animal testing should be banned essay conclusion

Animal Testing should be Banned

This essay will argue against the use of animal testing, discussing ethical, scientific, and practical reasons for its prohibition. It will examine the moral implications of using animals for research, the pain and suffering inflicted, and the issue of animal rights. The piece will also discuss alternatives to animal testing, such as in vitro methods and computer modeling, and how these can be more effective, humane, and economical. The essay aims to advocate for a shift in scientific research towards more ethical and sustainable practices. Also at PapersOwl you can find more free essay examples related to Animal Testing.

How it works

Many organizations are debating whether animal testing ought to be banned in the U. S. Some believe that animal testing ought to be done. At the same time, others believe that animal testing is completely wrong. Some experts believe that other options can be available instead of doing the test on animals. Using animals to test the safety of certain products and for medical research purposes is wrong, and it should be made a point that the pain and suffering forced on the animals are just not worth it.

Animal testing is a growing debate in today’s society (1).

Animal testing entails scientists’ usage of a variety of goods, immunizations, or other items that are developed for people but are also used on animals. The most common animals used in scientific research include rats, birds, and amphibians; however, scientists do make use of other species. The operations frequently result in a significant amount of pain and distress for each individual animal. At the conclusion of an experiment, the vast majority of animals are killed, but some of them may be put to use in further research. Animal testing grew simultaneously with industrialization. It’s important to remember that the knowledge gained. The welfare of millions of people has been improved thanks to experiments and research using animals. Testing on animals has always been contentious, and this continues to be the case today because researchers need to do experiments on animals in order to discover potentially life-saving therapies and medicines for people. As a result, an unimaginably high number of defenseless creatures are being brutally put to death.

The utilization of animals in research makes it simpler for scientists to identify which medicines and therapies are safe and effective for human consumption. The primary reason that pharmaceuticals and therapies are initially tested on animals is that some treatments and medications are damaging to the lives of people and can lead to people’s death if they are not tested on animals first. Drugs that have been subjected to animal testing are responsible for the deaths of thousands of people annually. The truth is that most animal studies don’t contribute to improving human health, and the value of the role that animal testing serves in most technological advances in medicine is questionable. (2). Further investigation has shown that many medications that appear effective and safe in animals, inflicting no effect on the animals, actually fail or cause substantial injury, or perhaps even death, in people. This is because animal organs cannot be confused with human ones, and they have their own unique identification. They argue that animals cannot be relied upon as subjects since their bodies are too different from those of people. Because animals’ organs, neurological systems, and cellular constitution are so distinct from one another, any knowledge gained from doing experiments on them would be misleading. The information gained from these tests would be of little benefit to humans, in addition to being extremely harmful to the animals involved (3).

Drug testing on animals serves no practical use for science. It breaks my heart to see animals being forced to perform behaviors they don’t comprehend. Using animals in experiments is a cruel and unfair activity that has bad outcomes for everyone concerned. Diseases that affect humans, such as heart disease, numerous types of cancer, HIV, and others, cannot be passed on to animals. Experimental results in animals cannot be extrapolated to human behavior because of essential differences in morphology, physiology, and metabolism. They disagree with the concept of animal rights and believe that humans have no moral grounding in exploiting animals for material gain (4). Some of these defenseless animals are killed by being smothered by poisonous gases, being paralyzed in restraints for long periods of time, having holes punched in their skulls, having their skin scorched off, or having their spinal cords crushed. It’s cruel and pointless to test on animals. Unspeakable things can happen during the testing. One method is to slowly drip the substance under test into the eye of a rabbit until the animal’s cornea corrodes. One such method requires killing off at least half of the animals fed the component of interest (5). There is a heated discussion happening right now in the U. S. over doing tests on these poor, defenseless animals.

Costing more money and wasting resources, animal testing is unnecessary. There’s also the fact that it’s pointless to do so. Due to their inaccuracy and inability to predict the complete range of negative effects, animals are horrible test subjects for a chemical’s safety. Animals should have legal protection from this kind of abuse. In many instances, medical discoveries are delayed as researchers vainly waste time, money, effort, and animal lives trying to create an animal model of human disease (6). Animal testing generally costs enormous amounts of money, as the animals must be fed, cared for, housed, and treated with drugs or a similar experimental substance. Additionally, the price of the animals themselves must also be paid for. There are companies in the United States who actually breed animals specifically for the cause of testing, and animals can be purchased from them as well. Not only is this research cruel, but the billions of dollars wasted on animal studies funnels money away from human-based research that entails computer modeling and tissue cultures that could be helping people (5).

The use of animals in experimenting with human-based products has been debatable for a while now. It should be noted that sometimes the benefit of successful animal research is. However, it is important to acknowledge that each animal undergoing the process endures agony and death, no matter the final result. Both animals and humans have the capacity for emotion, cognition, behavior, and the feeling of physical pain. However, animals are afforded a certain respect as humans. Animals’ rights are violated when used in research because they are not given a choice. They just put straight under the penalty of an experiment for the health of humans. Humans cannot make life better for themselves by torturing and executing so many animals each year to perform laboratory experiments or to test products on them.

• Nurunnabi ASM, Afroz RD, Alam SN. Ethical Debate on Animal Research. Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics. 2013 Dec 20;4(3):11–8.
• Doke SK, Dhawale SC. Alternatives to animal testing: A review. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. 2015 Jul;23(3):223–9.
• Balls M, Bailey J, Combes RD. How viable are alternatives to animal testing in determining the toxicities of therapeutic drugs? Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology. 2019 Nov 21;15(12):985–7.
• Karaim R. Protecting Animals [Internet]. CQ Researcher by CQ Press. 2018. Available from: https://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/document.php?id=cqresrre2018071300
• Toronto. Time to end animal testing of cosmetics | The Star [Internet]. thestar.com. thestar.com; 2018. Available from: https://www.thestar.com/opinion/letters_to_the_editors/2018/06/30/time-to-end-animal-testing-of-cosmetics.html
• Humane Society International. Limitations of Animal Tests – Humane Society International [Internet]. Humane Society International. 2019. Available from: https://www.hsi.org/news-media/limitations-of-animal-tests/

Cite this page

Animal Testing Should Be Banned. (2020, May 13). Retrieved from https://papersowl.com/examples/animal-testing-should-be-banned/

"Animal Testing Should Be Banned." PapersOwl.com , 13 May 2020, https://papersowl.com/examples/animal-testing-should-be-banned/

PapersOwl.com. (2020). Animal Testing Should Be Banned . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/animal-testing-should-be-banned/ [Accessed: 18 Nov. 2024]

"Animal Testing Should Be Banned." PapersOwl.com, May 13, 2020. Accessed November 18, 2024. https://papersowl.com/examples/animal-testing-should-be-banned/

"Animal Testing Should Be Banned," PapersOwl.com , 13-May-2020. [Online]. Available: https://papersowl.com/examples/animal-testing-should-be-banned/. [Accessed: 18-Nov-2024]

PapersOwl.com. (2020). Animal Testing Should Be Banned . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/animal-testing-should-be-banned/ [Accessed: 18-Nov-2024]

Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade

Hire a writer to get a unique paper crafted to your needs.

Our writers will help you fix any mistakes and get an A+!

Please check your inbox.

You can order an original essay written according to your instructions.

Trusted by over 1 million students worldwide

1. Tell Us Your Requirements

2. Pick your perfect writer

3. Get Your Paper and Pay

Hi! I'm Amy, your personal assistant!

Don't know where to start? Give me your paper requirements and I connect you to an academic expert.

short deadlines

100% Plagiarism-Free

Certified writers

ESSAY SAUCE

FOR STUDENTS : ALL THE INGREDIENTS OF A GOOD ESSAY

Essay: Should animal testing be banned?

Essay details and download:.

• Subject area(s): Sociology essays
• Reading time: 4 minutes
• Price: Free download
• Published: 27 July 2024*
• Last Modified: 30 July 2024
• File format: Text
• Words: 978 (approx)
• Number of pages: 4 (approx)
• Tags: Animal testing essays

Text preview of this essay:

This page of the essay has 978 words.

Animal cruelty is a term that evokes strong emotional responses and ethical concerns. At the heart of this issue lies animal testing, a practice deeply entrenched in scientific research and product safety assurance. Despite its controversial nature, animal testing remains a critical component of biomedical research , contributing significantly to medical advancements and safety evaluations. This essay will delve into the ethical implications, scientific rationale, and potential alternatives to animal testing, ultimately arguing for a balanced approach that prioritizes both scientific progress and animal welfare.

The Prevalence and Necessity of Animal Testing

In the United States alone, approximately 16 million animals are subjected to various forms of testing annually to ensure the safety and efficacy of products used by humans . This statistic underscores the extensive reliance on animal models in research and development. The practice is not confined to the U.S.; other leading countries in animal testing include China, Japan, Canada, Australia, South Korea, the UK, Brazil, Germany, and France . These nations collectively contribute to a global effort to understand and mitigate health risks associated with new products and technologies.

The Scientific Framework of Animal Testing

The process of developing vaccines and medicines is a rigorous and multi-phase endeavor. Once researchers identify a potential vaccine candidate, preclinical trials are mandatory before any human testing can commence. These trials typically begin with in vitro studies using cells and tissues. Promising candidates from these studies are then subjected to animal testing to evaluate their safety and efficacy in a living organism.

Animal testing in preclinical trials serves several critical functions:

• Toxicity Assessment : Determining the potential toxic effects of a substance on different tissues is crucial. This step ensures that the product does not cause unintended harm when administered to humans.
• Immune Response Evaluation : Researchers need to understand the type and strength of the immune response elicited by a vaccine. Animal models provide a vital proxy for predicting human immune reactions.
• Efficacy Determination : The ultimate goal of any medical intervention is to prevent or treat disease. Animal testing helps establish whether a vaccine or drug can effectively achieve this goal.

The choice of animal species for testing depends on the disease and the biological similarities to humans. Commonly used animals include mice, rats, and monkeys. After successful animal trials, the vaccine or drug progresses to human clinical trials, starting with Phase I, which involves a small group of healthy volunteers .

Ethical Considerations and the Case for Animal Testing

The ethical debate surrounding animal testing is multifaceted. On one hand, the welfare of animals is a significant concern. Critics argue that subjecting animals to testing is inherently cruel and inhumane. They emphasize the moral responsibility to treat animals with dignity and respect, advocating for alternative methods that do not involve animal suffering .

However, proponents of animal testing argue that it is a necessary evil, essential for ensuring human safety and advancing medical knowledge. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the critical role of animal testing in developing safe and effective vaccines. Animal studies were pivotal in understanding the potential risks and benefits of various vaccine candidates before human trials commenced .

Animal testing also extends beyond biomedical research to include the safety evaluation of cosmetics, household cleaners, and other consumer products. The underlying rationale is the same: to prevent harm to humans by identifying potential hazards early in the development process .

Alternatives to Animal Testing: Promises and Limitations

Advancements in science and technology have led to the development of alternative methods that could potentially reduce the reliance on animal testing. These alternatives include:

• In Vitro Testing : Using cultured cells and tissues to assess the safety and efficacy of substances. While promising, in vitro methods cannot fully replicate the complexity of a living organism.
• Computer Modeling : Sophisticated computer simulations can predict how substances might interact with biological systems. However, these models are only as good as the data and algorithms that power them, and they often require validation through animal testing.
• Organs-on-Chips : Microfluidic devices that mimic the functions of human organs. These devices offer a more accurate representation of human physiology than traditional cell cultures but are still in the experimental stage and not yet widely adopted.

Despite these advancements, none of these alternatives can entirely replace animal testing at this time. Each method has its limitations and often needs to be used in conjunction with animal studies to provide comprehensive safety and efficacy data .

A Balanced Approach: Ethical and Scientific Considerations

Given the current state of scientific knowledge and technological capabilities, a balanced approach to animal testing is necessary. This approach should prioritize the Three Rs: Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement.

• Replacement : Whenever possible, non-animal methods should be used to achieve the same scientific objectives. Continued investment in research and development of alternative methods is crucial.
• Reduction : The number of animals used in experiments should be minimized by employing more efficient study designs and advanced statistical techniques.
• Refinement : Experimental procedures should be refined to minimize pain and distress for the animals involved. This includes improving living conditions and using anesthesia and analgesia when appropriate.

Animal testing remains a contentious issue, balancing ethical considerations with scientific necessity. While significant strides have been made in developing alternatives, animal testing continues to play a vital role in ensuring the safety and efficacy of medical and consumer products. A nuanced approach that incorporates ethical principles, advances in alternative testing methods, and stringent regulations can help mitigate the ethical concerns while preserving the scientific benefits of animal testing. By fostering a collaborative effort among scientists, ethicists, and policymakers, we can strive towards a future where animal suffering is minimized, and human health and safety are maximized.

The continued evolution of both scientific practices and ethical standards is essential in addressing the complex issue of animal testing. Only through such an integrated approach can we hope to achieve a balance that respects the welfare of animals while advancing human health and safety.

Discover more:

• Animal testing essays

Related essays:

• Animal rights and PETA – past, present and future
• Animal testing
• The Negative Effects of Animal Testing
• Animal Cruelty in Testing
• Introduction to laboratory animal science ethics

Recommended for you

• Using animals or embryonic stem cells – which has fewer ethical issues?
• The Controversies Surrounding Animal Rights: A Philosophical Perspective
• Treatment of animals in animal agriculture farms (public opinion piece)

About this essay:

If you use part of this page in your own work, you need to provide a citation, as follows:

Essay Sauce, Should animal testing be banned? . Available from:<https://www.essaysauce.com/sociology-essays/should-animal-testing-be-banned/> [Accessed 18-11-24].

These Sociology essays have been submitted to us by students in order to help you with your studies.

* This essay may have been previously published on EssaySauce.com and/or Essay.uk.com at an earlier date than indicated.

Essay Categories:

• Accounting essays
• Architecture essays
• Business essays
• Computer science essays
• Criminology essays
• Economics essays
• Education essays
• Engineering essays
• English language essays
• Environmental studies essays
• Essay examples
• Finance essays
• Geography essays
• Health essays
• History essays
• Hospitality and tourism essays
• Human rights essays
• Information technology essays
• International relations
• Leadership essays
• Linguistics essays
• Literature essays
• Management essays
• Marketing essays
• Mathematics essays
• Media essays
• Medicine essays
• Military essays
• Miscellaneous essays
• Music Essays
• Nursing essays
• Philosophy essays
• Photography and arts essays
• Politics essays
• Project management essays
• Psychology essays
• Religious studies and theology essays
• Sample essays
• Science essays
• Social work essays
• Sociology essays
• Sports essays
• Types of essay
• Uncategorised
• Zoology essays

Animal Testing: Should Animal Testing Be Allowed? — Argumentative Essay

Animal testing: introduction, animal testing: debatable questions, animal testing: conclusion.

Animal testing denotes the use of animals in medical experiments to unveil the potency, safety, toxicity, and viability of developed drugs. Concurrently, the phenomenon also applies to other biological experiments, which utilize animals as specimens. The method incorporates the administration of pharmaceutical compounds into biological systems (test animals).

This usually occurs for scientific purposes and medical developments. The process is debatable and has been disputed by animal activists, religious groups, and ethical communities who believe that the trend is immoral and inappropriate since animals cannot be compared with human beings (Panza & Potthast, 2010).

Animal testing usually involve vertebrates like rodents, cats, dogs, birds, and Guinea pigs among others. Since this is a disputable phenomenon, where one can argue for or against the act, this paper supports the aspects of animal testing with bountiful reasons based on its viability in investigating pharmacological compounds. Without animal testing, numerous drugs, which currently help the humankind, could have missed.

Since human beings cannot commence crude pharmaceutical investigations as test specimens, using test animals is significant in this context. It is advisable to execute scientific investigations elsewhere before introducing them into human beings. It is crucial to agree that animal testing might be unethical phenomenon as argued by some groups; nonetheless, it should continue following its merits and contributions to the humankind in the realms of drug investigations and scientific discoveries.

With regard to animal testing, debatable questions emerge. In this paper, “Should animal testing be abandoned due to ethical claims surrounding it?” forms the debated question. This question tries to unveil whether it is viable for biologists and medical scientists to cease from using animals for experimental investigations.

Despite the conventional use of these animals in numerous scientific experiments, it is still debatable on their viability and potency. Arguably, the animal testing phenomenon should continue with regard to scientific investigations.

The need for efficacy, safety, novelty, and certainty in the realms of drug-use require thorough investigative experiments, which can only materialize when test animals are incorporated. Firstly, some animal have systems that resemble those of human beings; thus, the ability to use such animals give a broader chance of executing an elaborate experimental investigation.

Using animals as representative of humans is a critical phenomenon when scrutinized critically. There are numerous individuals who have disputed this claim as stated in the research question. The desire to continue with the animal testing phenomenon has infuriated numerous activists who are against it (Panza & Potthast, 2010).

Nonetheless, it is evident and appropriate that this phenomenon should continue for further discoveries to be realized. It is questionable how further medical research will occur and how this will materialize without the use of test animals. This is an impossible phenomenon, which demands those who are arguing against animal testing to reconsider their stands.

Another issue is that human beings cannot be used as experimental animals. The drugs administered into humans must be of some quality, minimized toxicity, viable to use, potent, safe, and effective. This means that they have been investigated and approved by the concerned bodies after scientific investigations. If animal testing will be abandoned, no effective experimentation will occur on biological vessels.

Evidently, invitro (using experimental tubes) experimentations are slow and incomprehensive. This means that scientific investigations will delay and sometimes results might not occur. It is vital to consider that animal testing has helped significantly since its inception several decades ago. It has remained a viable, trusted, and considerable experimental design for pharmaceutical products and other scientific investigations.

Harrison & Hester (2006), which identifies alternative of animal testing, agrees that attaining an alternative of this trend is daunting and minimally achievable. Scientific considerations support this trend since there are limited alternatives to replace the method comprehensively (Harrison & Hester, 2006).

Those who are against animal testing claim that animals are not human beings and equating the two is inconsiderable. Evidently, animal are not exact copies of humans. There are numerous differences noticeable amidst the two factions. Additionally, they argue that what works best in a guinea pig (an experimental animal), might not exactly perform in humans.

The two factions (humans and test animals) are different hence the assumption that they can emulate each other is misled. Notably, this argument is understandable; however, as the situation stands, it is still appropriate to conduct animal testing to help in research investigations. Humans can hardly be used for crude or undeveloped researches as the ones done with test animals. This means that animal testing is still the best option.

According to Schmidt (2001), which discusses the aspects of animal testing, recognizes that it is important to infer that what is inconsumable for test animals is similarly consumable for humans. It is possible to note the adverse effects of drugs with animals, make appropriate changes in the composition of the tested drug, and later emerge with effective, safe, and potent compound worth human utilization.

Watson (2009), which describes the ethical issues related to animal testing, argues that some ethical claims behind the animal testing are baseless when compared to human lives saved daily due to animal testing executed to investigate proper and effective drugs. A mere claim that it is immoral to inject or administer unworthy compounds into an innocent animal while doing research is superfluous. This simply means that those who are against animal testing hardly want researches to be done using animals.

This is good and considerable; however, these very people hardly provide viable alternatives that can work better compared to the conventional animal testing provisions. Besides, they are also among those who gain from the findings and results achieved from such investigations. Evidently, almost all drugs currently used in the world at one point passed through animal testing to unveil their viability, safety, efficacy, toxicity levels, and other viable provisions demanded in this context.

Concurrently, it is inappropriate to abandon animal testing as claimed by the activists. The current discoveries on genetics, reproduction, developmental biology, and study of behaviors among others could have not materialized minus animal testing.

Additionally, there are other viable provisions that characterize the phenomenon besides the known pharmaceutical investigations which usually occur using test animals as stipulated before. In these mentioned fields, there are still considerable knowledge gaps that will necessitate further application of animal testing in order to unveil additional information.

This phenomenon can hardly occur minus animal testing since there will be no specimens for further research. The ethical claims fronted by the mentioned activists should cease from hindering further investigations (Watson, 2009). It is evident that discoveries made from animal testing are numerous and helpful to the human race as indicated earlier. The need for more investigations and application of animal testing will continue to exist following its viability, applicability, and reliability in the aspects of research.

The viewpoint that animals equally have moral rights is evident; however, it is disputable in this context since it acts as a hindrance to lucrative investigations and discoveries that are helpful to the humankind. Hayhurst (2000), which debates on animal rights, denotes that individuals who perceive animal as having rights are equally accurate in their opinions; nonetheless, they should also consider the merits of animal testing to their lives and beyond.

This relates to the ethical arguments posted with regard to this topic. It forms the center of argument from various people. It is crucial to denote that animal testing has numerous provisions worth noting in varying contexts. This relates to its viability and potency in unveiling the less investigated claims with regard to life. According to various sources, some arguments regarding the aspects of animal testing are invalid and misleading (Hayhurst, 2000). They simply emerge from undue compassion for animals.

This contributes to why this paper agrees with the continuity of animal testing. Precisely, its merits surpass its baseless flaws numerous times. It is recommendable to scrutinize these arguments before they derail the realities that encompass a given matter. It is crucial to consider such provisions following their viability in this context.

Additionally, those who argue against animal testing claim that such animals lack the capacity to express themselves hence can hardly show their pain, dissatisfaction, and suffering.

This is a critical claim; however, it is not enough to support the ban against animal testing. Conversely, scientists, medics, and biologists who use such animals apply moral aspects to their undertakings; hence, will barely intend to harm such experimental animals. Since such ethical observations are carried out within the mentioned experimental testing, it is considerable to continue with the animal testing phenomenon. Adjusting the conditions of these tests might equally help in upholding the ethical demands.

Another argument is that animal testing simplifies and speeds the experimental designs meant to make discoveries. This could have not been achievable minus such experimental trends. Testing developed research products on animals elicit the desired results with promptness. It is daunting and time consuming to develop therapeutic and diagnostic compounds from human beings. This relates to the aspects of delay claimed earlier.

Scientists will not be able to attain their demands in time. This might discourage them from continuing with investigations. Since the use of animal testing provides instant results, its application is widespread, applicable, and viable in numerous contexts. The aspects of safety indicated earlier in these claims equally contribute to the applicability of animal testing. It is improper to execute unsafe experiments or unverified drugs on humans.

The repercussions might be devastating than when it was applied on test animals (Schmidt, 2001). For example, developments and investigations on HIV drugs cannot occur on humans at their initial stages. It is advisable to develop them through animal testing before rendering them usable by humans. It is possible to adjust the composition of the given compound to unveil its viable concentrations. Emerging with instant results supports the application of animal testing and contributes massively in this context.

Animal testing is a helpful phenomenon in biological, medical, and other scientific investigations demanding its incorporation. The phenomenon is helpful, viable, and should be embraced despite the opposing opinions. Animal testing helps in developing effective, safe, viable, qualitative, and less toxic drugs. Following the merits of animal testing, its application and advancements should continue while observing ethical concerns.

Harrison, R. & Hester, R. (2006). Alternatives to Animal Testing . Ohio, OH: Cengage Learning.

Hayhurst, C. (2000). Animal testing: The animal rights debate . New York, NY: Rosen Pub. Group.

Panza, C. & Potthast, A. (2010). Ethics For Dummies . Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

Schmidt, A. (2001). Animal testing in infectiology . Basel: Karger.

Watson, S. (2009). Animal testing: Issues and ethics . New York, NY: Rosen Pub.

• Large Animal Rescue Process
• Human Activities and their Impact on Species Extinction in Arctic
• Has the Internet Positively or Negatively Impacted Human Society? Argumentative Essay
• Pros and Cons of Abortion to the Society Argumentative Essay
• Enhancement Drugs in Sports Should Be Banned: An Argumentative Paper
• Utilitarianism for Animals: Testing and Experimentation
• Burmese Pythons
• Grass Fed versus Grain and Corn Fed Animals
• Use of Animals in Biological Testing
• The Impact of Burmese Pythons on Florida’s Native Biodiversity
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2018, November 6). Animal Testing: Should Animal Testing Be Allowed? — Argumentative Essay. https://ivypanda.com/essays/animal-testing-argumentative-essay/

"Animal Testing: Should Animal Testing Be Allowed? — Argumentative Essay." IvyPanda , 6 Nov. 2018, ivypanda.com/essays/animal-testing-argumentative-essay/.

IvyPanda . (2018) 'Animal Testing: Should Animal Testing Be Allowed? — Argumentative Essay'. 6 November.

IvyPanda . 2018. "Animal Testing: Should Animal Testing Be Allowed? — Argumentative Essay." November 6, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/animal-testing-argumentative-essay/.

1. IvyPanda . "Animal Testing: Should Animal Testing Be Allowed? — Argumentative Essay." November 6, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/animal-testing-argumentative-essay/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Animal Testing: Should Animal Testing Be Allowed? — Argumentative Essay." November 6, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/animal-testing-argumentative-essay/.

• To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
• As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
• As a template for you assignment

Home — Essay Samples — Environment — Animal Welfare — Argumentative Essay The Ethics Of Animal Testing

Argumentative Essay The Ethics of Animal Testing

• Categories: Animal Welfare Ethics

About this sample

Words: 1061 |

Updated: 6 November, 2024

Words: 1061 | Pages: 2 | 6 min read

Table of contents

Understanding the history: a long road of animal testing, the backstory: exploitation through time, today’s talk: a shift towards caring more, the ethical angle: utilitarianism meets animal rights, the bottom line: rethinking our approach.

• Smith, J., & Doe, A. (2021). Animal Research Ethics: Understanding Perspectives . New York: Science Press.
• Miller, K.L., & Thompson, R.H. (2019). " Ethical Considerations in Animal Testing." Journal of Bioethics Studies.
• Jones, L.P., & Greenway S.T.(2020). The Case Against Animal Experimentation . London: Ethics Today Publications.
• Carter B., "Animal Rights vs Utilitarian Viewpoints," Bioethics Online Journal 2021.

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Verified writer

• Expert in: Environment Philosophy

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

4 pages / 1834 words

3 pages / 1670 words

6 pages / 2668 words

1 pages / 540 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Animal Welfare

Lolita, a female orca, has been living in captivity at the Miami Seaquarium for over five decades, captivating audiences with her performances and interactions. Yet, behind the spectacle lies a story of captivity and ethical [...]

For centuries, zoos have been a popular way for people to observe and learn about exotic animals from all over the world. However, the debate over the ethics and morality of keeping animals in captivity has been a contentious [...]

Dogs have been cherished companions to humans for centuries, providing unconditional love, loyalty, and companionship. In today's world, the bond between humans and dogs has only grown stronger, with dogs playing various roles [...]

While some argue that zoos play a crucial role in conservation and education, others believe that they are inherently cruel and should be banned. In this essay, I will argue that zoos should be banned due to their negative [...]

Today’s society is a complex system where no individual is the same due to the differences in ideals on various aspects in life. Wildlife must unfortunately put up with humans and their inability to realize that their lives are [...]

The majestic tiger, once revered and admired, now finds itself on the brink of extinction, facing numerous threats to its survival. As one of the most iconic and endangered animals in the world, the tiger's plight serves as a [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

• IELTS Scores
• Life Skills Test
• Find a Test Centre
• Alternatives to IELTS
• All Lessons
• General Training
• IELTS Tests
• Academic Word List
• Topic Vocabulary
• Collocation
• Phrasal Verbs
• Writing eBooks
• Reading eBook
• All eBooks & Courses
• Sample Essays

Animal Testing Essay

Ielts animal testing essay.

Here you will find an example of an IELTS  animal testing essay .

In this essay, you are asked to discuss the arguments  for  and  against  animal testing, and then give  your own conclusions  on the issue.

This means you must look at both sides of the issue and you must also be sure you give your opinion too.

The essay is similar to an essay that says " Discuss both opinions and then give your opinion " but it is worded differently.

Take a look at the question and model answer below, and think about how the essay has been organised and how it achieves coherence and cohesion.

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write about the following topic:

Examine the arguments in favour of and against animal experiments, and come to a conclusion on this issue.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.

Write at least 250 words.

Animals Testing Essay - Model Answer

Issues related to animal experimentation are frequently discussed these days, particularly in the media. It is often said that animals should not be used in testing because it is cruel and unnecessary. This essay will examine the arguments for and against animal testing. 

On the one hand, the people who support these experiments say that we must do tests on animals. For instance, many famous lifesaving drugs were invented in this way, and animal experiments may help us to find more cures in the future. Indeed, possibly even a cure for cancer and AIDS. Furthermore, the animals which are used are not usually wild but are bred especially for experiments. Therefore, they believe it is not true that animal experiments are responsible for reducing the number of wild animals on the planet. 

On the other hand, others feel that there are good arguments against this. First and foremost, animal experiments are unkind and cause animals a lot of pain. In addition, they feel that many tests are not really important, and in fact animals are not only used to test new medicines but also new cosmetics, which could be tested on humans instead. Another issue is that sometimes an experiment on animals gives us the wrong result because animals’ bodies are not exactly the same as our own. As a consequence, this testing may not be providing the safety that its proponents claim.

In conclusion, I am of the opinion, on balance, that the benefits do not outweigh the disadvantages, and testing on animals should not continue. Although it may improve the lives of humans, it is not fair that animals should suffer in order to achieve this.

(Words 278)

This animal testing essay would achieve a high score.

It fully answers all parts of the task - explaining the arguments ' for ' in the first paragraph and the arguments ' against ' in the next. Conclusions are then drawn with the writer giving their opinion in the conclusion.

It is thus very clearly organised, with each body paragraph having a central idea .

Ideas are also extended and supported by the use of reasons and some examples or further clarification. No ideas are left unclear or unexplained.

There is also some good topic related vocabulary in the animal testing essay such as 'life saving drugs ' and 'bred ' and a mix of complex sentences , such as adverbial clauses :

'Although it may improve the lives of humans, it is not fair that animals should suffer in order to achieve this'.

Noun clauses :

'...they feel that many tests are not really important'.

And relative clauses :

'...the animals which are used are not usually wild... '

Transitions are also used effectively to ensure there is good coherence and cohesion . For example, ' On the other hand.. ' indicates a change to discuss the contrasting ideas, and ' Therefore... " and ' As a consequence..' are used to give results.

<<< Back

Next >>>

More 'Hybrid' Type IELTS Essays:

IELTS Essay: What influence do children’s friends have on them?

In this influence of children's friends essay for IELTS you have to discuss the way children's friends may affect their behaviour and what parents can do to control this.

Communication Technology Essay: How have relationships changed?

Communication Technology Essay for IELTS: This essay is about how relationships have been impacted. View a model answer with tips on how to answer the Task 2 Question.

Fear of Crime Essay: Can more be done to prevent crime?

In this fear of crime essay question for IELTS you have to discuss whether more can be down to prevent crime. It's an opinion type essay.

Old Buildings Essay: How important is it to maintain & protect them?

This essay is about old buildings and whether they should be protected. It's an opinion essay, as you have to give your opinion on protecting old buildings.

Any comments or questions about this page or about IELTS? Post them here. Your email will not be published or shared.

Band 7+ eBooks

"I think these eBooks are FANTASTIC!!! I know that's not academic language, but it's the truth!"

Linda, from Italy, Scored Band 7.5

Bargain eBook Deal! 30% Discount

All 4 Writing eBooks for just  $25.86 Find out more >>

IELTS Modules:

Other resources:.

• Band Score Calculator
• Writing Feedback
• Speaking Feedback
• Teacher Resources
• Free Downloads
• Recent Essay Exam Questions
• Books for IELTS Prep
• Useful Links

Recent Articles

Online IELTS Listening Test Section 4

Nov 14, 24 02:35 AM

IELTS Podcasts

Nov 10, 24 04:25 PM

Improve Coherence and Cohesion in IELTS Writing

Oct 27, 24 07:24 AM

Important pages

IELTS Writing IELTS Speaking IELTS Listening   IELTS Reading All Lessons Vocabulary Academic Task 1 Academic Task 2 Practice Tests

Connect with us

Podcast 

Before you go...

30% discount - just $25.86 for all 4 writing ebooks.

Copyright © 2022- IELTSbuddy All Rights Reserved

IELTS is a registered trademark of University of Cambridge, the British Council, and IDP Education Australia. This site and its owners are not affiliated, approved or endorsed by the University of Cambridge ESOL, the British Council, and IDP Education Australia.

IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample Essays: Should Animal Testing Be Banned for All Purposes? (Band 6-9)

Animal testing has been a contentious topic in IELTS Writing Task 2 for years, with questions about its ethical implications and scientific necessity frequently appearing in exams. The keyword “should animal testing be banned for …

Written by: IELTS Mentor

Published on: October 7, 2024

Animal testing has been a contentious topic in IELTS Writing Task 2 for years, with questions about its ethical implications and scientific necessity frequently appearing in exams. The keyword “should animal testing be banned for all purposes” reflects a common theme that test-takers may encounter. Based on past exam trends and current global debates, it’s highly likely that similar questions will continue to appear in future IELTS tests. Let’s examine a relevant question that has appeared in recent exams:

Some people believe that animal testing should be banned for all purposes, including medical research. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?

Analyzing the Question

This question requires candidates to express their opinion on a controversial topic. It specifically mentions “all purposes, including medical research,” which broadens the scope beyond cosmetic or commercial testing. The phrase “to what extent” allows for a nuanced response, where candidates can partially agree or disagree while discussing various aspects of the issue.

Sample Essay 1 (Band 8-9)

Animal testing has long been a subject of heated debate, with proponents arguing for its necessity in medical advancements and opponents decrying its cruelty. While I acknowledge the historical contributions of animal research to medical progress, I largely agree that it should be banned for all purposes due to ethical concerns and the availability of alternative methods.

Firstly, the ethical implications of subjecting sentient beings to often painful and distressing experiments are profound. Animals, like humans, are capable of experiencing pain and suffering, yet they cannot give consent to participate in these studies. This raises serious moral questions about our right to inflict harm on other species for our potential benefit. Moreover, the stress and confinement associated with laboratory conditions can significantly impact the well-being of test animals, leading to results that may not accurately reflect human responses.

Secondly, advancements in technology have provided increasingly sophisticated alternatives to animal testing. Computer models, human cell and tissue cultures, and organ-on-a-chip technologies can now simulate human biological processes with remarkable accuracy. These methods not only eliminate the need for animal subjects but often provide more reliable and human-relevant results. For instance, human cell cultures can more accurately predict drug toxicity in humans than animal models, potentially leading to safer and more effective treatments.

However, it is important to acknowledge that completely banning animal testing might slow down certain areas of medical research, particularly in the study of complex physiological systems. Nevertheless, I believe that redirecting resources towards developing and refining alternative methods would ultimately lead to more ethical and effective research practices. This transition may require time and investment, but it aligns with our evolving understanding of animal welfare and scientific capabilities.

In conclusion, while animal testing has played a significant role in past medical breakthroughs, the ethical costs and the availability of advanced alternatives make a strong case for its prohibition. By focusing on developing more humane and often more accurate research methods, we can continue to make medical progress without compromising our moral values or the welfare of animals.

(Word count: 309)

Advanced alternatives to animal testing in a research lab

Sample Essay 2 (Band 6-7)

The use of animals in scientific experiments has been a controversial topic for many years. While some people believe that animal testing should be completely banned, including for medical research, I partially disagree with this view. I think that animal testing should be strictly regulated and reduced, but not entirely banned for all purposes.

One reason why animal testing should not be completely banned is its importance in medical research. Many life-saving treatments and medicines have been developed through animal testing. For example, insulin for diabetes and vaccines for various diseases were first tested on animals before being used on humans. Without animal testing, these important medical advances might not have been possible, and many lives could have been lost.

However, I agree that animal testing should be reduced and strictly controlled. There are now many alternative methods available, such as computer simulations and human cell cultures, which can be used instead of animals in some cases. These methods are often cheaper, faster, and do not involve harming animals. Companies and researchers should be encouraged to use these alternatives whenever possible.

Additionally, when animal testing is necessary, it should be done with strict ethical guidelines. Animals should be treated humanely and protected from unnecessary suffering. The number of animals used should be kept to a minimum, and experiments should be carefully designed to get the most information from the fewest animals possible.

In conclusion, while I believe that animal testing should not be completely banned for all purposes, especially in medical research, I think it should be significantly reduced and strictly regulated. By using alternative methods when possible and ensuring ethical treatment of animals when testing is necessary, we can balance scientific progress with animal welfare.

(Word count: 276)

Sample Essay 3 (Band 5-6)

Animal testing is a big problem that many people talk about. Some people think it should be stopped for everything, even medical research. I think this is a difficult question and there are good points on both sides.

On one hand, animal testing can be very cruel. Animals feel pain and fear, just like humans do. Many experiments hurt animals and this is not fair. Also, animals in labs live in small cages and this is not a good life for them. It’s important to be kind to animals and not make them suffer.

But on the other hand, animal testing has helped make many important medicines. Without testing on animals, we might not have cures for some diseases. This has saved many human lives. Doctors and scientists say that sometimes they need to test on animals to make sure new medicines are safe for people.

I think maybe we should try to find other ways to do research that don’t use animals. Scientists are making new methods like using computers or testing on human cells in labs. These new ways might be better than using animals and could give good results too.

In my opinion, we should try to use less animal testing and be very careful when we do use it. We should make rules to protect animals in labs and make sure they don’t suffer too much. But for now, I don’t think we can stop all animal testing, especially for important medical research.

In conclusion, animal testing is a hard issue. We should try to use it less and find better ways to do research, but we might still need it sometimes for very important medical reasons.

(Word count: 263)

Explanation of Band Scores

Band 8-9 essay:.

This essay demonstrates a sophisticated approach to the topic, showcasing:

• Clear position with nuanced arguments
• Logical structure and coherent paragraphs
• Wide range of vocabulary used accurately (e.g., “sentient beings,” “ethical implications,” “physiological systems”)
• Varied sentence structures and complex ideas
• Relevant examples and well-developed points

Band 6-7 Essay:

This essay shows a competent handling of the task with:

• Clear overall position
• Logical organization of ideas
• Adequate range of vocabulary with some precision
• Mix of simple and complex sentence structures
• Relevant main ideas, though less fully developed than the Band 8-9 essay

Band 5-6 Essay:

This essay demonstrates a modest attempt at addressing the task:

• Basic position expressed
• Some organization of ideas, though less clear
• Limited range of vocabulary, mostly simple terms
• Mainly simple sentences with some errors
• Basic ideas presented, but lack of depth in development

Key Vocabulary to Remember

• Contentious (adjective) /kənˈtenʃəs/ – causing or likely to cause disagreement
• Ethical implications (noun phrase) /ˈeθɪkəl ˌɪmpləˈkeɪʃənz/ – moral consequences or considerations
• Sentient (adjective) /ˈsenʃənt/ – able to perceive or feel things
• Physiological (adjective) /ˌfɪziəˈlɒdʒɪkəl/ – relating to the way in which a living organism functions
• Alternative methods (noun phrase) /ɔːlˈtɜːnətɪv ˈmeθədz/ – different approaches or techniques
• Humane (adjective) /hjuːˈmeɪn/ – showing compassion or benevolence
• Organ-on-a-chip (noun) /ˈɔːɡən ɒn ə tʃɪp/ – a multi-channel 3-D microfluidic cell culture chip that simulates the activities of entire organs
• Toxicity (noun) /tɒkˈsɪsəti/ – the degree to which a substance can damage an organism
• Sophisticated (adjective) /səˈfɪstɪkeɪtɪd/ – developed to a high degree of complexity
• Redirect resources (verb phrase) /ˌriːdaɪˈrekt rɪˈsɔːsɪz/ – to change the focus or allocation of funds or efforts

In conclusion, the topic of animal testing remains a significant and challenging issue in IELTS Writing Task 2. As we’ve seen from the sample essays, there are various approaches to addressing this question, depending on the candidate’s language proficiency and analytical skills. For future practice, consider exploring related topics such as:

• The use of animals in cosmetic testing
• Alternatives to animal testing in pharmaceutical research
• The ethics of using animals in scientific experiments for non-medical purposes

To further improve your writing skills, try crafting your own essay on this topic and share it in the comments section below. This active practice will help you refine your arguments, improve your vocabulary, and gain confidence in tackling complex IELTS Writing Task 2 questions.

Should animal cloning for medical purposes be allowed is another related topic that often appears in IELTS exams, presenting similar ethical dilemmas and scientific considerations. As you prepare for your IELTS test, it’s beneficial to explore these interconnected themes to broaden your understanding and argumentation skills.

Ethical debate on animal testing

Remember, while preparing for IELTS Writing Task 2, it’s crucial to practice expressing your ideas clearly and coherently, supporting your arguments with relevant examples, and demonstrating a range of vocabulary and grammatical structures. Should animal testing be banned for cosmetic purposes is another aspect of this debate that you might encounter, which can help you develop a more nuanced understanding of the topic.

As you continue to refine your writing skills, consider how different perspectives on animal testing might apply to various industries and research fields. This broader understanding will enable you to tackle a wide range of potential questions on this topic, enhancing your ability to provide well-rounded and thoughtful responses in your IELTS Writing Task 2.

Showcase of alternative testing methods

Lastly, it’s worth noting that should the use of animals in scientific research be banned is a closely related topic that you might encounter. By exploring these interconnected themes, you’ll be well-prepared to tackle a variety of questions on animal testing and scientific ethics in your IELTS exam.

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

Mastering IELTS Writing Task 2: Sample Essays on Smart Home Technology’s Impact on Safety

Mastering ielts writing task 2: sample essays on art therapy’s role in mental health treatment.

How to Write an Animal Testing Essay: Tips for Argumentative & Persuasive Papers

• 🦮 Things to Know About Animal Rights Essay

📜 Animal Testing Argumentative Essay

🗣️ animal testing persuasive essay.

• ⚖️ Animal Testing For & Against Arguments
• 🦥 Animal testing Essay Sample
• 🐾 15 Awesome Titles for Animal Testing Essay

🦮 Animal Rights Essay Writing Guide

Here’s an introduction to animal testing essay writing. This topic is full of controversies and nuances that you need to know.

1. Animal Testing Essay Challenges

It might seem complicated to stay professional while writing about a sensitive topic. What should you consider before you start to write an animal testing essay?

Be ready to:

• Provide trustworthy facts and numbers. As this topic is debatable, you need to choose scientific data sources. All the evidence that supports your thesis should be credible and accurate.
• Keep your writing ethical. Avoid using biased information, overly emotional language, and stereotypes. Instead, use inclusive language without ambiguous interpretations.
• Regard an opposite opinion. It is essential to understand the issue from different perspectives. Include an opposing point of view to show your competence and the depth of your research.
• Overcome a moral dilemma. There is a lot to debate about animal testing, and you might not find a perfect solution. Therefore, be prepared to find the middle ground.
• Keep up with the scientific progress. As so much research constantly updates, you need to be aware of the last changes. It will help you to include only relevant data in your paper.

2. Animal Testing Essay Tips

Here are some tips to make your writing experience easier:

• Use academic research databases to look for evidence.
• Study the background and the development of the issue.
• Don’t hesitate to verify your data using other publications.
• Be objective when providing your arguments and evidence.
• Create an outline before writing your first draft.
• Create several versions of your essay to select the best one.
• Read papers that cover the same topic.
• Study the opposite point of view.
• Spend some extra time on proofreading and editing.

3. Animal Testing Essay Strategies: Argumentative Vs. Persuasive

Argumentative and persuasive essays on animal testing might seem somewhat similar. Here, we will describe the differences between these two types.

Argumentative Essay

An argumentative essay’s primary purpose is to convince the audience that your position is valid and worth attention.

• It requires profound research. You need to study the terminology and updates while exploring the issue.
• Its main bases are logic and evidence. Avoid emotional appeals even if they make your arguments sound stronger.
• It implies research of both sides. You will need to include an opposing argument and show its relevance.

Persuasive Essay

A persuasive essay convinces its audience using both facts and emotional response of the readers to prove one’s opinion.

• It is less formal. The tone is more relaxed. Choose facts that instantly appeal to your audience.
• Its primary basis is opinion. You will rely on the choice of words and strong arguments rather than on evidence.
• It focuses on one perspective. You have to convince readers that your way of thinking is the only option. Reviewing other positions is optional.

Now that you know the differences, we will look at each type. Here, we will explain how to prepare for writing and create an animal-testing argumentative essay outline.

What Is Animal Testing Argumentative Essay About?

An animal testing argumentative essay discusses the pros and cons of animal testing giving preference to one of the sides. You should state whether animal testing is necessary in your thesis and provide at least two arguments to support your claim. Then you will need to include at least one counterargument to show another perspective.

Animal Testing Argumentative Essay Outline

There are several types of organization for an argumentative essay: classical, Rogerian, and Toulmin. Rogerian is the most suitable one for this topic. This type of organization requires drawing attention to different opinions while promoting your arguments.

• Animal testing essay introduction. Hook your readers. You can use a provocative question, quote, or surprising fact. Introduce your thesis in the last sentence of the paragraph.
• Animal testing essay body. Present the arguments and counterarguments mentioned in your thesis. Support each of them with clear scientific evidence.
• Animal testing essay conclusion. When writing a conclusion , describe what you have covered in your essay. Explain why your arguments won the battle.

3 Tips for Animal Testing Argumentative Essay

Follow these tips to make your essay better:

• Choose an arguable topic. Something that is not obvious. It should puzzle your readers and make them interested in what you say.
• Stick to your thesis. It is the basis of your paper. You need to support every word of your thesis in body paragraphs.
• Think about your audience. Knowing who your readers are will help you choose the writing tone. It also determines the need for more or fewer explanations and background information.

Here is another pattern for developing your animal rights essay . Read the paragraph below to figure out how to write an excellent animal testing persuasive essay.

What Is Animal Testing Persuasive Essay About?

An animal testing persuasive essay is focused on one side of the issue. Here, you choose if you are for or against animal testing and prove your opinion. Appealing to conscience, sense of intelligence, or your readers’ emotions is your best instrument. You need to sound convincing to make your audience accept your perspective.

Animal Testing Persuasive Essay Outline

In this case, you need to focus on solid arguments supporting your viewpoint. It will determine the way your audience reacts to your writing.

• Animal testing essay introduction. Make your position clear by presenting the main ideas your paper covers. Include the central argument in your thesis statement .
• Animal testing essay body. Develop your arguments. Each paragraph is a different idea. Choose facts that would be the most appealing to your audience as evidence.
• Animal testing essay conclusion. Summarize what you have written and explain why your ideas are the only acceptable option. Share your insights and call the audience to action if necessary.

3 Tips for Animal Testing Persuasive Essay

What do you need to do to write a better persuasive essay?

• Show your empathy. It will affect your readers’ experiences and create an emotional bond between you.
• Repeat yourself. Work with paraphrasing and figures of speech. Strategic repetition is an effective tool to remind your readers about the message you are trying to convey.
• Use rhetorical questions. Puzzle your audience by asking them something controversial. At the same time, your argumentation should promote your position as an answer.

⚖️ Animal Testing Essay: For & Against

Here, you will find the pros and cons of animal testing . You can use these arguments in argumentative and persuasive essays.

I. Arguments FOR Animal Testing

Here is why animal testing should be allowed:

• Many life-saving medicines rely on animal testing . According to the California Biomedical Association, animal research helped almost every medical breakthrough in the last century . Millions of human lives depend on animal testing. It helps treat breast cancer, tuberculosis, leukemia, and many others.
• There is no alternative to testing vaccines . Scientists needed animal testing to ensure that a vaccine doesn’t make a virus more dangerous. During the global pandemic of 2020, researchers used genetically modified mice to develop vaccines. There was no other way to ensure people’s safety.
• Animal testing prevents risking lives of human volunteers . If we test medicine or cosmetical products on toxicity, we can’t use people. Human trials also possess risks of side effects, but it could be worse without animal testing.
• It ensures the safety of the products we use . China does not even allow to put cosmetical products on the market before animal testing. We use more and more cosmetical products every day. There are more and more of them on the market. That is why we need to ensure that every product we use is safe for us.
• We need animal testing to make drugs for animals as well . Scientists use animal testing to develop medicines, vaccines, and medical devices.

II. Arguments AGAINST Animal Testing

The reasons why animal testing should be stopped:

• Not all of the testing results apply to people . Many anatomic, cellular, and metabolic differences make animals poor models for us. So some drugs that pass animal testing can eventually fail on people.
• There are alternative testing methods . Skin-producing technologies such as tissue bioprinting and human skin cells growth can replace animal testing. Of course, it is not possible for all the products, but these technologies can significantly reduce the use of animals.
• It does not guarantee 100% safety . Human bodies might react differently to the same ingredients. When drugs do not show any side effects or harmful consequences on animals, they still might be dangerous for humans.
• The demand for cruelty-free products increases . People know about the inhumanity of animal testing and choose to buy cruelty-free products. Politicians are also concerned and take measures against animal testing. European Union, Australia, and South Korea banned cosmetics tested on animals. That is why cosmetical brands give up animal testing and switch to other options.
• Inhumane treatment and bad conditions . Animals suffer from food and water deprivation, inflicted burns and other wounds, and CO2 asphyxiation. Also, many of them have their eyes open for hours to test cosmetic products. Animals deserve ethical treatment as they cannot protect themselves from humans.

🦥 Animal Testing Essay Sample

Read an animal testing argumentative essay example below. You can use it as a reference to your writing.

Should Animal Testing Be Banned Essay

As technological progress moves on, we need to move on too. Some practices that were considered normal should be reviewed in the 21st century. We need to choose animal welfare and moral standards over inhumanity. Animal testing should be banned because it is cruel, expensive, and inefficient.

Animals suffer when scientists use them as test models. Some live in small cages and do not have enough space for motion. Others are forced to eat or drink something unnatural for them. It is common for animals to experience pain because of skin and eye burns, itching, or other side effects in the worst cases. For example, during the Draize test, researchers put chemicals into rabbits' eyes to see the reaction.

Keeping and breeding animals need money. It implies costs for space, food, and other maintenance expenses. As animal tests are not always reliable and need several attempts, the price for developing a successful drug can exceed one billion dollars. Every time you buy a pill or a cosmetic product tested on animals, you pay for animal testing.

Animal testing does not guarantee identical results for humans in most cases. The failure rate for animal testing is higher than 95%. There are also many controversies because the reactions of animals and people to certain ingredients can be opposite. For example, penicillin can kill guinea pigs but helps people. Aspirin is dangerous for pets but relieves human headaches.

To put it all together, animal testing is immoral in the 21st century. It is inhuman, not accurate, and pricey to the companies. It would be better if they invested the money in new technologies to replace animal experimentation. All in all, we pay for these products as customers. We have a right to choose whether or not we want them to be tested on animals.

🐾 Titles for Animal Testing Essay

Last but not least. Below we’ve collected some of our best animal testing essay examples. Use them for inspiration, or try our free research title generator .

• Animal Experiments: Benefits, Ethics, and Defenders.
• Animal Experimentation: Justification Arguments.
• Animal Testing Ban: Counterargument and Rebuttal.
• Genetically Modified Animals and Implications.
• Animal Research, Its Ineffectiveness, and Amorality.
• Equal Consideration of Interests to Animals.
• The Ethics of Animal Use in Scientific Research.
• Debates of Using Animals in Scientific Analysis.
• Animal Testing in Scientific Experiments.
• Cosmetic and Medical Animal Testing.
• Pavlov’s Dog Experiment.
• Qualities That Humans and Animals Share .
• Effects of Animal Companions in Psychotherapy .
• Human and Animal Experiments in Psychology Studies: Implications for Society .
• Animal Studies: The Role in Behaviorism Development .

🔗 References

• Suggestions for Developing Argumentative Essays
• 8 Persuasive Writing Tips and Techniques
• Animal Testing – Pros & Cons – ProCon.org
• The Debate on Animal Experimentation – Sather Health
• Importance of Animals in Human Lives | Sciencing
• Are There Any Benefits to Animal Testing? Get the Facts | PETA

Research Paper Analysis: How to Analyze a Research Article + Example

Film analysis: example, format, and outline + topics & prompts.