discuss case study or the historical method as a comparative method

First is the comparative method, using in-case analysis. According to Lijphart , "the comparative method is here defined as one of the basic methods - the others being the experimental, statistical and case study methods - of establishing general empirical propositions. …Second, the comparative method is here defined as one of the basic ...

Venn diagram of comparative-historical analysis. within the social sciences. It involves eight steps: (1) formulate a problem, (2) conceptualize variables, (3) make hypotheses, (4) establish a sample, (5) operationalize concepts, (6) gather data, (7) analyze data to test hypoth-eses, and (8) make a conclusion.

b. Ogburn (1934, p. 261): The case-study method, when properly pursued, is an attempt to get at behavior by the historical method. Studies of social change rely also on the historical method. The historical method in the social sciences is of course more than merely the history of single events. It is also the history of

In the past, comparativists have oftentimes regarded case study research as an alternative to comparative studies proper. At the risk of oversimplification: methodological choices in comparative and international education (CIE) research, from the 1960s onwards, have fallen primarily on either single country (small n) contextualized comparison, or on cross-national (usually large n, variable ...

Comparative Case Study Analysis. Mono-national case studies can contribute to comparative research if they are composed with a larger framework in mind and follow the Method of Structured, Focused Comparison (George & Bennett, 2005). For case studies to contribute to cumulative development of knowledge and theory they must all explore the same ...

discuss the logic of the comparative method as a means to a goal, rather than as an end in itself. In other words, which instrument fits the Research ... The Single Case Study over time (i.e. a historical study or time series analysis) (3) Two or more cases at a few time intervals (i.e. closed universe of discourse)

This bright, engaging title provides a thorough and integrated review of comparative-historical methods. It sets out an intellectual history of comparative-historical analysis and presents the main methodological techniques employed by researchers, including: Comparative-historical analysis,; Case-based methods,; Comparative methods; Data, case selection & theory

Abstract. Historical and comparative methods comprise a diverse set of perspectives on and methodologies for examining temporality, including comparison, narrative, interpretive methods, and quantitative analysis. While many early sociologists used comparison implicitly, a more explicit comparative paradigm based on the work of Mill became ...

methodology. Process Analysis. Comparative-historical research is defined in part by the analysis of sequences events that occur within cases. Informally, analysts have long recognized that kind of "process analysis" facilitates causal inference when only a small number of cases are selected.

Irrespective of the focus of the study, three core traits concern with the explan-. -. atory goal, the conception of causation, and the method of theory testing (Mahoney and Terrie 2008) are fundamental to CHA. -. First is the comparative method, using in-case analysis. According to Lijphart (1971), the com-. ".

Furthermore, misconceptions about case studies contribute to the methodological barrier that exists within and between the two parent disciplines. This paper reviews the various definitions and uses of case studies and integrates a number of recent insights and advances into a practical guide for conducting case study research.

What makes a study comparative is not the particular techniques employed but the theoretical orientation and the sources of data. All the tools of the social scientist, including historical analysis, fieldwork, surveys, and aggregate data analysis, can be used to achieve the goals of comparative research.

Comparative historical research is a method of social science that examines historical events in order to create explanations that are valid beyond a particular time and place, either by direct comparison to other historical events, theory building, or reference to the present day. [1] [2] Generally, it involves comparisons of social processes across times and places.

The chapter then offers an assessment of the effect of the cultural turn to comparative-historical sociology by addressing the themes of temporality and narrative. It argues that in the early 21st century the field displays a variety of methodological strategies or perspectives and that this tolerance toward varied methodologies is likely to be ...

By way of introduction, it is necessary that we caution the reader with regard to the following: discussions of methodology within the field commonly known as comparative historical sociology are nearly inescapably analyses that involve the entire practice of the field—and what constitutes the field's state of the art. In this sense, they encompass a huge array of issues, including ...

tion Reconsidered: Case Studies and the Hempel-Dray Model," History and Theory 13 (1978), 208. 3. See his "Philosophy of History and Historical Research," Philosophy 34 (1969), 33. 4. See her "Norm and Law in the Theory of Action," Inquiry 77 (1968), 400-409. 5. Here I am paraphrasing a statement by T. Mischel, "Pragmatic Aspects of Explanation ...

Case study method is the most widely used method in academia for researchers interested in ... team members' details and history, and the operations of the project. End user feedback documents ... Beasley R. K. (1999). A practical guide to the comparative case study method in political psychology. Political Psychology, 20, 369-391. Crossref ...

the experimental, statistical, and case-study methods. The result has been an intellectual cross-fertilization of great benefit to the comparative method. Figure 2 provides an overview of these innovations. Innovations in the Comparative Method Innovations in the comparative method can be discussed in terms of the issues introduced above, encom-

In view of the major methodological challenges which confront researchers in public diplomacy (PD), the paper recognizes the method of comparative-historical analysis (CHA) as an eminently suitable approach for robust empirical studies. The paper starts by exploring different conceptualizations and operationalizations of public diplomacy. Subsequently, four defining characteristics of CHA are ...

Abstract This article studies the modern development of the comparative method in the humanities and social sciences within Europe and the United States, and specifically addresses comparative subfields of philology, linguistics, anthropology, sociology, political science, literature, history, and folklore studies. A juxtapositional study of these disciplinary histories demonstrates the ...

This article is a slightly edited excerpt from a forthcoming book by David Phillips & Michele Schweisfurth: Comparative and International Education: an introduction to theory, method, and practice (Continuum, 2007). This part of the study rehearses some of the considerations of method in comparative studies in education.

presented first. In the next step various ways in which comparative research is applied in social theory are exemplified, with especial attention paid to comparative studies of large-scale, macro-level historical process of social change. This article ends with a discussion of the limitations of comparison as a method of

This part of the study rehearses some of the considerations of method in comparative studies in education. The comparison of the educational systems of several countries lends itself to a variety of methods of treatment, depending somewhat on its purpose.[1] Much effort has been expended on discussion of appropriate methods in comparative ...