To be, or not to be from Hamlet

By William Shakespeare

“To be, or not to be,” the opening line of Hamlet’s mindful soliloquy, is one of the most thought-provoking quotes of all time. The monologue features the important theme of existential crisis.

William Shakespeare

His plays and poems are read all over the world.  

Sudip Das Gupta

Poem Analyzed by Sudip Das Gupta

First-class B.A. Honors Degree in English Literature

The “To be, or not to be” quote is taken from the first line of Hamlet’s soliloquy that appears in Act 3, Scene 1 of the eponymous play by William Shakespeare ( Bio | Poems ) , “Hamlet”. The full quote, “To be, or not to be, that is the question” is famous for its open-ended meaning that not only encompasses the thoughts raging inside Hamlet’s mind but also features the theme of existential crisis. Digging deeper into the soliloquy reveals a variety of concepts and meanings that apply to all human beings. For this reason, the quote has become a specimen for understanding how Shakespeare thought.

Log in or join Poetry + to access Poem Printable PDFs.

Poem Printables

Explore To be, or not to be

  • 3 Structure
  • 4 Literary Devices
  • 5 Detailed Analysis
  • 6 Historical Context
  • 7 Notable Usage
  • 9 Similar Quotes

To be, or not to be soliloquy from Hamlet

In Act 3, Scene 1, also known as the “nunnery scene,” of the tragedy , “Hamlet” by William Shakespeare ( Bio | Poems ) , this monologue appears. Hamlet, torn between life and death, utters the words to the audience revealing what is happening inside his mind. It is a soliloquy because Hamlet does not express his thoughts to other characters. Rather he discusses what he thinks in that critical juncture with his inner self.

Before reading this soliloquy, readers have to go through the plots that happened in the play. In the previous plots, Hamlet has lost his father. He is broken to know the fact that his uncle Claudius killed his father treacherously and married his mother, Gertrude. Having a conversation with the ghost of his father, he is torn between perception and reality.

In such a critical situation, Hamlet feels extremely lonely as there are no other persons to console him. Besides, Ophelia is not accepting his love due to the pressure from her family. For all the things happening in his life, he feels it is better to die rather than living and mutely bearing the pangs that life is sending him in a row. Being engrossed with such thoughts, he utters this soliloquy, “To be, or not to be.”

“To be, or not to be” by William Shakespeare ( Bio | Poems ) describes how Hamlet is torn between life and death. His mental struggle to end the pangs of his life gets featured in this soliloquy.

Hamlet’s soliloquy begins with the memorable line, “To be, or not to be, that is the question.” It means that he cannot decide what is better, ending all the sufferings of life by death, or bearing the mental burdens silently. He is in such a critical juncture that it seems death is more rewarding than all the things happening with him for the turn of fortune.

Death is like sleep, he thinks, that ends this fitful fever of life. But, what dreams are stored for him in the pacifying sleep of death. This thought makes him rethink and reconsider. Somehow, it seems to him that before diving deeper into the regions of unknown and unseen, it is better to wait and see. In this way, his subconscious mind makes him restless and he suffers in inaction.

The full quotation is regarded as a soliloquy. Though in the plot , Ophelia is on stage pretending to read, Hamlet expresses his thoughts only to himself. He is unaware of the fact that Ophelia is already there. Being engrossed in his self-same musing, he clarifies his thoughts to himself first as he is going to take a tough decision.

Therefore, this quote is a soliloquy that Shakespeare uses as a dramatic device to let Hamlet make his thoughts known to the audience, addressing them indirectly.

In the earliest version of the play, this monologue is 35 lines long. The last two lines are often excluded from the soliloquy as those lines contain the mental transition of the speaker , from thoughts to reality.

The overall soliloquy is in blank verse as the text does not have a rhyming scheme . Most of Shakespeare’s dramas are written in this form. Besides, it is written in iambic pentameter with a few metrical variations.

For example, let’s have a look at the metrically scanned opening line of the soliloquy:

To be ,/ or not / to be ,/ that is / the quest(io)n :

The last syllable of the line contains an elision .

Literary Devices

The first line of the speech , “To be, or not to be, that is the question” contains two literary devices. These are antithesis and aporia . The following lines also contain aporia.

Readers come across a metaphor in, “The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune.” This line also contains a personification . Another device is embedded in the line. After rereading the line, it can be found that there is a repetition of the “r” sound. It’s an alliteration .

There is another metaphor in the phrase, “sea of troubles.” In the next two lines, Shakespeare uses enjambment and internally connects the lines for maintaining the speech’s flow.

Readers can find a use of synecdoche in the line, “That flesh is heir to.” They can find an anadiplosis in the lines, “To die, to sleep;/ To sleep, perchance to dream.” Besides, a circumlocution or hyperbaton can be found in this line, “When we have shuffled off this mortal coil.”

After this line, the speaker presents a series of causes that lead to his suffering. These lines collectively contain a device called the climax . Using this device, Shakespeare presents the most shocking idea at the very end. He uses a rhetorical question , “With a bare bodkin?” at the end to heighten this dramatic effect.

There is an epigram in the line, “Thus conscience doth make cowards of us all.” The following lines contain this device as well.

Detailed Analysis

To be, or not to be, that is the question:

The first line of Hamlet’s soliloquy, “To be, or nor to be” is one of the best-known quotes from all the Shakespearean works combined. In the play, “Hamlet” the tragic hero expresses this soliloquy to the audience in Act 3, Scene 1. As the plots reflect, Hamlet is facing an existential crisis after coming across the harsh reality of his father’s death and his mother’s subsequent marriage with his uncle, Claudius, the murderer of King Hamlet. Everything was happening so quickly that it was difficult to digest their effect.

The truth, like arrows bolting directly toward his mind, made him so vulnerable that he was just a step behind madness or death. It is not clear whether Hamlet’s deliriously spoke this soliloquy or he was preparing himself to die. Whatsoever, through this dramatic device, Shakespeare projects how Hamlet’s mind is torn between life and death.

The first line of his soliloquy is open-ended. It is a bit difficult to understand what the question is. “To be, or not be” is an intellectual query that a princely mind is asking the readers. This antithetical idea reveals Hamlet is not sure whether he wants to live or die. If readers strictly adhere to the plot, they can decode this line differently. It seems that the hero is asking whether it is right to be a murderer for the right cause or be merciful for saving his soul from damnation.

Firstly, if he chooses to avenge his father’s death, it will eventually kill the goodness in him. Secondly, if he refuses to submit to his animalistic urges, the pain lying deep in his subconscious mind is going to torture his soul. For this reason, he is going through a mental crisis regarding which path to choose. This question is constantly confusing his mind.

Lines 2–5

Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, Or to take arms against a sea of troubles And by opposing end them.

From these lines, it becomes clear what questions are troubling the tragic hero, Hamlet. He is asking just a simple question. Readers should not take this question at its surface value. They have to understand what is going on in his mind. He asks whether a noble mind like him has to suffer the metaphorical “slings and arrows of outrageous fortune.” In this phrase, Shakespeare compares fortune to an archer who releases arrows and hurts Hamlet’s mind.

The speaker talks about the events happening in his life for his misfortune . Those situations not only make his mind bruised but also make him vulnerable to the upcoming arrows. In such a critical mental state, a single blow of fortune can end his life. But, he has not submitted himself to fate yet. He is ready to fight against those troubles and end them all at once.

The phrase, “sea of troubles” contains hyperbole . It also contains a metaphor. The comparison is between the vastness of the sea to the incalculable troubles of the speaker’s life. It is important to mention here that the speaker just wants an answer. He badly wants to end the troubles but he thinks by choosing the safest path of embracing death, he can also finish his mental sufferings.

Lines 5–9

To die—to sleep, No more; and by a sleep to say we end The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks That flesh is heir to: ’tis a consummation Devoutly to be wish’d.

In this section of the soliloquy, “To be, or not to be” Hamlet’s utterings reflect a sense of longing for death. According to him, dying is like sleeping. Through this sleep that will help him to end the mental sufferings, he can get a final relief. The phrase, “No more” emphasizes how much he longs for this eternal sleep.

This path seems more relieving for Hamlet. Why is it so? Hamlet has to undergo a lot of troubles to be free from the shackles of “outrageous fortune.” While if he dies, there is no need to do anything. Just a moment can end, all of his troubles. It seems easier than said. However, for a speaker like Hamlet who has seen much, the cold arm of death is more soothing than the tough punches of fortune.

For this reason, he wants to take a nap in the bosom of death. In this way, the heartache and shocks will come to an end. The speaker refers to two types of pain. One is natural that troubles every human being. While another pain is inflicted by the wrongs of others. The sufferer cannot put an end to such suffering. However, death can end both of these pains.

There are thousands of natural shocks that the human body is destined to suffer. What are these shocks? It includes the death of a loved one, disease, bodily impairment, and many more. In Hamlet’s case, losing his dear father tragically is a natural shock. But, the cause of the death increases the intensity of the shock. The subsequent events, one by one, add more burdens on Hamlet’s mind.

To end this mental tension, Hamlet devoutly wishes for the “consummation” that will not only relieve him but also end the cycle of events. Here, Shakespeare uses the word “consummation” in its metaphorical sense. The final moment when all the sufferings come to an end is death. So, it’s a consummation that is devoutly wished.

Lines 9–14

To die, to sleep; To sleep, perchance to dream—ay, there’s the rub: For in that sleep of death what dreams may come, When we have shuffled off this mortal coil, Must give us pause—there’s the respect That makes calamity of so long life.

Again, Shakespeare uses the repetition of the phrase, “To die, to sleep.” It is the second instance where Hamlet uses these words. If readers closely analyze the lines, it will be clear that Hamlet uses this phrase to mark a transition in his thoughts. Besides, it also clarifies what the dominant thought of his mind is. Undoubtedly, it is the thoughts of death. Not death, to be specific. He sees death as sleeping. How he thinks about death, reveals the way he thinks about life.

According to him, life means a concoction of troubles and shocks. While death is something that has an embalming effect on his mind. Therefore, he values death over life. When does a person think like that? Just before committing suicide or yielding to death wholeheartedly, such thoughts appear in a person’s mind.

From the next lines, there is an interesting transition in Hamlet’s thinking process. Previously, death seems easier than living. But, when he thinks about the dreams he is going to see in his eternal sleep, he becomes aware of the reality. From his thought process, it becomes clear. According to him, when humans die, they are not aware of what dreams will come in their sleep. It makes them stretch out their sufferings for so long.

Lines 15–21

For who would bear the whips and scorns of time, Th’oppressor’s wrong, the proud man’s contumely, The pangs of dispriz’d love, the law’s delay, The insolence of office, and the spurns That patient merit of th’unworthy takes, When he himself might his quietus make With a bare bodkin?

In this part of the “To be, or not to be” quote, Hamlet’s subconscious mind reminds him about his sufferings. The situations mentioned here have occurred in others’ lives too. Let’s see what Hamlet is saying to the audience.

According to him, none can bear the “whips and scorns” of time. Readers have to take note of the fact that Hamlet is referring to “time” here. Whereas in the first few lines, he talks about “fortune.” So, in one way or another, he is becoming realistic.

The sufferings that time sends are out of one’s control. A person has to bear whatever it sends and react accordingly. There is nothing more he can do to change the course of time as it is against nature. Not only that, Hamlet is quite depressed by the wrongs inflicted upon the innocents by the haughty kings.

The insults of proud men, pangs of unrequited love, delay in judgment, disrespectful behavior of those in power, and last but not least the mistreatment that a “patient merit” receives from the “unworthy” pain him deeply. He is mistreated in all spheres, be it on a personal level such as love, or in public affairs. In all cases, he is the victim. He has gone through all such pangs while he can end his life with a “bare bodkin.” Bodkin is an archaic term for a dagger.

In this way, Hamlet is feeling death is the easiest way to end all the pains and mistreatment he received from others. These lines reveal how the mental tension is reaching its climax.

Lines 21–27

Who would fardels bear, To grunt and sweat under a weary life, But that the dread of something after death, The undiscovere’d country, from whose bourn No traveller returns, puzzles the will, And makes us rather bear those ills we have Than fly to others that we know not of?

The first two lines of this section refer to the fact that none choose to “grunt and sweat” through the exhausting life. In the first line, “fardels” mean the burdens of life. According to the narrator , life seems an exhausting journey that has nothing to offer instead of suffering and pain. To think about life in this way makes the speaker’s mind wearier than before.

From the following lines, Hamlet makes clear why he cannot proceed further and die. He is not sure whether life after death is that smooth as he thinks. It is possible that even after his death, he will not be relieved. He knows death is an “undiscovered country.” Only those who have already gone there know how it is. Besides, nobody can return from death’s dominion. A living being cannot know what happens there.

Such thoughts confuse the speaker more. It puzzles his will to do something that can end his mental pain. Therefore, he has to bear the ills of life throughout the journey than flying to the unknown regions of death. In the last line, Shakespeare uses a rhetorical question to make readers think about what the speaker is trying to mean.

At this point of the whole soliloquy, it becomes crystal clear that Hamlet is not ready to embrace death easily. He is just thinking. At one point, he gives the hint that death seems easier than bearing life’s ills. On the other hand, he negates his idea and says it is better to bear the reality rather than finding solace in perception.

Lines 28–35

Thus conscience doth make cowards of us all, And thus the native hue of resolution Is sicklied o’er with the pale cast of thought, And enterprises of great pith and moment With this regard their currents turn awry And lose the name of action.—Soft you now, The fair Ophelia!—Nymph, in thy orisons Be all my sins remembered.

The last section of the soliloquy, “To be, or not to be” begins with an epigrammatic idea. Here, the speaker says the “conscience doth make cowards of us all.” It means that the fear of death in one’s awareness makes him a coward. In Hamlet’s case, his aware mind makes him confused regarding the happenings after death. Not knowing a solid answer, he makes a coward of himself.

Alongside that, the natural boldness metaphorically referred to as “the native hue of resolution ,” becomes sick for the “pale cast of thought.” In “pale cast of thought,” Shakespeare personifies “thought” and invests it with the idea of casting pale eyes on a person. It means that when Hamlet thinks about death, his natural boldness fades away and he becomes a coward.

In the following lines, he remarks about how he suffers for inaction. According to him, such thoughts stop him from taking great action. It should be taken in a moment. In that place, the currents of action get misdirected and lose the name of action. It means that Hamlet is trying to take the final step but somehow his thoughts are holding him back. For this reason, the action of ending his sufferings loses the name of action.

The last few lines of the soliloquy present how Hamlet stops his musings when he discovers his beloved Ophelia is coming that way. He wishes that she may remember him in her prayers.

Historical Context

The text of “To be, or not to be” is taken from the Second Quarto (Q2) of the play, “Hamlet” which was published in 1604. It is considered the earliest version of the play. William Shakespeare ( Bio | Poems ) wrote, “The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark,” best-known as only “Hamlet” sometime between 1599 and 1601. It is the longest play of Shakespeare containing 29,551 words.

Shakespeare derived the story of Hamlet from the legend of Amleth. He may also have drawn on the play, “Ur-Hamlet,” an earlier Elizabethan play. Scholars believe that Shakespeare wrote this play and later revised it.

Before the 18th century, there was not any concrete idea regarding how the character of Hamlet is. After reading his soliloquies such as “To be, or not to be,” it became more confusing for the scholars to understand what category this Shakespearean hero falls in. Later, the 19th-century scholars valued the character for his internal struggles and tensions.

Through this soliloquy, readers can know a lot about Hamlet’s overall character. Firstly, he is consciously protestant in his thoughts. On the other hand, he is a philosophical character. His monologue, “To be, or not to be, that is the question” expounds the ideas of relativism, existentialism , and skepticism.

Notable Usage

The quote, “To be, or not to be” is the most widely known line and overall Hamlet’s soliloquy has been referenced in several works of theatre, literature, and music. Let’s have a look at some of the works where the opening line of Hamlet’s soliloquy is mentioned.

  • The plot of the comedy , “To Be or Not to Be” by Ernst Lubitsch, is focused on Hamlet’s soliloquy.
  • Charlie Chaplin recites this monologue in the comedy film A King in New York (1957).
  • The line, “To be or not to be” inspired the title of the short story , “2 B R 0 2 B” by Kurt Vonnegut.
  • Black liberation leader Malcolm X quoted the first lines of the soliloquy in a debate in Oxford in 1963 to make a point about “extremism in defense of liberty”.
  • The sixth movie of Star Trek, “Undiscovered Country” was named after the line, “The undiscover’d country, from whose borne…” from the soliloquy.

Let’s watch two of the notable actors portraying the character of Hamlet.

Benedict Cumberbatch

Benedict Cumberbatch performed Hamlet at the Barbican Centre in London in 2015. Let’s see how our on-screen “Sherlock” performs Hamlet’s “To be, or not to be” onstage.

Andrew Scott

At the Almeida, Andrew Scott played Hamlet under the direction of Robert Icke in 2016. It’s interesting to know how “Moriarty” delves deeper into the character through this soliloquy.

In William Shakespeare’s play “Hamlet,” the titular character, Hamlet says this soliloquy .

“To be, or not be” means Hamlet’s mind is torn between two things, “being” and “not being.” “Being” means life and action. While “not being” refers to death and inaction.

The greatest English writer of all time, William Shakespeare wrote: “To be, or not be.” This quote appears in his tragedy Hamlet written sometime between 1599 and 1601.

In Act 3, Scene 1 of the play, Hamlet seems to be puzzled by the question of whether to live or die. He is standing in such a critical situation that life seems painful to bear and death appears to be an escape route from all the sufferings. In this existential crisis, Hamlet utters the soliloquy , “To be, or not to be, that is the question.”

In Shakespeare’s tragedy “Hamlet,” the central figure asks this question to himself. It is the first line of Hamlet’s widely known soliloquy .

This soliloquy is all about a speaker ’s existential crisis. In the play, Hamlet is going through a tough phase. He is torn between life and death, action and inaction. On both the way, he is aware of the fact that he is destined to suffer.

In Act 3 Scene 1 of “Hamlet,” Polonius forces Ophelia to return the love letters of Hamlet. In the meanwhile, he and Claudius watch from afar to understand Hamlet’s reaction. They wait for Ophelia to enter the scene. At that time, Hamlet is seen walking alone in the hall asking whether “to be or not to be.”

The opening line of Hamlet’s soliloquy , “To be, or not to be” is one of the most-quoted lines in English. The lines are famous for their simplicity. At the same time, the lines explore some of the deeper concepts such as action and inaction, life and death. Besides, the repetition of the phrase, “to be” makes this line easy to remember.

In Act 3 Scene 1, Hamlet is seen walking in the hall and musing whether “To be, or not be” to himself. It is a soliloquy that Hamlet speaks directly to the audience to make his thoughts and intentions known to them.

This soliloquy is 33 lines long and contains 262 words. It takes up to 4 minutes to perform.

Similar Quotes

Here is a list of some thought-provoking Shakespearean quotes that are similar to Hamlet’s soliloquy, ‘To be, or not to be” . Explore the greatest Shakespearean poetry and more works of William Shakespeare .

  • All the World’s A Stage from As You Like It – In this monologue, the speaker considers the nature of the world, the roles men and women play, and how one turns old.
  • Is This A Dagger Which I See Before Me from Macbeth – This famous soliloquy of Macbeth describes how he is taken over by guilt and insanity. His imagination brings forth a dagger that symbolizes the impending murder of Duncan.
  • The quality of mercy is not strained from The Merchant of Venice – In this monologue of Ophelia, Shakespeare describes how mercy, an attribute of God, can save a person’s soul and elevate him to the degree of God.
  • Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow from Macbeth – In this soliloquy, the speaker sees life as a meaningless one that leads people to their inevitable death.

You can also read these heartfelt poems about depression  and incredible poems about death .

Get PDFs for this Poem

Log in or join Poetry + to access all PDFs for this poem.

Poem Printables

Home » William Shakespeare » To be, or not to be from Hamlet

Sudip Das Gupta Poetry Expert

About Sudip Das Gupta

Join the poetry chatter and comment.

Exclusive to Poetry + Members

Join Conversations

Share your thoughts and be part of engaging discussions.

Expert Replies

Get personalized insights from our Qualified Poetry Experts.

Connect with Poetry Lovers

Build connections with like-minded individuals.

Rober Juniour

Good morning, I had a few questions.

  • What is the language style of shakespeare in this solliluquy?
  • What is the language technique of shakespeare in this solliluquy?
  • What is the language structure in this solliluquy?
  • Please explain all the literary devices used in here, I am very confused about them.
  • What is the significance of the points presented in the soliloquy?
  • Explain the modern day relevance as well

I am struggling with these questions, if you could reply as fast as possible, it would have been very helpful. Explain them perfectly, please.

Lee-James Bovey

This is a lot of questions! Have you read the article? It has a section on the structure and the techniques used which should answer many of these. So once you have had a read. If you still have a couple of pressing questions I will gladly help you out

Please help me, I know the answers, but how do I explain them?

Have you read the article? As I said to you the answers to most of your questions are in the article. I’m going to assume these questions are for a piece of homework. If that is the case then it’s really important to be able to read and synthesise information. Copying and pasting may get you out of an awkward situation but it won’t help you learn. So with that in mind, if you answer three of these questions (the answers are in the article) I will help you with the others. I don’t mind if the answers aren’t quite right. Do your best. If you head into an exam and right nothing you get no marks. If you give an answer you give yourself the potential to score some marks even if you’re unsure.

Eamonn

You attribute ‘The quality of mercy …’ to Ophelia (similar quotes, supra) when it should be attributed to Portia.

Thank you for highlighting this.

Access the Complete PDF Guide of this Poem

to be or not to be essay

Poetry + PDF Guides are designed to be the ultimate PDF Guides for poetry. The PDF Guide consists of a front cover, table of contents, with the full analysis, including the Poetry+ Review Corner and numerically referenced literary terms, plus much more.

Get the PDF Guide

Experts in Poetry

Our work is created by a team of talented poetry experts, to provide an in-depth look into poetry, like no other.

Cite This Page

Gupta, SudipDas. "To be, or not to be from Hamlet". Poem Analysis , https://poemanalysis.com/william-shakespeare/to-be-or-not-to-be/ . Accessed 25 September 2024.

Poem Analysis Logo

Help Center

Request an Analysis

(not a member? Join now)

Poem PDF Guides

PDF Learning Library

Beyond the Verse Podcast

Poetry Archives

Poetry Explained

Poet Biographies

Useful Links

Poem Explorer

Poem Generator

[email protected]

Poem Solutions Limited, International House, 36-38 Cornhill, London, EC3V 3NG, United Kingdom

Download Poetry PDF Guides

Complete Poetry PDF Guide

Perfect Offline Resource

Covers Everything You Need to Know

One-pager 'snapshot' PDF

Offline Resource

Gateway to deeper understanding

PrepScholar

Choose Your Test

  • Search Blogs By Category
  • College Admissions
  • AP and IB Exams
  • GPA and Coursework

To Be or Not to Be: Analyzing Hamlet's Soliloquy

author image

General Education

feature_hamlet_shakespeare_actor

"To be, or not to be, that is the question."

It’s a line we’ve all heard at some point (and very likely quoted as a joke), but do you know where it comes from and the meaning behind the words? "To be or not to be" is actually the first line of a famous soliloquy from William Shakespeare’s play Hamle t .

In this comprehensive guide, we give you the full text of the Hamlet "To be or not to be" soliloquy and discuss everything there is to know about it, from what kinds of themes and literary devices it has to its cultural impact on society today.

Full Text: "To Be, or Not to Be, That Is the Question"

The famous "To be or not to be" soliloquy comes from William Shakespeare’s play Hamlet (written around 1601) and is spoken by the titular Prince Hamlet in Act 3, Scene 1. It is 35 lines long.

Here is the full text:

To be, or not to be, that is the question, Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, Or to take arms against a sea of troubles, And by opposing end them? To die: to sleep; No more; and by a sleep to say we end The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks That flesh is heir to, 'tis a consummation Devoutly to be wish'd. To die, to sleep; To sleep: perchance to dream: ay, there's the rub; For in that sleep of death what dreams may come When we have shuffled off this mortal coil, Must give us pause: there's the respect That makes calamity of so long life; For who would bear the whips and scorns of time, The oppressor's wrong, the proud man's contumely, The pangs of despised love, the law's delay, The insolence of office and the spurns That patient merit of the unworthy takes, When he himself might his quietus make With a bare bodkin? who would fardels bear, To grunt and sweat under a weary life, But that the dread of something after death, The undiscover'd country from whose bourn No traveller returns, puzzles the will And makes us rather bear those ills we have Than fly to others that we know not of? Thus conscience does make cowards of us all; And thus the native hue of resolution Is sicklied o'er with the pale cast of thought, And enterprises of great pith and moment With this regard their currents turn awry, And lose the name of action.—Soft you now! The fair Ophelia! Nymph, in thy orisons Be all my sins remember'd.

You can also view a contemporary English translation of the speech here .

"To Be or Not to Be": Meaning and Analysis

The "To be or not to be" soliloquy appears in Act 3, Scene 1 of Shakespeare’s Hamlet . In this scene, often called the "nunnery scene," Prince Hamlet thinks about life, death, and suicide. Specifically, he wonders whether it might be preferable to commit suicide to end one's suffering and to leave behind the pain and agony associated with living.

Though he believes he is alone when he speaks, King Claudius (his uncle) and Polonius (the king’s councilor) are both in hiding, eavesdropping.

The first line and the most famous of the soliloquy raises the overarching question of the speech: "To be, or not to be," that is, "To live, or to die."

Interestingly, Hamlet poses this as a question for all of humanity rather than for only himself. He begins by asking whether it is better to passively put up with life’s pains ("the slings and arrows") or actively end it via suicide ("take arms against a sea of troubles, / And by opposing end them?").

Hamlet initially argues that death would indeed be preferable : he compares the act of dying to a peaceful sleep: "And by a sleep to say we end / The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks / That flesh is heir to."

However, he quickly changes his tune when he considers that nobody knows for sure what happens after death , namely whether there is an afterlife and whether this afterlife might be even worse than life. This realization is what ultimately gives Hamlet (and others, he reasons) "pause" when it comes to taking action (i.e., committing suicide).

In this sense, humans are so fearful of what comes after death and the possibility that it might be more miserable than life that they (including Hamlet) are rendered immobile.

body_shakespeare_hamlet_title_page

Inspiration Behind Hamlet and "To Be or Not to Be"

Shakespeare wrote more than three dozen plays in his lifetime, including what is perhaps his most iconic, Hamlet . But where did the inspiration for this tragic, vengeful, melancholy play come from? Although nothing has been verified, rumors abound.

Some claim that the character of Hamlet was named after Shakespeare’s only son Hamnet , who died at age 11 only five years prior to his writing of Hamlet in 1601. If that's the case, the "To be or not to be" soliloquy, which explores themes of death and the afterlife, seems highly relevant to what was more than likely Shakespeare’s own mournful frame of mind at the time.

Others believe Shakespeare was inspired to explore graver, darker themes in his works due to the passing of his own father in 1601 , the same year he wrote Hamlet . This theory seems possible, considering that many of the plays Shakespeare wrote after Hamlet , such as Macbeth and Othello , adopted similarly dark themes.

Finally, some have suggested that Shakespeare was inspired to write Hamlet by the tensions that cropped up during the English Reformation , which raised questions as to whether the Catholics or Protestants held more "legitimate" beliefs (interestingly, Shakespeare intertwines both religions in the play).

These are the three central theories surrounding Shakespeare’s creation of Hamlet . While we can’t know for sure which, if any, are correct, evidently there are many possibilities — and just as likely many inspirations that led to his writing this remarkable play.

3 Critical Themes in "To Be or Not to Be"

  • Doubt and uncertainty
  • Life and death

Theme 1: Doubt and Uncertainty

Doubt and uncertainty play a huge role in Hamlet’s "To be or not to be" soliloquy. By this point in the play, we know that Hamlet has struggled to decide whether he should kill Claudius and avenge his father’s death .

Questions Hamlet asks both before and during this soliloquy are as follows:

  • Was it really the ghost of his father he heard and saw?
  • Was his father actually poisoned by Claudius?
  • Should he kill Claudius?
  • Should he kill himself?
  • What are the consequences of killing Claudius? Of not killing him?

There are no clear answers to any of these questions, and he knows this. Hamlet is struck by indecisiveness, leading him to straddle the line between action and inaction.

It is this general feeling of doubt that also plagues his fears of the afterlife, which Hamlet speaks on at length in his "To be or not to be" soliloquy. The uncertainty of what comes after death is, to him, the main reason most people do not commit suicide; it’s also the reason Hamlet himself hesitates to kill himself and is inexplicably frozen in place .

body_hamlet_horatio_ghost_scene

Theme 2: Life and Death

As the opening line tells us, "To be or not to be" revolves around complex notions of life and death (and the afterlife).

Up until this point in the play, Hamlet has continued to debate with himself whether he should kill Claudius to avenge his father. He also wonders whether it might be preferable to kill himself — this would allow him to escape his own "sea of troubles" and the "slings and arrows" of life.

But like so many others, Hamlet fears the uncertainty dying brings and is tormented by the possibility of ending up in Hell —a place even more miserable than life. He is heavily plagued by this realization that the only way to find out if death is better than life is to go ahead and end it, a permanent decision one cannot take back.

Despite Hamlet's attempts to logically understand the world and death, there are some things he will simply never know until he himself dies, further fueling his ambivalence.

Theme 3: Madness

The entirety of Hamlet can be said to revolve around the theme of madness and whether Hamlet has been feigning madness or has truly gone mad (or both). Though the idea of madness doesn’t necessarily come to the forefront of "To be or not to be," it still plays a crucial role in how Hamlet behaves in this scene.

Before Hamlet begins his soliloquy, Claudius and Polonius are revealed to be hiding in an attempt to eavesdrop on Hamlet (and later Ophelia when she enters the scene). Now, what the audience doesn’t know is whether Hamlet knows he is being listened to .

If he is unaware, as most might assume he is, then we could view his "To be or not to be" soliloquy as the simple musings of a highly stressed-out, possibly "mad" man, who has no idea what to think anymore when it comes to life, death, and religion as a whole.

However, if we believe that Hamlet is aware he's being spied on, the soliloquy takes on an entirely new meaning: Hamlet could actually be feigning madness as he bemoans the burdens of life in an effort to perplex Claudius and Polonius and/or make them believe he is overwhelmed with grief for his recently deceased father.

Whatever the case, it’s clear that Hamlet is an intelligent man who is attempting to grapple with a difficult decision. Whether or not he is truly "mad" here or later in the play is up to you to decide!

4 Key Literary Devices in "To Be or Not to Be"

In the "To be or not to be" soliloquy, Shakespeare has Hamlet use a wide array of literary devices to bring more power, imagination, and emotion to the speech. Here, we look at some of the key devices used , how they’re being used, and what kinds of effects they have on the text.

#1: Metaphor

Shakespeare uses several metaphors in "To be or not to be," making it by far the most prominent literary device in the soliloquy. A metaphor is when a thing, person, place, or idea is compared to something else in non-literal terms, usually to create a poetic or rhetorical effect.

One of the first metaphors is in the line "to take arms against a sea of troubles," wherein this "sea of troubles" represents the agony of life, specifically Hamlet’s own struggles with life and death and his ambivalence toward seeking revenge. Hamlet’s "troubles" are so numerous and seemingly unending that they remind him of a vast body of water.

Another metaphor that comes later on in the soliloquy is this one: "The undiscover'd country from whose bourn / No traveller returns." Here, Hamlet is comparing the afterlife, or what happens after death, to an "undiscovered country" from which nobody comes back (meaning you can’t be resurrected once you’ve died).

This metaphor brings clarity to the fact that death truly is permanent and that nobody knows what, if anything, comes after life.

body_hamlet_skull_book_candle_desk

#2: Metonymy

A metonym is when an idea or thing is substituted with a related idea or thing (i.e., something that closely resembles the original idea). In "To be or not to be," Shakespeare uses the notion of sleep as a substitute for death when Hamlet says, "To die, to sleep."

Why isn’t this line just a regular metaphor? Because the act of sleeping looks very much like death. Think about it: we often describe death as an "eternal sleep" or "eternal slumber," right? Since the two concepts are closely related, this line is a metonym instead of a plain metaphor.

#3: Repetition

The phrase "to die, to sleep" is an example of repetition, as it appears once in line 5 and once in line 9 . Hearing this phrase twice emphasizes that Hamlet is really (albeit futilely) attempting to logically define death by comparing it to what we all superficially know it to be: a never-ending sleep.

This literary device also paves the way for Hamlet’s turn in his soliloquy, when he realizes that it’s actually better to compare death to dreaming because we don’t know what kind of afterlife (if any) there is.

#4: Anadiplosis

A far less common literary device, anadiplosis is when a word or phrase that comes at the end of a clause is repeated at the very beginning of the next clause.

In "To be or not to be," Hamlet uses this device when he proclaims, "To die, to sleep; / To sleep: perchance to dream." Here, the phrase "to sleep" comes at the end of one clause and at the start of the next clause.

The anadiplosis gives us a clear sense of connection between these two sentences . We know exactly what’s on Hamlet’s mind and how important this idea of "sleep" as "death" is in his speech and in his own analysis of what dying entails.

The Cultural Impact of "To Be or Not to Be"

The "To be or not to be" soliloquy in Shakespeare’s Hamlet is one of the most famous passages in English literature, and its opening line, "To be, or not to be, that is the question," is one of the most quoted lines in modern English .

Many who’ve never even read Hamlet (even though it’s said to be one of the greatest Shakespeare plays ) know about "To be or not to be." This is mainly due to the fact that the iconic line is so often quoted in other works of art and literature ⁠— even pop culture .

And it’s not just quoted, either; some people use it ironically or sarcastically .

For example, this Calvin and Hobbes comic from 1994 depicts a humorous use of the "To be or not to be" soliloquy by poking fun at its dreary, melodramatic nature.

Many movies and TV shows have references to "To be or not to be," too. In an episode of Sesame Street , famed British actor Patrick Stewart does a parodic version of the soliloquy ("B, or not a B") to teach kids the letter "B":

There’s also the 1942 movie (and its 1983 remake) To Be or Not to Be , a war comedy that makes several allusions to Shakespeare’s Hamlet . Here’s the trailer for the 1983 version:

Finally, here’s one AP English student’s original song version of "To be or not to be":

As you can see, over the more than four centuries since Hamlet first premiered, the "To be or not to be" soliloquy has truly made a name for itself and continues to play a big role in society.

Conclusion: The Legacy of Hamlet ’s "To Be or Not to Be"

William Shakespeare’s Hamlet is one of the most popular, well-known plays in the world. Its iconic "To be or not to be" soliloquy, spoken by the titular Hamlet in Scene 3, Act 1, has been analyzed for centuries and continues to intrigue scholars, students, and general readers alike.

The soliloquy is essentially all about life and death : "To be or not to be" means "To live or not to live" (or "To live or to die") . Hamlet discusses how painful and miserable human life is, and how death (specifically suicide) would be preferable, would it not be for the fearful uncertainty of what comes after death.

The soliloquy contains three main themes :

It also uses four unique literary devices :

  • Anadiplosis

Even today, we can see evidence of the cultural impact of "To be or not to be," with its numerous references in movies, TV shows, music, books, and art. It truly has a life of its own!

What’s Next?

In order to analyze other texts or even other parts of Hamlet effectively, you'll need to be familiar with common poetic devices , literary devices , and literary elements .

What is iambic pentameter? Shakespeare often used it in his plays —including Hamlet . Learn all about this type of poetic rhythm here .

Need help understanding other famous works of literature? Then check out our expert guides to F. Scott Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby , Arthur Miller's The Crucible , and quotations in Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird .

Looking for help with high school? Our one-on-one online tutoring services can help you study for important exams, review challenging material, or plan out big projects. Get matched with a top tutor who is an expert in the subject you're studying!

Trending Now

How to Get Into Harvard and the Ivy League

How to Get a Perfect 4.0 GPA

How to Write an Amazing College Essay

What Exactly Are Colleges Looking For?

ACT vs. SAT: Which Test Should You Take?

When should you take the SAT or ACT?

Get Your Free

PrepScholar

Find Your Target SAT Score

Free Complete Official SAT Practice Tests

How to Get a Perfect SAT Score, by an Expert Full Scorer

Score 800 on SAT Math

Score 800 on SAT Reading and Writing

How to Improve Your Low SAT Score

Score 600 on SAT Math

Score 600 on SAT Reading and Writing

Find Your Target ACT Score

Complete Official Free ACT Practice Tests

How to Get a Perfect ACT Score, by a 36 Full Scorer

Get a 36 on ACT English

Get a 36 on ACT Math

Get a 36 on ACT Reading

Get a 36 on ACT Science

How to Improve Your Low ACT Score

Get a 24 on ACT English

Get a 24 on ACT Math

Get a 24 on ACT Reading

Get a 24 on ACT Science

Stay Informed

Get the latest articles and test prep tips!

Follow us on Facebook (icon)

Hannah received her MA in Japanese Studies from the University of Michigan and holds a bachelor's degree from the University of Southern California. From 2013 to 2015, she taught English in Japan via the JET Program. She is passionate about education, writing, and travel.

Ask a Question Below

Have any questions about this article or other topics? Ask below and we'll reply!

No Sweat Shakespeare

Hamlet: ‘To Be Or Not To Be, That Is The Question’

‘ To be or not to be , that is the question’  is the most famous soliloquy in the works of Shakespeare – quite possibly the most famous soliloquy in literature. Read Hamlet’s famous soliloquy below with a modern translation and full explanation of the meaning of ‘To be or not to be’. We’ve also pulled together a bunch of commonly asked questions about Hamlet’s famous soliloquy, and have a couple of top performances of the soliloquy to watch.

Jump to section: Full soliloquy | Analysis | Performances | FAQs | Final read

Let’s start with a read-through of Shakespeare’s original lines:

Hamlet’s ‘To Be Or Not To Be’ Speech, Act 3 Scene 1

To be, or not to be: that is the question: Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune , Or to take arms against a sea of troubles, And by opposing end them? To die: to sleep; No more; and by a sleep to say we end The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks That flesh is heir to, ’tis a consummation Devoutly to be wish’d. To die, to sleep; To sleep: perchance to dream : ay, there’s the rub; For in that sleep of death what dreams may come When we have shuffled off this mortal coil, Must give us pause: there’s the respect That makes calamity of so long life; For who would bear the whips and scorns of time, The oppressor’s wrong, the proud man’s contumely, The pangs of despised love, the law’s delay, The insolence of office and the spurns That patient merit of the unworthy takes, When he himself might his quietus make With a bare bodkin? who would fardels bear, To grunt and sweat under a weary life, But that the dread of something after death, The undiscover’d country from whose bourn No traveller returns, puzzles the will And makes us rather bear those ills we have Than fly to others that we know not of? Thus conscience does make cowards of us all; And thus the native hue of resolution Is sicklied o’er with the pale cast of thought, And enterprises of great pith and moment With this regard their currents turn awry, And lose the name of action.–Soft you now! The fair Ophelia! Nymph, in thy orisons Be all my sins remember’d.

Hamlet ‘To Be Or Not To Be’ Analysis

Hamlet is thinking about life and death. It is the great question that Hamlet is asking about human existence in general and his own existence in particular – a reflection on whether it’s better to be alive or to be dead.

The in-depth version

The first six words of the soliloquy establish a balance. There is a direct opposition – to be, or not to be. Hamlet is thinking about life and death and pondering a state of being versus a state of not being – being alive and being dead.

The balance continues with a consideration of the way one deals with life and death. Life is a lack of power: the living are at the mercy of the blows of outrageous fortune. The only action one can take against the things he lists among those blows is to end one’s life. That’s the only way of opposing them. The ‘sleep of death’ is therefore empowering: killing oneself is a way of taking action, taking up arms, opposing and defeating the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune. Living is a passive state; dying is an active state. But in order to reach the condition of death one has to take action in life – charge fully armed against Fortune – so the whole proposition is circular and hopeless because one does not really have the power of action in life.

Death is something desirable – devoutly to be wished, a consummation – a perfect closure. It’s nothing more than a sleep. But there’s a catch, which Hamlet calls a rub. A ‘rub’ is a bowls term meaning an obstacle on the bowls lawn that diverts the bowl, so the fear of the life hereafter is the obstacle that makes us pause and perhaps change the direction of our thinking. We don’t control our dreams so what dreams may come in that sleep in which we have shuffled off all the fuss and bother of life? He uses the term ‘ mortal coil ,’ which is an Elizabethan word for a big fuss, such as there may be in the preparations for a party or a wedding – a lot of things going on and a lot of rushing about. With that thought, Hamlet stops to reconsider. What will happen when we have discarded all the hustle and bustle of life? The problem with the proposition is that the sleep of death is unknown and could be worse than life.

And now Hamlet reflects on a final end. A ‘quietus’ is a legal word meaning a final definitive end to an argument. He opposes this Latin word against the Celtic ‘sweating’ and ‘grunting’ of a living person as an Arab beneath an overwhelmingly heavy load – a fardel, the load carried by a camel. Who would bear that when he could just draw a line under life with something as simple as a knitting needle – a bodkin? It’s quite a big thought and it’s fascinating that this enormous act – drawing a line under life – can be done with something as simple as a knitting needle. And how easy that seems.

Hamlet now lets his imagination wander on the subject of the voyages of discovery and the exploratory expeditions. Dying is like crossing the border between known and unknown geography. One is likely to be lost in that unmapped place, from which one would never return. The implication is that there may be unimagined horrors in that land.

Hamlet now seems to make a decision. He makes the profound judgment that ‘conscience does make cowards of us all,’ This sentence is probably the most important one in the soliloquy. There is a religious dimension to it as it is a sin to take one’s life. So with that added dimension, the fear of the unknown after death is intensified.

But there is more to it than that. It is not just about killing himself but also about the mission he is on – to avenge his father’s death by killing his father’s murderer. Throughout the action of the play, he makes excuses for not killing him and turns away when he has the chance. ‘Conscience does make cowards of us all.’ Convention demands that he kill Claudius but murder is a sin and that conflict is the core of the play.

At the end of the soliloquy, he pulls himself out of this reflective mode by deciding that too much thinking about it is the thing that will prevent the action he has to rise to.

This is not entirely a moment of possible suicide. It’s not that he’s contemplating suicide as much as reflecting on life, and we find that theme all through the text. In this soliloquy, life is burdensome and devoid of power. In another, it’s ‘weary, stale, flat and unprofitable,’ like a garden overrun with weeds. In this soliloquy, Hamlet gives a list of all the things that annoy him about life: the whips and scorns of time, the oppressor’s wrong, the proud man’s contumely, the pangs of despised love, the law’s delay, t he insolence of office and the spurns t hat patient merit of the unworthy takes. But there’s a sense of agonized frustration in this soliloquy that however bad life is we’re prevented from doing anything about it by fear of the unknown.

Watch Two Theatre Greats Recite Hamlet’s Soliloquy

David Tenant as Hamlet in the RSC’s 2009 Hamlet production:

We couldn’t resist but share Patrick Stewart’s comedy take on the soliloquy for Sesame Street!

Commonly Asked Questions About ‘To Be Or Not To Be’

Why is hamlet’s ‘to be or not to be’ speech so famous.

This is partly because the opening words are so interesting, memorable and intriguing, but also because Shakespeare ranges around several cultures and practices to borrow the language for his images. Just look at how many now-famous phrases are used in the speech – ‘take arms’, ‘what dreams may come’, ‘sea of troubles’, ‘to sleep perchance to dream’. ‘sleep of death’, ‘whether tis nobler’, ‘flesh is heir’, ‘must give us pause’, ‘mortal coil’, ‘suffer the slings and arrows’, outrageous fortune’, ‘the insolence of office’… the list goes on and on.

Add to this the fact that Shakespeare is dealing with profound concepts, putting complex philosophical ideas into the mouth of a character on a stage, and communicating with an audience with a wide range of educational levels, and you have a selection of reasons as to why this soliloquy is as famous as it is. Just look at how many now phrases

How long is ‘To be or not to be’?

The ‘To be or not to be’ soliloquy is 33 lines long, and consists of 262 words. Hamlet, the play in which ‘to be or not to be’ occurs is Shakespeare’s longest play with 4,042 lines. It takes four hours to perform  Hamlet  on the stage, with the ‘to be or not to be’ soliloquy taking anywhere from two to four minutes.

Why is ‘To be or not to be’ so important?

‘To be or not to be’ is not important in itself but it has gained tremendous significance in that it is perhaps the most famous phrase in all the words of the playwright considered to be the greatest writer in the English language. It is also significant in the play,  Hamlet , itself in that it goes directly to the heart of the play’s meaning.

Why does Hamlet say ‘To be or not to be’?

To be or not to be’ is a soliloquy of Hamlet’s – meaning that although he is speaking aloud to the audience none of the other characters can hear him. Soliloquies were a convention of Elizabethan plays where characters spoke their thoughts to the audience. Hamlet says ‘To be or not to be’ because he is questioning the value of life and asking himself whether it’s worthwhile hanging in there. He is extremely depressed at this point and fed up with everything in the world around him, and he is contemplating putting an end to himself.

Is ‘To be or not to be’ a metaphor?

The line ‘To be or not to be’ is very straightforward and direct, and has no metaphorical aspect at all. It’s a simple statement made up of five two-letter words and one of three – it’s so simple that a child in the early stages of learning to read can read it. Together with the sentence that follows it  – ‘that is the question – it is a simple question about human existence. The rest of the soliloquy goes on to use a number of metaphors.

What is Shakespeare saying in ‘To be or not to be’?

In the ‘To be or not be to’ soliloquy Shakespeare has his Hamlet character speak theses famous lines. Hamlet is wondering whether he should continue to be, meaning to exist or remain alive, or to not exist – in other words, commit suicide. His thoughts about that develop in the rest of the soliloquy.

Why is ‘To be or not to be’ so memorable?

Ask people to quote a line of Shakespeare and more often than not it’s ‘To be or not to be’ that’s mentioned. So just what is it that makes this line of Shakespeare’s so memorable?

The line is what is  known as a chiasmus  because of its balance and structure, and that’s what makes it memorable. Look at this chiasmus from John F Kennedy: ‘Do not ask what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country.’  Far more complex than Shakespeare’s line but even so, having heard it one could never forget it. The first and second halves mirror each other, the second being an inversion of the first. Winston Churchill’s speeches are full of chiasma. Even when he is joking they flow: ‘All babies look like me, but then I look like all babies.’

Chiasma are always short and snappy and say a lot in their repetition of words and their balance. And so it is with Hamlet’s speech that starts ‘to be or not to be’, arguably Shakespeare’s most memorable line – in the collective conscience centuries after the words were written and performed.

Look at the balance of the line. It has only four words: ‘to,’ ‘be,’ ‘or’ and ‘not.’ The fact is that the language is as simple as language can get but the ideas are extremely profound. ‘To take arms against a sea of troubles,’ for example, and ‘To die, to sleep, no more, but in that sleep of death what dreams may come,’ every word but one monosyllabic, go right to the heart of human existence and the deepest dilemmas of life.

Let’s try reading it again…

If you’re still with us, you should now have a pretty good understanding of the true meaning behind the words of Hamlet’s ‘To be or not to be’ speech. You may have also watched two fantastic actors speak the immortal words, so should have a much clearer understanding of what messages the soliloquy is trying to convey.

With all of this in mind, why not try reading the words aloud to yourself one more time:

David Tennant speaks Hamlet's 'To be or not to be' soliloquy

David Tennant speaks Hamlet’s ‘To be or not to be’ soliloquy

And that’s all for this take on Hamlet’s immortal lines. Did this page help you? Any information we’re missing that would be useful? Please do let us know in the comments section below!

scott

“To be or not to be is straight forward and not a metaphor” Actually it can be read as metaphor ie. “To kill or or to kill”. The entire thing can be read as Hamlet questioning if he should kill the King.

Leave a Reply

Leave a reply cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

See All Hamlet Resources

Hamlet | Hamlet summary | Hamlet characters : Claudius , Fortinbras , Horatio , Laertes , Ophelia . Osric , Polonius , Rosencrantz and Guildenstern | Hamlet settings | Hamlet themes  | Hamlet in modern English | Hamlet full text | Modern Hamlet ebook | Hamlet for kids ebooks | Hamlet quotes | Hamlet quote translations | Hamlet monologues | Hamlet soliloquies | Hamlet performance history | All about ‘To Be Or Not To Be’

Looking to pay someone who can help with your paper on any Hamlet topic?

AffordablePapers will write your essay for you, cheap with fast delivery.

follow on facebook

Pardon Our Interruption

As you were browsing something about your browser made us think you were a bot. There are a few reasons this might happen:

  • You've disabled JavaScript in your web browser.
  • You're a power user moving through this website with super-human speed.
  • You've disabled cookies in your web browser.
  • A third-party browser plugin, such as Ghostery or NoScript, is preventing JavaScript from running. Additional information is available in this support article .

To regain access, please make sure that cookies and JavaScript are enabled before reloading the page.

Interesting Literature

A Summary and Analysis of Shakespeare’s ‘To be or not to be’ soliloquy from Hamlet

By Dr Oliver Tearle (Loughborough University)

‘To be, or not to be, that is the question’: perhaps one of the most famous lines in all of English literature, but arguably also one of the most mysterious – and one of the most misread. Hamlet’s soliloquy from William Shakespeare’s play is rightly celebrated for being a meditation on the nature of life and death, but some interpretations of the soliloquy serve to reduce the lines to a more simplistic meaning. So what does ‘To be or not to be’ really mean?

To be, or not to be, that is the question: Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune

Virtually everyone knows the line, ‘To be, or not to be: that is the question’. Whether we hear Laurence Olivier reciting them, or erroneously picture some other great Shakespearean actor pronouncing these words while holding a skull (which actually belongs in the later gravedigger scene), ‘To be or not to be’ is one of the most famous six-line phrases from all of English literature.

But interestingly, in the first printing of  Hamlet , the lines were quite different (see the image from the Quarto, below right): ‘To be, or not to be: that is the question’ was instead ‘To be, or not to be, I there’s the point’ (this version may have been actors or audience-members misremembering the lines from the play and trying to reconstruct them from memory).

Yet the precise meaning of these words, and the lines that follow, is often analysed in a way that not only reduces the ambiguity of the lines to a simple and straightforward narrative (Hamlet is pondering whether to kill himself or not) but also risks losing sight of the broader context in which they appear, namely the play Hamlet viewed as a whole.

For if there is one thing that marks Hamlet (and the character, Hamlet), it is his supposed vacillation, his indecision, his delaying: and his dilatoriness centres on his failure to take revenge on his uncle, Claudius, for the murder of his father, Old Hamlet.

What makes ‘To be or not to be’ such a cryptic utterance is that the lines telegraph, and even actively elide, the full thought which Hamlet is mulling over. Should ‘To be or not to be’ be silently completed by us as ‘To be alive or not to be alive’ (the ‘suicide’ interpretation), or as ‘To be an avenger or not to be an avenger’ (bringing in the revenge plot of the play)?

The problem is that the lines which follow, far from being specifically about the pros and cons of killing oneself, can actually be used to support either interpretation.

To ‘suffer / The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, / Or to take arms against a sea of troubles / And by opposing end them’ sounds like somebody wondering whether to carry on living or to end it all, but these lines might just as easily refer to Hamlet’s dilemma over whether to accept the challenge mounted by the Ghost (avenge his murdered father) or to stand by and passively let things play out as ‘fortune’ decrees.

The lines that follow:

To die—to sleep, No more; and by a sleep to say we end The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks That flesh is heir to

Seem to be more specifically focused on the suicide question, but even here there is some ambiguity. Given that the Ghost of his dead father is firmly on young Hamlet’s mind, he is also meditating here on what happens when we die (not just on what might happen when he dies).

The Ghost appears to call into question that ‘to die’ is ‘to sleep’, since Old Hamlet has not been allowed to rest; he is a ‘traveller’ who has returned from that ‘undiscovered country’ beyond the grave.

Hamlet’s delaying tactics are themselves often misinterpreted. Is it fair to say that Hamlet delays? Yes. Is it fair to say that he delays because he is indecisive? That’s less certain. He certainly gives us that impression, and torments himself for being not ‘man’ enough to avenge his father.

But Hamlet’s ‘failure’ to act immediately is actually downright sensible, since he wants to be sure that the Ghost which he spoke to, which assumed the form of his father, actually was his father and spoke truth to him, rather than being some mischievous demon sent to goad him to murder an innocent man. This is why he puts on the ‘play within a play’ (actually called The Murder of Gonzago , but which Hamlet wittily renames The Mousetrap ): to try to collect evidence of Claudius’ guilt.

As this is a soliloquy from a Shakespeare play, ‘To be or not to be’ is in iambic pentameter – specifically, unrhymed iambic pentameter, or blank verse . But there are a number of variations. Should we stress ‘that’ or ‘is’ in ‘that is the question’? Although ‘ that is the question’ may be more common an interpretation, ‘that is the question’ is viable too.

For our money, the best interpretation of Shakespeare’s lines was by the great actor Paul Scofield; you can hear him reciting ‘To be or not to be’ here . For more about the play, see our analysis of  Hamlet and our study of the character of Hamlet . You might also find our analysis of another of Hamlet’s soliloquies, ‘ O, that this too too solid flesh would melt ’, of interest.

About Hamlet

to be or not to be essay

But despite – or, perhaps, because of – this emotional intensity and complexity, actors down the ages have been keen to put their own stamp on the role, including David Garrick (who had a special wig that made Hamlet’s hair stand on end when the ghost of his father appeared), Laurence Olivier, John Gielgud, Mel Gibson, Sarah Bernhardt (one of many women to portray the Prince of Denmark), Ethan Hawke, Keanu Reeves, Kenneth Branagh, Maxine Peake, and even John Wilkes Booth, the man who assassinated Abraham Lincoln.

Discover more from Interesting Literature

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Type your email…

13 thoughts on “A Summary and Analysis of Shakespeare’s ‘To be or not to be’ soliloquy from Hamlet”

  • Pingback: Five Fascinating Facts about Hamlet | Interesting Literature
  • Pingback: Seven of the Best Speeches from Shakespeare Plays | Interesting Literature
  • Pingback: Logic Has Nothing to Do with It | Pat Bean's blog

This post earned a Bean Pat as blog pick of the day. Check it out at https://patbean.net

In support of the revenge motive, Hamlet faces off against a powerful and popular king, albeit a usurper, who’s dangerous and also loved by his mother whose own motives are suspect. Claudius was more the politician/ruler and Hamlet the Renaissance scholar, one strong in arms, the other whose demise allowed Fortinbras (“strong in arms”) to invade and take over Denmark at the end. While Claudius was on the throne, Hamlet struggled to overthrow him until he was sure of his guilt. Part of the play’s genius is Claudius’ own soul-searching guilt that had Hamlet known, would have led to sooner action on the part of the prince. Throughout, as audience we are brought into the many deliberations knowing more than the characters inside the play know and wondering who we are as a result of Hamlet discovering himself. The opening words of the play tell it all: Who’s there?

I think you have to work hard to interpret this as not contemplating his fear of death and what lies beyond. That’s not to say the issue of revenge isn’t there – of course it is, Hamlet wouldn’t be contemplating death if not for the foul deed the ghost has laid before him!

As far as the stress on ‘that’ or ‘is’, I think this link should solve this… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEs8rK5Cqt8

Thanks, Ken. I absolutely agree that Hamlet is contemplating death here, but as you say, it’s his *fear* of death – and what awaits him afterwards – that lurks behind his words. If he chooses to ‘avenge’ his father and kill Claudius, and he’s been tricked by the Ghost and Claudius was innocent, hell awaits him. The fact that he refers to the afterlife as the ‘undiscover’d country, from whose bourn / No traveller returns’ when he’s recently been visited by a traveller who has returned (i.e. his father), suggests that he’s still doubting the truth of the Ghost. But this is perhaps partly why the lines have attained the status they have: they resist any narrowly reductive take that sees this as exclusively a ‘suicide speech’ (or similar). I may need to go and reread the play now…

I’ve just been working with the play with A level students recently so it is very fresh in my mind. I’ve grown to love the speech when, perhaps, I’ve tended to let ‘familiarity breed contempt’ in the past. It’s a superb rendering of anguish over a ‘do I, don’t I?’ situation which, of course, has eternal consequences. The Ghost also reveals there’s doubt over the ‘perchance to dream’ that death should be – what if Hamlet is to die and roam the Earth in torment like his father?! What would we choose, I wonder…

As an aside, and fearing ruining what little reputation I might have(!) – for my money the best Hamlet of all is Mel Gibson. I genuinely rate him over all the so-called ‘serious’ Shakespearean actors (yes, even over Olivier) and recommend his film version to all students who want a believable rather than stylised rendition of the character.

Reblogged this on Manolis .

Hamlet tells us what the speech is about in lines 2-5, where he explains what he means by “To be or not to be”. He means that there are two options for him: these options are: in lines 2-3, to put up with random unpleasantness from Claudius and others; in lines 4-5, to actually do something, viz. to take up arms, to fight, and possibly, within the context of the plot, to kill Claudius. As a result of killing Claudius, Hamlet might well die himself.

The natural meaning of “take arms against a sea of troubles” etc is to battle some exterior force; to grab weapons to do battle against the sea which is out there, not here, and certainly not inside us. Or, if the sea were metaphorically inside him, and were an interior enemy, he would need to make that clear, which he does not do. The meaning remains, imho, the clear and patent one, rather than a reference to suicide.

So the dilemma is to put up, or to take action; and this is set out clearly at the start. However, as you say, there is some shadow of suicide in the words of the first line too; and this shadow comes to life when the “bare bodkin” is mentioned later. The speech is about putting up (and choosing life), or not putting up (and maybe choosing death), and the implications of this choice in the next world and this one. Hovering above the text (or lurking beneath it) is the idea that suicide could be an option, too.

It’s always interesting to hear a new perspective on this soliloquy.

  • Pingback: 15 Types Of Poems Every Writer Should Know About
  • Pingback: Hamlet: Key Quotes Explained – Interesting Literature

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Encyclopedia Britannica

  • History & Society
  • Science & Tech
  • Biographies
  • Animals & Nature
  • Geography & Travel
  • Arts & Culture
  • Games & Quizzes
  • On This Day
  • One Good Fact
  • New Articles
  • Lifestyles & Social Issues
  • Philosophy & Religion
  • Politics, Law & Government
  • World History
  • Health & Medicine
  • Browse Biographies
  • Birds, Reptiles & Other Vertebrates
  • Bugs, Mollusks & Other Invertebrates
  • Environment
  • Fossils & Geologic Time
  • Entertainment & Pop Culture
  • Sports & Recreation
  • Visual Arts
  • Demystified
  • Image Galleries
  • Infographics
  • Top Questions
  • Britannica Kids
  • Saving Earth
  • Space Next 50
  • Student Center
  • Introduction

Meaning and interpretations

Literary and pop culture references, the monologue.

John Gielgud as Hamlet

To be, or not to be

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

  • Table Of Contents

To be, or not to be , opening line of a monologue spoken by the character Hamlet in Act III, scene 1, of William Shakespeare ’s revenge tragedy Hamlet (c. 1599–1601). Often referred to as a soliloquy , the speech technically does not meet that term’s strictest definition—that is, a monologue delivered by an actor alone onstage—because Ophelia , the object of Hamlet’s fickle affections, is also present, though Hamlet does not speak directly to her until the speech’s very end. The scene in which “to be, or not to be” appears is sometimes referred to as “the nunnery scene,” because Hamlet spurns Ophelia by telling her to “get thee to a nunnery” rather than wed him or another.

How is soliloquy used in Shakespeare's tragedy Hamlet?

The monologue communicates Hamlet’s fixation on the play’s primary moral question: whether it is right for Hamlet to avenge his father’s death by killing his father’s suspected murderer, Claudius . The speech also conveys Hamlet’s obsession with the concepts of life (“to be”) and death (“not to be”). At first, Hamlet considers that death may be merely “a sleep ” that could “end / The heart-ache” inherent in being human , but then he frets over “what dreams may come” in “that sleep of death.” This uncertainty is “the rub,” or the crux of the question. With no certain knowledge of what happens after “we have shuffled off this mortal coil,” humans must suffer all of life’s indignities (“the whips and scorns of time , / The oppressor’s wrong”). Otherwise, who would bear such burdens (“these fardels”)? Death is an “undiscover’d country” that might arouse curiosity, but it is a dreadful one “from whose bourn / No traveller returns.”

The speech is typically interpreted as expressing Hamlet’s fear that, by killing his uncle Claudius, he will be committing a grievous sin , the consequence of which will be the eternal damnation of his soul . It has also been interpreted as an indication that Hamlet is considering suicide , an act that is echoed later in the play in Ophelia’s death by drowning , which may or may not have been accidental. Whether “to be, or not to be” specifically refers to Hamlet’s desire to kill Claudius or himself, both interpretations have strong defenders and detractors. The monologue’s layered meanings highlight the complexity of Hamlet’s psychological makeup and of Shakespeare’s gifts for strong characterization through the use of language .

“To be, or not to be” is one of Shakespeare’s most famous phrases and one of the most famous phrases in English literature . It is no exaggeration to say that it is impossible to catalog all the times it has been referred to in other literary works and in popular culture . For example, a burlesque of the speech appears in Mark Twain ’s novel Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (1884), in a chapter in which Huck and his friend Jim are joined on their Mississippi River raft by two traveling con artists who are passing themselves off as an English duke and the king of France . The con men plan to put on a production of Shakespeare in the next town on their schedule. The duke attempts to teach the king “Hamlet’s soliloquy…the most celebrated thing in Shakespeare.” But with no copy of the play at hand, the duke must “piece it out from memory,” resulting in a comical mishmash of lines from various speeches in Hamlet and other Shakespearean plays that incorrectly begins, “To be, or not to be; that is the bare bodkin.”

To Be or Not to Be

Ernst Lubitsch ’s brilliant satirical film To Be or Not to Be (1942) follows two married members of an acting troupe, played by Jack Benny and Carole Lombard , who get caught up in a search for a German spy in World War II -era Poland . Mel Brooks and Anne Bancroft took on the same roles in a 1983 remake. Kurt Vonnegut ’s 1962 short story “2 B R 0 2 B” (the “0” in the title is pronounced “naught”) explores a dystopian world where population control is achieved by government-mandated infanticide and assisted suicide . Those who want to avail themselves of the government’s macabre services can call a hotline, the number for which is the same as the story’s title. In the cult flick Last Action Hero (1993), Arnold Schwarzenegger plays an action movie star named Jack Slater who is the favorite actor of a young boy named Danny. When Danny becomes bored while watching the 1948 film version of Hamlet starring Laurence Olivier , he imagines Jack Slater in the role. His imaginary version comes complete with a movie trailer in which tough guy Hamlet chomps on a cigar , wields an Uzi , and delivers the opening line of the famous speech—and gives it an answer—as a church explodes behind him: “To be or not to be? Not to be.”

Other lines from the monologue have found their way into pop culture. The sci-fi film Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country (1991) is named for Hamlet’s lines “The undiscover’d country from whose bourn / No traveller returns,” and a Klingon character quotes Shakespeare’s work in the alien language. Indeed, another character claims, “You have not experienced Shakespeare until you have read him in the original Klingon.” P.D. James ’s chilling novel The Children of Men (1992) borrows the word quietus (from the lines “That patient merit of the unworthy takes, / When he himself might his quietus make / With a bare bodkin?”) for the name of a government program that forces older adults to participate in mass suicide so as not to become a burden on society. In the novel’s 2006 film adaptation , directed by Alfonso Cuarón , the term is used as the name of a suicide-facilitation kit in the form of a self-administered drug.

to be or not to be essay

The full speech reads as follows:

To be, or not to be, that is the question: Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, Or to take arms against a sea of troubles, And by opposing end them? To die—to sleep, No more; and by a sleep to say we end The heart-ache, and the thousand natural shocks That flesh is heir to: ’tis a consummation Devoutly to be wish’d. To die, to sleep. To sleep, perchance to dream—ay, there’s the rub, For in that sleep of death what dreams may come, When we have shuffled off this mortal coil, Must give us pause. There’s the respect That makes calamity of so long life. For who would bear the whips and scorns of time, The oppressor’s wrong, the proud man’s contumely, The pangs of dispriz’d love, the law’s delay, The insolence of office, and the spurns That patient merit of the unworthy takes, When he himself might his quietus make With a bare bodkin? Who would these fardels bear, To grunt and sweat under a weary life, But that the dread of something after death, The undiscover’d country from whose bourn No traveller returns, puzzles the will, And makes us rather bear those ills we have Than fly to others that we know not of? Thus conscience does make cowards of us all, And thus the native hue of resolution Is sicklied o’er with the pale cast of thought, And enterprises of great pith and moment, With this regard their currents turn awry And lose the name of action. Soft you now, The fair Ophelia! Nymph, in thy orisons Be all my sins remember’d.

Literopedia

  • English Literature
  • Short Stories
  • Literary Terms
  • Web Stories

To Be Or Not To Be: Hamlet’s Soliloquy Summary and Analysis

Table of Contents

To Be Or Not To Be: Hamlet’s Soliloquy Summary and Analysis 

To Be Or Not To Be: Hamlet’s Soliloquy Summary and Analysis , To Be or Not to Be | Soliloquy, Overview & Analysis, To Be or Not to Be: Analyzing Hamlet’s Soliloquy, Hamlet Act 3 Scene 1 | Shakespeare Learning Zone William Shakespeare’s timeless play, “Hamlet,” is celebrated for its profound exploration of the human psyche, and one of its most iconic moments is Hamlet’s soliloquy from Act 3, Scene 1. The soliloquy begins with the immortal words, “To be, or not to be: that is the question,” and delves into the complex nature of existence, contemplating the struggles of life, death, and the moral dilemmas that plague the protagonist, Prince Hamlet. 

Opening Lines – The Question of Existence:

The soliloquy commences with Hamlet pondering the fundamental question of existence. The juxtaposition of “To be” and “not to be” sets the stage for a contemplative exploration of life and death. Hamlet grapples with the inherent struggles of human existence, questioning whether it is nobler to endure the hardships of life or to seek relief in the unknown realm of death. The use of this dichotomy serves as a thematic anchor, inviting the audience to delve into the intricacies of mortality and the human experience.

The Perils of Endurance – The “Slings and Arrows”:

As the soliloquy unfolds, Hamlet delves into the hardships that make life a formidable journey. The famous phrase, “The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,” vividly captures the adversities and challenges that individuals face. This evocative language paints a picture of life’s relentless assaults, suggesting that enduring the blows of fate requires a level of resilience that may exceed the capacities of many. Hamlet’s internal struggle becomes a universal reflection on the human condition, resonating with audiences across centuries.

Contemplating Death – The “Sea of Troubles”:

The soliloquy takes a poignant turn as Hamlet contemplates the idea of death. The metaphorical expression “sea of troubles” conjures an image of life’s vast and turbulent challenges, portraying death as a tempting escape from the ceaseless waves of adversity. Hamlet grapples with the notion that death could be a sleep free from the troubles that plague the living. This contemplation marks a pivotal moment in the soliloquy, revealing Hamlet’s internal conflict and setting the stage for a deeper exploration of morality and the afterlife.

The Fear of the Unknown – “The Undiscovered Country”:

Hamlet’s contemplation of death extends to the fear of the unknown, encapsulated in the phrase “undiscovered country.” This metaphorical expression not only refers to death as an uncharted territory but also alludes to the uncertainty surrounding the afterlife. Hamlet’s hesitation to embrace death stems from the fear of what lies beyond, emphasizing the human instinct to cling to the familiar, even in the face of suffering. This fear of the unknown adds a layer of complexity to Hamlet’s internal struggle and reflects the broader human anxiety surrounding mortality.

The Dilemma of Choice – “Conscience Doth Make Cowards of Us All”:

The soliloquy reaches its emotional zenith as Hamlet grapples with the dilemma of choice. The famous line, “Thus conscience does make cowards of us all,” encapsulates Hamlet’s internal conflict between action and inaction. The reference to conscience as a source of cowardice unveils the profound psychological burden that moral considerations impose on the human psyche. Hamlet’s struggle becomes emblematic of the universal tension between the desire for justice and the paralyzing effects of moral introspection.

The Irony of Fate – “Enterprises of Great Pitch and Moment”:

Hamlet’s contemplation on the consequences of action or inaction introduces the irony of fate, captured in the phrase “enterprises of great pitch and moment.” This expression highlights the weightiness of significant endeavors and the potential for unforeseen outcomes. Hamlet recognizes that even the noblest intentions may lead to tragic consequences, adding a layer of fatalism to his internal turmoil. The irony lies in the juxtaposition of the importance of action with the unpredictable nature of its outcomes, creating a sense of tragic inevitability. To Be Or Not To Be: Hamlet’s Soliloquy Summary and Analysis , To Be or Not to Be | Soliloquy, Overview & Analysis

The Power of Language – “Soft You Now!”:

As the soliloquy nears its conclusion, Hamlet’s attention shifts to the immediate surroundings, providing insight into his complex character. The sudden exclamation, “Soft you now!” signals a shift from introspection to external awareness. This transition emphasizes Hamlet’s ability to navigate between profound philosophical contemplation and acute situational awareness. The interplay between the internal and external worlds showcases the multifaceted nature of Hamlet’s character and reinforces the power of language as a tool for both introspection and interaction.

Closing Reflection – The Legacy of Hamlet’s Soliloquy:

In the final lines of the soliloquy, Hamlet reflects on the consequences of inaction, acknowledging that the fear of the unknown and the complexities of life often lead individuals to endure their sufferings silently. This acknowledgment serves as a poignant commentary on the human condition, resonating across time and cultural boundaries. Hamlet’s soliloquy, with its rich tapestry of language and profound insights, continues to captivate audiences and scholars alike, leaving an indelible mark on the exploration of existential themes in literature.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, Hamlet’s soliloquy is a masterful exploration of the human experience, weaving together themes of life, death, morality, and the consequences of choice. Through evocative language, metaphorical richness, and profound introspection, Shakespeare invites audiences to contemplate the complexities of existence through the lens of his tragic protagonist. Hamlet’s soliloquy stands as a timeless testament to the enduring power of Shakespeare’s language and the universal relevance of the questions it poses. To Be Or Not To Be: Hamlet’s Soliloquy Summary and Analysis , To Be or Not to Be | Soliloquy, Overview & Analysis

Related Posts

Which novel by jane austen has the subtitle “a novel of manners”, brave new world by aldous huxley | context, summary & characters.

I Wanted the Impossible by Heather Clark

I Wanted the Impossible by Heather Clark

to be or not to be essay

Attempt a critical appreciation of The Triumph of Life by P.B. Shelley.

Consider The Garden by Andrew Marvell as a didactic poem.

Consider The Garden by Andrew Marvell as a didactic poem.

Why does Plato want the artists to be kept away from the ideal state

Why does Plato want the artists to be kept away from the ideal state

Do any of the characters surprise you at any stage in the novel Tamas

Do any of the characters surprise you at any stage in the novel Tamas

William Shakespeare Biography and Works

William Shakespeare Biography and Works

Discuss the theme of freedom in Frederick Douglass' Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass

Discuss the theme of freedom in Frederick Douglass’ Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass

How does William Shakespeare use the concept of power in Richard III

How does William Shakespeare use the concept of power in Richard III

Analyze the use of imagery in William Shakespeare's sonnets

Analyze the use of imagery in William Shakespeare’s sonnets

Meg 05 literary criticism & theory solved assignment 2024-25, name an australian author known for their memoirs, what is the significance of the character “nathanial delaney” in “the secret river”.

Poem Summary Easter by Jill Alexander Essbaum Line by Line Explanation

Poem Summary Easter by Jill Alexander Essbaum Line by Line Explanation

  • Advertisement
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Other Links

© 2023 Literopedia

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Remember Me

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Are you sure want to unlock this post?

Are you sure want to cancel subscription.

-->
directory




To be, or not to be: that is the question:
Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The and arrows of ,
Or to take arms against a sea of troubles,
? To die: to sleep;
No more; and by a sleep to say we end
The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks (70)
That flesh is heir to, 'tis a
Devoutly to be wish'd. To die, to sleep;
To sleep: perchance to dream: ay, there's the ;
For in that sleep of death what dreams may come
When we have ,
Must give us pause: there's the
That ;
For who would bear the whips and scorns of ,
The oppressor's wrong, ,
The pangs of love, the law's delay, (80)
The insolence of office and the spurns



That patient merit of the unworthy takes,
When he himself might
With a ? who would bear,
To grunt and sweat under a weary life,
But that the dread of something after death,
The undiscover'd country from whose
, puzzles the will
And makes us rather bear those ills we have
Than fly to others that we know not of? (90)
Thus does make cowards of us all;
And thus the ,
And enterprises of
,
And lose the name of action.-- !
The fair Ophelia! Nymph, in thy
Be all my sins remember'd.



______________



: Hamlet and Divine Justice
















































, A. C. Bradey notes that "The present position of the 'To be or not to be' soliloquy, and of the interview with Ophelia, appears to have been due to an after-thought of Shakespeare's; for in the First Quarto they precede, instead of following, the arrival of the players, and consequently the arrangement for the play-scene. This is a notable instance of the truth that 'inspiration' is by no means confined to a poet's first conceptions." Does the position of Hamlet's soliloquy make a difference?
In writing , Shakespeare is said to have been influenced by the work of French essayist, Michael de Montaigne, translated by an acquaintance of Shakespeare named John Florio. Montagine's essays on moral philosophy might have shaped many passages in , including Hamlet's most famous soliloquy. Could Montaigne be the reason the first and second quartos of the play are , especially regarding Hamlet's propensity to delay? .

Are you seeking one-on-one college counseling and/or essay support? Limited spots are now available. Click here to learn more.

To Be or Not to Be: Expert Analysis of Hamlet’s Soliloquy for Teens

June 7, 2023

From Calvin and Hobbes to Star Trek to The Simpsons, Hamlet’s soliloquy “To Be or Not To Be” is one of the most commonly cited lines of Shakespeare. But beyond the evocative first line, what is the underlying meaning and analysis? We will dive into an analysis of Hamlet’s soliloquy shortly but first some brief context.

Hamlet Summary – Putting “To Be or Not to Be” in context

The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark , more often referred to simply as Hamlet, is one of the English playwright William Shakespeare’s most well-known plays. It was written likely between 1599 and 1601. The play centers on Prince Hamlet, who is distraught with grief around his father’s murder. At the start of the play, Hamlet is confronted by his father’s ghost who informs him that the king was murdered by the king’s own brother (Hamlet’s uncle), Claudius, who has inherited the throne and married his widow (and Hamlet’s mother), Gertrude.

While at first singularly committed to avenging his father’s death, Hamlet’s contemplative nature causes him to oscillate between the desire to act immediately and melancholic reluctance, rageful vengeance, and existential despair. This context helps us understand the tense conundrums expounded upon in this soliloquy. However, as one can see from its widespread citation, one can also perform an analysis of Hamlet’s soliloquy “To Be or Not To Be” on its own.

What is a Soliloquy?

A soliloquy is a specific kind of monologue. It entails a single character speaking for a period of time while alone. In other words, the character is talking aloud to themselves. (For more examples and explanations of “soliloquy”, check out this link !). Now let’s walk through the text itself.

Hamlet’s Soliloquy – Meaning & Analysis

He begins with that well-known line:

“To be, or not to be: that is the question.” Already the stakes are high. Hamlet is essentially asking whether to choose life or death, being or not being, endurance or suicide. He goes on to say “Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer / The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune , /Or to take arms against a sea of troubles, / And by opposing end them?”

This elaborates and complicates on the binary of life or death set up in the first line. He wonders if would be more honorable to endure the suffering he faces due to his terrible and painful “fortune” or to end both his life and troubles in one fell swoop. Take note as well of the military figurative language peppered throughout his personal monologue, such as in words like “noble,” “take arms,” and “the slings and arrows.” As a prince embroiled in royal drama, his intimate woes are entangled with the national politics. Often, this means bloody war. Furthermore, the metaphors signal that there is a war within his own mind due to his agonizing situation. While desiring relief from life’s suffering, he is not totally resolved to die.

He turns to contemplate death, saying:

“To die: to sleep; / No more; and by a sleep to say we end / The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks / That flesh is heir to, ’tis a consummation / Devoutly to be wish’d.”

He equates death to sleep, where suicide is framed not as violent but as a restful space that ends the “heart-ache” and pain he endures in wakeful life. The isolation of “No more” is emphatic and multifaceted. It signals both no more life and no more suffering. He also emphasizes the many forms of pain he desires respite from. There is the “thousand natural shocks” that, through the word natural, evoke an inevitable yet immense pain and then there is the “heart-ache” that appears more intentional and singular in the specific murder of his father. His father’s death and his princely position is further invoked through the word “heir,” given that he is the heir to his father’s crown. Death is a desired (“devoutly…wish’d”) ending (“consummation”) to these manifold sufferings.

“To Be or Not to Be” Soliloquy- Meaning & Analysis (Continued)

The poetics surface through the use of anaphora—repetition of a word or phrase at the start of a line. Hamlet repeats the lines “to die, to sleep,” emphasizing the equation between death and sleep, while also using repetition in a lullaby-like fashion through the songlike refrain. He proceeds to say:

“For in that sleep of death what dreams may come / When we have shuffled off this mortal coil, / Must give us pause: there’s the respect / That makes calamity of so long life.”

For the agonizing  Prince, life (“this mortal coil”) is equated to “calamity” while death is equated to dreaming. But this portion is not merely repetition of his previous aspiration for relief through death. He is beginning to hypothesize why people continue to live in spite of such agonies. In this section, he conjectures that people might continue to suffer “so long”  because they don’t know “what dreams may come” on the other side of life. In other words, people might rather suffer than risk the unknown.

He continues to contemplate why people endure suffering:

”For who would bear the whips and scorns of time, / The oppressor’s wrong, the proud man’s contumely, / The pangs of despised love, the law’s delay, / The insolence of office and the spurns / That patient merit of the unworthy takes, / When he himself might his quietus make / With a bare bodkin?”

He wonders how people can “bear” myriad injustices, ranging from the more general “whips and scorns of time” to oppressive acts to difficulty in love to the inaction of the law, and so on. Note again how the most personal matters (“the pangs of despised love”) enmesh with broader structural failings (such as “the law’s delay”). Hamlet sees pain and injustice at every scale—the personal, the political, the individual, and the societal. Hamlet views himself as the victim of legal and personal corruption. Of course, the two are heightened and enmeshed; his father’s murder by his uncle lives at the intersection of both.

It is an open-ended question for the reader/audience as to whether Hamlet is accurately assessing his life’s misfortunes or if he is exaggeratedly framing himself as a victim. Is Hamlet totally at the mercy of unjust forces or does he have agency to change his fortune? Can Hamlet access agency from within grief and despair?

Following this litany of life’s woes, Hamlet shifts from the desire to escape suffering to the fear of the unknown. He asks:

“who would fardels bear, / To grunt and sweat under a weary life, / But that the dread of something after death, / The undiscover’d country from whose bourn / No traveller returns, puzzles the will / And makes us rather bear those ills we have / Than fly to others that we know not of?” He essentially argues the no one would grunt through such burdens (“fardels”) if it were not for a fear of what happens after one dies. Death, while an unknown, is a final place from which “no traveller returns.”

The choice to live is framed as something that “puzzles the will,” derived from the pressures of “dread” at the uncertainty of what comes after. In some ways, he is arguing the choice to live arises from adherence to the age old maxim “better the devil you know than the devil you don’t.” This confounds typical narratives and philosophies around the will to live. Endurance of suffering is not framed as a valiant force of the will prevailing against larger forces. It is instead framed as submission to fear of the unknown. Even the word “fly” implies a sort of agency and freedom in death. The choice is not quite between life and death but between the known and the unknown.

Hamlet’s speech forces the listener to contend with existential questions by reversing typical narratives that yoke life to agency and death to passivity. Instead, he prods at the theory that to live is to be passive in the face of human fear of randomness and chance at the unknown of death. This does not mean that he is bluntly choosing death over life, but interrogating the terms of life and death from within a space of grief and betrayal. His grief and betrayal dismantles his trust in the justice of personal, political, and legal systems. This forces readers to ask whether he is expanding his personal misfortunes to a falsely universal level or if these experiences have opened his eyes to extant and entrenched corruption abound.

Following this string of rhetorical questions, he says: “Thus conscience does make cowards of us all; / And thus the native hue of resolution / Is sicklied o’er with the pale cast of thought, / And enterprises of great pith and moment / With this regard their currents turn awry, / And lose the name of action.” One could interpret the adage-like phrase “conscience does make cowards of us all” to mean that conscience’s fear of death turns all into cowards. However, another interpretation based on the previous rhetorical questions could expand to mean that it is rather the fear of the unknown that reduces everyone to cowards. By virtue of saying “all,” Hamlet includes himself in this category, thus revealing that he has chosen life. Nevertheless, he frames the choice of life as the cowardly choice.

The lack of virtue in his choice is underscored through the phrase “the native hue of resolution / is sicklied o’er with the pale cast of thought.” He depicts his resolution or thought process as sickly and pale. His thoughts render him weak. He loses “the name of action” and becomes swept up, indecisive, and ineffectual. Indeed, the form of the soliloquy mirrors its content. The soliloquy “To Be Or Not To Be” seems to frame the question increasingly inwards around Hamlet’s own desire to live or to die. He is solo and he is in many ways thinking mostly about his own decision to take his life or continue forth.

Yet the theme of life or death also extends toward his potential actions. Were he to kill Claudius, his uncle who he believes slaughtered his father, and Hamlet believes that life is cowardly suffering, then is it a gift to give death to his uncle? Even though it is fraught, Hamlet ultimately decides to continue to live and continue his plot to seek vengeance upon his uncle.

He then notices his conflictual love interest, “The fair Ophelia” approaching. This ends the soliloquy on the level of plot, because he is interrupted, and on the level of form, because he is no longer alone.

The speech forces us to question the idea of agency in life, within Hamlet’s perspective and beyond. Is it more cowardly to live or to die? Do we access agency more by living amidst suffering or by choosing death? This theme intersects with and diverges from what later would come to be termed Existentialism, a branch of philosophy associated most closely with 19th and 20th-century European thinkers. Existentialism typically contends with whether life itself has inherent meaning or is essentially random. Hamlet questions life’s value and significance, and ultimately assigns life neither meaning nor lack thereof but rather a position of passivity, struggle, and powerlessness. Hamlet views life as a known entity of struggle while it is death that contains randomness and chance.

Furthermore, by highlighting the way Hamlet uses metaphors of war to describe his internal turmoil and comingled grievances of the state and of the intimate, we can see how the speech is making an argument potentially about politics and individual power. If the state is corrupt, do individuals have the power to change that corruption? Or do individuals lack the power to do anything but suffer under endlessly corrupt systems? Would it be more willful to endure or to exit the system entirely? Hamlet’s role as a Prince collapses the personal and the political. He simply cannot separate his personal relationships (father-son, lovers, uncle-nephew, et cetera) from their political valences (king, prince, queen, et cetera).

Hamlet’s own ability to reason is thrown into question. In addition to his pretend madness, this speech thematizes how his utter grief and despair affect his ability to reason. The repetition of sleeping and dreaming connotes a relation between death and peacefulness, while also evoking the underlying surreality that penetrates waking life. Is Hamlet’s view of reality clear and rational? Or is his reality clouded by how the nightmarish circumstances have affected his ability to be reasonable? In this way, a central theme of the play/soliloquy is the struggle to determine what is truly real. What is reality, what is belief, what is madness, what is dream?

Hamlet’s soliloquy also makes us ask how we decipher fact from fiction, reality from performance. The play and this soliloquy in particular make use of the theatrical fictive frame. Hamlet has decided to act as if he has gone mad as part of his plan to exact revenge and extract information. Yet clearly his suicidal ideation makes us wonder if his grasp on reality has been actually shaken.

The central part of his plan involves staging a play that contains a similar murder plot as the one he believes Claudius commited against his father. Hamlet intends to observe Claudius’ reaction to determine his guilt. These elements of a ‘ play within a play ’ structure and the fictive character of Hamlet deciding to intentionally put in a ‘fake’ act within the already existing performance of an actor make us question what is reality and what is a performance. Is Hamlet’s character actually mad or is he acting mad?

To Be or Not to Be – Parting Thoughts

We, as readers, are put in the hot seat. In our analysis of Hamlet’s soliloquy “To Be Or Not To Be” we are reading the words for an actor pretending to play Hamlet pretending to go mad. Where do you, as a reader, stand? A rich exercise to go even deeper is to listen to several performances of the soliloquy after analyzing the text. This will allow you to see how different actors interpret “To Be Or Not To Be” through their performance!

Additional Resources

If you enjoyed this article, you may benefit from checking out other blogs in our High School Success section including:

  • 30 Literary Devices High School Students Should Know
  • 20 Rhetorical Devices High School Students Should Know
  • Robert Frost’s The Road Not Taken – Analysis and Meaning
  • Great Gatsby Themes & Analysis 
  • High School Success

An experienced instructor, editor, and writer, Rebecca earned a BA in English from Columbia University and is presently pursuing a PhD at the CUNY Graduate Center in English. Her writing has been featured on The Millions , poets.org , The Poetry Project Newsletter , Nightboat Books blog, and more, and she received the Academy of American Poets Poetry Prize and Arthur E. Ford Prize for her poetry collections. 

  • 2-Year Colleges
  • ADHD/LD/Autism/Executive Functioning
  • Application Strategies
  • Best Colleges by Major
  • Best Colleges by State
  • Big Picture
  • Career & Personality Assessment
  • College Essay
  • College Search/Knowledge
  • College Success
  • Costs & Financial Aid
  • Data Visualizations
  • Dental School Admissions
  • Extracurricular Activities
  • General Knowledge
  • Graduate School Admissions
  • High Schools
  • Homeschool Resources
  • Law School Admissions
  • Medical School Admissions
  • Navigating the Admissions Process
  • Online Learning
  • Outdoor Adventure
  • Private High School Spotlight
  • Research Programs
  • Summer Program Spotlight
  • Summer Programs
  • Teacher Tools
  • Test Prep Provider Spotlight

“Innovative and invaluable…use this book as your college lifeline.”

— Lynn O'Shaughnessy

Nationally Recognized College Expert

College Planning in Your Inbox

Join our information-packed monthly newsletter.

  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Penlighten

Analysis of Soliloquy ‘To Be or Not To Be’ in Hamlet

Hamlet's soul is weighed down by the moral dilemma of choosing between living and dying. He oscillates between being reckless and cautious with his conscience, the afterlife, and religion, to rationalize the thoughts in his mind in this epic soliloquy. This Penlighten article provides the analysis and meaning of 'To Be or Not To Be' in Hamlet.

Analysis of Soliloquy 'To Be or Not To Be' in Hamlet

Hamlet’s soul is weighed down by the moral dilemma of choosing between living and dying. He oscillates between being reckless and cautious with his conscience, the afterlife, and religion, to rationalize the thoughts in his mind in this epic soliloquy. This Penlighten article provides the analysis and meaning of ‘To Be or Not To Be’ in Hamlet.

While writing Hamlet, William Shakespeare is said to have been influenced by the philosophical moral essays of French essayist Michel de Montaigne. These essay’s inspired many passages in Hamlet including the famous soliloquy ‘To Be or Not To Be’.

A soliloquy is defined as ‘ The act or custom of displaying one’s innermost thoughts in solitude. ‘ Perhaps the most famous speech in English literature which is majorly governed by rationality and not frenetic emotion appears in William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, written in 1602. This widely interpreted and scholarly debated soliloquy appears in Hamlet’s Act III, scene i (58-90). Even though the character morally determines to choose life at the end, the whole speech is based on the subject of death.

The soliloquy is scripted in an iambic pentameter with a feminine ending, meaning every line has eleven syllables rather than ten, the last of which remains unaccented. This was a popular scripting style of Shakespeare, and he used it to similarly effect in Macbeth’s ‘Tomorrow’ speech.

Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer Whether it’s more upright to suffer

The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, The beleaguering’s of misfortune,

Or to take arms against a sea of troubles, Or to take up weapons against our troubles

And by opposing end them? To die: to sleep; And end them by agitating? To die: to sleep;

No more; and by a sleep to say we end That’s all; and in sleep to say that we end

The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks The emotional disturbance and the many tensions

That flesh is heir to, ’tis a consummation That we are subject to, it’s an accomplishment

Devoutly to be wish’d. To die, to sleep; To be essayed thirstily. To die, to sleep;

To sleep: perchance to dream: ay, there’s the rub; To sleep: maybe to dream: oh, there’s the catch;

For in that sleep of death what dreams may come For in death’s sleep who knows what kind of dreams might come

When we have shuffled off this mortal coil, after the haphazardness and ruckus of life left behind us,

Must give us pause: there’s the respect Must make us stop and think: there’s the thing

That makes calamity of so long life; That makes our troubles last so long;

For who would bear the whips and scorns of time, For who would endure the affronts that time brings,

The oppressor’s wrong, the proud man’s contumely, The injustice of the oppressor, the proud man’s arrogant rudeness,

The insolence of office and the spurns The pains of unrequited love, the delays of the law,

That patient merit of the unworthy takes, The contempt of our victors, and the rejections that happen to those who don’t merit them

When he himself might his quietus make When he himself might end it all

With a bare bodkin? who would fardels bear, With a bare blade? Who would bear burdens

To grunt and sweat under a weary life, To grunt and sweat under a tedious life,

But that the dread of something after death, But that the dread of something after death,

The undiscover’d country from whose bourn The unknown region from which

No traveller returns, puzzles the will No traveler returns, confuses the mind

And makes us rather bear those ills we have And makes us prefer to endure the troubles we have

Than fly to others that we know not of? Rather than fly to new, vague troubles?

Thus conscience does make cowards of us all; In this way, thinking makes cowards of us all;

And thus the native hue of resolution And thus the natural color of decision-making

Is sicklied o’er with the pale cast of thought, Becomes sickly with the pale color of thought,

And enterprises of great pith and moment And endeavors of great might and grandness

With this regard their currents turn awry, At this point are derailed,

And lose the name of action.-Soft you now! And become inactive. Hearken now!

The fair Ophelia! Nymph, in thy orisons The lovely Ophelia! Girl, in your prayers

Hamlet is an anguished mortal, he keeps getting apparitions of his dead father who bequeaths his son to avenge his death. The kingdom of Denmark is now under the reign of Claudius―his father’s murderer and the newly-wedded husband of his widowed mother. Hamlet’s behavior has turned erratic over the sudden turn of events in his family, so much so that he scorns his beloved Ophelia. He is torn between the responsibilities and the need to get affection from the people he loves, but at the same time, a deep anger seethes inside him to take revenge. His actions are misjudged and termed as crazy, but it’s all the outcome of buried grief and depression. As fate intervenes, Hamlet gets the chance to play out his revenge without feeling the guilt or remorseful obligation for his mortal life.

The above soliloquy classically depicts the eternal struggle between choosing life or death, Shakespeare scripts this epic speech as an afterthought about his own reflections on the existence of death and afterlife. He enumerates some of the negative aspects of human existence in this soliloquy, we have all personally experienced “the proud man’s revilement,” “the stabs of scorned love,” and “the impudence of office”.

In the first playact, Hamlet anathematizes God for making suicide an immoral alternative. He states, “that this too solid flesh would melt, / Thaw, and resolve itself into a dew! / Or that the Everlasting had not fix’d / His canon ‘gainst self-slaughter! O God! God!” (I.ii.129-132). With this, it is clear that Hamlet is debating over the gains versus the losses of ending his own life, but also rationalizes that suicide is a crime in God’s and the Church’s eyes, and this could thus make his afterlife more forged than his present state of affairs. When Hamlet expresses the ailed question, “To be, or not to be: that is the question: / Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer / The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune / Or to take arms against a sea of troubles” (III.i.59-61), there is trivial uncertainty that he is supposing of death, he is still left without an answer of whether the “catapults and arrows of horrid fate” can be tolerated since life after death is so uncertain.

He questions the macrocosm of his death and thinks for a moment that it may be like eternal rest, which first seems to be acceptable until he reflects on what will happen to him when he enters into deep sleep. Just when his “sleep” suffice begins to charm him, he stops short and marvels on, “To sleep: perchance to dream:-ay there’s the rub; / For in that sleep of death what dreams may come” (III.i.68-69). The “dreams” that he dreads are the ails that the afterlife might bring, and since there is no easement from his earthly agonies through death, he is pressured to question death once again.

After graveling this complicated issue and inquiring about the cause of the great sleep, he then goes on to list many woes men are prone to in the bumpy course of life, which pushes him towards death once again. Hamlet poses the question for all depressed souls–is it nobler to exist miserably or to end one’s sorrows in a single stroke? He acknowledges that the response would be doubtlessly yes if death were like a dreamless slumber.

By the conclusion of this soliloquy, however, he finally understands, “But that dread of something after death, / The undiscover’d country, from whose bourn / No traveler returns-puzzles the will / And makes us rather bear those ills we have” (III.i.81-84). Although many chose life over death because of the inability to know the afterlife, the speech remains a cryptic reflection about the nature and rationalistic reasons for death. Lastly, Hamlet emerging from his instant of intense personal contemplation, truly implores the gentle and guiltless Ophelia to intercede for him.

This soliloquy ponders on some interesting aspects of death, life, and afterlife. Hamlet chose to surrender his life in the hands of fate and obtained the revenge that he was thirsting for. If you wish to get inspired by similar deep-meaning soliloquies, then some more examples of soliloquy by William Shakespeare is worth a read!

Like it? Share it!

Get Updates Right to Your Inbox

Further insights.

Who Are The Most Romantic Literary Figures of All Time?

Privacy Overview

  • National Poetry Month
  • Materials for Teachers
  • Literary Seminars
  • American Poets Magazine

Main navigation

  • Academy of American Poets

User account menu

Poets.org

Find and share the perfect poems.

Page submenu block

  • literary seminars
  • materials for teachers
  • poetry near you

Hamlet, Act III, Scene I [To be, or not to be]

Add to anthology.

To be, or not to be: that is the question: Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, Or to take arms against a sea of troubles, And by opposing end them? To die: to sleep; No more; and by a sleep to say we end The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks That flesh is heir to, 'tis a consummation Devoutly to be wish'd. To die, to sleep; To sleep: perchance to dream: ay, there's the rub; For in that sleep of death what dreams may come When we have shuffled off this mortal coil, Must give us pause: there's the respect That makes calamity of so long life; For who would bear the whips and scorns of time, The oppressor's wrong, the proud man's contumely, The pangs of despised love, the law's delay, The insolence of office and the spurns That patient merit of the unworthy takes, When he himself might his quietus make With a bare bodkin? who would fardels bear, To grunt and sweat under a weary life, But that the dread of something after death, The undiscover'd country from whose bourn No traveller returns, puzzles the will And makes us rather bear those ills we have Than fly to others that we know not of? Thus conscience does make cowards of us all; And thus the native hue of resolution Is sicklied o'er with the pale cast of thought, And enterprises of great pith and moment With this regard their currents turn awry, And lose the name of action.—Soft you now! The fair Ophelia! Nymph, in thy orisons Be all my sins remember'd.

More by this poet

My mistress' eyes are nothing like the sun (sonnet 130).

My mistress' eyes are nothing like the sun; Coral is far more red than her lips' red; If snow be white, why then her breasts are dun; If hairs be wires, black wires grow on her head. I have seen roses damasked, red and white, But no such roses see I in her cheeks; And in some perfumes is there more delight

Julius Caesar, Act III, Scene I [O, pardon me, thou bleeding piece of earth]

Antony speaks over Caesar's body

The Merchant of Venice, Act IV, Scene I [The quality of mercy is not strained]

The quality of mercy is not strained; It droppeth as the gentle rain from heaven Upon the place beneath. It is twice blest; It blesseth him that gives and him that takes: 'T is mightiest in the mightiest; it becomes The throned monarch better than his crown: His sceptre shows the force of temporal power,

Hamlet, Act I, Scene I [Some say that ever 'gainst that season comes]

Marcellus to Horatio and Bernardo, after seeing the Ghost ,

Newsletter Sign Up

  • Academy of American Poets Newsletter
  • Academy of American Poets Educator Newsletter
  • Teach This Poem

Poems & Poets

September 2024

Speech: “To be, or not to be, that is the question”

(from Hamlet , spoken by Hamlet)

  • Search Menu

Sign in through your institution

  • Advance articles
  • Editor's Choice
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submission Site
  • Open Access
  • Why Publish?
  • About The Review of English Studies
  • Editorial Board
  • Advertising and Corporate Services
  • Journals Career Network
  • Self-Archiving Policy
  • Books for Review
  • Dispatch Dates
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Journals on Oxford Academic
  • Books on Oxford Academic

Issue Cover

  • < Previous

‘To be or not to be’: Hamlet’s Humanistic Quaestio

  • Article contents
  • Figures & tables
  • Supplementary Data

Vanessa Lim, ‘To be or not to be’: Hamlet’s Humanistic Quaestio , The Review of English Studies , Volume 70, Issue 296, September 2019, Pages 640–658, https://doi.org/10.1093/res/hgz005

  • Permissions Icon Permissions

Hamlet’s ‘To be or not to be’ speech has long been the subject of intense scholarly attention. By situating the speech against the backdrop of classical and Renaissance rhetorical theory, this essay demonstrates that there is still much more to be said about it. The speech ostensibly examines a quaestio infinita or a thesis , and follows the rhetorical rule that the right way to do so is by the invocation of commonplaces. This reading of Hamlet’s speech is not only consistent with Shakespeare’s characterization of the university-educated prince, who frequently invokes commonplaces, but also has significant implications for our understanding of the play and Shakespeare’s own practice as a writer. The book that Hamlet is reading could well be his own commonplace collection, and it is perhaps in looking up his entries under the heading of ‘Death’ that Hamlet finds what he needs in order to examine his quaestio .

Personal account

  • Sign in with email/username & password
  • Get email alerts
  • Save searches
  • Purchase content
  • Activate your purchase/trial code
  • Add your ORCID iD

Institutional access

Sign in with a library card.

  • Sign in with username/password
  • Recommend to your librarian
  • Institutional account management
  • Get help with access

Access to content on Oxford Academic is often provided through institutional subscriptions and purchases. If you are a member of an institution with an active account, you may be able to access content in one of the following ways:

IP based access

Typically, access is provided across an institutional network to a range of IP addresses. This authentication occurs automatically, and it is not possible to sign out of an IP authenticated account.

Choose this option to get remote access when outside your institution. Shibboleth/Open Athens technology is used to provide single sign-on between your institution’s website and Oxford Academic.

  • Click Sign in through your institution.
  • Select your institution from the list provided, which will take you to your institution's website to sign in.
  • When on the institution site, please use the credentials provided by your institution. Do not use an Oxford Academic personal account.
  • Following successful sign in, you will be returned to Oxford Academic.

If your institution is not listed or you cannot sign in to your institution’s website, please contact your librarian or administrator.

Enter your library card number to sign in. If you cannot sign in, please contact your librarian.

Society Members

Society member access to a journal is achieved in one of the following ways:

Sign in through society site

Many societies offer single sign-on between the society website and Oxford Academic. If you see ‘Sign in through society site’ in the sign in pane within a journal:

  • Click Sign in through society site.
  • When on the society site, please use the credentials provided by that society. Do not use an Oxford Academic personal account.

If you do not have a society account or have forgotten your username or password, please contact your society.

Sign in using a personal account

Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members. See below.

A personal account can be used to get email alerts, save searches, purchase content, and activate subscriptions.

Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members.

Viewing your signed in accounts

Click the account icon in the top right to:

  • View your signed in personal account and access account management features.
  • View the institutional accounts that are providing access.

Signed in but can't access content

Oxford Academic is home to a wide variety of products. The institutional subscription may not cover the content that you are trying to access. If you believe you should have access to that content, please contact your librarian.

For librarians and administrators, your personal account also provides access to institutional account management. Here you will find options to view and activate subscriptions, manage institutional settings and access options, access usage statistics, and more.

Short-term Access

To purchase short-term access, please sign in to your personal account above.

Don't already have a personal account? Register

Month: Total Views:
March 2019 84
April 2019 18
May 2019 11
June 2019 1
July 2019 2
August 2019 5
September 2019 47
October 2019 61
November 2019 36
December 2019 38
January 2020 15
February 2020 13
March 2020 9
April 2020 25
May 2020 9
June 2020 12
July 2020 3
August 2020 2
September 2020 7
October 2020 13
November 2020 26
December 2020 21
January 2021 10
February 2021 10
March 2021 9
April 2021 16
May 2021 15
June 2021 3
July 2021 6
August 2021 5
September 2021 10
October 2021 27
November 2021 20
December 2021 12
January 2022 8
February 2022 8
March 2022 5
April 2022 15
May 2022 1
June 2022 10
July 2022 2
August 2022 3
September 2022 16
October 2022 13
November 2022 24
December 2022 8
January 2023 7
February 2023 4
March 2023 10
April 2023 25
May 2023 12
June 2023 6
July 2023 7
August 2023 7
September 2023 11
October 2023 15
November 2023 16
December 2023 17
January 2024 2
February 2024 9
March 2024 25
April 2024 16
May 2024 6
June 2024 10
July 2024 6
August 2024 8
September 2024 12

Email alerts

Citing articles via.

  • Recommend to your Library

Affiliations

  • Online ISSN 1471-6968
  • Print ISSN 0034-6551
  • Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
  • About Oxford Academic
  • Publish journals with us
  • University press partners
  • What we publish
  • New features  
  • Open access
  • Rights and permissions
  • Accessibility
  • Advertising
  • Media enquiries
  • Oxford University Press
  • Oxford Languages
  • University of Oxford

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide

  • Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
  • Cookie settings
  • Cookie policy
  • Privacy policy
  • Legal notice

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

To be or not to be Essay

  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment

Branagh’s Hamlet is a version that sets the “to be or not to be” scene in a palace, in a room surrounded by mirrors (Eirion HyperApps, 2012). The choice of mirrors is a deliberate decision by the director to symbolize Hamlet’s internal conflict. He is contemplating suicide because his life has become difficult for him (Eirion HyperApps, 2012). The mirrors help Hamlet reflect on life and also see the advantages and disadvantages of whichever decision he would make.

Branagh uses the tone and gestures that make it possible for the audience to feel what he feels (Eirion HyperApps, 2012). He has to choose between life and death. He clenches and then raises his hand to threaten and express his anger in the way life is taking him. As the actor and the camera approach the mirror, his image also gets closer to it.

This brings out his emotions, which would be invisible in the real world. It is symbolic in the sense that dreams might come true. When Branagh jerks out his knife and directs it towards the reflection, it emerges that the desire to live overshadows that of dying (Eirion HyperApps, 2012).. He only taps the dagger at the mirror rather than using it on himself.

Laurence Olivier’s production of Hamlet presents this soliloquy in a different way. This scene displays Hamlet sitting on a cliff staring at the sea (Karldallas, 2010). He is in deep thoughts. This can be clearly seen on his face and in his voice. Initially, Hamlet seems to have totally made up his mind. He speaks in a pessimistic tone, and his facial expressions agree with his words. From the beginning to when he says ”To die: to sleep; to sleep,” we believe that he will die.

At the peak of his disillusionment, he pulls out a dagger to commit suicide, but realizes that his death will not help to solve his problems (Karldallas, 2010). The man suddenly drops his ambition to kill himself and raises his voice while reciting the remaining part of the soliloquy.

The words and performances that follow carry a somehow optimistic tone. Hamlet’s attitude to life has changed. Now he seems livelier than before, which shows his renewed readiness to live (Karldallas, 2010). Hamlet looks at his dagger and disposes it into the sea. Then, he stands up and walks to the edge of the cliff, looks into the sea and walks away from this point. This performance, therefore, takes the audience through the whole process of attitude transformation within Hamlet.

Hawke’s version takes a different setting. In this version, Hamlet walks aimlessly in a library looking very depressed (MarceloCordioli, 2008). He looks at the books on the shelves as he walks back and forth, but seems not to notice them. His choice of setting is appropriate as it helps to bring out the picture of Hamlet’s mind. His lack of concentration on the books shows that he is in trouble. At some point, he even stands in one position not knowing what to do next.

The turning point is when he sees a man shooting another man in a movie (MarceloCordioli, 2008). This makes him wake up from his “sleep”. Before this point, Hamlet thinks without speaking, which shows the audience that he is too depressed. Shortly after the movie incident, the man speaks out his thoughts loudly, thus, showing a transformed attitude to life (MarceloCordioli, 2008).

The performance I like most is the one presented by Olivier. The director chooses a very befitting setting. He puts Hamlet on top of a cliff near the sea (MarceloCordioli, 2008). He speaks in a resigned tone and his facial expression changes with the direction of his thoughts. Hamlet looks very depressed at the beginning, but becomes somehow lively when he makes up his mind to live.

This version brings out Shakespeare’s original idea better than the other two. The author wanted to bring out a very depressed Hamlet; a Hamlet who lost a father and intends to kill the person who murdered his father, and married his mother. He even ends up killing the wrong person in the process.

Olivier captures this state of mind by his choice of setting (a cliff near the sea), and Hamlet’s actions when he point a dagger at himself, throws it into the sea and walks away after deciding to spare his life (MarceloCordioli, 2008). The actor’s facial expressions are also appropriate in showing his state of mind.

The other two performances do not express Shakespeare’s ideas fully. The setting Branagh chooses is not the best as he uses too much symbolism, especially the mirrors. The palace he depicts also does not make this version bring out a vivid picture of somebody who wants to commit suicide. The palace would have done better in the scenes involving happy moments than melancholic ones.

Hawke’s version, on the other hand, only concentrates on movements, tone and facial expressions, but not on actions. It portrays Hamlet as a person in deep thought, who would not want to commit suicide or kill somebody. The use of actions would have complemented the facial expressions, movements and tone. The result would have enabled the audience to envision what Shakespeare wanted them to see.

Eirion HyperApps. (2012). Hamlet, To be or not to be-Kenneth Branagh . [Video file]. Web.

Karldallas. (2010). Olivier’s Hamlet Film. To be or not to be . [Video file]. Web.

MarceloCordioli. (2008 ). Hamlet-To be or not to be . [Video file]. Web.

  • Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
  • Modern Theatre and Film Industry
  • Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein" (1994)
  • Indeterminate Sentencing: To Be or Not to Be?
  • To Be or not to Be: Is Shakespeare Great Enough to Top the Canon?
  • The Play "Fifth of July" by Lanford Wilson
  • An Analysis of Almost Maine
  • Edward Albee, His Life and Works
  • The Tragedy of Othello: Critical Analysis — Othello Critical Essay
  • Why Was the Globe Theatre Important to Shakespeare?
  • Chicago (A-D)
  • Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2019, January 17). To be or not to be. https://ivypanda.com/essays/to-be-or-not-to-be/

"To be or not to be." IvyPanda , 17 Jan. 2019, ivypanda.com/essays/to-be-or-not-to-be/.

IvyPanda . (2019) 'To be or not to be'. 17 January.

IvyPanda . 2019. "To be or not to be." January 17, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/to-be-or-not-to-be/.

1. IvyPanda . "To be or not to be." January 17, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/to-be-or-not-to-be/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "To be or not to be." January 17, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/to-be-or-not-to-be/.

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy .

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy .

Home — Essay Samples — Life — Life Lesson — Understanding the Concept of “To Be Or not to Be”

test_template

Understanding The Concept of "To Be Or not to Be"

  • Categories: Hamlet Life Lesson To Be Or Not to Be

About this sample

close

Words: 1097 |

Published: Jun 10, 2020

Words: 1097 | Pages: 2 | 6 min read

Image of Dr. Oliver Johnson

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Let us write you an essay from scratch

  • 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
  • Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

author

Verified writer

  • Expert in: Literature Life

writer

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

1 pages / 617 words

3 pages / 1418 words

5 pages / 2080 words

2 pages / 990 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Life Lesson

Failure is an inevitable part of life, but its impact goes far beyond setbacks and disappointments. This essay explores the valuable lessons we can take from failure, emphasizing the role it plays in personal growth, resilience, [...]

The thing you regret the most is a topic that invites introspection into the choices and experiences that have shaped our lives. Regret is a complex and universal emotion, often serving as a reminder of missed opportunities or [...]

Life passes down great experiences to all of us. Sometimes these experiences go much more than just a memory, they go into teachings. By living through these experiences, we gain a great amount of wisdom. Fortunately I was [...]

Life is an intricate tapestry of experiences, each thread weaving a unique lesson into the fabric of our existence. In this essay on a life lesson, I will share a personal experience that profoundly impacted my life. I will [...]

Failure is often viewed as a setback, a detour from the path of success. However, history is replete with examples of individuals who have not only rebounded from failure but have also harnessed its valuable lessons to achieve [...]

The teenage years are undoubtedly a transformative period filled with numerous life-changing lessons. As adolescents navigate their way through the complexities of adolescence, they encounter challenges, triumphs, and [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

  • Instructions Followed To The Letter
  • Deadlines Met At Every Stage
  • Unique And Plagiarism Free

to be or not to be essay

Home > Blog > How To Start An Essay

How To Start An Essay

How To Start An Essay

  • Smodin Editorial Team
  • Updated: September 24, 2024
  • Step-by-Step Instructions for Writing

The most difficult aspect of composing an academic essay is writing the introduction. Creating an introduction that engages is crucial. It’s supposed to capture the reader’s interest and introduce the main ideas of the entire essay. However, this can be a challenging task.

A lot of students get stuck in the introduction part of their essays. But, there is light at the end of the tunnel. You don’t have to dedicate endless hours to perfecting your introductory paragraphs!

Begin writing without going into too much detail or making things complicated; just get started! In our article, we go through various tips on how to start an essay, take a deep dive into different types of essays , and give you various essay introduction examples. Keep reading if you want to write an essay introduction in no time!

A person writing some notes and surrounded by a notebook and a coffee mug.

What Makes a Good Academic Essay Introduction?

An effective essay introduction paragraph is supposed to get the reader psyched about your work and there are plenty of ways you can choose to do this. There’s no formula for writing a strong introduction in our academic essays.

You could start with a fact or a quote. Or, you could choose to state the main point of your essay. Whatever you decide, you need to make sure it relates to your essay topic. You wouldn’t begin by quoting Einstein for a Geography essay!

How To Write an Essay Introduction

If you’re wondering how to write an essay introduction that will engage your readers, then you should know that this depends on the type of content you’re writing. Informative essays don’t start the same as a thesis statement, for example. All academic writing has some requirements, however. Hence, when you write an introduction to your essay, you must:

  • Ensure it is an attention-grabber. Begin with a fascinating fact or question that gets the reader thinking.
  • Include background information. Give necessary context about the subject and its importance.
  • Add a strong thesis statement. Clearly state what you plan to prove or argue in your essay; this sets up where everything else is headed.
  • Provide a roadmap. Summarize the structure of your essay with the main points listed briefly so that readers know what’s coming next.

A person typing on a laptop.

1. How To Start an Informative Essay

For informative essays, the focus should be proving that you know everything about your subject. You can do all of this with a good introduction. Early on, you can let the audience know what will be discussed so they want to learn more. Consider it as a way of preparing an audience for the rest of the essay.

Poor introduction: “Water is very important. This essay will talk about water resources and why they are important.”

Why is the above not how to start an informative essay? Because of the following:

  • It starts with a generic statement.
  • It doesn’t give background or information.

A good introduction, however, would look more like this:

“Over 70% of the Earth’s surface is covered by water. And yet, only 2.5% of it is fresh. This startling fact shows just how important water conservation is. In this essay, we will explore the current state of global water resources. We’ll also look at the challenges of water scarcity, and potential solutions to ensure sustainable water use.”

This is better because:

  • It starts with an interesting fact that draws the reader’s attention.
  • It helps to establish the context of the essay.
  • It adds some much-needed context on what is going to be discussed.

2. How To Start an Argumentative Essay

Wondering how to start an argumentative essay? Introductions to argumentative essays must set the points you’re going to make. Do this by providing the background information on the issues you’re discussing. This sets the stage for your later argument and prepares the reader for what they’re about to read.

Here is a good argumentative essay introduction example:

“Imagine a world where public healthcare is accessible to all. Regardless of income. Universal healthcare is a controversial topic. But, it is necessary for equality and public well-being. In this essay, I will argue that universal healthcare should be implemented in the United States. I will discuss its benefits and address some common counterarguments. This article will also examine successful models from other countries.”

This is good because:

  • It starts with a provocative statement.
  • There’s a setup for what’s coming next.

Bad introduction: “Universal healthcare is a big topic. This essay will discuss why it should be implemented.”

This doesn’t work. Here’s why:

  • It’s too short.
  • It doesn’t explain “why” universal healthcare is a “big topic.”
  • The introduction doesn’t set up the overall argument.

3. How To Start an Expository Essay

Academic writing has its do’s and don’ts , and expository essays, specifically, give you a bit more freedom when it comes to your introduction. This is because they present evidence without an argument, so you don’t need to present your main idea early on.

It’s still important to try to engage the reader with either interesting context or a surprising fact. An expository essay introduction should work in your favor by setting up the tone of the essay.

Here is a bad introduction example:

Bad introduction: “AI is a topic. This essay will talk about AI and what it does.”

You should not start your expository essay like this because:

  • It doesn’t provide context that sets up the necessary background information on the topic.
  • The introduction is far too generic. There are no hints on future discussions.

A good introduction example of how to start an expository essay is the following:

Good introduction: “Artificial intelligence (AI) is no longer a concept found in science fiction. It is now a reality. It impacts our daily lives in many ways. From virtual assistants to autonomous vehicles, AI technology is rapidly evolving. This essay will explore the history of AI and its current applications. It will also look at potential future developments.”

The above is a good introduction to an expository essay because of the following:

  • It includes specific details about the scope of AI.
  • It has a good hook.
  • It includes the key points that will be explored in the rest of the essay.

4. How To Start an Analysis Essay

Wan to learn how to start an analysis essay to compel your readers to want to know more? Analysis essay introductions should include an engaging hook . You could also choose to present a bit of background information about the text or subject that you’re analyzing.

Because you need to carry out a deep examination of a subject, writing a strong introduction is necessary. It prepares the reader for the new and exciting insights you’re about to provide.

Here’s a good introduction for an analysis essay about Shakespeare:

“Hamlet’s central theme is the human condition. It’s filled with complex characters and intricate themes. The character of Hamlet himself embodies the struggle between action and inaction. This is a central theme of the play. In this essay, I will analyze Hamlet’s soliloquies. The aim is to uncover how Shakespeare uses them to develop this theme and reveal Hamlet’s internal conflict.”

This is a good introduction because it:

  • Sets up the key themes of Hamlet
  • Explains what the essay will cover

Bad introduction: “Hamlet is a play by Shakespeare. This essay will analyze Hamlet and what he says.”

This is a poor opening statement because:

  • The introduction is far too short and doesn’t provide any context on Hamlet.

An image of lots of books open and laid out next to each other.

5. How To Write an Essay Starting With a Quote

Knowing how to write an essay starting with a quote can be a useful skill to have. Starting with an interesting quote within the first paragraph can pack a punch when done properly. Use the following techniques to create an engaging essay introduction:

  • Start with the quote itself, making sure it is relevant to your topic.
  • Explain the relevance of the quote to your essay’s topic.
  • Provide context for the topic you are discussing.
  • Clearly state your main argument or purpose.
  • Write an overview for the rest of your academic essay.

6. How To Start a Thesis Statement

A clear thesis statement is essential. It works by guiding the direction of your essay and informs the reader of your main argument. Creating a strong introduction with your thesis statement sets the tone for the rest of your academic essay.

Here’s how to make sure your thesis statement begins well:

  • Consider your stance or perspective on the topic. Think about what you want to discuss, explain, or analyze in your essay.
  • Narrow your focus. Think about your topic and choose an angle that you can cover within your essay.
  • Craft a declarative statement. This should clearly express your main argument or position on the topic. It needs to be both specific and focused.
  • Briefly outline why your argument matters. What is the significance of your thesis statement?
  • Review your thesis statement to ensure it is clear and concise. Be specific and make adjustments to clarify your argument.

7. How To Start a Literary Analysis

A literary analysis essay introduction needs to be systematic so that you’re showing readers how you’re exploring the work. Before you write your introduction, you need to choose a niche angle to explore. Then, provide the relevant background information and why you’ve chosen your theme.

Let’s look at a great example of a literary analysis introduction for the book “1984:”

“In George Orwell’s novel, “1984,” the pervasive theme of totalitarianism is central to understanding dystopian societies. Using the character of Winston Smith, Orwell explores the dangers of a government’s control over its citizens’ thoughts. This essay will analyze how Orwell uses symbolism to portray the oppressive regime in “1984” and its impact on freedom.”

This works because:

  • It provides a concise summary of the key themes that are going to be explored.
  • It discusses key elements from the book to add much-needed context.

Can Smodin AI assist me in creating an essay introduction?

Smodin AI can help you create an essay introduction that will captivate your readers. Whether you need a strong opening line or a clear thesis statement, it can do it all! To get help, simply input your essay topic and the type of introduction you want. Smodin will then write it for you!

How can I make my essay introduction effective?

To make your essay introduction effective, begin with something that catches the reader’s attention. This could be a fact or quote. Provide context by giving necessary background information about the subject matter. State clearly what exactly you’re going to prove or argue throughout the essay in one sentence.

Make sure to let the reader know briefly about the main points and what you will be discussing. This sets up the reader’s expectations from when your essay begins.

What is the ideal length of an essay introduction?

Make sure your essay introduction is neither too short nor too long but straightforward. Normally, it should be around 10-15% of the whole word count limit given for your assignment. So, if your entire essay should be 1000 words, then aim to write between 100-150 words for your introduction.

This ensures that everything necessary gets included without overloading the reader with information that might discourage them from continuing reading.

Excel in Your Essays With Smodin AI

Ready to revolutionize your writing experience? Download Smodin AI today and discover the power of effortless, high-quality writing at your fingertips. With AI-powered research tools, you can enjoy instant feedback. You can also get automated referencing in MLA and APA formats. Think of Smodin AI as your ultimate writing companion.

Whether you’re tackling how to start an essay or ways to write reports and creative projects, get Smodin AI and write with confidence. Say goodbye to writer’s block and hello to productivity. Smodin AI—your key to unlocking 10x faster, plagiarism-free writing.

  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on Email
  • Subscribe to our Newsletter

YourTango

Harvard Grad Shares The College Essay About McDonalds That Got Him Into Almost Every University He Applied To

"keep in mind that the admissions officer is some dude lying on a couch reading your essay at 10 pm.".

  • Megan Quinn

Written on Sep 23, 2024

Harvard grad smiling while working on laptop

As high school seniors prepare their college essays, they are often pressured to compose a story about their monumental, life-altering experiences — the more dramatic, the better!

However, the reality is that you don’t have to climb Everest to write an effective essay.

One man proved this with his brief college essay about studying in a local McDonald's, which he credits getting him into nearly every institution he applied to, including Harvard.

A Harvard graduate shared the genius McDonald’s essay that got him into nearly every college he applied to.

Jeffrey Wang , a Harvard alum who graduated as Valedictorian from his high school class in 2015, is assuring modern-day high schoolers that they do not have to craft a masterpiece about how they wrote a symphony while balancing a full course load of honors classes in order to get into college.

student writing an essay

RELATED: High-Performing Student Accepted To Duke & USC Reveals Why She Turned Both Down To Go To A State University

He should know — his entire essay was centered around a local McDonald’s restaurant he studied at throughout high school. However, it had quite an unexpected takeaway and humanized him beyond the average applicant attempting to impress recruiters.

Wang shared a screenshot of his essay on X (formerly known as Twitter), and it has since been viewed over 2 million times.

“Some people study best at the library. Others occupy a corner in a coffee shop where inspiration and creativity flow with a cappuccino. Personally, I do some of my best work while sipping a one dollar plus tax McIced Tea at a plastic table on which my laptop and a book rest,” his essay began.

I got into Harvard + almost every college I applied to w/ an essay about studying at McDonalds. Had multiple admissions officers write me handwritten letters complimenting me on it To any frantic high school senior, the best advice I got was - keep in mind that the admissions… pic.twitter.com/94sKmcQGSD — Jeffrey Wang (@wangzjeff) August 8, 2024

“The subtle scent of grease fills my nose, and the shouting of order numbers rings in my ears. I’ve found an unconventional place of contentment beneath the Golden Arches.”  Wang goes on to tell a story about one summer night when he stumbled across his local McDonald’s restaurant and decided to order a meal and sit down for a bit.

As he was eating, he found serenity in all of the hustle and bustle, the aroma of hamburgers and fries, and the sound of children begging their parents for a McFlurry .

“I realize that there is nothing on my mind but my surroundings and my stomach. I’m completely at ease; no pretension exists in this global franchise that has more stores in the world than people in my town,” he wrote. 

After finishing up his meal, Wang went to his car, retrieved his books, and went back inside to study at the same table. It was hours later, when he lifted his head up from his books, that he realized it was the most productive he’d been in months.

Since that summer night, Wang made the McDonald's his go-to study nook.

RELATED: Girl Accepted By Yale And Columbia Despite Only Having A 3.8 GPA Had One Thing On Her Application No One Else Did

While the Harvard grad recognized that McDonald's may not be the ideal place for others to get their work done, he claimed that it was the perfect place for him.

“While attention-catching sights and sounds sometimes divert my attention, they’ve helped me to work by forcing me to focus harder,” Wang wrote.

“Better yet, I’ve found meaningful the array of diversions I’ve experienced, from a conversation with my quirky, retired seventh-grade English teacher about how fast (not quick, he had taught me) life passes by, to companionship with employees here like Milly, who works the cash register, and Maureen, the manager.”

For Wang, McDonald’s became a crucial place for him to escape and study — and it certainly helped that he had some delicious options from the dollar menu!

“For this, McDonald’s speaks to me,” he wrote. “Sometimes, I put my pencil down or stop typing into a Google Doc just to appreciate the simple utility of the location in a sort of wistful way. I see my life as a sort of quest to find ultimate authenticities, and while I know that there will be more truths to discover and that they will most certainly be more difficult to find, my being content at McDonald’s is one conclusive victory.” 

mcdonalds food

RELATED: College Expert Replies To Kids Who Say Universities With High Acceptance Rates Are For ‘Dumb’ Students

The takeaway from the Harvard graduate's essay was simply that contentment can be found in the most unexpected places — like a McDonalds restaurant.

Wang concluded his essay by declaring that in the chaos of everyday life, many people have difficulty focusing and being content exactly where they are. 

“I’ve learned that contentment can exist in imperfect and unforeseen places when you simply observe your surroundings, adapt, and maybe even eat a french fry,” he wrote.

Wang claimed that some college admissions officers took the time to write him personal handwritten letters praising him for his work and sharing how much they enjoyed it.

He also had a message to high school seniors stressing out about composing a masterpiece essay.

“To any frantic high school senior, the best advice I got was — keep in mind that the admissions officer is some dude lying on a couch reading your essay at 10 p.m.,” he revealed.

“Make sure that this person is entertained and thinks that you're an authentic human being.” 

Teenagers should focus on the profound beauty of ordinary life when composing college entrance essays.

Most 16 or 17-year-olds have never experienced anything earth-shattering, and that's OK. 

Wang illustrated beautifully that college essays do not have to be extraordinary tales to make an impact. They can be as simple as how your morning cup of coffee is your favorite part of the day.

“The truth is that most of us don’t live in a superhero movie where one event just changes the course of our lives,” Pratik Vengal , who offers advice to incoming college students, said in a video. 

Vangal explained, “The most common fallacy that I see online is that you need to have experienced some major disturbance, or grief to write a good college essay, and that’s simply not true.”

“The most successful college essays that I’ve read take a small moment, something even as modest as waiting at the bus stop in the morning, and transform it into an essay that truly shows colleges who you are. Your goal is not to prove your intelligence, they know you’re smart! Colleges want to hear an authentic and genuine story written in your voice.”

When you think about it, college admissions officers have to read over endless paperwork from thousands of applicants. They are more than likely sick of having to read the same essays that deal with fabricated themes of teenagers saving an entire population or curing a mystery illness just to impress them.

They want to read something that is simple, to the point and depicts you as a human being and not an applicant number or a superhero.

As Wang, who is now the co-founder of his very own company, has proven to us, you do not have to have extraordinary experiences to receive extraordinary opportunities.

RELATED: How A High School Student At The Bottom Of His Class With A 2.1 GPA Wrote A ‘Cliche’ Essay About Bowling And Got Into Yale

Megan Quinn is a writer at YourTango who covers entertainment and news, self, love, and relationships. 

Our Newsletters

Get the best of YourTango delivered straight to your inbox — the biggest stories, actionable advice & horoscope predictions!

score card research

We serve the public by pursuing a growing economy and stable financial system that work for all of us.

  • Center for Indian Country Development
  • Opportunity & Inclusive Growth Institute

Monetary Policy

  • Banking Supervision
  • Financial Services
  • Community Development & Outreach
  • Board of Directors
  • Advisory Councils

Work With Us

  • Internships
  • Job Profiles
  • Speakers Bureau
  • Doing Business with the Minneapolis Fed

Overview & Mission

The ninth district, our history, diversity & inclusion, region & community.

We examine economic issues that deeply affect our communities.

  • Request a Speaker
  • Publications Archive
  • Agriculture & Farming
  • Community & Economic Development
  • Early Childhood Development
  • Employment & Labor Markets
  • Indian Country
  • K-12 Education
  • Manufacturing
  • Small Business
  • Regional Economic Indicators

Community Development & Engagement

The bakken oil patch.

We conduct world-class research to inform and inspire policymakers and the public.

Research Groups

Economic research.

  • Immigration
  • Macroeconomics
  • Minimum Wage
  • Technology & Innovation
  • Too Big To Fail
  • Trade & Globalization
  • Wages, Income, Wealth

Data & Reporting

  • Income Distributions and Dynamics in America
  • Minnesota Public Education Dashboard
  • Inflation Calculator
  • Recessions in Perspective
  • Market-based Probabilities

We provide the banking community with timely information and useful guidance.

  • Become a Member Bank
  • Discount Window & Payments System Risk
  • Appeals Procedures
  • Mergers & Acquisitions (Regulatory Applications)
  • Business Continuity
  • Paycheck Protection Program Liquidity Facility
  • Financial Studies & Community Banking
  • Market-Based Probabilities
  • Statistical & Structure Reports

Banking Topics

  • Credit & Financial Markets
  • Borrowing & Lending
  • Too Big to Fail

For Consumers

Large bank stress test tool, banking in the ninth archive.

We explore policy topics that are important for advancing prosperity across our region.

Policy Topics

  • Labor Market Policies
  • Public Policy

Racism & the Economy

To have or not to have: understanding wealth inequality.

Institute Working Paper 98 | Published September 24, 2024

Default people image

Differences in household saving rates are a key driver of wealth inequality. But what determines these differences in saving rates and wealth accumulation? We provide a new answer to this longstanding question based on new empirical evidence and a new modeling framework. In the data, we decompose U.S. household wealth into its main portfolio components to document two new empirical facts. First, the variation in wealth by income is mainly driven by differences in participation in asset markets rather than by the amounts invested. Wealth differences are a matter of to have or not to have. Second, the large heterogeneity in asset market participation closely follows observed differences in access to asset markets. Combining these two facts, we develop a new model of life-cycle wealth accumulation in which income-dependent market access is the key driver of differences in asset market participation and saving rates by income. The calibrated model accurately captures the joint distribution of income and wealth. Eliminating heterogeneity in access to asset markets increases wealth accumulation in the bottom half of the income distribution by 32%. Facilitating access to employer-sponsored retirement accounts improves broad-based wealth accumulation in the U.S. economy. Historical data support the model’s prediction.

Sign up for news and events

More From Forbes

Why a good story is not the same as good leadership.

  • Share to Facebook
  • Share to Twitter
  • Share to Linkedin

We are hopelessly enamored with brash, bold, and unashamedly action-prone leaders.

Long before we had Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and their peers, there was Winston Churchill, who famously quipped “I never worry about ‘action’, only inaction,” or Ernest Shackleton, the much-celebrated British explorer whose spectacular but near-disastrous expedition aboard the Endurance is a staple of LinkedIn posts and business school case studies.

But should such leaders, past and present, really serve as our role models? Surely the antics of Shackleton, Musk, and the like are inspirational and, if nothing else, make for gripping reading. But are they the examples we should be profiling for aspiring leaders, the persons whose lives we should dissect in our quest for enduring leadership wisdom?

A look both to the past and to contemporary leadership research would suggest that the answer is an unequivocal “no.”

This is because those individuals, past and present, who generate a lot of noise and sensational activity are not necessarily the ones who had the greatest positive impact. Nor are they the ones who steered their teams and ventures to successful outcomes. In other words, boldness and action in the face of dramatic circumstances does not necessarily equal good leadership–yet we still privilege exactly these traits when selecting leaders.

There are many studies, from a diverse range of perspectives and disciplines, that make this point. Binghamton University Professor Neil MacLaren's research , for example, has demonstrated our penchant for seeing leadership potential in those who speak the most, regardless of what they say.

A recent meta-analysis by Professor Nurcan Ensari of the California School of Professional Psychology and colleagues found that "authoritarian and self-confident men" have a clear advantage in being perceived by others as effective leaders.

Google Play Store Warning—Do Not Install These Apps On Your Phone

Huge changes for student loan repayment begin in 5 days for 30 million borrowers, netflix’s best new movie has a near-perfect 97% critic score.

Where does our penchant for promoting such leaders come from? There is not one compelling answer to this question. But one potential explanation has to do with out penchant for stories (as I argue in my book The Unseen Leader ).

Since our days in the caves, we humans have had an abiding love for adventure stories , especially the so-called hero’s journey (think Harry Potter, Luke Skywalker or Jesus), in which an individual is suddenly thrust into a crisis and, through a series of trials and a near-death experience, transforms him or herself and their legions of followers. When we look around for inspiring examples or to nominate someone for a tough job, we tend to zero in on those individuals who conform to our preferred hero narrative.

But, alas, a good story does not necessarily equate to good leadership. We’d be wise to keep this in mind the next time we’re in a position to judge, reward or promote a leader.

Martin Gutmann

  • Editorial Standards
  • Forbes Accolades

Join The Conversation

One Community. Many Voices. Create a free account to share your thoughts. 

Forbes Community Guidelines

Our community is about connecting people through open and thoughtful conversations. We want our readers to share their views and exchange ideas and facts in a safe space.

In order to do so, please follow the posting rules in our site's  Terms of Service.   We've summarized some of those key rules below. Simply put, keep it civil.

Your post will be rejected if we notice that it seems to contain:

  • False or intentionally out-of-context or misleading information
  • Insults, profanity, incoherent, obscene or inflammatory language or threats of any kind
  • Attacks on the identity of other commenters or the article's author
  • Content that otherwise violates our site's  terms.

User accounts will be blocked if we notice or believe that users are engaged in:

  • Continuous attempts to re-post comments that have been previously moderated/rejected
  • Racist, sexist, homophobic or other discriminatory comments
  • Attempts or tactics that put the site security at risk
  • Actions that otherwise violate our site's  terms.

So, how can you be a power user?

  • Stay on topic and share your insights
  • Feel free to be clear and thoughtful to get your point across
  • ‘Like’ or ‘Dislike’ to show your point of view.
  • Protect your community.
  • Use the report tool to alert us when someone breaks the rules.

Thanks for reading our community guidelines. Please read the full list of posting rules found in our site's  Terms of Service.

Steals & Deals: Up to 79% off a massage pillow, skin care, bedding, more

  • Share this —

Health & Wellness

  • Watch Full Episodes
  • Read With Jenna
  • Inspirational
  • Relationships
  • TODAY Table
  • Newsletters
  • Start TODAY
  • Shop TODAY Awards
  • Citi Concert Series
  • Listen All Day

Follow today

More Brands

  • On The Show
  • TODAY Plaza

My childhood with Tourette syndrome — and the 1 friend who helped me through it

Tourettes

“Quelle étrange petite fille!” said an agitated woman in the grocery store.

When my 8-year-old self asked my mother what the woman had said, Mom didn’t reply, even though she knew some Cajun French, which was often spoken in the part of southern Louisiana where I grew up.

Now I know the answer: What a peculiar little girl.       

Studies estimate that 1 in 162 children have Tourette syndrome, though many children go undiagnosed, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports. In 19 out of 20 cases, the neurological disorder is genetic, according to Johns Hopkins Medicine .

Tourettes

Those numbers take on true meaning when you are one of the numbers. I am one of the numbers. My father is one of the numbers. My grandmother — one of those numbers — was humiliated by her incessant knee slapping and the dogged bullying of her classmates to the point that she dropped out of school in the eighth grade. 

If my family and I weren’t personally affected by the Tourette’s statistics, I may have never given much thought to Tourette’s or acquired any real awareness about what those with Tourette’s endure. I doubt I’d even know what Tourette’s really is, because it’s scarcely spoken of, outside of outlandish, mean joking.

Tourette’s isn’t what a lot of people think it is. It isn’t necessarily making dramatic movements or shouting profanities or slapping oneself, though tics can certainly manifest in myriad ways. According to the CDC , “Tourette’s is a condition of the nervous system that causes people to make sudden and repeated twitches, movements or sounds, called ‘tics.’”

Far beyond its textbook definition, for me, Tourette’s was blinking uncontrollably. It was sitting on my hands in Mr. Faulk’s second grade class in an attempt to stop my unruly limbs from flying to my face, unwarranted. It was whispering or saying or shouting “Amen,” both in church on Sunday (to which the pastor would politely respond “Hallelujah!”) and in the middle of standardized testing. My tics erupted on my grandmother’s front porch swing, in the produce department, and at the popular girl’s birthday party her parents forced her to invite “the weird girl” to. My tics didn’t discriminate based on the time or place. My tics were unrelenting and life-altering. They were exacerbated by stress, so naturally, the more stressed about ticking I became in social settings, the more noticeable my tics were.

Like most of the children assailed by Tourette’s, I grew out of my tics. My grandmother grew out of hers. My father lives with his, now so innately part of him that our family endearingly views his tics — like jolting his shoulders or screaming “What!” in an otherwise placid restaurant — like loveable quirks instead of symptoms of a neurological disorder.

Although I haven’t exhibited obvious symptoms of Tourette’s in over 17 years, vivid memories of others’ responses to my having Tourette’s have stuck with me.

Let’s face it. The old adage “kids can be cruel” is true, and I experienced kids indeed being cruel in their teasing. My parents even opted to homeschool me because of the bullying.

Today, when I look back on my childhood from the safe distance of adulthood, rather than dwell on the pain Tourette’s caused — the cruelty — I instead gravitate toward reflecting on something completely converse: absolute kindness and a love so genuine and enveloping that it eclipsed the pain.  

Despite every shaming comment or joke or another child’s laughter at my expense, I knew there was one person I could count on — one peer who didn’t see what the others saw: my best friend, Tayler.

I met Tayler before I began ticking. One winter day in kindergarten, as I stood in line to get a popsicle at the Snack Shack on the edge of the school’s playground, I made the disheartening discovery that I only had one quarter when I needed two.

Maybe Tayler, the new girl who had just transferred to our school midway through the year, saw the disappointment on my face. Maybe even at 7 years old, she had an unnatural level of empathy and an aptitude for reading others’ emotions, because she stopped playing four square, walked over and said, “Do you need more quarters?”

“Just one,” I said.

When she pulled out a shiny Georgia state quarter, I accepted it. We talked until I ordered my popsicle, which we broke and shared. We were friends thereafter.

Most weekends, her grandmother would drop her off at my house, where she’d spend the night. We’d stay up playing board games, eating Pop-Tarts and giggling. We’d wake up in the morning to swim in a kiddie pool, slip-n-slide down the hill in my backyard, ride scooters, play hopscotch.

Tourettes

Even after my tics materialized and I left the traditional school setting, and I first heard a neurologist peg me with Tourette's syndrome, my weekends didn’t change. My friendship with Tayler didn’t change. We’d still stay up way too late, simply being girls together, growing and learning and laughing.

In public, she treated me the same as she did in private: like her best friend — one she loved and naturally stood up for.

When I attended one of her school functions, another girl asked me, “What’s wrong with you? Are you some kind of freak?”

Innately shy and then beaten down by Tourette’s, I was speechless, with tears forming. Tayler declared, “Don’t talk to her that way,” grabbed my arm, and stormed out of the gym with me in tow. We spent the rest of the free hour in the library together.

Another time, once we were out of earshot of one of the neighborhood kids who taunted me as we passed by on scooters, she said, “We can’t listen to kids like that.”

What stands out to me now is the “we.”

Somehow, an 8- and then 9-, 10-, and 11-year-old had the empathy to walk this difficult path with me, the wherewithal to speak up when I needed defending, and the wisdom beyond her years to see what I couldn’t: that we really shouldn’t listen to kids like that. It would be many years before I could see the reality of what Tayler gave me.

I wish I could write a beautiful ending, telling you, reader, that Tayler and I remained best friends forever. But regrettably, as often happens to best childhood friends, our paths eventually diverged — unraveling our relationship slowly, first with differing interests, then different schools, and finally, physical distance from a move. Eventually, all that remained of our once sister-like friendship were few-and-far-between phone calls. Then, at just 23 years old, Tayler died. I never told her what she’d done for me.

If I could talk to her now, I’d show her this essay and say, “You made my childhood brighter with your understanding, defense, acceptance and love.”

Should you know someone with Tourette’s, love someone with Tourette’s, or see someone in passing who has Tourette’s, remember this: All we need is your understanding, defense, acceptance and love.

Olivia Savoie is a family heirloom biographer based in Lafayette, Louisiana. She is currently writing a memoir about her profound relationships with some of her life story subjects. 

  • International
  • Education Jobs
  • Schools directory
  • Resources Education Jobs Schools directory News Search

GCSE/IGCSE English Language 9-1: ‘Young people are selfish.' Essay Sample Answer

GCSE/IGCSE English Language 9-1: ‘Young people are selfish.' Essay Sample Answer

Subject: English

Age range: 14-16

Resource type: Other

SweetSuccess's Shop

Last updated

25 September 2024

  • Share through email
  • Share through twitter
  • Share through linkedin
  • Share through facebook
  • Share through pinterest

to be or not to be essay

This digital file offers an insightful sample essay in response to the statement, “Young people are selfish. They should all be made to volunteer to help others.” The sample answer presents a balanced, thoughtful argument that challenges the assumption of youth selfishness, highlighting the importance of voluntary community service while addressing the complexities of adolescence.

In this essay, several key language techniques have been used to enhance the writing. The use of rhetorical questions engages the reader, making them think critically about the issue. Contrasting arguments are presented to add depth and balance to the discussion. Descriptive language paints a clear picture of real-world examples, and persuasive phrases invite the reader to consider alternative perspectives. Formal tone and accurate grammar ensure that the writing remains polished and exam-ready.

This sample is an essential tool for exam preparation, as it not only demonstrates how to structure a compelling essay but also provides clear examples of language techniques used effectively in an argumentative format. By studying this model, students will gain valuable insights into crafting high-quality responses that meet the exam criteria, making this digital file a must-have resource.

Click the download button to have the full file at your fingertips!

CONTAINS: 10 PAGES

Thanks a million for visiting Sweet Success Supplies! May your endeavors be as sweet as our deals!

Tes paid licence How can I reuse this?

Your rating is required to reflect your happiness.

It's good to leave some feedback.

Something went wrong, please try again later.

This resource hasn't been reviewed yet

To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have purchased this resource can review it

Report this resource to let us know if it violates our terms and conditions. Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch.

Not quite what you were looking for? Search by keyword to find the right resource:

  • Share full article

Advertisement

Supported by

Using Haitian Immigrants as a Campaign Issue

More from our inbox:.

  • Trump Blaming Jewish Voters if He Loses
  • Pagers in a War
  • An Alternative to Photographing Your Airport Tray

An old photo of a neighborhood with “Welcome to Springfield “written across it like a postcard.

To the Editor:

Re “ I’m Ohio’s Governor. Here’s the Truth About Springfield ,” by Mike DeWine (Opinion guest essay, Sept. 21):

It is nice that Governor DeWine has nice things to say about the Haitian immigrants who have moved to Springfield, Ohio. But by supporting the Trump-Vance ticket, Mr. DeWine is not putting his money where his mouth is and is essentially saying he would be just fine with four more years (or, God forbid, even more) of slanderous, violence-encouraging, hatred-building attacks against immigrants in his state and the rest of the country.

Governor DeWine, like all of us, has a choice. We can pretend that Donald Trump will magically become the exact opposite of who he has shown himself to be over nine years in politics and decades in the public eye, or we can do our part to ensure that he never comes near the White House again.

Wesley Joseph Union Vale, N.Y.

Mike DeWine is “saddened” by how Donald Trump and JD Vance are using Springfield, Ohio, in their campaign rhetoric. But he still supports them in the coming election.

Let’s do a simple thought experiment, and assume for a moment that Springfield is the new home of 20,000 immigrants legally allowed into the U.S. under the same law, but that they arrived from Poland or Albania. Does anyone believe that this would be something that Mr. Trump and Mr. Vance would be talking about?

The underlying reason that they are targeting these law-abiding, hard-working Haitians should be obvious to anyone, and disqualifying for anyone seeking these high offices. C’mon, Mike, you are so close to getting this right — just one more step.

Lawrence B. Peck Chicago

Re “ Trump Knows What He’s Doing in Springfield. So Does Vance ,” by Jamelle Bouie (column, Sept. 19):

What the Trump-Vance campaign is doing with its focus on Haitians in Springfield, Ohio, is exactly what the George H.W. Bush campaign did in 1988 with its relentless ads in the media about Willie Horton , a Black man furloughed from prison during Michael Dukakis’s time as governor of Massachusetts. Mr. Horton committed violent crimes when released, the blame for which could not fairly be placed at Mr. Dukakis’s doorstep.

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and  log into  your Times account, or  subscribe  for all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber?  Log in .

Want all of The Times?  Subscribe .

IMAGES

  1. Hamlet's Existential Quandary: To Be or Not To Be? Free Essay Example

    to be or not to be essay

  2. "Hamlet" by William Shakespeare: To Be or Not to Be

    to be or not to be essay

  3. Gay; To Be or Not To Be Essay Example

    to be or not to be essay

  4. William Shakespeare

    to be or not to be essay

  5. (PDF) To Be or Not to Be

    to be or not to be essay

  6. To be or not to be

    to be or not to be essay

VIDEO

  1. Supra car not essay 👿👿👿👿👿

  2. Boys life is not Essay in everywhere 😭😔

  3. Life not essay for everyone love❎ money ✅

  4. driver life not essay #viral #truck #shorts

  5. life is not essay for everyone #my

  6. army life not essay &#pubgmobile

COMMENTS

  1. Hamlet's 'To be, or not to be' Soliloquy

    To be, or not to be, that is the question: The first line of Hamlet's soliloquy, "To be, or nor to be" is one of the best-known quotes from all the Shakespearean works combined. In the play, "Hamlet" the tragic hero expresses this soliloquy to the audience in Act 3, Scene 1. As the plots reflect, Hamlet is facing an existential crisis ...

  2. To Be or Not to Be: Analyzing Hamlet's Soliloquy

    William Shakespeare's Hamlet is one of the most popular, well-known plays in the world. Its iconic "To be or not to be" soliloquy, spoken by the titular Hamlet in Scene 3, Act 1, has been analyzed for centuries and continues to intrigue scholars, students, and general readers alike. The soliloquy is essentially all about life and death: "To ...

  3. 'To Be Or Not To Be': Hamlet's Soliloquy With Analysis ️

    The in-depth version. The first six words of the soliloquy establish a balance. There is a direct opposition - to be, or not to be. Hamlet is thinking about life and death and pondering a state of being versus a state of not being - being alive and being dead. The balance continues with a consideration of the way one deals with life and death.

  4. To Be or Not To Be Essay (English 221) (pdf)

    live or die. Moreover, the repetition of "to be" emphasizes the weightiness of the decision, as Hamlet grapples with the significance of his own existence. "Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer / the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune / Or to take arms against a sea of troubles / And, by opposing, end them" (3.1.65-68). Here, Hamlet more clearly questions whether it's more noble to ...

  5. A Summary and Analysis of Shakespeare's 'To be or not to be' soliloquy

    Virtually everyone knows the line, 'To be, or not to be: that is the question'. Whether we hear Laurence Olivier reciting them, or erroneously picture some other great Shakespearean actor pronouncing these words while holding a skull (which actually belongs in the later gravedigger scene), 'To be or not to be' is one of the most famous six-line phrases from all of English literature.

  6. To be, or not to be

    Table of Contents Ask the Chatbot a Question Ask the Chatbot a Question To be, or not to be, opening line of a monologue spoken by the character Hamlet in Act III, scene 1, of William Shakespeare's revenge tragedy Hamlet (c. 1599-1601). Often referred to as a soliloquy, the speech technically does not meet that term's strictest definition—that is, a monologue delivered by an actor ...

  7. To be, or not to be

    Comparison of the "To be, or not to be" speech in the first three editions of Hamlet, showing the varying quality of the text in the Bad Quarto, the Good Quarto and the First Folio "To be, or not to be" is a speech given by Prince Hamlet in the so-called "nunnery scene" of William Shakespeare's play Hamlet (Act 3, Scene 1). The speech is named for the opening phrase, itself among the most ...

  8. To Be Or Not To Be: Hamlet's Soliloquy Summary and Analysis

    The soliloquy commences with Hamlet pondering the fundamental question of existence. The juxtaposition of "To be" and "not to be" sets the stage for a contemplative exploration of life and death. Hamlet grapples with the inherent struggles of human existence, questioning whether it is nobler to endure the hardships of life or to seek ...

  9. Hamlet Soliloquy To be or not to be with Commentary

    Hamlet's Soliloquy: To be, or not to be: that is the question (3.1) Unlike Hamlet's first two major soliloquies, his third and most famous speech seems to be governed by reason and not frenzied emotion. Unable to do little but wait for completion of his plan to "catch the conscience of the king", Hamlet sparks an internal philosophical debate ...

  10. Hamlet's Soliloquies: To be, or not to be

    Hamlet's Soliloquy: To be, or not to be: that is the question (3.1) Annotations To be, or not to be: that is the question: Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer ... of French essayist, Michael de Montaigne, translated by an acquaintance of Shakespeare named John Florio. Montagine's essays on moral philosophy might have shaped many passages ...

  11. To Be or Not to Be: Expert Analysis of Hamlet's Soliloquy for Teens

    Hamlet's Soliloquy - Meaning & Analysis. He begins with that well-known line: "To be, or not to be: that is the question.". Already the stakes are high. Hamlet is essentially asking whether to choose life or death, being or not being, endurance or suicide. He goes on to say "Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer / The slings and ...

  12. "Hamlet" by William Shakespeare: To Be or Not to Be Essay (Review)

    Hamlet is a tragic tale of revenge and justice which highlights the human tragic flaws that Shakespeare masterfully introduces into the plot through philosophical soliloquies, deeply symbolic imagery, and the use of tone and verse for portrayal. Get a custom essay on "Hamlet" by William Shakespeare: To Be or Not to Be. 186 writers online.

  13. Hamlet to Be or Not to Be Soliloquy Analysis Essay

    The "To Be or Not To Be" speech in the play, "Hamlet," portrays Hamlet as a very confused man. He is very unsure of himself and his thoughts often waver between two extremes due to his relatively strange personality. In the monologue, he contemplates whether or not he should continue or end his own life. He also considers seeking revenge for ...

  14. Analysis of Soliloquy 'To Be or Not To Be' in Hamlet

    This Penlighten article provides the analysis and meaning of 'To Be or Not To Be' in Hamlet. Hamlet's soul is weighed down by the moral dilemma of choosing between living and dying. He oscillates between being reckless and cautious with his conscience, the afterlife, and religion, to rationalize the thoughts in his mind in this epic soliloquy ...

  15. Hamlet, Act III, Scene I [To be, or not to be]

    To be, or not to be: that is the question: Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, Or to take arms against a sea of troubles, And by opposing end them? To die: to sleep; No more; and by a sleep to say we end The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks That flesh is heir to, 'tis a consummation Devoutly to be wish'd.

  16. Speech: "To be, or not to be, that is the question"

    To be, or not to be, that is the question: Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer. The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, Or to take arms against a sea of troubles. And by opposing end them. To die—to sleep, No more; and by a sleep to say we end. The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks. That flesh is heir to: 'tis a consummation.

  17. Why is the "To be or not to be" speech in Hamlet considered important

    Share Cite. "To be or not to be" is the most famous of all Shakespearean quotations, coming as a reflection on mortality and the meaning of life. Hamlet, in considering his own struggles and ...

  18. 'To be or not to be': Hamlet's Humanistic

    Abstract. Hamlet's 'To be or not to be' speech has long been the subject of intense scholarly attention. By situating the speech against the backdrop of classical and Renaissance rhetorical theory, this essay demonstrates that there is still much more to be said about it. The speech ostensibly examines a quaestio infinita or a thesis, and ...

  19. To be or not to be

    To be or not to be Essay. Branagh's Hamlet is a version that sets the "to be or not to be" scene in a palace, in a room surrounded by mirrors (Eirion HyperApps, 2012). The choice of mirrors is a deliberate decision by the director to symbolize Hamlet's internal conflict. He is contemplating suicide because his life has become difficult ...

  20. To Be Or not to Be: Inaction and Hesitation in Hamlet

    Categories: Hamlet To Be Or Not to Be William Shakespeare. Words: 938 | Pages: 2 | 5 min read. Published: Feb 8, 2022. While Hamlet waits for Ophelia to arrive at their predetermined meeting, the young price drones in on his dilemma, a lethal quandary that deeply fixates into the human condition. Perhaps Hamlet feels guilt from his shifting ...

  21. PDF "To be, or not to be": Shakespeare Against Philosophy

    Drama does not simply reflect life in Hamlet's Elsinore; it is also equipment for living. In short, "To be, or not to be" is a dramatisation of a soliloquy just as it is a dramatisation of phil-osophy. Shakespeare did not philosophise in Hamlet, or at least he did not philosophise sincerely.

  22. Essays on To Be Or not to Be

    Hamlet To Be Or Not to Be William Shakespeare. "To be, or not to be" is the opening phrase of a soliloquy given by Prince Hamlet in the so-called "nunnery scene" of William Shakespeare's play Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1. In the speech, Hamlet contemplates death and suicide, bemoaning the pain and unfairness of life but acknowledging that the ...

  23. Understanding The Concept of "To Be Or not to Be"

    This, though, is just one answer of many. In the end, "to be or not to be" is not a question that can be answered by one person, or even by three people, across three centuries. It is a question that everyone answers differently, and that everyone must answer themself at one point or another. To live or to die, and how to live in between ...

  24. How To Start An Essay

    An expository essay introduction should work in your favor by setting up the tone of the essay. Here is a bad introduction example: Bad introduction: "AI is a topic. This essay will talk about AI and what it does." You should not start your expository essay like this because:

  25. Harvard Grad Shares The College Essay About McDonalds That ...

    A Harvard graduate who got into nearly every university he applied to is sharing his college essay that centers around a McDonalds restaurant he used to study at during high school. The essay is ...

  26. To Have or Not to Have: Understanding Wealth Inequality

    Wealth differences are a matter of to have or not to have. Second, the large heterogeneity in asset market participation closely follows observed differences in access to asset markets. Combining these two facts, we develop a new model of life-cycle wealth accumulation in which income-dependent market access is the key driver of differences in ...

  27. Why A Good Story Is Not The Same As Good Leadership

    There are many studies, from a diverse range of perspectives and disciplines, that make this point. Binghamton University Professor Neil MacLaren's research, for example, has demonstrated our ...

  28. I Was Bullied Because of My Tourette's, But 1 Friend Helped Me

    Essay. My childhood with Tourette syndrome — and the 1 friend who helped me through it. The kindness of one child made all the difference. My childhood best friend, Tayler (left), and me, as ...

  29. GCSE/IGCSE English Language 9-1: 'Young people are selfish.' Essay

    This digital file offers an insightful sample essay in response to the statement, "Young people are selfish.They should all be made to volunteer to help others." The sample answer presents a balanced, thoughtful argument that challenges the assumption of youth selfishness, highlighting the importance of voluntary community service while addressing the complexities of adolescence.

  30. Opinion

    Re "I'm Ohio's Governor. Here's the Truth About Springfield," by Mike DeWine (Opinion guest essay, Sept. 21): It is nice that Governor DeWine has nice things to say about the Haitian ...