Frederick Griffith vs. Oswald Avery
Frederick Griffith and Oswald Avery were key researchers in the discovery of DNA . Griffith was a British medical officer and geneticist. In 1928, in what is today known as Griffith's experiment, he discovered what he called a "transforming principle" that caused inheritance. Oswald and his colleagues, Colin MacLeod and Maclyn McCarty continued Griffith's research and discovered in 1944 that DNA is the material of which genes and chromosomes are made. All modern molecular biology has evolved from this discovery.
Comparison chart
Griffith's experiment.
Working for the British Ministry of Health, Griffith was trying to make a vaccine to prevent pneumonia infections in the "Spanish flu" influenza pandemic after World War I, by using two strains of the Streptococcus pneumoniae bacterium. The smooth strain (S strain) had a polysaccharide capsule and was virulent when injected, causing pneumonia and killing mice in a day or two. The rough strain (R strain) did not cause pneumonia when injected into mice, since it lacked a capsule. When the virulent S strain was heated to kill it, and then injected into mice, it produced no ill effects. However, when dead S strain mixed with live R strain was injected into the mouse, the R/S mouse died.
While neither (heat-killed S strain or live R strain) alone harmed the mice, the combination was able to kill its host. Griffith isolated both strains of pneumococcus from the blood of these dead mice. He concluded that the type II-R had been "transformed" into the lethal III-S strain by a "transforming principle" that was somehow part of the dead III-S strain bacteria.
See Also: Early DNA Research (YouTube video)
Books on Griffith's Experiment (on Amazon.com)
Avery-MacLeod-McCarty experiment
Avery, MacLeod and McCarty continued Frederick Griffith's research with their own set of experiments in the 1930s and 40s, publishing their results in 1944. They used techniques to remove various organic compounds from bacteria to test how characteristics were inherited. After removing certain organic compounds, if the remaining organic compounds were still able to cause R strain bacteria to transform then the substances removed couldn't be the carrier of genes. They thus tried to identify the source of inheritance through the method of elimination.
They first removed the large cellular structures from the S strain bacteria. Then they treated the bacteria with protease enzymes, which removed the proteins from the cells. The remainder of the S strain bacteria was then placed with R strain bacteria. But the R strain bacteria still transformed, proving that proteins did not carry the genes for causing the disease. When the remnants of the R strain bacteria were treated with a deoxyribonuclease enzyme which removed the DNA, the R strain bacteria no longer transformed. This indicated that DNA was the carrier of genes in cells.
See also: Avery, MacLeod & McCarty/Hershey & Chase (YouTube video)
Books on Avery-MacLeod-McCarty Experiment (on Amazon.com)
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Frederick_Griffith&oldid=336599323
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oswald_Avery&oldid=339028131
Related Comparisons
Share this comparison via:
If you read this far, you should follow us:
"Frederick Griffith vs Oswald Avery." Diffen.com. Diffen LLC, n.d. Web. 11 Dec 2024. < >
Comments: Frederick Griffith vs Oswald Avery
- Genotype vs Phenotype
- Transcription vs Translation
- Virus vs Bacteria
- Allele vs Gene
- Plant Cell vs Animal Cell
- Edison vs Tesla
Edit or create new comparisons in your area of expertise.
Stay connected
© All rights reserved.
Avery %53how%73 DNA I%73%20the Tran%73forming F%61%63tor %0AOt%68%65r %73cienti%73t%73 began%20%74o %73earch for thi%73 %22%74ran%73forming factor%2E%22 Attention focu%73ed%20%6Fn two type%73 of che%6D%69cal%73: protein and %44%4EA. The%73e chemical%73%20%77ere the mo%73t likel%79%20candidate%73 becau%73e%20%73cienti%73t%73 already %6B%6Eew that chromo%73ome%73%2C which function in%20%69nheritance, con%73i%73%74%20of protein and DNA%2E%20In 1944, American %62%69ologi%73t O%73wald Ave%72%79 and hi%73 colleague%73%20took Griffith'%73 ex%70%65riment%73 one %73tep f%75%72ther. To te%73t whet%68%65r protein wa%73 the %74%72an%73forming factor,%20%74hey treated Griffi%74%68'%73 mixture of heat%2D%74reated deadly %73tra%69%6E and live harmle%73%73%20%73train with protein%2D%64e%73troying enzyme%73.%20%54he bacterial colon%69%65%73 grown from the m%69%78ture were %73till tr%61%6E%73formed. Avery and%20%68i%73 colleague%73 conc%6C%75ded that protein c%6F%75ld not be the tran%73%66orming factor. Nex%74%2C they treated the %6D%69xture with DNA-de%73%74%72oying enzyme%73. Thi%73%20time the colonie%73 %66%61iled to tran%73form.%20%41very concluded tha%74%20DNA i%73 the genetic%20%6Daterial of the cel%6C%2E A%73 the experiment%73%20of Griffith and Av%65%72y illu%73trate, %73cie%6E%63e i%73 a proce%73%73 in %77%68ich di%73coverie%73 of%74%65n build upon the r%65%73ult%73 of previou%73 e%78%70eriment%73.
A i%73 a pac%6B%61ge of nucleic acid%20%77rapped in a protei%6E%20coat. Unlike livin%67%20thing%73, viru%73e%73 ar%65%20not made of cell%73.%20%41l%73o, a viru%73 can o%6E%6Cy reproduce by inf%65%63ting a living cell%20%77ith it%73 genetic ma%74%65rial. The viral ge%6E%65tic material then %64%69rect%73 the cell'%73 m%61%63hinery to make mor%65%20viru%73e%73. A viru%73 t%68%61t infect%73 bacteria%20%69%73 called a bacteriophag%65%3C/a> (bak TEER ee o%68%20fayj), or phage fo%72%20%73hort. You'll read%20%6Dore about viru%73e%73 %69%6E Chapter 16.
He%72%73hey and Cha%73e conc%6C%75ded that the phage%27%73 DNA entered the b%61%63terial cell during%20%69nfection, but the %70%72otein%73 did not. Th%65%79 further concluded%20%74hat DNA mu%73t carry%20%74he genetic informa%74%69on re%73pon%73ible for%20%70roducing new phage%73%2E Their re%73ult%73 con%76%69nced the %73cientifi%63%20world that DNA wa%73%20%74he hereditary mate%72%69al.
%0A%3C%73pan cla%73%73=%22%73etext%73%75b%22>Concept Check 1%31%2E1 %0A %31%2E How did Griff%69%74h'%73 experiment%73 in%64%69cate the pre%73ence %6F%66 a %22tran%73forming f%61%63tor%22 in bacteria? %0A 2. What%20%64id Avery'%73 experim%65%6Et%73 add to the know%6C%65dge gained from Gr%69%66fith'%73 experiment%73%3F%3Cbr>%0A 3. De%73%63ribe the experimen%74%61l de%73ign that allo%77%65d Her%73hey and Cha%73%65%20to di%73tingui%73h bet%77%65en the two option%73%20%66or genetic materia%6C%2E %0A
IMAGES
VIDEO