what is critical value in research

Critical Value

Critical value is a cut-off value that is used to mark the start of a region where the test statistic, obtained in hypothesis testing, is unlikely to fall in. In hypothesis testing, the critical value is compared with the obtained test statistic to determine whether the null hypothesis has to be rejected or not.

Graphically, the critical value splits the graph into the acceptance region and the rejection region for hypothesis testing. It helps to check the statistical significance of a test statistic. In this article, we will learn more about the critical value, its formula, types, and how to calculate its value.

What is Critical Value?

A critical value can be calculated for different types of hypothesis tests. The critical value of a particular test can be interpreted from the distribution of the test statistic and the significance level. A one-tailed hypothesis test will have one critical value while a two-tailed test will have two critical values.

Critical Value Definition

Critical value can be defined as a value that is compared to a test statistic in hypothesis testing to determine whether the null hypothesis is to be rejected or not. If the value of the test statistic is less extreme than the critical value, then the null hypothesis cannot be rejected. However, if the test statistic is more extreme than the critical value, the null hypothesis is rejected and the alternative hypothesis is accepted. In other words, the critical value divides the distribution graph into the acceptance and the rejection region. If the value of the test statistic falls in the rejection region, then the null hypothesis is rejected otherwise it cannot be rejected.

Critical Value Formula

Depending upon the type of distribution the test statistic belongs to, there are different formulas to compute the critical value. The confidence interval or the significance level can be used to determine a critical value. Given below are the different critical value formulas.

Critical Value Confidence Interval

The critical value for a one-tailed or two-tailed test can be computed using the confidence interval . Suppose a confidence interval of 95% has been specified for conducting a hypothesis test. The critical value can be determined as follows:

• Step 1: Subtract the confidence level from 100%. 100% - 95% = 5%.
• Step 2: Convert this value to decimals to get \(\alpha\). Thus, \(\alpha\) = 5%.
• Step 3: If it is a one-tailed test then the alpha level will be the same value in step 2. However, if it is a two-tailed test, the alpha level will be divided by 2.
• Step 4: Depending on the type of test conducted the critical value can be looked up from the corresponding distribution table using the alpha value.

The process used in step 4 will be elaborated in the upcoming sections.

T Critical Value

A t-test is used when the population standard deviation is not known and the sample size is lesser than 30. A t-test is conducted when the population data follows a Student t distribution . The t critical value can be calculated as follows:

• Determine the alpha level.
• Subtract 1 from the sample size. This gives the degrees of freedom (df).
• If the hypothesis test is one-tailed then use the one-tailed t distribution table. Otherwise, use the two-tailed t distribution table for a two-tailed test.
• Match the corresponding df value (left side) and the alpha value (top row) of the table. Find the intersection of this row and column to give the t critical value.

Test Statistic for one sample t test: t = \(\frac{\overline{x}-\mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}\). \(\overline{x}\) is the sample mean, \(\mu\) is the population mean, s is the sample standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.

Test Statistic for two samples t test: \(\frac{(\overline{x_{1}}-\overline{x_{2}})-(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2})}{\sqrt{\frac{s_{1}^{2}}{n_{1}}+\frac{s_{2}^{2}}{n_{2}}}}\).

Decision Criteria:

• Reject the null hypothesis if test statistic > t critical value (right-tailed hypothesis test).
• Reject the null hypothesis if test statistic < t critical value (left-tailed hypothesis test).
• Reject the null hypothesis if the test statistic does not lie in the acceptance region (two-tailed hypothesis test).

This decision criterion is used for all tests. Only the test statistic and critical value change.

Z Critical Value

A z test is conducted on a normal distribution when the population standard deviation is known and the sample size is greater than or equal to 30. The z critical value can be calculated as follows:

• Find the alpha level.
• Subtract the alpha level from 1 for a two-tailed test. For a one-tailed test subtract the alpha level from 0.5.
• Look up the area from the z distribution table to obtain the z critical value. For a left-tailed test, a negative sign needs to be added to the critical value at the end of the calculation.

Test statistic for one sample z test: z = \(\frac{\overline{x}-\mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}\). \(\sigma\) is the population standard deviation.

Test statistic for two samples z test: z = \(\frac{(\overline{x_{1}}-\overline{x_{2}})-(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2})}{\sqrt{\frac{\sigma_{1}^{2}}{n_{1}}+\frac{\sigma_{2}^{2}}{n_{2}}}}\).

F Critical Value

The F test is largely used to compare the variances of two samples. The test statistic so obtained is also used for regression analysis. The f critical value is given as follows:

• Subtract 1 from the size of the first sample. This gives the first degree of freedom. Say, x
• Similarly, subtract 1 from the second sample size to get the second df. Say, y.
• Using the f distribution table, the intersection of the x column and y row will give the f critical value.

Test Statistic for large samples: f = \(\frac{\sigma_{1}^{2}}{\sigma_{2}^{2}}\). \(\sigma_{1}^{2}\) variance of the first sample and \(\sigma_{2}^{2}\) variance of the second sample.

Test Statistic for small samples: f = \(\frac{s_{1}^{2}}{s_{2}^{2}}\). \(s_{1}^{1}\) variance of the first sample and \(s_{2}^{2}\) variance of the second sample.

Chi-Square Critical Value

The chi-square test is used to check if the sample data matches the population data. It can also be used to compare two variables to see if they are related. The chi-square critical value is given as follows:

• Identify the alpha level.
• Subtract 1 from the sample size to determine the degrees of freedom (df).
• Using the chi-square distribution table, the intersection of the row of the df and the column of the alpha value yields the chi-square critical value.

Test statistic for chi-squared test statistic: \(\chi ^{2} = \sum \frac{(O_{i}-E_{i})^{2}}{E_{i}}\).

Critical Value Calculation

Suppose a right-tailed z test is being conducted. The critical value needs to be calculated for a 0.0079 alpha level. Then the steps are as follows:

• Subtract the alpha level from 0.5. Thus, 0.5 - 0.0079 = 0.4921
• Using the z distribution table find the area closest to 0.4921. The closest area is 0.4922. As this value is at the intersection of 2.4 and 0.02 thus, the z critical value = 2.42.

Related Articles:

• Probability and Statistics
• Data Handling

Important Notes on Critical Value

• Critical value can be defined as a value that is useful in checking whether the null hypothesis can be rejected or not by comparing it with the test statistic.
• It is the point that divides the distribution graph into the acceptance and the rejection region.
• There are 4 types of critical values - z, f, chi-square, and t.

Examples on Critical Value

Example 1: Find the critical value for a left tailed z test where \(\alpha\) = 0.012.

Solution: First subtract \(\alpha\) from 0.5. Thus, 0.5 - 0.012 = 0.488.

Using the z distribution table, z = 2.26.

However, as this is a left-tailed z test thus, z = -2.26

Answer: Critical value = -2.26

Example 2: Find the critical value for a two-tailed f test conducted on the following samples at a \(\alpha\) = 0.025

Variance = 110, Sample size = 41

Variance = 70, Sample size = 21

Solution: \(n_{1}\) = 41, \(n_{2}\) = 21,

\(n_{1}\) - 1= 40, \(n_{2}\) - 1 = 20,

Sample 1 df = 40, Sample 2 df = 20

Using the F distribution table for \(\alpha\) = 0.025, the value at the intersection of the 40 th column and 20 th row is

F(40, 20) = 2.287

Answer: Critical Value = 2.287

Example 3: Suppose a one-tailed t-test is being conducted on data with a sample size of 8 at \(\alpha\) = 0.05. Then find the critical value.

Solution: n = 8

df = 8 - 1 = 7

Using the one tailed t distribution table t(7, 0.05) = 1.895.

Answer: Crititcal Value = 1.895

go to slide go to slide go to slide

Book a Free Trial Class

FAQs on Critical Value

What is the critical value in statistics.

Critical value in statistics is a cut-off value that is compared with a test statistic in hypothesis testing to check whether the null hypothesis should be rejected or not.

What are the Different Types of Critical Value?

There are 4 types of critical values depending upon the type of distributions they are obtained from. These distributions are given as follows:

• Normal distribution (z critical value).
• Student t distribution (t).
• Chi-squared distribution (chi-squared).
• F distribution (f).

What is the Critical Value Formula for an F test?

To find the critical value for an f test the steps are as follows:

• Determine the degrees of freedom for both samples by subtracting 1 from each sample size.
• Find the corresponding value from a one-tailed or two-tailed f distribution at the given alpha level.
• This will give the critical value.

What is the T Critical Value?

The t critical value is obtained when the population follows a t distribution. The steps to find the t critical value are as follows:

• Subtract the sample size number by 1 to get the df.
• Use the t distribution table for the alpha value to get the required critical value.

How to Find the Critical Value Using a Confidence Interval for a Two-Tailed Z Test?

The steps to find the critical value using a confidence interval are as follows:

• Subtract the confident interval from 100% and convert the resultant into a decimal value to get the alpha level.
• Subtract this value from 1.
• Find the z value for the corresponding area using the normal distribution table to get the critical value.

Can a Critical Value be Negative?

If a left-tailed test is being conducted then the critical value will be negative. This is because the critical value will be to the left of the mean thus, making it negative.

How to Reject Null Hypothesis Based on Critical Value?

The rejection criteria for the null hypothesis is given as follows:

• Right-tailed test: Test statistic > critical value.
• Left-tailed test: Test statistic < critical value.
• Two-tailed test: Reject if the test statistic does not lie in the acceptance region.

P-Value vs. Critical Value: A Friendly Guide for Beginners

In the world of statistics, you may have come across the terms p-value and critical value . These concepts are essential in hypothesis testing, a process that helps you make informed decisions based on data. As you embark on your journey to understand the significance and applications of these values, don’t worry; you’re not alone. Many professionals and students alike grapple with these concepts, but once you get the hang of what they mean, they become powerful tools at your fingertips.

The main difference between p-value and critical value is that the p-value quantifies the strength of evidence against a null hypothesis, while the critical value sets a threshold for assessing the significance of a test statistic. Simply put, if your p-value is below the critical value, you reject the null hypothesis.

As you read on, you can expect to dive deeper into the definitions, applications, and interpretations of these often misunderstood statistical concepts. The remainder of the article will guide you through how p-values and critical values work in real-world scenarios, tips on interpreting their results, and potential pitfalls to avoid. By the end, you’ll have a clear understanding of their role in hypothesis testing, helping you become a more effective researcher or analyst.

Important Sidenote: We interviewed numerous data science professionals (data scientists, hiring managers, recruiters – you name it) and identified 6 proven steps to follow for becoming a data scientist. Read my article: ‘6 Proven Steps To Becoming a Data Scientist [Complete Guide] for in-depth findings and recommendations! – This is perhaps the most comprehensive article on the subject you will find on the internet!

Table of Contents

Understanding P-Value and Critical Value

When you dive into the world of statistics, it’s essential to grasp the concepts of P-value and critical value . These two values play a crucial role in hypothesis testing, helping you make informed decisions based on data. In this section, we will focus on the concept of hypothesis testing and how P-value and critical value relate to it.

Concept of Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a statistical technique used to analyze data and draw conclusions. You start by creating a null hypothesis (H0) and an alternative hypothesis (H1). The null hypothesis represents the idea that there is no significant effect or relationship between the variables being tested, while the alternative hypothesis claims that there is a significant effect or relationship.

To conduct a hypothesis test, follow these steps:

• Formulate your null and alternative hypotheses.
• Choose an appropriate statistical test and significance level (α).
• Collect and analyze your data.
• Calculate the test statistic and P-value.
• Compare the P-value to the critical value.

Now, let’s discuss how P-value and critical value come into play during hypothesis testing.

The P-value is the probability of observing a test statistic as extreme (or more extreme) than the one calculated if the null hypothesis were true. In simpler terms, it’s the likelihood of getting your observed results by chance alone. The lower the P-value, the more evidence you have against the null hypothesis.

Here’s what you need to know about P-values:

• A low P-value (typically ≤ 0.05) indicates that the null hypothesis is unlikely to be true.
• A high P-value (typically > 0.05) suggests that the observed results align with the null hypothesis.

Critical Value

The critical value is a threshold that defines whether the test statistic is extreme enough to reject the null hypothesis. It depends on the chosen significance level (α) and the specific statistical test being used. If the test statistic exceeds the critical value, you reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative.

To summarize:

• If the P-value ≤ critical value, reject the null hypothesis.
• If the P-value > critical value, fail to reject the null hypothesis (do not conclude that the alternative is true).

In conclusion, understanding P-value and critical value is crucial for hypothesis testing. They help you determine the significance of your findings and make data-driven decisions. By grasping these concepts, you’ll be well-equipped to analyze data and draw meaningful conclusions in a variety of contexts.

P-Value Essentials

Calculating and interpreting p-values is essential to understanding statistical significance in research. In this section, we’ll cover the basics of p-values and how they relate to critical values.

Calculating P-Values

A p-value represents the probability of obtaining a result at least as extreme as the observed data, assuming the null hypothesis is correct. To calculate a p-value, follow these steps:

• Define your null and alternative hypotheses.
• Determine the test statistic and its distribution.
• Calculate the observed test statistic based on your sample data.
• Find the probability of obtaining a test statistic at least as extreme as the observed value.

Let’s dive deeper into these steps:

• Step 1: Formulate the null hypothesis (H₀) and alternative hypothesis (H₁). The null hypothesis typically states that there is no effect or relationship between variables, while the alternative hypothesis suggests otherwise.
• Step 2: Determine your test statistic and its distribution. The choice of test statistic depends on your data and hypotheses. Some common test statistics include the t -test, z -test, or chi-square test.
• Step 3: Using your sample data, compute the test statistic. This value quantifies the difference between your sample data and the null hypothesis.
• Step 4: Find the probability of obtaining a test statistic at least as extreme as the observed value, under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true. This probability is the p-value .

Interpreting P-Values

Once you’ve calculated the p-value, it’s time to interpret your results. The interpretation depends on the pre-specified significance level (α) you’ve chosen. Here’s a simplified guideline:

• If p-value ≤ α , you can reject the null hypothesis.
• If p-value > α , you cannot reject the null hypothesis.

Keep in mind that:

• A lower p-value indicates stronger evidence against the null hypothesis.
• A higher p-value implies weaker evidence against the null hypothesis.

Remember that statistical significance (p-value ≤ α) does not guarantee practical or scientific significance. It’s essential not to take the p-value as the sole metric for decision-making, but rather as a tool to help gauge your research outcomes.

In summary, p-values are crucial in understanding and interpreting statistical research results. By calculating and appropriately interpreting p-values, you can deepen your knowledge of your data and make informed decisions based on statistical evidence.

Critical Value Essentials

In this section, we’ll discuss two important aspects of critical values: Significance Level and Rejection Region . Knowing these concepts helps you better understand hypothesis testing and make informed decisions about the statistical significance of your results.

Significance Level

The significance level , often denoted as α or alpha, is an essential part of hypothesis testing. You can think of it as the threshold for deciding whether your results are statistically significant or not. In general, a common significance level is 0.05 or 5% , which means that there is a 5% chance of rejecting a true null hypothesis.

To help you understand better, here are a few key points:

• The lower the significance level, the more stringent the test.
• Higher α-levels may increase the risk of Type I errors (incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis).
• Lower α-levels may increase the risk of Type II errors (failing to reject a false null hypothesis).

Rejection Region

The rejection region is the range of values that, if your test statistic falls within, leads to the rejection of the null hypothesis. This area depends on the critical value and the significance level. The critical value is a specific point that separates the rejection region from the rest of the distribution. Test statistics that fall in the rejection region provide evidence that the null hypothesis might not be true and should be rejected.

Here are essential points to consider when using the rejection region:

• Z-score : The z-score is a measure of how many standard deviations away from the mean a given value is. If your test statistic lies in the rejection region, it means that the z-score is significant.
• Rejection regions are tailored for both one-tailed and two-tailed tests.
• In a one-tailed test, the rejection region is either on the left or right side of the distribution.
• In a two-tailed test, there are two rejection regions, one on each side of the distribution.

By understanding and considering the significance level and rejection region, you can more effectively interpret your statistical results and avoid making false assumptions or claims. Remember that critical values are crucial in determining whether to reject or accept the null hypothesis.

Statistical Tests and Decision Making

When you’re comparing the means of two samples, a t-test is often used. This test helps you determine whether there is a significant difference between the means. Here’s how you can conduct a t-test:

• Calculate the t-statistic for your samples
• Determine the degrees of freedom
• Compare the t-statistic to a critical value from a t-distribution table

If the t-statistic is greater than the critical value, you can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference between the sample means. Some key points about t-test:

• Test statistic : In a t-test, the t-statistic is the key value that you calculate
• Sample : For a t-test, you’ll need two independent samples to compare

The Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) is another statistical test, often used when you want to compare the means of three or more treatment groups. With this method, you analyze the differences between group means and make decisions on whether the total variation in the dataset can be accounted for by the variance within the groups or the variance between the groups. Here are the main steps in conducting an ANOVA test:

• Calculate the F statistic
• Determine the degrees of freedom for between-groups and within-groups
• Compare the F statistic to a critical value from an F-distribution table

When the F statistic is larger than the critical value, you can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference among the treatment groups. Keep these points in mind for ANOVA tests:

• Treatment Groups : ANOVA tests require three or more groups to compare
• Observations : You need multiple observations within each treatment group

Confidence Intervals

Confidence intervals (CIs) are a way to estimate values within a certain range, with a specified level of confidence. They help to indicate the reliability of an estimated parameter, like the mean or difference between sample means. Here’s what you need to know about calculating confidence intervals:

• Determine the point estimate (e.g., sample mean or difference in means)
• Calculate the standard error
• Multiply the standard error by the appropriate critical value

The result gives you a range within which the true population parameter is likely to fall, with a certain level of confidence (e.g., 95%). Remember these insights when working with confidence intervals:

• Confidence Level : The confidence level is the probability that the true population parameter falls within the calculated interval
• Critical Value : Based on the specified confidence level, you’ll determine a critical value from a table (e.g., t-distribution)

Remember, using appropriate statistical tests, test statistics, and critical values will help you make informed decisions in your data analysis.

Comparing P-Values and Critical Values

Differences and Similarities

When analyzing data, you may come across two important concepts – p-values and critical values . While they both help determine the significance of a data set, they have some differences and similarities.

• P-values are probabilities, ranging from 0 to 1, indicating how likely it is a particular result could be observed if the null hypothesis is true. Lower p-values suggest the null hypothesis should be rejected, meaning the observed data is not due to chance alone.
• On the other hand, critical values are preset thresholds that decide whether the null hypothesis should be rejected or not. Results that surpass the critical value support adopting the alternative hypothesis.

The main similarity between p-values and critical values is their role in hypothesis testing. Both are used to determine if observed data provides enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis.

Applications in Geospatial Data Analysis

In the field of geospatial data analysis, p-values and critical values play essential roles in making data-driven decisions. Researchers like Hartmann, Krois, and Waske from the Department of Earth Sciences at Freie Universitaet Berlin often use these concepts in their e-Learning project SOGA.

To better understand the applications, let’s look at three main aspects:

• Spatial autocorrelation : With geospatial data, points might be related not only by their values but also by their locations. P-values can help assess spatial autocorrelation and recognize underlying spatial patterns.
• Geostatistical analysis : Techniques like kriging or semivariogram estimation depend on critical values and p-values to decide the suitability of a model. By finding the best fit model, geospatial data can be better represented, ensuring accurate and precise predictions.
• Comparing geospatial data groups : When comparing two subsets of data (e.g., mineral concentrations, soil types), p-values can be used in permutation tests or t-tests to verify if the observed differences are significant or due to chance.

In summary, when working with geospatial data analysis, p-values and critical values are crucial tools that enable you to make informed decisions about your data and its implications. By understanding the differences and similarities between the two concepts, you can apply them effectively in your geospatial data analysis journey.

Standard Distributions and Scores

In this section, we will discuss the Standard Normal Distribution and its associated scores, namely Z-Score and T-Statistic . These concepts are crucial in understanding the differences between p-values and critical values.

Standard Normal Distribution

The Standard Normal Distribution is a probability distribution that has a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. This distribution is crucial for hypothesis testing, as it helps you make inferences about your data based on standard deviations from the mean. Some characteristics of this distribution include:

• 68% of the data falls within ±1 standard deviation from the mean
• 95% of the data falls within ±2 standard deviations from the mean
• 99.7% of the data falls within ±3 standard deviations from the mean

The Z-Score is a measure of how many standard deviations away a data point is from the mean of the distribution. It is used to compare data points across different distributions with different means and standard deviations. To calculate the Z-Score, use the formula:

Key features of the Z-Score include:

• Positive Z-Scores indicate values above the mean
• Negative Z-Scores indicate values below the mean
• A Z-Score of 0 is equal to the mean

T-Statistic

The T-Statistic , also known as the Student’s t-distribution , is another way to assess how far away a data point is from the mean. It comes in handy when:

• You have a small sample size (generally less than 30)
• Population variance is not known
• Population is assumed to be normally distributed

The T-Statistic shares similarities with the Z-Score but adjusts for sample size, making it more appropriate for smaller samples. The formula for calculating the T-Statistic is:

In conclusion, understanding the Standard Normal Distribution , Z-Score , and T-Statistic will help you better differentiate between p-values and critical values, ultimately aiding in accurate statistical analysis and hypothesis testing.

Author’s Recommendations: Top Data Science Resources To Consider

Before concluding this article, I wanted to share few top data science resources that I have personally vetted for you. I am confident that you can greatly benefit in your data science journey by considering one or more of these resources.

• DataCamp: If you are a beginner focused towards building the foundational skills in data science , there is no better platform than DataCamp. Under one membership umbrella, DataCamp gives you access to 335+ data science courses. There is absolutely no other platform that comes anywhere close to this. Hence, if building foundational data science skills is your goal: Click Here to Sign Up For DataCamp Today!
• IBM Data Science Professional Certificate: If you are looking for a data science credential that has strong industry recognition but does not involve too heavy of an effort: Click Here To Enroll Into The IBM Data Science Professional Certificate Program Today! (To learn more: Check out my full review of this certificate program here )
• MITx MicroMasters Program in Data Science: If you are at a more advanced stage in your data science journey and looking to take your skills to the next level, there is no Non-Degree program better than MIT MicroMasters. Click Here To Enroll Into The MIT MicroMasters Program Today ! (To learn more: Check out my full review of the MIT MicroMasters program here )
• Roadmap To Becoming a Data Scientist: If you have decided to become a data science professional but not fully sure how to get started : read my article – 6 Proven Ways To Becoming a Data Scientist . In this article, I share my findings from interviewing 100+ data science professionals at top companies (including – Google, Meta, Amazon, etc.) and give you a full roadmap to becoming a data scientist.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the relationship between p-value and critical value.

The p-value represents the probability of observing the test statistic under the null hypothesis, while the critical value is a predetermined threshold for declaring significance. If the p-value is less than the critical value, you reject the null hypothesis.

How do you interpret p-value in comparison to critical value?

When the p-value is smaller than the critical value , there is strong evidence against the null hypothesis, which means you reject it. In contrast, if the p-value is larger, you fail to reject the null hypothesis and cannot conclude a significant effect.

What does it mean when the p-value is greater than the critical value?

If the p-value is greater than the critical value , it indicates that the observed data are consistent with the null hypothesis, and you do not have enough evidence to reject it. In other words, the finding is not statistically significant.

How are critical values used to determine significance?

Critical values are used as a threshold to determine if a test statistic is considered significant. When the test statistic is more extreme than the critical value, you reject the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed effect is unlikely due to chance alone.

Why is it important to know both p-value and critical value in hypothesis testing?

Knowing both p-value and critical value helps you to:

• Understand the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis
• Decide whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis
• Assess the statistical significance of your findings
• Avoid misinterpretations and false conclusions

How do you calculate critical values and compare them to p-values?

To calculate critical values, you:

• Choose a significance level (α)
• Determine the appropriate test statistic distribution
• Find the value that corresponds to α in the distribution

Then, you compare the calculated critical value with the p-value to determine if the result is statistically significant or not. If the p-value is less than the critical value, you reject the null hypothesis.

BEFORE YOU GO: Don’t forget to check out my latest article – 6 Proven Steps To Becoming a Data Scientist [Complete Guide] . We interviewed numerous data science professionals (data scientists, hiring managers, recruiters – you name it) and created this comprehensive guide to help you land that perfect data science job.

Affiliate Disclosure: We participate in several affiliate programs and may be compensated if you make a purchase using our referral link, at no additional cost to you. You can, however, trust the integrity of our recommendation. Affiliate programs exist even for products that we are not recommending. We only choose to recommend you the products that we actually believe in.

Daisy is the founder of DataScienceNerd.com. Passionate for the field of Data Science, she shares her learnings and experiences in this domain, with the hope to help other Data Science enthusiasts in their path down this incredible discipline.

Recent Posts

Is Data Science Going to be Automated and Replaced by AI?

Data science has been a buzzword in recent years, and with the rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, many wonder if data science as a field will be replaced by AI. As you...

Is Data Science/Analytics Saturated? [Detailed Exploration]

In the world of technology, there's always something new and exciting grabbing our attention. Data science and analytics, in particular, have exploded onto the scene, with many professionals flocking...

The Data Scientist

Understanding Critical Value vs. P-Value in Hypothesis Testing

In the realm of statistical analysis, critical values and p-values serve as essential tools for hypothesis testing and decision making. These concepts, rooted in the work of statisticians like Ronald Fisher and the Neyman-Pearson approach, play a crucial role in determining statistical significance. Understanding the distinction between critical values and p-values is vital for researchers and data analysts to interpret their findings accurately and avoid misinterpretations that can lead to false positives or false negatives.

This article aims to shed light on the key differences between critical values and p-values in hypothesis testing. It will explore the definition and calculation of critical values, including how to find critical values using tables or calculators. The discussion will also cover p-values, their interpretation, and their relationship to significance levels. Additionally, the article will address common pitfalls in result interpretation and provide guidance on when to use critical values versus p-values in various statistical scenarios, such as t-tests and confidence intervals.

What is a Critical Value?

Definition and concept.

A critical value in statistics serves as a crucial cut-off point in hypothesis testing and decision making. It defines the boundary between accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis, playing a vital role in determining statistical significance. The critical value is intrinsically linked to the significance level (α) chosen for the test, which represents the probability of making a Type I error.

Critical values are essential for accurately representing a range of characteristics within a dataset. They help statisticians calculate the margin of error and provide insights into the validity and accuracy of their findings. In hypothesis testing, the critical value is compared to the obtained test statistic to determine whether the null hypothesis should be rejected or not.

How to calculate critical values

Calculating critical values involves several steps and depends on the type of test being conducted. The general formula for finding the critical value is:

Critical probability (p*) = 1 – (Alpha / 2)

Where Alpha = 1 – (confidence level / 100)

For example, using a confidence level of 95%, the alpha value would be:

Alpha value = 1 – (95/100) = 0.05

Then, the critical probability would be:

Critical probability (p*) = 1 – (0.05 / 2) = 0.975

The critical value can be expressed in two ways:

• As a Z-score related to cumulative probability
• As a critical t statistic, which is equal to the critical probability

For larger sample sizes (typically n ≥ 30), the Z-score is used, while for smaller samples or when the population standard deviation is unknown, the t statistic is more appropriate.

Examples in hypothesis testing

Critical values play a crucial role in various types of hypothesis tests. Here are some examples:

• One-tailed test: For a right-tailed test with H₀: μ = 3 vs. H₁: μ > 3, the critical value would be the t-value such that the probability to the right of it is α. For instance, with α = 0.05 and 14 degrees of freedom, the critical value t₀.₀₅,₁₄ is 1.7613 . The null hypothesis would be rejected if the test statistic t is greater than 1.7613.
• Two-tailed test: For a two-tailed test with H₀: μ = 3 vs. H₁: μ ≠ 3, there are two critical values – one for each tail. Using α = 0.05 and 14 degrees of freedom, the critical values would be -2.1448 and 2.1448 . The null hypothesis would be rejected if the test statistic t is less than -2.1448 or greater than 2.1448.
• Z-test example: In a tire manufacturing plant producing 15.2 tires per hour with a variance of 2.5, new machines were tested. The critical region for a one-tailed test with α = 0.10 was z > 1.282. The calculated z-statistic of 3.51 exceeded this critical value , leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis.

Understanding critical values is essential for making informed decisions in hypothesis testing and statistical analysis. They provide a standardized approach to evaluating the significance of research findings and help researchers avoid misinterpretations that could lead to false positives or false negatives.

Understanding P-Values

Definition of p-value

In statistical hypothesis testing, a p-value is a crucial concept that helps researchers quantify the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis. The p-value is defined as the probability of obtaining test results at least as extreme as the observed results, assuming that the null hypothesis is true. This definition highlights the relationship between the p-value and the null hypothesis, which is fundamental to understanding its interpretation.

The p-value serves as an alternative to rejection points, providing the smallest level of significance at which the null hypothesis would be rejected. It is important to note that the p-value is not the probability that the null hypothesis is true or that the alternative hypothesis is false. Rather, it indicates how compatible the observed data are with a specified statistical model, typically the null hypothesis.

Interpreting p-values

Interpreting p-values correctly is essential for making sound statistical inferences. A smaller p-value suggests stronger evidence against the null hypothesis and in favor of the alternative hypothesis. Conventionally, a p-value of 0.05 or lower is considered statistically significant, leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis. However, it is crucial to understand that this threshold is arbitrary and should not be treated as a definitive cutoff point for decision-making.

When interpreting p-values, it is important to consider the following:

• The p-value does not indicate the size or importance of the observed effect. A small p-value can be observed for an effect that is not meaningful or important, especially with large sample sizes.
• The p-value is not the probability that the observed effects were produced by random chance alone. It is calculated under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true.
• A p-value greater than 0.05 does not necessarily mean that the null hypothesis is true or that there is no effect. It simply indicates that the evidence against the null hypothesis is not strong enough to reject it at the chosen significance level.

Common misconceptions about p-values

Despite their widespread use, p-values are often misinterpreted in scientific research and education. Some common misconceptions include:

• Interpreting the p-value as the probability that the null hypothesis is true or the probability that the alternative hypothesis is false. This interpretation is incorrect, as p-values do not provide direct probabilities for hypotheses.
• Believing that a p-value less than 0.05 proves that a finding is true or that the probability of making a mistake is less than 5%. In reality, the p-value is a statement about the relation of the data to the null hypothesis, not a measure of truth or error rates.
• Treating p-values on opposite sides of the 0.05 threshold as qualitatively different. This dichotomous thinking can lead to overemphasis on statistical significance and neglect of practical significance.
• Using p-values to determine the size or importance of an effect. P-values do not provide information about effect sizes or clinical relevance.

To address these misconceptions, it is important to consider p-values as continuous measures of evidence rather than binary indicators of significance. Additionally, researchers should focus on reporting effect sizes, confidence intervals, and practical significance alongside p-values to provide a more comprehensive understanding of their findings.

Key Differences Between Critical Values and P-Values

Approach to hypothesis testing

Critical values and p-values represent two distinct approaches to hypothesis testing, each offering unique insights into the decision-making process. The critical value approach, rooted in traditional hypothesis testing, establishes a clear boundary for accepting or rejecting the null hypothesis. This method is closely tied to significance levels and provides a straightforward framework for statistical inference.

In contrast, p-values offer a continuous measure of evidence against the null hypothesis. This approach allows for a more nuanced evaluation of the data’s compatibility with the null hypothesis. While both methods aim to support or reject the null hypothesis, they differ in how they lead to that decision.

Decision-making process

The decision-making process for critical values and p-values follows different paths. Critical values provide a binary framework, simplifying the decision to either reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis. This approach streamlines the process by classifying results as significant or not significant based on predetermined thresholds.

For instance, in a hypothesis test with a significance level (α) of 0.05 , the critical value serves as the dividing line between the rejection and non-rejection regions. If the test statistic exceeds the critical value, the null hypothesis is rejected.

P-values, on the other hand, offer a more flexible approach to decision-making. Instead of a simple yes or no answer, p-values present a range of evidence levels against the null hypothesis. This continuous scale allows researchers to interpret the strength of evidence and choose an appropriate significance level for their specific context.

Interpretation of results

The interpretation of results differs significantly between critical values and p-values. Critical values provide a clear-cut interpretation: if the test statistic falls within the rejection region defined by the critical value, the null hypothesis is rejected. This approach offers a straightforward way to communicate results, especially when a binary decision is required.

P-values, however, offer a more nuanced interpretation of results. A smaller p-value indicates stronger evidence against the null hypothesis. For example, a p-value of 0.03 suggests more compelling evidence against the null hypothesis than a p-value of 0.07. This continuous scale allows for a more detailed assessment of the data’s compatibility with the null hypothesis.

It’s important to note that while a p-value of 0.05 is often used as a threshold for statistical significance, this is an arbitrary cutoff. The interpretation of p-values should consider the context of the study and the potential for practical significance.

Both approaches have their strengths and limitations. Critical values simplify decision-making but may not accurately reflect the increasing precision of estimates as sample sizes grow. P-values provide a more comprehensive understanding of outcomes, especially when combined with effect size measures. However, they are frequently misunderstood and can be affected by sample size in large datasets, potentially leading to misleading significance.

In conclusion, while critical values and p-values are both essential tools in hypothesis testing, they offer different perspectives on statistical inference. Critical values provide a clear, binary decision framework, while p-values allow for a more nuanced evaluation of evidence against the null hypothesis. Understanding these differences is crucial for researchers to choose the most appropriate method for their specific research questions and to interpret results accurately.

When to Use Critical Values vs. P-Values

Advantages of critical value approach.

The critical value approach offers several advantages in hypothesis testing. It provides a simple, binary framework for decision-making, allowing researchers to either reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis. This method is particularly useful when a clear explanation of the significance of results is required. Critical values are especially beneficial in sectors where decision-making is influenced by predetermined thresholds, such as the commonly used 0.05 significance level.

One of the key strengths of the critical value approach is its consistency with accepted significance levels, which simplifies interpretation. This method is particularly valuable in non-parametric tests where distributional assumptions may be violated. The critical value approach involves comparing the observed test statistic to a predetermined cutoff value. If the test statistic is more extreme than the critical value, the null hypothesis is rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis.

Benefits of p-value method

The p-value method offers a more nuanced approach to hypothesis testing. It provides a continuous scale for evaluating the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis, allowing researchers to interpret data with greater flexibility. This approach is particularly useful when conducting unique or exploratory research, as it enables scientists to choose an appropriate level of significance based on their specific context.

P-values quantify the probability of observing a test statistic as extreme as, or more extreme than, the one observed, assuming the null hypothesis is true. This method provides a more comprehensive understanding of outcomes, especially when combined with effect size measures. For instance, a p-value of 0.0127 indicates that it is unlikely to observe such an extreme test statistic if the null hypothesis were true, leading to its rejection.

Choosing the right approach for your study

The choice between critical values and p-values depends on various factors, including the nature of the data , study design, and research objectives. Critical values are best suited for situations requiring a simple, binary choice about the null hypothesis. They streamline the decision-making process by classifying results as significant or not significant.

On the other hand, p-values are more appropriate when evaluating the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis on a continuous scale. They offer a more subtle understanding of the data’s significance and allow for flexibility in interpretation. However, it’s crucial to note that p-values have been subject to debate and controversy, particularly in the context of analyzing complex data associated with plant and animal breeding programs.

When choosing between these approaches, consider the following:

• If you need a clear-cut decision based on predetermined thresholds, the critical value approach may be more suitable.
• For a more nuanced interpretation of results, especially in exploratory research, the p-value method might be preferable.
• Consider the potential for misinterpretation and misuse associated with p-values, such as p-value hacking , which can lead to inflated significance and misleading conclusions.

Ultimately, the choice between critical values and p-values should be guided by the specific requirements of your study and the need for accurate statistical inferences to make informed decisions in your field of research.

Common Pitfalls in Interpreting Results

Overreliance on arbitrary thresholds.

One of the most prevalent issues in statistical analysis is the overreliance on arbitrary thresholds, particularly the p-value of 0.05. This threshold has been widely used for decades to determine statistical significance, but its arbitrary nature has come under scrutiny. Many researchers argue that setting a single threshold for all sciences is too extreme and can lead to misleading conclusions.

The use of p-values as the sole measure of significance can result in the publication of potentially false or misleading results. It’s crucial to understand that statistical significance does not necessarily equate to practical significance or real-world importance. A study with a large sample size can produce statistically significant results even when the effect size is trivial.

To address this issue, some researchers propose selecting and justifying p-value thresholds for experiments before collecting any data. These levels would be based on factors such as the potential impact of a discovery or how surprising it would be. However, this approach also has its critics, who argue that researchers may not have the incentive to use more stringent thresholds of evidence.

Ignoring effect sizes

Another common pitfall in interpreting results is the tendency to focus solely on statistical significance while ignoring effect sizes. Effect size is a crucial measure that indicates the magnitude of the relationship between variables or the difference between groups. It provides information about the practical significance of research findings, which is often more valuable than mere statistical significance.

Unlike p-values, effect sizes are independent of sample size. This means they offer a more reliable measure of the practical importance of a result, especially when dealing with large datasets. Researchers should report effect sizes alongside p-values to provide a comprehensive understanding of their findings.

It’s important to note that the criteria for small or large effect sizes may vary depending on the research field. Therefore, it’s essential to consider the context and norms within a particular area of study when interpreting effect sizes.

Misinterpreting statistical vs. practical significance

The distinction between statistical and practical significance is often misunderstood or overlooked in research. Statistical significance, typically determined by p-values, indicates the probability that the observed results occurred by chance. However, it does not provide information about the magnitude or practical importance of the effect.

Practical significance, on the other hand, refers to the real-world relevance or importance of the research findings. A result can be statistically significant but practically insignificant, or vice versa. For instance, a study with a large sample size might find a statistically significant difference between two groups, but the actual difference may be too small to have any meaningful impact in practice.

To avoid this pitfall, researchers should focus on both statistical and practical significance when interpreting their results. This involves considering not only p-values but also effect sizes, confidence intervals, and the potential real-world implications of the findings. Additionally, it’s crucial to interpret results in the context of the specific research question and field of study.

By addressing these common pitfalls, researchers can improve the quality and relevance of their statistical analyzes. This approach will lead to more meaningful interpretations of results and better-informed decision-making in various fields of study.

Critical values and p-values are key tools in statistical analysis, each offering unique benefits to researchers. These concepts help in making informed decisions about hypotheses and understanding the significance of findings. While critical values provide a clear-cut approach for decision-making, p-values offer a more nuanced evaluation of evidence against the null hypothesis. Understanding their differences and proper use is crucial to avoid common pitfalls in result interpretation.

Ultimately, the choice between critical values and p-values depends on the specific needs of a study and the context of the research. It’s essential to consider both statistical and practical significance when interpreting results, and to avoid overreliance on arbitrary thresholds. By using these tools wisely, researchers can enhance the quality and relevance of their statistical analyzes, leading to more meaningful insights and better-informed decisions. 

1. When should you use a critical value as opposed to a p-value in hypothesis testing?

When testing a hypothesis, compare the p-value directly with the significance level (α). If the p-value is less than α, reject the null hypothesis (H0); if it’s greater, do not reject H0. Conversely, using critical values allows you to determine whether the p-value is greater or less than α.

2. What does it mean if the p-value is less than the critical value?

If the p-value is lower than the critical value, you should reject the null hypothesis. Conversely, if the p-value is equal to or greater than the critical value, you should not reject the null hypothesis. Remember, a smaller p-value generally indicates stronger evidence against the null hypothesis.

3. What is the purpose of a critical value in statistical testing?

The critical value is a point on the test statistic that defines the boundaries of the acceptance or rejection regions for a statistical test. It helps in setting the threshold for what constitutes statistically significant results.

4. When should you reject the null hypothesis based on the critical value?

In the critical value approach, if the test statistic is more extreme than the critical value, reject the null hypothesis. If it is less extreme, do not reject the null hypothesis. This method helps in deciding the statistical significance of the test results.

Unlock the power of data science & AI with Tesseract Academy! Dive into our data science & AI courses to elevate your skills and discover endless possibilities in this new era.

• 8 Steps Toward Implementing Effective Data Governance
• Unlock the Secrets of Cyber Defense: Dive into Advanced Ethical Hacking and Penetration Testing Training Now
• Why XAIfinder Is Your Go-To Hub for the Best AI Tools in 2024
• Working With Data? Don’t Forget These 6 Cybersecurity Tips

Critical Value Calculator

Table of contents

Welcome to the critical value calculator! Here you can quickly determine the critical value(s) for two-tailed tests, as well as for one-tailed tests. It works for most common distributions in statistical testing: the standard normal distribution N(0,1) (that is when you have a Z-score), t-Student, chi-square, and F-distribution .

What is a critical value? And what is the critical value formula? Scroll down – we provide you with the critical value definition and explain how to calculate critical values in order to use them to construct rejection regions (also known as critical regions).

How to use critical value calculator

The critical value calculator is your go-to tool for swiftly determining critical values in statistical tests, be it one-tailed or two-tailed. To effectively use the calculator, follow these steps:

In the first field, input the distribution of your test statistic under the null hypothesis: is it a standard normal N (0,1), t-Student, chi-squared, or Snedecor's F? If you are not sure, check the sections below devoted to those distributions, and try to localize the test you need to perform.

In the field What type of test? choose the alternative hypothesis : two-tailed, right-tailed, or left-tailed.

If needed, specify the degrees of freedom of the test statistic's distribution. If you need more clarification, check the description of the test you are performing. You can learn more about the meaning of this quantity in statistics from the degrees of freedom calculator .

Set the significance level, α \alpha α . By default, we pre-set it to the most common value, 0.05, but you can adjust it to your needs.

The critical value calculator will display your critical value(s) and the rejection region(s).

For example, let's envision a scenario where you are conducting a one-tailed hypothesis test using a t-Student distribution with 15 degrees of freedom. You have opted for a right-tailed test and set a significance level (α) of 0.05. The results indicate that the critical value is 1.7531, and the critical region is (1.7531, ∞). This implies that if your test statistic exceeds 1.7531, you will reject the null hypothesis at the 0.05 significance level.

👩‍🏫 Want to learn more about critical values? Keep reading!

What is a critical value?

In hypothesis testing, critical values are one of the two approaches which allow you to decide whether to retain or reject the null hypothesis. The other approach is to calculate the p-value (for example, using the p-value calculator ).

The critical value approach consists of checking if the value of the test statistic generated by your sample belongs to the so-called rejection region , or critical region , which is the region where the test statistic is highly improbable to lie . A critical value is a cut-off value (or two cut-off values in the case of a two-tailed test) that constitutes the boundary of the rejection region(s). In other words, critical values divide the scale of your test statistic into the rejection region and the non-rejection region.

Once you have found the rejection region, check if the value of the test statistic generated by your sample belongs to it :

• If so, it means that you can reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis; and
• If not, then there is not enough evidence to reject H 0 .

But how to calculate critical values? First of all, you need to set a significance level , α \alpha α , which quantifies the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually correct. The choice of α is arbitrary; in practice, we most often use a value of 0.05 or 0.01. Critical values also depend on the alternative hypothesis you choose for your test , elucidated in the next section .

Critical value definition

To determine critical values, you need to know the distribution of your test statistic under the assumption that the null hypothesis holds. Critical values are then points with the property that the probability of your test statistic assuming values at least as extreme at those critical values is equal to the significance level α . Wow, quite a definition, isn't it? Don't worry, we'll explain what it all means.

First, let us point out it is the alternative hypothesis that determines what "extreme" means. In particular, if the test is one-sided, then there will be just one critical value; if it is two-sided, then there will be two of them: one to the left and the other to the right of the median value of the distribution.

Critical values can be conveniently depicted as the points with the property that the area under the density curve of the test statistic from those points to the tails is equal to α \alpha α :

Left-tailed test: the area under the density curve from the critical value to the left is equal to α \alpha α ;

Right-tailed test: the area under the density curve from the critical value to the right is equal to α \alpha α ; and

Two-tailed test: the area under the density curve from the left critical value to the left is equal to α / 2 \alpha/2 α /2 , and the area under the curve from the right critical value to the right is equal to α / 2 \alpha/2 α /2 as well; thus, total area equals α \alpha α .

As you can see, finding the critical values for a two-tailed test with significance α \alpha α boils down to finding both one-tailed critical values with a significance level of α / 2 \alpha/2 α /2 .

How to calculate critical values?

The formulae for the critical values involve the quantile function , Q Q Q , which is the inverse of the cumulative distribution function ( c d f \mathrm{cdf} cdf ) for the test statistic distribution (calculated under the assumption that H 0 holds!): Q = c d f − 1 Q = \mathrm{cdf}^{-1} Q = cdf − 1 .

Once we have agreed upon the value of α \alpha α , the critical value formulae are the following:

• Left-tailed test :
• Right-tailed test :
• Two-tailed test :

In the case of a distribution symmetric about 0 , the critical values for the two-tailed test are symmetric as well:

Unfortunately, the probability distributions that are the most widespread in hypothesis testing have somewhat complicated c d f \mathrm{cdf} cdf formulae. To find critical values by hand, you would need to use specialized software or statistical tables. In these cases, the best option is, of course, our critical value calculator! 😁

Z critical values

Use the Z (standard normal) option if your test statistic follows (at least approximately) the standard normal distribution N(0,1) .

In the formulae below, u u u denotes the quantile function of the standard normal distribution N(0,1):

Left-tailed Z critical value: u ( α ) u(\alpha) u ( α )

Right-tailed Z critical value: u ( 1 − α ) u(1-\alpha) u ( 1 − α )

Two-tailed Z critical value: ± u ( 1 − α / 2 ) \pm u(1- \alpha/2) ± u ( 1 − α /2 )

Check out Z-test calculator to learn more about the most common Z-test used on the population mean. There are also Z-tests for the difference between two population means, in particular, one between two proportions.

t critical values

Use the t-Student option if your test statistic follows the t-Student distribution . This distribution is similar to N(0,1) , but its tails are fatter – the exact shape depends on the number of degrees of freedom . If this number is large (>30), which generically happens for large samples, then the t-Student distribution is practically indistinguishable from N(0,1). Check our t-statistic calculator to compute the related test statistic.

In the formulae below, Q t , d Q_{\text{t}, d} Q t , d ​ is the quantile function of the t-Student distribution with d d d degrees of freedom:

Left-tailed t critical value: Q t , d ( α ) Q_{\text{t}, d}(\alpha) Q t , d ​ ( α )

Right-tailed t critical value: Q t , d ( 1 − α ) Q_{\text{t}, d}(1 - \alpha) Q t , d ​ ( 1 − α )

Two-tailed t critical values: ± Q t , d ( 1 − α / 2 ) \pm Q_{\text{t}, d}(1 - \alpha/2) ± Q t , d ​ ( 1 − α /2 )

Visit the t-test calculator to learn more about various t-tests: the one for a population mean with an unknown population standard deviation , those for the difference between the means of two populations (with either equal or unequal population standard deviations), as well as about the t-test for paired samples .

chi-square critical values (χ²)

Use the χ² (chi-square) option when performing a test in which the test statistic follows the χ²-distribution .

You need to determine the number of degrees of freedom of the χ²-distribution of your test statistic – below, we list them for the most commonly used χ²-tests.

Here we give the formulae for chi square critical values; Q χ 2 , d Q_{\chi^2, d} Q χ 2 , d ​ is the quantile function of the χ²-distribution with d d d degrees of freedom:

Left-tailed χ² critical value: Q χ 2 , d ( α ) Q_{\chi^2, d}(\alpha) Q χ 2 , d ​ ( α )

Right-tailed χ² critical value: Q χ 2 , d ( 1 − α ) Q_{\chi^2, d}(1 - \alpha) Q χ 2 , d ​ ( 1 − α )

Two-tailed χ² critical values: Q χ 2 , d ( α / 2 ) Q_{\chi^2, d}(\alpha/2) Q χ 2 , d ​ ( α /2 ) and Q χ 2 , d ( 1 − α / 2 ) Q_{\chi^2, d}(1 - \alpha/2) Q χ 2 , d ​ ( 1 − α /2 )

Several different tests lead to a χ²-score:

Goodness-of-fit test : does the empirical distribution agree with the expected distribution?

This test is right-tailed . Its test statistic follows the χ²-distribution with k − 1 k - 1 k − 1 degrees of freedom, where k k k is the number of classes into which the sample is divided.

Independence test : is there a statistically significant relationship between two variables?

This test is also right-tailed , and its test statistic is computed from the contingency table. There are ( r − 1 ) ( c − 1 ) (r - 1)(c - 1) ( r − 1 ) ( c − 1 ) degrees of freedom, where r r r is the number of rows, and c c c is the number of columns in the contingency table.

Test for the variance of normally distributed data : does this variance have some pre-determined value?

This test can be one- or two-tailed! Its test statistic has the χ²-distribution with n − 1 n - 1 n − 1 degrees of freedom, where n n n is the sample size.

F critical values

Finally, choose F (Fisher-Snedecor) if your test statistic follows the F-distribution . This distribution has a pair of degrees of freedom .

Let us see how those degrees of freedom arise. Assume that you have two independent random variables, X X X and Y Y Y , that follow χ²-distributions with d 1 d_1 d 1 ​ and d 2 d_2 d 2 ​ degrees of freedom, respectively. If you now consider the ratio ( X d 1 ) : ( Y d 2 ) (\frac{X}{d_1}):(\frac{Y}{d_2}) ( d 1 ​ X ​ ) : ( d 2 ​ Y ​ ) , it turns out it follows the F-distribution with ( d 1 , d 2 ) (d_1, d_2) ( d 1 ​ , d 2 ​ ) degrees of freedom. That's the reason why we call d 1 d_1 d 1 ​ and d 2 d_2 d 2 ​ the numerator and denominator degrees of freedom , respectively.

In the formulae below, Q F , d 1 , d 2 Q_{\text{F}, d_1, d_2} Q F , d 1 ​ , d 2 ​ ​ stands for the quantile function of the F-distribution with ( d 1 , d 2 ) (d_1, d_2) ( d 1 ​ , d 2 ​ ) degrees of freedom:

Left-tailed F critical value: Q F , d 1 , d 2 ( α ) Q_{\text{F}, d_1, d_2}(\alpha) Q F , d 1 ​ , d 2 ​ ​ ( α )

Right-tailed F critical value: Q F , d 1 , d 2 ( 1 − α ) Q_{\text{F}, d_1, d_2}(1 - \alpha) Q F , d 1 ​ , d 2 ​ ​ ( 1 − α )

Two-tailed F critical values: Q F , d 1 , d 2 ( α / 2 ) Q_{\text{F}, d_1, d_2}(\alpha/2) Q F , d 1 ​ , d 2 ​ ​ ( α /2 ) and Q F , d 1 , d 2 ( 1 − α / 2 ) Q_{\text{F}, d_1, d_2}(1 -\alpha/2) Q F , d 1 ​ , d 2 ​ ​ ( 1 − α /2 )

Here we list the most important tests that produce F-scores: each of them is right-tailed .

ANOVA : tests the equality of means in three or more groups that come from normally distributed populations with equal variances. There are ( k − 1 , n − k ) (k - 1, n - k) ( k − 1 , n − k ) degrees of freedom, where k k k is the number of groups, and n n n is the total sample size (across every group).

Overall significance in regression analysis . The test statistic has ( k − 1 , n − k ) (k - 1, n - k) ( k − 1 , n − k ) degrees of freedom, where n n n is the sample size, and k k k is the number of variables (including the intercept).

Compare two nested regression models . The test statistic follows the F-distribution with ( k 2 − k 1 , n − k 2 ) (k_2 - k_1, n - k_2) ( k 2 ​ − k 1 ​ , n − k 2 ​ ) degrees of freedom, where k 1 k_1 k 1 ​ and k 2 k_2 k 2 ​ are the number of variables in the smaller and bigger models, respectively, and n n n is the sample size.

The equality of variances in two normally distributed populations . There are ( n − 1 , m − 1 ) (n - 1, m - 1) ( n − 1 , m − 1 ) degrees of freedom, where n n n and m m m are the respective sample sizes.

Behind the scenes of the critical value calculator

I'm Anna, the mastermind behind the critical value calculator and a PhD in mathematics from Jagiellonian University .

The idea for creating the tool originated from my experiences in teaching and research. Recognizing the need for a tool that simplifies the critical value determination process across various statistical distributions, I built a user-friendly calculator accessible to both students and professionals. After publishing the tool, I soon found myself using the calculator in my research and as a teaching aid.

Trust in this calculator is paramount to me. Each tool undergoes a rigorous review process , with peer-reviewed insights from experts and meticulous proofreading by native speakers. This commitment to accuracy and reliability ensures that users can be confident in the content. Please check the Editorial Policies page for more details on our standards.

What is a Z critical value?

A Z critical value is the value that defines the critical region in hypothesis testing when the test statistic follows the standard normal distribution . If the value of the test statistic falls into the critical region, you should reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis.

How do I calculate Z critical value?

To find a Z critical value for a given confidence level α :

Check if you perform a one- or two-tailed test .

For a one-tailed test:

Left -tailed: critical value is the α -th quantile of the standard normal distribution N(0,1).

Right -tailed: critical value is the (1-α) -th quantile.

Two-tailed test: critical value equals ±(1-α/2) -th quantile of N(0,1).

No quantile tables ? Use CDF tables! (The quantile function is the inverse of the CDF.)

Verify your answer with an online critical value calculator.

Is a t critical value the same as Z critical value?

In theory, no . In practice, very often, yes . The t-Student distribution is similar to the standard normal distribution, but it is not the same . However, if the number of degrees of freedom (which is, roughly speaking, the size of your sample) is large enough (>30), then the two distributions are practically indistinguishable , and so the t critical value has practically the same value as the Z critical value.

What is the Z critical value for 95% confidence?

The Z critical value for a 95% confidence interval is:

• 1.96 for a two-tailed test;
• 1.64 for a right-tailed test; and
• -1.64 for a left-tailed test.

What distribution?

What type of test?

Degrees of freedom (d)

Significance level

The test statistic follows the t-distribution with d degrees of freedom.

T Critical Value: Definition, Formula, Interpretation, and Examples

When delving into the world of hypothesis testing in statistics, one term that you will frequently encounter is the " t critical value ." But what exactly does it mean, and why is it so important in the realm of statistical analysis? 

This article will break down the concept of the t critical value , explaining its definition, how to calculate it, and how to interpret its results with easy-to-understand examples.

What is t-critical value?

The t critical value is a key component in the world of hypothesis testing, which is a method statisticians use to test the validity of a claim or hypothesis. 

In simpler terms, when researchers want to understand if the difference between two groups is significant or just happened by chance, they use a t-test and, by extension, the t critical value .

Why is it called “t-critical value”?

The " t " in the t critical value comes from the t-distribution , which is a type of probability distribution. A probability distribution is essentially a graph that shows all possible outcomes of a particular situation and how likely each outcome is. 

The t-distribution is used when the sample size is small, and the population variance ( i.e., how spread out the data is ) is unknown.

The Formula for Calculating the T Critical Value:

The formula for calculating the t critical value is as follows:

\[t = \frac{(\bar{X}_1 - \bar{X}_2)}{(s_p \sqrt{\frac{2}{n}})}\]

• t = t critical value
• x̄ 1 and x̄ 2 = means (i.e., averages) of the two groups being compared.
• s = standard deviation of the sample (i.e., a measure of how spread out the data is). 
• n = sample size (i.e., the number of data points).

This formula helps to calculate the difference between the average values of the two groups, taking into account the variability of the data and the sample size.

Interpreting the T Critical Value:

Once the t critical value has been calculated, it can be compared to the t distribution to determine the significance of the results. 

• If the calculated t value falls within the critical region of the t distribution , we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference between the two groups. 
• If the t value falls outside the critical region, we fail to reject the null hypothesis , suggesting that there is not a significant difference between the two groups.

Imagine a teacher who wants to know if a new teaching method is more effective than the traditional method. They divide their students into two groups: one group is taught using the new method, and the other group is taught using the traditional method. After a test, they calculate the average scores of the two groups and use the t-test formula to find the t critical value .

If the t critical value is greater than the critical value from the t-distribution, the teacher can conclude that the new teaching method is significantly more effective than the traditional method.

How to calculate the t-critical value?

To calculate the t critical value , you will need the following information:

The level of significance (α): This is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true. Common levels of significance are 0.05 , 0.01 , and 0.10 .

The degrees of freedom (df): This value depends on the sample size and the type of t-test you are conducting. For a one-sample t-test, the degrees of freedom is equal to the sample size minus one (n - 1) . For a two-sample t-test , the degrees of freedom can be calculated using the formula:

\[df = \frac{\left(\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}\right)^2}{\frac{\left(\frac{s_1^2}{n_1}\right)^2}{n_1 - 1} + \frac{\left(\frac{s_2^2}{n_2}\right)^2}{n_2 - 1}}\]

• s 1 and s 2 are the standard deviations of the two samples
• n 1 and n 2  are the sample sizes.

The type of t-test: There are different types of t-tests , including one-sample, two-sample, and paired-sample t-tests . The type of t-test you are conducting will affect the degrees of freedom and the critical value.

Once you have this information, you can use a t-distribution table or statistical software to find the t-critical value . 

Note: A table is provided at the end of the article.

Solved problem:

Suppose you are conducting a study to compare the test scores of two different teaching methods. The collected data from two independent samples is:

• Sample 1 (Teaching Method A): n 1 = 25 students, mean test score x̄ 1 = 78, and standard deviation s 1 = 10.
• Sample 2 (Teaching Method B): n 2 = 3 0 students, mean test score x̄ 2 = 82 , and standard deviation s 2 = 12 .

You want to test the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference between the two teaching methods at a 0.05 level of significance.

Steps to Calculate the t Critical Value:

Step 1: Calculate the pooled standard deviation ( s p ).

\[s_p = \sqrt{\frac{{(n_1 - 1) s_1^2 + (n_2 - 1) s_2^2}}{{n_1 + n_2 - 2}}}\]

Substituting the values, we get:

\[s_p = \sqrt{\frac{{(25 - 1) 10^2 + (30 - 1) 12^2}}{{25 + 30 - 2}}}\]

\[s_p \approx 11.1\]

Step 2: Calculate the t-statistic:

\[t = \frac{{50 - 52}}{{11.1 \sqrt{\frac{2}{25}}}}\]

\[t \approx -0.4\]

Step 3: Determine the degrees of freedom (df) for a two-sample t-test:

Substitute the values:

\[df = \frac{\left(\frac{10^2}{25} + \frac{12^2}{30}\right)^2}{\frac{\left(\frac{10^2}{25}\right)^2}{25 - 1} + \frac{\left(\frac{12^2}{30}\right)^2}{30 - 1}}\]

\[df \approx 53\]

Step 4: Determine the critical t-value from the t-value table .

For a significance level of 0.05 (two-tailed test), and degrees of freedom (df) closest to 53 , you would look up the value in the table. In this case, let's say the critical value for 50 degrees of freedom at the 0.05 significance level is 2.009.

Step 5: Compare the calculated t-statistic to the critical t-value.

In this example, the calculated t-statistic ( -0.4 ) is less than the critical t-value ( 2.009 ), therefore we would fail to reject the null hypothesis. This means that there is no significant difference between the two sample means.

T-value table:

In this table, the leftmost column lists the degrees of freedom ( df ), and the top row lists the significance levels ( 0.10, 0.05, 0.025, 0.01, and 0.005 ). Each cell in the table contains the critical t-value for the corresponding degrees of freedom and significance level. 

Here is how you can find the t critical value using this t-distribution table:

• Find the row that corresponds to your degrees of freedom .
• Find the column that corresponds to your level of significance .
• The value where the row and column intersect is the t critical value .

For example, if you have 7 degrees of freedom and are conducting a test at the 0.05 significance level , the critical t-value is 1.895.

Conclusion:

By understanding the definition, formula, and interpretation of the t critical value, you will be better equipped to evaluate research studies and make informed decisions based on data. So, the next time you come across a study that uses a t-test, you'll know exactly what's going on!

Recent Blogs

F Critical Value: Definition, formula, and Calculations

Understanding z-score and z-critical value in statistics: A comprehensive guide

P-value: Definition, formula, interpretation, and use with examples

Criticalvaluecalculator.com is a free online service for students, researchers, and statisticians to find the critical values of t and z for right-tailed, left tailed, and two-tailed probability.

Information

• Privacy Policy
• Terms of Services

Quickonomics

Critical Value

Definition of critical value.

A critical value is a concept in statistics that plays a crucial role in hypothesis testing. It is a point on the distribution curve that separates the region where the null hypothesis is not rejected from the region where the null hypothesis can be rejected with confidence. In simpler terms, it is a threshold or cutoff value which, when crossed by the test statistic, indicates that the observed data is sufficiently unlikely under the null hypothesis. As such, the critical value is instrumental in determining the statistical significance of a test result.

Consider a scenario where a researcher is conducting a test to determine if a new drug is effective in lowering blood pressure more than the standard medication. The researcher sets up a hypothesis test with a significance level (alpha) of 0.05, aiming for a 95% confidence level.

The critical value(s) will depend on the nature of the test (one-tailed or two-tailed) and the distribution of the test statistic. If the test is two-tailed, there will be two critical values, one on each end of the distribution curve.

Using a standard normal distribution (Z-distribution), if the significance level is set at 0.05 for a two-tailed test, the critical values are approximately +/-1.96. That means if the test statistic (the calculated value from the experiment data) is greater than 1.96 or less than -1.96, the null hypothesis—that there is no difference in blood pressure reduction between the two medications—can be rejected.

Why Critical Value Matters

Understanding and correctly determining the critical value is essential in hypothesis testing because it directly influences the conclusion of the test. It helps statisticians and researchers decide whether the evidence against the null hypothesis is strong enough to reject it, thus providing a clear criterion for decision-making based on statistical data.

Critical values are pivotal in ensuring that the rate of Type I errors (false positives) does not exceed the chosen significance level. By maintaining control over the probabilities of such errors, researchers can retain confidence in the reliability and validity of their test results. This process underscores the importance of critical values in the scientific method, enabling evidence-based conclusions and decision-making.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

How do you find the critical value.

Critical values are determined based on the significance level (alpha), the type of test (one-tailed or two-tailed), and the distribution of the test statistic (e.g., Z-distribution for normal datasets, t-distribution for small samples). They can be found using statistical tables or computed using statistical software by specifying the desired confidence level or significance level.

Are critical values and p-values the same?

No, critical values and p-values serve different purposes in hypothesis testing. The critical value is a cutoff point used to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis, whereas the p-value is the probability of observing a test statistic at least as extreme as the one observed, given that the null hypothesis is true. If the p-value is less than or equal to the significance level, the null hypothesis is rejected.

Can critical values change?

Yes, the critical value can change depending on the specifics of the hypothesis test being conducted. Factors that can alter the critical value include the chosen significance level (alpha), the nature of the test (one-tailed vs. two-tailed), and the distribution applicable to the test statistic (e.g., Z-distribution, t-distribution). The critical value adjusts to maintain the probability of a Type I error at the predetermined significance level.

Critical values are a fundamental component of hypothesis testing, playing a vital role in determining the threshold for statistical significance. By carefully selecting and applying critical values, researchers can make informed decisions based on their data, ensuring the integrity and reliability of their scientific conclusions.

To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.

Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.