ib tok essay questions may 2024

EXPLAINED: May 2024 TOK Essay Prescribed Titles

What happened to this post? HackIB has been acquired by MyIBTutor . All content is now available on the MyIBTutor Blog with more exciting IB content to come! Click here to see it for yourself!

Looking for November 2024 Session TOK Essay titles? Click here.

TOK Essay Titles – May 2024 Examination Session

The titles for May 2024 are released! Here they are below:

Make sure to bookmark this page as I explain and provide examples for each of these titles in depth! UPDATE: Title 1, 2, 5 and 6 are now available. Stay tuned for more! For general guidance on how to write a good TOK essay, check out my TOK Essay advice collection .

Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history? Discuss with reference to the arts and history.

How can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization and generalization in the production of knowledge? Discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.

Nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them? Discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge.

Do we underestimate the challenges of taking knowledge out of its original context and transferring it to a different context? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

Do we need custodians of knowledge? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

Are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitably the strongest? Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge.

This title attempts to challenge students on the main school of thought that you learn over the TOK course. The gist of your TOK teaching on both of these AOKs probably boiled down to something like: everything is art and it’s just whatever the artist wants to create, while history is always biased because the winners always write all of history. However, this eliminates much of the nuance in each of these AOKs that are worth exploring. That’s what makes this prompt interesting.

Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts? I will be honest, I never thought we really ‘celebrated’ subjectivity. It just, was. Inherently, art is a subjective exercise – you can think about this point a little further. You will find some heated discussion on whether art is subjective or could it be objective on the internet and I won’t delve into that here, because it isn’t the point of this title. The key here is to focus on the EXTENT of subjectivity and is it to the detriment of the area of knowledge itself. Then, we have to consider, whose subjectivity are we talking about: is it the artist’s subjectivity, or the audience’s subjectivity. For example, the Mona Lisa wasn’t that well known when it was first painted. I’m sure the Da Vinci thought it was quite a nice piece, but it seems like we didn’t really celebrate his subjectivity. It wasn’t until a certain audience found it subjectively good, that we accepted it as one of the greatest pieces of art in the world! That is an example of how subjectivity is relevant in the dissemination of artistic knowledge. For a more modern example, what about your favourite YouTuber? Do they truly make what they want? NO! They are often beholden to sponsors, and you – the audience! What you want to see, is what they will make! So it is YOUR subjectivity that drives their decision to produce art, not necessarily purely their subjectivity. Subjectivity by definition is just a person’s opinions, emotions, thoughts. This connects well with the TOK concept of values. What VALUES and WHOSE values are determining what art is created (in a variety of contexts), how art is perceived, and how art changes in its reception over time? These are all good questions to ponder. For more unconventional examples about art, think about how museums choose what art to display, what constitutes good art for prizes like the Nobel Prize for Literature, or why some art is considered more expensive than others? Are there systematic ways to think about our subjectivity and how we apply it to art? Is it really overly celebrating subjectivity or simply a necessity to make sense of the abundance of artistic knowledge in a sea of information today?

History gets a bad rep in the TOK classroom. Students like to trash on History calling it biased and unreliable. In this prompt, I don’t want you to refute these claims, but just think about how they aren’t necessarily catastrophic as we might think. We aren’t denying that biases in history could be problematic. I would be suspicious too, if the only accounts of the Rohingya Genocide came from the Myanmar military. However, the word condemned in the title suggests that we might be too harsh on historians when they get things wrong. We should focus on how the historical method recovers itself from failures in biases from its sources. Yes, it might be biased, but is it better than no history? Furthermore, does subjectivity actually ADD value to the way we produce, and interpret historical knowledge? While I’m sure a completely objective, news story like report of what happened in 1886 would be a historian’s dream, that isn’t the case! No matter how objective we try to be, we colour the events we experience by our own opinions, feelings and emotions. But isn’t that history in itself? In an almost cliched way, history’s subjectivity tells us more about what happened in the past and their beliefs and values more than words could ever say.

In both the historical and artistic discussions, you should focus more on the methodologies of these AOKs and how they achieve their AOK’s purpose. Subjectivity manifests in different ways in these AOKs and their methodology reflects that. In the overt awareness of subjectivity in the Arts, its method to produce knowledge is characteristically defined by subjectivity. In History, the method is to identify the covert influences of subjectivity, then to produce the most truthful knowledge possible. You can see that the goals of these two are different, and hence they deal with subjectivity differently. Don’t fall in the trap of focusing your discussion too much on your examples, but generalise to the patterns of how subjectivity manifest in your AOKs and whether their treatment of it is problematic.

It is crucial, when writing the essay for this prompt, to clearly define in your introduction what specialisation and generalisation means. DO NOT use the dictionary definitions here – since this is a TOK Essay, you want to make a TOK version of specialisation and generalisation, in terms of how these two things differ in the production of knowledge. Clearly defining the two in this way will form a solid foundation for you to have a nuanced discussion on this process of reconciliation between the two. The prompt hints at the competing demands on knowledge of specialisation and generalisation – i.e. you might not be able to produce knowledge in the same way if you were aiming for specialisation versus generalisation. So, this provides a point of contrast for you to choose examples and frame your discussion. Remember, the idea of competing demands is an ASSUMPTION, not an argument posed by the question. You should focus on how your chosen examples demonstrate a way to balance the interests of both and reach a ‘middle-ground’ rather than arguing that specialisation or generalisation are compatible with each other. TLDR: Don’t challenge the assumption.

For the first AOK of Mathematics, you should have encountered many personal examples just from your study of IB Maths. Most of your learning has been on generalisation, and the application of such generalisations. For instance, you learn about Calculus, a general topic within Mathematics, and then apply it in various contexts. Mathematicians love generalisations – that Calculus you learned? Well, the definition of a derivative generalised for all functions could be summarised by the first principles of derivatives function that HL AA students learn. You would have less interaction with specialisation of Mathematical knowledge. In a broader sense, the specific components of mathematics, cannot be separated from the general. You can’t solve calculus problems without the fundamental theorem of calculus. However, you could argue that the fundamental theorem of calculus didn’t need calculus problems to exist. Thus, an interesting dilemma arises in Mathematics – the generalisation could be produced, without a particular need for specialisation, but specialisation often calls for generalisation to first exist.

Looking at the latest mathematics research, you will find that applied mathematics is most common. Rarely do you see people get excited by new discoveries of solutions to elliptical curves, but more do when you tell them a new mathematical model to improve our prediction of the weather. We may place greater value on specialisation of knowledge, because we could see its usefulness more immediately, but, the Area of Knowledge does not require such specialisation to produce knowledge. So, do we encourage people to produce knowledge with the goal of specialisation in mind, or do we tell them to produce whatever theoretical generalised mathematical knowledge they can? Look to how mathematics is applied to Quantitative Finance, Econometrics, and Actuarial Science. They specialise mathematical knowledge and provide for some of the most lucrative careers. Does that speak to our preference and demand for specialised knowledge? But then again, what of the interdependence between generalisation and specialisation? How do we balance the two and how does the methodologies of the AOK contribute to this balancing act?

For the second, complimentary AOK, you could have discussions with all of the AOKs. For the Sciences, you could present a similar argument about needing to have some general theories before you could specialise. The scientific method is essentially one big generalisation process – you take specific observations and you make inferences so that you can generalise about some natural process. However, the knowledge that produces need not be general, it can still be specific. If we take specialisation as the goal, then we could pose narrow hypotheses to test. If we take generalisation as the goal, then we might need multiple of these narrow hypotheses to form a full picture, testing each individual case. Thus, specialisation could lead to specialisation alone, but more often, generalisation is the result of many specialisations.

One last question you might want to consider and attempt to answer in your essay is, do you want to know something about everything or everything about something? The answer to that will depend on your AOK. While we want to know about everything on everything, that is simply not reality. So, what trade offs do we make in each AOK, and how does each AOK decide on what we need to know more on?

You might be able to appreciate how long it takes ideas to actually be implemented in reality by looking at the recent Nobel Prize winners for Economic Sciences. The winner of the 2017 prize was Richard H. Thaler, for his contributions to behavioural economics. He explored the impacts of limited rationality, social preferences and the lack of individual self-control on economic decision making on an individual and market level. He started these findings from the 1980s, but it is only recently, in the 2022 revision of the IB syllabus that Economics students learn about the field of Behavioural economics in any detail! So why is it so?

To some extent, it is hard to criticise things for moving slowly. After all, new discoveries like behavioural economics represents a fundamental paradigm shift towards the way research is conducted in the particular AOK. Often times, fresh ideas are left to “ferment” so that their truthfulness can be tested with time. Nothing is more embarrassing than going down a rabbit hole only to find that your assumptions turned out to be monumentally incorrect. Even if we are making a big shift in light of new ideas towards the way we produce knowledge, doing so takes time! For many years and still now, we rely on strong assumptions of rationality to make economic models function. While the psychology of such behaviours are well researched, applying them to an Economic setting may not be. That is to say, it is important to consider how these new ideas arise, and what effect it has on existing knowledge, and the way we produce future knowledge. New ideas is simply new knowledge, but with the added implication that it has some effect on the existing knowledge within an AOK. It could potentially change how we view current knowledge, or how we conduct research given a particular discovery.

In the AOK of the human sciences, which broadly follows the scientific method, you could drawn some inspiration from the philosopher Thomas Kuhn’s view of scientific progress. He argues that within a period of “normal science” where we make incremental progress under the assumption of an overarching model, but there comes a point where we notice accumulation of imperfections with such a model that leads to new paradigms – new ideas, that fundamentally change how we do science. Then we undergo a sort of scientific revolution, where there are debates and decisions made over what sort of model we need to follow, until everyone eventually accepts the new paradigm and returns to a normal science period so that continual small improvements are made to knowledge, until another paradigm shift happens again. While you are not expected to demonstrate such strong philosophy knowledge within the TOK Essay, it is helpful to consider how each AOK handles such ‘revolutions’. For instance, it is harder to irrefutably find falsities in human sciences given the difficulty in replicability and corroborative studies compared to natural sciences.

As for complimentary AOKs, any would suit here, as each AOK has a very different way to handle new ideas. Many factors influence the way new ideas is accepted. For this title, we need to take the assumption that their acceptance is slow, not argue with it. Instead, you should consider what factors influence this slowness, and how different AOKs have different factors in mind when deciding how to accept new ideas. This relates to the nature of the AOK (what is its purpose) and the methodology guiding knowledge production in them.

Have you ever said something that sounds very weird out of context? That might have just been something silly with no real consequences, but in the realm of knowledge, we need to be careful about the consequences of knowledge taken out of their original context. This article highlights how the context of medical treatment matters a lot! As you can imagine, something that works in one field, doesn’t always apply in a straightforward manner to another. This is why there are whole research teams dedicated to what we call “translational research”. That is, trying to “translate” what you get from something like a lab setting, into actual products, like life-saving medications.

The obvious links to AOKs here are the Natural and Human Sciences. For Natural Sciences, we often start off knowledge production in a lab setting, or in a controlled environment. However, the application of such knowledge is rarely as controlled! So an interesting point to consider is how natural scientists have to account for the fact that their findings won’t ever be used in as perfect a setting as their research. Sure, you might have developed bullet proof wood , but how is that going to work in practically when it comes to mass manufacturing it for the army or the police? This is one of the biggest challenges that natural scientists face. It’s not that we aren’t trying to produce exciting knowledge, but that the application of such knowledge in a practical and appreciable context is often very difficult. Something like the mRNA technology (which recently was awarded a Nobel) took a long time to be developed into actual vaccines. The question then is, do we underestimate this process? Often it depends on the goal of the scientist. If the knowledge producer set out with an idea to commercialise in mind, then they would often consider the practical implications of findings. However, people studying theoretical physics for example, would struggle to immediately find very accessible real life implications. That doesn’t mean the knowledge is worthless, but certainly, the challenges are there.

What about non-scientific disciplines? Recently, I went to an art exhibition that trend Van Gough’s paintings into a 3D digital display. There was a Banksy exhibition that took the original murals he painted on the street, into this museum environment. Does changing the context of how art work is shown, and the manipulation of artistic knowledge change its meaning? What is the goal of transforming art into a different context? There are many reasons. Sometimes, it is to create satire (have a look at the parodies of the Mona Lisa), bringing old art onto a new audience (like VR exhibitions of Da Vinci), or simply making it more accessible to people (by making art works digitally available). The producers of these adapted forms of knowledge take great care in considering how this impacts the meaning of the art in its changed form. When artwork is so subjective, the context of art is often required to understand the artist’s meaning and intention, to ‘interpret’ works accordingly. At the same time, as we know art is quite subjective, is a ‘correct interpretation’ always required? If we are to remain artistic purists, then many of the joys of art could be lost! Imagine if you were admonished for listening to Taylor Swift through Spotify on your AirPods because it isn’t the original uncompressed music file with all the details, and you aren’t listening to it on the exact set of thousand dollar speakers it was created with? It would be ludicrous to assume that artistic knowledge is always going to be disseminated in the same context. Thus, this must be a consideration of artists. Is this consideration more or less difficult for different types of art? How is this consideration different to science considering there is no ‘right’ answer to interpreting art?

When thinking about this title, we aren’t arguing whether it is difficult. I think we all agree it is. However, it is about whether we underestimate just how difficult it is! Center your focus on how each AOK’s methodology highlights the consideration of being able to change contexts, and whether that affects the interpretation of the knowledge in question.

The term ‘custodians of knowledge’ is not something TOK students have likely heard of before, but this concept is relatively simple to understand. If you think positively about it, it could be protectors of knowledge, people who preserve knowledge, keeping it for generations to come – for example, some people might consider the Indigenous Peoples’ in Australia to be custodians of their unique cultural knowledge and what they call dreamtime stories. In this way, they keep culture alive, even if most people nowadays speak English and don’t readily tell their history. However, thought about negatively, it could also mean “gatekeepers’ (pardon the Gen Z language) of knowledge. The idealogical “protection” of knowledge could also be seen as a way to prevent some forms of knowledge from becoming knowledge in the first place. Talk to any university academic, and they will tell you how many times their research papers have been rejected. That’s why there is a bias towards statistically significant results, while research that showed that nothing significant has happened doesn’t often get published. Thus, these two contrasts provide for interesting discussion, particularly when considering how each AOK has different forms of custodians of knowledge and how they “gatekeep” or “protect” knowledge in different ways.

Take the AOK of the arts as an example. The career of artists are laughed upon because it is so hard to “break in” to the fine world of art. Many artists aren’t acclaimed until they are long dead. Perhaps most famously, the Mona Lisa wasn’t very well known until several hundred years after it was made. Thus, artists are often at the mercy of custodians of artistic knowledge like art curators and critics, who decide what merits acknowledgement as knowledge. After all, knowledge is only knowledge when there is consensus it is. And if the big wigs in the art industry doesn’t think it’s worth a mention, your art, however brilliant it seems to you, would not reach the consensus required to be considered knowledge. Of course, there are debates on the necessity of custodians in such a subjective AOK. After all, there were many times I questioned how some “artworks” even made it into the modern art museum when it’s literally splashes of paint on a canvas. I digress. However, there is something to be said about maintaining some form of standard to art. We judge whether some art is good or bad, but not in a very rigorous way. Custodians of knowledge supposedly have a framework to make such judgement in a way which preserves the nature of the AOK, and the knowledge within it. Therefore, discussion about the necessity of the custodians should focus on how they contribute to the purpose of the AOK, and whether it is compatible with the nature and methodologies of the AOK.

To further illustrate what I mean, you could see that Natural Sciences might present a stronger argument to the necessity of such custodians. We implicitly “trust” science, for better or for worse, because we know that there is a level of credibility imbued by the scientific method. It is the custodians’ role to maintain the standard of adherence to the scientific method that keeps this credibility alive. This is why, when flat earthers argue that they can’t see the curvature of the earth from the horizon, that it doesn’t get published in a scientific journal as fact! This is why, when research emerges that denies the existence of climate change, custodians have a responsibility to retract such research . However, at the same time, it also places much pressure on producers of such knowledge to create something worthy in the eyes of custodians. You might have heard of the data manipulation scandal that forced Stanford’s president to resign. Thus, custodians do appear quite important in this AOK, when we value the truthfulness of knowledge so much, but that isn’t without its consequences.

I recommend picking two contrasting AOKs that value much different things when writing the essay. While comparison is not a requirement for the essay, it gives you a more nuanced understanding of the question and thus a more reflective piece. For instance, we have just demonstrated that art is relatively subjective, while the sciences are less so. Thus, this influences the role which custodians need to play in each AOK.

The framework to answering this title for many students will follow a similar structure: an example of when novel evidence was accepted and had groundbreaking impacts, and another example where such evidence was problematic and disputed. Repeat this for the second AOK you choose and you’ll have 4 contrasting examples. This is not the only way to approach this title, but is my personal preference considering the structure I suggest to most students that ensures firstly, you will pass the basic criteria of a TOK Essay, and secondly, you will have a strong foundation to succeed. However, since everyone will have a similar style and collection of examples, it is even more important for this title, that you tease out the meaning and the effect on each area of knowledge, and knowledge in general, that your examples represent.

To demonstrate what I mean, let’s focus on two natural sciences examples. First, consider the case of “Cold Fusion”, a theory that you could supposedly have nuclear fusion at room temperature, discovered and subsequently debunked in 1989. A contrasting example, could be recent Nobel Prize winner of Medicine and Physiology, for the research on mRNA vaccines. Immediately, it is obvious that one shows where recent evidence isn’t the strongest, while the latter shows that it could be. But the focus should be on are we TOO QUICK in assuming so, not whether we should or not. Well, what are the reactions and timelines for each example? While Cold Fusion was met with excitement from the general public for the potential it holds for energy production, I wouldn’t say we ‘assumed’ it to be strong. Looking at the news reports from that time, you can see that there was great anticipation about the discovery, leading to lots of sudden funding and interest to investigate it and replicate it. As for mRNA, that discovery took a long time! First the technology, and the getting it to not appear foreign to the human body was very tricky. Even after it was discovered, we waited quite a while, with many people’s first experience with mRNA to be their COVID 19 vaccine. What you need to draw from these two examples is the methodological similarities and differences which reflect the NATURE of Science, and thus, the purpose of science. You see in both how there is an emphasis on replication which corroborates or falsifies, and only after doing so for a long time do we accept it to be true, otherwise it is debunked. So yes, there are moments where Natural Sciences provides strong compelling evidence that ends up false, there are many hurdles with in the methodology of the Natural Science that prevents us from being TOO QUICK to assume it to be true.

For this prompt, it is too easy to fall into the debate of why something was true or why something was false and tricked the population. This is not the point of the essay. You should avoid talking about the specifics of your examples at length. You need to demonstrate how your examples reflect the wider methodologies of the Natural Sciences (and similarly, for your second AOK) that either encourages or discourages our assumptions that novel evidence is always best. As you can see from my examples above, I focused on how such assumption does not happen too quickly because there are many ways we verify scientific knowledge to be true. I don’t discuss the specifics of the actual science behind Cold Fusion or mRNA as that isn’t required. You are better off focusing on the methodologies behind the AOKs themselves and answering the question.

Some interesting complements to the Natural Science AOK could be History (particularly focusing on revisionism and how historical events could be interpreted differently over time), Mathematics (how could the methodologies differ and are there ‘mistakes’ in Maths), or even Human Sciences (replication is a bit more difficult with that!).

Share this:

20 responses to “explained: may 2024 tok essay prescribed titles”.

Hi, when will you deconstruct #6? Much appreciated.

I just did! Hope it helps.

Thank you so much!

hello! when will you deconstruct #2? would really really appreciate it !!!

Just posted!

Hi when will you deconstruct No. 5? Much appreciated.

Could you please deconstruct no5. ?

Check it out!

Please Please deconstruct 5 ASAP, first draft due in 5 days!!!! Thanks!

I just did! It’s a very interesting title.

Hi, when will you deconstruct #3? Much appreciated.

I have just posted this. Thanks!

Hi, when will you deconstruct #4? Thanks!

Just updated!

Hi, is there more in depth analysis of title 4 coming?

Sorry it took a while, but it’s here now!

I have a question, for PT3, so what will be our possible counterclaim? is it another factor that will make it slow? or find another RLS that show sometimes fresh ideas can be adopted fast ?

I would reread the prescribe title. The title is asking you “why”. So all you need to do is propose different sorts of reasons as to why this slowness occurs. You don’t need to challenge the assumption within the title that it is slow. Accept that it is slow, and propose various ideas for why that is the case according to the properties of your chosen AOK.

Could you explain how you would format number One. Would I only be talking about two examples one for each AOK and what about them? Introduction, aok 1 and aok2 and conclusions

For sure! You should refer to my article on structuring for TOK Essay for more details. In general though, you can approach this prompt with two examples for each AOK, with one example about subjectivity being overly celebrated, and one not in the arts, while for history, it would be one where it is condemned unfairly vs not.

Leave a comment Cancel reply

• Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
• Subscribe Subscribed
• Copy shortlink
• Report this content
• View post in Reader
• Manage subscriptions
• Collapse this bar

May 2024 TOK Essay Prompts | IB Experts Guide + Examples

Table of contents

• Writing Metier

The TOK essay prescribed titles for May 2024 are now available.  Understanding these TOK essay prompts is essential for IB students aiming for a successful essay. This is why I’m writing this article with expert suggestions from our IB experts for you.

UPD… November 2024 TOK titles released !

I do not want to spend your precious time with a long introduction, so let me go straight to the point!

May 2024 TOK essay titles list

Here’s a breakdown of each title, offering insights and potential approaches.

• Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history?  Discuss with reference to the arts and history.
• How can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization and generalization in the production of knowledge?  Discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.
• Nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them?  Discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge.
• Do we underestimate the challenges of taking knowledge out of its original context and transferring it to a different context?  Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.
• Do we need custodians of knowledge?  Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.
• Are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitably the strongest?  Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge.

Get TOK essay assistance from IB experts

At Writing Metier, we understand the intricacies and challenges of crafting a compelling TOK essay . Our team of seasoned IB experts is here to guide you every step of the way for Custom TOK Essay

We will provide you with a tailor-made sample TOK essay that aligns seamlessly with your specific instructions, adheres to the TOK essay rubric , and meets the overarching IB criteria. 

Trust in our expertise and let us support you in achieving excellence in your TOK essay writing .

Breakdown of each 2024 May TOK Essay Prompt

Now, let me break each TOK essay title for May 2024 in detail. I’ll also suggest several possible areas of knowledge, ways of knowing and applicable real-life examples to give you some inspiration for these prompts.

Let’s begin!

TITLE 1:   Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history? Discuss with reference to the arts and history.

Examine the role of emotion and intuition WOKs in the arts, where personal interpretations often lead to diverse artistic expressions. 

For instance, Picasso’s abstract art is open to multiple interpretations. Contrast this with history, where reason and language WOKs play a pivotal role in documenting events. 

For example, while historians value primary sources for their objectivity, they often criticize biased accounts.

TITLE 2:   How can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization and generalization in the production of knowledge? Discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.

In mathematics, specialization might refer to mastering a specific theorem, while generalization involves understanding broader mathematical principles. 

For instance, Pythagoras’ theorem is specialized, but its application in various real-life scenarios , like architecture, is a generalization. Contrast this with the natural sciences, where specialized knowledge might refer to niche research studies, while general knowledge encompasses broader scientific theories.

TITLE 3:   Nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them? Discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge.

In human sciences, new psychological theories, for instance, undergo rigorous testing and peer reviews before acceptance. This slow adoption ensures reliability. 

Contrast this with ethics, where new moral ideas, like those concerning AI’s rights, face resistance due to cultural and societal values, making their adoption slow.

TITLE 4:   Do we underestimate the challenges of taking knowledge out of its original context and transferring it to a different context? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

In religious knowledge systems, scriptures taken out of their historical context can lead to misinterpretations. 

For instance, ancient religious texts might not directly apply to modern ethical dilemmas. 

Similarly, in the arts, a piece of art created in a specific cultural context might lose its original meaning when viewed in a different cultural setting.

TITLE 5:   Do we need custodians of knowledge? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

In indigenous knowledge systems, elders often act as custodians, preserving traditions and stories for future generations. Their role ensures that knowledge is not lost over time. 

In contrast, academic journals and institutions act as custodians in the natural sciences, ensuring that scientific knowledge is recorded, peer-reviewed, and accessible for future research.

TITLE 6:   Are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitably the strongest? Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge.

In the natural sciences, newer research, such as recent findings on climate change, might be considered more accurate due to advanced technology and methodologies. However, it’s essential to consider the reliability and validity of these findings. 

In history, newer historical evidence, like a recently discovered manuscript, might shed light on an event, but its authenticity and context must be verified.

Now let me share some samples written by our expert IB writers at Writing Metier.

Breathe Easy! We’re Handling Your Paper

• Polished Papers : Styled right, glitch-free
• Ask Away : Direct chat with your writer
• Free Goodies : Revisions, title page, and bib
• Fair Prices : Plus a money-back guarantee
• All Human : No AI, just real experts
• Private & Secure : Your details, our secret

Bye-Bye, Burnout!

Slash 15% OFF using the coupon code: BLG15WM

May 2024 TOK essay samples

Let’s start with the sample of the TOK essay on May 2024 prompt 2 – How can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization and generalization in the production of knowledge?

If you need a professionally written TOK essay, feel free to ask for help from our IB experts.

If you have missed it, I also have an article about prior TOK essay titles with suggestions and samples. Make sure to check them out as well!

The year 2023:

• November 2023 TOK essay prompts
• May 2023 TOK essay titles

The year 2022:

• November 2022 TOK essay prompts
• May 2022 ToK essay titles

Previous years’ prompts:

• November 2021 ToK Essay titles
• May 2021 Theory of Knowledge essay prompts

With a clear understanding of these TOK titles, IB students are well-prepared to select a topic and begin their essay. 

Need a Dope Paper Written? We've Got Your Back!

Keep in mind that the key to a compelling TOK essay is a thorough understanding of the chosen prompt and a structured approach to addressing it.

If you need assistance writing a custom TOK essay , Writing Metier is here to help you out. Contact our support team via email or using a live chat or simply fill out our online order form with details of your IB TOK essay.

Free topic suggestions

Vasy kafidoff.

Vasyl Kafidoff is a co-founder and CEO at WritingMetier. He is interested in education and how modern technology makes it more accessible. He wants to bring awareness about new learning possibilities as an educational specialist. When Vasy is not working, he’s found behind a drum kit.

Similar posts

November 2024 tok essay prompts explained + samples.

This article is a complete guide to the November 2023 TOK essay prompts, which includes detailed explanations of each prompt along with samples to help students understand them better. It offers practical advice and expert guidance to help students improve their writing skills and succeed in this important assignment. Whether you need help selecting a topic or want to enhance your critical thinking skills, this article provides valuable insights that will help you craft a successful TOK essay.

IB ToK Essay Prompts for November 2024

Every year, students who started IBDP are waiting for IB to share the list of specific prescribed titles for Theory of Knowledge essays. Like in all the previous years, IB opened a list of six topics for TOK essays for the next semester.

ToK Essay Titles November 2024 | Explained + SAMPLES

In this article, we will be talking about the six Theory of knowledge essay topics students enrolled in the IB diploma need to be aware of. Just like every year, this TOK November’s topics vary in different elements, and in this article, we will share descriptions about each topic which the students need to keep in their minds when selecting the essay topic for their diplomas.

30 Different TOK Presentation Topic Ideas to Succeed in IB

Given that the TOK essay's structure and the presentation are unlike others, students can find it challenging to proceed with it. You can only do well on the TOK presentation if you have an excellent idea.

May 2023 TOK Essay Prompts + SAMPLES and Suggestions

Every year, students anxiously wait for the IB to announce the TOK essay topics. So this year is not an exception; IBO has also announced 2023 May titles for IB TOK essay. In this article, we have provided the list of prompts with short directions and suggestions for each topic. Enjoy reading ;)

TOK Exhibition IA Prompts 2023/2024

The list of TOK exhibition prompts for the years 2023/2024. You can easily get through the TOK exhibition with the right understanding of how to work your way through it. All you need is to select the right TOK exhibition IA prompt and have the proper focus with determination to complete it.

We rely on cookies to give you the best experince on our website. By browsing, you agree to it. Read more

• Mathematics: AA SL
• Mathematics: AA HL
• Mathematics: AI SL
• Mathematics: AI HL
• Biology SL (FE2025)
• Biology HL (FE2025)
• Biology SL (FE2016)
• Biology HL (FE2016)
• Chemistry SL (FE2025)
• Chemistry HL (FE2025)
• Chemistry SL (FE2016)
• Chemistry HL (FE2016)
• Physics SL (FE2025)
• Physics HL (FE2025)
• Physics SL (FE2016)
• Physics HL (FE2016)
• Business SL (FE2024)
• Business HL (FE2024)
• Business SL (FE2016)
• Business HL (FE2016)
• Economics SL
• Economics HL
• Psychology SL
• Psychology HL
• Computer Science SL
• Computer Science HL
• English A LAL SL
• English A LAL HL

TOK Chronicles: Decoding the TOK Essay Prompts for May 2024

As the May 2024 International Baccalaureate (IB) assessment approaches, students preparing for the Theory of Knowledge (TOK) Essay are faced with intriguing and thought-provoking prompts. These essay topics delve into the essence of knowledge, challenging students to explore various facets of how we acquire, interpret, and utilize information. In this guide, we will dissect each of the six essay prompts, providing insights and considerations for students embarking on their TOK Essay journey.

1. Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history? Discuss with reference to the arts and history.

This prompt challenges students to delve into the intricate relationship between subjectivity and objectivity in the realms of the arts and history. It prompts a sophisticated exploration of the interplay between the two, urging students to consider the celebration of subjectivity in the arts and the potential unfair condemnation of subjectivity in historical narratives. The essay should focus on the methodologies in each discipline, discussing how subjectivity manifests and whether it is a constructive or destructive force in knowledge production.

2. How can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization and generalization in the production of knowledge? Discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.

This prompt delves into the tension between specialization and generalization in knowledge production. Students are encouraged to define these terms in a TOK context and discuss how each demand affects the production of knowledge. By referencing mathematics and another AOK, such as literature or natural sciences, students can explore the unique challenges and benefits associated with specialization and generalization and ponder how these demands can be reconciled.

3. Nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them? Discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge.

Addressing the sluggish adoption of fresh ideas in various AOKs, this prompt prompts students to examine the dynamics of knowledge adoption. Focusing on the human sciences and another AOK, students can explore factors influencing the pace of adoption, such as societal acceptance, methodological considerations, and the nature of each discipline. The essay should consider whether the pace of adoption is justified or if there are inherent challenges hindering the assimilation of new ideas.

4. Do we underestimate the challenges of taking knowledge out of its original context and transferring it to a different context? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

This prompt encourages an exploration of the challenges associated with transferring knowledge across different contexts. By referencing two AOKs, students can discuss the implications of removing knowledge from its original setting and examine how context influences interpretation. The essay should analyze whether the difficulties of transferring knowledge are underestimated and consider the impact of this process on the reliability and validity of the knowledge.

5. Do we need custodians of knowledge? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

Exploring the concept of custodianship, this prompt encourages students to evaluate the necessity of individuals or entities safeguarding knowledge. By referencing two contrasting AOKs, students can examine the role of custodians in preserving, disseminating, and potentially limiting knowledge. The essay should delve into the impact of custodianship on the nature and accessibility of knowledge within each AOK.

6. Are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitably the strongest? Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge.

Challenging the assumption that the most recent evidence is always the strongest, this prompt prompts students to explore the dynamics of evidence evaluation. Referencing the natural sciences and another AOK, students can analyze how the validity and strength of evidence vary across disciplines. The essay should consider the factors influencing the perceived strength of evidence, such as methodologies, societal expectations, and the nature of the knowledge in question.

As students grapple with these compelling TOK Essay prompts, a journey of critical thinking and exploration unfolds. Each topic invites a unique perspective and challenges students to apply TOK concepts in real-world contexts. By delving into the intricacies of replicability, the explicable and the inexplicable, information bubbles, the relationship between knowledge and power, visual representations, and the impact of methodologies, students embark on a voyage of intellectual discovery integral to the TOK experience.

With Blen, you can test your knowledge and hone your skills with real exam-like questions. Get onboard now and take control of your future!

One Subscription, for All Your IBDP Subjects

Unrestricted access to IBDP Exam-style questions, key concepts, mock test, performance score cards and more…

One FREE student Account with Unrestricted access to IBDP Exam-style questions, key concepts, mock test, assignment, student analytics and more…

Understanding Core and Optional Themes in IB TOK

An overview of the five optional themes in tok, connecting the dots: tok core theme, tok chronicles: understand the concept of effective research, tok chronicles: exploring truth, perception, and belief, unveiling the essence of ib diploma programme's tok, how and why ibdp tok is a vital subject, guidelines for crafting claims and counterclaims in your tok essay.

Blen is an interactive, auto-graded platform for IBDP students, teachers, and schools. It provides curriculum-aligned content, interactive questions, adaptive mock tests, assignments, and detailed reports to help unlock IBDP potential.

Be the first to know about our news and special offers direct to your inbox.

I consent to the processing of my personal data, in order to receive news and updates of Blen, according to the " Privacy Statement "

May 2024 TOK Essay Titles. Short Descriptions & Tips for Writing

Luke MacQuoid

• January 10, 2024

Table of Contents

Hello, IB students! As a seasoned IB writer, I’m thrilled to share my insights on the intriguing May 2024 TOK essay titles. Having walked the complex world of Theory of Knowledge, I understand the challenges and excitement that come with these essays. Let’s dig into each title by offering practical strategies and psychological hooks to make your TOK path rewarding and enjoyable.

What Are TOK Essay Titles?

So, Theory of Knowledge essay titles are prompts provided by the International Baccalaureate (IB) Organization for students enrolled in the IB Diploma Programme. These prompts form the basis for the TOK essay, a core component of the IB curriculum. Here’s a bit more about them:

• The TOK essay encourages students to reflect on the nature of knowledge and how we come to know what we claim to know. It’s an exercise in critical thinking and philosophical inquiry designed to challenge students’ understanding of knowledge.
• Typically, the IB provides a list of prescribed titles for each exam session. These titles are carefully formulated questions covering various knowledge, understanding, and belief topics.
• The questions often require students to draw upon different Areas of Knowledge (AOKs) — such as the Natural Sciences, Human Sciences, History, or the Arts — and Ways of Knowing (WOKs) like Language, Emotion, Reason, or Sense Perception. The essay prompts students to analyze and evaluate knowledge claims, considering their validity and the role of perspective.
• In writing the essay, students are expected to engage with the title critically and thoughtfully, often drawing on real-life situations (RLS) or personal experiences to illustrate their points. The essay should demonstrate the student’s ability to think deeply about knowledge and its implications.
• The TOK essay is externally assessed and contributes to the overall score of the IB Diploma. It is evaluated based on criteria that include understanding of knowledge issues, critical thinking, organization and analysis, and clarity of expression.

In essence, the TOK essay titles serve as a starting point for deep and reflective research of how we know what we know, and they play a crucial role in developing critical thinking and analytical skills in IB students. By the way, we have previously reviewed the November 2023 TOK essay titles .

May 2024 TOK Essay Titles: An Overview

Having established a solid foundation, let’s focus on the six engaging TOK essay titles for May 2024. Additionally, our blog offers numerous informative articles. We suggest checking out our piece on the TOK and EE matrix for more valuable insights.

1. Is Subjectivity Overly Celebrated in the Arts but Unfairly Condemned in History?

Discuss with reference to the Arts and History.

In my opinion, the first title probes the intriguing contrast in how we perceive subjectivity in the arts and history. AOKs like Visual Arts or Music and WOKs like Emotion and Imagination come into play for the arts. Conversely, in history, we lean on Reason and Language. A riveting RLS could be the differing interpretations of historical events in movies or paintings. Here’s a tip: balance your essay with examples showing both the necessity and pitfalls of subjectivity in these fields.

2. How Can We Reconcile the Opposing Demands for Specialization and Generalization in the Production of Knowledge?

Discuss with reference to Mathematics and one other area of knowledge.

Next, we tackle the delicate balance between specialization and generalization. Particularly, let’s focus on mathematics and other areas like Ethics. Mathematics thrives on specialization – think of the precise nature of algorithms. In Ethics, however, a more generalized approach often prevails. From my experience, a compelling RLS could involve the ethical implications of AI in mathematical problems. My suggestion? Highlight the benefits and drawbacks of both approaches in producing knowledge.

3. Nothing Is More Exciting than Fresh Ideas, So Why Are Areas of Knowledge Often So Slow to Adopt Them?

Discuss with reference to the Human Sciences and one other area of knowledge.

Nothing excites me more than fresh ideas, yet they’re often slow to be adopted. This title invites us to examine this paradox in the human sciences and another area, say, Natural Sciences. Consider the slow acceptance of psychological theories or environmental concerns. As I know it, the key here is to research the resistance and eventual acceptance of new ideas, using specific examples that demonstrate this dynamic.

4. Do We Underestimate the Challenges of Taking Knowledge out of Its Original Context and Transferring It to a Different Context?

Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

Now, let’s ponder the underestimated challenges of transferring knowledge across contexts. My advice? Choose two contrasting areas: Ethics and Physics. Discuss how ethical principles might struggle to find relevance in physical theories or vice versa. This title requires a nuanced understanding of the limitations and potentials of knowledge application.

5. Do We Need Custodians of Knowledge?

Do we need custodians of knowledge? This title pushes us to think about who controls knowledge and why. For instance, consider the role of peer review in Natural Sciences and the guardians of historical narratives in History. According to general IB criteria, debating the positive and negative aspects of having knowledge custodians is crucial.

6. Are We Too Quick to Assume That the Most Recent Evidence Is Inevitably the Strongest?

Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge.

Lastly, we question our tendency to favor recent evidence. In areas like Biology and History, this can be particularly prevalent. From my experience, a great RLS could involve new archaeological findings versus established historical narratives. Using solid examples and critical analysis, challenge the assumption that new is always better.

The Best Writing Tips for TOK Essays

Drawing on my extensive experience as an IB writer, I’m here to offer you some insider tips for writing a successful Theory of Knowledge essay. The essence of an excellent paper lies in the fusion of critical thinking, deep personal reflection, and solid academic argumentation. Let’s look at some strategies for improving your writing.

Personal Insight and Scholarly Perspectives

In my opinion, the most compelling TOK essays are those that masterfully blend personal insights with academic viewpoints. This balancing act is not always straightforward but achievable with the right approach. Here’s what I’ve learned:

• Begin with a personal observation or experience that intrigued you. It can serve as a powerful springboard into a broader academic discussion. For instance, a personal encounter with a scientific phenomenon could lead to research of scientific theories.
• Critically assess your personal experiences. It’s important to scrutinize and question your experiences, not just narrate them. Ask yourself how these experiences illuminate more significant concepts or ideas within the TOK framework.
• Correlate your reflections with established knowledge. As I know from experience, an essay that weaves personal insights with academic research stands out. Make sure to support your insight with scholarly evidence or theories.

Remember, your TOK essay is an opportunity to showcase your ability to think critically and reflect deeply on the nature of knowledge.

Writing a Clear and Cohesive TOK Essay

According to general IB criteria, clarity and coherence are non-negotiable in a TOK essay. A clear, well-structured essay not only demonstrates your understanding but also engages and convinces your reader. Here are some techniques I’ve found useful:

• Create a detailed essay outline before you start writing. It will help organize your thoughts and ensure each paragraph connects seamlessly to the next.
• Steer clear of unnecessary jargon and overly complex language. Simplicity is often more powerful.
• Each paragraph should serve a purpose. It should either introduce a new idea or build upon the previous one, all contributing to your overarching argument.

Need help with your IB TOK essay?

From research and analysis to structuring and editing, our skilled mentors will be by your side, helping you write an exceptional TOK essay that meets the word count and stringent IB criteria.

From my experience, these strategies will improve the quality of your TOK essay and make the writing process more enjoyable and fulfilling. Also, you can consult with your teacher or supervisor .

Addressing Counterarguments in Your TOK Essay

An aspect that often distinguishes an excellent TOK essay from a good one is the ability to address counterarguments effectively. This skill demonstrates not only depth of understanding but also critical engagement with the essay topic. In my years of writing and mentoring IB students, I’ve gathered some insights on how to do this effectively:

• Begin by thinking about possible objections or alternate viewpoints to your argument. From experience, understanding different perspectives enhances your argument’s depth and shows your ability to engage critically with the topic.
• More than just a counterargument is needed; you should integrate it into your discussion. It means examining how it interacts with your original argument. From my experience, a well-integrated counterargument can strengthen your position by showing you’ve considered multiple angles.
• There are two main ways to deal with a counterargument: refute it with evidence and reasoning or reconcile it with your argument, finding a middle ground. Choose the approach that most effectively strengthens your essay, depending on the situation.

Remember, TOK is about exploring knowledge, not just defending a position. As such, encountering and addressing counterarguments can be a valuable learning experience, offering insights you might not have considered otherwise.

The Bottom Line

May 2024 TOK essay titles are not just academic exercises. They’re gateways to deeper understanding and critical thinking. My parting advice? Be bold in your assertions, critical in your analysis, and most importantly, enjoy the intellectual research. Good luck, scholars! Also, remember that you can always contact our IB writers if you need help with the TOK essay .

Luke MacQuoid has extensive experience teaching English as a foreign language in Japan, having worked with students of all ages for over 12 years. Currently, he is teaching at the tertiary level. Luke holds a BA from the University of Sussex and an MA in TESOL from Lancaster University, both located in England. As well to his work as an IB Examiner and Master Tutor, Luke also enjoys sharing his experiences and insights with others through writing articles for various websites, including extendedessaywriters.com blog

Our Services:

Extended Essay

Internal Assessment

TOK Exhibition

IB Language Paper

Other IB Assignments

A secure and reliable place for students to team up with pros who specialize in exactly what they need help with.

Fair Use Policy

Cookie Police

Revision Policy

Refund Policy

How to Use Our Service:

The services provided by ExtendedEssayWriters.com are strictly for research, guidance, and inspiration. The papers you receive from our site are not intended for direct submission. Always create your own work and use Extended Essay Writers as a reference tool. We do not condone or support any kind of academic dishonesty.

• Support Dashboard
• Support LiveChat 
• Terms And Conditions
• Privacy Policy

TOK May 2024 Essay Title 5: Do we need custodians of knowledge? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge

Geography & Theory of Knowledge

January 10th, 2024 Last updated: February 7th, 2024

This is an interesting essay because it will give you a chance to discuss whether or not there is a necessity to protect knowledge. This could be from a number of outside influences such as those wanting to disrupt or change knowledge or the methods used to gather knowledge. If we decide that custodians are needed there is also the potential question of who they should be to consider. 

Meet our ToK Tutors

In any good TOK essay there are a number of prerequisites that are important to ensure you have a good basis to your answer. We will look at these with particular reference to this question and consider some ideas and real life situations that you can use to ensure you are maximising your marks from this task. You should use the structure below to shape your essay. Remember the essay is limited to 1600 words so make sure that you use your allocation wisely. There are 8 paragraphs listed below meaning you should write around 200 words for each one. 

The key thing about the TOK essay is that you need to make sure every part of it contributes towards answering the question, whether it is through an example or with direct reference to the question itself. This will give your essay focus and keep you on track. 

You should follow these steps to give your essay the required structure: 

Introduction: Unpack the title and state your opinion on the question. Initially what are your thoughts? 

In your introduction it is essential that you demonstrate that you understand the key terms in the essay and that you outline your answer to the question in the title. This doesn’t mean that you write out a series of key terms and definitions, you should use them in sentences effectively to show your understanding. The discussion of the key terms in this essay in a TOK context are below: 

Key Terms: 

Custodian: I like to imagine a custodian of knowledge as someone who guards knowledge to preserve it the way it is “supposed” to be viewed or used. This can be considered on a number of levels in different Areas of Knowledge. For example a custodian of knowledge in the natural sciences may be a person who is protective of the scientific method, ensuring consistency in the way information is gathered. On another  level they may be University academics who are peer reviewing work to assess whether or not it should be accepted in their field. Lastly a more radical version of a custodian of knowledge could be a person who is protecting knowledge so it doesn’t get into the wrong hands- a method for creating a harmful weapon for example. It is up to you to decide how to define a custodian, encompassing these ideas above. 

Need: Is there a need to protect the generation and use of knowledge? In many ways the answer to this question is yes. Ensuring there is order in knowledge creation means there is a structure to how people understand knowledge and what is accepted or rejected. Can you imagine what would happen if there was no overarching guidance on what should be accepted as a cure for a virus for example? Conversely are there any instances when we should share knowledge without question? 

This question gives you the opportunity to choose two of your own areas of knowledge here. I am going to choose Natural Sciences and History. I Did consider using the Arts and you could too. This could be centred around questions such as who gets to decide what is art? Do not forget to include your real world examples. 

Body paragraph 1: Claim 1 linked to Natural Sciences

It is imperative that there are custodians of knowledge in the Natural Sciences to protect the scientific method and the generation of new treatments for medical issues. 

The idea of peer review- essentially checking and ensuring new ideas in medicine (and all science) is very important. Ultimately, the more people that have checked and verified treatment, the more likely it is to be safe for use with patients. The concept of the custodians here are the people carrying out the peer reviews and checks of the treatment or drug. Many similar examples could be used across Physics as well- how easy is it to get a new theory accepted by an academic community? Why is this the case? Do they take too long to get accepted because the custodians are too strict?

Body paragraph 2: Counterclaim 1 linked to Natural Sciences. 

It could be argued that it is essential that vaccinations, once accepted and proven to be medically sound, are shared freely and are not subject to monetary restrictions. The custodian in this example is essentially the pharmaceutical company who has produced the vaccine for sale. Do they have the right to keep these vaccines from others, restricting their sharing by putting an extra cost on their distribution? In the case of the COVID-19 pandemic you could investigate how the vaccines were shared- were they shared fairly? What was the outcome of the COVID-19 patent waiver? 

Body paragraph 3: Implications on the Natural Sciences. 

Here you should consider what would happen if there were no custodians in the Natural Sciences and outline to what extent you think they are needed in the AOK. In the examples above (particularly the first one) they are very much needed to ensure the right treatments reach the right people. You could mention the idea that laws are in place to ensure that vaccines are peer reviewed and therefore governments place a role in ensuring peer review, and therefore custodians of knowledge play a role in protecting the distribution of knowledge. 

IF YOU DO USE HISTORY FOR THIS NEXT AOK ENSURE THAT YOU ARE CONSIDERING HOW KNOWLEDGE IS GATHERED IN HISTORY, NOT JUST THE FACTS THEMSELVES.  

Body paragraph 4: Claim 2 linked to History 

Official secrets (or in this case knowledge) should be guarded carefully as the implications of the use of this knowledge can be devastating. There are any number of secrets that are kept in government archives from the past or present that could have huge consequences on the public if they are released. They could range from weapons designs to the existence of aliens. It is important though that if you go down this route that you don’t get sidetracked by conspiracy theory and that you still answer the question- Is there a need for the custodian? How are they protecting the public/people by keeping things hidden? What would be the consequences if this information was released? How could new information have an impact on the knowledge of certain events and the way information is gathered about that event? 

Body paragraph 5: Counterclaim 2 linked to History 

Custodians have sometimes failed to share knowledge that would have a positive impact. The judgments people make on whether to share knowledge or not may result in negative consequences. This paragraph would argue that it is important to ensure the custodians are the correct people to guard the knowledge. An example of this can be found by searching for Katharine Gun, she was working for the British government and leaked information about the US spying on the United Nations before a key vote on the Iraq war. 

This example raises some great ideas and questions but do make sure you are answering the essay question here. Focus on the idea of the impact that this information would have on the historical analysis/investigation of the Iraq war. How would this impact perceptions and interpretations of the event? 

Body paragraph 6: Implications on History 

There is a need for custodians of knowledge in History, clearly illustrated by the examples above. You must focus on the methods of gathering knowledge in this AOK though and how knowledge of past events can be used for analysis. It is the impact of the discovery of this knowledge that will enable you to assess whether or not knowledge should be shared. 

Overall conclusion: summarise your main perspectives and explain how your findings have implications on the real world and overall areas of knowledge you have chosen. It is clear that there are different elements of knowledge that need protecting from certain groups of people and custodians need to be in place to ensure that this takes place. Make sure you answer the question- is there a need for a custodian? 

Final Thoughts: 

The highest scoring essays in TOK do the following: 

• They are insightful, convincing, accomplished and lucid (from the markscheme) 
• They demonstrate how TOK appears in the real world by using real world examples. 
• They are supported by academic thinkers. 
• They answer the question accurately. 

Thank you for reading. Read my guide to question 6 here!

Good luck with your essay! 

Related subjects

Edward - Please add this tutor to your enquiry and complete the enquiry form to determine availability. ">Contact us for availability

Edward is a highly experienced GCSE and IB Diploma Programme practitioner with 6 years experience of leading the IBDP at 2 different international...

Edward is a highly experienced GCSE and IB Diploma Programme practitioner with 6 years experience of leading the IBDP at 2 different international schools. His specialist subject is Geography...

If you liked this article, subscribe to our newsletter

By subscribing to our newsletter you agree to receive email from us and agree to our Terms and Conditions*

Start the discussion! Cancel reply

Tok essays 2024. essay title 2. how can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization and generalization in the production of knowledge discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge.

In this blog, experienced ToK teacher Edward, sets out to outline ideas for Theory of Knowledge May 2024, Question 2. This is 2 of 6 in a series on the TOK Essay titles for May 2024.

Author Edward Michael Read 8 minutes

TOK Essays 2024. Essay Title 1: Is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history?

In the first blog of 6, Edward outlines approaches to answering the first Theory of Knowledge essay question for the May 2024 session.

Author Edward Michael Read 7 minutes

IB Theory of Knowledge Presentation: choosing a Real-Life Situation (RLS)

In this blog, Calum explores the presentation component of the IB's Theory of Knowledge assessment. He gives a detailed overview of the format, outlines the importance of including real-life situations, and offers a helpful guide to choosing the perfect real-life situation to make an excellent presentation.

Author Owl Tutors Read 4 minutes

What is Theory of Knowledge in the IB and how does it work?

In this blog, Calum sets out the principle ideas and terminology of the Theory of Knowledge course, a mandatory part of the International Baccalaureate Diploma. He de-mystifies some of the language used in the ToK and explains the way that ToK works, giving a clear guide to students seeking to understand the basics of the course.

Author Owl Tutors Read 6 minutes

You might be interested in

Essay title 6: are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitably the strongest discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge..

Author: Edward Michael

Essay Title 4: Do we underestimate the challenges of taking knowledge out of its original context and transferring it to a different context? Discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge.

Tok essay title 3 may 2024: nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge..

+44 020 3457 8474 [email protected]

Owl Tutors Limited Company Number: 07679444 VAT Number 182078794 Unit 2A, The Plough Brewery 516 Wandsworth Road London SW8 3JX United Kingdom

2024 Copyright Owl Tutors | Terms & Conditions | UK | Privacy Policy

We store some data to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with this. You can learn more here

Example essays

As part of theory of knowledge (TOK), each student chooses one essay title from six issued by International Baccalaureate®(IB). 

The titles change in each examination session. 

Upcoming and past questions include: 

• “To what extent are areas of knowledge shaped by their past? Consider with reference to two areas of knowledge.”
•  “'There is no reason why we cannot link facts and theories across disciplines and create a common groundwork of explanation.' To what extent do you agree with this statement?”
• “There is no such thing as a neutral question. Evaluate this statement with reference to two areas of knowledge.”
• “'The task of history is the discovering of the constant and universal principles of human nature.' To what extent are history and one other area of knowledge successful in this task?”

Further guidance on the TOK essay and exhibition can be found in the IB’s Programme Resource Centre (PRC) .

Materials in the PRC are only available to existing IB World Schools. These materials are free.

There are a number of resources on TOK in the IB Store , which are available to everyone.

Find out how to become an IB World School .

IB TOK Essay examples

Type a search phrase to find the most relevant TOK Essay examples for you

Not sure what to search for? You can always look through our example Theory of Knowledge coursework below for inspiration.

All TOK Essay Examples

Filter exemplars, how can we reconcile the opposing demands for specialization and generalization in the production of knowledge discuss with reference to mathematics and one other area of knowledge., are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitably the strongest discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge., want to get full marks for your tok essay allow us to review it for you 🎯, do we need custodians of knowledge discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge., is replicability necessary in the production of knowledge discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge., are visual representations always helpful in the communication of knowledge discuss with reference to the human sciences and mathematics., fast track your coursework with mark schemes moderated by ib examiners. upgrade now 🚀, for artists and natural scientists, which is more important: what can be explained or what cannot be explained discuss with reference to the arts and the natural sciences., does it matter if our acquisition of knowledge happens in "bubbles" where some information and voices are excluded discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge., to what extent is the knowledge we produce determined by the methodologies we use discuss with reference to history and one area of knowledge., tok essay: 5. “how can we distinguish between good and bad interpretations discuss with reference to the arts and one other area of knowledge”, nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them, do we need custodians of knowledge discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge, nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them discuss with reference to the human sciences and one other area of knowledge., is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history discuss with reference to the arts and history., is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history, do we underestimate the challenges of taking knowledge out of its original context and transferring it to a different context discuss with reference to two areas of knowledge., is subjectivity overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history discuss with reference to the arts and history, nothing is more exciting than fresh ideas, so why are areas of knowledge often so slow to adopt them discuss with reference to the human sciences and the natural sciences..

Custom TOK essays, exhibitions, scripts, presentations, PPDs

Nothing Is More Exciting Than Fresh Ideas, So Why Are Areas of Knowledge Often So Slow To Adopt Them?

Welcome to the thrilling world of Theory of Knowledge (TOK) essays! As an experienced IB tutor and writer, I’ve managed the ebbs and flows of TOK, and I’m excited to guide you through the May 2024 TOK essay Prompt #3. It challenges us to research why some knowledge areas are sluggish in adopting fresh ideas, particularly in the Human Sciences and other areas of our choice.

3. The Shift from Traditional to Online News Media

5. the integration of ai in healthcare diagnosis.

This article will guide you in creating the best TOK essay on Prompt #3. And trust me, it’s simpler than you think. Let’s begin!

How to Work on the TOK Essay Prompt #3

Approaching this prompt requires a blend of creativity and critical thinking. Firstly, understand the essence of the question: it probes the reluctance or delay in accepting new ideas within certain knowledge domains. Start by brainstorming examples where this phenomenon is evident. Identify clear instances where the reluctance to get new ideas is observable. This could include:

• Historical scientific paradigms, such as the shift from geocentric to heliocentric astronomical models.
• Current educational methodologies are resisting technological integration.
• Medical fields that are initially skeptical about alternative therapies.
• Environmental sciences’ slow adoption of new sustainability models.

Then, reflect on the underlying reasons. Is it due to the inherent nature of the field, societal influences, or the limitations of human cognition? It is where you can showcase your understanding of the TOK concepts. Don’t just scratch the surface; aim to dissect the intricacies of knowledge acquisition and acceptance.

Next, consider structuring your TOK essay around contrasting viewpoints:

• One perspective might argue that the slow adoption of new ideas is due to the rigorous validation processes inherent in scientific and academic fields, ensuring reliability.
• The opposite viewpoint could stress the role of cognitive biases and resistance to change in hindering the acceptance of new ideas.

Juxtaposing these perspectives will demonstrate your ability to evaluate complex TOK concepts critically. Remember, the goal is to present a well-reasoned, thoroughly analyzed, and engagingly written paper reflecting critical thinking and your unique perspective as a successful IB student .

Best AOKs and WOKs for the TOK Essay Prompt #3

For this prompt, the Areas of Knowledge (AOKs) that stand out are the Human Sciences and Natural Sciences:

• The Human Sciences, like Psychology or Sociology, often face challenges in swiftly integrating new theories due to ethical considerations and the complexity of human behavior.
• Natural Sciences, while more systematic, can also exhibit reluctance, possibly due to established paradigms or the cost of technological advancements.

Regarding Ways of Knowing (WOKs), Reason and Emotion are the best options. But why? Reason allows us to critically analyze new ideas, while Emotion in TOK essay can either be a barrier or a catalyst in accepting these ideas. Also, consider Language a WOK since how new concepts are communicated can significantly impact their acceptance.

Getting into these AOKs and WOKs, you’ll find rich content to discuss the prompt’s nuances. It’s about striking a balance between depth and breadth — ensuring each point is thoroughly researched and linked to the prompt.

Real-Life Situations for the TOK Essay Prompt #3

Each example should illustrate the prompt and provide a platform for discussing the interplay between AOKs and WOKs. Remember, an excellent real-life situation is like a window, offering a clear view into the complexities of knowledge.

The examples below offer a distinctive standpoint on accepting or resisting new ideas in various areas of knowledge. It opens up fertile ground for examining the complex dynamics between AOKs and WOKs within the context of TOK Essay Prompt #3.

1. Reluctance in Accepting Behavioral Economics

In economics, the initial skepticism towards behavioral economics stands out. Traditionally dominated by models assuming rational decision-making, the field was slow to integrate insights about irrational consumer behaviors and cognitive biases. This situation demonstrates the interplay between the AOKs of Human Sciences and Economics and the WOKs of Reason and Emotion, showcasing how entrenched theories can overshadow emerging perspectives.

2. Resistance to Genetic Modification in Agriculture

Another example is the agricultural sector’s hesitant reception of genetically modified (GM) crops. Despite scientific assurances of safety and efficiency, public apprehension and ethical debates have slowed their acceptance. This instance ties into Natural Sciences and Environmental Science, highlighting the role of Ethics (a WOK) in mediating the acceptance of new scientific ideas.

The media industry’s transition from print to digital platforms illustrates a significant shift in knowledge dissemination. The initial resistance by traditional news outlets to adopt digital platforms reveals the challenges of accepting new technological paradigms. This scenario connects to the AOK of Arts and Humanities and involves Language and Technology (as WOKs), underscoring the impact of societal and technological changes on knowledge sharing.

Need Help with Your IB TOK Essay?

Maximize your potential and boost the excellence of your TOK Essay with the help of our experts at BuyTOKEssay.com! Whether you’re starting from scratch or fine-tuning your existing assignment to meet the demands of your supervisor, our team is here to make your dream of a perfect paper a reality. Say goodbye to writer’s block and hello to success with just one click.

4. The Slow Transition to Renewable Energy

Despite clear evidence supporting the benefits of renewable energy, the gradual shift away from fossil fuels to renewable sources like solar and wind energy is noteworthy. This reflects the complexities within Environmental Science and Ethics, with Reason and Emotion critical in influencing decision-making processes.

A contemporary example is the healthcare industry’s cautious approach toward integrating artificial intelligence (AI) for diagnostics and treatment planning. While AI offers efficiency and accuracy, issues around trust, ethics, and the potential for error have influenced its slow adoption. This scenario ties into the Natural Sciences and Human Sciences, with Reason, Emotion, and Ethics being central WOKs, illustrating the tension between technological advancement and ethical considerations.

Final Thoughts

In wrapping up, remember that writing a TOK essay on Prompt #3 is an opportunity to showcase your understanding of how knowledge evolves. It’s about answering and engaging with the question, analyzing it from various viewpoints, and assessing all alternatives.

As an experienced IB tutor from BuyTOKEssay.com , I encourage you to accept this challenge. If you need more help or expert assistance, contact our team. Together, we can ensure that your TOK essay meets the criteria and shines with originality and insight. 😉

Liliana Duman

Liliana Duman has a strong background in teaching English language, having graduated from Hacettepe University’s English Language Teaching Department in 2008. With over two decades of experience in the field, she has a wealth of knowledge and expertise to share with her students. In addition to her bachelor’s degree, Liliana holds a master’s in Teaching Turkish as a Second Language and has previously worked at Başkent and Hacettepe University in Ankara. Currently, she is an EFL instructor at Sakarya University, teaching various skills, including methodology, speaking, reading, writing, and listening. In addition to her teaching, Liliana has also contributed to material development and testing efforts. As well as her work as a teacher, Liliana is an experienced private online ToK essay tutor, providing personal help for both IB ToK students and teachers in all aspects of IB ToK essays and exhibitions. She is dedicated to helping her students succeed and achieve their full potential. In her spare time, Liliana also writes articles for buytokessay.com, sharing her expertise and insights on ToK with a wider audience.

Related Posts

TOK Essay Word Count in 2023

What is Theory of Knowledge in IB?

IB TOK Essay Structure in Detail

TOK Essay Grading Rubric

12 TOK Key Concepts with Examples

May 2023 TOK Essay Prompts

Leave a comment cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

10% Discount on Your FIRST Order