Although they fly at relatively lower altitudes its wings are adapted for better aerodynamic and aero-elastic characteristics. In the present work, three airfoil geometries were studied using the 2-D panel method to evaluate the aerodynamic performance for low Reynolds number. The experiments were conducted in wind tunnel for incompressible flow regime to demonstrate the coefficients of lift drag and glide ratio at two Reynolds numbers 1.9x10 4 and 1.5x10 5 and for angles of attack ranging between 0 0 and 16 0. The panel method results have been validated using the current and existing experiment data as well as with the computational work from cited literature. A good agreement between the experimental and the panel methods were found for low angles of attack. The results showed that till 8 0 angle of attack higher lift coefficient and lower drag coefficient are obtainable for corrugated airfoils as compared to NACA 0010. The validation of surface pressure coefficients for all three airfoils using the panel method at 4 0 angles of attack was done. The contours of the non-dimensional pressure and velocity are illustrated from-10 0 to 20 0 angles of attack. A good correlation between the experiment data and the computational methods revealed that the corrugated airfoils exhibit better aerodynamic performance than NACA 0010.

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

International Journal of Engineering Systems Modelling and Simulation, 2014

Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2006

Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

Journal of Aircraft, 2005

AUVSI Unmanned Systems 2000 Symposium and …, 2000

Journal of Aircraft, 2008

AIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum, 2022

Int J Aeronaut Aerosp Eng., 2019

International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology, 2022

Micro- and Nanotechnology Sensors, Systems, and Applications IV, 2012

47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 2009

Flow Phenomena in Nature Volume 2, 2006

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

• Skip to primary navigation
• Skip to main content

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

For latest research on aerodynamics, scientists turn to paper airplanes

By General Aviation News Staff · October 3, 2022 ·

A series of experiments using paper airplanes reveals new aerodynamic effects, according to researchers at New York University.

They say their findings “enhance our understanding of flight stability” and could inspire new types of flying vehicles.

“The study started with simple curiosity about what makes a good paper airplane and specifically what is needed for smooth gliding,” explains Leif Ristroph, an associate professor at New York University’s Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences and an author of the study, which appears in the Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

“Answering such basic questions ended up being far from child’s play. We discovered that the aerodynamics of how paper airplanes keep level flight is really very different from the stability of conventional airplanes.”

“Birds glide and soar in an effortless way, and paper airplanes, when tuned properly, can also glide for long distances,” adds author Jane Wang, a professor of engineering and physics at Cornell University. “Surprisingly, there has been no good mathematical model for predicting this seemingly simple but subtle gliding flight.”

Since we can make complicated modern airplanes fly, the researchers say, one might think we know all there is to know about the simplest flying machines.

“But paper airplanes, while simple to make, involve surprisingly complex aerodynamics,” notes Ristroph.

The researchers began their study by considering what is needed for a plane to glide smoothly. Since paper airplanes have no engine and rely on gravity and proper design for their movement, they are good candidates for exploring factors behind flight stability, they said.

To investigate this phenomenon, the researchers conducted lab experiments by launching paper airplanes with differing centers of mass through the air. The results, along with those from studying plates falling in a water tank, allowed the team to devise a new aerodynamic model and also a “flight simulator” capable of predicting the motions.

To find the best design, the researchers placed different amounts of thin copper tape on the front part of the paper planes, giving them varied center of mass locations. Lead weights added to the plates in water served the same purpose.

“The key criterion of a successful glider is that the center of mass must be in the ‘just right’ place,” Ristroph says. “Good paper airplanes achieve this with the front edge folded over several times or by an added paper clip, which requires a little trial and error.”

The researchers discovered that flight motions depended on finding that “just right” place.

For example, if the weight was at the center of the wing or only displaced somewhat from the middle, it underwent wild motions, such as fluttering or tumbling. If the weight was displaced too far toward one edge, then the flier quickly dove downwards and crashed. In between, however, there was a “sweet spot” for the center of mass that gave stable gliding.

The researchers coupled the experimental work with a mathematical model that served as the basis of a “flight simulator,” a computer program that successfully reproduced the different flight motions. It also helped explain why a paper airplane is stable in its glide. When the center of mass is in the “sweet spot,” the aerodynamic force on the plane’s wing pushes the wing back down if the plane moves upward and back up if it moves downward, the researchers explain.

“The location of the aerodynamic force or center of pressure varies with the angle of flight in such a way to ensure stability,” Ristroph says.

He notes that this dynamic does not occur with conventional aircraft wings, which are airfoils, structures whose shapes work to generate lift.

“The effect we found in paper airplanes does not happen for the traditional airfoils used as aircraft wings, whose center of pressure stays fixed in place across the angles that occur in flight,” Ristroph says. “The shifting of the center of pressure seems to be a unique property of thin, flat wings, and this ends up being the secret to the stable flight of paper airplanes.”

“This is why airplanes need a separate tail wing as a stabilizer while a paper plane can get away with just a main wing that gives both lift and stability,” he concludes. “We hope that our findings will be useful in small-scale flight applications, where you may want a minimal design that does not require a lot of extra flight surfaces, sensors, and controllers.”

Reader Interactions

Share this story.

• Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
• Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
• Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
• Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
• Share via Email Share via Email

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily. Sign up here .

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here .

October 4, 2022 at 7:50 am

Interesting subject. When I was young, and could not afford any kind of flying machine, I found relief from my flying passion by building paper models. Some of them were actually aerodynamically impressive, with very shallow glides and very stable. Since I lived in a mountainous area I could let them go and at times get lucky were some would catch some lift and fly for a while. During those moments I would dream of one day flying a real aircraft. Eventually that lead to flying RC models, getting my private license and eventually a fun life engaged in different forms of aviation activities.

Thanks for reminding me of this fun aspect of my aviation career.

share this!

March 1, 2022

For new insights into aerodynamics, scientists turn to paper airplanes

by New York University

A series of experiments using paper airplanes reveals new aerodynamic effects, a team of scientists has discovered. Its findings enhance our understanding of flight stability and could inspire new types of flying robots and small drones.

"The study started with simple curiosity about what makes a good paper airplane and specifically what is needed for smooth gliding," explains Leif Ristroph, an associate professor at New York University's Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences and an author of the study, which appears in the Journal of Fluid Mechanics . "Answering such basic questions ended up being far from child's play. We discovered that the aerodynamics of how paper airplanes keep level flight is really very different from the stability of conventional airplanes."

"Birds glide and soar in an effortless way, and paper airplanes, when tuned properly, can also glide for long distances," adds author Jane Wang, a professor of engineering and physics at Cornell University. "Surprisingly, there has been no good mathematical model for predicting this seemingly simple but subtle gliding flight."

Since we can make complicated modern airplanes fly, the researchers say, one might think we know all there is to know about the simplest flying machines.

"But paper airplanes, while simple to make, involve surprisingly complex aerodynamics," notes Ristroph.

The paper's authors began their study by considering what is needed for a plane to glide smoothly. Since paper airplanes have no engine and rely on gravity and proper design for their movement, they are good candidates for exploring factors behind flight stability.

To investigate this phenomenon, the researchers conducted lab experiments by launching paper airplanes with differing centers of mass through the air. The results, along with those from studying plates falling in a water tank, allowed the team to devise a new aerodynamic model and also a "flight simulator" capable of predicting the motions.

To find the best design, the researchers placed different amounts of thin copper tape on the front part of the paper planes, giving them varied center of mass locations. Lead weights added to the plates in water served the same purpose.

"The key criterion of a successful glider is that the center of mass must be in the 'just right' place," Ristroph explains. "Good paper airplanes achieve this with the front edge folded over several times or by an added paper clip, which requires a little trial and error."

In the experiments, the researchers found that the flight motions depended sensitively on the center of mass location. Specifically, if the weight was at the center of the wing or only displaced somewhat from the middle, it underwent wild motions, such as fluttering or tumbling. If the weight was displaced too far toward one edge, then the flier quickly dove downwards and crashed. In between, however, there was a " sweet spot " for the center of mass that gave stable gliding.

The researchers coupled the experimental work with a mathematical model that served as the basis of a "flight simulator," a computer program that successfully reproduced the different flight motions. It also helped explain why a paper airplane is stable in its glide. When the center of mass is in the "sweet spot," the aerodynamic force on the plane's wing pushes the wing back down if the plane moves upward and back up if it moves downward.

"The location of the aerodynamic force or center of pressure varies with the angle of flight in such a way to ensure stability," explains Ristroph.

He notes that this dynamic does not occur with conventional aircraft wings, which are airfoils—structures whose shapes work to generate lift.

"The effect we found in paper airplanes does not happen for the traditional airfoils used as aircraft wings, whose center of pressure stays fixed in place across the angles that occur in flight," Ristroph says. "The shifting of the center of pressure thus seems to be a unique property of thin, flat wings, and this ends up being the secret to the stable flight of paper airplanes."

"This is why airplanes need a separate tail wing as a stabilizer while a paper plane can get away with just a main wing that gives both lift and stability," he concludes. "We hope that our findings will be useful in small-scale flight applications, where you may want a minimal design that does not require a lot of extra flight surfaces, sensors, and controllers."

Explore further

Feedback to editors

Computing scheme accelerates machine learning while improving energy efficiency of traditional data operations

34 minutes ago

New continuous reaction process can help turn plant waste into sustainable aviation fuel

2 hours ago

New tandem solar cells break efficiency record—they could eventually supercharge how we get energy from the sun

3 hours ago

Enhancing semiconductor functionality with TeSeO materials for future electronics

Bubbling up: Uncovering melt pool dynamics in metal manufacturing

4 hours ago

New study shows AI can forecast mining disasters

5 hours ago

Unique straining affects phase transformations in silicon, a material vital for electronics

23 hours ago

Meta unveils cheaper VR headset, AI updates and shows off prototype for holographic AR glasses

From quantum to wireless: Enhancing chip-scale communication with terahertz tech

There's two sides to this semiconductor, and many simultaneous functions

Sep 25, 2024

Related Stories

Flying insects defy aerodynamic laws of airplanes, researchers find.

Jul 11, 2016

A twist in the tail: Flying fish give clues to 'tandem wing' airplane design

Jul 5, 2017

Manufacturing drone wings with locust wing capabilities

Jul 5, 2021

Bird-like wings could help drones keep stable in gusts

Jun 11, 2021

Using an analytical drag model to learn more about use of the tail by owls in flight

Feb 10, 2022

High-flying morpho butterflies evolved into efficient gliders

Nov 29, 2021

Recommended for you

Shark intestines inspire a new way to keep fluid flowing in one direction down a pipe

How US utility companies could double electric transmission capacity by 2035

Let us know if there is a problem with our content.

Use this form if you have come across a typo, inaccuracy or would like to send an edit request for the content on this page. For general inquiries, please use our contact form . For general feedback, use the public comments section below (please adhere to guidelines ).

Please select the most appropriate category to facilitate processing of your request

Thank you for taking time to provide your feedback to the editors.

Your feedback is important to us. However, we do not guarantee individual replies due to the high volume of messages.

E-mail the story

Your email address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the email. Neither your address nor the recipient's address will be used for any other purpose. The information you enter will appear in your e-mail message and is not retained by Tech Xplore in any form.

Your Privacy

This site uses cookies to assist with navigation, analyse your use of our services, collect data for ads personalisation and provide content from third parties. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use .

Airplane Science Fair Projects

Have you ever wondered how to turn a simple paper airplane into a winning  science fair project ? With a few design tweaks and scientific testing, you can explore the fascinating world of  aerodynamics  and see how different planes fly!

Paper Airplane Science Fair

Paper airplanes are fun to make and fly, but they can also teach us important science concepts. By experimenting with different designs, you can learn about  lift ,  drag , and  thrust , and create a great  science fair project . Let’s dive into an exciting paper airplane experiment, and you can even build a  paper airplane launcher to test your creations!

Recommended Grade Level: 3rd-6th Grades

• Different types of paper (printer paper, construction paper)
• Ruler or measuring tape
• Stopwatch or timer
• Tape Measure
• Pens and Pencils
• Open indoor or outdoor space for testing
• Notebook or data collection sheet
• Paper clips
• Rubber bands (for optional launcher)
• Printable Instructions and blank graph (Join us in the Library Club )

💡 Check out our  How to Make Paper Airplanes here with free instructions!

Airplane Science Fair Project Set Up

Create different airplane designs : Fold several paper airplanes with different wing sizes, shapes, and body lengths. Keep your designs consistent by using the same paper size and folding techniques. Wing design matters! Our airplane templates will help.

Set up a testing area : Use an open space without wind interference. Mark your starting point, and throw each airplane with the same amount of force to keep the test fair.

💡 See our tips for throwing paper airplanes here . Remember you’ll want to launch your airplane the same way every time!

Measure and record data : Use a ruler or measuring tape to measure how far each airplane flies. Time how long each plane stays in the air with a stopwatch. Record your results in a notebook to create a data table or bar graph later (see below for an example).

Analyze the data : Repeat the test a few times for each airplane design to ensure accuracy. Calculate the average distance and flight time for each design.

Use a launcher (optional) : Want to add more fun? Use a rubber band launcher to propel your planes and test if they fly farther compared to hand throws. You can check out our  Airplane Launcher Tutorial here .

Airplane Science Information

Aerodynamics : This project helps you understand how air moves around an object. The wings of the paper airplane interact with the air, creating  lift  to keep the plane flying. At the same time,  drag  slows the plane down.

Thrust : Whether using your hand or a launcher, the force that moves the plane forward is called  thrust .

Lift and Drag : Different wing designs create varying levels of lift and drag. Large wings might create more lift, but also more drag. Small, streamlined designs might fly faster with less drag but could lose altitude quicker.

Turn It into a Science Fair Project:

💡Here’s a great opportunity to use the scientific method and variables .

Formulate a Hypothesis : For example, “If I make a plane with larger wings, then it will fly farther because it will generate more lift.”

Test Different Variables : Use various types of paper, or add weight by attaching paper clips to test how weight affects the flight. You could also adjust the wing length and see how that changes the flight distance and duration. Choose an independent variable and a dependent variable.

By changing the airplane’s design, such as the shape of the wings ( independent variable ), and measuring how far it flies or how long it stays in the air ( dependent variable ), you can draw conclusions about how design impacts flight performance.

Collect Data : To get accurate results, collect data from multiple trials. Record how far and how long each plane flies and calculate averages. Create a bar graph (see our example below)!

Analyze and Present : Compare the results between different airplane designs. Which design flew the farthest? Which stayed in the air the longest? Share your findings on a science board or in a report.

💡 The bar graph below is a great example of what you can put on a science fair board !

This bar graph shows an example of the distances traveled by different paper airplane designs. Each design (such as “Wide Wings” or “Narrow Wings”) is listed on the x-axis, while the y-axis represents the distance flown in feet.

From the graph, you can compare which designs flew the farthest. For instance, in this example, the “Narrow Wings” design flew the farthest at 15 feet, while the “Long Body” design flew the shortest distance at 9 feet.

Explore Physics with More Things That Fly

This airplane science experiment fits perfectly into a physics lesson plan. Have some more fun with things that fly below. Throw in some fun with Galileo and Gravity experiments too.

• DIY Hovercraft
• Parachute STEM Challenge
• Paper Straw Rockets
• Baking Soda Bottle Rocket (Chemistry too!)
• Balloon Rocket
• Air Resitance with Air Foils

Printable Science Projects For Kids

If you’re looking to grab all of our printable science projects in one convenient place plus exclusive worksheets and bonuses like a STEAM Project pack, our Science Project Pack is what you need! Over 300+ Pages!

• Bonus Quick Grab Packs for Biology, Earth Science, Chemistry, and Physics
• 90+ classic science activities  with journal pages, supply lists, set up and process, and science information.  NEW! Activity-specific observation pages!
• Best science practices posters  and our original science method process folders for extra alternatives!
• Be a Collector activities pack  introduces kids to the world of making collections through the eyes of a scientist. What will they collect first?
• Know the Words Science vocabulary pack  includes flashcards, crosswords, and word searches that illuminate keywords in the experiments!
• My science journal writing prompts  explore what it means to be a scientist!!
• Bonus STEAM Project Pack:  Art meets science with doable projects!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to receive a free 5-Day STEM Challenge Guide

~ projects to try now ~.

Suggested Searches

• Climate Change
• Expedition 64
• Mars perseverance
• SpaceX Crew-2
• International Space Station
• View All Topics A-Z

Humans in Space

Earth & climate, the solar system, the universe, aeronautics, learning resources, news & events.

Arctic Sea Ice Near Historic Low; Antarctic Ice Continues Decline

Hubble Lights the Way with New Multiwavelength Galaxy View

What’s Up: September 2024 Skywatching Tips from NASA

• Search All NASA Missions
• A to Z List of Missions
• Upcoming Launches and Landings
• Spaceships and Rockets
• Communicating with Missions
• James Webb Space Telescope
• Hubble Space Telescope
• Why Go to Space
• Commercial Space
• Destinations
• Living in Space
• Explore Earth Science
• Earth, Our Planet
• Earth Science in Action
• Earth Multimedia
• Earth Science Researchers
• Pluto & Dwarf Planets
• Asteroids, Comets & Meteors
• The Kuiper Belt
• The Oort Cloud
• Skywatching
• The Search for Life in the Universe
• Black Holes
• The Big Bang
• Dark Energy & Dark Matter
• Earth Science
• Planetary Science
• Astrophysics & Space Science
• The Sun & Heliophysics
• Biological & Physical Sciences
• Lunar Science
• Citizen Science
• Astromaterials
• Aeronautics Research
• Human Space Travel Research
• Science in the Air
• NASA Aircraft
• Flight Innovation
• Supersonic Flight
• Air Traffic Solutions
• Green Aviation Tech
• Drones & You
• Technology Transfer & Spinoffs
• Space Travel Technology
• Technology Living in Space
• Manufacturing and Materials
• Science Instruments
• For Kids and Students
• For Educators
• For Colleges and Universities
• For Professionals
• Science for Everyone
• Requests for Exhibits, Artifacts, or Speakers
• STEM Engagement at NASA
• NASA's Impacts
• Centers and Facilities
• Directorates
• Organizations
• People of NASA
• Internships
• Our History
• Doing Business with NASA
• Get Involved

NASA en Español

• Aeronáutica
• Ciencias Terrestres
• Sistema Solar
• All NASA News
• Video Series on NASA+
• Newsletters
• Social Media
• Media Resources
• Upcoming Launches & Landings
• Virtual Guest Program
• Image of the Day
• Sounds and Ringtones
• Interactives
• STEM Multimedia

New Video Series Spotlights Engineers on NASA’s Europa Clipper Mission

Celebrating 10 Years at Mars with NASA’s MAVEN Mission

What You Need to Know about NASA’s SpaceX Crew-9 Mission

NASA Invites Public to Join as Virtual Guests for SpaceX Crew-9 Launch 

Educational activities in space.

NASA Astronaut Tracy C. Dyson’s Scientific Mission aboard Space Station

NASA’s Eyes for Museums

NASA Analysis Shows Irreversible Sea Level Rise for Pacific Islands

How NASA Uses and Improves Solar Power

NASA’s Artemis Science Instrument Gets Tested in Moon-Like Sandbox

NASA’s Hubble Finds that a Black Hole Beam Promotes Stellar Eruptions

In Odd Galaxy, NASA’s Webb Finds Potential Missing Link to First Stars

NASA’s BioSentinel Studies Solar Radiation as Earth Watches Aurora

Pioneer of Change: America Reyes Wang Makes NASA Space Biology More Open

Girls in STEM Inspired to Fly High at NASA Kennedy

ARMD Solicitations

Students Soar at NASA Glenn’s Aviation Day

NASA’s Record-Breaking Laser Demo Completes Mission

Amendment 52: B.9 Low-Cost Access to Space 2028 Peruvian campaign Update

Amendment 51: F.13 Lunar Terrain Vehicle Instruments Program Final Text and Due Dates.

NASA Moon to Mars Architecture Art Challenge

Bring NASA Into Your Classroom This Fall Through Virtual Experiences

How Do I Navigate NASA Learning Resources and Opportunities?

NASA Helps Build New Federal Sea Level Rise Website

NASA Expands Small Business, Industry Engagement Resources

La NASA invita a los medios al lanzamiento de Europa Clipper

El X-59 de la NASA avanza en las pruebas de preparación para volar

La NASA invita a creadores de las redes sociales al lanzamiento de la misión Europa Clipper

Paper planes help students learn engineering.

U.S. Rep. Donald McEachin made a stop at NASA’s Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia this week, bringing a group of middle school students with him to learn about wind tunnel models and the engineering design process by making complex paper airplanes.

​McEachin also toured Langley facilities where researchers are studying Earth’s atmosphere as well as developing a supersonic passenger plane and contributing to the development of a launch vehicle to explore space.

He told the students, in grades five through eight, that the key to their success “starts with finishing school.”

“Don’t let anybody tell you that you can’t do math,” McEachin said. “Seize it, and take advantage of it, and maybe one day I’ll be watching you land on Mars.”

Student Israel Dixon, 11, said the visit to Langley inspired him.

“Being here today is making me feel like I am important to the environment and society,” said Israel, who attends the Patrick Henry School of Science and Arts in Richmond, Virginia.

“It’s going to help me throughout life,” he said, “and maybe I will be able to come here one day to help with modeling, creating – and I would like to say that it would be fun to go to Mars, Pluto or the Moon.”

The student trip was facilitated by the Richmond chapter of the Continental Societies, Inc., whose mission is to create environments that empower children to reach their potential.

“The visit to NASA today allowed the Richmond Chapter of Continental Societies to continue to reach, teach and educate our children” said Nkechi G. Winkler, chapter president.

McEachin, Continental Societies members and students also toured the 14 x 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel and the Research Aircraft Hangar to learn more about Langley’s aviation research and flight operations. 

They also stopped by the Katherine G. Johnson Computational Research Facility, named after one of the agency’s first black “human computers.” Mary Jackson, a human computer featured in the movie “Hidden Figures” along with Johnson, was a founding member of the Continental Societies and first president of the Newport News/Hampton chapter.

For more about Langley, go to www.nasa.gov/langley .

• Publications
• Conferences & Events
• Professional Learning
• Science Standards
• Awards & Competitions
• Instructional Materials
• Free Resources
• For Preservice Teachers
• NCCSTS Case Collection
• Science and STEM Education Jobs
• Interactive eBooks+
• Digital Catalog
• Regional Product Representatives
• e-Newsletters
• Browse All Titles
• Bestselling Books
• Latest Books
• Popular Book Series
• Submit Book Proposal
• Web Seminars
• National Conference • New Orleans 24
• Leaders Institute • New Orleans 24
• National Conference • Philadelphia 25
• Exhibits & Sponsorship
• Submit a Proposal
• Conference Reviewers
• Past Conferences
• Latest Resources
• Professional Learning Units & Courses
• For Districts
• Online Course Providers
• Schools & Districts
• College Professors & Students
• The Standards
• Teachers and Admin
• eCYBERMISSION
• Toshiba/NSTA ExploraVision
• Junior Science & Humanities Symposium
• Teaching Awards
• Climate Change
• Earth & Space Science
• New Science Teachers
• Early Childhood
• Middle School
• High School
• Postsecondary
• Informal Education
• Journal Articles
• Lesson Plans
• e-newsletters
• Science & Children
• Science Scope
• The Science Teacher
• Journal of College Sci. Teaching
• Connected Science Learning
• NSTA Reports
• Next-Gen Navigator
• Science Update
• Teacher Tip Tuesday
• Trans. Sci. Learning

MyNSTA Community

• My Collections

In Flight With Paper Airplanes

An exploration with elementary engineering

Science and Children—February 2020 (Volume 57, Issue 6)

By Laura Katchmark, Elisabeth McCabe, Kristen Matthews, and Michele Koomen

Share Start a Discussion

What better way to engage fifth-grade students in science and engineering practices than to use paper airplanes to encourage them to question, explore, create, and test designs! This multi-day unit draws from a fourth-grade curriculum (Pearson 2012) aligned with the Next Generation Science Standards ( NGSS Lead States 2013 ) used in teacher education methods classes and taught to grade 5 students. In this article, we share an integrated unit that includes reading selections about Amelia Earhart and the forces involved in paper airplane flight, an overview of how we used paper airplanes in an experimental design process, and how we helped students develop conclusions based on the claims, evidence, and reasoning framework (CER; McNeill and Krajcik 2012 ).

Introduction

Our 45-minute introduction lesson is designed to acquaint students with the principles of engineering, gravity, and the design process. We started by asking students what they know about paper airplanes and flight, using a Know, Wonder, Learn (KWL) chart. Some student notes revealed they knew that airplanes were made from a sheet of paper, needed wings to fly, needed someone to throw them, and can travel far. They wondered about gravity, how to prevent a paper airplane from making loops, and airplane size and weight.

Next, we asked students to think about the work of an engineer (e.g., What does an engineer do?). We discussed how an engineer might design, develop, and test new products. Any product, like smartphones, computers, washing machines, and even classroom furniture, had to be engineered and tested. To understand how much of our world is “engineered” and to incorporate movement, we took a “silent” engineering walk through the school to look for engineered items. Students recorded examples they observed on a sticky note that later we transferred to a class list ( Figure 1 ). Once we regathered everyone, we focused our discussion on how each example was part of an engineering process of trial, test, and redesign.

Next, we told students that we would explore the design process of engineering by making paper airplanes. We used a shared reading to develop concepts about the forces that would be involved in the flight of a paper airplane (see Supplemental Resources). Before we started the reading, we had students work with a partner on a word sort, a vocabulary strategy that allow students to develop relationships among words and reasoning skills of classification and deduction ( Zygouris-Coe 2015 ). Partners sorted the words into groups related to parts of the airplane ( Figure 2 ). As the shared reading proceeded, we stopped to discuss some of the key concepts (lift, drag, gravity, and thrust) and uncover the meaning of words unfamiliar to students. We emphasized how paper airplanes fly down as a result of gravity.

Conducting the Mini-Investigation

Students really looked forward to the day that we would begin the actual scientific and engineering study ( Pauley, Weege, and Koomen et al. 2016 )! We started this 45-minute lesson with an overview of the main goals of the unit: to make and test a control paper airplane, to make another paper airplane with one change (a testable variable), and see how that flight compared to the control. In this lesson, we introduced the students to the mini-investigation sheet that they would eventually complete (see Supplemental Resources).

We modeled how to make a basic dart airplane and talked about safety and handling of the paper airplanes. We outlined behavioral expectations and classroom management techniques, including how to throw the airplanes safely in the air and not at each other, the importance of throwing paper airplanes one at a time, and using safety googles during the flight. In our class, students worked together in small groups (of three or four students) where each group made one paper airplane; however, individual students could each make one and then as a group choose the one that they thought might perform better. We spent some time talking with students about how this first paper airplane would be their control and how they would measure the distance travelled over three trials. A control is important in science and engineering investigations because it offers the investigator the opportunity to compare across variables. We found it was very important to give students time to “pilot” throwing their airplane in a consistent manner. By doing this, we were able to have the students actually model what worked and what didn’t versus us just telling them. For example, some student groups figured out and then demonstrated to the class how to get the most accurate measurement by laying metersticks end to end or throwing the plane with the arm and plane at a right angle to the floor. We instructed the students on how to make a data table on the back sheet of the mini-investigation ( Figure 3 ) and to collect both qualitative data (observations of flight behavior) and quantitative data (measurement of distance travelled) that we used as formative assessment. We concluded this part of the unit by having students jot down a few notes again on that first page of the mini-investigation sheet about how they might modify and improve their plane’s design to increase the distance travelled.

The Design Process

We began the design process lesson (45-minutes) by having the fifth-grade students refer to their mini-investigation sheets to talk together in their groups about some of the modifications and improvements that they might make to increase the distance traveled of the paper airplane. Adding rudders; using different lengths, sizes, or weight of paper (office paper, cardstock, cardboard, or wax paper); or adding weight using paper clips or clay are some of the variable design modifications students have tested. After the students talked for a bit in their groups, we found it helpful to pull the students together as a whole group to share some of the ideas that were emerging about a possible design change using prompts such as: What worked well with the first model? What didn’t? What changes can be made to yield different results or Why do you think a particular change will produce those results?

After the group discussion, the students continued working on their mini-investigation sheets within their small groups to craft a research question, form hypotheses, and lay out their plan. Students used the question frame ( How does _____ affect ____?) to develop their research question. For example, Molly’s group question was “How does material affect distance?” We taught the students to identify multiple hypotheses or the possible outcomes of their investigation ( Pauley, Weege, and Koomen 2016 ). We talked about how important it is to identify a null hypothesis or the possibility that there will be no effect between the variables. In Molly’s group, there are three possible outcomes:

H 1 : The control will travel the farthest.

H 2 : The cardboard plane will travel the farthest.

H O : The material will not affect distance.

Once the groups decided on their one design modification to test, they completed the mini-investigation sheet, with an eye to being consistent with the first set of trials with the control (i.e., same position for the launch and same person). We wrapped up this part of the unit by asking each group to share the variable they decided to test, which also served as a formative assessment.

Design Modifications and Testing

The next sequence of this unit allowed students time to construct their group’s modified airplane within a 45-minute lesson. We found it helpful for students to first review their mini investigation sheet and to keep in mind that they were testing the independent variable (the design modification that they will be comparing to the control). Next, each group constructed the new plane with its variable modification. The students tested their new design by running three trials as they did earlier in the unit, collecting both qualitative and quantitative data. We found that students need ample time to work and inquire to ensure accurate and comparable results. At the end of this part of the unit, student groups should have completed all three trials.

Working with paper airplanes sounds unthreatening; however, there are some things to take into account when teaching this unit.

Students should wear safety goggles when they are testing the airplanes in flight.

Use adequate spaces to encourage safety for all students (i.e., hallways, extra rooms, classroom).

Outline expectations for throwing airplanes (i.e., one person in the group throws one plane at a time down the runway; paper airplanes are not thrown at or over people).

Analysis and Conclusion

The final leg of this unit is where the students compare the experimental data against the control data, focusing on the analyze/interpret and conclude/report sections of the mini investigation sheet. To do this, students need to review the data tables from each of the two tests. As they review their data, we guide them with questions such as: “What do you notice about your two sets of data? How are they similar? How are they different? What patterns do you see?” (see Supplemental Resources). Students write down the answers to these questions in the analyze and interpret section of their planning sheet. For example, Jorge and his group noticed a pattern in distance traveled when using different-size paper for their planes: “The size of the paper can affect the distance it travels.”

Next, the students identify the claim that was supported by their evidence and circle it on their mini-investigations sheet. To communicate their conclusion, we use the claims, evidence, and reasoning (CER) sentence frames modified by Julie Jackson and colleagues (2016) based on the research of McNeill and Krajcik (2012) .

I claim ________ (claim: what the student knows/answers to a question or solution to a problem) because ___________ (evidence or data that support one of your hypotheses). I know I am right because ______ (reasoning: scientific concept, rule, or principle) ( Jackson, et al. 2016 , p. 65).

CER can be a little complicated for fifth graders, so we model how to use the frames. For example, Ellery and her fifth-grade group, wrote “I claim that my re-designed paper airplane is faster than my control because after three trials it went farther than my control by an average of 37 cm (supporting hypothesis 2). I know I am right because my re-designed paper airplane weighed less than my control which had less of a pull of gravity” (see NSTA Connection ).

Ellery tied the outcome of her group’s investigation to one of the key disciplinary core ideas of the unit: gravity. These written conclusions became part of our summative assessment using our rubric (see Supplemental Resources). To conclude, we returned to the KWL chart and asked students to reflect on what they had learned through the activities about paper airplanes and what makes them fly. The various colors of the sticky notes represent each stage of the KWL process.

Amelia Earhart

Engineering is a field with one of the worst gender gaps in all of the sciences ( Kanny, Sax, and Riggers-Piehl 2014 ). This unit creates an opportunity to address this disparity by highlighting the work of the pioneer aviator and champion of women’s rights: Amelia Earhart. Amelia Earhart was an American aviator who was the first woman to solo fly a plane across the Atlantic Ocean. She broke many records for airplane travel during her lifetime. Amelia disappeared in the South Pacific Ocean in July 1937 while trying to fly her plane named Electra around the world with her navigator Fred Noonan. She was declared dead on January 5, 1939.

We include a supplemental reading about Amelia Earhart that provides an overview of her accomplishments. To foster vocabulary development, we recommend using a word sort or the Five Most Important Words strategy ( Zygouris-Coe 2015 ). This strategy promotes deep understanding of words within a text and their context. First, students write down five words in a graphic organizer. Next, they use their own words to define the five selected words. Finally, they explain why the word is important in the reading selection. This strategy invites a student to explain what the words mean and why they are important for his or her understanding.

Reflections on Unit Taught

Drag and Gravity. As a paper airplane moves through the air, it pushes against the air, creating resistance or drag . If you want a paper airplane to fly far, you need to design a paper airplane with as little drag as possible. When we throw paper airplanes, they do not keep flying continuously. Instead, they fall down to the ground because of the force of gravity. Gravity is an invisible force that pulls objects to the center of our planet Earth. Objects with greater mass (like Earth) pull more than objects with less mass (paper airplanes). Keeping the paper airplane’s weight to a minimum will help fight against the pull of gravity.

Thrust and Lift. In this unit, student pilots use their muscles to thrust (forward movement) the paper airplane forward. Lift occurs as a result of the air below the paper airplane wing pushing up more than the air above the wing of the airplane is pushing down. The difference in pressure is actually what makes the paper airplane fly. The forces of thrust and lift help the paper airplane make a longer flight.

When the four forces are balanced they achieve a longer flight. Planes like the basic dart are designed to be thrown with a lot of force so they overcome gravity since they do not usually have a lot of drag or lift.

Versatility and adaptability are strengths of this unit. For example, when Laura was teaching this unit, she had only 25-minute segments to fit in a unit that was designed to span five 45-minute lessons. To maximize class time, she pre-folded the paper airplanes and measured the area of the room set aside for conducting the data collection. Additionally, we found it valuable to have students communicate their findings and conclusions with other groups at the end of the unit. We did this using the jigsaw approach, where students come together in groups, with each group member representing a different primary investigative group. In this way, students are informally modeling sharing of results using their mini-investigation sheets, similar to what scientists do when they share their findings at a conference. For example, Ellery (above) talked about what she learned by redesigning her paper airplane and the role of weight on gravity.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful for the review of the physics content of the manuscript by Professor Chuck Niederriter at Gustavus Adolphus College. This work was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (DR K-12-1417777). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or endorsement of the funding agency.

INTERNET RESOURCES

Basic dart  http://www.foldnfly.com/1.html#Basic-Dart

What is gravity?  https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/what-is-gravity/en/

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS

Amelia Earhart background info

Further reading about Amelia Earhart

Further reading about paper airplanes

Five Most Important Words

Science and Engineering Practice

Planning and Carrying Out Investigations

Classroom Connection:   Students design and construct an investigation that tests a modified design feature using paper airplanes.

Analyzing and Interpreting Data

Classroom Connection:   Students analyze and interpret data from two different test trials of the paper airplane.

Constructing Explanations and Designing Solutions

Classroom Connection:   Students explain in writing their conclusion using the CER sentence frames.

Disciplinary Core Idea

PS2.B: Types of Interactions The gravitational force of Earth acting on an object near Earth’s surface pulls that object toward the planet’s center.

Classroom Connection: Students use evidence from their paper airplane investigation to support their argument that the gravitational force exerted by the Earth on objects is down.

Crosscutting Concept

Classroom Connection: Students identify patterns in their data to support their claims and explanations regarding the best design solution.

Performance Expectation

• The materials, lessons, and activities outlined in the article are just one step toward reaching the performance expectation listed below.

5-PS2-1 . Support an argument that the gravitational force exerted by Earth on objects is directed down.

Jackson J., Durham A., Dowell S., Sockel J., and Boynton I.. 2016. Claims and evidence. Science and Children 54 (4): 64–69.

Kanny M.A., Sax L.J., and Riggers-Piehl T.A.. 2014. Investigating forty years of STEM research: How explanations for the gender gap have evolved over time. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 20 (2): 127–148.

McNeill K.L., and Krajcik J.. 2012. Supporting grade 5–8 students in constructing explanations in science: The claim, evidence and reasoning framework for talk and writing . Boston, MA: Pearson.

NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next generation science standards: For states, by states . Washington, DC: National Academies Press

Pauley L., Weege K., and Koomen M. 2016. Native Plants and Seeds, Oh My! Science and Children 53 (9): 32–38.

Zygouris-Coe V.I. 2015. Teaching discipline-specific literacies in grades 6–12: Preparing students for college, career, and workforce demands . New York: Routledge.

Aerospace NGSS Three-Dimensional Learning Elementary

You may also like

Reports Article

• Engineering
• Aerospace Engineering
• Aeronautical Engineering

Science behind Paper airplanes

• December 2017
• Aircraft Design

• VIT University

Discover the world's research

• 25+ million members
• 160+ million publication pages
• 2.3+ billion citations
• Recruit researchers
• Join for free
• Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up