Skinner Box: What Is an Operant Conditioning Chamber?
Charlotte Nickerson
Research Assistant at Harvard University
Undergraduate at Harvard University
Charlotte Nickerson is a student at Harvard University obsessed with the intersection of mental health, productivity, and design.
Learn about our Editorial Process
Saul McLeod, PhD
Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology
BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester
Saul McLeod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.
Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc
Associate Editor for Simply Psychology
BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education
Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.
On This Page:
The Skinner box is a chamber that isolates the subject from the external environment and has a behavior indicator such as a lever or a button.
When the animal pushes the button or lever, the box is able to deliver a positive reinforcement of the behavior (such as food) or a punishment (such as noise), or a token conditioner (such as a light) that is correlated with either the positive reinforcement or punishment.
- The Skinner box, otherwise known as an operant conditioning chamber, is a laboratory apparatus used to study animal behavior within a compressed time frame.
- Underlying the development of the Skinner box was the concept of operant conditioning, a type of learning that occurs as a consequence of a behavior.
- The Skinner Box has been wrongly confused with the Skinner air crib, with detrimental public consequences for Skinner.
- Commentators have drawn parallels between the Skinner box and modern advertising and game design, citing their addictive qualities and systematized rewards.
How Does It Work?
The Skinner Box is a chamber, often small, that is used to conduct operant conditioning research with animals. Within this chamber, there is usually a lever or key that an individual animal can operate to obtain a food or water source within the chamber as a reinforcer.
The chamber is connected to electronic equipment that records the animal’s lever pressing or key pecking, allowing for the precise quantification of behavior.
Before the works of Skinner, the namesake of the Skinner box, instrumental learning was typically studied using a maze or puzzle box.
Learning in these settings is well-suited to examining discrete trials or episodes of behavior instead of a continuous stream of behavior.
The Skinner box, meanwhile, was designed as an experimental environment better suited to examine the more natural flow of behavior in animals.
The design of the Skinner Box varies heavily depending on the type of animal enclosed within it and experimental variables.
Nonetheless, it includes, at minimum, at least one lever, bar, or key that an animal can manipulate. Besides the reinforcer and tracker, a skinner box can include other variables, such as lights, sounds, or images. In some cases, the floor of the chamber may even be electrified (Boulay, 2019).
The design of the Skinner box is intended to keep an animal from experiencing other stimuli, allowing researchers to carefully study behavior in a very controlled environment.
This allows researchers to, for example, determine which schedule of reinforcement — or relation of rewards and punishment to the reinforcer — leads to the highest rate of response in the animal being studied (Boulay, 2019).
The Reinforcer
The reinforcer is the part of the Skinner box that provides, naturally, reinforcement for an action. For instance, a lever may provide a pellet of food when pressed a certain number of times. This lever is the reinforcer (Boulay, 2019).
The Tracker/Quantifier
The tracker, meanwhile, provides quantitative data regarding the reinforcer. For example, the tracker may count the number of times that a lever is pressed or the number of electric shocks or pellets dispensed (Boulay, 2019).
Partial Reinforcement Schedules
Partial reinforcement occurs when reinforcement is only given under particular circumstances. For example, a pellet or shock may only be dispensed after a pigeon has pressed a lever a certain number of times.
There are several types of partial reinforcement schedules (Boulay, 2019):
- Fixed-ratio schedules , where an animal receives a pellet after pushing the trigger a certain number of times.
- Variable-ratio schedules , where animals receive reinforcement after a random number of responses.
- Fixed-interval schedules , where animals are given a pellet after a designated period of time has elapsed, such as every 5 minutes.
- Variable-interval schedules , where animals receive a reinforcer at random.
Once data has been obtained from the Skinner box, researchers can look at the rate of response depending on the schedule.
The Skinner Box in Research
Modified versions of the operant conditioning chamber, or Skinner box, are still widely used in research settings today.
Skinner developed his theory of operant conditioning by identifying four different types of punishment or reward.
To test the effect of these outcomes, he constructed a device called the “Skinner Box,” a cage in which a rat could be placed, with a small lever (which the rat would be trained to press), a chute that would release pellets of food, and a floor which could be electrified.
For example, a hungry rat was placed in a cage. Every time he activated the lever, a food pellet fell into the food dispenser (positive reinforcement). The rats quickly learned to go straight to the lever after a few times of being put in the box.
This suggests that positive reinforcement increases the likelihood of the behavior being repeated.
In another experiment, a rat was placed in a cage in which they were subjected to an uncomfortable electrical current (see diagram above).
As they moved around the cage, the rat hit the lever, which immediately switched off the electrical current (negative reinforcement). The rats quickly learned to go straight to the lever after a few times of being put in the box.
This suggests that negative reinforcement increases the likelihood of the behavior being repeated.
The device allowed Skinner to deliver each of his four potential outcomes, which are:
- Positive Reinforcement : a direct reward for performing a certain behavior. For instance, the rat could be rewarded with a pellet of food for pushing the lever.
- Positive Punishment : a direct negative outcome following a particular behavior. Once the rat had been taught to press the lever, for instance, Skinner trained it to cease this behavior by electrifying the floor each time the lever was pressed.
- Negative Reinforcement : the removal of an unpleasant situation when a particular behavior is performed (thus producing a sense of relief). For instance, a mild electric current was passed through the floor of the cage and was removed when a desired behavior was formed.
- Negative Punishment : involves taking away a reward or removing a pleasant situation. In the Skinner box, for instance, the rat could be trained to stop pressing the lever by releasing food pellets at regular intervals and then withholding them when the lever was pressed.
Commercial Applications
The application of operant and classical conditioning and the corresponding idea of the Skinner Box in commercial settings is widespread, particularly with regard to advertising and video games.
Advertisers use a number of techniques based on operant conditioning to influence consumer behavior, such as variable-ratio reinforcement schedule (the so-called “slot machine effect”), which encourages viewers to keep watching a particular channel in the hope of seeing a desirable outcome (e.g., winning a prize) (Vu, 2017).
Similarly, video game designers often employ Skinnerian principles in order to keep players engaged in gameplay.
For instance, many games make use of variable-ratio schedules of reinforcement, whereby players are given rewards (e.g., points, new levels) at random intervals.
This encourages players to keep playing in the hope of receiving a reward. In addition, many games make use of Skinner’s principle of shaping, whereby players are gradually given more difficult tasks as they master the easy ones. This encourages players to persevere in the face of frustration in order to see results.
There are a number of potential problems with using operant conditioning principles in commercial settings.
First, advertisers and video game designers may inadvertently create addictive behaviors in consumers.
Second, operant conditioning is a relatively short-term phenomenon; that is, it only affects behavior while reinforcement is being given.
Once reinforcement is removed (e.g., the TV channel is changed, the game is turned off), the desired behavior is likely to disappear as well.
As such, operant conditioning techniques may backfire, leading to addiction without driving the game-playing experiences developers hoped for (Vu, 2017).
Skinner Box Myths
In 1945, B. F. Skinner invented the air crib, a metal crib with walls and a ceiling made of removable safety glass.
The front pane of the crib was also made of safety glass, and the entire structure was meant to sit on legs so that it could be moved around easily.
The air crib was designed to create a climate-controlled, healthier environment for infants. The air crib was not commercially successful, but it did receive some attention from the media.
In particular, Time magazine ran a story about the air crib in 1947, which described it as a “baby tender” that would “give infant care a new scientific basis.” (Joyce & Fay, 2010).
The general lack of publicity around Skinner’s air crib, however, resulted in the perpetuation of the myth that Skinner’s air crib was a Skinner Box and that the infants placed in the crib were being conditioned.
In reality, the air crib was nothing more than a simple bassinet with some features that were meant to make it easier for parents to care for their infants.
There is no evidence that Skinner ever used the air crib to condition children, and in fact, he later said that it was never his intention to do so.
One famous myth surrounding the Skinner Crib was that Skinner’s daughter, Deborah Skinner, was Raised in a Skinner Box.
According to this rumor, Deborah Skinner had become mentally ill, sued her father, and committed suicide as a result of her experience. These rumors persisted until she publicly denied the stories in 2004 (Joyce & Fay, 2010).
Effectiveness
One of the most common criticisms of the Skinner box is that it does not allow animals to understand their actions.
Because behaviorism does not require that an animal understand its actions, this theory can be somewhat misleading about the degree to which an animal actually understands what it is doing (Boulay, 2019).
Another criticism of the Skinner box is that it can be quite stressful for the animals involved. The design of the Skinner box is intended to keep an animal from experiencing other stimuli, which can lead to stress and anxiety.
Finally, some critics argue that the data obtained from Skinner boxes may not be generalizable to real-world situations.
Because the environment in a Skinner box is so controlled, it may not accurately reflect how an animal would behave in an environment outside the lab.
There are very few learning environments in the real world that replicate a perfect operant conditioning environment, with a single action or sequence of actions leading to a stimulus (Boulay, 2019).
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Dezfouli, A., & Balleine, B. W. (2012). Habits, action sequences and reinforcement learning. European Journal of Neuroscience, 35 (7), 1036-1051.
Du Boulay, B. (2019). Escape from the Skinner Box: The case for contemporary intelligent learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50 (6), 2902-2919.
Chen, C., Zhang, K. Z., Gong, X., & Lee, M. (2019). Dual mechanisms of reinforcement reward and habit in driving smartphone addiction: the role of smartphone features. Internet Research.
Dad, H., Ali, R., Janjua, M. Z. Q., Shahzad, S., & Khan, M. S. (2010). Comparison of the frequency and effectiveness of positive and negative reinforcement practices in schools. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 3 (1), 127-136.
Diedrich, J. L. (2010). Motivating students using positive reinforcement (Doctoral dissertation).
Dozier, C. L., Foley, E. A., Goddard, K. S., & Jess, R. L. (2019). Reinforcement. T he Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Development, 1-10.
Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement . New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Gunter, P. L., & Coutinho, M. J. (1997). Negative reinforcement in classrooms: What we’re beginning to learn. Teacher Education and Special Education, 20 (3), 249-264.
Joyce, N., & Faye, C. (2010). Skinner Air Crib. APS Observer, 23 (7).
Kamery, R. H. (2004, July). Motivation techniques for positive reinforcement: A review. I n Allied Academies International Conference. Academy of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues. Proceedings (Vol. 8, No. 2, p. 91). Jordan Whitney Enterprises, Inc.
Kohler, W. (1924). The mentality of apes. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Staddon, J. E., & Niv, Y. (2008). Operant conditioning. Scholarpedia, 3 (9), 2318.
Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. New York: Appleton-Century.
Skinner, B. F. (1948). Superstition” in the pigeon . Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 168-172.
Skinner, B. F. (1951). How to teach animals. Freeman.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. SimonandSchuster.com.
Skinner, B. F. (1963). Operant behavior. American psychologist, 18 (8), 503.
Smith, S., Ferguson, C. J., & Beaver, K. M. (2018). Learning to blast a way into crime, or just good clean fun? Examining aggressive play with toy weapons and its relation with crime. Criminal behaviour and mental health, 28 (4), 313-323.
Staddon, J. E., & Cerutti, D. T. (2003). Operant conditioning. Annual Review of Psychology, 54 (1), 115-144.
Thorndike, E. L. (1898). Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 2(4), i-109.
Vu, D. (2017). An Analysis of Operant Conditioning and its Relationship with Video Game Addiction.
Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it . Psychological Review, 20, 158–177.
Skinner’s theory on Operant Conditioning
After the retirement of John B. Watson from the world of Academic psychology, psychologists and behaviorists were eager to propose new forms of learning other than the classical conditioning. The most important among these theories was Operant Conditioning proposed by Burrhus Frederic Skinner, commonly known as B.F. Skinner.
Skinner based his theory in the simple fact that the study of observable behavior is much simpler than trying to study internal mental events. Skinner’s works concluded a study far less extreme than those of Watson (1913), and it deemed classical conditioning as too simplistic of a theory to be a complete explanation of complex human behavior.
B.F. Skinner is famous for his pioneering research in the field of learning and behavior. He proposed the theory to study complex human behavior by studying the voluntary responses shown by an organism when placed in the certain environment. He named these behaviors or responses as operant. He is also called the father of Operant Conditioning Learning, but he based his theory known as “Law of Effect”, discovered by Edward Thorndike in 1905.
Operant Conditioning Learning
B.F. Skinner proposed his theory on operant conditioning by conducting various experiments on animals. He used a special box known as “Skinner Box” for his experiment on rats.
As the first step to his experiment, he placed a hungry rat inside the Skinner box. The rat was initially inactive inside the box, but gradually as it began to adapt to the environment of the box, it began to explore around. Eventually, the rat discovered a lever, upon pressing which; food was released inside the box. After it filled its hunger, it started exploring the box again, and after a while it pressed the lever for the second time as it grew hungry again. This phenomenon continued for the third, fourth and the fifth time, and after a while, the hungry rat immediately pressed the lever once it was placed in the box. Then the conditioning was deemed to be complete.
Here, the action of pressing the lever is an operant response/behavior, and the food released inside the chamber is the reward. The experiment is also known as Instrumental Conditioning Learning as the response is instrumental in getting food.
This experiment also deals with and explains the effects of positive reinforcement. Upon pressing the lever, the hungry rat was served with food, which filled its hunger; hence, it’s a positive reinforcement.
B.F. Skinner’s Second Experiment
B.F. Skinner also conducted an experiment that explained negative reinforcement. Skinner placed a rat in a chamber in the similar manner, but instead of keeping it hungry, he subjected the chamber to an unpleasant electric current. The rat having experienced the discomfort started to desperately move around the box and accidentally knocked the lever. Pressing of the lever immediately seized the flow of unpleasant current. After a few times, the rat had smartened enough to go directly to the lever in order to prevent itself from the discomfort.
The electric current reacted as the negative reinforcement, and the consequence of escaping the electric current made sure that the rat repeated the action again and again. Here too, the pressing of the lever is an operant response, and the complete stop of the electric current flow is its reward.
Both the experiment clearly explains the working of operant conditioning. The important part in any operant conditioning learning is to recognize the operant behavior and the consequence resulted in that particular environment.
What are other people reading?
- General Categories
- Mental Health
- IQ and Intelligence
- Bipolar Disorder
Skinner Box Psychology: Exploring the Fundamentals of Operant Conditioning
A tiny cage, a lever, and a curious rat—these unassuming elements form the groundbreaking apparatus that revolutionized our understanding of behavior and learning: the Skinner Box. This seemingly simple device, conceived by the brilliant mind of B.F. Skinner, would go on to reshape the landscape of psychological research and our comprehension of how organisms learn and adapt to their environment.
Imagine, if you will, a world where the intricacies of human and animal behavior were shrouded in mystery, where the mechanisms of learning were more guesswork than science. Enter Burrhus Frederic Skinner, a man whose insatiable curiosity about behavior would lead him to create one of the most influential tools in the history of psychology. The Skinner Box, also known as an operant conditioning chamber, became the cornerstone of behaviorism and continues to influence modern psychological practices today.
But what exactly is this magical box, and why has it captivated the minds of researchers for decades? Let’s dive into the fascinating world of operant conditioning and discover how a small box with a lever changed everything we thought we knew about behavior.
The Skinner Box: A Window into the Mind
Picture a small, enclosed space – not much bigger than a shoebox. Inside, you’ll find a lever or button, a food dispenser, and sometimes a light or speaker. This unassuming setup is the Skinner Box in its most basic form. But don’t let its simplicity fool you; this apparatus is a powerhouse of behavioral research.
The genius of the Skinner Box lies in its ability to isolate and control environmental variables. By placing an animal (typically a rat or pigeon) inside the box, researchers can observe how it interacts with its surroundings and responds to various stimuli. The lever or button serves as the primary means of interaction, while the food dispenser provides reinforcement for desired behaviors.
But the Skinner Box isn’t a one-trick pony. Depending on the experiment, researchers can modify the box to include additional elements like lights, sounds, or even electric grids. These variations allow scientists to study a wide range of behaviors and learning processes, from simple reward-seeking to complex decision-making.
Operant Conditioning: The Heart of Skinner Box Psychology
At the core of Skinner Box experiments lies the principle of operant conditioning. This form of learning occurs when an organism’s behavior is modified by its consequences. Unlike classical conditioning , which focuses on involuntary responses to stimuli, operant conditioning deals with voluntary behaviors and their outcomes.
In the Skinner Box, operant conditioning takes center stage. When a rat presses a lever and receives a food pellet, it’s more likely to repeat that behavior in the future. This is positive reinforcement in action – the addition of a desirable outcome (food) increases the likelihood of the behavior (lever pressing).
But it’s not all about rewards. Negative reinforcement also plays a crucial role in operant conditioning. Imagine a Skinner Box where a mild electric current runs through the floor. The rat learns that pressing the lever turns off the current, thus reinforcing the lever-pressing behavior by removing an unpleasant stimulus.
And let’s not forget about punishment. While less common in modern experiments due to ethical concerns, punishment in the Skinner Box could involve the introduction of an unpleasant stimulus or the removal of a pleasant one to decrease the likelihood of a behavior.
One of the most intriguing aspects of Skinner Box experiments is the use of various reinforcement schedules. These schedules determine when and how often a behavior is reinforced. For example, a fixed ratio schedule might deliver a reward after every fifth lever press, while a variable ratio schedule could provide reinforcement after an unpredictable number of responses. These different schedules can produce fascinating patterns of behavior, mirroring the complexities of real-world learning and motivation.
The Man Behind the Box: B.F. Skinner’s Legacy
To truly appreciate the Skinner Box, we must understand the man who created it. B.F. Skinner wasn’t just a psychologist; he was a visionary who dared to challenge the prevailing theories of his time. Born in 1904 in Pennsylvania, Skinner initially aspired to be a writer. However, his encounter with John B. Watson’s behaviorism sparked a lifelong passion for understanding the mechanics of behavior.
Skinner’s development of the operant conditioning chamber was driven by his dissatisfaction with existing research methods. He believed that to truly understand behavior, one needed to observe it in a controlled environment, free from the complexities and variables of the outside world. The Skinner Box was his answer to this problem.
As Skinner refined his apparatus and conducted numerous experiments, he made groundbreaking discoveries about the nature of learning and behavior. His work demonstrated that complex behaviors could be shaped through a process of successive approximation , reinforcing closer and closer approximations of the desired behavior.
The impact of Skinner’s work on behaviorism and psychological research cannot be overstated. His ideas challenged the dominance of Freudian psychoanalysis and paved the way for a more scientific approach to understanding human behavior. The Skinner Box became a symbol of this new era in psychology, representing a shift towards empirical observation and controlled experimentation.
From Lab to Life: Real-World Applications of Skinner Box Principles
While the Skinner Box itself might seem confined to laboratory settings, its principles have found widespread application in various real-world contexts. Animal trainers, for instance, use operant conditioning techniques to shape the behavior of everything from household pets to zoo animals. The clicker training method, popular among dog trainers, is a direct descendant of Skinner’s work.
In educational settings, the influence of Skinner Box psychology is evident in the use of positive reinforcement and behavior modification techniques. Teachers might use token economies or point systems to encourage desired behaviors and academic performance, mirroring the reinforcement schedules studied in the Skinner Box.
Perhaps most significantly, the principles derived from Skinner Box experiments have played a crucial role in the development of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). This widely used therapeutic approach focuses on identifying and changing maladaptive behaviors and thought patterns, often employing techniques rooted in operant conditioning.
However, it’s important to note that the application of Skinner Box principles hasn’t been without controversy. Critics have raised concerns about the ethical implications of behavior modification techniques, particularly when applied to vulnerable populations or used for manipulative purposes. The use of operant conditioning in advertising and social media design, for example, has sparked debates about the ethics of exploiting psychological principles for commercial gain.
Criticisms and Limitations: The Other Side of the Box
Despite its undeniable impact on psychology, the Skinner Box and the behaviorist approach it represents have faced their fair share of criticism. One of the primary critiques is that this approach oversimplifies complex behaviors, reducing the richness of human experience to a series of stimulus-response connections.
Critics argue that Skinner’s focus on observable behavior neglects the importance of cognitive processes, emotions, and internal mental states. This limitation becomes particularly apparent when trying to explain higher-order human behaviors like language acquisition or problem-solving. While stimulus-organism-response (SOR) theory attempts to address some of these concerns, many psychologists feel that behaviorism alone is insufficient to explain the full spectrum of human behavior.
Ethical concerns have also been raised about the use of animals in Skinner Box experiments. While these studies have undoubtedly contributed valuable insights to our understanding of learning and behavior, the confinement and manipulation of animals for research purposes continue to be a topic of debate in the scientific community.
Furthermore, the direct application of Skinner Box principles to human behavior has its limitations. Human beings, with their complex social structures, cultural influences, and capacity for self-reflection, don’t always behave in ways that can be predicted by simple reinforcement schedules. The work of psychologists like Edward Tolman , who introduced the concept of cognitive maps, highlighted the need for a more nuanced understanding of learning that incorporates internal mental processes.
The Evolution of Skinner’s Legacy
As psychology has evolved, so too has our understanding of the principles first explored in the Skinner Box. Modern researchers have built upon Skinner’s work, integrating insights from cognitive psychology, neuroscience, and other fields to create a more comprehensive picture of behavior and learning.
For instance, the concept of higher-order conditioning has expanded our understanding of how organisms learn to associate stimuli, going beyond the simple associations studied in early Skinner Box experiments. Similarly, research on extinction in psychology has provided valuable insights into how learned behaviors can be eliminated or modified over time.
The principles of operant conditioning have also been applied to understanding more complex phenomena, such as the development of superstitious behaviors or the persistence of gambling addiction. By examining these issues through the lens of reinforcement schedules and behavior shaping, researchers have gained new perspectives on some of humanity’s most puzzling behaviors.
The Enduring Impact of the Skinner Box
As we reflect on the journey from Skinner’s initial experiments to the modern landscape of psychological research and practice, it’s clear that the humble Skinner Box has left an indelible mark on our understanding of behavior and learning.
The core concepts of operant conditioning – reinforcement, punishment, and the shaping of behavior through consequences – continue to inform various fields, from education and therapy to animal training and user experience design. While we’ve moved beyond a purely behaviorist approach, the insights gained from Skinner Box experiments remain foundational to many aspects of psychological theory and practice.
Looking to the future, the legacy of the Skinner Box continues to evolve. Researchers are now using advanced technology to create virtual operant conditioning chambers, allowing for more complex and ethical studies of human behavior. The principles first explored in that small box are being applied to understand and address some of society’s most pressing issues, from addiction treatment to environmental conservation.
In conclusion, the Skinner Box stands as a testament to the power of scientific inquiry and the enduring relevance of behavioral principles in understanding the complexities of learning and adaptation. From its humble beginnings as a tool for studying rat behavior, it has grown into a cornerstone of psychological research and theory, influencing fields far beyond the confines of the laboratory.
As we continue to grapple with questions of human behavior and learning in an increasingly complex world, the lessons learned from the Skinner Box serve as a reminder of the value of systematic observation, controlled experimentation, and the endless curiosity that drives scientific discovery. Whether we’re exploring the intricacies of conditioned response psychology or investigating the nuances of trial and error learning , the spirit of inquiry embodied by Skinner and his revolutionary box continues to inspire and inform psychological research today.
The next time you find yourself pondering the mysteries of behavior – why we do what we do, how we learn, and how we change – remember that tiny cage, that simple lever, and that curious rat. In that unassuming setup lies a world of discovery, a testament to human ingenuity, and a key to unlocking the secrets of the mind. The Skinner Box may be small, but its impact on our understanding of behavior and learning is immeasurable.
References:
1. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
2. Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
3. Staddon, J. E. R., & Cerutti, D. T. (2003). Operant conditioning. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 115-144.
4. Rescorla, R. A. (1988). Pavlovian conditioning: It’s not what you think it is. American Psychologist, 43(3), 151-160.
5. Catania, A. C. (1998). Learning (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6. Domjan, M. (2014). The Principles of Learning and Behavior (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
7. Mazur, J. E. (2016). Learning and Behavior (8th ed.). New York: Routledge.
8. Pierce, W. D., & Cheney, C. D. (2013). Behavior Analysis and Learning (5th ed.). New York: Psychology Press.
9. Baum, W. M. (2017). Understanding behaviorism: Behavior, culture, and evolution (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.
10. Lattal, K. A., & Perone, M. (Eds.). (1998). Handbook of research methods in human operant behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
Was this article helpful?
Would you like to add any comments (optional), leave a reply cancel reply.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Post Comment
Related Resources
Opium’s Effects on the Brain: Neurological Impact and Consequences
TTM Psychology: Exploring Trichotillomania and Its Impact on Mental Health
Psychological Causes of Alcoholism: Unraveling the Complex Web of Addiction
Psychology of a Womanizer: Unraveling the Mindset Behind Serial Seduction
Chemsex Psychology: Exploring the Mental Health Aspects of Drug-Fueled Sexual…
Nail Biting Psychology: Understanding and Overcoming the Habit
Nicotine in Psychology: Exploring Its Definition, Effects, and Implications
Psychological Signs of Addiction: Recognizing the Mental Health Impact of…
Psychological Effects of Ecstasy: Short-Term Bliss and Long-Term Consequences
Psychology of Collecting: Unveiling the Motivations Behind Acquisition and Curation